Abstract
Fluorine-18 labeling of biomolecules are mostly performed by an indirect labeling method using a prosthetic group. Fluorine-18 labeled 6-fluoronicotinic acid-2,3,5,6-tetrafluorophenyl ester is a useful prosthetic group to radiolabel a protein. Recently we reported an improved preparation of this prosthetic group. To test the conjugation efficiency of the labeled ester prepared by this method we have performed conjugation reactions with two different peptides and a protein. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeting peptide [18F]DCFPyL, αvβ3 integrin receptors targeting peptide [18F]c(RGDfK) and [18F]albumin were prepared in good radiochemical yields. The conjugation reactions were completed at 40 - 50 °C in 10 min. The overall radiochemical yield was 25-43 % in 30-45 min.
1. Introduction
An increasing number of peptide and protein based drugs have been developed for clinical use due to their therapeutic efficacy in vivo.1-4 This has prompted researchers to develop corresponding radiolabeled peptides and proteins for diagnosis and therapy.5-8 Among the clinically established non-invasive imaging techniques, positron emission tomography (PET) is the most sensitive imaging modality which provides a specific view of normal or abnormal biological processes or conditions.9-11 The functional information provided by PET imaging allows an earlier diagnosis and clear visualization of the disease state, which is crucial to provide reliable prognosis and therapeutic intervention. Among the many available PET radionuclides, fluorine-18 is the most commonly used positron emitter for routine imaging due to ease of production and appropriate half-life (t1/2 = 110 min) to allow syntheses, transportation, and imaging procedures.12-18
Fluorine-18 incorporation into the large biomolecules can be achieved by either direct or an indirect labeling approach. However, labeling of biomolecules such as peptides or proteins is difficult due to the number and diversity of the functional groups present. Conventional nucleophilic fluorine-18 labeling to form C-18F bond often requires base and high temperature. Although there are a few examples of direct fluorine-18 labeling of peptide, 19-22 protein labeling is typically performed using an indirect labeling method. In this approach a small molecule containing a suitable functional group is radiolabeled by conventional nucleophilic substitution chemistry using [18F]fluoride and conjugated with proteins of interest. The most widely used prosthetic group is N-succinimydyl-4-[18F]fluorobenzoate ([18F]SFB) 23-27 for conjugation with amine functionalities. Other commonly used prosthetic groups include 4-[18F]fluorobenzaldehyde ([18F]FBA) 28-33 for reaction with amine functionalities and 18F-N-[2-(4-Fluorobenzamido)ethyl]maleimide [18F]FBEM 34-36 for conjugation with thiols on cysteine residues. Click chemistry, widely applied in many fields of chemical sciences, has also been applied to radiolabel peptides/proteins.37, 38 However, while each of these synthesis methods has certain advantages, other complications have limited their applications for clinical purposes. Therefore, there is a continuing effort to develop a rapid, clean and mild synthesis technique for the radiolabeling of peptides/proteins.
Several very useful aqueous based fluorine-18 labeling methods such as [18F]AlF,39, 40 B-18F 41, 42 and Si-18F 43, 44 have been developed to radiolabel biomolecules. Fluorine-18 labeling was usually achieved at elevated temperature, therefore direct fluorination was restricted to only thermally stable peptides. Recently room temperature fluorination using [18F]AlF was achieved by modifying the chelate.40 In all approaches, the precursor cannot be separated from the labeled product. Hence there is a fine balance between the amount of precursor used and specific activity (SA) of the tracers. Large amounts of starting fluorine-18 are often required to produce tracers with high SA.
In 2010, Olberg et al. reported synthesis of fluorine-18 labeled 6-fluoronicotinic acid-2,3,5,6-tetrafluorophenyl ester for radiolabeling peptides.45 The radiolabeling method is straight forward (one-step) in comparison with multi-step synthesis of [18F]SFB.23-27 The synthesis time is significantly shorter as there is no need of time consuming HPLC purification. Moreover, stability of tetrafluorophenyl ester is better at higher pH. This prosthetic group has been used by us and others to radiolabel peptides/proteins.46, 47 Recently, we reported a simple preparation of 6-[18F]fluoronicotinic acid-2,3,5,6-tetrafluorophenyl ester on an anion-exchange cartridge (Chromafix 30-PS-HCO3) without azeotropic drying of fluorine-18.48 Purification of the labeled product was done by Oasis MCX Plus cartridge. The overall synthesis time is only 5 min, similar to the catch and release of the fluorine-18 on the anion exchange cartridge. Herein we report the rapid conjugation of this 6-[18F]fluoronicotinic acid-2,3,5,6-tetrafluorophenyl ester prepared by our new technique with peptide (RGD), protein (albumin) and a small molecule (PSMA targeting) in short synthesis time.
