Skip to main content
Current Genomics logoLink to Current Genomics
. 2017 Apr;18(2):175–205. doi: 10.2174/1389202917666160803165229

Anticancer Natural Compounds as Epigenetic Modulators of Gene Expression

Edward A Ratovitski 1,*
PMCID: PMC5345332  PMID: 28367075

Abstract

Abstract: Accumulating evidence shows that hallmarks of cancer include: “genetic and epigenetic alterations leading to inactivation of cancer suppressors, overexpression of oncogenes, deregulation of intracellular signaling cascades, alterations of cancer cell metabolism, failure to undergo cancer cell death, induction of epithelial to mesenchymal transition, invasiveness, metastasis, deregulation of immune response and changes in cancer microenvironment, which underpin cancer development”. Natural compounds as bioactive ingredients isolated from natural sources (plants, fungi, marine life forms) have revolutionized the field of anticancer therapeutics and rapid developments in preclinical studies are encouraging. Natural compounds could affect the epigenetic molecular mechanisms that modulate gene expression, as well as DNA damage and repair mechanisms. The current review will describe the latest achievements in using naturally produced compounds targeting epigenetic regulators and modulators of gene transcription in vitro and in vivo to generate novel anticancer therapeutics.

Keywords: Chromatin, DNA methylation, Epigenetics, Histone acetylation, Histone methylation, microRNA, Natural compounds, Tumorigenesis

1. INTRODUCTION

The Hallmarks of Cancer perspective presents an organizing appreciation of human cancer complexity of human cancers, and understanding of the aberrant basis of this proliferative disease [1-3]. This set of tumor-associated alterations underline molecular and cellular events that are necessary to support tumor initiation and progression [1-3]. They include: “sustaining proliferative signaling, evading growth suppressors, resisting cell death, enabling replicative immortality, inducing angiogenesis, activating invasion and metastasis, avoiding immune destruction, cancer-promoting inflammation, genome instability and mutation, and deregulating cellular energetics” [1-3]. The additional molecular mechanisms underlying these tumor-specific alterations include genetic and epigenetic changes in the cancerous cells [1-5]. Tumor tissue microenvironment (e.g. endothelial cells infiltrating immune cells, and activated cancer-associated fibroblasts) has been recently added to these tumor-related traits (“hallmarks”) [6]. The hallmark concept suggests novel venues to generate new ideas and approaches leading to potentially beneficial therapeutics involving targeting multiple cancer cell functions, now being explored in pre-clinical and clinical trials [1-6].

Genomic instability is often associated with the alterations in DNA regions encoding oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes, as well as DNA repair genes [1, 7, 8]. Both genetic and epigenetic alterations are arising from exposure to exogenous and endogenous stress agents leading to DNA and chromatin damage and deregulated gene expression and resulting in non-functional proteins that underlie tumor initiation and progression [4, 5, 8-10]. A plethora of epigenetic changes including DNA methylation, post-translational histone modifications, and chromatin-binding proteins, microRNA modulation constitute a regulatory network needed for controlling gene transcription and RNA processing, DNA replication, DNA damage repair, as extensively reviewed elsewhere [11-39].

Accumulating evidence from the global genome sequencing and expression studies emphasizes the role for genetic and epigenetic alterations leading to inactivation of cancer suppressor genes, overexpression of oncogenes, modification and modulation of transcription factors, chromatin and epigenetic regulators leading to a deregulation of multiple intracellular signaling cascades, and subsequently to cancer development [4, 9, 20, 23, 27, 36]. Because of cancer heterogeneity, new layers of regulation have been added into a complex molecular network leading to carcinogenesis and cancer progression [6]. “Epigenetics” is defined as a pattern of heritable changes in chromatin DNA and protein modifications leading to an altered expression of multiple target genes involved in cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, autophagy, DNA damage response, oxidative metabolism [12, 14, 21, 37, 39]. Recently, epigenetic DNA and protein post-translational modifications (PTM, e.g. phosphorylation, acetylation, methylation) were shown to largely contribute to the initiation and progression of cancer [12, 20, 21, 23]. On the one hand, a hypermethylation of specific DNA associated with gene promoter regions causes silencing of tumor suppressor genes, leading to inactivation of these genes in cancer cells [10, 14, 16, 20-23, 30, 32-36]. At the same time, demethylation of DNA promoter sequences of genes inducing cancer (oncogenes) leads to their overexpression and initiation or progression of cancer [10, 14, 16, 20-23, 30, 32-36]. Changes in chromatin structure, architecture and dynamics, as well as alterations in the transcription factors dramatically influence the expression of target genes by either activating or inactivating their transcription [11, 17, 18, 25, 29, 30-33].

Gene expression is mostly controlled at the level of the transcription [40-45]. Transcription control regions of protein-encoding genes include: the core promoter, where RNA polymerase II binds, the proximal and distal promoter, responsible for gene expression regulation, and the enhancers and silencers [40-42]. Activation of gene expression depends on the binding of specific transcription factors to regulatory promoter DNA elements in target genes, subsequently recruiting the transcription accessory proteins (e.g. Mediator complex, general transcription factors, etc.) leading to an assembly of the transcription pre-initiation complex, as reviewed in [40-45]. Transcription factors ultimately transduce the proliferation signals from the cell membrane elicited by growth factors, and other extracellular signals and stress signals through multistep upstream signaling pathways originated in cytoplasm into the nuclei [45, 46]. Many human oncogenes encode for transcription factors or chromatin-associated regulators, which are overexpressed in human cancers (e.g., JUN, FOS, MYB, MYC, NOTCH, MLL, MTA1, REL, SOX9, STAT, TWIST, E2F, ERG, SMAD, WT1), as reviewed in [46-58]. Tumor suppressors (e.g. TP53 family members, F-Box and WD repeat domain containing-7 protein FBXW7, Forkhead transcription factors, ETS transcription factor MEF [ELF4], RECK, SOX10) are transcription factors, as well [54-66].

Epigenetic modifications are potentially reversible, thereby making them highly interesting targets for novel anticancer therapeutics [11-39]. The main molecular events responsible for epigenetic regulation of gene expression are: DNA methylation, methylation and acetylation of chromatin histone and non-histone proteins, chromatin assembly and disassembly, and post-transcriptional gene regulation by non-coding RNAs [11-39]. The human genomic DNA exists and function in packaged forms of chromatin, a macromolecular DNA-protein complex containing DNA, histone and non-histone proteins [4, 31, 45]. Chromatin consists of repeating units called “nucleosomes” [4, 31, 45]. Epigenetic alterations affecting gene expression outcome are regulated by direct chemical modification of chromatin, including DNA methylation and PTMs (known as histone code) of the N-terminal histone tails that protrude from the nucleosome structures [17, 31, 45]. Specific histone tails are the targets of various PTMs, including acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitination, sumoylation and ADP ribosylation [17, 29, 30, 32, 45]. Epigenetic changes are also modulated by non-coding microRNAs (e.g. microRNAs), as reviewed elsewhere [19, 24, 25, 28, 67-79]. Global epigenetic alterations are a hallmark of cancer [1-5, 80, 81]. Cancer epigenetics revealed the deregulation of all components of the epigenetic machinery including DNA methylation, histone modifications, chromatin structure, and non-coding RNAs [12, 17, 22, 80, 81]. Since the epigenetic modifications are reversible and precisely regulated by epigenetic enzymes the modulation of the latter could modulate the transcription of tumor suppressive and tumor promoting genes [80, 81]. Many epigenetic alterations are associated with aberrations in the expression and/or activity of epigenetic enzymes [80, 81]. These are the key reasons why epigenetic enzymes, regulators and modulators have recently emerged as prime targets for anticancer chemotherapy [11, 12, 23, 81, 82]. Drugs targeting epigenetic processes are at the forefront of anticancer chemotherapeutic strategy, and plant-derived compounds (natural compounds) have shown a great promise [83-97].

Epigenetic-driven changes in gene expression could be altered by various endogenous factors including nutrients, as well as by exogenous environmental factors [85, 86, 98, 99]. Potential anticancer natural compounds have been shown causing epigenetic alterations and facilitating the inhibition of cancer growth [83-97, 100]. Natural compounds have been reported to modulate several epigenetic modification processes known to underlie the molecular mechanisms involved in tumorigenesis, such as DNA methylation, histone modifications (methylation, acetylation and phosphorylation), and non-coding microRNA expression [83-97]. Numerous natural compounds from various plants, fungi and marine organisms showed the ability of altering epigenetic make-up of cancer cells through their epigenetic targets [83-100]. Natural compounds have been reported to repair DNA damage by enhancing histone acetylation and affecting the promoter DNA methylation thereby modulating multiple cell death pathways [88].

TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS AND NATURAL COMPOUNDS

When the genome stability is severely affected upon multiple challenges from environmental stresses, the excessive genomic damages cause increased frequencies of mutation and/or epigenetic alterations of oncogenes and tumor suppressors disrupting cellular homeostasis and leading to neoplastic transformation [85, 86, 98, 99]. Genetic and epigenetic changes (DNA hypermethylation, histone deacetylation/acetylation, histone methylation/demethylation and microRNA targeting) of tumor suppressive genes result in their inactivation, as well as in amplification/overexpression of oncogenes, which subsequently leads to initiation and progression, of cancer [9, 10, 13, 14, 23, 26, 69, 72, 80, 81]. Tumor suppressor “driver” genes include: genes for retinoblastoma protein (RB), tumor protein p53 (TP53), BRCA1 and 2, PTEN, VHL, APC, CD95, ST5, 7 and 14, YPEL3, whereas “driver” oncogenes include: growth factors (e.g. c-SIS, WNT), receptor tyrosine kinases (EGFR, PDGFR, VEGFR, TRK, ERBB2), cytoplasmic tyrosine (SRC, ABL, and BTK) and serine/threonine (ATM, MTOR, ERK, PI3KCA, AKT1, 2 and 3, LKB1, and RAF) kinases, transcriptional factors (MYC, E2F), GTP hydrolases (RAS), and others (CCND1, CLND1A), as reviewed [85, 101].

Deregulated expression of transcription factors plays a critical role in various human cancers. Since their activities are tightly regulated, these proteins could acts as highly promising anticancer drug targets. A number of oncogenic transcription factors, such as Activator Protein 1 (AP-1), Inhibitor of Differentiation 4 (ID4), Nuclear Factor-kappaB (NF-κB)/REL-A, and Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (STAT)-3, 5 and 6, MYC, Runt-related transcription factor (RUNX)-1, NOTCH1-4, CCAAT/Enhancer Binding Protein alpha (C/EBPα), β-catenin (CTNNB1), Sterol Regulatory Element-Binding Protein (SREBP)-1c, members of Tumor Protein (TP)-p53 family Interferon Regulatory Factor (IRF)-5, SMAD4, GLI factors, Krüppel-Like Factor (KLF)-5, MIcrophthalmia-associated Transcription Factor (MITF), PAX family members, TWIST, and Wilms’ Tumor (WT)-1 factor are induced in many human cancers and thus may present promising targets for cancer prevention [45, 54, 101]. For example, MYC functions as a transcriptional regulator for many human genes, which correlates with the ability of several transcription-interfering drugs to kill cancer cells. Additionally, inhibition of NF-κB in parallel could strongly enhance the apoptotic potential of the chemotherapy and often overcome an inducible chemoresistance. Accumulating evidence suggests that many natural compounds could potentially affect the tumor cell survival through targeting specific transcriptional factors [102-108].

Curcumin (diferuloylmethane), a polyphenol from Curcuma longa, was shown to inhibit tumor cell growth and induce tumor cell death. Curcumin was reported modulating various signaling pathways implicated in inflammation, proliferation, invasion, survival, and apoptosis [109-111]. Curcumin was shown to induce TP63 and MYC-Associated factor X (MAX), as well as to inhibit NF-κB in hepatocarcinoma cells, and OCT4 in placenta pluripotent embryonic carcinoma cells (NCCIT) suggesting that these genes could act as potential therapeutic targets, especially for cancer stem cells [112, 113]. Recently, curcumin was found to inhibit the activity of NF-κB and NOTCH1 in human hematopoietic Raji cells of hematopoietic origin by inhibition of Histone DeACetylase (e.g. HDAC1, HDAC3) interacting with E1A binding Protein 300 (EP300) and cAMP response element-binding factor (CREB)-binding protein (CREBBP or CBP) co-activators, subsequently resulting in inhibition of cell proliferation [113]. Curcumin was also found to modulate the expression of AP-1 transcription factor components, c-FOS and c-JUN [114-118]. Curcumin (at 40 and 80 μM) induced DNA damage, increased ratio between TAp73 proteins with the transactivation domain (TA-) and without it (ΔN-), and led to apoptosis in the TP73 overexpressing and p53-deficient human hepatoma Hep3B cells [119].

Tea polyphenols isolated from green tea Camellia sinensis are: [−]-epicatechin, [−]-epicatechin-3-gallate, [−]-epigallocatechin, and [−]-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG). The major polyphenols in black tea are: catechins, flavanols, methylxanthines, theaflavins and thearubigens [120]. Black tea compound Polyphenon-B abrogated the growth of rat hepatocellular carcinomas (induced by 3,3'-Diaminobenzidine), while decreasing the hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α expression and increasing HDAC1 levels [121]. Epicatechin gallate induced a tumor cell death via TP53 activation and stimulation of p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) and c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNK) in human colon cancer SW480 cells [122].

Transcription factors (e.g. NF-κB, AP-1, activating transcription factor 2, CREB, and HIF-1α) were downregulated in mouse melanoma cells upon treatment with the combination of epigallocatechin-3-gallate and dacarbazine, or quercetin with sulforaphane [123-126]. Curcumin and EGCG were shown inhibiting the cancer stem cell phenotype of breast cancer cell lines (MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7) via down-regulation of STAT3 and NF-κB signaling [127]. Human pancreatic cancer xenografts when treated with the Traditional Chinese Medicinal (TCM) formula “Qingyi-huaji” exhibited a decrease of NOTCH4 and JAG1 expression and enhanced the antitumor activity of gemcitabine [128]. Similarly, BDL301 (TCM) was reported to inhibit tumor cell proliferation by modulating STAT3 pathway leading to apoptosis in human colorectal cancer cells [129]. Isoprenoid Ascochlorin was found to inhibit growth and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting STAT3 signaling through the induction of protein inhibitor of activated STAT3 [130]. A sesquiterpene lactone Alantolactone was shown to selectively suppress the STAT3 activation exhibiting a potent anticancer activity in breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells and colorectal HepG2 cells [131, 132]. Ethyl acetate extract from Jiedu Xiaozheng Yin was reported to inhibit the proliferation of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells in vitro and in vivo by suppressing the polycomb complex member BMI1 (also known as polycomb group RING finger protein 4, PCGF4) or RING finger protein 51, RNF51) and CTNNB1 (β-catenin) signaling [133, 134].

Nuclear factor erythroid-2 (NF-E2)-Related Factor 2 (NRF2), a transcription factor regulating antioxidant defense, is activated by sulfur-containing dietary phytochemicals, phenethyl isothiocyanate and sulforaphane [135-146]. This activation occurs through the phosphorylation of Extracellular signal-Regulated Kinase (ERK) and JNK protein kinases leading to a subsequent phosphorylation and nuclear localization of NRF2 protein [145]. EGCG induced nuclear accumulation and transcriptional activity of NRF2, as well as binding of NRF2 to the antioxidant response element sequence located at the target gene promoters in human MCF10A breast epithelial cells [142-146]. Indole-3-carbinol purified from the brassica genus of he cruciferous vegetable family (Brassicaceae), including broccoli, cabbage, cauliflower, mustard and radish, as reviewed in [147-150]. In acidic environment of stomach, indole-3-carbinol is transformed into diindolylmethane condensation compounds. Both indole-3-carbinol and diindolylmethane induced apoptosis in various cancer cell lines by modulating nuclear receptor-mediated signaling [147-150]. Indole-3-carbinol suppresses NF-κB activity and stimulates the TP53-dependent pathway and its downstream target genes encoding TP53 Upregulated Modulator of Apoptosis (PUMA), Phorbol-12-Myristate-13-Acetate-Induced Protein (PMAIP)-1, and Apoptotic Protease Activating Factor (APAF)-1 in pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells [150].

Resveratrol [3, 5, 4’-trihydroxy-trans-stilbene] is a natural polyphenol from blueberries, mulberries, cranberries, peanuts and grapes. Resveratrol was shown to display marked anti-cancer potential [151]. Resveratrol blocks the HIF1α-mediated androgen receptor signaling and reduces proliferation of prostate cancer cells in vitro and tumor progression in vivo [152, 153]. In vivo study indicated that resveratrol inhibits the growth and development of pancreatic cancer in LSL K-ras G12D mice (carrying a latent point-mutant allele of Kras2 [K-rasG12D]), as well as the self-renewal capacity of pancreatic cancer stem cells derived from human primary tumors [154]. Resveratrol was found to induce apoptosis of human cancer stem cells by activating capase-3/7 and inhibiting the expression of BCL-2 and XIAP proteins [154, 155]. Pluripotency maintaining transcription factors (e.g. NANOG, SOX2, c-MYC and OCT4) were inhibited by resveratrol, curcumin and epigallocatechin-3-gallate in human cancer stem cells [154-157]. Cucurbitacin B from Hemsleya endecaphylla decreases tumor cell proliferation and induces apoptosis through modulation of STAT3 pathway in human lung cancer A549 cells [158]. Guassinoid from Eurycoma longifolia Jack, eurycomanone, was reported to inhibit Jurkat and K562 cell viability and proliferation without affecting healthy cells [159, 160]. Interestingly, eurycomanone inhibited NF-κB signaling through inhibition of IκBα phosphorylation and upstream mitogen activated protein kinase signaling [159, 160].

Aaptamines from the marine sponge Aaptos sp. decrease proliferation of various human cancer cells through a modulation of AP-1, NF-κB, and TP53-dependent transcriptional activities [161]. Codonolactone, a sesquiterpene lactone from Chloranthus henryi Hemsl, inhibits cancer cell invasion, migration and metastasis of breast cancer cells by downregulating the transcriptional activity of RUNX2 [162]. Hirsutine from Uncaria rhynchophylla is an anti-metastatic phytochemical, which inhibits breast cancer cell invasion by targeting NF-κB activation [163]. Chebulagic acid from Terminalia chebula induces G1 arrest, decreases NF-κB level and activity, and promotes apoptosis in human retinoblastoma cells [164, 165]. Bergamottin, a natural furanocoumarin from grapefruit juice, induces apoptotic cell death in human multiple myeloma cells through the inhibition of STAT3 signaling [166]. The ethyl acetate extract of Annona muricata induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in A549 cells through activation of the mitochondrial-mediated signaling and suppressing nuclear translocation of NF-κB [167]. Isocudraxanthone K from Cudrania tricuspidata induces growth inhibition and apoptosis, as well as a phosphorylation of AKT, p38 MAPK, and ERK, as well as downregulation of HIF-1α in oral cancer cells [167, 168].

Ethanolic extracts of Piriformospora indica roots markedly upregulated the TP53 protein expression in human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells (NPC-TW 01 and NPC-TW 04) in a time- and dose-dependent manner [169]. Grifolin from the mushroom Albatrellus confluens has been shown to induce cell cycle arrest in various human cancer cells by targeting extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 or by upregulating Death-Associated Protein Kinase (DAPK)-1 via TP53 transcriptional regulation [170]. Chalcones (1,3-diphenyl-2-propen-1-ones), naturally-occurring compounds from spices, tea, beer, fruits and vegetables, were shown to modulate transcription factors in key pathways or molecular targets in cancers, including TP53, NF-κB, STAT3, AP-1, NRF2, and CTNNB1/WNT [171]. A herbal carbazole alkaloid mahanine was found to upregulate and activate TP53 protein leading to a reactive oxygen species-mediated nuclear accumulation of Phosphatase and TENsin homolog (PTEN) and its interaction with TP53/TP73 proteins in colorectal cancer cells, as well as to inhibit the STAT3 expression in cervical cancer cells [172, 173].

Dehydroleucodine, a sesquiterpene from Gynoxys verrucosa Wedd (Ecuador), induced cell cycle arrest, apoptosis and DNA damage in human astrocytoma D384 cells [174]. The cell death resulted in the increased expression of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase iNhibitor (CDKN1A) and BAX proteins, and was likely to be initiated by phosphorylation of TP53, TP73, and γ-H2AX proteins in D384 cells exposed to dehydroleucodine [174]. Treatment of radiation-exposed human cervical cancer cells with diallyl disulfide (DADS, extracted from crushed garlic Allium genus), resulted in decrease in cell viability and increased radiosensitivity, as described elsewhere [175]. Furthermore, a combination DADS with radiation activated apoptosis pathways and expression of TAp73, and its downstream proteins (e.g. tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 6, also known as FASLG, and Apoptotic protease activating factor-1, APAF1), as indicated in [175]. Flavaglines (rocaglamide and silvestrol) were reported to target primitive human leukemia cells and enhance anti-leukemia drug activity via MYC inhibition and the disruption of mitochondrial integrity [176]. On the other hand, rocaglamide was found to protect nonmalignant primary cells from DNA damage-induced toxicity through inhibition of TP53 protein synthesis [177].

DNA METHYLATION AND NATURAL COMPOUNDS

DNA methylation of gene promoters is often inversely correlates with gene expression [178-185]. Multiple molecular mechanisms underlie the DNA methylation-mediated transcriptional silencing [16, 22, 27, 30, 33, 36, 186-194]. Transcription factors, including CREB, E2F, NF-κB and AP-2, failed to recognize specific sequences after methylation [194-209]. However, the Methyl-CpG-Binding Domain (MBD) proteins bound to the methylated promoter sequences and thereby also prevent the transcriptional factor to interact with promoter DNA [188, 198, 202]. MBD proteins were shown to recruit HDACs and histone methyltransferases [205, 207, 210-215]. Numerous studies report the role for global hypomethylation/hypermethylation of specific promoter regions of tumor suppressor genes in development of cancer [80, 81]. Whole-genome technologies found that the promoter DNA hypomethylation can activate genes involved in tumor cell metastasis, and invasiveness [9, 15, 16, 23, 27, 30, 36, 186, 189].

DNA methylation is process to directly regulate gene transcription by altering nucleosome packaging of DNA and essentially preventing the binding of RNA polymerase to transcription starting site [82, 189, 198, 216-218]. DNA methylation is catalyzed by DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) transferring methyl groups from S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM) to a cytosine present next to guanine, known as CpG island, forming 5’-methylcytosine-guanine dimers. In mammalian cells, DNMT1, DNMT3A and DNMT3B add methyl group to the 5’ position of the cytosine ring, forming 5-methyl cytosine within the promoter sequence enriched with CpG dinucleotide islands [219-223]. The gene promoter and intron areas are enriched with CpG islands serving as regulatory elements of gene expression [219-224]. DNMT1 is responsible for existing methylation patterns following DNA replication by adding methyl groups to corresponding daughter DNA strands [225-236]. However, DNMT3A and DNMT3B preferentially target unmethylated CpG sites to initiate de novo methylation [225-236].

“In humans, ~70% of all CpG islands are methylated, primarily in the heterochromatin” (transcriptionally-inactive chromatin DNA), thereby serving as markers for gene silencing [14, 237, 238]. In contrast, euchromatin (transcriptionally-active chromatin DNA) CpG islands are free from methylation, therefore providing access to enzymes and regulators of transcription, such as RNA polymerase, transcription factors and chromatin-associated proteins [14, 237, 238]. In cancer cells, global hypomethylation often causes reactivation of various oncogenes, and imbalance between widespread DNA hypomethylation and regional hypermethylation may play significant role in tumor initiation and progression [223, 224, 239-243]. Hypermethylation of CpG islands within the promoter region DNA of tumor suppressor genes could also increase the tumorigenesis causing transcriptional silencing of these genes [4-6, 22, 27, 30, 35, 39]. Inhibitors of DNMTs (5-azacytidine (Vidaza) and 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (Dacogen, or decitabine) are currently under clinical evaluation for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia [243, 244].

In addition to regulation of gene expression by DNA methylation, MBD proteins can bind to the methylated cytosine [198, 245-249]. Up to date, six methyl-CpG binding proteins (e.g. MECP2, MBD1, MBD2, MBD3, MBD4 and KAISO [ZBTB33]) were found acting as transcription repressors in mammalian cells [24, 248]. Usually MBD proteins contain MBD at the amino terminus and a transcription repression domain in the central domain. However, the KAISO protein is lacking an MBD domain, and binds methylated CGCG sequence through its zinc-finger domain. Various MBD proteins may recruit co-repressor complex, including HDACs leading to chromatin compaction, which results in transcriptional repression of genes [211, 212]. A number of genes implicated in regulation of DNA repair (e.g. MLH1, MGMT) cell cycle arrest (e.g. CDKN2A CDKN2B, ARF), apoptosis (e.g. DAPK1 and 2), drug detoxification (e.g. GSTP1 encoding glutathione S-transferase P), are inactivated by this epigenetic alteration [27, 30, 33, 35, 189, 191, 250]. In addition for being transcriptional repressor, the MBD2 protein exhibits demethylase activity in vitro [251-262].

Many natural compounds, particularly flavonoids, are shown to alter epigenetic-driven regulation of gene expression in tumor cells. Flavonoids are natural phenol compounds that form a large group of secondary plant metabolites with interesting biological activities. They can be categorized into six major subclasses (flavan-3-ols, flavonols, flavones, flavanones, isoflavones, and anthocyanidins), which display diverse properties affecting modulation of the DNA methylation status and histone acetylation [263-266]. Flavonoids, a large group (more than 5000 compounds) of secondary natural compounds, are widely distributed throughout the plant kingdom (e.g. parsley, blueberries, black tea, citrus, wine, cocoa, peanuts, etc.), as reviewed elsewhere [263, 265]. Flavonoids were shown to exert cytostatic and apoptotic activities toward tumor cells [263-268]. These biological activities are likely to be supported various molecular mechanisms (e.g. modulation of the activities of phase I/II detoxification enzymes, antioxidant activities, inhibition of protein kinases, cell cycle arrest, modulation of gene transcription via epigenetic modifications), as reviewed in [263-268]. For example, anthocyanins/anthocyanidins from black raspberries inhibited DNMT1 and reactivated tumor suppressor genes by demethylating their promoter DNA regions [269].

A number of studies reported inhibitory effects of tea polyphenols on DNA methylation in ovarian, oral, esophageal, breast, gastric, prostate, skin, colorectal, pancreatic, and head and neck cancers [87, 270-277]. Structural and molecular modeling studies suggested that D- and B-ring structures of tea polyphenols (e.g. EGCG) are important for their inhibitory effects on DNMT activity [267]. EGCG was shown to bind Pro-1223, Glu-1265, Cys-1225, Ser-1229, and Arg-1309 within the DNMT protein catalytic pocket [267, 278]. Additionally, catechol-containing polyphenols inhibit DNMTs through: (a) an increasing of the SAM o-methylation by the catechol-O-methyltransferase enzyme; (b) direct inhibiting the activity of dihydrofolate reductase enzyme, disrupting the folate cycle and increasing SAM levels; and (c) directly inhibiting DNMTs, independent of methylation status [267, 278].

Inhibition of DNMTs by tea catechins and bioflavonoids ultimately results in DNA hypomethylation and re-expression of repressed genes [278]. Studies indicated that the inhibitory effect of tea polyphenols on cancer cells might be associated with their ability to reactivate tumor suppressor genes by promoter demethylation [278]. EGCG has been reported to reverse the hypermethylation of CDKN2A, Retinoic Acid Receptor-β (RARβ), O6-MethylGuanine DNA MethylTransferase (MGMT), and MutL Homolog-1 (MLH1) genes through suppression of DNMT1 activity in human esophageal cancer KYSE 510 cells by binding to the DNMT1 catalytic pocket and inhibiting its enzyme activity [279]. EGCG was found to inhibit DNMT activity and reactivate methylation-silenced RARβ gene in human colon and prostate cancer cells [267]. EGCG was shown to demethylate the promoter DNA regions of genes encoding Annexin A1 (ANXA1) and Wnt Inhibitory Factor 1 (WIF1) in lung cancer cells [280-282]. Exposure of human epidermoid carcinoma A431 cells to EGCG treatment decreased global DNA methylation levels, as well as the levels of 5-methylcytosine, DNMT activity, and DNMT1, DNMT3A and DNMT3B proteins [283]. At the same time, EGCG was also found to reactivate silenced tumor suppressor genes, CDKN1A and CDKN2A in A431 cells [283]. EGCG was reported to partially reverse the hypermethylation status of the RECK (REversion-inducing-Cysteine-rich protein with Kazal motifs) gene, a novel tumor and metastasis suppressor gene, which controls matrix metalloproteinases and inhibits tumor invasiveness [65, 284]. Enhanced RECK expression, as well as decreased levels for matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 were observed in oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines after treatment with EGCG [284]. Green tea treatment markedly inhibited CpG methylation of the RXRα and TElomerase Reverse Transcriptase (TERT) gene promoter DNA regions [285, 286]. Green tea polyphenol EGCG treatment reduced HDAC and DNMT protein levels in methylation-sensitive HCT 116 human colon cancer cells [287]. Similar effects were shown in esophageal, oral, skin, lung, breast and prostate cancer cells suggesting the potential molecular mechanism for green tea anticancer effects [270].

