Abstract
Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is one of the most frequent complications associated with type I and II diabetes mellitus. Kidneys from patients with DN are characterized by mesangial matrix expansion and increased thickness of the glomerular basement membrane, which are induced by reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Previous studies have been conducted to investigate this; however, the detailed mechanism of DN progression remains to be elucidated. The present study evaluated the expression of antisense mitochondrial non-coding RNA-2 (ASncmtRNA-2) in an experimental DN model and cultured human mesangial cells. When mice that exhibited genetic type II diabetes developed DN, ASncmtRNA-2 expression was significantly increased (P=0.017) and was positively correlated with pro-fibrotic factor transforming growth factor β1 (TGFβ1) expression and its downstream gene, fibronectin. Inhibition of ROS through administration of the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, NG-nitro-L-Arginine methylester (L-NAME), significantly reduced (P=0.022) the upregulation of ASncmtRNA-2 in DN. In cultured human renal mesangial cells (HRMCs), ASncmtRNA-2 was upregulated by high glucose stimuli in a time-dependent manner. Glucose-induced upregulation of ASncmtRNA-2 was also reduced by co-incubation of HRMCs with L-NAME. Notably, specific short hairpin RNA against ASncmtRNA-2 significantly downregulated the expression of TGFβ1 in HRMCs. The present study suggests that ASncmtRNA-2 is upregulated by ROS and may promote glomerular fibrosis in DN via positively regulating the expression of pro-fibrotic factors. These findings may provide novel potential therapeutic and preventative treatments for DN.
Keywords: antisense mitochondrial noncoding RNA2, diabetic nephropathy, oxidative stress, NL-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester, high glucose
Introduction
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the most prevalent metabolic disorders worldwide, particularly in western countries. Over the past few decades, incidence rates of DM have markedly increased due to unhealthy diet, lack of exercise and a deteriorating environment (1,2). DM may lead to complications such as diabetic nephropathy (DN), which is the leading cause of end stage renal disease in the USA (3). Diabetic kidneys are characterized by the development of albuminuria, enhanced glomerular filtration and pressure inside the glomerulus (4,5). Of all patients with type I and II DM, ~1/3 are affected by DN in their daily life (4). As DN progresses, excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) are generated, inducing irreversible renal damage due to continuous hyperglycemic conditions (6,7). Various enzymatic signaling pathways that generate ROS, such as nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and xanthine oxidase (XO) are stimulated in DN (8). However, the specific mechanism by which ROS regulates DN remains unclear.
A large proportion of regulatory RNAs are long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), which typically contain >200 nucleotides and serve important roles in the cytoplasm and nucleus (9). LncRNAs have been studied extensively in recent years, leading to the discovery of their important roles in tumorigenesis (9,10), RNA transcription (11) and mRNA translation (12,13). Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that lncRNAs are associated with DM progression (14). For example, lncRNA H19 is reportedly associated with the gestational DM-induced transformation of islet structure and function (14) and expression of the colorectal neoplasia differentially expressed lncRNA is affected by insulin and insulin-like growth factor signaling pathways in DM (15,16).
Although it has recently been revealed that lncRNAs are associated with the progression of DM (17), no lncRNA of mitochondrial origin has been identified that is associated with DM or its complications. It is well-documented that mitochondria maintain ROS levels; high levels of ROS induce dysfunction of mitochondria, which in turn produce ROS at a higher rate (18). Due to the central roles of mitochondria in ROS production and ROS-mediated oxidative stress, it was hypothesized that lncRNAs transcribed from the mitochondrial genome may serve important roles in oxidative stress-mediated disease progression, such as DN.
Antisense mitochondrial non-coding RNA-2 (ASncmtRNA-2; 2,104 nt) is a mitochondrial lncRNA that is expressed in the mitochondria and exported to the nucleus (19–21). Previous studies have revealed that it is involved in the tumorigenesis and mitochondrial retrograde signaling pathways (19–21). Notably, it has recently been demonstrated that ASncmtRNA-2 is overexpressed during aging and replicative senescence in human endothelial cells (18). This novel study indicated that ASncmtRNA-2 potentially serves a role in physiological oxidative stress. However, it remains unclear whether ASncmtRNA-2 is associated with pathological oxidative stress, such as the conditions observed in DN.
