Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2017 Mar 10;7:43888. doi: 10.1038/srep43888

Extreme Ultraviolet Fractional Orbital Angular Momentum Beams from High Harmonic Generation

Alex Turpin 1,2, Laura Rego 3, Antonio Picón 3, Julio San Román 3, Carlos Hernández-García 3,a
PMCID: PMC5345098  PMID: 28281655

Abstract

We investigate theoretically the generation of extreme-ultraviolet (EUV) beams carrying fractional orbital angular momentum. To this end, we drive high-order harmonic generation with infrared conical refraction (CR) beams. We show that the high-order harmonic beams emitted in the EUV/soft x-ray regime preserve the characteristic signatures of the driving beam, namely ringlike transverse intensity profile and CR-like polarization distribution. As a result, through orbital and spin angular momentum conservation, harmonic beams are emitted with fractional orbital angular momentum, and they can be synthesized into structured attosecond helical beams –or “structured attosecond light springs”– with rotating linear polarization along the azimuth. Our proposal overcomes the state of the art limitations for the generation of light beams far from the visible domain carrying non-integer orbital angular momentum and could be applied in fields such as diffraction imaging, EUV lithography, particle trapping, and super-resolution imaging.

Light beams exhibit two intrinsic degrees of freedom associated to angular momentum: spin angular momentum (SAM) or polarization, indicating the direction in which the field oscillates; and orbital angular momentum (OAM) related to the spatial profile of the phase of the electric wave. Helical phased beams, also called optical vortices, exhibit a transversal spiral-phase structure or twist around the beam axis, thus having a well-defined OAM, which is characterized by the topological charge, Inline graphic, i.e. the number of 2π-phase shifts along the azimuth of the light beam. OAM beams, typically produced in the visible (VIS) and near-infrared (NIR) domains, are of special interest due to their additional degree of freedom over the control of light beams, making them suitable in different fields such as optical communication, micromanipulation, phase-contrast microscopy, or quantum optics1,2.

Interestingly, it has been recently shown that light beams can carry fractional or non-integer OAM, i.e., photons can exhibit a half-integer angular momentum3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10. In this sense, conical refraction (CR) produced with optically biaxial crystals has been demonstrated to be an efficient method to generate half-integer OAM beams11,12,13,14,15. CR beams exhibit a rotating linear polarization along the azimuth as a consequence of their fractional-OAM11. Applications of CR beams exhibiting fractional-OAM have been reported in areas such as optical trapping, free-space optical communications, material processing, and super-resolution imaging, see ref. 16 and references therein. These applications are limited to the VIS-NIR domain due to the spectral bandwidth at which biaxial crystals are transparent (typically 400 nm–3000 nm). Therefore, new generation mechanisms of fractional-OAM beams at shorter wavelengths –such as the EUV and soft x-rays– are needed to extend the applicability of these techniques to the nanometer scale.

In principle, non-linear optical processes could be used to up-convert fractional-OAM beams into shorter wavelength regimes. For the case of CR, perturbative second harmonic generation (SHG) has been exclusively studied so far. However, since in SHG only oo → e and oe/eo → e processes are allowed –where o and e stand for the ordinary and extraordinary polarization, respectively– the output SHG beam necessarily looses the non-homogeneous polarization distribution carried by the CR beam at the fundamental frequency17. As a consequence, perturbative harmonic generation does not up-convert the CR beam structure into higher frequencies, preventing the extension of half-integer OAM beams into shorter wavelength regimes18.

High-order harmonic generation (HHG) is known as a unique non-perturbative frequency up-conversion process for the generation of coherent EUV and soft x-ray radiation, emitted in the form of attosecond bursts19,20. The underlying physics at the microscopic level can be simply understood by the so-called three-step model21,22: an electron is tunnel ionized from an atom or molecule by an intense linearly polarized laser field, then accelerated, and finally driven back to its parent ion, releasing all the energy acquired during the process in the form of high-order harmonics upon recombination, extending from the EUV to the soft x-ray regimes23. From the macroscopic point of view of HHG, an infrared laser beam is focused into a gas target, and, if efficient phase-matching conditions are met24, an EUV/x-ray beam is efficiently emitted.