Soy flavonoids, genistein, biochanin A and daidzein, were shown to reverse DNA hypermethylation of CDKN2A, RARβ, and MGMT genes in human esophageal squamous KYSE 510 carcinoma cells, as well as RARβ gene in human prostate cancer LNCaP and PC-3 cells. This effect was correlated with inhibition of DNMT1, 3A and 3B [288]. Non-toxic concentrations of genistein induced demethylation of the GSTP1 gene promoter DNA regions, which led to a restoration of its expression in human breast cancer MDA-MB-468 cells [289]. Genistein exposure was shown to demethylate the promoter region DNA of BTG3 tumor suppressor gene, whose expression was downregulated in renal cancer, by inhibiting the activity of DNMT1 and MBD2 in renal cell carcinoma A498 cells [290]. Human colon cancer SW1116 cells treated with genistein exhibited induced WNT5A gene expression and decreased methylation of CpG islands on its promoter DNA regions, as well as reduced tumor cell proliferation [291, 292]. Flavonol quercetin from citrus fruits and buckwheat inhibited the proliferation of colon cancer RKO cells by reversing hypermethylation of the CDKN2A gene promoter DNA [293, 294].

In silico studies showed that curcumin could covalently block the catalytic thiol group at the C1226 binding site of DNMT1 [295]. Curcumin was found to induce global hypomethylation, as well sequence-specific demethylation at promoter DNA regions of epigenetically silenced genes in human leukemia MV4-11 cells [296]. Mouse Nrf2 gene was epigenetically silenced during the progression of prostate tumorigenesis in TRAMP mice [297]. Curcumin reversed the methylation status of the first 5 CpG islands in the promoter DNA region of the mouse Nrf2 gene [298]. Curcumin treatment restored expression of human NEUROG1 gene encoding neurogenin 1 in prostate cancer LNCaP cells by demethylating the first fourteen CpG sites within its promoter DNA [299]. Curcumin also reduced MECP2 binding to the human NEUROG1 gene promoter DNA sequences [299]. Treatment with curcumin increased HDAC1, 4, 5, and 8 levels, but decreased HDAC3 expression. HDAC activity, H3K27me3 levels, binding at the NEUROG1 promoter DNA region was decreased after treatment, suggesting ability of curcumin to re-express yet another gene silenced by epigenetic modification in cancer [299]. Curcumin induced demethylation of the RARβ2 gene promoter DNA sequence, and subsequently reactivation of this gene in SiHa cervical squamous cell carcinoma cells and HeLa cervical adenocarcinoma cells [300].

Hydrolysis of these glucosinolates from Brassicaceae (known as cruciferous vegetables, such as e.g. cauliflower, cabbage, garden cress, bok choy, broccoli, brussels sprouts) by myrosinase generates biologically active isothiocyanates (sulforaphane, phenethyl isothiocyanate), and indoles [301-303]. Sulforaphane exhibits anti-carcinogenic activity, enhances xenobiotic metabolism, induces cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis in human cancer cells [304]. Sulforaphane decreased DNMT1 and DNMT3A enzymatic activities and demethylated the human TERT gene first exon in human colon cancer CaCo-2 cells and breast cancer MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells [305, 306]. Sulforaphane and 3,3'-diindolylmethane were found to induce re-expression of tumor suppressor genes silenced in cancer cells via modulation of DNA methylation [307]. Both sulforaphane and 3,3'-diindolylmethane were shown to decrease DNA methyltransferase expression leading to a genome-wide promoter hypomethylation in human androgen-dependent and independent prostate cancer cells [307]. Intriguingly, sulforaphane and 3,3'-diindolylmethane shared similar gene targets, which are highly involved in cancer progression, within a single cell line [307]. Phenethyl isothiocyanate was found to suppress growth and induce apoptosis in cancer cells [308]. Human prostate cancer LNCaP cells exposed to phenethyl isothiocyanate exhibited demethylation of the GSTP1 gene promoter, decreased HDAC activity, and activated histone acetylation and methylation on specific genes [309].

Epigenetic activity of retinoic acid is mediated by its interaction with their nuclear receptors RAR -α, -β and -γ subsequently leading to modulation of target gene promoters, including CDKN1A and AP-1 [310, 311]. For example, retinoid acid activated the CDKN1A expression in human cervical squamous carcinoma, and inhibited AP-1 transcriptional activity in human gastric cancer cells [312, 313]. To uncover the molecular mechanism underlying these events, DNMT1 was shown to form protein-protein complexes with Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen (PCNA) and Ubiquitin-like, containing PHD and RING Finger domains-1 (UHRF1) proteins [314-318]. Furthermore, the disruption of DNMT1/ PCNA/UHRF1 interactions modulates the DNMT1 activity and promotes a global DNA hypomethylation in human gliomas [316, 317, 319]. As shown, CDKN1A binds to PCNA, while the latter associates with DNMT, however, the phosphorylation of the former at the Serine-146 inhibits this protein-protein interaction [320, 321]. Emerging evidence suggests that cell cycle regulator CDKN1A may regulate methylation by blocking access of DNMT to PCNA [314, 320, 321].

AP-1 induces the DNMT1 gene expression via binding to the specific DNMT1 regulatory region [322]. Inhibiton of AP-1 activity by retinoid acid was shown to downregulate AP-1 responsive genes (e.g. DNMT1), and thus decrease global DNA methylation [313]. Modulation of DNA methylation patterns by retinoic acid can contribute to its anti-proliferative, and pro-apoptotic actions observed in leukemia, breast, prostate, pancreatic, and head and neck cancers [323-331]. Treatment of human MCF-7 breast cancer cells with retinoid acid reduced promoter methylation and increased in the expression of RARβ2 and PTEN tumor suppressor genes, as well as inhibited breast cancer growth [84, 186, 332, 333]. Genome-wide analysis of the potential effects of all-trans retinoid acids on gene methylation and expression in neuroblastoma revealed that retinoic acid compounds reduced the expression of methyltransferases, DNMT1 and DNMT3B, while induced the expression of microRNAs targeting these DNMT proteins [334, 335].

Cucurbitacin B, a single bioactive triterpenoid natural compound, was shown to inhibit DNMTs and HDACs in H1299 non-small cell lung cancer cells leading to the reactivation of tumor suppressor genes (e.g. CDKN1A and CDKN2A), as well as downregulation of oncogenes (e.g. c-MYC and K-RAS), and human TERT gene [336]. Cucurbitacin B markedly decreased growth of 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone-induced lung tumors in A/J mice [336]. Z-Ligustilide from Radix Angelicae Sinensis was shown to restore Nrf2 gene expression in mouse TRAMP C1 cells through epigenetic modification leading to an increase expression of endogenous Nrf2 mRNA and Nrf2 protein, as well as Nrf2 downstream target genes (e.g. Ho1, Nqo1, and Ugt1a1), as reviewed elsewhere [337]. Z-Ligustilide treatment decreased the level of methylation of the Nrf2 promoter region, binding of anti-methyl antibody to the Nrf2 promoter, as well as inhibited DNMT activity in vitro [337]. This study demonstrated that the expression of Nrf2 is likely to be controlled by epigenetic alterations, since these changes were reversed by natural compounds resulting in the prevention of carcinogenesis in the mouse TRAMP prostate cancer model [337].

Kazinol Q, a natural compound from Broussonetia kazinoki, was shown a promise as an inhibitor of DNMT1 [338]. Kazinol Q inhibited DNMT activity and subsequently reactivated the expression of a DNA methylation-silenced gene, CDH1 encoding E-cadherin, in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells [338]. Furthermore, kazinol Q inhibited the proliferation of human breast cancer MCF-7 cells and prostate cancer LNCaP cells via induction of apoptosis [338]. Similarly to EGCG, kazinol Q inhibited DNMT activity by competing with cytosine binding [338]. An aqueous extract of Opuntia ficus indica, and its bioactive ingredient, betalain indicaxanthin, was reported to upregulate demethylation of the tumor suppressor gene CDKN2A [339]. Annurca apple from southern Italy is rich in polyphenols that are associated with anticancer properties showing their ability to induce cell death in colorectal cancer cell lines (RKO, SW48, and SW480), as reviewed in [340]. Treatment of tumor cells with the Annurca apple extract led to a significant increase of TP53 protein expression, as well as to a reduced promoter DNA methylation for MLH1, ARF1, and CDKN2A genes due to a marked downregulation of DNMT protein levels [340]. Modulating effects of polyphenols, caffeic acid and chlorogenic acid, were reported on methylation of the RARβ promoter DNA region in MCF-7 and MAD-MB-231 human breast cancer cells [341]. Phenolic natural compounds, bromotyrosines, accumulated by marine sponges (e.g. Aplysinella rhax, Suberea mollis, Verongia aerophoba, Lanthella basta order Verongida, family Aplysinidae) include: psammaplin A, aerothionin, aeroplysinin-1, dienone, and bastadins) were shown to exhibit modulating activities towards epigenetic targets, such as HDAC and DNMT [342].

Parthenolide, a sesquiterpene lactone from Tanacetum parthenium, was shown to exhibit anti-cancer properties by inhibiting NF-kB activation, but promoting ubiquitination of MDM2 and activating TP53 cellular functions [343-349]. Parthenolide decreases DNMT1 expression and activity in human leukemia cell lines (K562, Kasumi-1, MV4-11) and human MCF-7 breast cancer cells leading to a decreased global methylation and hypomethylation and activation of the Secretoglobin family 3A member 1 (SCGB3A1, also known as HIN1) tumor suppressor gene [350]. Fungal metabolite, verticillin A (Verticillium species-infected mushrooms), mediates its anticancer activity and overcomes apoptosis resistance in human colon carcinoma cells by inhibiting DNA methylation or inducing DNA demethylation of BNIP3 gene encoding BCL2/adenovirus E1B 19 kDa protein-interacting protein involved in the regulation of apoptosis [351].

Folate, cobalamin, riboflavin, pirydoxine or methionine are involved in the regulation of the DNA methylation by controlling the level of a methyl donor, SAM [352-354]. Folate deficiency has been shown to increase DNMT1, DNMT3B, MBD2 and MBD4 levels in human hepatoma cells [355, 356]. The increase in DNMTs led to hypermethylation, whereas induced MBD2 and MBD4 levels underlie hypomethylation of oncogenes and metastatic genes [33, 223, 357]. The increasing concentrations of folic acid lead to a dose-dependent down-regulation of PTEN, APC and RARβ2 tumor suppressor genes in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell lines with different invasive capacity [358].

CHROMATIN PROTEIN MODIFICATIONS AND NATURAL COMPOUNDS

The histone modifications affecting chromatin architecture play important roles in the regulation of gene expression, as well as in initiation and progression of tumorigenesis [4, 17, 30, 31, 359]. Chromatin proteins are critically involved in the packaging of genomic DNA into nucleosome and higher order chromatin fibers. Histones maintain the stability of nucleosomes and the highly folded chromatin structures, as reviewed in [360]. Histone PTMs regulate the chromatin folding and packaging leading to the regulation of activation or repression of target genes, as reviewed in [360-366]. Each nucleosome consists of ~147 base pairs of DNA sequence wrapped around an octamer of histone proteins (e.g. double subunits of H2A, H2B, H3 and H4 core histones), as reviewed elsewhere [360-366]. Histone proteins are regulators of chromatin dynamics caused by specific PTMs (known as ”histone code’) or altering electrostatic charge [367, 368].

There are two types of chromatin entities: heterochromatin containing transcriptionally inactive genes) and euchromatin (containing transcriptionally active genes), as reviewed in [360-364]. On the one hand, heterochromatin is a tightly packed structure with almost no accessibility for transcription factors and RNA polymerase complex [360-364]. On the other hand, euchromatin is loosely packed and readily accessible to transcriptional factors and RNA polymerase to initiate and maintain gene transcription [360-364]. The majority of PTMs (e.g. acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and sumoylation) occur at the lysine, arginine, and serine residues of the N-terminal histone tails extending from the histone core [361]. These modifications of histone proteins could activate or repress the transcription of the target genes, depending on the location and the type of the PTMs involved [361].

A number of histone-modifying enzymes are involved in histone modifications, as reviewed elsewhere [359-361]. Histone AcetylTransferases (HATs) and histone methyltransferases add acetyl groups and methyl groups, respectively, to the histone tails covalently. HDACs and histone demethylases, however, remove acetyl and methyl groups, respectively, from histones [361]. HATs have been divided into multiple classes—GNAT (GCN5, PCAF, HAT1, HPA2, HPA3, ATF-2, and NUT1), MYST (MOZ, YBF2, SAS2, and TIP60), EP300/CBP, SRC, CLOCK, RTT109 and TAFII250 (TAFII250) - based on structure, homology, and histone specificity [93, 369]. HATs catalyze histone acetylation, while assisting transcription factors to bind nucleosomal DNA on lysine residues in the N-terminal tails of core histones [93, 369]. On the contrary, HDACs catalyze deacetylation by cleavage of acetyl groups from the histone molecules, leading to a chromatin compaction and subsequently restricting the binding of transcription factors to DNA, thereby repressing gene expression [359, 369, 370]. To date, 18 HDACs and 25 HATs proteins have been identified. HDACs are divided into four classes—I, II, III and IV—based on homology, size, sub-cellular expression, and number of enzymatic domains, as reviewed in [370]. Class I HDACs (HDAC1, 2, 3 and 8) share sequence similarity with the yeast RPD3 deacetylase, and are localized mainly in the nucleus [370]. Class II HDACs (HDAC4, 5, 6, 7, 9 and 10) are homologous to the yeast Hda1 deacetylase, are nuclear and cytoplasmic. Class II HDACs are further subdivided into class IIa (HDAC4, 5, 7 and 9) and class IIb (HDAC6 and 10), as described elsewhere [370]. Class III HDACs are represented by sirtuins (SIRT1 to SIRT7), a family of seven HDACs sharing homology with yeast silent information regulator 2 (Sir2) [369]. Class IV has only one member, HDAC11 [371, 372].

TP53 is a key substrate for HDAC1; E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase MDM2 (Mouse Double Minute 2 homolog) recruits HDAC1, which subsequently induces the deacetylation of TP53 protein, in turn leading to a proteasome-dependent degradation of TP53, as reviewed in [370]. HDAC1 decreases DNA damage-induced TP53 acetylation, and inhibits the induction of CDKN1A (p21) and MDM2 [373, 374]. Both HDAC1 and HDAC2 recruited to DNA damage sites were shown to regulate the deacetylation of histones H3K56 and H4K16 suggesting their roles in transcription repression [370]. By association with the co-repressors SMRT and N-CoR, HDAC3 regulates the transcription of numerous gene targets [375]. HDAC4, HDAC6, HDAC9 and HDAC10 were reported to be involved in genome instability, transcription factor binding, and DNA repair, as reviewed in [376-378]. SIRT1, SIRT3 and SIRT6 play critical roles in genome stability and repair, gene transcription, cellular metabolism, stress response, and tumorigenesis, as reviewed in [370]. Several transcriptional factors (TP53, forkhead box transcription factor [FOXO]), and chromatin accessory proteins (non-homologous end joining factor, X-ray repair complementing defective repair protein Ku70, histone acetyltransferase KAT5 (TIP60), MRN repair complex consisting of double-strand break repair protein MRE11, DNA repair protein RAD50 and NBS1 [nibrin]) are inactivated by SIRT1 via deacetylation, as reviewed elsewhere [371]. SIRT3 has been shown to deacetylate and activate mitochondrial isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 leading to increased NADPH levels [370].

Deregulation of histone acetylation often occurs during tumorigenesis [29]. The tightly packed chromatin DNA associated with transcriptionally repressed genes associated with DNA hypermethylation catalyzed by DNMT, as well as with histone deacetylation catalyzed by HDAC [29, 370, 378]. However, acetylation of histones by HAT enzymes and DNA demethylation increased accessibility for transcription factors and their co-activator complexes leading to activation of gene transcription, as reviewed elsewhere [379-382]. In cancer cells, the balance between HAT and HDAC activities is disrupted, and often associated with higher levels of HDAC proteins, therefore tumor cells exhibit aberrant histone and non-histone protein acetylation patterns and epigenetic silencing of tumor suppressor genes, as reviewed in [382]. HDAC activity was reported to increase in metastatic prostate cancer cells compared with prostate hyperplasia, as reviewed in [382]. Intriguingly, HDAC inhibitors (e.g. suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, valproic acid, depsipeptide, and sodium butyrate) are effective chemotherapeutic tools against prostate cancer cells in vitro and xenograft models in vivo [382].

Epigenetic effect of a given histone methylation mark is dependent on the modification site, as well as on the degree and symmetry of methylation [380-384]. Histone methylation serves as a docking site for effector proteins, such as methyl-lysine (e.g. TP53-binding protein 1, Jumonji domain containing 2A protein, and AT rich interactive domain 4A protein), or methyl-arginine binding domain-containing proteins (Survival motor neuron protein, Tudor domain-containing protein 3, Piwi-like protein 1, and Splicing factor 30), or chromodomain-containing proteins (e.g. chromodomain-helicase-DNA-binding proteins, CHD1-8 and heterochromatin protein 1, HP1), as reviewed in [216, 380-384]. Histone methylation occurs on either arginine or lysine residues. Lysine residues can be mono-, di-, or tri-methylated by various histone methylation transferases from the SET domain protein family [367, 384-386]. Lysine methylation is not limited to histone proteins, as several non-histone proteins are also subject to methylation [367, 387]. Protein arginines can be mono- or di-methylated by the family of Protein aRginine MethylTransferases (PRMT) resulting in transcriptional activation of gene expression [367, 385-388]. There are nine PRMT proteins, which catalyze three types of arginine methylation - monomethylation and two types of dimethylation [367]. Protein arginine methylation was reported to regulate signal transduction, gene transcription, DNA repair and mRNA splicing [366].

Depending on the affected residue and number of added methyl groups, histone lysine methylation could result in either transcriptional activation or repression [367, 369]. Acetylation of histone H3K9ac leads to transcriptional activation, whereas, methylation of histones H3K9me, H3K9me2, and H3K9me3 could repress gene expression [369]. Depending on the balance between histone H3K9 acetylation and methylation, however, methylation of histone H3K9me3 can activate gene expression [369]. Inactive gene promoter regions are enriched with histone H3 trimethylated at lysine 27 (H3K27me3) or at lysine 9 (H3K9me3), while active gene promoter regions contain histone H3 trimethylated at lysine 4 (H3K4me3). Regulatory enhancer sequences attached to histone H3 monomethylated at lysine 4 (H3K4me1) and acetylated at lysine 27 (H3K27ac), as described elsewhere [367, 369, 389]. The histone proteins coordinate the changing dynamics and reversible turnover between heterochromatin and euchromatin DNA in order to rapidly regulate gene transcription [367, 369, 385, 389-391]. For instance, euchromatin-specific PTMs (e.g. acetylation of histones H3 and H4, or di- or trimethylation (me) of histone H3K4) are associated with transcriptionalluy active genes, whereas di- or trimethylation of histone H3K9 and trimethylation of histone H3K27 are connected to repressed genes [367, 369, 385, 389-391]. Upregulation of the histone methyltransferase Enhancer of Zeste Homolog (EZH)-2 adds the trimethyl residues to histone H3K27 at the position Lysine-27, inhibits tumor suppressor gene expression, and increases tumor progression in human prostate cancer cells in vitro and in vivo [392-396].

Recently found several histone demethylases play important roles in demethylating lysines and regulation of gene transcription [392, 393]. For example, the upregulated levels of Lysine-Specific Demethylase (LSD1) are associated with an increase in tumor cell proliferation, aggressiveness in hormone refractory prostate cancer [397-399]. LSD1 was found to remove mono- or di-methyl groups from histone H3K4 leading to gene repression, since H3K4 methylation is an activating mark. In contrast, LSD1 demethylation of histone H3K9 leads to gene activation during epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in the prostate cancer [398, 399].

A large number of natural compounds were shown affecting various histone-modifying enzymes [83, 100, 370, 378]. For example, resveratrol was found to downregulate expression of the MeTastasis Associated protein-1 (MTA1, a known component of the nucleosome remodeling and deacetylating complex [NuRD]), which is overexpressed in several cancers, including prostate cancer, as indicated elsewhere [58, 400, 401]. By downregulating MTA1 expression resveratrol disrupted the MTA1/HDAC interaction in NuRD co-repressor complex causing increased expression and acetylation of TP53, and subsequently leading to increased BAX and CDKN1A (p21) expression and apoptosis in prostate cancer cells [58, 400, 401]. While MTA1 was found to inactivate PTEN in prostate cancer cells, resveratrol promotes acetylation and reactivation of PTEN via inhibition of the MTA1/ HDAC complex, subsequently resulting in inhibition of the AKT pathway, as indicated in [58, 400, 401]. Resveratrol was also shown to re-activate TP53 acetylation in prostate cancer cells [58, 400, 401]. Pterostilbene, a natural resveratrol derivative found in blueberries, strongly increased the MTA1-mediated acetylation of TP53, as described in [402]. Furthermore, resveratrol and pterostilbene significantly inhibited tumor growth, progression, local invasion and spontaneous metastasis in orthotopic prostate cancer xenografts, as shown in [402].

Resveratrol inhibited HDAC1, HDAC2, MTA1, MTA2 and MTA3 proteins of NuRD complex in DU145 prostate cancer cells and reactivated PTEN tumor suppressor by increasing its acetylation resulting in inhibition of AKT survival pathway in prostate cancer [58, 400]. Resveratrol was shown to induce autophagy by activating the NAD-dependent deacetylase, SIRTuin (SIRT)-1, as reviewed in [93]. However, other phenolic compounds found in red wine, including anthocyanins (oenin), stilbenoids (piceatannol), monophenols (caffeic acid, gallic acid) glucosides (delphinidin, kuronamin, peonidin) and flavonoids (catechin, epicatechin, quercetin, myricetin), were found to promote autophagy, and protein deacetylation [403]. Resveratrol targets the class III HDAC, such as SIRT1, SIRT2, SIRT3, as well as HAT, EP300 [403]. Resveratrol was shown to regulate cell death process of prostate cancer cells in vitro by global modulation of gene expression through deacetylation of FOXO transcription factor in human pancreatic and prostate cancer cells in vitro and in vivo [404-406].

The hydroxamic acid trichostatin A from the actinomycete Streptomyces hygroscopicus is a potent pan-HDAC inhibitor and was found to induce apoptosis through increase in BAX and CASP3 protein levels and decrease in telomerase (TERT) expression [407]. The depsipeptide FK228 (or Romidepsin) from Chromobacterium violaceum found to specifically target class I HDACs, inhibited tumor cell growth via apoptosis in human leukemic cells [408, 409]. Moreover, FK228 induced the autophagy pathway associated with the Apoptosis Inducible Factor, AIF) translocation from mitochondria to the nucleus [410]. The FDA approved this compound, under a trade name Istodax, for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, as reviewed in [93]. Ursodeoxycholic acid (Ursodiol) from metabolic bycompounds of intestinal bacteria was found to modulate histone acetylation and induce senescence and recently shown acting as a potential anticancer drug for colon cancer prevention [93, 411].

A variety of natural compounds have been identified as inhibitors of histone acetyltransferases/ deacetylases, and histone methyltransferases/demethylases, as reviewed in [93]. Furthermore, many following natural compounds from plants, fungi and marine organisms could potentially modulate epigenetic enzymes involved in histone modifications [93]. Curcumin has been shown to alter stability of certain HAT proteins through a proteasome-dependent degradation of EP300 and CBP proteins without affecting histone acetyl transferase 2B (KAT2B or PCAF) and GCN5, as reviewed in [93, 412]. Curcumin effectively blocks histone hyperacetylation induced by the HDAC inhibitor MS-275 in prostate cancer PC3-M cells [412]. Inhibition of EP300/CBP activity by curcumin suppresses acetylation of histone and TP53 proteins [273, 413]. Human hepatoma cells treated with to curcumin exhibited a dramatic decrease in HAT activity [88]. The expression of HDAC1, HDAC3, and HDAC8 proteins was decreased, while the acetylated histone H4 level was increased in Raji cells upon curcumin exposure [414]. Human medulloblastoma cells (DAOY, D283 Med, and D341) exposed to curcumin, exhibit induction of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, and reduced HDAC4 expression, increased tubulin acetylation, which eventually caused a mitotic catastrophe [415]. Curcumin also reduced growth of medulloblastoma xenografts tumors in Smo/Smo transgenic medulloblastoma mouse model, significantly increasing mouse survival [416]. Curcumin was also reported to induce downregulation of EZH2 through activation of MAPK, JNK, ERK, and p38 MAPK, leading to anti-proliferative effects in human breast cancer cells [416].

Polyphenols abundant in vegetables, fruits, cereals, wine and tea were found to induce the SIRT1 deacetylase activity [417, 418]. EGCG, epicatechin galate and myricetin increased endogenous SIRT1 level, while quercetin was found to activate a recombinant SIRT1 activity [417, 418]. Quercetin was found to block a proliferation of colon cancer RKO cells in vitro by inhibit DNMT1 activity leading to a reverse in the hypermethylation of CDKN2A (p16INK4a) gene promoter DNA [419]. Quercetin has been shown to inhibit the EP300/CBP activity and phosphorylation/ acetylation of histone H3 [420]. EGCG decreased HDAC activity leading to elevated levels of histone H3-Lys 9 and H3-Lys14 and histone H4-Lys5, H4-Lys12, and H4-Lys16, but decreased levels of methylated histone H3-Lys 9 [421]. EGCG triggered upregulation of the RAF kinase inhibitor by inhibiting HDAC activity, which further increased the H3 histone expression [421].

EGCG reactivated the Tissue Inhibitor of matrix MetalloProteinase-3 (TIMP3) gene expression in human MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells [422]. The polyphenols (e.g. EGCG) further reduced EZH2 and class I HDAC levels. Studies showed the EGCG-mediated decrease in EZH2 and histone H3K27, and increase in H3K9/18 acetylation at the TIMP-3 promoter [422]. Green tea polyphenols induced TP53-dependent downstream targets CDKN1A and BAX in human prostate cancer LNCaPshV cells [422]. These compounds also inhibited class I HDAC protein level, while induced acetylated histone H3 level associated with chromatin subsequently activation of the CDKN1A and BAX gene promoter activities [423-425]. The polycomb group proteins enhance cell survival by epigenetically regulating gene expression [426]. Increased levels and enhanced activity of polycomb complex proteins lead to increased methylation and reduced acetylation of the histones associated with tumor suppressor genes, causing reduced tumor suppressor activity and increased cell proliferation and survival [426]. Increased expression of key polycomb proteins, BMI1 and EZH2, was found in both immortalized keratinocytes and skin cancer cell lines [427]. EGCG treatment of SCC-13 skin cancer cells reduced BMI1 and EZH2 protein levels, and global reduction in histone H3K27 trimethylation [427].

Isoflavones, genistein, and daidzein, were shown to increase estrogen receptor-mediated core histone acetylation through inducing the activities of HAT and steroid receptor co-activator 2 (SRC2), as indicated in [428]. Genistein activated the CDKN1A and CDKN2A gene expression in human prostate cancer cells through upregulation of the HAT expression, while blocked HDAC6 [429, 430]. Genistein also promoted demethylation and acetylation of histone H3-K9 at the PTEN and CYLD promoters, as well as induced acetylation of histone H3K9 on the TP53 and FOXO3A gene promoters through reduction of SIRT1 activity [431]. Subsequently, the genistein-induced expression of tumor suppressor genes, TP53 and FOXO3 led to an inhibition of the AKT signaling pathway [431]. Genistein was also reported to induce expression of the DicKKopf-related protein-1 (DKK1) gene by acetylation of histone H3 at the DKK1 promoter region in colorectal adenocarcinoma cells (HCT15 and SW480), as described [432]. Genistein activated phosphorylated TP53 and ATM levels, leading to CDKN1A induction and histone γH2AX formation [433].

Epigenetic effects of many isothiocyanates from cruciferous plants (Brassicaceae) have been linked to the inhibition of HDAC activity and histone hyperacetylation [300, 434]. In addition, isothiocyanates could alter histone methylation modifications [434, 435]. Sulphorafane decreased the HDAC3 and HDAC6 protein expression in HCT116 colon cancer cells, leading to acetylation of histone H4 and tubulin, respectively [435]. Since HDAC3 is a key component for maintaining chromatin structure and undergo DNA repair, the potential ability for sulphorafane to affect HDAC3 is critical for chromatin integrity, mitotic spindle assembly, and DNA replication [374]. In APCMin/+ mouse model, the sulforaphane treatment reduced a cancer formation (by 40%) and increased global histone acetylation and increased association of acetylated histone H3 on the CDKN1A and BAX gene promoters leading to an increased expression of these genes [436, 437]. Sulforaphane reduced the polycomb group protein (BMI1, EZH2) expression in SCC-13 skin cancer cells and decreased histone H3K27 level through a proteasome-dependent degradation [438]. Human prostate cancer LNCaP cells exposed to phenethyl isothiocyanate exhibited also decreased the activity of HDACs, while inducing a specific histone acetylation and methylation [439].

Cruciferous vegetables also contain glucoraphanin (the precursor of sulphorafane), and glucobrassicin (the precursor of indole-3-carbinol), and its acid condensation compound, 3,3'-diindolylmethane [440]. Indole-3-carbinol increased ATM-dependent TP53 phosphorylation leading to CDKN1A expression and cell cycle arrest at the G1 phase in human breast cancer cells [440]. Diindolylmethane was shown to selectively induce a proteasomal degradation of HDAC1, HDAC2, HDAC3, and HDAC8 proteins without affecting class II HDAC proteins in human colon cancer cells in vitro and in vivo [441]. The alterations in HDAC1, HDAC2, and HDAC3 levels led to an increased expression of CDKN1A (p21) and CDKN1B (p27) genes and subsequently to cell cycle arrest and DNA damage in cancer cells [441]. Diindolylmethane caused a significant increase in γH2AX level and phosphorylation of tripartite motif-containing-28 protein (also known as transcriptional intermediary factor 1β, or KRAB-associated protein-1) prior to DNA damage-triggered apoptosis [87, 441].