2. Materials and Methods
PSMA precursor, di-tert-butyl (((S)-6-amino-1-(tert-butoxy)-1-oxohexan-2-yl)carbamoyl)-L-glutamate formate salt, and cold standard were prepared according to the literature method.49 Cyclic peptide c(RGDfK) was obtained from Peptides International Inc. (Louisville, KY, USA). PBS 1X buffer (Gibco) was obtained from Life Technologies (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Normal saline was obtained from Quality Biological (Gaithersburg, MD, USA). PD10 MiniTrap™ columns were obtained from GE Healthcare Bioscience (Pittsburg, PA, USA). All other chemicals and solvents were received from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and used without further purification. The precursor N,N,N-trimethyl-5-((2,3,5,6-tetrafluorophenoxy)carbonyl)pyridin-2-aminium fluoromethanesulfonate (1) and cold standard 6-fluoronicotinic acid-2,3,5,6-tetrafluorophenyl ester were prepared as previously described.45, 46 Fluorine-18 was obtained from National Institutes of Health cyclotron facility (Bethesda, MD, USA). Chromafix 30-PS-HCO3 anion-exchange cartridge was purchased from Macherey-Nagel (Düren, Germany). Columns and all other Sep-Pak cartridges used in this synthesis were obtained from Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, CA, USA) and Waters (Milford, MA, USA), respectively. tC18 environmental cartridge was activated by passing 5 mL ethanol followed by 10 mL water. Oasis MCX Plus cartridge was conditioned with 5 mL anhydrous acetonitrile. Semi-prep HPLC purification and analytical HPLC analyses for radiochemical work were performed on an Agilent 1200 Series instrument equipped with multi-wavelength detectors. Mass spectrometry (MS) was performed on a 6130 Quadrupole LC/MS Agilent Technologies instrument equipped with a diode array detector.
2.1. Preparation of 19F standard of c(RGDfK)
To a solution of c(RGDfK) (10 mg, 0.016 mmol) in acetonitrile (1 mL) and water (1 mL) was added 6-fluoronicotinic acid-2,3,5,6-tetrafluorophenyl ester (4.67 mg, 0.016 mmol) and N,N-diisopropylethylamine (6.2 mg, 0.048 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at 50 °C for 1 h. The product was purified by semi-preparative HPLC (conditions: Agilent Eclipse plus C18 column (9.4 × 250 mm, 5 μm), mobile phase: 5 - 50% acetonitrile in water (0.1% TFA), with a flow rate of 4.0 mL/min.) The product peak was collected and freeze-dried to obtain the 19F cold standard of c(RGDfK). (3 mg, 27% yield). LC/MS calculated for C33H43FN10O8, 726.32, found 727.20 (M + H)+.
2.2. Radiosynthesis of 6-[18F]fluoronicotinic acid-2,3,5,6-tetrafluorophenyl ester (3)48
Fluorine-18 labeled target water (10-25 mCi) was diluted with 2 mL water and passed through an anion-exchange cartridge (Chromafix 30-PS-HCO3). The cartridge was washed with anhydrous acetonitrile (6 mL) and dried for 1 min under vacuum. The [18F]fluoride from the Sep-Pak was eluted with quaternary ammonium triflate precursor (5-7 mg, 1) in 0.5 mL 1:4, acetonitrile : t-butanol through a conditioned Oasis MCX Plus cartridge. The cartridge was flushed with 1 mL acetonitrile and collected in the same vial for small molecule and peptide labeling. The cartridges were flushed with 2 mL diethyl ether for protein labeling.
2.3. Radiosynthesis and stability test of [18F]c(RGDfK)
To the solution of 3 (1.5 mL) was added a mixture of c(RGDfK) (3-5 mg) and sodium bicarbonate (10-15 mg) in 1 mL water. The solution was stirred for 10 min at 50 °C. The product was purified by either Sep-Pak or semi-prep HPLC. For Sep-Pak purification, the mixture was diluted with 30 mL of water and passed through tC18 environmental cartridge. The cartridge was washed with water (10 mL) followed by 10% ethanol in water (10 mL). The product was eluted with 3 mL 30% ethanol in water. For semi-prep HPLC purification, the crude reaction mixture was diluted with 2 mL HPLC buffer and injected to the HPLC (conditions: Phenomenex Luna (2) C18 column (10 × 250 mm, 5 μm), mobile phase: 25% ethanol in 50 mM o-phosphoric acid, with a flow rate of 4 mL/min). The identity and purity of the product was confirmed by analytical HPLC.
To test the serum stability, 2 mCi of [18F]c(RGDfK) was added to whole human serum (2 mL) and kept at room temperature. At different time interval (0, 1, 2 and 4h), 20 μL of the incubated sample was directly injected to the analytical HPLC (supporting information, Figure S3) without further processing.