The present study aimed to investigate the role of ASncmtRNA-2 in oxidative stress-mediated DN fibrosis. Expression of ASncmtRNA-2 under ROS stimuli was assessed in an experimental model of DN and in cultured mesangial cells, and the possible mechanism through which ASncmtRNA-2 functions in DN was investigated.
Materials and methods
Experimental DN mouse model
A total of 16 four-week-old male C57BLKS/J mice weighing 15–18 g were purchased from the Model Animal Research Center of Nanjing University (Nanjing, China) and used as a control group. A total of 32 four-week old male C57BLKS/J-Lepr−/− (db/db) mice (weights, 30–32 g, Model Animal Research Center of Nanjing University), which genetically develop DM shortly following birth, were randomly divided into two groups: A DN group and a DN+NG-nitro-L-Arginine methylester (L-NAME) group (n=16 each). L-NAME, which is an NOS inhibitor that also inhibits ROS, was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Dallas, TX, USA). All mice were housed at 22°C, 45% humidity and a 12-h light/dark cycle. Mice had ad libitum access to water and food. The drinking water supply for the mice from the DN+L-NAME group contained L-NAME (90 mg/kg) throughout the experiment (22). In each group, RNA from the kidneys was harvested at weeks eight and 16 from three randomly selected mice. Remaining mice were sacrificed with 1.5% Pelltobarbitalum Natricum (0.1 ml/20 g; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) at week 24 and blood was harvested for biochemical analysis. Urine samples were collected at the same time and the urine albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) was assessed. The present study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Hebei Medical University (Shijiazhuang, China).
Hematoxylin and eosin, periodic acid-Schiff and trichrome Masson staining
Tissue samples were fixed in 10% buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin and spliced into 5-µm sections. Afterwards, hematoxylin and eosin staining, periodic acid-Schiff staining, as well as Trichrome Masson staining were performed as described before (23).
Cell culture
Human mesangial cells (HRMCs) were purchased from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA) and cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Cells were seeded in a six-well plate and transfected with specific short hairpin RNA (shRNA) to silence ASncmtRNA-2 (Sigma-Aldrich) using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Culture medium was replenished 6 h post-transfection. Cells were incubated at 37°C for 24 h and harvested for subsequent analysis. Due to the lack of commercial primary antibody against ASncmtRNA-2, only mRNA levels were detected throughout the study.
RNA isolation and reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)
RNA from mouse tissues and cultured cells were isolated using TRIzol reagent (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Dalian, China) and incubated at 37°C with DNase I (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturers' protocols. A total of 1 µg RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA with a volume of 20 µl (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) and qPCR was subsequently performed using an ABI PRISM 7900 system with a SYBR Premix Ex Taq Perfect Real-Time kit (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd.). Briefly, PCR was performed as follows: Initial denaturation at 95°C for 2 min, 35 cycles at 95°C for 30 sec and at 55°C for 60 sec. Fluorescence was recorded following each cycle using the ABI7900 (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). GAPDH was included as an internal reference gene. Primers for corresponding genes are listed in Table I. Each assay was performed in triplicate unless otherwise stated. The gene expression was normalized to GAPDH with the delta delta Ct method as explained in details in previous article (24).
Table I.
Genes | Primer sequence |
---|---|
hASncmtRNA-2 | Forward: 5′-ACCGTGCAAAGGTAGCATAATCACT-3′ |
Reverse: 5′-CCGTAAATGATATCATCTCAACT-3′ | |
hTGFβ1 | Forward: 5′-TGCACATTGCCTGTTCTGCT-3′ |
Reverse: 5′-TGCATCTTGGTTGGCTGCAT-3′ | |
hFN | Forward: 5′-TGCACATTGCCTGTTCTGCT-3′ |
Reverse: 5′-TGCATCTTGGTTGGCTGCAT-3′ | |
hGAPDH | Forward: 5′-CTGACTTCAACAGCGACACC-3′ |
Reverse: 5′-TGCTGTAGCCAAATTCGTTGT-3′ | |
mASncmtRNA-2 | Forward: 5′-GCTAAACGAGGGTCCAACTG-3′ |
Reverse: 5′-CTAACCTAGAGAAGGTTATTAGGTTT-3′ | |
mTGFβ1 | Forward: 5′-TAAAGAGGTCACCCGCGTGCTAAT-3′ |
Reverse: 5′-ACTGCTTCCCGAATGTCTGACGTA-3′ | |
mFN | Forward: 5′-ACGGTTCCCATTACGCCAT-3′ |
Reverse: 5′-TCATCCGCTGGCCATTTTCT-3′ | |
mGAPDH | Forward: 5′-AGGTCGGTGTGAACGGATTTG-3′ |
Reverse: 5′-TGTAGACCATGTAGTTGAGGTCA-3′ |
h, human; m, mouse; ASncmtRNA-2, antisense mitochondrial non-coding RNA-2; TGFβ1, transforming growth factor β1; FN, fibronectin.