Organosulfur compounds from Allium sativum (such as diallyl sulfide, diallyl disulfide and diallyl trisulfide) inhibited growth of cancer cells by causing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, inhibits angiogenesis and suppresses metastasis [442, 443]. Treatment of DS19 mouse erythroleukemia cells with allyl isothiocyanate (from black mustard Brassica nigra or brown Indian mustard Brassica juncea) increased the histone acetylation [444]. Diallyl disulfide and S-allylmercaptocysteine were found to induce histone acetylation and inhibited growth in mouse erythroleukemia DS19 cells [444, 445]. Diallyl disulfide caused an increased global acetylation of histones H3 and H4 leading to upregulated binding of acetylated histone H3 to the CDKN1A gene promoter, subsequently leading to an increase in the CDKN1A expression, cell cycle arrest and HDAC inhibition [446, 447]. S-allylmercaptocysteine and diallyl disulfide induced acetylation of histone H3K14 in human colon cancer cells (Caco-2 and HT-29) and human breast cancer T47D cells [446-448].

Parthenolide, a sesquiterpene lactone from Tanacetum parthenium, was found to induce cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis, as well as downregulate HDAC1 level via a proteasome-dependent degradation [449-451]. Psammaplin A, a natural compound isolated from marine sponges, exhibits anticancer activity against several human cancer cell lines [213, 452-455]. As a natural prodrug that inhibits class I histone deacetylase, Psammaplin A decreased SIRT1 protein level and activity, as well as acetylation of TP53 in doxorubicin-resistant MCF-7/adr human breast cancer cells [454, 455]. The anacardic acid (6-pentadecyl salicylic acid from cashew nut shell liquid) was found acting as a potent inhibitor of EP300 and CBP-associated HAT activities [87, 456]. The cyclic tetrapeptide 1-alaninechlamydocin from a fungi Tolypocladium sp. showed the tumor-inhibitory effects on pancreatic cancer MIA PaCa-2 cells of via inhibition of HDAC activity [457].

Triptolide from Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F was found to induce apoptosis in human multiple myeloma cells through downregulation of c-MYC and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) expression by blocking the accumulation of histone H3K4me3 on their promoters, as described elsewhere [458, 459]. Treatment with triptolide (minnelide) or siRNA-mediated silencing of Heat Shock Factor-1 (HSF1) gene expression disrupts the cytosolic complex between HSF1 protein, transitional endoplasmic reticulum ATPase (TER ATPase, also known as valosin-containing protein, or p97), heat shock protein (HSP)-90 and HDAC6, as indicated in [460]. Triptolide suppressed growth of human prostate cancer PC-3 cells and reduced the EZH2 expression, as described in [461]. PC-3 cells exposed to triptolide further exhibited upregulation in the ADRB2, CDH1, CDKN2A and DAB2IP expression modulated by EZH2 [461]. Triptolide suppressed the proliferation of multiple myeloma cells by inducing cell cycle arrest in G0/G1 phase and apoptosis [462]. Triptolide suppressed the expression of dimethylated histone H3K4, dimethylated histone H3K9 and dimethylated histone H3K36 by altering the expression of histone demethylases LSD1 and JMJD2B [462]. Triptolide blocked TNF-induced ubiquitination, phosphorylation, and degradation of IκBα, the inhibitor of NF-κB and inhibited acetylation of p65 subunit of NF-κB through suppression of binding of p65 to CBP/p300, as indicated in [463]. Triptolide also inhibited the IκBα kinase (IKK) that activates NF-κB and phosphorylation of p65 at the positions S276 and S536, as described in [463]. Furthermore, the NF-κB reporter activity induced by TNF-TNFR1-TRADD-TRAF2-NIK-TAK1-IKKβ was blocked by triptolide [463]. Triptolide also inhibited the TNF-induced expression of XIAP, BCL-xL, BCL-2, survivin, cIAP-1 and cIAP-2, as well as CCND1, c-MYC and COX-2, and metastasis proteins (e.g. ICAM-1 and MMP-9), as described in [463].

Selenoproteins and organoselenium metabolites as accumulated forms of selenium found in Brazil nuts and seafood were shown to exhibit inhibitory effects on cancer cells [464]. Some forms of organoselenium metabolites (e.g. sodium selenite, keto-methylselenobutyrate, methyl selenocysteine, and methyl selenopyruvate) were found to modulate gene expression through inducing histone PTMs. For example, they were shown to decrease of HDAC activity and increase of histone acetylation, and phosphorylation [465, 466]. Selenomethionine was observed to induce the specific phosphorylation of histones located at the DNA promoter sequence of GJB2 (connexin 26) and SKG1 (serum glucocorticoid kinase-1) genes [467].

Sinapinic acid extracted from Hydnophytum formicarum Jack rhizome was shown to inhibit HDAC activity, thereby blocking proliferation of several human cancer cell lines [468]. The epipolythiodioxopiperazine fungal metabolite, Chaetocin from Chaetomium minutum, is found to specifically inhibit the human histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SUV39H1, a human homolog of Drosophila SU (VAR) 3-9 protein [469]. Verticillin A from Verticillium sp. is a promising selective inhibitor of histone methyltransferases SUV39H1, SUV39H2, and G9a/GLP decreased H3K9me3 levels in the FAS promoter and restored FAS expression thereby inhibiting in colon carcinoma growth in vivo, as described elsewhere [470].

SHORT NON-CODING MICRORNAS AND NATURAL COMPOUNDS

The short non-coding RNAs, namely microRNA (miRNA), play special roles in epigenetic regulation of gene expression at the post-transcriptional and post-translational levels, as reviewed elsewhere [471, 472]. These short microRNAs (17-25 base pairs in length) often inhibit translation and/or induce degradation of their target mRNAs, thereby ultimately decrease the expression of certain genes [472]. Similarly to mRNA production, microRNAs are transcribed RNA polymerases II and III; however, they are encoded by the exons and introns of non-coding genes, as well as by the introns of protein-coding genes [473]. MicroRNAs are sequentially processed from longer precursor molecules into mature microRNA molecules, as reviewed in [473]. Primary microRNA transcripts (pri-microRNAs) are processed in the nucleus by the RNA-Induced Silencing Complex (RISC) to generate mature microRNAs [474, 475]. The pri-microRNAs contain one or more ~ 7 base pairs stem-loop structures. The ribonuclease DROSHA removes the stem-loop structures to form the precursor microRNAs (or pre-microRNAs) [474, 475]. Finally, the ribonuclease DICER processes pre-miRNA (exported from nuclei to the cytoplasm) into a short RNA duplex [474]. After untwisting, one RNA strand becomes the mature single-stranded microRNA, while the complementary strand is usually rapidly degraded [471-475].

Mature microRNAs form complementary duplexes with their mRNA targets based on specific sequences usually within the 3′-untranslated region (UTR) of the target mRNA [476]. Interestingly, one microRNA could potentially inhibit several mRNAs, while a few microRNAs were found to modulate the same mRNA target expression [476]. More than 1000 human microRNAs have been identified so far, which enable them regulate a large percentage of genes, however, the database of microRNAs and their potential target genes is growing rapidly [477]. MicroRNA-modulated changes in gene expression appear to be heritable, therefore contributing to epigenetic regulation of cellular functions [474, 477]. Aberrant microRNA regulation associated with cancer development can be influenced by DNA methylation and histone PTMs, however, various microRNAs could regulate the expression of multiple enzymes involved in the epigenetic molecular mechanisms [472, 477-480].

MicroRNAs were found to control a plethora of molecular and cellular functions, such as cell proliferation, apoptosis, cancer development, cell cycle, and immunity, as reviewed in [481, 482]. MicroRNA gene expression is altered in various human cancers, and specific microRNAs have shown the oncogenic, tumor-suppressive or apoptotic potential, as reviewed in [481, 482]. Several microRNAs were found to control epigenetic regulatory components involved in transcription, as well as affect cellular metabolism, cell death, cell cycle arrest, autophagy and senescence, and contribute to epithelial stem cell maturation, as reviewed in [481, 482]. Some microRNAs were recently shown to directly bind the promoter sequences and gene 3’-end sequences, and were able to modulate gene transcription [483-485]. On the other hand, tumor cells often exhibit deregulated transcription of specific microRNA genes, which links to tumorigenesis, and microRNA profiles are often used to test the appearance of human cancer cells [484, 485]. Modulatory effects of microRNA on the epigenetic machinery, as well as the reciprocal epigenetic control of microRNA genes suggests that their deregulation might have important implications for global regulation of epigenetics in cancer cells, as reviewed in [473, 478, 479]. Accumulating evidence shows that various natural compounds exhibited an ability to affect microRNA expression in cancer cells, thus making these compounds a new source of potential anticancer drug agents, which could contribute to a development of novel therapeutic approaches for cancer chemoprevention, as reviewed in [89, 486-489].

Cucumin deregulated the expression of 29 microRNAs in human pancreatic carcinoma BxPC-3 cells [490]. Curcumin-induced upregulation of miR-22 was further found to suppress the expression of its target genes SP1 (specificity protein 1) and ESR1 (estrogen receptor 1) transcription factors [490]. Curcumin was shown to promote apoptosis in A549/DDP multidrug-resistant human lung adenocarcinoma cells by decreasing the miR-186 level, which in turn led to upregulation of CASP-10 level [491]. Curcumin was reported to decrease BCL-2 expression in human breast cancer MCF-7 cells by inducing miR-15a and miR-16 levels [492]. Curcumin was found to suppress miR-21 levels that led to a decrease in invasiveness and metastatic capabilities of human colon cancer RKO and HCT116 cells [493]. The miR-21 gene promoter region contains a few binding sites for the AP-1 transcription factor, and curcumin reduces the binding of AP-1 to the miR-21 promoter, while inducing the expression of the tumor suppressive ProgrammeD Cell Death protein 4 (PDCD4), which is a known target for miR-21 [493]. Curcumin reduced the miR-21 and miR-34a levels (known to affect NOTCH1), and induced let-7a miRNA level in esophageal cancer cell lines [494]. Curcumin was recently reported to inhibit a growth of prostate carcinoma in vivo through decreasing the miR-208 level, and subsequently leading to CDKN1A upregulation [495]. In mouse xenograft model of colorectal cancer, both curcumin and 3 acetyl-11-keto-β-boswellic acid inhibited tumor growth, associated with alterations in the miR-34a and miR-27a levels, confirming previous observations with in vitro studies [496]. Curcumin exposure triggered the induction of the TP53-miR-192-5p/215-XIAP pathway and apoptosis in non-small cell lung cancer cells [497]. Curcumin-mediated induction of miR-9 that leads to a modulation of AKT/FOXO1 axis underlies the cytotoxic effect of the drug against SKOV3 ovarian cancer cells [498]. Curcumin was also shown affecting the miR-19/PTEN/ AKT/p53 axis and decreasing a bisphenol A-induced cell proliferation, as well as inducing miR-181b and preventing metastasis via down-regulation of the inflammatory cytokines CXCL-1 and -2 in breast cancer cells in vitro and in vivo [499, 500].

Resveratrol (trans-3, 4', 5-trihydroxystilbene) was found to variably increase the levels of 22 microRNA, and decrease the levels of 26 microRNAs in human SW480 colon cancer cells [501]. Several microRNAs downregulated by resveratrol were oncogenic microRNAs (e.g. miR-21, miR-25, and miR-92a-2) and are overexpressed in colorectal cancer [501]. However, the tumor suppressing miR-16-1 was also downregulated by resveratrol [501]. In silico analysis showed that resveratrol deregulated microRNAs could potentially target known tumor suppressor genes (MLH3, MSH2 and MSH3, PDCD4 and PTEN), as well as critical effectors of the TGFβ signaling pathway, and a regulator of microRNA processing, DICER1 [501]. Resveratrol inhibited glioma cell proliferation inducing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in vitro [502, 503]. Resveratrol was reported to markedly downregulate miR-21, miR-30a-5p and miR-19, and altered the expression of their mRNA targets known to act as critical regulators for initiation and progression of gliomas (e.g. TP53, PTEN, EGFR, STAT3, COX2, NF-κB and members of PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway), as described elsewhere [502, 503]. Resveratrol was also shown to inhibit the migration/invasion in human osteosarcomas in vitro and lung metastasis in vivo by suppressing Matrix MetalloProteinase-2 (MMP2) [504]. Resveratrol modulated the MMP2 transcription through reducing the ability for CREB protein to bind DNA specific elements [504]. Moreover, miR-328 was predominantly upregulated in human osteosarcoma cells after resveratrol treatment [504]. Silencing of miR-328 significantly reduced the suppressing effect of resveratrol on the MMP2 expression and cell motility, while the forced miR-328 expression decreased MMP2 expression and invasive abilities [504].

Resveratrol induced the cytotoxicity and apoptosis of human bladder cancer cells (T24 and 5637 cells) in a dose-dependent manner [505]. While inducing apoptosis resveratrol decreased the miR-21 level, and subsequently the phosphorylated AKT and BCL2 protein levels in human pancreatic cancer cells (PANC-1, CFPAC-1 and MIA Paca-2), as described in [505, 506]. Based on microRNA microarray studies, resveratrol was found to reduce the expression of various prostate-tumor associated microRNAs, including miR-21 in androgen-receptor negative and highly aggressive human prostate cancer cells (PC-3M-MM2), as described elsewhere [507]. Resveratrol was also shown to upregulate the expression of PDCD4 and maspin (encoded by SERPINB5 gene), which were known targets for miR-21 [507]. Twenty-three miRNAs were significantly downregulated and twenty-eight miRNAs were markedly upregulated in prostate cancer cells after resveratrol treatment [508]. Among downregulated miRNAs, miR-17-92 and miR-106ab clusters were oncogenic miRNAs, while the upregulated miRs included several tumor suppressors [508, 509]. miR-17, miR-20a, miR-20b, miR-106a and miR106b were shown to target PTEN expression [509]. Resveratrol and pterostilbene were shown to decrease the levels of endogenous and exogenously expressed miR-17, miR-20a and miR-106b, thereby upregulating their target PTEN [509]. Furthermore, pterostilbene rescued PTEN levels leading to reduced tumor growth in vivo through downregulation of miR-17-5p and miR-106a-5p expression in tumors and systemic circulation [509].

Resveratrol was found beneficial against dextran sodium sulfate-induced colitis-associated tumorigenesis in the Apc (Min/+) mice [510]. Treatment of mice bearing colitis tumors with resveratrol led to a decreased number and size of polyps, and inhibition of proliferation of intestinal mucosa epithelial cells compared with control mice [510]. Among 104 microRNAs, whose expression was altered in the intestinal tissue of resveratrol-treated mice, miRNA-101b and miRNA-455 were validated to increase their levels upon resveratrol treatment [510]. A combination of resveratrol and quercetin decreased miR-27a level leading to an increasing expression of zinc finger protein repressor ZBTB10 known to suppress SP activity [511]. Piceatannol, a naturally occurring analog of resveratrol from roots of Picea abies, was shown to induce apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells (HCT116 and HT29) through upregulation of miR-129 levels, and downregulation of BCL2 level, as indicated in [512]. Knockdown of miR-129 counteracted the negative effect of piceatannol on viability of HCT116 and HT29 cells [512]. Resveratrol, EGCG, and α-mangostin were shown to induce apoptosis and suppress the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway [513]. Additionally, α-mangostin also suppressed MAPK/ERK1/2 signaling in human colon cancer DLD-1 cells [513]. Interestingly, resveratrol increased the miR-34a expression level leading to a downregulation of target protein E2F3 and its downstream SIRT1 resulting in growth inhibition [513].

EGCG treatment upregulated thirteen microRNAs and downregulated forty-eight microRNAs in human hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cells [514]. The potential target proteins for the upregulated microRNAs were - RAS, BCL2, E2F, TGFBR2 and c-KIT, while for downregulated microRNAs were - PTEN, SMAD, MCL1, SLC16A1, TTK, PRPS1, ZNF513, and SNX19 [517]. While EGCG decreased the level of an anti-apoptotic BCL-2 protein, the transfection with miR-16 inhibitor counteracted this effect by inducing apoptosis [514]. EGCG was found to upregulate the transcription of miR-210, which led to a reduced cell proliferation and anchorage-independent growth in vitro and in tobacco carcinogen-induced lung tumors in A/J mice in vivo [515, 516]. EGCG and Polyphenon® E downregulated the expression levels of miR-25, miR-92, miR-141, and miR-200a (known to target TP53) in human multiple myeloma cells [517]. Polyphenon-60 from green tea significantly downregulated the expression of miR-21 and miR-27 in human breast cancer MCF-7 cells [518]. EGCG enhanced apoptotic-inducing effect of cisplatin on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) A549 cells by downregulating miR-98-5p and miR-125a-3p levels and activation of TP53 protein [519]. Combination of N- (4-hydroxyphenyl) retinamide and (-)-EGCG dramatically reduced the levels of oncogenic miR-92, miR-93, and miR-106b, and increased expression of tumor suppressing miR-7-1, miR-34a, and miR-99a in human malignant neuroblastoma SK-N-BE2 and IMR-32 cells [520].

Isoflavonoids were shown modulating expression of target genes in human prostate cancer by microRNAs, as reviewed in [262, 263]. Genistein and daidzein were found deregulating expression profiles of several microRNAs in human PC-3, DU 145, and LNCaP prostate cancer cell lines [262, 263]. While miR-15b, -125a, -125b, -155, -208b, -211, -320, -376a, -411, -520g and -542-5p were downregulated, miR-15a and miR-548b were upregulated [96, 262, 263]. Although miR-145 is silenced by promoter methylation in prostate cancer, genistein in combination with decitabine, was able to re-express miR-145, as indicated [262, 263]. Genistein was reported to induce expression of miR-1296; the latter is known to be downregulated in human prostate cancer specimens [521]. Forced expression of miR-1296 mimic significantly reduced the MiniChromosome Maintenance-2 (MCM2) gene expression [521]. Genistein also downregulated miR-221/222 expression thereby up-regulating Aplasia Ras Homolog member I (ARHI, Ras-related small G-protein) levels, suggesting the role of epigenetic regulation of ARHI expression in anticancer effects of genistein [522]. Genistein markedly reduced miR-151 expression in human prostate cancer PC-3 cells, thereby modulating the level of the miR-151 targets SRY-Related HMG-BOX Transcription Factor-17 (SOX17) and Aplysia RAS-Related Epididymis Secretory Sperm Binding Protein (ARHGDIA, Rho GDP Dissociation Inhibitor-alpha), as indicated in [523]. Treatment of human prostate cancer cells with a mixture of genistein, daidzein and glycitein led to a promoter demethylation and increased levels of miR-29a and miR-1256 [262, 263]. Genistein significantly decreased expression of oncogenic miR-1260b in renal and prostate cancer cell lines [524, 525]. Knockdown of miR-1260b decreased proliferation, invasion ability and increased apoptosis in PC-3 cells [524, 525]. Genistein treatment leads to upregulation of Secreted Frizzled-Related Protein (SFRP)-1 and SMAD family member 4 protein, which are reported to be targets of miR-1260b, thereby reducing the levels of H3K9me2, -me3 and H3K27me3 at the SFRP1 and SMAD4 gene promoters [525].

Genistein treatment was reported to significantly inhibit oncogenic miR-223 expression and upregulated the expression of the F-Box and WD repeat domain containing-7 (FBW7) E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, which is one of the miR-223 targets in pancreatic cancer cells [526]. Moreover, silencing of miR-223 reduced tumor cell growth and promoted apoptotic cell death in pancreatic cancer cells [526]. Genistein was found to induce the expression of miR-574-3p in human prostate cancer cells leading to inhibition of cell proliferation, migration and invasion in vitro and in vivo [527]. The miR-574-3p mimic induced apoptosis by modulating BCL-XL level and increasing the levels of activated CASP3 and CASP9 proteins [527]. MiR-574-3p was shown to target the expression of several target genes (RAC1, EGFR and EP300) in vitro [528]. Genistein was found to inhibit the growth and migration of ovarian cancer cells, pancreatic cancer cells and uveal melanoma cells through a downregulation of miR-27a expression leading to an increased expression of the Sprouty homolog-2 protein (encoded by SPRY2 gene), a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor and putative miR-27a target gene [529-531]. Genistein also inhibited expression of oncogenic miR-23b-3p and reactivation of its target PTEN in renal cell carcinoma cell lines [531].

Claudin-2 (CLDN2) expression is upregulated in human lung adenocarcinomas in vitro and in vivo, while silencing of its expression leads to reduced cell proliferation and migration of tumor cells suggesting that claudin-2 is a potential target for lung adenocarcinoma [532]. Quercetin increases the expression of miR-16 leading to downregulation of claudin-2 protein level, miR-16 inhibitor reverted this effect in lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells [532]. Upon quercetin exposure miR-34a level was upregulated in human hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cells (expressing wild-type TP53 protein) [533]. Downregulaiton of miR-34a led to resistance of tumor cells to quercetin exposure, while exhibiting the increased level of SIRT1, and decreased level of acetylated TP53 suggesting a TP53/miR-34a/SIRT1 signal feedback loop [533]. Quercetin in combination with cisplatin suppresses growth and invasiveness, as well as upregulates the expression of miR-217 leading to a downregulation of the miR-217 target KRAS in human osteosarcoma cells (143B) [534].

Triptolide, a diterpenoid epoxide from Tripterygium wilfordii, was reported to inhibit a pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cell growth in vitro and decrease metastasis in vivo [535]. Both triptolide and quercetin upregulate miR-142-3p in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells (MIA PaCa-2, Capan-1, and S2-013), as indicated in [535]. Ectopic expression of miR-142-3p inhibited cell proliferation, and decreased the expression of its target, heat shock protein-70 in tested pancreatic cancer cells in vitro [535]. Minnelide, a water-soluble prodrug of triptolide, induced the expression of miR-142-3p in non-small cell lung carcinoma and in a xenograft model of mesothelioma in vivo [536, 537]. Ellagitannins derived from pomegranate, raspberries, walnuts and almonds exhibit potent anticancer properties [538]. Ellagitannin BJA3121 from Balanophora japonica reduced a proliferation of in liver cancer cells and upregulated of miR-let-7e, miR-370, miR-373 and miR-526b levels, while downregulated of let-7a, let-7c, let-7d levels [539]. Olea europaea leaf extract induced anti-proliferative effects and altered the expression levels of miR-181b, miR-153, miR-145, miR-137, and let-7d in human glioblastoma T98G cells [540].

Honokiol (HNK) from Magnolia grandiflora was shown to reduce a tumor growth of leptin-induced breast cancer, its invasiveness and migration properties in vivo [541]. HNK was found to repress Wnt1-MTA1-β-catenin signaling in vitro and in vivo [544]. HNK decreased STAT3 phosphorylation, and inhibited its recruitment to the miR-34a promoter [541]. 3,3'-diindolylmethane upregulated let-7 microRNA level and downregulated EZH2 level in human prostate cancer cells [542]. Both 3,3'-diindolylmethane and genistein caused upregulation of let-7b, let-7e, miR-200b, and miR-200c in gemcitabine-resistant human pancreatic cancer cells [543]. The potential targets of these microRNAs were E-cadherin, an epithelial cell marker and mesenchymal markers, Zinc Finger E-Box Binding Homeobox 1 (ZEB1) and vimentin (VIM) suggesting that diindolylmethane could influence the invasion capacity of pancreatic cancer cells through a microRNAs [543]. Diindolylmethane upregulated miR-146 level, and reduced the levels of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), MTA2 metastasis associated 1 family, member 2 (MTA2) and members of the NF-kB signaling pathway in pancreatic cancer cells [544].

CONCLUSION

“Over 60% of the currently used anti-cancer drugs come from the natural compounds derived from plants, fungi and marine organisms” [545]. Natural compounds with anticancer activities derived from various habitats have been shown to modulate multiple molecular targets affecting numerous “signaling and regulatory pathways ultimately leading to tumor cell death” [546, 547]. They affect numerous targets including transcriptional factors, epigenetic regulators, regulators of mammalian target of rapamycin pathway, intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis, cell cycle regulators, ligand-dependent receptor activators, and oxidative stress modulators leading to cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, necroptosis, and autophagy [264, 542, 548]. Molecular mechanisms controlling cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, autophagy and necroptosis are closely related, so targeting these pathways simultaneously may help to induce the cell death of cancer cells and overcome the resistance of tumor cells to anticancer drugs [344-550].

“Currently, there are more than 200 naturally produced drugs already in preclinical/clinical development or in the clinic”, as reviewed elsewhere [545, 546]. Promising anti-cancer agents were obtained from plants (vincristine, vinblastine, etoposide, paclitaxel, camptothecin, topotecan and irinotecan), marine organisms (citarabine, aplidine and dolastatin) and microorganisms (dactinomycin, bleomycin and doxorubicin). In addition, other natural compounds that can be used in anticancer therapy were purified from fruits and vegetables. They include: curcumin (turmeric), resveratrol (red grapes, peanuts and berries), genistein (soybean), diallyl sulfide (allium), S-allyl cysteine (allium), allicin (garlic), lycopene (tomato), capsaicin (red chilli), diosgenin (fenugreek), 6-gingerol (ginger), ellagic acid (pomegranate), ursolic acid (apple, pears, prunes), silymarin (milk thistle), anethol (anise, camphor, and fennel), catechins (green tea), eugenol (cloves), indole-3-carbinol (cruciferous vegetables), and limonene (citrus fruits), as reviewed elsewhere [545-549].

A number of studies have shown that specific natural compounds, such as curcumin, EGCG, resveratrol, sulforaphane, gallic acid, genistein and 3,3'-diindolylmethane altering epigenetic processes, including DNA methylation, histone modification, chromatin remodeling, microRNA regulation and targeting cancer stem cells [82, 83, 86, 87, 89-96, 133, 153, 213, 269, 272, 434, 442, 486-489, 550]. The (Table 1) summarizes known natural compounds found to affect activity of numerous epigenetic enzymes. The

Table 1.

Categorization of natural compounds affecting epigenetic functions in cancer cells.