2.4. Radiosynthesis of [18F]DCFPyL
To the solution of 3 (1.5 mL) was added an acetonitrile solution (300 μL) of di-tert-butyl (((S)-6-amino-1-(tert-butoxy)-1-oxohexan-2-yl)carbamoyl)-L-glutamate formate salt (3-5 mg)49 with triethylamine (5 μL). The solution was stirred for 10 min at 50 °C. Solvent was evaporated under N2 and vacuum, and TFA (400 μL) was added. The mixture was stirred for 10 min at 50 °C. TFA was removed under N2 and vacuum. Ethanol in 50 mM phosphoric acid (10%, 3 mL) was added to the crude mixture, which was purified by semi-prep HPLC (conditions: Agilent Eclipse plus C18 column (9.4 × 250 mm, 5 μm), mobile phase: 12% ethanol in 50 mM phosphoric acid, with a flow rate of 4 mL/min). The identity and purity of the product was confirmed by analytical HPLC.
2.5. Radiosynthesis of [18F]albumin
The solvent from 3 was removed under nitrogen at 40 °C. The conjugation reaction with albumin was performed according to the literature method.46 Briefly, to the vial containing 3 was added albumin (20 mg in 450 μL of phosphate buffer of pH 9 + 50 μL dimethylsulfoxide) and incubated for 15 min at 40 °C. The product was purified by PD10 Minitrap size exclusion column using phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) as an eluent. The product fraction was collected in 0.8 mL. Formation of the product was confirmed by analytical HPLC.
3. Results and Discussion
Fluorine-18 labeled 6-fluoronicotinic acid-2,3,5,6-tetrafluorophenyl ester (3), first reported by Olberg et al., is a useful prosthetic group for radiolabeling of biomolecules.45-47 Compound 3 for this study was prepared according to the literature method 48 recently reported by us and purified by passing through an activated Oasis MCX Plus cartridge. In this method, 3 is formed directly by passing the precursor solution (1) through the anion-exchange cartridge (Chromafix 30-PS-HCO3). The use of anhydrous acetonitrile, DMSO or mixture of acetonitrile/ t-butanol is necessary for nucleophilic displacement to form the product (3). Aqueous acetonitrile, methanol or ethanol solution of 1 only elutes the fluorine-18 from the anion-exchange cartridge as a fluoride salt (supporting information, Figure S1). Compound 3 was purified by passing through the activated Oasis MCX Plus cartridge. The activated ester (3) was eluted from the cartridge by flushing with either acetonitrile for peptide labeling (Figure 1) or diethyl ether for protein labeling. In this work, our main focus is to develop a simple and straightforward labeling method to synthesize fluorine-18 labeled peptides and proteins containing a C-18F bond using fluorine-18 labeling prosthetic group 3. We chose to radiolabel cyclic RGD peptide c(RGDfK), PSMA inhibitor (DCFPyL) and albumin (Figure 1) due to their current interests in nuclear imaging research.
Figure 1.
Structures of fluorine-18 labeled cyclic RGD and [18F]DCFPyL
3.1. [18F]c(RGDfK)
Integrin αvβ3 is a potential molecular marker for angiogenesis during imaging and therapy due to its significant up-regulation on activated endothelial cells.50-52 The tripeptide Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) has been extensively used as imaging tracer for integrin αvβ3 because of its high affinity and specificity. In a recent review Chen et al. compared the radiosynthesis, dosimetry, pharmacokinetics and clinical efficacy of clinically available RGD-based PET tracers.53 [18F]Glacto-RGD, radiolabeled by an indirect approach using 4-nitrophenyl-2-[18F]fluoropropionate, was the first fluorine-18 labeled PET tracer of this class tested clinically.54, 55 There are other conventional C-18F bond containing RGD-based tracers.28, 56-60 These tracers are prepared in multi-step syntheses with several HPLC purifications, thus requiring a long synthesis time.
Reaction of 3 with c(RGDfK) in the presence of base (sodium carbonate) proceeded with over 80% radiochemical conversion to the product (Figure S2b) by analytical HPLC. The compound was purified by Sep-Pak to produce > 98% radio-chemically pure (Figure 2a) product with a SA of 1000-2200 Ci/mmol (end of synthesis, n = 12). The overall radiochemical yield was 32-43% (uncorrected, n = 6) in a 30 min synthesis time. A minor UV impurity peak at ∼5 min was observed in analytical HPLC chromatogram (Figure 2a). In a typical radiosynthesis starting from 103 mCi of [18F]F-, the amount of impurity was <7 ug/mL in 39 mCi (3 mL) of product. The crude product was also purified by semi-prep HPLC to remove the impurity peak (Figure 2b). The identity of the product [18F]c(RGDfK) was confirmed by comparing its HPLC retention time with co-injected, authentic nonradioactive standard (Figure 2c). [18F]c(RGDfK) showed excellent serum stability up to 4 h post synthesis (Figure S3).
Figure 2.


HPLC analysis of a) Sep-Pak purified [18F]c(RGDfK); b) HPLC purified [18F]c(RGDfK); c) [18F]c(RGDfK), co-injected with the non-radioactive standard. HPLC condition: Agilent Eclipse plus C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 3.5 μm), mobile phase: 10 - 50% A in 8 min, 50 – 90 % A in 15 min. A = acetonitrile (0.1% TFA), B = water (0.1% TFA), with a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. Solid line, in-line radiodetector; dotted line, UV detector at 254 nm.