A remarkable aspect of HHG is its fully coherent nature, mapping the characteristics of the driving field to the high-frequency spectral region. This property allows to harness the angular momentum (OAM and SAM) characteristics of the harmonic radiation through modifications of the driving field. Recently, after a first experiment of OAM-HHG25, it has been shown that OAM conservation in HHG leads to the generation of several highly charged –single OAM– EUV vortex beams from a NIR vortex beam26,27,28,29. Noticeably, the OAM content of each EUV vortex beam is not limited to a single value, and it can be increased thanks to the non-perturbative behavior of HHG30. On the other hand, although the efficiency of the HHG process is very sensitive to the ellipticity of the driving field31, different schemes have recently succeeded in generating elliptically and circularly polarized harmonics32,33,34,35 and attosecond pulses36,37,38, thus controlling the SAM of EUV/soft x-ray harmonics. As a consequence, HHG stands as a good candidate to translate the fractional-OAM and polarization properties of CR beams to the EUV and soft x-ray domains. However, althoguh OAM26,30 and SAM32,39 haven been recently proven to be conserved separately in HHG, CR-driven HHG opens a new scenario where both SAM and OAM have to be taken into account. Whether spin-orbit interactions40 may modify the conservation rules in HHG remains unobserved.

In this work, we perform a theoretical analysis of the generation of EUV fractional-OAM beams through high-order harmonic generation driven by conical refraction beams. In contrast to the perturbative SHG process, HHG retains the ring-like transverse intensity profile and polarization distribution of CR beams, thus enabling the generation of fractional-OAM beams in the EUV/soft x-ray regimes. We characterize the spatio-temporal structure of the EUV harmonics. We demonstrate that OAM and SAM conservation rules restrict the emission of q-th order harmonic to highly charged fractional-OAM, Inline graphic. The similar divergence of the emitted harmonics allows for the synthesization of structured helical attosecond beams –or “structured attosecond light springs”– that preserve the polarization structure and transverse intensity pattern of the fundamental beam.

Physical Scenario: high-order harmonic generation driven by conical refraction beams

The physical scenario to produce fractional-OAM EUV beams is sketched in Fig. 1. A NIR CR beam, characterized by a double ring transverse intensity profile and rotating linear polarization along the azimuth (left inset), is focused into a gas jet. High-order harmonics are generated upon interaction in the gas, and propagated to a far-field plane where they are detected (right inset).

Figure 1. Scheme to generate EUV high-order harmonics from conical refraction (CR) beams: an intense NIR CR beam generated with a biaxial crystal is focused onto a gas jet.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

The left inset shows the NIR CR beam intensity distribution at the focal plane. The linear polarization distribution (depicted with white arrows) rotates along the azimuth. High-order harmonics are generated in each atom of the gas jet, and then propagated towards a far-field detector. The right inset shows the far-field HHG intensity and polarization distributions, which retain the CR-like beam structure.

Conical refraction occurs when a light beam propagates through a biaxial crystal parallel to one of the two optic axes16,41,42. A focused Gaussian input beam under conditions of CR is transformed into a pair of concentric bright rings split by a dark ring at the otherwise expected focal plane42,43,44. The state of polarization of the rings is linear at every point with the azimuth rotating continuously along them, preserving orthogonal polarizations between diametrically opposite points on the rings, as shown by double arrows in the left hand side of Fig. 1. This polarization distribution only depends on the orientation of the plane of the crystal optic axes45. A more detailed analysis of the CR beam (see Methods) shows that it is composed of two components: the B0 beam, with null OAM (Inline graphic), and the B1 beam, with one unit of OAM [Inline graphic, the ± sign depending on whether the input beam to the crystal is right (+) or left (−) handed circularly polarized]. Both components are orthogonally circularly polarized, so their photons exhibit a definite SAM of Inline graphic and Inline graphic, respectively. As a result, the fundamental beam has an equal number of photons from the B0 and B1 beams, thus exhibiting linear polarization, Inline graphic, and fractional-OAM, Inline graphic. In the results presented below, we restrict to the case of right handed circularly polarized input beams. With respect to the dimensions of the light rings, common biaxial crystals allow for feasible radii in the range of 16–500 μm (see Methods). Note that the generated CR rings can be further (de)magnified with the use of additional imaging lenses after the biaxial crystal to diffracted-limited CR rings down to R0 = 5 μm (R0 representing the radius of the dark ring of the CR beam). It is worth mentioning that the position of the biaxial crystal is independent for the generation of the CR rings, as long as it is placed before the focal plane of the input beam. This is useful in situations where extreme high powers are needed, such as in the case of HHG, in order to keep intensity conditions below the damage threshold of the crystal (of 3 GW/cm2 in KGd(WO4)245). We note that the current crystal technology provides crystals with 10 mm × 10 mm input faces, which would allow using fundamental IR beams with a beam waist radius of w0 ≈ 5 mm (previous to focusing), allowing a maximum input power of about 2.35 GW. Note that in the simulations presented here the laser power is of about 1 GW, well below the damage threshold of the crystal. Therefore, our method can be feasibly experimentally implemented with the current technology. On the other hand, the spectral bandwidth in the visible domain tolerated by the crystal is of Δλ = 100 nm due to dispersion46, which causes a dependence between the direction of the optic axis and the wavelength of the input beam. This restricts the use of short pulses down to Fourier limited ≈8.8 fs at full-width-half-maximum (FWHM) for a central wavelength λ0 = 800 nm. Note however that the allowed pulse duration could be shortened by using a pair of compensation prisms, which extends the spectral bandwidth to 250 nm47, allowing the use of single-cycle pulses (2.7 fs) at 800 nm.