Compound Name Epigenetic Function References
Curcumin Induces TP63, MAX; inhibits NF-κB, OCT4, NANOG, SOX2, c-MYC, NOTCH1, c-JUN, c-FOS, STAT3, FOXO3A; inhibits HDAC1; inhibits DNMT1; reverses methylation of the NRF2 promoter; decreases MECP2 binding to the NEUROG1 promoter; alters stability of certain HAT proteins through a proteasome-dependent degradation of EP300 and CBP proteins; inhibits the expression of HDAC1, HDAC3, HDAC4, and HDAC8 proteins; downregulates EZH2 through activation of MAPK, JNK, ERK, and p38 MAPK; upregulates let-7a, miR-9, miR-15, miR-16, miR-22, miR-181b; downregulates miR-21, miR-27a, miR-34a, miR-186, miR-208; activates the p53-miR-192-5p/215-XIAP pathway; modulates miR-19/PTEN/AKT/p53 axis. [92, 111-117, 125, 152-155, 292, 293-296, 404, 406-408, 482-492]
Resveratrol Inhibits HIF1a, NANOG, SOX2, OCT4, c-MYC; targets the class III HDAC (SIRT1, SIRT2, SIRT3), as well as HAT (EP300); deacetylates FOXO transcription factor; enhances TP53 protein acetylation and inhibits MTA1/NuRD protein complex; inhibits HDAC1 and HDAC2; downregulates oncogenic miR17-92, miR-106a-363 and miR-106b-25 clusters, miR-19, miR-21, miR-25, miR-30a-5p, and miR-92a-2; upregulates miR-328. [58, 92, 150, 151, 152-155, 402-404, 493-499, 501]
Epigallocatechin-3-gallate Induces TP53, stimulates p38 MAPK and JNK; inhibits NF-κB, AP-1, ATF-2, CREB, and HIF1α, STAT3, NANOG, SOX2, OCT4, c-MYC; activates NRF2; inhibits DNMT and reactivates gene expression; reduces HDAC and DNMT expression; stimulates SIRT1 activity; decreased HDAC activity and increased levels of acetylated lysine 9 and 14 on histone H3 (H3-Lys 9 and 14) and acetylated lysine 5, 12 and 16 on histone H4 but decreased levels of methylated histone H3-Lys 9; reduces EZH2 and class I HDAC protein levels; reduces BMI1 and EZH2 protein levels, and histone H3K27 trimethylation; upregulates thirteen microRNAs and downregulates forty-eight microRNAs; the potential target proteins for the upregulated microRNAs were - RAS, BCL2, E2F, TGFBR2 and c-KIT, while for downregulated microRNAs were - PTEN, SMAD, MCL1, SLC16A1, TTK, PRPS1, ZNF513, and SNX19; upregulates miR-210, reduces the TP53-targeting microRNAs, including miR-25, miR-92, miR-141, and miR-200a; downregulates miR-98-5p and miR-125a-3p levels and activation of TP53; decreases expression of oncogenic miR-92, miR-93, and miR-106b, and increases expression of tumor suppressing miR-7-1, miR-34a, and miR-99a. [118-125, 140-144, 152-155, 275-284, 409, 414, 415, 418, 419, 424, 504-507, 509, 510]
Chinese Qingyihuaji formula and BDL301 Inhibits NOTCH4, and JAG1, STAT3. [126, 127]
Ascochlorin Inhibits STAT3. [128]
Alantolactone Inhibits STAT3. [129, 130]
Ethyl acetate extract from Jiedu Xiaozheng Yin Suppresses polycomb complex member BMI1 and CTNNB1 signaling. [131, 132]
Phenethyl isothiocyanate Activates NRF2; phosphorylation of ERK and JNK; demethylates GSTP1 promoter, inhibits HDAC activity. [133-144, 306, 436]
Sulforaphane Activates NRF2; phosphorylation of ERK and JNK; decreases DNMT1 and DNMT3A activities; decreases the HDAC3 and HDAC6 protein expression; increases the global histone acetylation and increases association of acetylated histone H3 on the CDKN1A and BAX gene promoters. [133-144, 302, 303, 432-434]
Indole-3-carbinol Inhibits NF-κB, stimulates TP53 and its targets, PUMA, APAF-1, PMAIP-1; increases ATM signaling and TP53 phosphorylation. [148, 437]
Cucurbitacin B Inhibits STAT3; represses DNMTs and HDACs; reactivates CDKN1A and CDKN2A expression. [156, 333]
Eurycomanone Inhibits NF-κB signaling through inhibition of IκBα phosphorylation. [157, 158]
Aaptamines Modulates AP-1, NF-κB, and TP53-dependent transcriptional activities [159]
Codonolactone Inhibits RUNX2. [160]
Hirsutine Inhibits NF-κB activation. [161]
Chebulagic acid Inhibits NF-κB. [162, 163]
Bergamottin Inhibits STAT3 signaling pathway. [164]
Ethyl acetate extract of Annona muricata Activates mitochondrial-mediated signaling and suppresses nuclear translocation of NF-κB. [165]
Isocudraxanthone K Induces Akt, p38 MAPK, and ERK phosphorylation, as well as downregulates of HIF-1α. [166]
Ethanolic extracts of P. indica root Activates TP53. [167]
Grifolin Activates TP53 and upregulates of DAPK1. [168]
Chalcones Modulates TP53, NF-κB, STAT3, AP-1, NRF2, and CTNNB1/WNT. [169]
Mahanine Induces nuclear accumulation of PTEN and its interaction with TP53/TP73 proteins. [170, 171]
Dehydroleucodine Induces the levels of total TP73 and phosphorylated TP53, TP73, and γ-H2AX [172]
Rocaglamide Upregulates of the TP53. [173, 174]
Anthocyanins/anthocyanidins Suppresses DNMT1. [266]
Genistein Inhibits DNMT1, 3A, 3B, MBD2 activities, and reactivates CDKN2A, MGMT, RARβ, BTG3, GSTP1, and WNT5A genes; activates HAT; targets HDAC6; demethylates and acetylates histone H3-K9 at the PTEN and CYLD promoters and acetylates histone H3-K9 on the TP53 and FOXO3A gene promoters through reduction of SIRT1 activity; upregulates let-7b, let-7e, miR-200b, miR-200c, miR-15a, miR-29a, miR-548b, miR-574-3p, miR-1256, miR-1296; downregulates miR-15b, -23b-3p, -27a, -125a, -125b, -145, -151, -155, -208b, -211, -223, -320, -376a, -411, -520g and -542-5p, -1260b. [96, 260, 261, 285-289, 425, 427, 428, 512, 514, 516-524]
Quercetin Reverses hypermethylation of CDKN2A gene; inhibits EP300/CBP activity and phosphorylation/ acetylation of histone H3; increases miR-16, miR-34a, 142-3p, miR-217 level. [290, 291, 416, 417, 525-528]
Retinoic acid Activates the CDKN1A gene transcription and inhibited AP-1 transcriptional activity; demethylates RARβ2 and PTEN gene promoters; reduces the expression of DNMT1 and DNMT3B, while induces the expression of microRNAs targeting the DNMT proteins. [83, 183, 309, 310, 329-332]
Z-Ligustilide Demethylates NRF2 gene promoter, and inhibits DNMT activity. [334]
Kazinol Q Inhibits DNMT activity. [335]
Annurca apple extract Increases TP53 expression; reduces promoter DNA methylation for MLH1, ARF1, and CDKN2A genes. [337]
Psammaplin A, aerothionin, aeroplysinin-1, dienone, and bastadins Inhibit HDAC and DNMT; decrease SIRT1 enzyme activity and reduce SIRT1 protein expression; increase the expression of a p53-induced damage-regulated autophagy modulator. [339, 452]
Parthenolide Inhibits NF-κB activation, promotes ubiquitination of MDM2 and activates TP53; decreases DNMT1 expression; downregulates HDAC1 protein. [340-347, 446, 447, 452]
Verticillin A Inhibits DNA methylation of BNIP3 gene promoter; inhibits histone methyltransferases SUV39H1, SUV39H2, and G9a/GLP and decreases H3K9me3 levels in the FAS promoter. [348, 461]
Folate, cobalamin, riboflavin, pirydoxine or methionine) Regulate the DNA methylation reaction by having a direct effect on the level of a methyl donor, SAM. [349-355]
Trichostatin A Inhibits HDACs. [399]
Romidepsin Inhibits class I HDACs. [400, 401]
Diindolylmethane Induces a proteasomal degradation of HDAC1, HDAC2, HDAC3, and HDAC8 proteins; increases the γH2AX level and phosphorylation of tripartite motif-containing-28 protein; upregulates let-7 microRNA, and downregulates EZH2 expression; upregulates of let-7b, let-7e, miR-200b, and miR-200c; upregulates miR-146. [438, 511-513]
Organosulfur compounds: diallyl disulfide, S-allylmercaptocysteine Induce histone acetylation; increase a global acetylation of histones H3 and H4. [441, 442]
Anacardic acid Inhibits the EP300 and CBP-associated HAT activities. [87, 453]
1-Alaninechlamydocin Inhibits HDAC activity. [454]
Selenium and selenoproteins Decrease of HDAC activity and increase of histone acetylation and phosphorylation. [456-458]
Sinapinic acid Inhibits HDAC activity. [459]
Chaetocin Inhibits human histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SUV39H1. [460]
Piceatannol Induces miR-129 expression. [500]
Polyphenon-60 Downregulates the expression of miR-21 and miR-27. [508]
Triptolide Upregulates miR-142-3p. [528]
Minnelide Upregulates miR-142-3p. [529, 530]
Ellagitannin BJA3121 Upregulates miR-let-7e, miR-370, miR-373 and miR-526b, while downregulates let-7a, let-7c, let-7d microRNAs. [532]
Olea europaea leaf extract Modulates expression of miR-181b, miR-153, miR-145, miR-137, and let-7d. [533]

presented information suggests that natural compounds act at the multiple targets, transcription factors and chromatin accessory proteins, DNA methyltransferase, histone acetylases and deacetylases, histone methylases and demethylases, as well as microRNAs involved in development of many human cancers (Table 1).

Epigenetic drugs modulate the epigenetic regulatory mechanisms altered in tumor cells thereby enhancing abilities of epigenetic regulators to affect cell proliferation, migration and cell death, subsequently inducing cell cycle arrest, cell differentiation, or cell death via apoptosis, necrosis, autophagy or mitotic catastrophe in tumor cells, as well as tumor microenvironment, as reviewed elsewhere [550]. Thus, specific natural compounds might affect various protein targets implicated in epigenetic regulation of gene expression at the global and specific levels. However, further in-depth studies needed to define the contribution of epigenetic alterations induced by natural compounds in various human cancers. Better understanding of the epigenetic targets and pathways altered by natural compounds is required to generate novel strategies in anticancer chemotherapeutics, including their combinations with other anticancer biomolecules, such as microRNAs.

ACKNOWLEDGeMENTS

This work was supported in part by the Flight Attendant Research Institutions grant (#082469). E.A.R is a Distinguished Professor of the Prometeo Project of the Secretariat for Higher Education, Science, Technology and Innovation (SENESCYT) of the Republic of Ecuador. I am grateful to all faculty members and students of the Departamento de Ciencias de la Salud and Departamento de Química Aplicada (Universidad Technica Particular de Loja, Loja, Ecuador) for inspiring me to write this review.