Measurement of intracellular ROS
To detect the effects of L-NAME and high glucose on ROS production, the intracellular ROS level was evaluatedusinganon-fluorescent probe, 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Nanjing, China). Briefly, HRMCs were seeded in a 96-well plate (1×105 cells/well) and cultured with low (LG) or high glucose (HG), with each medium supplemented with or without L-NAME. Culture medium was removed and plates were washed with PBS three times at 24 h following culture. DCFH-DA was diluted with DCFH/F12 to a final concentration of 10 µM and co-incubated with HRMCs at 37°C for 20 min. Fluorescence was measured using a Tecan fluorescence plate reader (Tecan Group, Ltd., Männedorf, Switzerland) at 485 nm for excitation and 530 nm for emission. Each measurement was performed in triplicate and repeated at least three times.
Statistical analysis
Data were presented as the mean ± standard deviation and analyzed using a Student's t-test. Statistical analyses were performed using Excel software (Microsoft, Inc., Richmond, WA, USA). Results were obtained from three independent experiments and P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Establishment of experimental DN model
To assess the expression of ASncmtRNA-2 in DN samples and ROS-reduced diabetic kidney samples, a mouse model of DN was established. L-NAME is anNOS inhibitor that is able to reduce the production of ROS in diabetic kidneys (25), hence administering diabetic mice with L-NAME is an effective method to evaluate the effects of reduced ROS on the expression of ASncmtRNA-2 in diabetic kidneys. At week 24, blood samples were harvested from each group to analyze physical and biochemical parameters (Table II), including glucose, glycated hemoglobin, total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoproteins and low-density lipoproteins. The differences observed in these parameters between groups demonstrated that mice from the DN group were suffering from a metabolic disorder whereas those in the control group were not and that administration of L-NAME was able to relieve these disorders. These findings suggest that mice with genetically developed DM developed DN at week 24, and L-NAME effectively ameliorated ROS-mediated renal damage in the experimental DN model. Mice were sacrificed by the end of week 24 and their kidneys were harvested. Half of each kidney was formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded for histological analysis whereas the other half was frozen to allow for isolation of tissue RNA.
Table II.
Parameters | Control | DN | DN + L-NAME |
---|---|---|---|
Number | 10 | 9a | 10 |
Body weight (g) | 22.09±2.05 | 41.93±1.32 | 47.97±0.87 |
Kidney/body weight ratio (%) | 0.45±0.12 | 0.39±0.28 | 0.31±0.31 |
Glucose (mmol/l) | 6.72±0.01 | 23.80±0.01 | 14.41±0.009 |
HbA1c (%) | 5.3±0.09 | 9.8±0.34 | 7.6±0.12 |
HbA1c (mmol/mol) | 34.426±0.98 | 83.607±3.76 | 59.563±1.31 |
Total cholesterol (mmol/l) | 4.9±0.17 | 11.8±1.01 | 9.4±0.97 |
Triglycerides (mmol/l) | 1.5±0.24 | 3.7±0.33 | 2.6±0.42 |
HDL (mmol/l) | 1.3±0.32 | 2.7±0.11 | 1.7±0.21 |
LDL (mmol/l) | 4.5±0.56 | 10.3±0.31 | 7.4±0.11 |
Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation.
One mouse from this group succumbed at the 22nd week. DN, diabetic nephropathy; L-NAME, NG-nitro-L-Arginine methylester; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; HDL, high density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein.