In order to study HHG driven by CR beams, we perform numerical simulations including propagation through the electromagnetic field propagator48 (see Methods). The NIR driving beam is modeled as a CR beam with a waist radius of w0 = 15 μm and R0 = 10w0. In the left inset of Fig. 1 we present the transverse intensity profile of the input beam at the focal plane (z = 0). The driving pulse is considered to have 7.7 fs FWHM in duration, λ0 = 800 nm as central wavelength, and a maximum peak intensity at focus of 1.4 × 1014 W/cm2. Note that the pulse duration is within the limit of that tolerated by the crystal bandwidth. Longer pulses –which were not implemented due to high computational time– could be used without any substantial modification of the physics presented here. High-order harmonics are generated in a 200 μm-thick argon gas jet, and propagated towards a far-field detector. The thickness of the gas jet has been chosen to ensure that the CR double ring structure is maintained during the whole light-matter interaction region, (see Methods).

Results and Discussion

High-order harmonic beams exhibiting fractional orbital angular momentum

In Fig. 2 we present the simulated angular intensity profiles of the 17th harmonic (47.1 nm, 26.4 eV, first row) and the 23rd harmonic (34.8 nm, 35.6 eV, second row), projected into the y-polarization (a,d), x-polarization (b,e), and the sum of both components (c,f). As indicated in Fig. 2(c,f) both harmonics are linearly polarized in a direction that rotates along the azimuth as that of the fundamental CR beam. Regarding the intensity profile, it is clear that the on-axis nodal point of the fundamental beam is preserved in the far-field emission of harmonics. We note that only the outer ring of the fundamental CR beam is intense enough to drive HHG. Thus, upon far-field propagation, the harmonics present a slightly different intensity profile from the fundamental, with an intense inner ring and weaker outer rings. Regarding the far-field EUV yield of the CR-like harmonic beams, our simulation results indicate that the efficiency is similar to that presented in HHG driven by Gaussian beams, where up-conversion efficiencies up to 10−5 can be achieved if phase-matching conditions are met23,49,50,51.

Figure 2. Angular intensity plots showing the spatial far-field profile of the 17th harmonic (47.1 nm, 26.4 eV, first row) and the 23rd harmonic (34.8 nm, 35.6 eV, second row).

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

First and second column show, respectively, the projection over the vertical (y) and horizontal (x) polarization directions. Third column shows the sum of both components, where the linear polarization distribution is depicted with white arrows.

In order to study the OAM content of the harmonic beams, in Fig. 3 we plot the OAM spectrum of the fundamental CR beam (red bars), the 17th harmonic (blue bars) and the 23rd harmonic (pink bars). The OAM spectrum is obtained by performing the Fourier Transform of the field along the azimuth coordinate, thus, giving a clearer sense of the OAM content rather than looking directly into the spatial phase distribution. We can observe that the fundamental CR beam is composed of two components, the B0 beam (Inline graphic, Inline graphic), and the B1 beam (Inline graphic, Inline graphic) with equal yield, thus exhibiting linear polarization, 〈σ1〉 = 0, and fractional-OAM, Inline graphic.

Figure 3. OAM spectrum of the fundamental beam (red bars), the 17th harmonic (blue bars) and the 23rd harmonic (pink bars).

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

The two components of the fundamental CR beam are clearly distinguished: the B0 beam (Inline graphic, Inline graphic), and the B1 beam (Inline graphic, Inline graphic). Thus, the fundamental beam exhibits fractional-OAM Inline graphic. The high-order harmonics present analogously two OAM contributions with counter-rotating polarization, corresponding to the R and L absorption channels. Angular momentum conservation conveys the generation of fractional-OAM harmonics: Inline graphic, and Inline graphic. Note that the OAM spectra are performed over the projections over the y polarization (those over the x polarization give similar results). The OAM spectrum of each beam results from the integration along the divergence angle, and each one is normalized independently.