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

AP

Activator Protein

ARHI

Aplasia Ras Homolog Member I

ARHGDIA

Aplysia RAS-Related Epididymis Secretory Sperm Binding Protein

APAF

Apoptotic Protease Activating Factor

ATM

Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated

ATR

ATM and Rad3 Related

CREBBP

cAMP Response Element-binding Factor (CREB)-binding Protein

C/EBPα

CCAAT/Enhancer Binding Protein alpha

CDKN1A

Cyclin-Dependent Kinase iNhibitor

CLDN2

Claudin-2

DAPK

Death-Associated Protein Kinase

DNMT

DNA Methyltransferase

EP300

E1A Binding Protein 300

EGFR

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor

EZH

Enhancer of Zeste Homolog

ERK

Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase

FBW7

F-Box and WD Repeat Domain Containing-7

ID4

Inhibitor of Differentiation 4

IRF

Interferon Regulatory Factor

JNK

c-Jun N-terminal Kinases

HAT

Histone AcetylTransferase

HDAC

Histone DeACetylase

HIF

Hypoxia-inducible Factor

KLF

Krüppel-Like Factor

LSD

Lysine-Specific Demethylase

MMP2

Matrix MetalloProteinase-2

MAPK

Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase

MBD

Methyl-CpG-Binding Domain

MDM2

Mouse Double Minute 2 Homolog

MITF

MIcrophthalmia-associated Transcription Factor

MAX

MYC-Associated factor X

MCM2

Nuclear Factor-kappaB, MiniChromosome Maintenance-2

MTA1

MTA2 Metastasis Associated 1 Family, Member 1

MTA2

MTA2 Metastasis Associated 1 Family, Member 2

MLH1

MutL Homolog-1

MGMT

O6-MethylGuanine DNA MethylTransferase, NF-κB

NRF2

Nuclear factor erythroid-2 (NF-E2)-Related Factor 2

NuRD

Nucleosome Remodeling Deacetylase complex

PCNA

Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen

PTEN

Phosphatase and TENsin Homolog

PMAIP

Phorbol-12-Myristate-13-Acetate-Induced Protein

PRMT

Protein aRginine MethylTransferase

PDCD4

ProgrammeD Cell Death Protein 4

PUMA

TP53 Upregulated Modulator of Apoptosis

RECK

REversion-inducing-Cysteine-rich Protein with Kazal Motifs

RB

Retinoblastoma Protein

RAR

Retinoic Acid Receptor

RUNX

Runt-related Transcription Factor

SAM

S-adenosyl-L-methionine

STAT

Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription

SOX17

SRY-Related HMG-BOX Transcription Factor-17

SREBP

Sterol Regulatory Element-Binding Protein

TIMP3

Tissue Inhibitor of matrix MetalloProteinase-3

TP53

Tumor protein p53

UHRF

Ubiquitin-like, Containing PHD and RING Finger Domains

UTR

Untranslated Region

VIM

Vimentin

WT

Wilms’ Tumor

ZEB1

Zinc Finger E-Box Binding Homeobox 1

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors confirm that this article content has no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Hanahan D., Weinberg R.A. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell. 2000;100:57–70. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81683-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hanahan D., Weinberg R.A. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Floor S.L., Dumont J.E., Maenhaut C., Raspe E. Hallmarks of cancer: of all cancer cells, all the time? Trends Mol. Med. 2012;18:509–515. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2012.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Plass C., Pfister S.M., Lindroth A.M., Bogatyrova O., Claus R., Lichter P. Mutations in regulators of the epigenome and their connections to global chromatin patterns in cancer. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2013;14(11):765–780. doi: 10.1038/nrg3554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lichtenstein A.V. Cancer: evolutionary, genetic and epigenetic aspects. Clin. Epigenetics. 2010;1:85–100. doi: 10.1007/s13148-010-0010-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hanahan D., Coussens L.M. Accessories to the crime: functions of cells recruited to the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Cell. 2012;21:309–322. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.02.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cazaux C. Genetic instability as a driver for oncogenesis. Bull. Cancer. 2010;97:1241–1251. doi: 10.1684/bdc.2010.1202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Putiri E.L., Robertson K.D. Epigenetic mechanisms and genome stability. Clin. Epigenetics. 2010;2:299–314. doi: 10.1007/s13148-010-0017-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shah M.A., Denton E.L., Arrowsmith C.H., Lupien M., Schapira M. A global assessment of cancer genomic alterations in epigenetic mechanisms. Epigen. Chrom. 2014;7(1):29. doi: 10.1186/1756-8935-7-29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.You J.S., Jones P.A. Cancer genetics and epigenetics: two sides of the same coin? Cancer Cell. 2012;22(1):9–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.06.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kelly T.K., De Carvalho D.D., Jones P.A. Epigenetic modifications as therapeutic targets. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010;28:1069–1078. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Baylin S.B., Jones P.A. A decade of exploring the cancer epigenome – biological and translational implications. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2011;11(10):726–734. doi: 10.1038/nrc3130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tsai H.C., Baylin S.B. Cancer epigenetics: linking basic biology to clinical medicine. Cell Res. 2011;21(3):502–517. doi: 10.1038/cr.2011.24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jones P.A., Baylin S.B. The epigenomics of cancer. Cell. 2007;128(4):683–692. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Baylin S., Bestor T.H. Altered methylation patterns in cancer cell genomes: cause or consequence? Cancer Cell. 2002;1(4):299–305. doi: 10.1016/s1535-6108(02)00061-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Baylin S.B., Herman J.G. DNA hypermethylation in tumorigenesis: epigenetics joins genetics. Trends Genet. 2000;16(4):168–174. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(99)01971-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Simó-Riudalbas L., Esteller M. Targeting the histone orthography of cancer: drugs for writers, erasers and readers. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2015;172(11):2716–2732. doi: 10.1111/bph.12844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Guil S., Esteller M. RNA-RNA interactions in gene regulation: the coding and noncoding players. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2015;40(5):248–256. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2015.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Melo S.A., Esteller M. Disruption of microRNA nuclear transport in human cancer. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2014;27:46–51. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2014.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Simó-Riudalbas L., Esteller M. Cancer genomics identifies disrupted epigenetic genes. Hum. Genet. 2014;133(6):713–725. doi: 10.1007/s00439-013-1373-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sandoval J., Esteller M. Cancer epigenomics: beyond genomics. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2012;22(1):50–55. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2012.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lopez-Serra P., Esteller M. DNA methylation-associated silencing of tumor-suppressor microRNAs in cancer. Oncogene. 2012;31(13):1609–1622. doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rodríguez-Paredes M., Esteller M. Cancer epigenetics reaches mainstream oncology. Nat. Med. 2011;17(3):330–339. doi: 10.1038/nm.2305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Melo S.A., Esteller M. Dysregulation of microRNAs in cancer: playing with fire. FEBS Lett. 2011;585(13):2087–2099. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Davalos V., Esteller M. MicroRNAs and cancer epigenetics: a macrorevolution. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 2010;22(1):35–45. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0b013e328333dcbb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lujambio A., Esteller M. How epigenetics can explain human metastasis: a new role for microRNAs? Cell Cycle. 2009;8(3):377–382. doi: 10.4161/cc.8.3.7526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Esteller M. Epigenetic gene silencing in cancer: the DNA hypermethylome. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2007;16(Spec No 1):R50–R59. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddm018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lujambio A., Esteller M. CpG island hypermethylation of tumor suppressor microRNAs in human cancer. Cell Cycle. 2007;6(12):1455–1459. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ropero S., Esteller M. The role of histone deacetylases (HDACs) in human cancer. Mol. Oncol. 2007;1(1):19–25. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2007.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Esteller M. Cancer epigenomics: DNA methylomes and histone-modification maps. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007;8(4):286–298. doi: 10.1038/nrg2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Espada J., Esteller M. Epigenetic control of nuclear architecture. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2007;64(4):449–457. doi: 10.1007/s00018-007-6358-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Fraga M.F., Esteller M. Towards the human cancer epigenome: a first draft of histone modifications. Cell Cycle. 2005;4(10):1377–1381. doi: 10.4161/cc.4.10.2113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ballestar E., Esteller M. Methyl-CpG-binding proteins in cancer: blaming the DNA methylation messenger. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2005;83(3):374–384. doi: 10.1139/o05-035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cho H.S., Park J.H., Kim Y.J. Epigenomics: Novel aspect of genomic regulation. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2007;40(2):151–155. doi: 10.5483/bmbrep.2007.40.2.151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.De Carvalho D.D., You J.S., Jones P.A. DNA methylation and cellular reprogramming. Trends Cell Biol. 2010;20(10):609–617. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2010.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.De Carvalho D.D., Sharma S., You J.S., Su S.F., Taberlay P.C., Kelly T.K., Yang X., Liang G., Jones P.A. DNA methylation screening identifies driver epigenetic events of cancer cell survival. Cancer Cell. 2012;21(5):655–667. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.03.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Goldberg A.D., Allis C.D., Bernstein E. Epigenetics: a landscape takes shape. Cell. 2007;128(4):635–638. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Garzon R., Calin G.A., Croce C.M. MicroRNAs in Cancer. Annu. Rev. Med. 2009;60:167–179. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.59.053006.104707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Jones P.A. DNA methylation and cancer. Oncogene. 2002;21(35):5358–5360. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Core L.J., Waterfall J.J., Gilchrist D.A., Fargo D.C., Kwak H., Adelman K., Lis J.T. Defining the status of RNA polymerase at promoters. Cell Reports. 2012;2(4):1025–1035. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.08.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Adelman K., Lis J.T. Promoter-proximal pausing of RNA polymerase II: emerging roles in metazoans. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012;13(10):720–731. doi: 10.1038/nrg3293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Tischler J., Surani M.A. Investigating transcriptional states at single-cell-resolution. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2013;24(1):69–78. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2012.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Napoli C., Sessa M., Infante T., Casamassimi A. Unraveling framework of the ancestral Mediator complex in human diseases. Biochimie. 2012;94(3):579–587. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2011.09.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Larivière L., Plaschka C., Seizl M., Wenzeck L., Kurth F., Cramer P. Structure of the Mediator head module. Nature. 2012;492(7429):448–451. doi: 10.1038/nature11670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lee T.I., Young R.A. Transcriptional Regulation and Its Misregulation in Disease. Cell. 2013;152:1237–1251. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Boyd K.E., Farnham P.J. Identification of target genes of oncogenic transcription factors. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1999;222(1):9–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1373.1999.09992.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Roose J., Clevers H. TCF transcription factors: molecular switches in carcinogenesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1999;1424(2-3):M23–M37. doi: 10.1016/s0304-419x(99)00026-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Grandori C., Cowley S.M., James L.P., Eisenman R.N. The Myc/Max/Mad network and the transcriptional control of cell behavior. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2000;16:653–699. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.16.1.653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Jang M.S., Zlobin A., Kast W.M., Miele L. Notch signaling as a target in multimodality cancer therapy. Curr. Opin. Mol. Ther. 2000;2(1):55–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Müller H., Helin K. The E2F transcription factors: key regulators of cell proliferation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2000;1470(1):M1–M12. doi: 10.1016/s0304-419x(99)00030-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Miyazono K. TGF-beta/SMAD signaling and its involvement in tumor progression. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2000;23(10):1125–1130. doi: 10.1248/bpb.23.1125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Shaulian E., Karin M. AP-1 in cell proliferation and survival. Oncogene. 2001;20(19):2390–2400. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Vogt P.K. Jun, the oncoprotein. Oncogene. 2001;20(19):2365–2377. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Darnell J.E., Jr Transcription factors as targets for cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2002;2(10):740–749. doi: 10.1038/nrc906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Levy D.E., Darnell J.E., Jr Stats: transcriptional control and biological impact. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002;3(9):651–662. doi: 10.1038/nrm909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.van Noort M., Meeldijk J., van der Zee R., Destree O., Clevers H. Wnt signaling controls the phosphorylation status of beta-catenin. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277(20):17901–17905. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111635200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.van Noort M., Clevers H. TCF transcription factors, mediators of Wnt-signaling in development and cancer. Dev. Biol. 2002;244(1):1–8. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2001.0566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Levenson A.S., Kumar A., Zhang X. MTA family of proteins in prostate cancer: biology, significance, and therapeutic opportunities. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2014;33(4):929–942. doi: 10.1007/s10555-014-9519-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Blagosklonny M.V. p53 from complexity to simplicity: mutant p53 stabilization, gain-of-function, and dominant-negative effect. FASEB J. 2000;14(13):1901–1907. doi: 10.1096/fj.99-1078rev. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Pandolfi P.P. Transcription therapy for cancer. Oncogene. 2001;20(24):3116–3127. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Semenza G.L. HIF-1 and human disease: one highly involved factor. Genes Dev. 2000;14(16):1983–1991. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Candi E., Agostini M., Melino G., Bernassola F. How the TP53 family proteins TP63 and TP73 contribute to tumorigenesis: regulators and effectors. Hum. Mutat. 2014;35(6):702–714. doi: 10.1002/humu.22523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Tong X., Li L., Li X., Heng L., Zhong L., Su X., Rong R., Hu S., Liu W., Jia B., Liu X., Kou G., Han J., Guo S., Hu Y., Li C., Tao Q., Guo Y. SOX10, a novel HMG-box-containing tumor suppressor, inhibits growth and metastasis of digestive cancers by suppressing the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Oncotarget. 2014;5(21):10571–10583. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Hong B., van den Heuvel A.P., Prabhu V.V., Zhang S., El-Deiry W.S. Targeting tumor suppressor p53 for cancer therapy: strategies, challenges and opportunities. Curr. Drug Targets. 2014;15(1):80–89. doi: 10.2174/1389450114666140106101412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Hong K.J., Wu D.C., Cheng K.H., Chen L.T., Hung W.C. RECK inhibits stemness gene expression and tumorigenicity of gastric cancer cells by suppressing ADAM-mediated Notch1 activation. J. Cell. Physiol. 2014;229(2):191–201. doi: 10.1002/jcp.24434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Yumimoto K., Akiyoshi S., Ueo H., Sagara Y., Onoyama I., Ueo H., Ohno S., Mori M., Mimori K., Nakayama K.I. F-box protein FBXW7 inhibits cancer metastasis in a non-cell-autonomous manner. J. Clin. Invest. 2015;125(2):621–635. doi: 10.1172/JCI78782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Guo X., Xia J., Yan J. Promoter methylated microRNAs: potential therapeutic targets in gastric cancer. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015;11(2):759–765. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2014.2780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Liu X., Chen X., Yu X., Tao Y., Bode A.M., Dong Z., Cao Y. Regulation of microRNAs by epigenetics and their interplay involved in cancer. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013;32:96. doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-32-96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Maia B.M., Rocha R.M., Calin G.A. Clinical significance of the interaction between non-coding RNAs and the epigenetics machinery: challenges and opportunities in oncology. Epigenetics. 2014;9(1):75–80. doi: 10.4161/epi.26488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Gomes A.Q., Nolasco S., Soares H. Non-coding RNAs: multi-tasking molecules in the cell. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013;14(8):16010–16039. doi: 10.3390/ijms140816010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Krell J., Frampton A.E., Colombo T., Gall T.M., De Giorgio A., Harding V., Stebbing J., Castellano L. The p53 miRNA interactome and its potential role in the cancer clinic. Epigenomics. 2013;5(4):417–428. doi: 10.2217/epi.13.41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Profumo V., Gandellini P. MicroRNAs: cobblestones on the road to cancer metastasis. Crit. Rev. Oncog. 2013;18(4):341–355. doi: 10.1615/critrevoncog.2013007182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Baer C., Claus R., Plass C. Genome-wide epigenetic regulation of miRNAs in cancer. Cancer Res. 2013;73(2):473–477. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-3731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Wang Z., Yao H., Lin S., Zhu X., Shen Z., Lu G., Poon W.S., Xie D., Lin M.C., Kung H.F. Transcriptional and epigenetic regulation of human microRNAs. Cancer Lett. 2013;331(1):1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2012.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Jansson M.D., Lund A.H. MicroRNA and cancer. Mol. Oncol. 2012;6(6):590–610. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2012.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Fabbri M., Calore F., Paone A., Galli R., Calin G.A. Epigenetic regulation of miRNAs in cancer. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2013;754:137–148. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-9967-2_6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Khan D.H., Jahan S., Davie J.R. Pre-mRNA splicing: role of epigenetics and implications in disease. Adv. Biol. Regul. 2012;52(3):377–388. doi: 10.1016/j.jbior.2012.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Liep J., Rabien A., Jung K. Feedback networks between microRNAs and epigenetic modifications in urological tumors. Epigenetics. 2012;7(4):315–325. doi: 10.4161/epi.19464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Perera R.J., Ray A. Epigenetic regulation of miRNA genes and their role in human melanomas. Epigenomics. 2012;4(1):81–90. doi: 10.2217/epi.11.114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Macaluso M., Paggi M.G., Giordano A. Genetic and epigenetic alterations as hallmarks of the intricate road to cancer. Oncogene. 2003;22(42):6472–6478. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Sharma S., Kelly T.K., Jones P.A. Epigenetics in cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2010;31(1):27–36. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgp220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Issa J.P., Kantarjian H.M. Targeting DNA methylation. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009;15(12):3938–3946. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Hardy T.M., Tollefsbol T.O. Epigenetic diet: impact on the epigenome and cancer. Epigenomics. 2011;3(4):503–518. doi: 10.2217/epi.11.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Stefanska B., Karlic H., Varga F., Fabianowska-Majewska K., Haslberger A. Epigenetic mechanisms in anti-cancer actions of bioactive food components - the implications in cancer prevention. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2012;167(2):279–297. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.02002.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Narayanan K.B., Ali M., Barclay B.J., Cheng Q., D'Abronzo L., Dornetshuber-Fleiss R., Ghosh P.M., Gonzalez Guzman M.J., Lee T.J., Leung P.S., Li L., Luanpitpong S., Ratovitski E.A., Rojanasakul Y., Romano M.F., Romano S., Sinha R.K., Yedjou C., Al-Mulla F., Al-Temaimi R., Amedei A., Brown D.G., Ryan E.P., Colacci A., Hamid R.A., Mondello C., Raju J., Salem H.K., Woodrick J., Scovassi I., Singh N., Vaccari M., Roy R., Forte S., Memeo L., Kim S.Y., Bisson W.H., Lowe L., Park H.H. Disruptive environmental chemicals and cellular mechanisms that confer resistance to cell death. Carcinogenesis. 2015;36(6) Suppl. 1:S89–S110. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgv032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Goodson W.H., III, Lowe L., Carpenter D.O., Gilbertson M., Manaf Ali A., Lopez de Cerain Salsamendi A., Lasfar A., Carnero A., Azqueta A., Amedei A., Charles A.K., Collins A.R., Ward A., Salzberg A.C., Colacci A., Olsen A.K., Berg A., Barclay B.J., Zhou B.P., Blanco-Aparicio C., Baglole C.J., Dong C., Mondello C., Hsu C.W., Naus C.C., Yedjou C., Curran C.S., Laird D.W., Koch D.C., Carlin D.J., Felsher D.W., Roy D., Brown D.G., Ratovitski E.A., Ryan E.P., Corsini E., Rojas E., Moon E.Y. Laconi. E.; Marongiu, F.; Al-Mulla, F.; Chiaradonna, F.; Darroudi, F.; Martin, F.L.; Van Schooten, F.J.; Goldberg, G.S.; Wagemaker, G.; Nangami, G.; Calaf, G.M.; Williams, G.; Wolf, G.T.; Koppen, G.; Brunborg, G.; Kim Lyerly, H.; Krishnan, H.; Ab Hamid, H.; Yasaei, H.; Sone, H.; Kondoh, H.; Salem, H.K.; Hsu, H.Y.; Park, H.H.; Koturbash, I.; Miousse, I.R.; Scovassi, A.I.; Klaunig, J.E.; Vondráček, J.; Raju, J.; Roman, J.; Wise, J.P. Sr; Whitfield, J.R.; Woodrick, J.; Christopher, J.A.; Ochieng, J.; Martinez-Leal, J.F.; Weisz, J.; Kravchenko, J.; Sun, J.; Prudhomme, K.R.; Narayanan, K.B.; Cohen-Solal, K.A.; Moorwood, K.; Gonzalez, L.; Soucek, L.; Jian, L.; D'Abronzo, L.S.; Lin, L.T.; Li, L.; Gulliver, L.; McCawley, L.J.; Memeo, L.; Vermeulen, L.; Leyns, L.; Zhang, L.; Valverde, M.; Khatami, M.; Romano, M.F.; Chapellier, M.; Williams, M.A.; Wade, M.; Manjili, M.H.; Lleonart, M.; Xia, M.; Gonzalez, M.J.; Karamouzis, M.V.; Kirsch-Volders, M.; Vaccari, M.; Kuemmerle, N.B.; Singh, N.; Cruickshanks, N.; Kleinstreuer, N.; van Larebeke, N.; Ahmed, N.; Ogunkua, O.; Krishnakumar, P.K.; Vadgama, P.; Marignani, P.A.; Ghosh, P.M.; Ostrosky-Wegman, P.; Thompson, P.; Dent, P.; Heneberg, P.; Darbre, P.; Sing Leung, P.; Nangia-Makker, P.; Cheng, Q.S.; Robey, R.B.; Al-Temaimi, R.; Roy, R.; Andrade-Vieira, R.; Sinha, R.K.; Mehta, R.; Vento, R.; Di Fiore, R.; Ponce-Cusi, R.; Dornetshuber-Fleiss, R.; Nahta, R.; Castellino, R.C.; Palorini, R.; Abd Hamid, R.; Langie, S.A.; Eltom, S.; Brooks, S.A.; Ryeom, S.; Wise, S.S.; Bay, S.N.; Harris, S.A.; Papagerakis, S.; Romano, S.; Pavanello, S.; Eriksson, S.; Forte, S.; Casey, S.C.; Luanpitpong, S.; Lee, T.J.; Otsuki, T.; Chen, T.; Massfelder, T.; Sanderson, T.; Guarnieri, T.; Hultman, T.; Dormoy, V.; Odero-Marah, V.; Sabbisetti, V.; Maguer-Satta, V.; Rathmell, W.K.; Engström, W.; Decker, W.K.; Bisson, W.H.; Rojanasakul, Y.; Luqmani, Y.; Chen, Z.; Hu, Z. Assessing the carcinogenic potential of low-dose exposures to chemical mixtures in the environment: the challenge ahead. Carcinogenesis. 2015;36(6) Suppl. 1:S254–S296. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgv039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Gerhauser C. Cancer chemoprevention and nutriepigenetics: state of the art and future challenges. Top. Curr. Chem. 2013;32:73–132. doi: 10.1007/128_2012_360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Rajendran P., Ho E., Williams D.E., Dashwood R.H. Dietary phytochemicals, HDAC inhibition, and DNA damage/repair defects in cancer cells. Clin. Epigenetics. 2011;3(1):4. doi: 10.1186/1868-7083-3-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Lim U., Song M.A. Dietary and lifestyle factors of DNA methylation. Methods Mol. Biol. 2012;863:359–376. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-612-8_23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Phuah N.H., Nagoor N.H. Regulation of microRNAs by natural agents: new strategies in cancer therapies. 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 91.Kong A.N., Zhang C., Su Z.Y. Targeting epigenetics for cancer prevention by dietary cancer preventive compounds - the case of miRNA. Cancer Prev. Res. (Phila.) 2013;6(7):622–624. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Wang Y., Li Y., Liu X., Cho W.C. Genetic and epigenetic studies for determining molecular targets of natural compound anticancer agents. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets. 2013;13(5):506–518. doi: 10.2174/15680096113139990033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Cherblanc F.L., Davidson R.W., Di Fruscia P., Srimongkolpithak N., Fuchter M.J. Perspectives on natural compound epigenetic modulators in chemical biology and medicine. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2013;30(5):605–624. doi: 10.1039/c3np20097c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Shankar S., Kumar D., Srivastava R.K. Epigenetic modifications by dietary phytochemicals: implications for personalized nutrition. Pharmacol. Ther. 2013;138(1):1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Khan S.I., Aumsuwan P., Khan I.A., Walker L.A., Dasmahapatra A.K. Epigenetic events associated with breast cancer and their prevention by dietary components targeting the epigenome. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2012;25(1):61–73. doi: 10.1021/tx200378c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Kok T.M., Breda S.G., Briedé J.J. Genomics-based identification of molecular mechanisms behind the cancer preventive action of phytochemicals: potential and challenges. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2012;13(1):255–264. doi: 10.2174/138920112798868601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Huang J., Plass C., Gerhauser C. Cancer chemoprevention by targeting the epigenome. Curr. Drug Targets. 2011;12(13):1925–1956. doi: 10.2174/138945011798184155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Dolinoy D.C., Jirtle R.L. Environmental epigenomics in human health and disease. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2008;49(1):4–8. doi: 10.1002/em.20366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Dolinoy D.C. Epigenetic gene regulation: early environmental exposures. Pharmacogenomics. 2007;8(1):5–10. doi: 10.2217/14622416.8.1.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Li Y., Tollefsbol T.O. Impact on DNA methylation in cancer prevention and therapy by bioactive dietary components. Curr. Med. Chem. 2010;17:2141–2151. doi: 10.2174/092986710791299966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Lee E.Y., Muller W.J. Oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2010;2(10):a003236. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a003236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Kikuno N., Shiina H., Urakami S., Kawamoto K., Hirata H., Tanaka Y., Majid S., Igawa M., Dahiya R. Genistein mediated histone acetylation and demethylation activates tumor suppressor genes in prostate cancer cells. Int. J. Cancer. 2008;123:552–560. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Lee J.S. Functional link between DNA damage responses and transcriptional regulation by ATM in response to a histone deacetylase inhibitor TSA. Cancer Res. Treat. 2007;39:116–124. doi: 10.4143/crt.2007.39.3.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Li B., Zhao J., Wang C.Z., Searle J., He T.C., Yuan C.S., Du W. Ginsenoside Rh2 induces apoptosis and paraptosis-like cell death in colorectal cancer cells through activation of p53. Cancer Lett. 2011;301(2):185–192. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2010.11.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Andreoli V., Gehrau R.C., Bocco J.L. Biology of Krüppel-like factor 6 transcriptional regulator in cell life and death. IUBMB Life. 2010;62(12):896–905. doi: 10.1002/iub.396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Chen C.C., Chen H.L., Hsieh C.W., Yang Y.L., Wung B.S. Upregulation of NF-E2-related factor-2-dependent glutathione by carnosol provokes a cytoprotective response and enhances cell survival. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2011;32(1):62–69. doi: 10.1038/aps.2010.181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Tuntiwechapikul W., Taka T., Songsomboon C., Kaewtunjai N., Imsumran A., Makonkawkeyoon L., Pompimon W., Lee T.R. Ginger extract inhibits human telomerase reverse transcriptase and c-Myc expression in A549 lung cancer cells. J. Med. Food. 2010;13(6):1347–1354. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2010.1191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Fujiwara Y., Komohara Y., Ikeda T., Takeya M. Corosolic acid inhibits glioblastoma cell proliferation by suppressing the activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 and nuclear factor-kappa B in tumor cells and tumor-associated macrophages. Cancer Sci. 2011;102(1):206–211. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01772.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Teiten M.H., Eifes S., Dicato M., Diederich M. Curcumin - the paradigm of a multi-target natural compound with applications in cancer prevention and treatment. Toxins (Basel) 2010;2(1):128–162. doi: 10.3390/toxins2010128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Teiten M.H., Gaascht F., Eifes S., Dicato M., Diederich M. Chemopreventive potential of curcumin in prostate cancer. Genes Nutr. 2010;5(1):61–74. doi: 10.1007/s12263-009-0152-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Huang M.T., Newmark H.L., Frenkel K. Inhibitory effects of curcumin on tumorigenesis in mice. J. Cell. Biochem. Suppl. 1997;27:26–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Zang S., Liu T., Shi J., Qiao L. Curcumin: a promising agent targeting cancer stem cells. Anticancer. Agents Med. Chem. 2014;14(6):787–792. doi: 10.2174/1871520614666140521114735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Marquardt J.U., Gomez-Quiroz L., Arreguin Camacho L.O., Pinna F., Lee Y.H., Kitade M., Domínguez M.P., Castven D., Breuhahn K., Conner E.A., Galle P.R., Andersen J.B., Factor V.M., Thorgeirsson S.S. Curcumin effectively inhibits oncogenic NF-κB signaling and restrains stemness features in liver cancer. J. Hepatol. 2015 doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.04.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Chen Y., Shu W., Chen W., Wu Q., Liu H., Cui G. Curcumin, both histone deacetylase and p300/CBP-specific inhibitor, represses the activity of nuclear factor kappa B and Notch 1 in Raji cells. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2007;101(6):427–433. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2007.00142.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Lin J.K. Molecular targets of curcumin. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2007;595:227–243. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-46401-5_10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Park C.H., Lee J.H., Yang C.H. Curcumin derivatives inhibit the formation of Jun-Fos-DNA complex independently of their conserved cysteine residues. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2005;38(4):474–480. doi: 10.5483/bmbrep.2005.38.4.474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Prusty B.K., Das B.C. Constitutive activation of transcription factor AP-1 in cervical cancer and suppression of human papillomavirus (HPV) transcription and AP-1 activity in HeLa cells by curcumin. Int. J. Cancer. 2005;113(6):951–960. doi: 10.1002/ijc.20668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Mukhopadhyay A., Bueso-Ramos C., Chatterjee D., Pantazis P., Aggarwal B.B. Curcumin downregulates cell survival mechanisms in human prostate cancer cell lines. Oncogene. 2001;20(52):7597–7609. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Wang J., Xie H., Gao F., Zhao T., Yang H., Kang B. Curcumin induces apoptosis in p53-null Hep3B cells through a TAp73/DNp73-dependent pathway. Tumour Biol. 2015 doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-4029-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Siddiqui I.A., Adhami V.M., Saleem M., Mukhtar H. Beneficial effects of tea and its polyphenols against prostate cancer. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2006;50(2):130–143. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.200500113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Murugan R.S., Vinothini G., Hara Y., Nagini S. Black tea polyphenols target matrix metalloproteinases, RECK, proangiogenic molecules and histone deacetylase in a rat hepatocarcinogenesis model. Anticancer Res. 2009;29(6):2301–2305. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Cordero-Herrera I., Martín M.A., Bravo L., Goya L., Ramos S. Epicatechin gallate induces cell death via p53 activation and stimulation of p38 and JNK in human colon cancer SW480 cells. Nutr. Cancer. 2013;65(5):718–728. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2013.795981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Liu J.D., Chen S.H., Lin C.L., Tsai S.H., Liang Y.C. Inhibition of melanoma growth and metastasis by combination with (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate and dacarbazine in mice. J. Cell. Biochem. 2001;83(4):631–642. doi: 10.1002/jcb.1261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Feitelson M.A., Arzumanyan A., Kulathinal R.J., Blain S.W., Holcombe R.F., Mahajna J., Marino M., Martinez-Chantar M.L., Nawroth R., Sanchez-Garcia I., Sharma D., Saxena N.K., Singh N., Vlachostergios P.J., Guo S., Honoki K., Fujii H., Georgakilas A.G., Bilsland A., Amedei A., Niccolai E., Amin A., Ashraf S.S., Boosani C.S., Guha G., Ciriolo M.R., Aquilano K., Chen S., Mohammed S.I., Azmi A.S., Bhakta D., Halicka D., Keith W.N., Nowsheen S. Sustained proliferation in cancer: Mechanisms and novel therapeutic targets. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2015 doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2015.02.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.AlQathama A., Prieto J.M. Natural compounds with therapeutic potential in melanoma metastasis. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2015;32(8):1170–1182. doi: 10.1039/c4np00130c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Pradhan S.J., Mishra R., Sharma P., Kundu G.C. Quercetin and sulforaphane in combination suppress the progression of melanoma through the down-regulation of matrix metalloproteinase-9. Exp. Ther. Med. 2010;1(6):915–920. doi: 10.3892/etm.2010.144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Chung S.S., Vadgama J.V. Curcumin and epigallocatechin gallate inhibit the cancer stem cell phenotype via down-regulation of STAT3-NFκB signaling. Anticancer Res. 2015;35(1):39–46. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Xu Y., Zhu F., Xu S., Liu L. Anti-tumor effect of the extract from Qingyi-huaji formula on pancreatic cancer by down-regulating Notch-4 and Jagged-1. J. Tradit. Chin. Med. 2015;35(1):77–83. doi: 10.1016/s0254-6272(15)30012-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Chu L., Zhao H., Fang J., Li C., Liu Z., Cui R., Hu F., Zhang X., Chen Y., Han H., Cao C., Xu Q. The traditional Chinese medicinal formula BDL301 suppresses tumor growth by inhibiting STAT3 pathway and inducing apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells. DNA Cell Biol. 2015;34(3):178–188. doi: 10.1089/dna.2014.2532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Dai X., Ahn K.S., Kim C., Siveen K.S., Ong T.H., Shanmugam M.K., Li F., Shi J., Kumar A.P., Wang L.Z., Goh B.C., Magae J., Hui K.M., Sethi G. Ascochlorin, an isoprenoid antibiotic inhibits growth and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting STAT3 signaling cascade through the induction of PIAS3. Mol. Oncol. 2015;9(4):818–833. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2014.12.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Chun J., Li R.J., Cheng M.S., Kim Y.S. Alantolactone selectively suppresses STAT3 activation and exhibits potent anticancer activity in MDA-MB-231 cells. Cancer Lett. 2015;357(1):393–403. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.11.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Khan M., Li T., Ahmad Khan M.K., Rasul A., Nawaz F., Sun M., Zheng Y., Ma T. Alantolactone induces apoptosis in HepG2 cells through GSH depletion, inhibition of STAT3 activation, and mitochondrial dysfunction. 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 133.Chen X.Z., Cao Z.Y., Li J.N., Hu H.X., Zhang Y.Q., Huang Y.M., Liu Z.Z., Hu D., Liao L.M., Du J. Ethyl acetate extract from Jiedu Xiaozheng Yin inhibits the proliferation of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells by suppressing polycomb gene compound Bmi1 and Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Oncol. Rep. 2014;32(6):2710–2718. doi: 10.3892/or.2014.3541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Cao Z., Lin W., Huang Z., Chen X., Zhao J., Zheng L., Ye H., Liu Z., Liao L., Du J. Ethyl acetate extraction from a Chinese herbal formula, Jiedu Xiaozheng Yin, inhibits the proliferation of hepatocellular carcinoma cells via induction of G0/G1 phase arrest in vivo and in vitro. Int. J. Oncol. 2013;42(1):202–210. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2012.1703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Tollefsbol T.O. Dietary epigenetics in cancer and aging. Cancer Treat. Res. 2014;159:257–267. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-38007-5_15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Wu T.Y., Khor T.O., Lee J.H., Cheung K.L., Shu L., Chen C., Kong A.N. Pharmacogenetics, pharmacogenomics and epigenetics of Nrf2-regulated xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes and transporters by dietary phytochemical and cancer chemoprevention. Curr. Drug Metab. 2013;14(6):688–694. doi: 10.2174/1389200211314060005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Lee H. J.; Shu, L.; Fuentes, F.; Su, Z.Y.; Tony Kong, A.N. Cancer chemoprevention by traditional chinese herbal medicine and dietary phytochemicals: targeting nrf2-mediated oxidative stress/anti-inflammatory responses, epigenetics, and cancer stem cells. J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 2013;3(1):69–79. doi: 10.4103/2225-4110.107700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Lee J.H., Khor T.O., Shu L., Su Z.Y., Fuentes F., Kong A.N. Dietary phytochemicals and cancer prevention: Nrf2 signaling, epigenetics, and cell death mechanisms in blocking cancer initiation and progression. Pharmacol. Ther. 2013;137(2):153–171. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.09.