Urine samples were collected at weeks 8, 16 and 24 to assess renal function. As illustrated in Fig. 1A, there was no significant difference in UACR over time for control mice. A significant progressive increase in UACR was observed in DN mice over time compared with the control group (P<0.05). In the DN+L-NAME group, UACR was also significantly increased compared with the control group (P<0.05); however, the UCAR levels in this group were markedly lower than the paired mice from the DN group, irrespective of time. As demonstrated in Fig. 1B, mice from the DN group exhibited more severe glomerular lesions as compared with control mice. In particular, the cellular architecture in the glomeruli was less revealed and the extracellular matrix architecture was notably damaged in this group; furthermore, increased matrix deposition, glycogen accumulation and collagen production were observed via hematoxylin and eosin, periodic acid-Schiff and trichrome Masson staining, respectively. By contrast, tissue from mice with DN that were administered L-NAME exhibited reduced renal damage compared with the DN group, with less damaged cell architecture and matrix deposition. These data indicate the successful establishment of an experimental DN model from a genetically DM-developed mouse strain, and suggest that administering the L-NAME ROS-inhibitor effectively ameliorated renal damage.
Expression of ASncmtRNA-2 is upregulated in mice with DN and decreased by L-NAME
Three mice from each group were randomly chosen and sacrificed at weeks 8, 16 and 24 to assess the expression levels of ASncmtRNA-2. Data from RT-qPCR revealed that the mRNA expression level of ASncmtRNA-2 in the DN group was significantly increased (2.6-fold) compared with control mice at week 16, and 3.8-fold at week 24 (both P<0.05). Furthermore, the mRNA expression levels of ASncmtRNA-2 in the DN+L-NAME group were significantly higher (P<0.05) than the control group and markedly lower than the DN group at weeks 16 and 24 (Fig. 2A). These results indicate that ASncmtRNA-2 increased throughout the development of DN and that inhibition of ROS by L-NAME may reduce the upregulation of ASncmtRNA-2 in DN. Transforming growth factor β1 (TGFβ1) and its downstream gene, fibronectin (FN), are well-known pro-fibrotic factors in DN (26). To investigate whether the expression of ASncmtRNA-2 is associated with these pro-fibrotic factors, mRNA levels of TGFβ1 and FN were detected in mouse kidneys using RT-qPCR analysis. As demonstrated in Fig. 2B, the mRNA levels of TGFβ1 and FN were significantly upregulated in the DN group compared with the control group, (P<0.05) which were markedly decreased following treatment with L-NAME (DN vs. DN+L-NAME). Compared with the control group, mRNA levels of TGFβ1 and FN were significantly upregulated in the DN+L-NAME group (P<0.05). These findings suggest that there may be an association between TGFβ1 and ASncmtRNA-2 levels. The expression of ASncmtRNA-2 was compared with that of TGFβ1 in mice with DN sacrificed at week 24 (n=9), which indicated that they were positively correlated, with a coefficient of determination (r2) as0.8716 (Fig. 2C). These results suggest that ASncmtRNA-2 is significantly overexpressed in DN and positively correlated with expression of pro-fibrotic factor TGFβ1.
ASncmtRNA-2 is upregluated in cultured HRMCs treated with HG
Based on the experimental observations thus far, the expression levels of ASncmtRNA-2 in cultured HRMCs were studied. Cells were seeded into six-well plates and cultured with LG or HGmedium, with or without additional L-NAME treatment. mRNA levels of ASncmtRNA-2 were measured at different time intervals. At 8 h post-treatment, expression of ASncmtRNA-2 remained unchanged in all groups, as compared with 0 h. However, the level of ASncmtRNA-2 mRNA increased significantly in HG and HG+L-NAME-treated cells compared with LG-treated cells from 16 h onwards (P<0.05). Although a significant increase was also observed in the ASncmtRNA-2mRNA level in the HG+L-NAME group vs. the control group, this was markedly reduced compared with the HG group (Fig. 3A). Relative ROS levels in HRMCs were detected with the non-fluorescent probe DCFH-DA. DCFH reacts with cellular ROS to generate the fluorescent product DCF, which can be easily traced within cells. Therefore, intracellular ROS levels were determined using a DCFH-DC probe as described previously (27). As shown in Fig. 3B, ROS fluorescence was significantly upregulated in HG-treated cells (P<0.05), but was suppressed by 37.5% when HG cells were co-incubated with L-NAME, suggesting that L-NAME effectively inhibits ROS production. Levels of ASncmtRNA-2mRNA, TGFβ1 and FN also displayed similar expression patterns (Fig. 3C). These data suggest that ASncmtRNA-2 is also overexpressed in mesangial cells exposed to HG, which is the in vivo environment of patients with DM. Under HG stimuli, expression of ASncmtRNA-2 is positively associated with that of TGFβ1 in vitro.