During the HHG process, OAM26,30 and SAM32,39 have been shown to be conserved separately. However, HHG driven by CR beams opens a new scenario where conservation of both OAM and SAM have to be taken into account together. From the photon picture one can consider the generation of the q-th order harmonic from the absorption of n0 and n1 photons from the B0 and B1 beams respectively, conveying the absorption channel (n0, n1). Let us analyze separately the conservation rules that apply in our scheme of CR-driven HHG. Energy conservation implies q = n0 + n1. Moreover, we note that parity conservation forces n0 + n1 to be an odd integer while the restriction over the photon spin (|σ| = 1) implies that n1 = n0 ± 1, i.e., the number of photons absorbed from the B0 and B1 beams only differs by one. As a consequence, there are only two possible channels to generate the q-th order harmonic: the R channel (Inline graphic), and the L channel (Inline graphic). SAM conservation of each channel leads to

graphic file with name srep43888-m16.jpg
graphic file with name srep43888-m17.jpg

where one can identify the notation of each channel with its resulting polarization, right circular (R) or left circular (L). On the other hand, OAM conservation of each separate channel implies the following build-up rules

graphic file with name srep43888-m18.jpg
graphic file with name srep43888-m19.jpg

i.e., the OAM content of the q-th order harmonic is limited to two contributions, Inline graphic and Inline graphic. Finally, note that the efficiency of the HHG process in a single-color scheme –as that presented in this work– decreases dramatically with the ellipticity of the driving beam31, thus restricting HHG to linearly polarized drivers. Therefore, both channels R and L are forced to be present with similar efficiency, yielding to a net absorption of linearly polarized photons. As a consequence, the resulting q-th order harmonic exhibits linear polarization and fractional-OAM,

graphic file with name srep43888-m22.jpg
graphic file with name srep43888-m23.jpg

In Fig. 3 we observe that the 17th (blue) and 23rd (pink) harmonics present two OAM contributions with counter-rotating polarization, corresponding to the R and L channels described previously. As a consequence, angular momentum conservation implies that the 17th harmonic exhibits fractional-OAM of Inline graphic, and the 23rd Inline graphic, as predicted above. This result shows that OAM and SAM are not exchanged in CR-driven HHG, but conservation of both quantities separately leads to the generation of fractional-OAM harmonics.

Structured attosecond helical beams

HHG offers the exciting perspective of synthesizing EUV/soft x-ray pulses of attosecond duration. An attosecond pulse train is obtained by the selection of the higher frequency part of the HHG spectrum. This synthesis is possible because the high-order harmonics exhibit similar intensity (like a frequency comb), phase, and divergence. Recent results showed that EUV harmonic vortices with single-OAM exhibit similar divergence due to OAM conservation26,28,29, thus allowing the synthesization of harmonic vortices into attosecond helical beams, i.e., attosecond pulse trains delayed along the azimuthal coordinate. This particular spatio-temporal light structure, also named “light spring”, results from the addition of harmonic vortices with different topological charges52.

In Fig. 4 we present the spatial intensity divergence (linear scale) of the high-order harmonics produced in our HHG scheme driven by CR beams. All the high-order harmonics presented (from the 11-th to the 25-th) present similar intensity and divergence, exhibiting a ring profile of about 0.5 mrad. Thus, fractional-OAM harmonics preserve the similar divergence also shown by integer-OAM harmonics.

Figure 4. Angular intensity profile of the high-order harmonics driven by CR beams (linear scale, arb. units).

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

All the high-order harmonics (from the 11-th to the 25-th) present a prominent ring profile with divergence around 0.5 mrad.

In Fig. 5 we present the helical attosecond beam obtained after Fourier transforming the 3D fractional OAM harmonic spectrum, where we have filtered out the low-order harmonics (below the 11-th), simulating the transmission of the harmonic radiation through an aluminum filter. Panel (a) plots an isosurface of the total intensity, where the polarization is depicted with yellow arrows, and panels (b,c) show the projections over the horizontal (x) and vertical (y) polarization directions respectively. Panel (d) shows the attosecond pulse trains detected at the far-field spatial positions with pure horizontal (green) and vertical (blue) polarization. We observe that the attosecond beam is composed of a pulse train –with pulses of ~250 attoseconds FWHM– delayed along the azimuth. As a result, an structured attosecond helical beam –or “structured attosecond light spring”– is obtained, where the linear polarization rotates along the azimuth coordinate. Note that the number of interwinded helices that conform the attosecond helical beam is given by Inline graphic, i.e., the order difference between successive harmonics in the spectrum (δn) times the topological charge of the driving beam (Inline graphic)52. While in integer-OAM HHG two interwinded helices were obtained26,28,29, when using fractional-OAM beams a single helix is produced (note that Inline graphic and δn = 2, as only odd-order harmonics are produced).

Figure 5. Structured helical attosecond beam obtained after Fourier transforming the 3D fractional OAM HHG spectrum and filtering the low-order harmonics (below the 11-th).

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Panel (a) plots an isosurface of the total intensity (where the polarization is depicted with yellow arrows) and panels (b,c) show the projections over the horizontal (x) and vertical (y) polarization directions respectively. A single attosecond helix with rotating polarization along the azimuth is obtained, representing one of the most complex field structures with unique spatio-temporal resolution. Panel (d) shows the attosecond pulse trains detected at the far-field spatial positions with pure horizontal (green, y = 0, x = 0.45 mrad) and vertical (blue, y = 0, x = −0.45 mrad) polarization.