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Su Z.Y., Shu L., Khor T.O., Lee J.H., Fuentes F., Kong A.N. A perspective on dietary phytochemicals and cancer chemoprevention: oxidative stress, nrf2, and epigenomics. Top. Curr. Chem. 2013;329:133–162. doi: 10.1007/128_2012_340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Cheung K.L., Kong A.N. Molecular targets of dietary phenethyl isothiocyanate and sulforaphane for cancer chemoprevention. AAPS J. 2010;12(1):87–97. doi: 10.1208/s12248-009-9162-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Stepanic V., Gasparovic A.C., Troselj K.G., Amic D., Zarkovic N. Selected attributes of polyphenols in targeting oxidative stress in cancer. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2015;15(5):496–509. doi: 10.2174/1568026615666150209123100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Na H.K., Surh Y.J. Oncogenic potential of Nrf2 and its principal target protein heme oxygenase-1. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2014;67:353–365. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.10.819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Surh Y.J., Na H.K. NF-kappaB and Nrf2 as prime molecular targets for chemoprevention and cytoprotection with anti-inflammatory and antioxidant phytochemicals. Genes Nutr. 2008;2(4):313–317. doi: 10.1007/s12263-007-0063-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Surh Y.J., Kundu J.K., Na H.K. Nrf2 as a master redox switch in turning on the cellular signaling involved in the induction of cytoprotective genes by some chemopreventive phytochemicals. Planta Med. 2008;74(13):1526–1539. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1088302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Na H.K., Kim E.H., Jung J.H., Lee H.H., Hyun J.W., Surh Y.J. (-)-Epigallocatechin gallate induces Nrf2-mediated antioxidant enzyme expression via activation of PI3K and ERK in human mammary epithelial cells. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2008;476(2):171–177. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2008.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Na H.K., Surh Y.J. Modulation of Nrf2-mediated antioxidant and detoxifying enzyme induction by the green tea polyphenol EGCG. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008;46(4):1271–1278. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2007.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Banerjee S., Kong D., Wang Z., Bao B., Hillman G.G., Sarkar F.H. Attenuation of multi-targeted proliferation-linked signaling by 3,3'-diindolylmethane (DIM): from bench to clinic. Mutat. Res. 2011;728(1-2):47–66. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2011.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Rahman K.M., Sarkar F.H., Banerjee S., Wang Z., Liao D.J., Hong X., Sarkar N.H. Therapeutic intervention of experimental breast cancer bone metastasis by indole-3-carbinol in SCID-human mouse model. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2006;5(11):2747–2756. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Chen D., Banerjee S., Cui Q.C., Kong D., Sarkar F.H., Dou Q.P. Activation of AMP-activated protein kinase by 3,3'-Diindolylmethane (DIM) is associated with human prostate cancer cell death in vitro and in vivo. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47186. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Safa M., Tavasoli B., Manafi R., Kiani F., Kashiri M., Ebrahimi S., Kazemi A. Indole-3-carbinol suppresses NF-κB activity and stimulates the p53 pathway in pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells. Tumour Biol. 2015;36(5):3919–3930. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-3035-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Savouret J.F., Quesne M. Resveratrol and cancer: a review. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2002;56(2):84–87. doi: 10.1016/s0753-3322(01)00158-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Mitani T., Harada N., Tanimori S., Nakano Y., Inui H., Yamaji R. Resveratrol inhibits hypoxia-inducible factor-1α-mediated androgen receptor signaling and represses tumor progression in castration-resistant prostate cancer. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. (Tokyo) 2014;60(4):276–282. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Mitani T., Ito Y., Harada N., Nakano Y., Inui H., Ashida H., Yamaji R. Resveratrol reduces the hypoxia-induced resistance to doxorubicin in breast cancer cells. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. (Tokyo) 2014;60(2):122–128. doi: 10.3177/jnsv.60.122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Shankar S., Nall D., Tang S.N., Meeker D., Passarini J., Sharma J., Srivastava R.K. Resveratrol inhibits pancreatic cancer stem cell characteristics in human and KrasG12D transgenic mice by inhibiting pluripotency maintaining factors and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. PLoS One. 2011;6(1):e16530. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Wang Y., Li Y., Liu X., Cho W.C. Genetic and epigenetic studies for determining molecular targets of natural compound anticancer agents. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets. 2013;13(5):506–518. doi: 10.2174/15680096113139990033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Yoon D.S., Choi Y., Jang Y., Lee M., Choi W.J., Kim S.H., Lee J.W. SIRT1 directly regulates SOX2 to maintain self-renewal and multipotency in bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells. 2014;32(12):3219–3231. doi: 10.1002/stem.1811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Ding D.F., Li X.F., Xu H., Wang Z., Liang Q.Q., Li C.G., Wang Y.J. Mechanism of resveratrol on the promotion of induced pluripotent stem cells. J. Integr. Med. 2013;11(6):389–396. doi: 10.3736/jintegrmed2013039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Zhang M., Bian Z.G., Zhang Y., Wang J.H., Kan L., Wang X., Niu H.Y., He P. Cucurbitacin B inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis via STAT3 pathway inhibition in A549 lung cancer cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2014;10(6):2905–2911. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2014.2581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Hajjouli S., Chateauvieux S., Teiten M.H., Orlikova B., Schumacher M., Dicato M., Choo C.Y. \; Diederich, M. Eurycomanone and eurycomanol from Eurycoma longifolia Jack as regulators of signaling pathways involved in proliferation, cell death and inflammation. Molecules. 2014;19(9):14649–14666. doi: 10.3390/molecules190914649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Orlikova B., Schumacher M., Juncker T., Yan C.C., Inayat-Hussain S.H., Hajjouli S., Cerella C., Dicato M., Diederich M. Styryl-lactone goniothalamin inhibits TNF-α-induced NF-κB activation. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013;59:572–578. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2013.06.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Dyshlovoy S.A., Fedorov S.N., Shubina L.K., Kuzmich A.S., Bokemeyer C., Keller-von Amsberg G., Honecker F. Aaptamines from the marine sponge Aaptos sp. display anticancer activities in human cancer cell lines and modulate AP1-, NF-κB-, and p53-dependent transcriptional activity in mouse JB6 Cl41 cells. BioMed Res. Int. 2014;2014:469309. doi: 10.1155/2014/469309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Wang W., Chen B., Zou R., Tu X., Tan S., Lu H., Liu Z., Fu J. Codonolactone, a sesquiterpene lactone isolated from Chloranthus henryi Hemsl, inhibits breast cancer cell invasion, migration and metastasis by downregulating the transcriptional activity of Runx2. Int. J. Oncol. 2014;45(5):1891–1900. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2014.2643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Lou C., Takahashi K., Irimura T., Saiki I., Hayakawa Y. Identification of Hirsutine as an anti-metastatic phytochemical by targeting NF-κB activation. Int. J. Oncol. 2014;45(5):2085–2091. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2014.2624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Dhanani T., Shah S., Kumar S. A validated high-performance liquid chromatography method for determination of tannin-related marker constituents gallic acid, corilagin, chebulagic acid, ellagic acid and chebulinic Acid in four Terminalia species from India. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 2015;53(4):625–632. doi: 10.1093/chromsci/bmu096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Kumar N., Gangappa D., Gupta G., Karnati R. Chebulagic acid from Terminalia chebula causes G1 arrest, inhibits NFκB and induces apoptosis in retinoblastoma cells. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2014;14:319. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Kim S.M., Lee J.H., Sethi G., Kim C., Baek S.H., Nam D., Chung W.S., Kim S.H., Shim B.S., Ahn K.S. Bergamottin, a natural furanocoumarin obtained from grapefruit juice induces chemosensitization and apoptosis through the inhibition of STAT3 signaling pathway in tumor cells. Cancer Lett. 2014;354(1):153–163. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Moghadamtousi S.Z., Kadir H.A., Paydar M., Rouhollahi E., Karimian H. Annona muricata leaves induced apoptosis in A549 cells through mitochondrial-mediated pathway and involvement of NF-κB. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2014;14:299. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Shin M.R., Lee H.J., Kang S.K., Auh Q.S., Lee Y.M., Kim Y.C., Kim E.C. Isocudraxanthone K induces growth inhibition and apoptosis in oral cancer cells via hypoxia inducible factor-1. 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 169.Kao C.L., Cho J., Lee Y.Z., Cheng Y.B., Chien C.Y., Hwang C.F., Hong Y.R., Tseng C.N., Cho C.L. Ethanolic Extracts of Pluchea indica Induce Apoptosis and Antiproliferation Effects in Human Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cells. Molecules. 2015;20(6):11508–11523. doi: 10.3390/molecules200611508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Luo X., Yu X., Liu S., Deng Q., Liu X., Peng S., Li H., Liu J., Cao Y. The role of targeting kinase activity by natural compounds in cancer chemoprevention and chemotherapy. Oncol. Rep. 2015;34(2):547–554. doi: 10.3892/or.2015.4029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Jandial D.D., Blair C.A., Zhang S., Krill L.S., Zhang Y.B., Zi X. Molecular targeted approaches to cancer therapy and prevention using chalcones. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets. 2014;14(2):181–200. doi: 10.2174/1568009614666140122160515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Das R., Bhattacharya K., Samanta S.K., Pal B.C., Mandal C. Improved chemosensitivity in cervical cancer to cisplatin: synergistic activity of mahanine through STAT3 inhibition. Cancer Lett. 2014;351(1):81–90. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Das R., Bhattacharya K., Sarkar S., Samanta S.K., Pal B.C., Mandal C. Mahanine synergistically enhances cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil through ROS-mediated activation of PTEN and p53/p73 in colon carcinoma. Apoptosis. 2014;19(1):149–164. doi: 10.1007/s10495-013-0907-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Bailón-Moscoso N., González-Arévalo G., Velásquez-Rojas G., Malagon O., Vidari G., Zentella-Dehesa A., Ratovitski E.A., Ostrosky-Wegman P. Phytometabolite dehydroleucodine induces cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and DNA damage in human astrocytoma cells through p73/p53 regulation. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0136527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Di C., Sun C., Li H., Si J., Zhang H., Han L., Zhao Q., Liu Y., Liu B., Miao G., Gan L., Liu Y. Diallyl disulfide enhances carbon ion beams-induced apoptotic cell death in cervical cancer cells through regulating TAp73 /ΔNp73. Cell Cycle. 2015 doi: 10.1080/15384101.2015.1104438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Callahan K.P., Minhajuddin M., Corbett C., Lagadinou E.D., Rossi R.M., Grose V., Balys M.M., Pan L., Jacob S., Frontier A., Grever M.R., Lucas D.M., Kinghorn A.D., Liesveld J.L., Becker M.W., Jordan C.T. Flavaglines target primitive leukemia cells and enhance anti-leukemia drug activity. Leukemia. 2014;28(10):1960–1968. doi: 10.1038/leu.2014.93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Becker M.S., Schmezer P., Breuer R., Haas S.F., Essers M.A., Krammer P.H., Li-Weber M. The traditional Chinese medical compound Rocaglamide protects nonmalignant primary cells from DNA damage-induced toxicity by inhibition of p53 expression. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5:e1000. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2013.528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Henrique R., Costa V.L., Cerveira N., Carvalho A.L., Hoque M.O., Ribeiro F.R., Oliveira J., Teixeira M.R., Sidransky D., Jerónimo C. Hypermethylation of Cyclin D2 is associated with loss of mRNA expression and tumor development in prostate cancer. J. Mol. Med. (Berlin) 2006;84(11):911–918. doi: 10.1007/s00109-006-0099-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Tokumaru Y., Yamashita K., Osada M., Nomoto S., Sun D.I., Xiao Y., Hoque M.O., Westra W.H., Califano J.A., Sidransky D. Inverse correlation between cyclin A1 hypermethylation and p53 mutation in head and neck cancer identified by reversal of epigenetic silencing. Cancer Res. 2004;64(17):5982–5987. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Boellmann F., Zhang L., Clewell H.J., Schroth G.P., Kenyon E.M., Andersen M.E., Thomas R.S. Genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation and gene expression changes in the mouse lung following subchronic arsenate exposure. Toxicol. Sci. 2010;117(2):404–417. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfq225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Kong L.M., Liao C.G., Chen L., Yang H.S., Zhang S.H., Zhang Z., Bian H.J., Xing J.L., Chen Z.N. Promoter hypomethylation up-regulates CD147 expression through increasing Sp1 binding and associates with poor prognosis in human hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2011;15(6):1415–1428. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01124.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Carvalho J.R., Filipe L., Costa V.L., Ribeiro F.R., Martins A.T., Teixeira M.R., Jerónimo C., Henrique R. Detailed analysis of expression and promoter methylation status of apoptosis-related genes in prostate cancer. Apoptosis. 2010;15(8):956–965. doi: 10.1007/s10495-010-0508-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Galrão A.L., Camargo R.Y., Friguglietti C.U., Moraes L., Cerutti J.M., Serrano-Nascimento C., Suzuki M.F., Medeiros-Neto G., Rubio I.G. Hypermethylation of a New Distal Sodium/ Iodide Symporter (NIS) enhancer (NDE) is associated with reduced NIS expression in thyroid tumors. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014;99(6):E944–E952. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-1450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Renner M., Wolf T., Meyer H., Hartmann W., Penzel R., Ulrich A., Lehner B., Hovestadt V., Czwan E., Egerer G., Schmitt T., Alldinger I., Renker E.K., Ehemann V., Eils R., Wardelmann E., Büttner R., Lichter P., Brors B., Schirmacher P., Mechtersheimer G. Integrative DNA methylation and gene expression analysis in high-grade soft tissue sarcomas. Genome Biol. 2013;14(12):r137. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-12-r137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Dahl C., Christensen C., Jönsson G., Lorentzen A., Skjødt M.L., Borg Å., Pawelec G., Guldberg P. Mutual exclusivity analysis of genetic and epigenetic drivers in melanoma identifies a link between p14 ARF and RARβ signaling. Mol. Cancer Res. 2013;11(10):1166–1178. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-13-0006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Stefanska B., Huang J., Bhattacharyya B., Suderman M., Hallett M., Han Z.G., Szyf M. Definition of the landscape of promoter DNA hypomethylation in liver cancer. Cancer Res. 2011;71(17):5891–5903. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Delgado M.D., León J. Gene expression regulation and cancer. Clin. Transl. Oncol. 2006;8(11):780–787. doi: 10.1007/s12094-006-0132-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Denis H., Ndlovu M.N., Fuks F. Regulation of mammalian DNA methyltransferases: a route to new mechanisms. EMBO Rep. 2011;12(7):647–656. doi: 10.1038/embor.2011.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Esteller M. Aberrant DNA methylation as a cancer-inducing mechanism. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2005;45:629–656. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.45.120403.095832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Lan J., Hua S., He X., Zhang Y. DNA methyltransferases and methyl-binding proteins of mammals. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. (Shanghai) 2010;42(4):243–252. doi: 10.1093/abbs/gmq015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Sansom O.J., Maddison K., Clarke A.R. Mechanisms of disease: methyl-binding domain proteins as potential therapeutic targets in cancer. Nat. Clin. Pract. Oncol. 2007;4(5):305–315. doi: 10.1038/ncponc0812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Jones P.A., Liang G. Rethinking how DNA methylation patterns are maintained. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009;10:805–811. doi: 10.1038/nrg2651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Wu S.C., Zhang Y. Active DNA demethylation: many roads lead to Rome. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010;11(9):607–620. doi: 10.1038/nrm2950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Guerrero-Preston R., Michailidi C., Marchionni L., Pickering C.R., Frederick M.J., Myers J.N., Yegnasubramanian S., Hadar T., Noordhuis M.G., Zizkova V., Fertig E., Agrawal N., Westra W., Koch W., Califano J., Velculescu V.E., Sidransky D. Key tumor suppressor genes inactivated by “greater promoter” methylation and somatic mutations in head and neck cancer. Epigenetics. 2014;9(7):1031–1046. doi: 10.4161/epi.29025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Comb M., Goodman H.M. CpG methylation inhibits proenkephalin gene expression and binding of the transcription factor AP-2. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990;18(13):3975–3982. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.13.3975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Bonfanti M., Broggini M., Prontera C., D'Incalci M. O6-methylguanine inhibits the binding of transcription factors to DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991;19(20):5739–5742. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.20.5739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.B ednarik, D.P.; Duckett, C.; Kim, S.U.; Perez, V.L.; Griffis, K.; Guenthner, P.C.; Folks, T.M. DNA CpG methylation inhibits binding of NF-kappa B proteins to the HIV-1 long terminal repeat cognate DNA motifs. New Biol. 1991;3(10):969–976. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Boyes J., Bird A. DNA methylation inhibits transcription indirectly via a methyl-CpG binding protein. Cell. 1991;64(6):1123–1134. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90267-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Lamb B.T., Satyamoorthy K., Li L., Solter D., Howe C.C. CpG methylation of an endogenous retroviral enhancer inhibits transcription factor binding and activity. Gene Expr. 1991;1(3):185–196. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Clark S.J., Harrison J., Molloy P.L. Sp1 binding is inhibited by (m)Cp(m)CpG methylation. Gene. 1997;195(1):67–71. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(97)00164-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Thain A., Jenkins O., Clarke A.R., Gaston K. CpG methylation directly inhibits binding of the human papillomavirus type 16 E2 protein to specific DNA sequences. J. Virol. 1996;70(10):7233–7235. doi: 10.1128/jvi.70.10.7233-7235.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Fujita N., Shimotake N., Ohki I., Chiba T., Saya H., Shirakawa M., Nakao M. Mechanism of transcriptional regulation by methyl-CpG binding protein MBD1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000;20(14):5107–5118. doi: 10.1128/mcb.20.14.5107-5118.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Chen B., He L., Savell V.H., Jenkins J.J., Parham D.M. Inhibition of the interferon-gamma/signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) pathway by hypermethylation at a STAT-binding site in the p21WAF1 promoter region. Cancer Res. 2000;60(12):3290–3298. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Campanero M.R., Armstrong M.I., Flemington E.K. CpG methylation as a mechanism for the regulation of E2F activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2000;97(12):6481–6486. doi: 10.1073/pnas.100340697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Kaludov N.K., Wolffe A.P. MeCP2 driven transcriptional repression in vitro: selectivity for methylated DNA, action at a distance and contacts with the basal transcription machinery. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(9):1921–1928. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.9.1921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Mancini D.N., Singh S.M., Archer T.K., Rodenhiser D.I. Site-specific DNA methylation in the neurofibromatosis (NF1) promoter interferes with binding of CREB and SP1 transcription factors. Oncogene. 1999;18(28):4108–4119. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Nakao M., Matsui S., Yamamoto S., Okumura K., Shirakawa M., Fujita N. Regulation of transcription and chromatin by methyl-CpG binding protein MBD1. Brain Dev. 2001;23(Suppl. 1):S174–S176. doi: 10.1016/s0387-7604(01)00348-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Deng G., Chen A., Pong E., Kim Y.S. Methylation in hMLH1 promoter interferes with its binding to transcription factor CBF and inhibits gene expression. Oncogene. 2001;20(48):7120–7127. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Santoro R., Grummt I. Molecular mechanisms mediating methylation-dependent silencing of ribosomal gene transcription. Mol. Cell. 2001;8(3):719–725. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00317-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Nan X., Campoy F.J., Bird A. MeCP2 is a transcriptional repressor with abundant binding sites in genomic chromatin. Cell. 1997;88(4):471–481. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81887-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Eden S., Hashimshony T., Keshet I., Cedar H., Thorne A.W. DNA methylation models histone acetylation. Nature. 1998;394(6696):842. doi: 10.1038/29680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Das P.M., Singal R. DNA methylation and cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2004;22(22):4632–4642. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.07.151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Farooqi A.A., Tang J.Y., Li R.N., Ismail M., Chang Y.T., Shu C.W., Yuan S.S., Liu J.R., Mansoor Q., Huang C.J., Chang H.W. Epigenetic mechanisms in cancer: push and pull between kneaded erasers and fate writers. Int. J. Nanomedicine. 2015;10:3183–3191. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S82527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Jones P.A., Baylin S.B. The fundamental role of epigenetic events in cancer. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2002;3(6):415–428. doi: 10.1038/nrg816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Fuks F., Hurd P.J., Wolf D., Nan X., Bird A.P., Kouzarides T. The methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2 links DNA methylation to histone methylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278(6):4035–4040. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M210256200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Ziller M.J., Gu H., Müller F., Donaghey J., Tsai L.T., Kohlbacher O., De Jager P.L., Rosen E.D., Bennett D.A., Bernstein B.E., Gnirke A., Meissner A. Charting a dynamic DNA methylation landscape of the human genome. Nature. 2013;500(7463):477–481. doi: 10.1038/nature12433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Doerfler W. The significance of DNA methylation patterns: promoter inhibition by sequence-specific methylation is one functional consequence. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1990;326(1235):253–265. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1990.0009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Klose R.J., Bird A.P. Genomic DNA methylation: the mark and its mediators. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2006;31(2):89–97. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2005.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Corn P.G., Kuerbitz S.J., van Noesel M.M., Esteller M., Compitello N., Baylin S.B., Herman J.G. Transcriptional silencing of the p73 gene in acute lymphoblastic leukemia and Burkitt's lymphoma is associated with 5' CpG island methylation. Cancer Res. 1999;59(14):3352–3356. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Esteller M., Corn P.G., Baylin S.B., Herman J.G. A gene hypermethylation profile of human cancer. Cancer Res. 2001;61(8):3225–3229. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Esteller M. CpG island hypermethylation and tumor suppressor genes: a booming present, a brighter future. Oncogene. 2002;21(35):5427–5440. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Ballestar E., Esteller M. The impact of chromatin in human cancer: linking DNA methylation to gene silencing. Carcinogenesis. 2002;23(7):1103–1109. doi: 10.1093/carcin/23.7.1103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Esteller M., Herman J.G. Cancer as an epigenetic disease: DNA methylation and chromatin alterations in human tumours. J. Pathol. 2002;196(1):1–7. doi: 10.1002/path.1024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224.Szyf M., Detich N. Regulation of the DNA methylation machinery and its role in cellular transformation. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 2001;69:47–79. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6603(01)69044-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Reid G.K., Besterman J.M., MacLeod A.R. Selective inhibition of DNA methyltransferase enzymes as a novel strategy for cancer treatment. Curr. Opin. Mol. Ther. 2002;4(2):130–137. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.El-Osta A. DNMT cooperativity--the developing links between methylation, chromatin structure and cancer. BioEssays. 2003;25(11):1071–1084. doi: 10.1002/bies.10345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Patra S.K., Patra A., Rizzi F., Ghosh T.C., Bettuzzi S. Demethylation of (Cytosine-5-C-methyl) DNA and regulation of transcription in the epigenetic pathways of cancer development. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2008;27(2):315–334. doi: 10.1007/s10555-008-9118-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Kanai Y., Hirohashi S. Alterations of DNA methylation associated with abnormalities of DNA methyltransferases in human cancers during transition from a precancerous to a malignant state. Carcinogenesis. 2007;28(12):2434–2442. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgm206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229.Turek-Plewa J., Jagodziński P.P. The role of mammalian DNA methyltransferases in the regulation of gene expression. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 2005;10(4):631–647. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230.Kinney S.R., Pradhan S. Regulation of expression and activity of DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferases in mammalian cells. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2011;101:311–333. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-387685-0.00009-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231.Jin B., Robertson K.D. DNA methyltransferases, DNA damage repair, and cancer. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2013;754:3–29. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-9967-2_1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232.Subramaniam D., Thombre R., Dhar A., Anant S. DNA methyltransferases: a novel target for prevention and therapy. Front. Oncol. 2014;4:80. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2014.00080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233.Uysal F., Akkoyunlu G., Ozturk S. Dynamic expression of DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) in oocytes and early embryos. Biochimie. 2015 doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2015.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234.Vasanthakumar A., Godley L.A. 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in cancer: significance in diagnosis and therapy. Cancer Genet. 2015;208(5):167–177. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2015.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235.Meier K., Brehm A. Chromatin regulation: how complex does it get? Epigenetics. 2014;9(11):1485–1495. doi: 10.4161/15592294.2014.971580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236.Joska T.M., Zaman R., Belden W.J. Regulated DNA methylation and the circadian clock: implications in cancer. Biology (Basel) 2014;3(3):560–577. doi: 10.3390/biology3030560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 237.Feinberg A.P., Tycko B. The history of cancer epigenetics. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2004;4(2):143–153. doi: 10.1038/nrc1279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238.Lo P.K., Sukumar S. Epigenomics and breast cancer. Pharmacogenomics. 2008;9(12):1879–1902. doi: 10.2217/14622416.9.12.1879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 239.Gama-Sosa M.A., Midgett R.M., Slagel V.A., Githens S., Kuo K.C., Gehrke C.W., Ehrlich M. Tissue-specific differences in DNA methylation in various mammals. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1983;740(2):212–219. doi: 10.1016/0167-4781(83)90079-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240.Bedford M.T., van Helden P.D. Hypomethylation of DNA in pathological conditions of the human prostate. Cancer Res. 1987;47(20):5274–5276. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 241.Feinberg A.P., Vogelstein B. Hypomethylation distinguishes genes of some human cancers from their normal counterparts. Nature. 1983;301(5895):89–92. doi: 10.1038/301089a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242.Baylin S.B., Makos M., Wu J.J., Yen R.W., de Bustros A., Vertino P., Nelkin B.D. Abnormal patterns of DNA methylation in human neoplasia: potential consequences for tumor progression. Cancer Cells. 1991;3(10):383–390. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 243.Pinto A., Zagonel V. 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine (Decitabine) and 5-azacytidine in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes: past, present and future trends. Leukemia. 1993;7(Suppl. 1):51–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 244.Christman J.K. 5-Azacytidine and 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine as inhibitors of DNA methylation: mechanistic studies and their implications for cancer therapy. Oncogene. 2002;21(35):5483–5495. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 245.Meehan R.R., Lewis J.D., Bird A.P. Characterization of MeCP2, a vertebrate DNA binding protein with affinity for methylated DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992;20(19):5085–5092. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.19.5085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 246.Lewis J.D., Meehan R.R., Henzel W.J., Maurer-Fogy I., Jeppesen P., Klein F., Bird A. Purification, sequence, and cellular localization of a novel chromosomal protein that binds to methylated DNA. Cell. 1992;69(6):905–914. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90610-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 247.Boyes J., Bird A. Repression of genes by DNA methylation depends on CpG density and promoter strength: evidence for involvement of a methyl-CpG binding protein. EMBO J. 1992;11(1):327–333. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05055.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 248.Hendrich B., Bird A. Identification and characterization of a family of mammalian methyl-CpG binding proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1998;18(11):6538–6547. doi: 10.1128/mcb.18.11.6538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 249.Wade P.A. Methyl CpG-binding proteins and transcriptional repression. BioEssays. 2001;23(12):1131–1137. doi: 10.1002/bies.10008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 250.Berger J., Bird A. Role of MBD2 in gene regulation and tumorigenesis. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2005;33(Pt 6):1537–1540. doi: 10.1042/BST0331537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 251.Parry L., Clarke A.R. The Roles of the Methyl-CpG Binding Proteins in Cancer. Genes Cancer. 2011;2(6):618–630. doi: 10.1177/1947601911418499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 252.Ramchandani S., Bhattacharya S.K., Cervoni N., Szyf M. DNA methylation is a reversible biological signal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1999;96(11):6107–6112. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.11.6107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 253.Bhattacharya S.K., Dubey A.K. Kinetic mechanism of cytosine DNA methyltransferase MspI. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274(21):14743–14749. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.21.14743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 254.Detich N., Theberge J., Szyf M. Promoter-specific activation and demethylation by MBD2/demethylase. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277(39):35791–35794. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C200408200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 255.Ng H.H., Zhang Y., Hendrich B., Johnson C.A., Turner B.M., Erdjument-Bromage H., Tempst P. Reinberg. D.; Bird, A. MBD2 is a transcriptional repressor belonging to the MeCP1 histone deacetylase complex. Nat. Genet. 1999;23(1):58–61. doi: 10.1038/12659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 256.Snape A. MBDs mediate methylation, deacetylation and transcriptional repression. Trends Genet. 2000;16(1):20. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(99)01925-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 257.Ruzov A., Dunican D.S., Prokhortchouk A., Pennings S., Stancheva I., Prokhortchouk E., Meehan R.R. Kaiso is a genome-wide repressor of transcription that is essential for amphibian development. Development. 2004;131(24):6185–6194. doi: 10.1242/dev.01549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 258.Jeffery L., Nakielny S. Components of the DNA methylation system of chromatin control are RNA-binding proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279(47):49479–49487. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M409070200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 259.Lin X., Nelson W.G. Methyl-CpG-binding domain protein-2 mediates transcriptional repression associated with hypermethylated GSTP1 CpG islands in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2003;63(2):498–504. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 260.Hamm S., Just G., Lacoste N., Moitessier N., Szyf M., Mamer O. On the mechanism of demethylation of 5-methylcytosine in DNA. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008;18(3):1046–1049. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.12.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 261.Kriaucionis S., Heintz N. The nuclear DNA base 5-hydroxymethylcytosine is present in Purkinje neurons and the brain. Science. 2009;324(5929):929–930. doi: 10.1126/science.1169786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 262.Ndlovu M.N., Denis H., Fuks F. Exposing the DNA methylome iceberg. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2011;36(7):381–387. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2011.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 263.Pudenz M., Roth K., Gerhauser C. Impact of soy isoflavones on the epigenome in cancer prevention. Nutrients. 2014;6(10):4218–4272. doi: 10.3390/nu6104218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 264.Shukla S., Meeran S.M., Katiyar S.K. Epigenetic regulation by selected dietary phytochemicals in cancer chemoprevention. Cancer Lett. 2014;355(1):9–17. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.09.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 265.Busch C., Burkard M., Leischner C., Lauer U.M., Frank J., Venturelli S. Epigenetic activities of flavonoids in the prevention and treatment of cancer. Clin. Epigenetics. 2015;7(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13148-015-0095-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 266.Mukherjee N., Kumar A.P., Ghosh R. DNA Methylation and Flavonoids in Genitourinary Cancers. Curr. Pharmacol. Rep. 2015;1(2):112–120. doi: 10.1007/s40495-014-0004-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 267.Lee W.J., Shim J.Y., Zhu B.T. Mechanisms for the inhibition of DNA methyltransferases by tea catechins and bioflavonoids. Mol. Pharmacol. 2005;68(4):1018–1030. doi: 10.1124/mol.104.008367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 268.Gilbert E.R., Liu D. Flavonoids influence epigenetic-modifying enzyme activity: structure - function relationships and the therapeutic potential for cancer. Curr. Med. Chem. 2010;17(17):1756–1768. doi: 10.2174/092986710791111161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 269.Wang L.S., Kuo C.T., Cho S.J., Seguin C., Siddiqui J., Stoner K., Weng Y.I., Huang T.H., Tichelaar J., Yearsley M., Stoner G.D., Huang Y.W. Black raspberry-derived anthocyanins demethylate tumor suppressor genes through the inhibition of DNMT1 and DNMT3B in colon cancer cells. Nutr. Cancer. 2013;65(1):118–125. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2013.741759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 270.Henning S.M., Wang P., Carpenter C.L., Heber D. Epigenetic effects of green tea polyphenols in cancer. Epigenomics. 2013;5(6):729–741. doi: 10.2217/epi.13.57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 271.Saha K., Hornyak T.J., Eckert R.L. Epigenetic cancer prevention mechanisms in skin cancer. AAPS J. 2013;15(4):1064–1071. doi: 10.1208/s12248-013-9513-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 272.Henning S.M., Wang P., Said J., Magyar C., Castor B., Doan N., Tosity C., Moro A., Gao K., Li L., Heber D. Polyphenols in brewed green tea inhibit prostate tumor xenograft growth by localizing to the tumor and decreasing oxidative stress and angiogenesis. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2012;23(11):1537–1542. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2011.10.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 273.Ho E., Beaver L.M., Williams D.E., Dashwood R.H. Dietary factors and epigenetic regulation for prostate cancer prevention. Adv. Nutr. 2011;2(6):497–510. doi: 10.3945/an.111.001032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 274.Link A., Balaguer F., Goel A. Cancer chemoprevention by dietary polyphenols: promising role for epigenetics. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2010;80(12):1771–1792. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2010.06.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 275.Dou Q.P. Molecular mechanisms of green tea polyphenols. Nutr. Cancer. 2009;61(6):827–835. doi: 10.1080/01635580903285049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 276.Fang M., Chen D., Yang C.S. Dietary polyphenols may affect DNA methylation. J. Nutr. 2007;137(Suppl. 1):223S–228S. doi: 10.1093/jn/137.1.223S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 277.Pandey M., Shukla S., Gupta S. Promoter demethylation and chromatin remodeling by green tea polyphenols leads to re-expression of GSTP1 in human prostate cancer cells. Int. J. Cancer. 2010;126(11):2520–2533. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 278.Thakur V.S., Deb G., Babcook M.A., Gupta S. Plant phytochemicals as epigenetic modulators: role in cancer chemoprevention. AAPS J. 2014;16(1):151–163. doi: 10.1208/s12248-013-9548-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 279.Fang M.Z., Wang Y., Ai N., Hou Z., Sun Y., Lu H., Welsh W., Yang C.S. Tea polyphenol (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate inhibits DNA methyltransferase and reactivates methylation-silenced genes in cancer cell lines. Cancer Res. 2003;63(22):7563–7570. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 280.Lu Q.Y., Jin Y.S., Zhang Z.F., Le A.D., Heber D., Li F.P., Dubinett S.M., Rao J.Y. Green tea induces annexin-I expression in human lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells: involvement of annexin-I in actin remodeling. Lab. Invest. 2007;87(5):456–465. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3700534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 281.Xiao G.S., Jin Y.S., Lu Q.Y., Zhang Z.F., Belldegrun A., Figlin R., Pantuck A., Yen Y., Li F., Rao J. Annexin-I as a potential target for green tea extract induced actin remodeling. Int. J. Cancer. 2007;120(1):111–120. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 282.Gao Z., Xu Z., Hung M.S., Lin Y.C., Wang T., Gong M., Zhi X., Jablon D.M., You L. Promoter demethylation of WIF-1 by epigallocatechin-3-gallate in lung cancer cells. Anticancer Res. 2009;29(6):2025–2030. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 283.Nandakumar V., Vaid M., Katiyar S.K. (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate reactivates silenced tumor suppressor genes, Cip1/p21 and p16INK4a, by reducing DNA methylation and increasing histones acetylation in human skin cancer cells. Carcinogenesis. 2011;32(4):537–544. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgq285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 284.Kato K., Long N.K., Makita H., Toida M., Yamashita T., Hatakeyama D., Hara A., Mori H., Shibata T. Effects of green tea polyphenol on methylation status of RECK gene and cancer cell invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma cells. Br. J. Cancer. 2008;99(4):647–654. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 285.Volate S.R., Muga S.J., Issa A.Y., Nitcheva D., Smith T., Wargovich M.J. Epigenetic modulation of the retinoid X receptor alpha by green tea in the azoxymethane-Apc Min/+ mouse model of intestinal cancer. Mol. Carcinog. 2009;48(10):920–933. doi: 10.1002/mc.20542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 286.Berletch J.B., Liu C., Love W.K., Andrews L.G., Katiyar S.K., Tollefsbol T.O. Epigenetic and genetic mechanisms contribute to telomerase inhibition by EGCG. J. Cell. Biochem. 2008;103(2):509–519. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 287.Moseley V.R., Morris J., Knackstedt R.W., Wargovich M.J. Green tea polyphenol epigallocatechin 3-gallate, contributes to the degradation of DNMT3A and HDAC3 in HCT 116 human colon cancer cells. Anticancer Res. 2013;33(12):5325–5333. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 288.Fang M.Z., Chen D., Sun Y., Jin Z., Christman J.K., Yang C.S. Reversal of hypermethylation and reactivation of p16INK4a, RARbeta, and MGMT genes by genistein and other isoflavones from soy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005;11(19, Pt 1):7033–7041. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 289.King-Batoon A., Leszczynskam J.M., Klein C.B. Modulation of gene methylation by genistein or lycopene in breast cancer cells. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2008;49(1):36–45. doi: 10.1002/em.20363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 290.Majid S., Dar A.A., Ahmad A.E., Hirata H., Kawakami K., Shahryari V., Saini S., Tanaka Y., Dahiya A.V., Khatri G., Dahiya R. BTG3 tumor suppressor gene promoter demethylation, histone modification and cell cycle arrest by genistein in renal cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30(4):662–670. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgp042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 291.Zhang Y., Li Q. Chen, H. DNA methylation and histone modifications of Wnt genes by genistein during colon cancer development. Carcinogenesis. 2013;34(8):1756–1763. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgt129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 292.Wang Z., Chen H. Genistein increases gene expression by demethylation of WNT5a promoter in colon cancer cell line SW1116. Anticancer Res. 2010;30(11):4537–4545. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 293.Tan S., Wang C., Lu C., Zhao B., Cui Y., Shi X., Ma X. Quercetin is able to demethylate the p16INK4a gene promoter. Chemotherapy. 2008;55(1):6–10. doi: 10.1159/000166383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 294.Gibellini L., Pinti M., Nasi M., Montagna J.P., De Biasi S., Roat E., Bertoncelli L., Cooper E.L., Cossarizza A. 2011.