3.2. [18F]DCFPyL
Prostate cancer (PC) is the most common cancer in men in the United States. It is the second leading cause of death from cancer in men.61 Therefore over the decades, there has been an increasing interest in synthesis and evaluation of PET tracer for PC. [18F]FDG, the most widely used metabolic radiotracer for PET imaging of tumors, gave mixed results in PC.62 Although carbon-11 or fluorine-18 choline PET/CT showed promising results for the detection of bone metastases, this approach has limitations in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Therefore routine clinical use of carbon-11 or fluorine-18 choline PET/CT is debatable.63 This unmet clinical need led to the development of another class of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) target specific tracers. Over expression of PSMA has been linked to PC and is an important target in patients with negative bone scan who are at high risk of metastatic disease. A recent review by Maurer et al. summarized the current use of PET tracers such as [11C]choline, [18F]fluorocholine, gallium-68, and fluorine-18 labeled low‐molecular weight PSMA inhibitors including DCFBC and DCFPyL in PC management.64 The second generation PSMA inhibitor reported by Chen et al. showed high tumor: background ratio and favorable pharmacokinetics compared to other small molecules.47, 65, 66 Therefore development of reproducible radiochemical synthesis with high radiochemical yield for this tracer is of interest. Synthesis of [18F]DCFPyL was firstly reported by an indirect method using 3.47 Recently synthesis of [18F]DCFPyL has been reported by a direct fluorination method using a single precursor.49, 67 In this report we prepared [18F]DCFPyL by an indirect labeling method. Compound 3 was prepared on a Sep-Pak following the method recently published by our group 48 and purified by passing through an Oasis MCX plus cartridge. The cartridge efficiently removed unreacted precursor (1) from the product 3. Hence this method of preparation of 3 is comparable to initial anion exchange catch and release of fluorine-18 containing target water (Table 1). Final conjugation, de-protection and purification were done according to the literature method.47 The overall radiochemical yield was 25-32% (uncorrected, n = 6) in a 45 min synthesis time. Both radiochemical and chemical purity were >98% determined by analytical HPLC (Figure 3a) with a SA of 1200-2600 Ci/mmol (end of synthesis, n = 15). The identity of the product was confirmed by comparing its HPLC retention time with co-injected, authentic non-radioactive standard (Figure 3b). The total labeling method is comparable with the direct method of radiolabeling (Table 1).
Table 1. Key steps of direct labeling method and current indirect labeling method to prepare [18F]DCFPyL.
| Direct labeling method (Literature)49, 67 | Indirect radiolabeling method (Current) |
|---|---|
| F-18 catch on the anion exchange resin | F-18 catch on the anion exchange resin |
| Wash with water | Wash with anhydrous acetonitrile |
| Elution with base | Drying under vacuum |
| Azeotropic drying | Elution with precursor (1) through Oasis MCX |
| Reaction with precursor | Reaction with second precursor (peptide) |
| De-protection, purification | De-protection, purification |
Figure 3.


HPLC analysis of a) [18F]DCFPyL; b) [18F]DCFPyL, co-injected with the non-radioactive standard. HPLC condition: Agilent Eclipse plus C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 3.5 μm), mobile phase: 5% acetonitrile in 0.1 M ammonium formate (pH 3.5), with a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. Solid line, in-line radiodetector; dotted line, UV detector at 254 nm.
3.3. [18F]albumin
Recently fluorine-18 labeling of albumin by conjugation with 3 has been reported by our group.46 The labeled albumin showed excellent blood pool imaging property. We therefore set out to further simplify the radiolabeling using the current method. By conjugating 3 to target pendant amine groups, albumin can be radiolabeled in 30 min with moderate radiochemical yield (Table 2). The radiochemical purity (>98%) and chemical purity (>98%) of the labeled albumin were determine by size exclusion chromatography (Figure 4).
Table 2. Comparison of yield, time and SA for literature and current method.
| Compound | Yield (%) | SA (Ci/mmol) | Time (min) | References | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Literature | Currentc | Literature | Current | Literature | Current | ||
| [18F]RGDa | 10-35b | 39-43 | 2-2700 | 1000-2200 | 90-218 | 30 | 28, 54-60 |
| [18F]DCFPyL | 5-53b | 25-32 | 340-120000 | 1200-2600 | 55-128 | 45 | 47, 49, 66 |
| [18F]Albumin | 18-35c | 26-35 | n/a | n/a | 90 | 30 | 46 |
Only C-18F bonded tracers are included in this table;
decay corrected;
decay uncorrected
Figure 4.

HPLC analysis of [18F]RSA. HPLC condition: Agilent GF250 column (9.4 × 250 mm, 3.5 μm), mobile phase: PBX 1X, pH 7.4, with a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. Solid line, in-line radiodetector; dotted line, UV detector at 254 nm.
In summary, the yield and synthesis time of this current method has been compared with the literature reported methods for two known PET tracers ([18F]DCFPyL and [18F]Albumin) in Table 2. The RGD peptide (cRGDfK) has not been radiolabeled using 3, therefore the yield and synthesis time of this tracer is compared with the known C-18F bonded RGD tracers (Table 2). The current method requires much less time with comparable or higher radiochemical yield.
4. Conclusions
We have successfully prepared [18F]c(RGDfK), [18F]DCFPyL and [18F]albumin in short synthesis time (30-50 min) with moderate to high radiochemical yield. For the first time RGD-peptide c(RGDfK) has been radiolabeled with 3. This method is comparable with direct fluorine-18 labeling approaches. Due to the simplicity of the method, it could easily be automated for routine clinical production.
Supplementary Material
Figure S1: HPLC profile of the compound (fluoride salt of precursor) eluted with wet acetonitrile. HPLC condition: Agilent Eclipse plus C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 3.5 μm). Mobile phase: 10 - 50% B in 8 min, 50 – 90 % B in 15 min. A = acetonitrile (0.1% TFA), B = water (0.1% TFA). Flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. Solid line, in-line radiodetector; dotted line, UV detector at 254 nm. Solid line, in-line radiodetector; dotted line, UV detector at 254 nm.
Figure S2: HPLC profile of a) intermediate 3 before conjugation; b) crude [18F]c(RGDfk). HPLC condition: Agilent Eclipse plus C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 3.5 μm), mobile phase: 10 - 50% B in 8 min, 50 – 90 % B in 15 min. A = acetonitrile (0.1% TFA), B = water (0.1% TFA), with a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min.
Figure S3. Stability study of [18F]c(RGDfk) at 37 °C; a) 0 min; b) 1h; c) 2h; d) 4h. HPLC condition: Agilent Eclipse plus C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 3.5 μm), mobile phase: 10 - 50% B in 8 min, 50 – 90 % B in 15 min. A = acetonitrile (0.1% TFA), B = water (0.1% TFA), with a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min.
Scheme 1.
Fluorine-18 labeling of peptide and protein through nicotinic ester approach
Acknowledgments
This project has been funded in whole or in part with federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, under Contract No. HHSN261200800001E. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. This research was supported [in part] by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research.
References
- 1.Bruno BJ, Miller GD, Lim CS. Basics and recent advances in peptide and protein drug delivery. Ther Deliv. 2013;4:1443–1467. doi: 10.4155/tde.13.104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Craik DJ, Fairlie DP, Liras S, Price D. The future of peptide-based drugs. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2013;81:136–147. doi: 10.1111/cbdd.12055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Laakkonen P, Vuorinen K. Homing peptides as targeted delivery vehicles. Integr Biol. 2010;2:326–337. doi: 10.1039/c0ib00013b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fosgerau K, Hoffmann T. Peptide therapeutics: current status and future directions. Drug Discov Today. 2015;20:122–128. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2014.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Richter S, Wuest F. 18F-Labeled Peptides: The Future Is Bright. Molecules. 2014;19:20536–20556. doi: 10.3390/molecules191220536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fani M, Maecke HR. Radiopharmaceutical development of radiolabelled peptides. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39(1):S11–30. doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-2001-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Olberg DE, Hjelstuen OK. Labeling Strategies of Peptides with 18F for Positron Emission Tomography. Curr Top Med Chem. 2010;10:1669–1679. doi: 10.2174/156802610793176747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Li XG, Haaparanta M, Solin O. Oxime formation for fluorine-18 labeling of peptides and proteins for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging: A review. J Fluorine Chem. 2012;143:49–56. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ametamey SM, Honer M, Schubiger PA. Molecular imaging with PET. Chem Rev. 2008;108:1501–1516. doi: 10.1021/cr0782426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Willmann JK, van Bruggen N, Dinkelborg LM, Gambhir SS. Molecular imaging in drug development. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008;7:591–607. doi: 10.1038/nrd2290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Li ZB, Conti PS. Radiopharmaceutical chemistry for positron emission tomography. Adv Drug Del Rev. 2010;62:1031–1051. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2010.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Le Bars D. Fluorine-18 and medical imaging: Radiopharmaceuticals for positron emission tomography. J Fluorine Chem. 2006;127:1488–1493. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Papash AI, Alenitsky YG. Commercial cyclotrons. Part I: Commercial cyclotrons in the energy range 10–30 MeV for isotope production. Phys Part Nuclei. 2008;39:597–631. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Levin CS, Hoffman EJ. Calculation of positron range and its effect on the fundamental limit of positron emission tomography system spatial resolution. Phys Med Biol. 1999;44:781–799. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/44/3/019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jacobson O, Kiesewetter DO, Chen X. Fluorine-18 Radiochemistry, Labeling Strategies and Synthetic Routes. Bioconjugate Chem. 2015;26:1–18. doi: 10.1021/bc500475e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Preshlock S, Tredwell M, Gouverneur V. 18F-Labeling of Arenes and Heteroarenes for Applications in Positron Emission Tomography. Chem Rev. 2016;116:719–766. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Liang SH, Vasdev N. C(sp3) 18F Bond Formation by Transition-Metal-Based [18F]Fluorination. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2014;53:11416–11418. doi: 10.1002/anie.201407065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Neumann CN, Ritter T. Late-Stage Fluorination: Fancy Novelty or Useful Tool? Angew Chem Int Ed. 2015;54:3216–3221. doi: 10.1002/anie.201410288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mu L, Höhne A, Schubiger PA, Ametamey SM, Graham K, Cyr JE, et al. Silicon-Based Building Blocks for One-Step 18F-Radiolabeling of Peptides for PET Imaging. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:4922–4925. doi: 10.1002/anie.200705854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Roehn U, Becaud J, Mu L, Srinivasan A, Stellfeld T, Fitzner A, et al. Nucleophilic ring-opening of activated aziridines: A one-step method for labeling biomolecules with fluorine-18. J Fluorine Chem. 2009;130:902–912. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Becaud J, Mu L, Karramkam M, Schubiger PA, Ametamey SM, Graham K, et al. Direct One-Step18F-Labeling of Peptides via Nucleophilic Aromatic Substitution. Bioconjugate Chem. 2009;20:2254–2261. doi: 10.1021/bc900240z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Höhne A, Mu L, Honer M, Schubiger PA, Ametamey SM, Graham K, et al. Synthesis, 18F-Labeling, and in Vitro and in Vivo Studies of Bombesin Peptides Modified with Silicon-Based Building Blocks. Bioconjugate Chem. 2008;19:1871–1879. doi: 10.1021/bc800157h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wüst F, Hultsch C, Bergmann R, Johannsen B, Henle T. Radiolabelling of isopeptide Nε-(γ-glutamyl)-l-lysine by conjugation with N-succinimidyl-4-[18F]fluorobenzoate. Appl Radiat Isot. 2003;59:43–48. doi: 10.1016/s0969-8043(03)00161-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Li ZB, Wu Z, Chen K, Ryu EK, Chen X. 18F-Labeled BBN-RGD Heterodimer for Prostate Cancer Imaging. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:453–461. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.048009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Vaidyanathan G, Zalutsky MR. Synthesis of N-succinimidyl 4-[18F]fluorobenzoate, an agent for labeling proteins and peptides with 18F. Nat Protocols. 2006;1:1655–1661. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tang G, Zeng W, Yu M, Kabalka G. Facile synthesis of N-succinimidyl 4-[18F]fluorobenzoate ([18F]SFB) for protein labeling. J Labelled Compd Radiopharm. 2008;51:68–71. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhu JC, Wang F, Fang W, Hua ZC, Wang Zz. 18F-annexin V apoptosis imaging for detection of myocardium ischemia and reperfusion injury in a rat model. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. 2013;298:1733–1738. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Glaser M, Morrison M, Solbakken M, Arukwe J, Karlsen H, Wiggen U, et al. Radiosynthesis and Biodistribution of Cyclic RGD Peptides Conjugated with Novel [18F]Fluorinated Aldehyde-Containing Prosthetic Groups. Bioconjugate Chem. 2008;19:951–957. doi: 10.1021/bc700472w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cheng Z, De Jesus OP, Namavari M, De A, Levi J, Webster JM, et al. Small-Animal PET Imaging of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Type 2 Expression with Site-Specific 18F-Labeled Protein Scaffold Molecules. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:804–813. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.047381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Berndt M, Pietzsch J, Wuest F. Labeling of low-density lipoproteins using the 18F-labeled thiol-reactive reagent N-[6-(4-[18F]fluorobenzylidene)aminooxyhexyl]maleimide. Nucl Med Biol. 2007;34:5–15. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2006.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Li X, Link JM, Stekhova S, Yagle KJ, Smith C, Krohn KA, et al. Site-Specific Labeling of Annexin V with F-18 for Apoptosis Imaging. Bioconjugate Chem. 2008;19:1684–1688. doi: 10.1021/bc800164d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Poethko T, Schottelius M, Thumshirn G, Hersel U, Herz M, Henriksen G, et al. Two-Step Methodology for High-Yield Routine Radiohalogenation of Peptides: 18F-Labeled RGD and Octreotide Analogs. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:892–902. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Morrison MS, Ricketts SA, Barnett J, Cuthbertson A, Tessier J, Wedge SR. Use of a Novel Arg-Gly-Asp Radioligand, 18F-AH111585, to Determine Changes in Tumor Vascularity After Antitumor Therapy. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:116–122. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.056077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gao H, Niu G, Yang M, Quan Q, Ma Y, Murage EN, et al. PET of Insulinoma using (18)F-FBEM-EM3106B, a New GLP-1 Analog. Mol Pharm. 2011;8:1775–1782. doi: 10.1021/mp200141x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kiesewetter DO, Jacobson O, Lang L, Chen X. Automated radiochemical synthesis of [18F]FBEM: a thiol reactive synthon for radiofluorination of peptides and proteins. Appl Radiat Isot. 2011;69:410–414. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2010.09.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wang H, Gao H, Guo N, Niu G, Ma Y, Kiesewetter DO, et al. Site-Specific Labeling of scVEGF with Fluorine-18 for Positron Emission Tomography Imaging. Theranostics. 2012;2:607–617. doi: 10.7150/thno.4611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Li ZB, Wu Z, Chen K, Chin FT, Chen X. Click Chemistry for 18F-Labeling of RGD Peptides and microPET Imaging of Tumor Integrin αvβ3 Expression. Bioconjugate Chem. 2007;18:1987–1994. doi: 10.1021/bc700226v. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Glaser M, Årstad E. “Click Labeling” with 2-[18F]Fluoroethylazide for Positron Emission Tomography. Bioconjugate Chem. 2007;18:989–993. doi: 10.1021/bc060301j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Laverman P, McBride WJ, Sharkey RM, Goldenberg DM, Boerman OC. Al18F labeling of peptides and proteins. J Labelled Compd Radiopharm. 2014;57:219–223. doi: 10.1002/jlcr.3161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cleeren F, Lecina J, Billaud EMF, Ahamed M, Verbruggen A, Bormans GM. New Chelators for Low Temperature Al18F-Labeling of Biomolecules. Bioconjugate Chem. 2016;27:790–798. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.6b00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Liu Z, Pourghiasian M, Radtke MA, Lau J, Pan J, Dias GM, et al. An Organotrifluoroborate for Broadly Applicable One-Step 18F-Labeling. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2014;53:11876–11880. doi: 10.1002/anie.201406258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Perrin DM. [18F]-Organotrifluoroborates as Radioprosthetic Groups for PET Imaging: From Design Principles to Preclinical Applications. Acc Chem Res. 2016;49:1333–1343. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wängler B, Quandt G, Iovkova L, Schirrmacher E, Wängler C, Boening G, et al. Kit-Like 18F-Labeling of Proteins: Synthesis of 4-(Di-tert-butyl[18F]fluorosilyl)benzenethiol (Si[18F]FA-SH) Labeled Rat Serum Albumin for Blood Pool Imaging with PET. Bioconjugate Chem. 2009;20:317–321. doi: 10.1021/bc800413g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kostikov AP, Chin J, Orchowski K, Niedermoser S, Kovacevic MM, Aliaga A, et al. Oxalic acid supported Si-18F-radiofluorination: one-step radiosynthesis of N-succinimidyl 3-(di-tert-butyl[18F]fluorosilyl)benzoate ([18F]SiFB) for protein labeling. Bioconjug Chem. 2012;23:106–114. doi: 10.1021/bc200525x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Olberg DE, Arukwe JM, Grace D, Hjelstuen OK, Solbakken M, Kindberg GM, et al. One Step Radiosynthesis of 6-[18F]Fluoronicotinic Acid 2,3,5,6-Tetrafluorophenyl Ester ([18F]F-Py-TFP): A New Prosthetic Group for Efficient Labeling of Biomolecules with Fluorine-18. J Med Chem. 2010;53:1732–1740. doi: 10.1021/jm9015813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Basuli F, Li C, Xu B, Williams M, Wong K, Coble VL, et al. Synthesis of Fluorine-18 Radio-labeled Serum Albumins for PET Blood Pool Imaging. Nucl Med Biol. 2015;42:219–225. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2014.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Chen Y, Pullambhatla M, Foss CA, Byun Y, Nimmagadda S, Srinivasan S, et al. 2-(3-{1-Carboxy-5-[(6-[(18)F]fluoro-pyridine-3-carbonyl)-amino]-pentyl}-ureido)-pentanedioic acid, [(18)F]DCFPyL, a PSMA-based PET Imaging Agent for Prostate Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:7645–7653. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Basuli F, Zhang X, Jagoda EM, Choyke PL, Swenson RE. Facile room temperature synthesis of fluorine-18 labeled fluoronicotinic acid-2,3,5,6-tetrafluorophenyl ester without azeotropic drying of fluorine-18. Nucl Med Biol. 2016;43:770–772. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2016.08.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Bouvet V, Wuest M, Jans HS, Janzen N, Genady AR, Valliant JF, et al. Automated synthesis of [18F]DCFPyL via direct radiofluorination and validation in preclinical prostate cancer models. EJNMMI Research. 2016;6:40. doi: 10.1186/s13550-016-0195-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Niu G, Chen X. Why integrin as a primary target for imaging and therapy. Theranostics. 2011;1:30–47. doi: 10.7150/thno/v01p0030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zitzmann S, Ehemann V, Schwab M. Arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD)-peptide binds to both tumor and tumor-endothelial cells in vivo. Cancer Res. 2002;62:5139–5143. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Mondal G, Barui S, Chaudhuri A. The relationship between the cyclic-RGDfK ligand and alphavbeta3 integrin receptor. Biomaterials. 2013;34:6249–6260. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.04.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Chen H, Niu G, Wu H, Chen X. Clinical Application of Radiolabeled RGD Peptides for PET Imaging of Integrin alphavbeta3. Theranostics. 2016;6:78–92. doi: 10.7150/thno.13242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Haubner R, Kuhnast B, Mang C, Weber WA, Kessler H, Wester HJ, et al. [18F]Galacto-RGD: synthesis, radiolabeling, metabolic stability, and radiation dose estimates. Bioconjug Chem. 2004;15:61–69. doi: 10.1021/bc034170n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Haubner R, Weber WA, Beer AJ, Vabuliene E, Reim D, Sarbia M, et al. Noninvasive Visualization of the Activated αvβ3 Integrin in Cancer Patients by Positron Emission Tomography and [18F]Galacto-RGD. PLoS Med. 2005;2:e70. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Minamimoto R, Jamali M, Barkhodari A, Mosci C, Mittra E, Shen B, et al. Biodistribution of the 18F-FPPRGD2 PET radiopharmaceutical in cancer patients: an atlas of SUV measurements. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imag. 2015;42:1850–1858. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3096-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kenny LM, Coombes RC, Oulie I, Contractor KB, Miller M, Spinks TJ, et al. Phase I Trial of the Positron-Emitting Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) Peptide Radioligand 18F-AH111585 in Breast Cancer Patients. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:879–886. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.049452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Liu S, Liu Z, Chen K, Yan Y, Watzlowik P, Wester HJ, et al. 18F-labeled galacto and PEGylated RGD dimers for PET imaging of alphavbeta3 integrin expression. Mol Imaging Biol. 2010;12:530–538. doi: 10.1007/s11307-009-0284-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Thompson S, Onega M, Ashworth S, Fleming IN, Passchier J, O'Hagan D. A two-step fluorinase enzyme mediated 18F labelling of an RGD peptide for positron emission tomography. Chem Commun. 2015;51:13542–13545. doi: 10.1039/c5cc05013h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Mirfeizi L, Walsh J, Kolb H, Campbell-Verduyn L, Dierckx RA, Feringa BL, et al. Synthesis of [18F]RGD-K5 by catalyzed [3 + 2] cycloaddition for imaging integrin αvβ3 expression in vivo. Nucl Med Biol. 2013;40:710–716. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2013.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:225–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.20006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Jadvar H. Molecular imaging of prostate cancer with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET. Nat Rev Urol. 2009;6:317–323. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2009.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Mapelli P, Incerti E, Ceci F, Castellucci P, Fanti S, Picchio M. 11C- or 18F-Choline PET/CT for Imaging Evaluation of Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:43S–48S. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.169755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Maurer T, Eiber M, Schwaiger M, Gschwend JE. Current use of PSMA-PET in prostate cancer management. Nat Rev Urol. 2016;13:226–235. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Szabo Z, Mena E, Rowe SP, Plyku D, Nidal R, Eisenberger MA, et al. Initial Evaluation of [(18)F]DCFPyL for Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA)-Targeted PET Imaging of Prostate Cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2015;17:565–574. doi: 10.1007/s11307-015-0850-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Dietlein M, Kobe C, Kuhnert G, Stockter S, Fischer T, Schomacker K, et al. Comparison of [(18)F]DCFPyL and [(68)Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC for PSMA-PET Imaging in Patients with Relapsed Prostate Cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2015;17:575–584. doi: 10.1007/s11307-015-0866-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Ravert HT, Holt DP, Chen Y, Mease RC, Fan H, Pomper MG, et al. An improved synthesis of the radiolabeled prostate-specific membrane antigen inhibitor, [18F]DCFPyL. J Labelled Compd Radiopharm. 2016;59:439–450. doi: 10.1002/jlcr.3430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Figure S1: HPLC profile of the compound (fluoride salt of precursor) eluted with wet acetonitrile. HPLC condition: Agilent Eclipse plus C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 3.5 μm). Mobile phase: 10 - 50% B in 8 min, 50 – 90 % B in 15 min. A = acetonitrile (0.1% TFA), B = water (0.1% TFA). Flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. Solid line, in-line radiodetector; dotted line, UV detector at 254 nm. Solid line, in-line radiodetector; dotted line, UV detector at 254 nm.
Figure S2: HPLC profile of a) intermediate 3 before conjugation; b) crude [18F]c(RGDfk). HPLC condition: Agilent Eclipse plus C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 3.5 μm), mobile phase: 10 - 50% B in 8 min, 50 – 90 % B in 15 min. A = acetonitrile (0.1% TFA), B = water (0.1% TFA), with a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min.
Figure S3. Stability study of [18F]c(RGDfk) at 37 °C; a) 0 min; b) 1h; c) 2h; d) 4h. HPLC condition: Agilent Eclipse plus C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 3.5 μm), mobile phase: 10 - 50% B in 8 min, 50 – 90 % B in 15 min. A = acetonitrile (0.1% TFA), B = water (0.1% TFA), with a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min.