Knockdown of ASncmtRNA-2 inhibits the expression of TGFβ1 in HG-treated HRMCs
The role of ASncmtRNA-2 in regulating the expression of TGFβ1 was evaluated using a specific ASncmtRNA-2-silencing shRNA to knockdown expression of ASncmtRNA-2. As indicated in Fig. 4, the levels of ASncmtRNA-2 mRNA decreased to 60–70% by specific silencing shRNA in LG- and HG-treated cells. Furthermore, the expression of ASncmtRNA-2, TGFβ1 and FN were significantly increased in HG conditions as compared with LG (P<0.05). ASncmtRNA-2 was significantly depleted by shASncmtRNA-2 in the cells and mRNA levels of TGFβ1 and FN were significantly decreased by 34.8 and 44.4% (P<0.05), respectively. These findings suggest that knockdown of ASncmtRNA-2 is able to decrease the expression of TGFβ1, which in turn indicates that ASncmtRNA-2 positively regulates pro-fibrotic factors during DN progression.
Discussion
There are many complications associated with DM, including DN, which may lead to renal failure and eventual death (28). Overproduction of oxidative products, such as ROS, induces oxidative damage to the cellular and extracellular structures of the kidneys, particularly in HRMCs (29). Therefore, the present study used HRMCs to evaluate the expression of ASncmtRNA-2 upon HG and L-NAME stimulation. ROS are able to induce injury to human kidneys through the following mechanisms: i) Inducing lipid peroxidation, protein crosslinking and the formation of DNA adducts, leading to tissue damage; ii) inducing direct damage to cellular DNA; and iii) activating multiple cellular signaling pathways, including the nuclear factor-κB and TGFβ1 signaling pathways. These mechanisms induce further generation of ROS, secretion of cytokines, synthesis and deposition of extracellular matrix components, which induce more severe damage to kidneys (30,31). Therefore, it is necessary to identify a novel method to regulate ROS generation to reduce renal damage in DN in a clinical setting.
LncRNAs are typically defined as noncoding RNA >200 nt in length that have been revealed to have roles in various diseases, typically acting as scaffolds for multiple proteins and forming complexes to regulate protein expression (12,13). LncRNA UCA1 has previously been shown to contribute to cardiomyocyte apoptosis by suppressing the expression of P27, whose overexpression in heart injury is associated with enhanced ROS production and increased cell apoptosis (31). However, it remains to be elucidated whether other lncRNAs serve a role in mechanisms of oxidative stress.
Recently, studies of mitochondrial lncRNAs and their role in oxidative stress-induced damages have been conducted (9,18). It has been demonstrated that mitochondrial dysfunction is associated with high ROS levels and vice versa (18); therefore, mitochondrial lncRNAs are considered to be a viable target for the regulation of ROS production. A recent pilot study demonstrated that mitochondrial lncRNAASncmtRNA-2 was increased in aging and replicative senescence in human endothelial cells (18), suggesting that mitochondrial ASncmtRNA-2 may be associated with ROS generation. The present study further demonstrates that ASncmtRNA-2is overexpressed in DN in vivo. Inhibition of ROS production through administering L-NAME significantly ameliorated renal damage in mice and decreased the expression of ASncmtRNA-2, suggesting that ASncmtRNA-2 may be a substrate of ROS and may execute the ROS-mediated effects in DN. In the HG-cultured HRMCs, ROS was increased and the expression of ASncmtRNA-2 exhibited a similar pattern, further suggesting that ROS are able to induce the expression of ASncmtRNA-2. This hypothesis is further supported by the fact that inhibition of ROS via L-NAME administration decreased ASncmtRNA-2 expression. These in vivo and in vitro data suggest that ASncmtRNA-2 is a substrate of ROS that may have critical roles in DN progression.