We expect that macroscopic phase matching conditions –such as the relative position between the focus and the gas jet, the gas jet density and geometry, etc.– may offer the possibility to control the spatial and temporal properties of the structured attosecond helical beams in a similar way as it was recently predicted for non-structured helical beams28. These “structured attosecond light springs” represent one of the most complex field structures presented to date, and exhibit unique properties for the inspection of spatio-temporal dynamics at the nanometer and attosecond scales in polarization dependent systems, such as molecules.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we have theoretically demonstrated the generation of EUV beams carrying fractional OAM through HHG. To do so, we have considered a fs CR beam in the NIR domain focused into an argon gas target at standard experimental conditions. HHG and harmonic phase-matching are demonstrated to preserve the CR beam structure of the driving beam through conservation of both orbital and spin angular momentum, producing unique harmonic beams with: (1) highly charged fractional-OAM; (2) linear polarization distribution along the light ring, where diametrically opposite points are orthogonally polarized. Our results show that OAM and SAM are not exchanged in CR-driven HHG, but conservation of both quantities separately leads to the generation of fractional-OAM harmonics. In addition, fractional-OAM beams are produced with similar divergence, thus allowing for the synthesization of structured attosecond helical beams or “structured attosecond light beams”, unique spatio-temporal field structures with promising applications in the inspection of dynamics of non-homogeneous molecular systems at the nanometric and attosecond scales.

Though the spatio-temporal properties of the fractional-OAM harmonic beams could be harnessed using macroscopic phase-matching (as it was proposed for integer-OAM harmonics28), their energy content could be extended up to the soft x-ray regime if CR driving beams with longer, mid-infrared23, or shorter, ultraviolet53 wavelengths were used. On the other hand, our proposal opens the route to generate EUV/soft x-ray fractional OAM beams in other scenarios, such as harmonic vortices generated in plasmas54,55,56, or solid targets57,58, and vortex beams generated in free electron laser facilities59. Finally, we note that the particular polarization and shape of the coherent EUV/x-ray beams here predicted could be applied in fields such as EUV litography60,61, surface structuring62, optical trapping44, and super-resolution imaging63.

Methods

Theory of conical refraction

The geometric optical approximation of the radius of the dark ring, R0, splitting the two characteristic bright rings of CR is the product of the crystal length, l, and the CR semi-angle α, i.e., R0 = lα16,45. The CR semi-angle α depends on the principal refractive indices of the crystal as Inline graphic, where we have assumed n1 < n2 < n3. For KGd(WO4)2 and KTP biaxial crystals typical values of α at λ0 = 800 nm are ≈16 mrad64. This, together with feasible crystal lengths ranging from 1–30 mm, yields CR rings in the range 16–500 μm.

The paraxial solution describing CR was derived by Belsky and Khapalyuk41 and later reformulated by Berry42. For a uniformly polarized and cylindrically symmetric input beam, the general properties of the CR beam are described by the following two components:

graphic file with name srep43888-m30.jpg
graphic file with name srep43888-m31.jpg

where we use cylindrical coordinates (ρ, φ, Z) normalized to the beam waist radius w0 and Rayleigh range zR of the input beam, i.e., Inline graphic, Inline graphic and Inline graphic, with origin at the ring center (ρ = 0) at the focal plane (Z = 0). Besides Inline graphic, k being the spatial wave-vector, n is the average refractive index of the biaxial crystal (n ≈ 2 in most biaxial crystals64), Inline graphic, Jq is the qth-order Bessel function of the first kind and Inline graphic is the Hankel transform of the input beam. For a Gaussian input beam Inline graphic 43,44. The characteristic pair of concentric bright rings of CR are found at the otherwise expected focal plane of the focused Gaussian input beam and they are preserved approximately during a distance zR from the focal plane. Far from the focal plane, both light rings become wider and at Inline graphic most of the light becomes concentrated on the beam axis65. For a circularly polarized input beam described in the basis Inline graphic (+ for right-handed and − for left-handed circularly polarized), the electric field behind the crystal becomes:

graphic file with name srep43888-m41.jpg

From Eq. (9) one can appreciate that the particular features of CR beams are a result of the interference of the two conical beams B0 and B1 described in Eqs (7) and (8). The B0 beam preserves the state of polarization of the input beam and possesses null OAM. In contrast, the B1 beam is orthogonally polarized to the input beam and carries one unit of OAM per photon, due to the spin-orbit coupling introduced by the biaxial crystal11,14. As a consequence, the global CR beam possesses Inline graphic OAM per photon11,12,13,14,15. In fact, the B0 and B1 components can be physically filtered out from the global CR beam by means of circular polarizers, allowing for a separate observation of their free-space evolution12,13,66,67. To better visualize the shape of both components, in Fig. 6 we show density plots of the intensity distribution of the complete CR beam [panels (a) and (b)], the B0 component [panels (c) and (d)], and the B1 component [panels (e) and (f)] in the yz plane at x = 0 (first column) and in the xy plane at z = 0 (second column). As it can be appreciated, the B1 component possesses an on-axis null intensity point preserved upon propagation due to its topological charge. This null intensity point is not present in the B0 component, since its topological charge is null. In our numerical simulations we have used the top sign of Eq. (9) as the input NIR CR beam that produces the HHG.