  • 295.Medina-Franco J.L., López-Vallejo F., Kuck D., Lyko F. Natural compounds as DNA methyltransferase inhibitors: a computer-aided discovery approach. Mol. Divers. 2011;15(2):293–304. doi: 10.1007/s11030-010-9262-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 296.Liu Z., Xie Z., Jones W., Pavlovicz R.E., Liu S., Yu J., Li P.K., Lin J., Fuchs J.R., Marcucci G., Li C., Chan K.K. Curcumin is a potent DNA hypomethylation agent. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009;19(3):706–709. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.12.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 297.Yu S., Khor T.O., Cheung K.L., Li W., Wu T.Y., Huang Y., Foster B.A., Kan Y.W., Kong A.N. Nrf2 expression is regulated by epigenetic mechanisms in prostate cancer of TRAMP mice. PLoS One. 2010;5:e8579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 298.Khor T.O., Huang Y., Wu T.Y., Shu L., Lee J., Kong A.N. Pharmacodynamics of curcumin as DNA hypomethylation agent in restoring the expression of Nrf2 via promoter CpGs demethylation. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2011;82(9):1073–1078. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2011.07.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 299.Shu L., Khor T.O., Lee J.H., Boyanapalli S.S., Huang Y., Wu T.Y., Saw C.L., Cheung K.L., Kong A.N. Epigenetic CpG demethylation of the promoter and reactivation of the expression of Neurog1 by curcumin in prostate LNCaP cells. AAPS J. 2011;13(4):606–614. doi: 10.1208/s12248-011-9300-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 300.Jha A.K., Nikbakht M., Parashar G., Shrivastava A., Capalash N., Kaur J. Reversal of hypermethylation and reactivation of the RARβ2 gene by natural compounds in cervical cancer cell lines. Folia Biol. (Praha) 2010;56(5):195–200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 301.Royston K.J., Tollefsbol T.O. The Epigenetic Impact of Cruciferous Vegetables on Cancer Prevention. Curr. Pharmacol. Rep. 2015;1(1):46–51. doi: 10.1007/s40495-014-0003-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 302.Haack M., Löwinger M., Lippmann D., Kipp A., Pagnotta E., Iori R., Monien B.H., Glatt H., Brauer M.N., Wessjohann L.A., Brigelius-Flohé R. Breakdown compounds of neoglucobrassicin inhibit activation of Nrf2 target genes mediated by myrosinase-derived glucoraphanin hydrolysis compounds. Biol. Chem. 2010;391(11):1281–1293. doi: 10.1515/BC.2010.134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 303.Verhoeven D.T., Verhagen H., Goldbohm R.A., van den Brandt P.A., van Poppel G. A review of mechanisms underlying anticarcinogenicity by brassica vegetables. Chem. Biol. Interact. 1997;103(2):79–129. doi: 10.1016/s0009-2797(96)03745-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 304.Clarke J.D., Dashwood R.H., Ho E. Multi-targeted prevention of cancer by sulforaphane. Cancer Lett. 2008;269(2):291–304. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.04.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 305.Traka M., Gasper A.V., Smith J.A., Hawkey C.J., Bao Y., Mithen R.F. Transcriptome analysis of human colon Caco-2 cells exposed to sulforaphane. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2005;135(8):1865–1872. doi: 10.1093/jn/135.8.1865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 306.Meeran S.M., Patel S.N., Tollefsbol T.O. Sulforaphane causes epigenetic repression of human TERT expression in human breast cancer cell lines. PLoS One. 2010;5(7):e11457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 307.Wong C.P., Hsu A., Buchanan A., Palomera-Sanchez Z., Beaver L.M., Houseman E.A., Williams D.E., Dashwood R.H., Ho E. Effects of sulforaphane and 3,3'-diindolylmethane on genome-wide promoter methylation in normal prostate epithelial cells and prostate cancer cells. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e86787. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 308.Cheung K.L., Kong A.N. Molecular targets of dietary phenethyl isothiocyanate and sulforaphane for cancer chemoprevention. AAPS J. 2010;12(1):87–97. doi: 10.1208/s12248-009-9162-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 309.Wang L.G., Beklemisheva A., Liu X.M., Ferrari A.C., Feng J., Chiao J.W. Dual action on promoter demethylation and chromatin by an isothiocyanate restored GSTP1 silenced in prostate cancer. Mol. Carcinog. 2007;46(1):24–31. doi: 10.1002/mc.20258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 310.Liu M., Iavarone A., Freedman L.P. Transcriptional activation of the human p21 (WAF1/ CIP1) gene by retinoic acid receptor. Correlation with retinoid induction of U937 cell differentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 1996;271(49):31723–31728. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.49.31723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 311.Benkoussa M., Brand C., Delmotte M.H., Formstecher P., Lefebvre P. Retinoic acid receptors inhibit AP1 activation by regulating extracellular signal-regulated kinase and CBP recruitment to an AP1-responsive promoter. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002;22(13):4522–4534. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.13.4522-4534.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 312.Arany I., Whitehead W.E., Ember I.A., Tyring S.K. Dose-dependent activation of p21/ WAF1 transcription by all-trans-acid in cervical squamous carcinoma cells. Anticancer Res. 2003;23(1A):495–497. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 313.Wu Q., Chen Z.M., Su W.J. Anticancer effect of retinoic acid via AP-1 activity repression is mediated by retinoic acid receptor alpha and beta in gastric cancer cells. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2002;34(9):1102–1114. doi: 10.1016/s1357-2725(02)00030-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 314.Iida T., Suetake I., Tajima S., Morioka H., Ohta S., Obuse C., Tsurimoto T. PCNA clamp facilitates action of DNA cytosine methyltransferase 1 on hemimethylated DNA. Genes Cells. 2002;7(10):997–1007. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2443.2002.00584.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 315.Liu X., Gao Q., Li P., Zhao Q., Zhang J., Li J., Koseki H., Wong J. UHRF1 targets DNMT1 for DNA methylation through cooperative binding of hemi-methylated DNA and methylated H3K9. Nat. Commun. 2013;4:1563. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 316.Hervouet E., Lalier L., Debien E., Cheray M., Geairon A., Rogniaux H., Loussouarn D., Martin S.A., Vallette F.M., Cartron P.F. Disruption of Dnmt1/PCNA/UHRF1 interactions promotes tumorigenesis from human and mice glial cells. PLoS One. 2010;5(6):e11333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 317.Hervouet E., Vallette F.M., Cartron P.F. Dnmt1/Transcription factor interactions: an alternative mechanism of DNA methylation inheritance. Genes Cancer. 2010;1(5):434–443. doi: 10.1177/1947601910373794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 318.Jeong S., Liang G., Sharma S., Lin J.C., Choi S.H., Han H., Yoo C.B., Egger G., Yang A.S., Jones P.A. Selective anchoring of DNA methyltransferases 3A and 3B to nucleosomes containing methylated DNA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2009;29(19):5366–5376. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00484-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 319.Pacaud R., Brocard E., Lalier L., Hervouet E., Vallette F.M., Cartron P.F. The DNMT1/PCNA/UHRF1 disruption induces tumorigenesis characterized by similar genetic and epigenetic signatures. Sci. Rep. 2014;4:4230. doi: 10.1038/srep04230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 320.Chuang L.S., Ian H.I., Koh T.W., Ng H.H., Xu G., Li B.F. Human DNA- (cytosine-5) methyltransferase-PCNA complex as a target for p21WAF1. Science. 1997;277(5334):1996–2000. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5334.1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 321.Scott M.T., Morrice N., Ball K.L. Reversible phosphorylation at the C-terminal regulatory domain of p21 (Waf1/Cip1) modulates proliferating cell nuclear antigen binding. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275(15):11529–11537. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.15.11529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 322.Bigey P., Ramchandani S., Theberge J., Araujo F.D., Szyf M. Transcriptional regulation of the human DNA Methyltransferase (dnmt1) gene. Gene. 2000;242(1-2):407–418. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(99)00501-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 323.Fu W.N., Bertoni F., Kelsey S.M., McElwaine S.M., Cotter F.E., Newland A.C., Jia L. Role of DNA methylation in the suppression of Apaf-1 protein in human leukaemia. Oncogene. 2003;22(3):451–455. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 324.Schmelz K., Wagner M., Dörken B., Tamm I. 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine induces p21WAF expression by demethylation of p73 leading to p53-independent apoptosis in myeloid leukemia. Int. J. Cancer. 2005;114(5):683–695. doi: 10.1002/ijc.20797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 325.Furukawa Y., Sutheesophon K., Wada T., Nishimura M., Saito Y., Ishii H., Furukawa Y. Methylation silencing of the Apaf-1 gene in acute leukemia. Mol. Cancer Res. 2005;3(6):325–334. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-04-0105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 326.Pulukuri S.M., Rao J.S. Activation of p53/p21Waf1/Cip1 pathway by 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine inhibits cell proliferation, induces pro-apoptotic genes and mitogen-activated protein kinases in human prostate cancer cells. Int. J. Oncol. 2005;26(4):863–871. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 327.Murphy T.M., Perry A.S., Lawler M. The emergence of DNA methylation as a key modulator of aberrant cell death in prostate cancer. Endocr. Relat. Cancer. 2008;15(1):11–25. doi: 10.1677/ERC-07-0208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 328.Basu I., Cordovano G., Das I., Belbin T.J., Guha C., Schramm V.L. A transition state analogue of 5'-methylthioadenosine phosphorylase induces apoptosis in head and neck cancers. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282(29):21477–21486. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M702287200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 329.Das P.M., Thor A.D., Edgerton S.M., Barry S.K., Chen D.F., Jones F.E. Reactivation of epigenetically silenced HER4/ERBB4 results in apoptosis of breast tumor cells. Oncogene. 2010;29(37):5214–5219. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 330.Pulling L.C., Grimes M.J., Damiani L.A., Juri D.E., Do K., Tellez C.S., Belinsky S.A. Dual promoter regulation of death-associated protein kinase gene leads to differentially silenced transcripts by methylation in cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30(12):2023–2030. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgp276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 331.Yang H., Lu X., Qian J., Xu F., Hu Y., Yu Y., Bast R.C., Li J. Imprinted tumor suppressor gene ARHI induces apoptosis correlated with changes in DNA methylation in pancreatic cancer cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2010;3(4):581–587. doi: 10.3892/mmr_00000301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 332.Stefanska B., Suderman M., Machnes Z., Bhattacharyya B., Hallett M., Szyf M. Transcription onset of genes critical in liver carcinogenesis is epigenetically regulated by methylated DNA-binding protein MBD2. Carcinogenesis. 2013;34(12):2738–2749. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgt273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 333.Stefanska B., Rudnicka K., Bednarek A., Fabianowska-Majewska K. Hypomethylation and induction of retinoic acid receptor beta 2 by concurrent action of adenosine analogues and natural compounds in breast cancer cells. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2010;638(1-3):47–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.04.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 334.Stallings R.L., Foley N.H., Bray I.M., Das S., Buckley P.G. MicroRNA and DNA methylation alterations mediating retinoic acid induced neuroblastoma cell differentiation. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2011;21(4):283–290. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2011.07.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 335.Das S., Foley N., Bryan K., Watters K.M., Bray I., Murphy D.M., Buckley P.G., Stallings R.L. MicroRNA mediates DNA demethylation events triggered by retinoic acid during neuroblastoma cell differentiation. Cancer Res. 2010;70:7874–7881. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 336.Shukla S., Khan S., Kumar S., Sinha S., Farhan M., Bora H.K., Maurya R., Meeran S.M., Cucurbitacin B. Alters the Expression of Tumor-Related Genes by Epigenetic Modifications in NSCLC and Inhibits NNK-Induced Lung Tumorigenesis. Cancer Prev. Res. (Phila.) 2015;8(60):552–562. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-14-0286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 337.Su Z.Y., Khor T.O., Shu L., Lee J.H., Saw C.L., Wu T.Y., Huang Y., Suh N., Yang C.S., Conney A.H., Wu Q., Kong A.N. Epigenetic reactivation of Nrf2 in murine prostate cancer TRAMP C1 cells by natural phytochemicals Z-ligustilide and Radix angelica sinensis via promoter CpG demethylation. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2013;26(3):477–485. doi: 10.1021/tx300524p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 338.Weng J.R., Lai I.L., Yang H.C., Lin C.N., Bai L.Y. Identification of kazinol Q, a natural compound from Formosan plants, as an inhibitor of DNA methyltransferase. Phytother. Res. 2014;28(1):49–54. doi: 10.1002/ptr.4955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 339.Naselli F., Tesoriere L., Caradonna F., Bellavia D., Attanzio A., Gentile C., Livrea M.A. Anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic activity of whole extract and isolated indicaxanthin from Opuntia ficus-indica associated with re-activation of the onco-suppressor p16 (INK4a) gene in human colorectal carcinoma (Caco-2) cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014;450(1):652–658. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.06.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 340.Fini L., Selgrad M., Fogliano V., Graziani G., Romano M., Hotchkiss E., Daoud Y.A., De Vol E.B., Boland C.R., Ricciardiello L. Annurca apple polyphenols have potent demethylating activity and can reactivate silenced tumor suppressor genes in colorectal cancer cells. J. Nutr. 2007;137(12):2622–2628. doi: 10.1093/jn/137.12.2622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 341.Lee W.J., Zhu B.T. Inhibition of DNA methylation by caffeic acid and chlorogenic acid, two common catechol-containing coffee polyphenols. Carcinogenesis. 2006;27(2):269–277. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgi206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 342.Niemann H., Marmann A., Lin W., Proksch P. Sponge derived bromotyrosines: structural diversity through natural combinatorial chemistry. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2015;10(1):219–231. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 343.Kim S.L., Liu Y.C., Seo S.Y., Kim S.H., Kim I.H., Lee S.O., Lee S.T., Kim D.G., Kim S.W. Parthenolide induces apoptosis in colitis-associated colon cancer, inhibiting NF-κB signaling. Oncol. Lett. 2015;9(5):2135–2142. doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.3017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 344.Song J.M., Qian X., Upadhyayya P., Hong K.H., Kassie F. Dimethylamino-parthenolide, a water-soluble parthenolide, suppresses lung tumorigenesis through down-regulating the STAT3 signaling pathway. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets. 2014;14(1):59–69. doi: 10.2174/15680096113136660108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 345.Singh V., Sharma P., Capalash N. DNA methyltransferase-1 inhibitors as epigenetic therapy for cancer. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets. 2013;13(4):379–399. doi: 10.2174/15680096113139990077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 346.Ghantous A., Saikali M., Rau T., Gali-Muhtasib H., Schneider-Stock R., Darwiche N. Inhibition of tumor promotion by parthenolide: epigenetic modulation of p21. Cancer Prev. Res. (Phila.) 2012;5(11):1298–1309. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-12-0230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 347.Gopal Y.N., Chanchorn E., Van Dyke M.W. Parthenolide promotes the ubiquitination of MDM2 and activates p53 cellular functions. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2009;8(3):552–562. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-0661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 348.Yip-Schneider M.T., Nakshatri H., Sweeney C.J., Marshall M.S., Wiebke E.A., Schmidt C.M. Parthenolide and sulindac cooperate to mediate growth suppression and inhibit the nuclear factor-kappa B pathway in pancreatic carcinoma cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2005;4(4):587–594. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-04-0215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 349.Zhang S., Lin Z.N., Yang C.F., Shi X., Ong C.N., Shen H.M. Suppressed NF-kappaB and sustained JNK activation contribute to the sensitization effect of parthenolide to TNF-alpha-induced apoptosis in human cancer cells. Carcinogenesis. 2004;25(11):2191–2199. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgh234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 350.Liu Z., Liu S., Xie Z., Pavlovicz R.E., Wu J., Chen P., Aimiuwu J., Pang J., Bhasin D., Neviani P., Fuchs J.R., Plass C., Li P.K., Li C., Huang T.H., Wu L.C., Rush L., Wang H., Perrotti D., Marcucci G., Chan K.K. Modulation of DNA methylation by a sesquiterpene lactone parthenolide. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2009;329(2):505–514. doi: 10.1124/jpet.108.147934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 351.Liu F., Liu Q., Yang D., Bollag W.B., Robertson K., Wu P., Liu K. Verticillin A overcomes apoptosis resistance in human colon carcinoma through DNA methylation-dependent upregulation of BNIP3. Cancer Res. 2011;71(21):6807–6816. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-1575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 352.Friso S., Choi S.W., Girelli D., Mason J.B., Dolnikowski G.G., Bagley P.J., Olivieri O., Jacques P.F., Rosenberg I.H., Corrocher R., Selhub J. A common mutation in the 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene affects genomic DNA methylation through an interaction with folate status. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99(8):5606–5611. doi: 10.1073/pnas.062066299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 353.Selhub J. Folate, vitamin B12 and vitamin B6 and one carbon metabolism. J. Nutr. Health Aging. 2002;6(1):39–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 354.James S.J., Pogribny I.P., Pogribna M., Miller B.J., Jernigan S., Melnyk S. Mechanisms of DNA damage, DNA hypomethylation, and tumor progression in the folate/methyl-deficient rat model of hepatocarcinogenesis. J. Nutr. 2003;133(11) Suppl. 1:3740S–3747S. doi: 10.1093/jn/133.11.3740S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 355.Davis C.D., Uthus E.O. DNA methylation, cancer susceptibility, and nutrient interactions. Exp. Biol. Med. (Maywood) 2004;229(10):988–995. doi: 10.1177/153537020422901002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 356.Ghoshal K., Li X., Datta J., Bai S., Pogribny I., Pogribny M., Huang Y., Young D., Jacob S.T. A folate- and methyl-deficient diet alters the expression of DNA methyltransferases and methyl CpG binding proteins involved in epigenetic gene silencing in livers of F344 rats. J. Nutr. 2006;136(6):1522–1527. doi: 10.1093/jn/136.6.1522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 357.Du Q., Luu P.L., Stirzaker C., Clark S.J. Methyl-CpG-binding domain proteins: readers of the epigenome. Epigenomics. 2015 doi: 10.2217/epi.15.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 358.Lubecka-Pietruszewska K., Kaufman-Szymczyk A., Stefanska B., Fabianowska-Majewska K. Folic acid enforces DNA methylation-mediated transcriptional silencing of PTEN, APC and RARbeta2 tumour suppressor genes in breast cancer. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013;430(2):623–628. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.11.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 359.Sawan C., Herceg Z. Histone modifications and cancer. Adv. Genet. 2010;70:57–85. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-380866-0.60003-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 360.Zhou J., Fan J.Y., Rangasamy D., Tremethick D.J. The nucleosome surface regulates chromatin compaction and couples it with transcriptional repression. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2007;14(11):1070–1076. doi: 10.1038/nsmb1323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 361.Kouzarides T. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell. 2007;128:693–705. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 362.Bartholomew B. Regulating the chromatin landscape: structural and mechanistic perspectives. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2014;83:671–696. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-051810-093157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 363.Petty E., Pillus L. Balancing chromatin remodeling and histone modifications in transcription. Trends Genet. 2013;29(11):621–629. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2013.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 364.Nair S.S., Kumar R. Chromatin remodeling in cancer: a gateway to regulate gene transcription. Mol. Oncol. 2012;6(6):611–619. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2012.09.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 365.Dawson M.A., Kouzarides T. Cancer epigenetics: from mechanism to therapy. Cell. 2012;150(1):12–27. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 366.Svejstrup J.Q. The interface between transcription and mechanisms maintaining genome integrity. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2010;35(6):333–338. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2010.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 367.Yost J.M., Korboukh I., Liu F., Gao C., Jin J. Targets in epigenetics: inhibiting the methyl writers of the histone code. Curr. Chem. Genomics. 2011;5(Suppl. 1):72–84. doi: 10.2174/1875397301005010072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 368.Jenuwein T., Allis C.D. Translating the histone code. Science. 2001;293(5532):1074–1080. doi: 10.1126/science.1063127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 369.Bannister A.J., Kouzarides T. Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Res. 2011;21(3):381–395. doi: 10.1038/cr.2011.22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 370.Rajendran P., Williams D.E., Ho E., Dashwood R.H. Metabolism as a key to histone deacetylase inhibition. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2011;46:181–199. doi: 10.3109/10409238.2011.557713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 371.Gao L., Cueto M.A., Asselbergs F., Atadja P. Cloning and functional characterization of HDAC11, a novel member of the human histone deacetylase family. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277(28):25748–25755. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111871200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 372.Deubzer H.E., Schier M.C., Oehme I., Lodrini M., Haendler B., Sommer A., Witt O. HDAC11 is a novel drug target in carcinomas. Int. J. Cancer. 2013;132(9):2200–2208. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 373.Ito A., Kawaguchi Y., Lai C.H., Kovacs J.J., Higashimoto Y., Appella E., Yao T.P. MDM2-HDAC1-mediated deacetylation of p53 is required for its degradation. EMBO J. 2002;21(22):6236–6245. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 374.Arora A., Gera S., Maheshwari T., Raghav D., Alam M.J., Singh R.K., Agarwal S.M. The dynamics of stress p53-Mdm2 network regulated by p300 and HDAC1. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e52736. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 375.Karagianni P., Wong J. HDAC3: taking the SMRT-N-CoRrect road to repression. Oncogene. 2007;26(37):5439–5449. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 376.Wade P.A. Transcriptional control at regulatory checkpoints by histone deacetylases: molecular connections between cancer and chromatin. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2001;10(7):693–698. doi: 10.1093/hmg/10.7.693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 377.Parra M., Verdin E. Regulatory signal transduction pathways for class IIa histone deacetylases. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2010;10(4):454–460. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2010.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 378.Lakshmaiah K.C., Jacob L.A., Aparna S., Lokanatha D., Saldanha S.C. Epigenetic therapy of cancer with histone deacetylase inhibitors. J. Cancer Res. Ther. 2014;10(3):469–478. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.137937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 379.Dobosy J.R., Selker E.U. Emerging connections between DNA methylation and histone acetylation. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2001;58(5-6):721–727. doi: 10.1007/PL00000895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 380.Rice J.C., Allis C.D. Histone methylation versus histone acetylation: new insights into epigenetic regulation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2001;13(3):263–273. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(00)00208-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 381.Herranz M., Esteller M. DNA methylation and histone modifications in patients with cancer: potential prognostic and therapeutic targets. Methods Mol. Biol. 2007;361:25–62. doi: 10.1385/1-59745-208-4:25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 382.Rose N.R., Klose R.J. Understanding the relationship between DNA methylation and histone lysine methylation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2014;1839(12):1362–1372. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 383.Greer E.L., Shi Y. Histone methylation: a dynamic mark in health, disease and inheritance. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012;13(5):343–357. doi: 10.1038/nrg3173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 384.Albert M., Helin K. Histone methyltransferases in cancer. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2010;21(2):209–220. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 385.Pal S., Sif S. Interplay between chromatin remodelers and protein arginine methyltransferases. J. Cell. Physiol. 2007;213(2):306–315. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 386.Lee Y.H., Stallcup M.R. Minireview: protein arginine methylation of nonhistone proteins in transcriptional regulation. Mol. Endocrinol. 2009;23(4):425–433. doi: 10.1210/me.2008-0380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 387.Cha B., Jho E.H. Protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs) as therapeutic targets. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets. 2012;16(7):651–664. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2012.688030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 388.Hon G.C., Hawkins R.D., Caballero O.L., Lo C., Lister R., Pelizzola M., Valsesia A., Ye Z., Kuan S., Edsall L.E., Camargo A.A., Stevenson B.J., Ecker J.R., Bafna V., Strausberg R.L., Simpson A.J., Ren B. Global DNA hypomethylation coupled to repressive chromatin domain formation and gene silencing in breast cancer. Genome Res. 2012;22(2):246–258. doi: 10.1101/gr.125872.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 389.Barski A., Cuddapah S., Cui K., Roh T.Y., Schones D.E., Wang Z., Wei G., Chepelev I., Zhao K. High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell. 2007;129(4):823–837. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 390.Li B., Carey M., Workman J.L. The role of chromatin during transcription. Cell. 2007;128(4):707–719. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 391.Mosammaparast N., Shi Y. Reversal of histone methylation: biochemical and molecular mechanisms of histone demethylases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2010;79:155–179. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.070907.103946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 392.Varier R.A., Timmers H.T. Histone lysine methylation and demethylation pathways in cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2011;1815(1):75–89. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2010.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 393.Völkel P., Dupret B., Le Bourhis X., Angrand P.O. Diverse involvement of EZH2 in cancer epigenetics. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2015;7(2):175–193. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 394.McCabe M.T., Creasy C.L. EZH2 as a potential target in cancer therapy. Epigenomics. 2014;6(3):341–351. doi: 10.2217/epi.14.23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 395.Yamaguchi H., Hung M.C. Regulation and Role of EZH2 in Cancer. Cancer Res. Treat. 2014;46(3):209–222. doi: 10.4143/crt.2014.46.3.209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 396.Chang C.J., Hung M.C. The role of EZH2 in tumour progression. Br. J. Cancer. 2012;106(2):243–247. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 397.Culhane J.C., Cole P.A. LSD1 and the chemistry of histone demethylation. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2007;11(5):561–568. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.07.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 398.Amente S., Lania L., Majello B. The histone LSD1 demethylase in stemness and cancer transcription programs. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2013;1829(10):981–986. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2013.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 399.Chen Y., Jie W., Yan W., Zhou K., Xiao Y. Lysine-specific histone demethylase 1 (LSD1): A potential molecular target for tumor therapy. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 2012;22(1):53–59. doi: 10.1615/critreveukargeneexpr.v22.i1.40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 400.Dhar S., Kumar A., Li K., Tzivion G., Levenson A.S. Resveratrol regulates PTEN/Akt pathway through inhibition of MTA1/HDAC unit of the NuRD complex in prostate cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2015;1853(2):265–275. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2014.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 401.Kai L., Samuel S.K., Levenson A.S. Resveratrol enhances p53 acetylation and apoptosis in prostate cancer by inhibiting MTA1/NuRD complex. Int. J. Cancer. 2010;126(7):1538–1548. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 402.Li K., Dias S.J., Rimando A.M., Dhar S., Mizuno C.S., Penman A.D., Lewin J.R., Levenson A.S. Pterostilbene acts through metastasis-associated protein 1 to inhibit tumor growth, progression and metastasis in prostate cancer. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 403.Pietrocola F., Mariño G., Lissa D., Vacchelli E., Malik S.A., Niso-Santano M., Zamzami N., Galluzzi L., Maiuri M.C., Kroemer G. Pro-autophagic polyphenols reduce the acetylation of cytoplasmic proteins. Cell Cycle. 2012;11(20):3851–3860. doi: 10.4161/cc.22027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 404.Roy S.K., Chen Q., Fu J., Shankar S., Srivastava R.K. Resveratrol inhibits growth of orthotopic pancreatic tumors through activation of FOXO transcription factors. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e25166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 405.Chen Q., Ganapathy S., Singh K.P., Shankar S., Srivastava R.K. Resveratrol induces growth arrest and apoptosis through activation of FOXO transcription factors in prostate cancer cells. PLoS One. 2010;5(12):e15288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 406.Ganapathy S., Chen Q., Singh K.P., Shankar S., Srivastava R.K. Resveratrol Enhances Antitumor Activity of TRAIL in Prostate Cancer Xenografts through Activation of FOXO Transcription Factor. PLoS One. 2010;5(12):e15627. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 407.Woo H.J., Lee S.J., Choi B.T., Park Y.M., Choi Y.H. Induction of apoptosis and inhibition of telomerase activity by trichostatin A, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, in human leukemic U937 cells. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 2007;82(1):77–84. doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2006.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 408.Furumai R., Matsuyama A., Kobashi N., Lee K.H., Nishiyama M., Nakajima H., Tanaka A., Komatsu Y., Nishino N., Yoshida M., Horinouchi S. FK228 (depsipeptide) as a natural prodrug that inhibits class I histone deacetylases. Cancer Res. 2002;62(17):4916–4921. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 409.Konstantinopoulos P.A., Vandoros G.P., Papavassiliou A.G. FK228 (depsipeptide): a HDAC inhibitor with pleiotropic antitumor activities. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2006;58(5):711–715. doi: 10.1007/s00280-005-0182-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 410.Watanabe M., Adachi S., Matsubara H., Imai T., Yui Y., Mizushima Y., Hiraumi Y., Watanabe K., Kamitsuji Y., Toyokuni S.Y., Hosoi H., Sugimoto T., Toguchida J., Nakahata T. Induction of autophagy in malignant rhabdoid tumor cells by the histone deacetylase inhibitor FK228 through AIF translocation. Int. J. Cancer. 2009;124(1):55–67. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 411.Akare S., Jean-Louis S., Chen W., Wood D.J., Powell A.A., Martinez J.D. Ursodeoxycholic acid modulates histone acetylation and induces differentiation and senescence. Int. J. Cancer. 2006;119(12):2958–2969. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 412.Marcu M.G., Jung Y.J., Lee S., Chung E.J., Lee M.J., Trepel J., Neckers L. Curcumin is an inhibitor of p300 histone acetylatransferase. Med. Chem. 2006;2(2):169–174. doi: 10.2174/157340606776056133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 413.Balasubramanyam K., Varier R.A., Altaf M., Swaminathan V., Siddappa N.B., Ranga U., Kundu T.K. Curcumin, a novel p300/CREB-binding protein-specific inhibitor of acetyltransferase, represses the acetylation of histone/nonhistone proteins and histone acetyltransferase-dependent chromatin transcription. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279(49):51163–51171. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M409024200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 414.Liu H.L., Chen Y., Cui G.H., Zhou J.F. Curcumin, a potent anti-tumor reagent, is a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor regulating B-NHL cell line Raji proliferation. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2005;26(5):603–609. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7254.2005.00081.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 415.Lee S.J., Krauthauser C., Maduskuie V., Fawcett P.T., Olson J.M., Rajasekaran S.A. Curcumin-induced HDAC inhibition and attenuation of medulloblastoma growth in vitro and in vivo. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:144. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 416.Hua W.F., Fu Y.S., Liao Y.J., Xia W.J., Chen Y.C., Zeng Y.X., Kung H.F., Xie D. Curcumin induces down-regulation of EZH2 expression through the MAPK pathway in MDA-MB-435 human breast cancer cells. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2010;637(1-3):16–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.03.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 417.de Boer V.C., de Goffau M.C., Arts I.C., Hollman P.C., Keijer J. SIRT1 stimulation by polyphenols is affected by their stability and metabolism. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2006;127(7):618–627. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2006.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 418.Hong K.S., Park J.I., Kim M.J., Kim H.B., Lee J.W., Dao T.T., Oh W.K., Kang C.D., Kim S.H. Involvement of SIRT1 in hypoxic down-regulation of c-Myc and β-catenin and hypoxic preconditioning effect of polyphenols. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2012;259(2):210–218. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2011.12.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 419.Ruiz P.A., Braune A., Hölzlwimmer G., Quintanilla-Fend L., Haller D. Quercetin inhibits TNF-induced NF-kappaB transcription factor recruitment to proinflammatory gene promoters in murine intestinal epithelial cells. J. Nutr. 2007;137(5):1208–1215. doi: 10.1093/jn/137.5.1208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 420.Lee W.J., Chen Y.R., Tseng T.H. Quercetin induces FasL-related apoptosis, in part, through promotion of histone H3 acetylation in human leukemia HL-60 cells. Oncol. Rep. 2011;25(2):583–591. doi: 10.3892/or.2010.1097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 421.Kim S.O., Kim M.R. (-)-Epigallocatechin 3-gallate inhibits invasion by inducing the expression of Raf kinase inhibitor protein in AsPC-1 human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells through the modulation of histone deacetylase activity. Int. J. Oncol. 2013;42(1):349–358. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2012.1686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 422.Deb G., Thakur V.S., Limaye A.M., Gupta S. Epigenetic induction of tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-3 by green tea polyphenols in breast cancer cells. Mol. Carcinog. 2015;54(6):485–499. doi: 10.1002/mc.22121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 423.Thakur V.S., Gupta K., Gupta S. Green tea polyphenols causes cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in prostate cancer cells by suppressing class I histone deacetylases. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33(2):377–384. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgr277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 424.Thakur V.S., Gupta K., Gupta S. Green tea polyphenols increase p53 transcriptional activity and acetylation by suppressing class I histone deacetylases. Int. J. Oncol. 2012;41(1):353–361. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2012.1449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 425.Gupta K., Thakur V.S., Bhaskaran N., Nawab A., Babcook M.A., Jackson M.W., Gupta S. Green tea polyphenols induce p53-dependent and p53-independent apoptosis in prostate cancer cells through two distinct mechanisms. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52572. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 426.Grossniklaus U., Paro R. Transcriptional silencing by polycomb-group proteins. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2014;6(11):a019331. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a019331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 427.Choudhury S.R., Balasubramanian S., Chew Y.C., Han B., Marquez V.E., Eckert R.L. (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate and DZNep reduce polycomb protein level via a proteasome-dependent mechanism in skin cancer cells. Carcinogenesis. 2011;32(10):1525–1532. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgr171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 428.Hong T., Nakagawa T., Pan W., Kim M.Y., Kraus W.L., Ikehara T., Yasui K., Aihara H., Takebe M., Muramatsu M., Ito T. Isoflavones stimulate estrogen receptor-mediated core histone acetylation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004;317(1):259–264. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.03.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 429.Majid S., Kikuno N., Nelles J., Noonan E., Tanaka Y., Kawamoto K., Hirata H., Li L.C., Zhao H., Okino S.T., Place R.F., Pookot D., Dahiya R. Genistein induces the p21WAF1/CIP1 and p16INK4a tumor suppressor genes in prostate cancer cells by epigenetic mechanisms involving active chromatin modification. Cancer Res. 2008;68(8):2736–2744. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 430.Basak S., Pookot D., Noonan E.J., Dahiya R. Genistein down-regulates androgen receptor by modulating HDAC6-Hsp90 chaperone function. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2008;7(10):3195–3202. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-0617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 431.Kikuno N., Shiina H., Urakami S., Kawamoto K., Hirata H., Tanaka Y., Place R.F., Pookot D., Majid S., Igawa M., Dahiya R. Knockdown of astrocyte-elevated gene-1 inhibits prostate cancer progression through upregulation of FOXO3a activity. Oncogene. 2007;26(55):7647–7655. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 432.Wang H., Li Q., Chen H. Genistein affects histone modifications on Dickkopf-related protein 1 (DKK1) gene in SW480 human colon cancer cell line. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40955. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 433.Ye R., Goodarzi A.A., Kurz E.U., Saito S., Higashimoto Y., Lavin M.F., Appella E., Anderson C.W., Lees-Miller S.P. The isoflavonoids genistein and quercetin activate different stress signaling pathways as shown by analysis of site-specific phosphorylation of ATM, p53 and histone H2AX. DNA Repair (Amst.) 2004;3(3):235–244. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2003.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 434.Gao Y., Tollefsbol T.O. Impact of Epigenetic Dietary Components on Cancer through Histone Modifications. Curr. Med. Chem. 2015;22(17):2051–2064. doi: 10.2174/0929867322666150420102641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 435.Rajendran P., Kidane A.I., Yu T.W., Dashwood W.M., Bisson W.H., Löhr C.V., Ho E., Williams D.E., Dashwood R.H. HDAC turnover, CtIP acetylation and dysregulated DNA damage signaling in colon cancer cells treated with sulforaphane and related dietary isothiocyanates. Epigenetics. 2013;8(6):612–623. doi: 10.4161/epi.24710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 436.Myzak M.C., Dashwood W.M., Orner G.A., Ho E., Dashwood R.H. Sulforaphane inhibits histone deacetylase in vivo and suppresses tumorigenesis in Apc-minus mice. FASEB J. 2006;20(3):506–508. doi: 10.1096/fj.05-4785fje. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 437.Myzak M.C., Tong P., Dashwood W.M., Dashwood R.H., Ho E. Sulforaphane retards the growth of human PC-3 xenografts and inhibits HDAC activity in human subjects. Exp. Biol. Med. (Maywood) 2007;232(2):227–234. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 438.Balasubramanian S., Chew Y.C., Eckert R.L. Sulforaphane suppresses polycomb group protein level via a proteasome-dependent mechanism in skin cancer cells. Mol. Pharmacol. 2011;80(5):870–878. doi: 10.1124/mol.111.072363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 439.Wang L.G., Beklemisheva A., Liu X.M., Ferrari A.C., Feng J., Chiao J.W. Dual action on promoter demethylation and chromatin by an isothiocyanate restored GSTP1 silenced in prostate cancer. Mol. Carcinog. 2007;46:24–31. doi: 10.1002/mc.20258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 440.Brew C.T., Aronchik I., Hsu J.C., Sheen J.H., Dickson R.B., Bjeldanes L.F., Firestone G.L. Indole-3-carbinol activates the ATM signaling pathway independent of DNA damage to stabilize p53 and induce G1 arrest of human mammary epithelial cells. Int. J. Cancer. 2006;118:857–868. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 441.Li Y., Li X., Guo B. Chemopreventive agent 3,3′-diindolylmethane selectively induces proteasomal degradation of class I histone deacetylases. Cancer Res. 2010;70:646–654. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 442.Schneider-Stock R., Ghantous A., Bajbouj K., Saikali M., Darwiche N. Epigenetic mechanisms of plant-derived anticancer drugs. Front. Biosci. (Landmark Ed.) 2012;17:129–173. doi: 10.2741/3919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 443.Ariga T., Seki T. Antithrombotic and anticancer effects of garlic-derived sulfur compounds: a review. Biofactors. 2006;26(2):93–103. doi: 10.1002/biof.5520260201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 444.Lea M.A., Randolph V.M., Lee J.E., desBordes C. Induction of histone acetylation in mouse erythroleukemia cells by some organosulfur compounds including allyl isothiocyanate. Int. J. Cancer. 2001;92(6):784–789. doi: 10.1002/ijc.1277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 445.Lea M.A., Rasheed M., Randolph V.M., Khan F., Shareef A., desBordes C. Induction of histone acetylation and inhibition of growth of mouse erythroleukemia cells by S-allylmercaptocysteine. Nutr. Cancer. 2002;43(1):90–102. doi: 10.1207/S15327914NC431_11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 446.Druesne N., Pagniez A., Mayeur C., Thomas M., Cherbuy C., Duée P.H., Martel P., Chaumontet C. Diallyl disulfide (DADS) increases histone acetylation and p21 (waf1/cip1) expression in human colon tumor cell lines. Carcinogenesis. 2004;25(7):1227–1236. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgh123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 447.Druesne N., Pagniez A., Mayeur C., Thomas M., Cherbuy C., Duée P.H., Martel P., Chaumontet C. Repetitive treatments of colon HT-29 cells with diallyl disulfide induce a prolonged hyperacetylation of histone H3 K14. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2004;1030:612–621. doi: 10.1196/annals.1329.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 448.Pajak B., Gajkowska B., Orzechowski A. Molecular basis of parthenolide-dependent proapoptotic activity in cancer cells. Folia Histochem. Cytobiol. 2008;46:129–135. doi: 10.2478/v10042-008-0019-2. [REMOVED HYPERLINK FIELD]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 449.Gopal Y.N., Arora T.S., Van Dyke M.W. Parthenolide specifically depletes histone deacetylase 1 protein and induces cell death through ataxia telangiectasia mutated. Chem. Biol. 2007;14:813–823. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2007.06.007. [REMOVED HYPERLINK FIELD]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 450.Gopal Y.N., Chanchorn E., Van Dyke M.W. Parthenolide promotes the ubiquitination of MDM2 and activates p53 cellular functions. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2009;8:552–562. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-0661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 451.Baud M.G., Leiser T., Haus P., Samlal S., Wong A.C., Wood R.J., Petrucci V., Gunaratnam M., Hughes S.M., Buluwela L., Turlais F., Neidle S., Meyer-Almes F.J., White A.J., Fuchter M.J. Defining the mechanism of action and enzymatic selectivity of psammaplin A against its epigenetic targets. J. Med. Chem. 2012;55(4):1731–1750. doi: 10.1021/jm2016182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 452.García J., Franci G., Pereira R., Benedetti R., Nebbioso A., Rodríguez-Barrios F., Gronemeyer H., Altucci L., de Lera A.R. Epigenetic profiling of the antitumor natural compound psammaplin A and its analogues. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2011;19(12):3637–3649. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2010.12.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 453.Baud M.G., Leiser T., Petrucci V., Gunaratnam M., Neidle S., Meyer-Almes F.J., Fuchter M.J. Thioester derivatives of the natural compound psammaplin A as potent histone deacetylase inhibitors. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2013;9:81–88. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.9.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 454.Kim D.H., Shin J., Kwon H.J. Psammaplin A is a natural prodrug that inhibits class I histone deacetylase. Exp. Mol. Med. 2007;39(1):47–55. doi: 10.1038/emm.2007.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 455.Kim T.H., Kim H.S., Kang Y.J., Yoon S., Lee J., Choi W.S., Jung J.H., Kim H.S. Psammaplin A induces Sirtuin 1-dependent autophagic cell death in doxorubicin-resistant MCF-7/adr human breast cancer cells and xenografts. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2015;1850(2):401–410. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2014.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 456.Sun Y., Jiang X., Chen S., Price B.D. Inhibition of histone acetyltransferase activity by anacardic acid sensitizes tumor cells to ionizing radiation. FEBS Lett. 2006;580:4353–4356. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.06.092. [REMOVED HYPERLINK FIELD]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 457.Du L., Risinger A.L., King J.B., Powell D.R., Cichewicz R.H. A potent HDAC inhibitor, 1-alaninechlamydocin, from a Tolypocladium sp. induces G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in MIA PaCa-2 cells. J. Nat. Prod. 2014;77(7):1753–1757. doi: 10.1021/np500387h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 458.Zhao F., Chen Y., Li R., Liu Y., Wen L., Zhang C. Triptolide alters histone H3K9 and H3K27 methylation state and induces G0/G1 arrest and caspase-dependent apoptosis in multiple myeloma in vitro. Toxicology. 2010;267(1-3):70–79. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2009.10.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 459.Wen L., Chen Y., Zeng L.L., Zhao F., Yi S., Yang L.J., Zhang B.P., Zhao J., Zhao Z.C., Zhang C. Triptolide induces cell apoptosis by targeting H3K4me3 and downstream effector proteins in KM3 multiple myeloma cells. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2015;17(2):147–160. doi: 10.2174/1389201016666150930115555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 460.Ganguly S., Home T., Yacoub A., Kambhampati S., Shi H., Dandawate P., Padhye S., Saluja A.K., McGuirk J., Rao R. Targeting HSF1 disrupts HSP90 chaperone function in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Oncotarget. 2015;6(31):31767–31779. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 461.Tamgue O., Chai C.S., Hao L., Zambe J.C., Huang W.W., Zhang B., Lei M., Wei Y.M. Triptolide inhibits histone methyltransferase EZH2 and modulates the expression of its target genes in prostate cancer cells. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2013;14(10):5663–5669. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.10.5663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 462.Wen L., Chen Y., Zeng L.L., Zhao F., Li R., Liu Y., Zhangm C. Triptolide induces cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis of human multiple myeloma cells in vitro via altering expression of histone demethylase LSD1 and JMJD2B. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2012;33(1):109–119. doi: 10.1038/aps.2011.145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 463.Park B., Sung B., Yadav V.R., Chaturvedi M.M., Aggarwal B.B. Triptolide, histone acetyltransferase inhibitor, suppresses growth and chemosensitizes leukemic cells through inhibition of gene expression regulated by TNF-TNFR1-TRADD-TRAF2-NIK-TAK1-IKK pathway. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2011;82(9):1134–1144. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2011.07.062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 464.Hatfield D.L., Yoo M.H., Carlson B.A., Gladyshev V.N. Selenoproteins that function in cancer prevention and promotion. 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 465.Lee J.I., Nian H., Cooper A.J., Sinha R., Dai J., Bisson W.H., Dashwood R.H., Pinto J.T. Alpha-keto acid metabolites of naturally occurring organoselenium compounds as inhibitors of histone deacetylase in human prostate cancer cells. Cancer Prev. Res. (Phila.) 2009;2:683–693. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-09-0047. [REMOVED HYPERLINK FIELD]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 466.Nian H., Bisson W.H., Dashwood W.M., Pinto J.T., Dashwood R.H. Alpha-keto acid metabolites of organoselenium compounds inhibit histone deacetylase activity in human colon cancer cells. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30:1416–1423. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgp147. [REMOVED HYPERLINK FIELD]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 467.Goulet A.C., Watts G., Lord J.L., Nelson M.A. Profiling of selenomethionine responsive genes in colon cancer by microarray analysis. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2007;6:494–503. doi: 10.4161/cbt.6.4.3813. [REMOVED HYPERLINK FIELD]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 468.Senawong T., Misuna S., Khaopha S., Nuchadomrong S., Sawatsitang P., Phaosiri C., Surapaitoon A., Sripa B. Histone deacetylase (HDAC)-inhibitory and antiproliferative activities of phenolic-rich extracts derived from the rhizome of Hydnophytum formicarum Jack.: sinapinic acid acts as HDAC inhibitor. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2013;13:232. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-13-232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 469.Greiner D., Bonaldi T., Eskeland R., Roemer E., Imhof A. Identification of a specific inhibitor of the histone methyltransferase SU (VAR) 3-9. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2005;1(3):143–145. doi: 10.1038/nchembio721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 470.Paschall A.V., Yang D., Lu C., Choi J.H., Li X., Liu F., Figueroa M., Oberlies N.H., Pearce C., Bollag W.B., Nayak-Kapoor A., Liu K. H3K9 Trimethylation Silences Fas Expression To Confer Colon Carcinoma Immune Escape and 5-Fluorouracil Chemoresistance. J. Immunol. 2015 doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1402243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 471.Iorio M.V., Piovan C., Croce C.M. Interplay between microRNAs and the epigenetic machinery: an intricate network. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1799;2010:694–701. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2010.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 472.Bartel D.P. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;116:281–297. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00045-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 473.Paroo Z., Liu Q., Wang X. Biochemical mechanisms of the RNA-induced silencing complex. Cell Res. 2007;17:187–194. doi: 10.1038/sj.cr.7310148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 474.Pratt A.J., MacRae I.J. The RNA-induced silencing complex: a versatile gene-silencing machine. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:17897–17901. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R900012200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 475.Lee Y., Ahn C., Han J., Choi H., Kim J., Yim J., Lee J., Provost P., Radmark O., Kim S., Kim V.N. The nuclear RNase III Drosha initiates microRNA processing. Nature. 2003;425:415–419. doi: 10.1038/nature01957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 476.Pasquinelli A.E. MicroRNAs and their targets: recognition, regulation and an emerging reciprocal relationship. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012;13:271–282. doi: 10.1038/nrg3162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 477.Friedländer M.R., Lizano E., Houben A.J., Bezdan D., Báñez-Coronel M., Kudla G., Mateu-Huertas E., Kagerbauer B., González J., Chen K.C., LeProust E.M., Martí E., Estivill X. Evidence for the biogenesis of more than 1,000 novel human microRNAs. Genome Biol. 2014;15(4):R57. doi: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-4-r57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 478.Wiklund E.D., Kjems J., Clark S.J. Epigenetic architecture and miRNA: reciprocal regulators. Epigenomics. 2010;2:823–840. doi: 10.2217/epi.10.51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 479.Ratovitski E.A. Tumor Protein p63/microRNA Network in Epithelial Cancer Cells. Curr. Genomics. 2013;14(7):441–452. doi: 10.2174/13892029113146660011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 480.Ratovitski E.A. Phospho-ΔNp63α/microRNA network modulates epigenetic regulatory enzymes in squamous cell carcinomas. Cell Cycle. 2014;13(5):749–761. doi: 10.4161/cc.27676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 481.Esteller M. Non-coding RNAs in human disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011;12:861–874. doi: 10.1038/nrg3074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 482.Lovat F., Valeri N., Croce C.M. MicroRNAs in the pathogenesis of cancer. Semin. Oncol. 2011;38:724–733. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2011.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 483.Suzuki K., Kelleher A.D. Transcriptional regulation by promoter targeted RNAs. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2009;9:1079–1087. doi: 10.2174/156802609789630875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 484.Giles K.E., Ghirlando R., Felsenfeld G. Maintenance of a constitutive heterochromatin domain in vertebrates by a Dicer-dependent mechanism. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010;12:94–99. doi: 10.1038/ncb2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 485.Younger S.T., Corey D.R. Transcriptional regulation by miRNA mimics that target sequences downstream of gene termini. Mol. Biosyst. 2011;7:2383–2388. doi: 10.1039/c1mb05090g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 486.Parasramka M.A., Ho E., Williams D.E., Dashwood R.H. MicroRNAs, diet, and cancer: new mechanistic insights on the epigenetic actions of phytochemicals. Mol. Carcinog. 2012;51(3):213–230. doi: 10.1002/mc.20822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 487.Sethi S., Li Y., Sarkar F.H. Regulating miRNA by natural agents as a new strategy for cancer treatment. Curr. Drug Targets. 2013;14(10):1167–1174. doi: 10.2174/13894501113149990189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 488.Milenkovic D., Jude B., Morand C. miRNA as molecular target of polyphenols underlying their biological effects. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2013;64:40–51. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.05.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 489.Wang Y., Li Y., Liu X., Cho W.C. Genetic and epigenetic studies for determining molecular targets of natural compound anticancer agents. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets. 2013;13(5):506–518. doi: 10.2174/15680096113139990033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 490.Sun M., Estrov Z., Ji Y., Coombes K.R., Harris D.H., Kurzrock R. Curcumin (diferuloylmethane) alters the expression profiles of microRNAs in human pancreatic cancer cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2008;7(3):464–473. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-07-2272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 491.Zhang J., Zhang T., Ti X., Shi J., Wu C., Ren X., Yin H. Curcumin promotes apoptosis in A549/DDP multidrug-resistant human lung adenocarcinoma cells through a miRNA signaling pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010;399(1):1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 492.Yang J., Cao Y., Sun J., Zhang Y. Curcumin reduces the expression of Bcl-2 by upregulating miR-15a and miR-16 in MCF-7 cells. Med. Oncol. 2010;27(4):1114–1118. doi: 10.1007/s12032-009-9344-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 493.Mudduluru G., George-William J.N., Muppala S., Asangani I.A., Kumarswamy R., Nelson L.D., Allgayer H. Curcumin regulates miR-21 expression and inhibits invasion and metastasis in colorectal cancer. Biosci. Rep. 2011;31(3):185–197. doi: 10.1042/BSR20100065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 494.Subramaniam D., Ponnurangam S., Ramamoorthy P., Standing D., Battafarano R.J., Anant S., Sharma P. Curcumin induces cell death in esophageal cancer cells through modulating Notch signaling. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 495.Guo H., Xu Y., Fu Q. Curcumin inhibits growth of prostate carcinoma via miR-208-mediated CDKN1A activation. Tumour Biol. 2015 doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-3592-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 496.Toden S., Okugawa Y., Buhrmann C., Nattamai D., Anguiano E., Baldwin N., Shakibaei M., Boland C.R., Goel A. Novel Evidence for Curcumin and Boswellic Acid-Induced Chemoprevention through Regulation of miR-34a and miR-27a in Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Prev. Res. (Phila.) 2015;8(5):431–443. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-14-0354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 497.Ye M., Zhang J., Zhang J., Miao Q., Yao L., Zhang J. Curcumin promotes apoptosis by activating the p53-miR-192-5p/215-XIAP pathway in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Lett. 2015;357(1):196–205. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.11.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 498.Zhao S.F., Zhang X., Zhang X.J., Shi X.Q., Yu Z.J., Kan Q.C. Induction of microRNA-9 mediates cytotoxicity of curcumin against SKOV3 ovarian cancer cells. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2014;15(8):3363–3368. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.8.3363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 499.Li X., Xie W., Xie C., Huang C., Zhu J., Liang Z., Deng F., Zhu M., Zhu W., Wu R., Wu J., Geng S., Zhong C. Curcumin modulates miR-19/PTEN/AKT/p53 axis to suppress bisphenol A-induced MCF-7 breast cancer cell proliferation. Phytother. Res. 2014;28(10):1553–1560. doi: 10.1002/ptr.5167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 500.Kronski E., Fiori M.E., Barbieri O., Astigiano S., Mirisola V., Killian P.H., Bruno A., Pagani A., Rovera F., Pfeffer U., Sommerhoff C.P., Noonan D.M., Nerlich A.G., Fontana L., Bachmeier B.E. MiR181b is induced by the chemopreventive polyphenol curcumin and inhibits breast cancer metastasis via down-regulation of the inflammatory cytokines CXCL1 and -2. Mol. Oncol. 2014;8(3):581–595. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2014.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 501.Tili E., Michaille J.J., Alder H., Volinia S., Delmas D., Latruffe N., Croce C.M. Resveratrol modulates the levels of microRNAs targeting genes encoding tumor-suppressors and effectors of TGFβ signaling pathway in SW480 cells. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2010;80(12):2057–2065. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2010.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 502.Wang G., Dai F., Yu K., Jia Z., Zhang A., Huang Q., Kang C., Jiang H., Pu P. Resveratrol inhibits glioma cell growth via targeting oncogenic microRNAs and multiple signaling pathways. Int. J. Oncol. 2015;46(4):1739–1747. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2015.2863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 503.Li H., Jia Z., Li A., Jenkins G., Yang X., Hu J., Guo W. Resveratrol repressed viability of U251 cells by miR-21 inhibiting of NF-κB pathway. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2013;382(1-2):137–143. doi: 10.1007/s11010-013-1728-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 504.Yang S.F., Lee W.J., Tan P., Tang C.H., Hsiao M., Hsieh F.K., Chien M.H. Upregulation of miR-328 and inhibition of CREB-DNA-binding activity are critical for resveratrol-mediated suppression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and subsequent metastatic ability in human osteosarcomas. Oncotarget. 2015;6(5):2736–2753. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 505.Zhou C., Ding J., Wu Y. Resveratrol induces apoptosis of bladder cancer cells via miR-21 regulation of the Akt/Bcl-2 signaling pathway. Mol. Med. Rep. 2014;9(4):1467–1473. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2014.1950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 506.Liu P., Liang H., Xia Q., Li P., Kong H., Lei P., Wang S., Tu Z. Resveratrol induces apoptosis of pancreatic cancers cells by inhibiting miR-21 regulation of BCL-2 expression. Clin. Transl. Oncol. 2013;15(9):741–746. doi: 10.1007/s12094-012-0999-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 507.Sheth S., Jajoo S., Kaur T., Mukherjea D., Sheehan K., Rybak L.P., Ramkumar V. Resveratrol reduces prostate cancer growth and metastasis by inhibiting the Akt/ microRNA-21 pathway. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51655. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 508.Dhar S., Hicks C., Levenson A.S. Resveratrol and prostate cancer: promising role for microRNAs. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2011;55(8):1219–1229. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201100141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 509.Dhar S., Kumar A., Rimando A.M., Zhang X., Levenson A.S. Resveratrol and pterostilbene epigenetically restore PTEN expression by targeting oncomiRs of the miR-17 family in prostate cancer. Oncotarget. 2015;6(29):27214–27226. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 510.Altamemi I. Murphy. E.A.; Catroppo, J.F.; Zumbrun, E.E.; Zhang, J.; McClellan, J.L.; Singh, U.P.; Nagarkatti, P.S.; Nagarkatti, M. Role of microRNAs in resveratrol-mediated mitigation of colitis-associated tumorigenesis in Apc (Min/+) mice. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2014;350(1):99–109. doi: 10.1124/jpet.114.213306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 511.Del Follo-Martinez A., Banerjee N., Li X., Safe S., Mertens-Talcott S. Resveratrol and quercetin in combination have anticancer activity in colon cancer cells and repress oncogenic microRNA-27a. Nutr. Cancer. 2013;65(3):494–504. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2012.725194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 512.Zhang H., Jia R., Wang C., Hu T., Wang F. Piceatannol promotes apoptosis via up-regulation of microRNA-129 expression in colorectal cancer cell lines. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014;452(3):775–781. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.08.150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 513.Kumazaki M., Noguchi S., Yasui Y., Iwasaki J., Shinohara H., Yamada N., Akao Y. Anti-cancer effects of naturally occurring compounds through modulation of signal transduction and miRNA expression in human colon cancer cells. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2013;24(11):1849–1858. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2013.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 514.Tsang W.P., Kwok T.T. Epigallocatechin gallate up-regulation of miR-16 and induction of apoptosis in human cancer cells. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2010;21(2):140–146. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2008.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 515.Zhou H., Chen J.X., Yang C.S., Yang M.Q., Deng Y., Wang H. Gene regulation mediated by microRNAs in response to green tea polyphenol EGCG in mouse lung cancer. BMC Genomics. 2014;15(Suppl. 11):S3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-S11-S3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 516.Wang H., Bian S., Yang C.S. Green tea polyphenol EGCG suppresses lung cancer cell growth through upregulating miR-210 expression caused by stabilizing HIF-1α. Carcinogenesis. 2011;32(12):1881–1889. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgr218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 517.Gordon M.W., Yan F., Zhong X., Mazumder P.B., Xu-Monette Z.Y., Zou D., Young K.H., Ramos K.S., Li Y. Regulation of p53-targeting microRNAs by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Implications in the etiology of multiple myeloma. Mol. Carcinog. 2014 doi: 10.1002/mc.22175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 518.Fix L.N., Shah M., Efferth T., Farwell M.A., Zhang B. MicroRNA expression profile of MCF-7 human breast cancer cells and the effect of green tea polyphenon-60. Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2010;7(5):261–277. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 519.Zhou D.H., Wang X., Feng Q. EGCG enhances the efficacy of cisplatin by downregulating hsa-miR-98-5p in NSCLC A549 cells. Nutr. Cancer. 2014;66(4):636–644. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2014.894101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 520.Chakrabarti M., Khandkar M., Banik N.L., Ray S.K. Alterations in expression of specific microRNAs by combination of 4-HPR and EGCG inhibited growth of human malignant neuroblastoma cells. Brain Res. 2012;1454:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.03.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 521.Majid S., Dar A.A., Saini S., Chen Y., Shahryari V., Liu J., Zaman M.S., Hirata H., Yamamura S., Ueno K., Tanaka Y., Dahiya R. Regulation of minichromosome maintenance gene family by microRNA-1296 and genistein in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2010;70(7):2809–2818. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-4176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 522.Chen Y., Zaman M.S., Deng G., Majid S., Saini S., Liu J., Tanaka Y., Dahiya R. MicroRNAs 221/222 and genistein-mediated regulation of ARHI tumor suppressor gene in prostate cancer. Cancer Prev. Res. (Phila.) 2011;4(1):76–86. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-10-0167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 523.Chiyomaru T., Yamamura S., Zaman M.S., Majid S., Deng G., Shahryari V., Saini S., Hirata H., Ueno K., Chang I., Tanaka Y., Tabatabai Z.L., Enokida H., Nakagawa M., Dahiya R. Genistein suppresses prostate cancer growth through inhibition of oncogenic microRNA-151. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 524.Hirata H., Ueno K., Nakajima K., Tabatabai Z.L., Hinoda Y., Ishii N., Dahiya R. Genistein downregulates onco-miR-1260b and inhibits Wnt-signalling in renal cancer cells. Br. J. Cancer. 2013;108(10):2070–2078. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 525.Hirata H., Hinoda Y., Shahryari V., Deng G., Tanaka Y., Tabatabai Z.L., Dahiya R. Genistein downregulates onco-miR-1260b and upregulates sFRP1 and Smad4 via demethylation and histone modification in prostate cancer cells. Br. J. Cancer. 2014;110(6):1645–1654. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 526.Ma J., Cheng L., Liu H., Zhang J., Shi Y., Zeng F., Miele L., Sarkar F.H., Xia J., Wang Z. Genistein down-regulates miR-223 expression in pancreatic cancer cells. Curr. Drug Targets. 2013;14(10):1150–1156. doi: 10.2174/13894501113149990187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 527.Chiyomaru T., Yamamura S., Fukuhara S., Hidaka H., Majid S., Saini S., Arora S., Deng G., Shahryari V., Chang I., Tanaka Y., Tabatabai Z.L., Enokida H., Seki N., Nakagawa M., Dahiya R. Genistein up-regulates tumor suppressor microRNA-574-3p in prostate cancer. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 528.Xu L., Xiang J., Shen J., Zou X., Zhai S., Yin Y., Li P., Wang X., Sun Q. Oncogenic microRNA-27a is a target for genistein in ovarian cancer cells. Anticancer. Agents Med. Chem. 2013;13(7):1126–1132. doi: 10.2174/18715206113139990006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 529.Xia J., Cheng L., Mei C., Ma J., Shi Y., Zeng F., Wang Z., Wang Z. Genistein inhibits cell growth and invasion through regulation of miR-27a in pancreatic cancer cells. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2014;20(33):5348–5353. doi: 10.2174/1381612820666140128215756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 530.Sun Q., Cong R., Yan H., Gu H., Zeng Y., Liu N., Chen J., Wang B. Genistein inhibits growth of human uveal melanoma cells and affects microRNA-27a and target gene expression. Oncol. Rep. 2009;22(3):563–567. doi: 10.3892/or_00000472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 531.Zaman M.S., Thamminana S., Shahryari V., Chiyomaru T., Deng G., Saini S., Majid S., Fukuhara S., Chang I., Arora S., Hirata H., Ueno K., Singh K., Tanaka Y., Dahiya R. Inhibition of PTEN gene expression by oncogenic miR-23b-3p in renal cancer. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 532.Sonoki H., Sato T., Endo S., Matsunaga T., Yamaguchi M., Yamazaki Y., Sugatani J., Ikari A. Quercetin Decreases Claudin-2 Expression Mediated by Up-Regulation of microRNA miR-16 in Lung Adenocarcinoma A549 Cells. Nutrients. 2015;7(6):4578–4592. doi: 10.3390/nu7064578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 533.Lou G., Liu Y., Wu S., Xue J., Yang F., Fu H., Zheng M., Chen Z. The p53/miR-34a/SIRT1 Positive Feedback Loop in Quercetin-Induced Apoptosis. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2015;35(6):2192–2202. doi: 10.1159/000374024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 534.Zhang X., Guo Q., Chen J., Chen Z. Quercetin Enhances Cisplatin Sensitivity of Human Osteosarcoma Cells by Modulating microRNA-217-KRAS Axis. Mol. Cells. 2015;38(7):638–642. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2015.0037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 535.MacKenzie T.N., Mujumdar N., Banerjee S., Sangwan V., Sarver A., Vickers S., Subramanian S., Saluja A.K. Triptolide induces the expression of miR-142-3p: a negative regulator of heat shock protein 70 and pancreatic cancer cell proliferation. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2013;12(7):1266–1275. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-12-1231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 536.Jacobson B.A., Chen E.Z., Tang S., Belgum H.S., McCauley J.A., Evenson K.A., Etchison R.G., Jay-Dixon J., Patel M.R., Raza A., Saluja A.K., D'Cunha J., Kratzke R.A. Triptolide and its prodrug minnelide suppress Hsp70 and inhibit in vivo growth in a xenograft model of mesothelioma. Genes Cancer. 2015;6(3-4):144–152. doi: 10.18632/genesandcancer.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 537.Rousalova I., Banerjee S., Sangwan V., Evenson K., McCauley J.A., Kratzke R., Vickers S.M., Saluja A., D'Cunha J. Minnelide: a novel therapeutic that promotes apoptosis in non-small cell lung carcinoma in vivo. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e77411. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 538.Heber D. Multi-targeted therapy of cancer by ellagitannins. Cancer Lett. 2008;269(2):262–268. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.03.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 539.Wen X.Y., Wu S.Y., Li Z.Q., Liu Z.Q., Zhang J.J., Wang G.F., Jiang Z.H., Wu S.G. Ellagitannin (BJA3121), an anti-proliferative natural polyphenol compound, can regulate the expression of miRNAs in HepG2 cancer cells. Phytother. Res. 2009;23(6):778–784. doi: 10.1002/ptr.2616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 540.Tunca B., Tezcan G., Cecener G., Egeli U., Ak S., Malyer H., Tumen G., Bilir A. Olea europaea leaf extract alters microRNA expression in human glioblastoma cells. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2012;138(11):1831–1844. doi: 10.1007/s00432-012-1261-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 541.Avtanski D.B., Nagalingam A., Kuppusamy P., Bonner M.Y., Arbiser J.L., Saxena N.K., Sharma D. Honokiol abrogates leptin-induced tumor progression by inhibiting Wnt1-MTA1-β-catenin signaling axis in a microRNA-34a dependent manner. Oncotarget. 2015;6(18):16396–16410. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 542.Kong D., Heath E., Chen W., Cher M.L., Powell I., Heilbrun L., Li Y., Ali S., Sethi S., Hassan O., Hwang C., Gupta N., Chitale D., Sakr W.A., Menon M., Sarkar F.H. Loss of let-7 up-regulates EZH2 in prostate cancer consistent with the acquisition of cancer stem cell signatures that are attenuated by BR-DIM. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33729. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 543.Li Y., VandenBoom T.G., II, Kong D., Wang Z., Ali S., Philip P.A., Sarkar F.H. Up-regulation of miR-200 and let-7 by natural agents leads to the reversal of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2009;69(16):6704–6712. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 544.Li Y., VandenBoom T.G., II, Wang Z., Kong D., Ali S., Philip P.A., Sarkar F.H. Up-regulation of miR-146a contributes to the inhibition of invasion of pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2010;70(8) Suppl.:5703. doi: 10.1158/1538-7445.AM10-5703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 545.Bhanot A., Sharma R., Noolvi M.N. Natural sources as potential anti-cancer agents: A review. Inter. J. Phytomed. 2011;3:9–26. [Google Scholar]
  • 546.Cragg G.M., Newman D.J. Natural compounds: a continuing source of novel drug leads. 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 547.Bailón-Moscoso N., Romero-Benavides J.C., Ostrosky-Wegman P. Development of anticancer drugs based on the hallmarks of cancer cells. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:3981–3995. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-1649-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 548.Pratheeshkumar P., Sreekala C., Zhang Z., Budhraja A., Ding S., Son Y.O., Wang X., Hitron A., Hyun-Jung K., Wang L., Lee J.C., Shi X. Cancer prevention with promising natural compounds: mechanisms of action and molecular targets. Anticancer. Agents Med. Chem. 2012;12:1159–1184. doi: 10.2174/187152012803833035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 549.Lee W.L., Huang J.Y., Shyur L.F. 2013. Phytoagents for cancer management:regulation of nucleic acid oxidation, ROS, and relatedmechanisms. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev.,2013, 925804.
  • 550.Yu X.D., Guo Z.S. Epigenetic drugs for cancer treatment and prevention: mechanisms of action. Biomol. Concepts. 2010;1(3-4):239–251. doi: 10.1515/bmc.2010.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Current Genomics are provided here courtesy of Bentham Science Publishers

RESOURCES