The present study demonstrated that increased expression of ASncmtRNA-2 may be associated with higher extracellular matrix deposition in glomeruli, suggesting that ASncmtNA-2 may regulate the glomerular fibrosis process during DN. Therefore, a key pro-fibrotic factor, TGFβ1, and its downstream target FN, were evaluated. It was discovered that mice with DN exhibited severe glomerular fibrosis with significant increases in TGFβ1 and FN expression levels. mRNA expression levels of ASncmtRNA-2 were positively correlated with that of TGFβ1 in the DN samples, and the in vitro data also revealed that HG induced increases in ASncmtRNA-2 and TGFβ1 levels. Knockdown of ASncmtRNA-2 by specific shRNA induced significant decreases in mRNA levels of TGFβ1 and FN. These data suggest that TGFβ1 is regulated by ASncmtRNA-2 in DN, and ROS-induced expression of ASncmtRNA-2 may contribute to DN fibrosis via regulating the pro-fibrotic factor TGFβ1. However, the detailed mechanisms of how ASncmtRNA-2 regulates TGFβ1 remain to be elucidated. Bianchessi et al (18) recently suggested that ASncmtRNA-2 may function as a non-canonical precursor of microRNA (miRNA), hsa-miR-4485 and hsa-miR-1973, as they originate from a mitochondrial transcript. However, further research is required to elucidate the regulatory network between TGFβ1, ASncmtRNA-2 and miRNA in DN.
In conclusion, ASncmtRNA-2expression is upregulated in DN. ROS-induced expression of ASncmtRNA-2 may contribute to DN fibrosis through regulating TGFβ1; however, the mechanisms by which ASncmtRNA-2 regulates TGFβ1 remain to be elucidated. Therapeutic agents targeting ASncmtRNA-2 may prove to be effective for the prevention and treatment of DN.
References
- 1.Forbes JM, Cooper ME. Mechanisms of diabetic complications. Physiol Rev. 2013;93:137–188. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00045.2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Guariguata L, Whiting DR, Hambleton I, Beagley J, Linnenkamp U, Shaw JE. Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2013 and projections for 2035. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;103:137–149. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Collins AJ, Foley RN, Chavers B, Gilbertson D, Herzog C, Johansen K, Kasiske B, Kutner N, Liu J, St Peter W, et al. United States renal data system 2011 annual data report: Atlas of chronic kidney disease & end-stage renal disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012;59:e1–e420. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.11.015. (1 Suppl 1): A7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mogensen CE. Diabetic renal disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: New strategies for prevention and treatment. Treat Endocrinol. 2002;1:3–11. doi: 10.2165/00024677-200201010-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Remuzzi G, Macia M, Ruggenenti P. Prevention and treatment of diabetic renal disease in type 2 diabetes: The BENEDICT study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17(4):S90–S97. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005121324. Suppl 2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fridlyand LE, Philipson LH. Oxidative reactive species in cell injury: Mechanisms in diabetes mellitus and therapeutic approaches. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005;1066:136–151. doi: 10.1196/annals.1363.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Maiwulanjiang M, Chen J, Xin G, Gong AG, Miernisha A, Du CY, Lau KM, Lee PS, Chen J, Dong TT, et al. The volatile oil of Nardostachyos Radix et Rhizoma inhibits the oxidative stress-induced cell injury via reactive oxygen species scavenging and Akt activation in H9c2 cardiomyocyte. J Ethnopharmacol. 2014;153:491–498. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2014.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Di Marco ED, Jha JC, Sharma A, Wilkinson-Berka JL, Jandeleit-Dahm KA, de Haan JB. Are reactive oxygen species still the basis for diabetic complications? Clin Sci (Lond) 2015;129:199–216. doi: 10.1042/CS20150093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Qiu MT, Hu JW, Yin R, Xu L. Long noncoding RNA: An emerging paradigm of cancer research. Tumour Biol. 2013;34:613–620. doi: 10.1007/s13277-013-0658-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhang H, Chen Z, Wang X, Huang Z, He Z, Chen Y. Long non-coding RNA: A new player in cancer. J Hematol Oncol. 2013;6:37. doi: 10.1186/1756-8722-6-37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gibb EA, Warren RL, Wilson GW, Brown SD, Robertson GA, Morin GB, Holt RA. Activation of an endogenous retrovirus-associated long non-coding RNA in human adenocarcinoma. Genome Med. 2015;7:22. doi: 10.1186/s13073-015-0142-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Amit-Avraham I, Pozner G, Eshar S, Fastman Y, Kolevzon N, Yavin E, Dzikowski R. Antisense long noncoding RNAs regulate var gene activation in the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:E982–E991. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1420855112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hung CL, Wang LY, Yu YL, Chen HW, Srivastava S, Petrovics G, Kung HJ. A long noncoding RNA connects c-Myc to tumor metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:18697–18702. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1415669112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ding GL, Wang FF, Shu J, Tian S, Jiang Y, Zhang D, Wang N, Luo Q, Zhang Y, Jin F, et al. Transgenerational glucose intolerance with Igf2/H19 epigenetic alterations in mouse islet induced by intrauterine hyperglycemia. Diabetes. 2012;61:1133–1142. doi: 10.2337/db11-1314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ellis BC, Graham LD, Molloy PL. CRNDE, a long non-coding RNA responsive to insulin/IGF signaling, regulates genes involved in central metabolism. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1843:372–386. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kornfeld JW, Brüning JC. Regulation of metabolism by long, non-coding RNAs. Front Genet. 2014;5:57. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Motterle A, Gattesco S, Caille D, Meda P, Regazzi R. Involvement of long non-coding RNAs in beta cell failure at the onset of type 1 diabetes in NOD mice. Diabetologia. 2015;58:1827–1835. doi: 10.1007/s00125-015-3641-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bianchessi V, Badi I, Bertolotti M, Nigro P, D'Alessandra Y, Capogrossi MC, Zanobini M, Pompilio G, Raucci A, Lauri A. The mitochondrial lncRNA ASncmtRNA-2 is induced in aging and replicative senescence in Endothelial Cells. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2015;81:62–70. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2015.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Burzio VA, Villota C, Villegas J, Landerer E, Boccardo E, Villa LL, Martínez R, Lopez C, Gaete F, Toro V, et al. Expression of a family of noncoding mitochondrial RNAs distinguishes normal from cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:9430–9434. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903086106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mercer TR, Neph S, Dinger ME, Crawford J, Smith MA, Shearwood AM, Haugen E, Bracken CP, Rackham O, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, et al. The human mitochondrial transcriptome. Cell. 2011;146:645–658. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rackham O, Shearwood AM, Mercer TR, Davies SM, Mattick JS, Filipovska A. Long noncoding RNAs are generated from the mitochondrial genome and regulated by nuclear-encoded proteins. RNA. 2011;17:2085–2093. doi: 10.1261/rna.029405.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ocsan RJ, Lai YN, Prabhu KV, Hambly BD, McLachlan CS. Chronic NG-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) administration in C57BL/6J mice induces a sustained decrease in c-kit positive cells during development of cardiac hypertrophy. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2013;64:727–736. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Margaritescu C, Raica M, Simionescu C, Mogoantă L, Surpăţeanu M, Jaubert F, Bogdan F. Tumoral stroma of salivary pleomorphic adenoma-histopathological, histochemical and immunohistochemical study. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2005;46:211–223. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Pan X, Wang X, Wang X, Sun Z, Zhang X, Liang X, Li Z, Dou Z. Nitric oxide regulates blastocyst hatching in mice. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:6994–7001. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Merline R, Lazaroski S, Babelova A, Tsalastra-Greul W, Pfeilschifter J, Schluter KD, Gunther A, Iozzo RV, Schaefer RM, Schaefer L. Decorin deficiency in diabetic mice: Aggravation of nephropathy due to overexpression of profibrotic factors, enhanced apoptosis and mononuclear cell infiltration. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2009;60:S5–S13. (Suppl 4) [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tian YY, An LJ, Jiang L, Duan YL, Chen J, Jiang B. Catalpol protects dopaminergic neurons from LPS-induced neurotoxicity in mesencephalic neuron-glia cultures. Life Sci. 2006;80:193–199. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2006.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gordin D, Wadén J, Forsblom C, Thorn LM, Rosengård-Bärlund M, Heikkilä O, Saraheimo M, Tolonen N, Hietala K, Soro-Paavonen A, et al. Arterial stiffness and vascular complications in patients with type 1 diabetes: The Finnish Diabetic Nephropathy (FinnDiane) Study. Ann Med. 2012;44:196–204. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2010.530681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chandel NS, Budinger GR. The cellular basis for diverse responses to oxygen. Free Radic Biol Med. 2007;42:165–174. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2006.10.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Brownlee M. The pathobiology of diabetic complications: A unifying mechanism. Diabetes. 2005;54:1615–1625. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.6.1615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Giacco F, Brownlee M. Oxidative stress and diabetic complications. Circ Res. 2010;107:1058–1070. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.223545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]