Figure 6. Conical refraction for a circularly polarized Gaussian input beam with R0/w0 = 10.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Images (a,c,e) are cuts of the intensity pattern in the yz plane at x = 0 showing the space evolution of the CR beam, the B0 component, and the B1 component respectively. Images (b,d,f) show the transverse intensity distribution obtained at the focal plane of the CR beam, the B0 component, and the B1 component, respectively.

Theoretical method to compute high harmonic generation including propagation

We study the generation of EUV/x-ray vector beams through HHG, by performing numerical simulations that make use of an extended strong field approximation, and that include propagation through the electromagnetic field propagator48. We discretize the target (gas jet) into elementary radiators, and propagate the emitted field Ej(r, t) to the detector,

graphic file with name srep43888-m43.jpg

where qj is the charge of the electron, sd is the unitary vector pointing to the detector, and rd and rj are the position vectors of the detector and of the elementary radiator j, respectively. The dipole acceleration aj of each elementary source is computed using an extension of the strong field approximation. Note that Eq. (10) assumes that the harmonic radiation propagates with the vacuum phase velocity, which is a reasonable assumption for high-order harmonics. Finally the total field at the detector is computed as the coherent addition of the elementary contributions. Propagation effects in the fundamental field such as the free charges and neutrals, group velocity matching68 as well as absorption in the propagation of the harmonics, are also taken into account. One of the advantages of this method is its suitability to compute high-order harmonic propagation in non-symmetric geometries. Therefore, for example, it is specially suited for computing HHG driven by beams carrying orbital angular momentum26,28,30, or spatially dependent polarization33,36.

In the simulations presented in this work, the laser pulse envelope A(t) is assumed to be sin2(t) of 2.9 cycles (7.7 fs) full-width-half-maximum (FWHM), whose amplitude (E0) is chosen to give a peak intensity at focus of 1.4 × 1014 W/cm2 at a wavelength of λ0 = 800 nm. The fundamental beam is modeled as a CR beam described by Eqs (7, 8, 9), where the beam waist radius is w0 = 15 μm and R0 = 10w0. The resulting radial vector beam is focused into an argon gas jet (as depicted in Fig. 1) directed along the x-axis. The transverse density profile of the gas jet is modeled by a Gaussian distribution along the y and z dimensions (whose FWHM is 200 μm) and possesses a constant density profile along its axial dimension, x, with a peak density of 1017 atoms/cm3.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Turpin, A. et al. Extreme Ultraviolet Fractional Orbital Angular Momentum Beams from High Harmonic Generation. Sci. Rep. 7, 43888; doi: 10.1038/srep43888 (2017).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Prof. Luis Plaja and Prof. Jordi Mompart for fruitful discussions. C.H.-G. acknowledges support from the Marie Curie International Outgoing Fellowship within the EU Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development (2007–2013), under REA grant Agreement No. 328334. C.H.-G., and J.S.-R. acknowledge support from Junta de Castilla y León (Projects SA116U13, SA046U16) and MINECO (FIS2013-44174-P, FIS2016-75652-P). A.T. acknowledges support from the MECD (AP2010-2310), the MINECO (FIS2011-23719), the Catalan government (SGR2014-1639), and the Max Planck Society. A.P. acknowledges support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 702565.

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Author Contributions A.T., A.P., J.S.R. and C.H.-G. conceived the use of conical refraction to generate high harmonic beams with fractional orbital angular momentum. L.R. and C.H.-G. conducted and interpreted the numerical simulations of HHG, including propagation. A.T., J.S.R. and C.H.-G. wrote the manuscript. All the authors revised the manuscript.

References

  1. Yao A. M. & Padgett M. J. Orbital angular momentum: origins, behavior and applications. Adv. Opt. Photon. 3, 161–204 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  2. Molina-Terriza G., Torres J. P. & Torner L. Twisted photons. Nature Phys. 3, 305–310 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  3. Götte J. B. et al. Light beams with fractional orbital angular momentum and their vortex structure. Opt. Express 16, 993–1006 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Molchan M. A., Doktorov E. V. & Vlasov R. A. Propagation of fractional charge Laguerre–Gaussian light beams in moving defocusing media with thermal nonlinearity. J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 11, 015706 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  5. Jesus-Silva A. J., Fonseca E. J. S. & Hickmann J. M. Study of the birth of a vortex at Fraunhofer zone. Opt. Lett. 37, 4552–4554 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nugrowati A. M., Stam W. G. & Woerdman J. P. Position measurement of non-integer OAM beams with structurally invariant propagation. Opt. Express 20, 27429–27441 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Martinez-Castellanos I. & Gutiérrez-Vega J. C. Vortex structure of elegant Laguerre–Gaussian beams of fractional order. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 30, 2395–2400 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Martinez-Castellanos I. & Gutiérrez-Vega J. C. Shaping optical beams with non-integer orbital-angular momentum: a generalized differential operator approach. Opt. Lett. 40, 1764–1767 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pan Y. et al. Arbitrarily tunable orbital angular momentum of photons. Sci. Rep. 6, 29212 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang Y. et al. Dynamically sculpturing plasmonic vortices: from integer to fractional orbital angular momentum. Sci. Rep. 6, 36269 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Berry M. V., Jeffrey M. R. & Mansuripur M. Orbital and spin angular momentum in conical diffraction. J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt 7, 685–690 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  12. O’Dwyer D. P. et al. Generation of continuously tunable fractional optical orbital angular momentum using internal conical diffraction. Opt. Express 18, 16480–16485 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Peet V. Conical refraction in a degenerated two-crystal cascade. J. Opt. 18, 015607 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  14. Turpin A. et al. Polarization tailored novel vector beams based on conical refraction Opt. Express 23, 5704–5715 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ballantine K. E., Donegan J. F. & Eastham P. R. There are many ways to spin a photon: Half-quantization of a total optical angular momentum. Science Adv. 2, e1501748 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Turpin A., Loiko Yu. V., Kalkandjiev T. K. & Mompart J. Conical Refraction: fundamentals and applications. Laser Photon. Rev. 10, 750–771 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  17. Turpin A. et al. Type I and type II second harmonic generation of conically refracted beams. Opt. Lett. 38, 2484–2486 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Peet V. & Shchemelyov S. Frequency doubling with laser beams transformed by conical refraction in a biaxial crystal. J. Opt. 13, 055205 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  19. Krausz F. & Ivanov M. Attosecond physics. Rev. of Mod. Phys. 81, 163–234 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  20. Miao J., Ishikawa T., Robinson I. K. & Murnane M. M. Beyond crystallography: Diffractive imaging using coherent x-ray light sources. Science 348, 530–535 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Schafer K. J., Yang B., DiMauro L. F. & Kulander K. C. Above threshold ionization beyond the high harmonic cutoff. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1599 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Corkum P. B. Plasma perspective on strong field multiphoton ionization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1994 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Popmintchev T. et al. Bright Coherent Ultrahigh Harmonics in the keV X-ray Regime from Mid-Infrared Femtosecond Lasers. Science 336, 1287–1291 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gaarde M. B., Tate J. L. & Schafer K. J. Macroscopic aspects of attosecond pulse generation. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 41, 132001 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  25. Zürch M. et al. Strong-field physics with singular light beams. Nature Phys. 8, 743–746 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  26. Hernández-García C., Picón A., San Román J. & Plaja L. Attosecond extreme ultraviolet vortices from high-order harmonic generation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 083602 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gariepy G. et al. Creating High-Harmonic Beams with Controlled Orbital Angular Momentum. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 153901 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hernández-García C., San Román J., Plaja L. & Picón A. Quantum-path signatures in attosecond helical beams driven by optical vortices. New J. Phys. 17, 093029 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  29. Géneaux R. et al. Synthesis and characterization of attosecond light vortices in the extreme ultraviolet. Nat. Commun. 7, 12583 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rego L. et al. Nonperturbative Twist in the Generation of Extreme-Ultraviolet Vortex Beams. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 163202 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Dietrich P., Burnett N. H., Ivanov M. & Corkum P. B. Phys. Rev. A 50, R3585(R) (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Fleischer A. et al. Nat. Photonics 8, 543 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  33. Hickstein D. D. et al. Non-collinear generation of angularly isolated circularly polarized high harmonics. Nat. Photonics 9, 743 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  34. Fan T. et al. Bright circularly polarized soft X-ray high harmonics for X-ray magnetic circular dichroism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 14206 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Chen C. et al. Tomographic reconstruction of circularly polarized high-harmonic fields: 3D attosecond metrology. Sci. Adv. 2, e1501333 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Hernández-García C. et al. Schemes for generation of isolated attosecond pulses of pure circular polarization. Phys. Rev. A 93, 043855 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  37. Milosevic D. B. et al. Generation of elliptically polarized attosecond pulse trains. Opt. Lett. 40, 2381 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Medisauskas L., Wragg J., van der Hart H. & Ivanov M. Yu. Generating Isolated Elliptically Polarized Attosecond Pulses Using Bichromatic Counterrotating Circularly Polarized Laser Fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 153001 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Pisanty E., Sukiasyan S. & Ivanov M. Yu. Spin conservation in high-order-harmonic generation using bicircular fields. Phys. Rev. A 90, 043829 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  40. Cardano F. & Marrucci L. Spin-orbit photonics. Nat. Photon. 9, 776 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  41. Belskii A. M. & Khapalyuk A. P. Internal conical refraction of bounded light beams in biaxial crystals. Opt. Spectrosc. (USSR) 44, 436439 (1978). [Google Scholar]
  42. Berry M. V. Conical diffraction asymptotics: fine structure of Poggendorff rings and axial spike. J. Opt. A: Pure and App. Opt. 6, 289 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  43. Belsky A. M. & Stepanov M. A. Internal conical refraction of coherent light beams. Opt. Comm. 167, 1–5 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  44. Turpin A. et al. Blue-detuned optical ring trap for Bose-Einstein condensates based on conical refraction. Opt. Express 23, 1638–1650 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kalkandjiev T. K. & Bursukova M. Conical refraction: an experimental introduction. Proc. SPIE 6994, 69940B (2008). [Google Scholar]
  46. Darcy R. T. et al. White light conical diffraction. Opt. Express 21, 20394–20403 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Fallet C. & Sirat G. Y. Achromatization of conical diffraction: application to the generation of a polychromatic optical vortex. Opt. Lett. 41, 769–772 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Hernández-García C. et al. High-order harmonic propagation in gases within the discrete dipole approximation. Phys. Rev. A 82, 033432 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  49. Constant E. et al. Optimizing high harmonic generation in absorbing gases: model and experiment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1668–1671 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  50. Rothhardt J. et al. Absorption-limited and phase-matched high harmonic generation in the tight focusing regime. New J. Phys. 16, 033022 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  51. Heyl C. M. et al. Scale-invariant nonlinear optics in gases. Optica 3, 75–81 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  52. Pariente G. & Quéré F. Spatio-temporal light springs: extended encoding of orbital angular momentum in ultrashort pulses. Opt. Lett. 40, 2037–40 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Popmintchev D. et al. Ultraviolet surprise: Efficient soft x-ray high-harmonic generation in multiply ionized plasmas. Science 350, 1225–1231 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Mendonça J. T. & Vieira J. High harmonic generation in underdense plasmas by intense laser pulses with orbital angular momentum. Phys. Plasmas 22, 123106 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  55. Vieira J. et al. High orbital angular momentum harmonic generation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 265001 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhang L. et al. Deflection of a Reflected Intense Vortex Laser Beam. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 113904 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Zhang X. et al. Generation of Intense High-Order Vortex Harmonics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 173901 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Zhang X. et al. Intense harmonics generation with customized photon frequency and optical vortex. New J. Phys. 18, 083046 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  59. Ribič P. R., Gauthier D. & De Ninno G. Generation of Coherent Extreme-Ultraviolet Radiation Carrying Orbital Angular Momentum. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 203602 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  60. Wagner C. & Harned N. EUV lithography: Lithography gets extreme. Nature Photon. 4, 24–26 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  61. Tallents G., Wagenaars E. & Pert G. Lithography at EUV wavelengths. Nature Photon. 4, 809–811 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  62. Nivas J. J. J. et al. Direct Femtosecond Laser Surface Structuring with Optical Vortex Beams Generated by a q-plate. Sci. Rep. 5, 17929 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Fallet C. et al. Conical diffraction as a versatile building block to implement new imaging modalities for superresolution in fluorescence microscopy. Proc. SPIE 9169, 916905 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  64. Pujol M. C. et al. Crystalline structure and optical spectroscopy of Er3+− doped KGd(WO4)2 single crystals. Appl. Phys. B 68, 187–197 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  65. Turpin A. et al. Optical vault: A reconfigurable bottle beam based on conical refraction of light. Opt. Express 21, 26335–26340 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Phelan C. F., O’Dwyer D. P., Rakovich Y. P., Donegan J. F. & Lunney J. G. Conical diffraction and Bessel beam formation with a high optical quality biaxial crystal. Opt. Express 17, 12891–12899 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Peet V. The far-field structure of Gaussian light beams transformed by internal conical refraction in a biaxial crystal. Opt. Commun. 311, 150–155 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  68. Hernández-García C. et al. Group velocity matching in high-order harmonic generation driven by mid-infrared lasers. New J. Phys. 18, 073031 (2016). [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES