Skip to main content
Journal of Applied Oral Science logoLink to Journal of Applied Oral Science
. 2010 Jul-Aug;18(4):343–345. doi: 10.1590/S1678-77572010000400004

Evaluation of care of dentoalveolar trauma

Luiz Fernando FARINIUK 1,, Maria Helena de SOUSA 2, Vânia Portela Dietzel WESTPHALEN 1, Everdan CARNEIRO 1, Ulisses X SILVA NETO 1, Liliane ROSKAMP 3, Ana Égide CAVALI 2
PMCID: PMC5349070  PMID: 20835567

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate cases of dental trauma treated at the specialized center of Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil, during a period of 2 years.

Material and Methods

A total of 647 patients were evaluated and treated between 2003 and 2005. Data obtained from each patient were tabulated and analyzed as to gender, age, etiology, time elapsed after the injury, diagnosis (type of trauma), and affected teeth.

Results

The results revealed that male individuals aged 7 to 13 years presented the highest prevalence of injury, and falling was the main causal factor. In most cases, the time elapsed between the accident and the first care ranged from 4 to 24 h. A total of 1,747 teeth were affected, with higher incidence of concussion/subluxation and coronal fracture, followed by lateral luxation and avulsion. The permanent maxillary central incisors were the most commonly affected teeth.

Conclusion

The frequency and causes of dentoalveolar trauma should be investigated for identification of risk groups, treatment demands and costs in order to allow for the establishment of effective preventive measures that can reduce the treatment duration and costs for both patients and oral health services.

Keywords: Tooth injury, Dentoalveolar trauma, Examination, Prevalence

INTRODUCTION

Dentoalveolar traumas are observed and treated in dental clinics. Their severity depends on the energy of impact and direction of the causal agent, as well as on the resistance of the tissues surrounding the traumatized teeth, which are more susceptible at the anterior region11, along with immunological factors, particularly in cases of avulsion and replantation15. Situations such as car, sports and working accidents, and falling are the most common reasons for dental traumatism7,11,20.

Facial and dental injuries have become an epidemiological health problem and may be more frequent than periodontal disease and caries in a near future, causing social, esthetic and psychological disturbances to the patients3,14,18. In the present study, an epidemiological evaluation of patients attending the Dentoalveolar Trauma Care Service of the Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná, Brazil, between 2003 and 2005, was undertaken to better analyze the requirements of emergency assistance.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sixty hundred and forty seven patients with dentoalveolar trauma were treated at the Dentoalveolar Trauma Care Service of the Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná, Brazil, between 2003 and 2005. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for collection of data from their dental charts, and the study protocol was approved by the University Research ethics Committee (Protocol #1406). Information referring to gender, age, etiology, period of the year and hour of occurrence, time elapsed after the injury, diagnosis (type of trauma) and most affected teeth, were retrieved, plotted and presented in tables for further analysis.

RESULTS

In the 3-year period of this study with a sample of 647 patients, dentoalveolar traumas occurred more frequently in males, accounting for 64.1% of cases, with mean age of 16.09 years. The most affected age range was 7 to 13 years (31.4%), followed by 14 to 21 years (23.6%) (Table 1). Analysis of the etiology of injuries revealed that falling, car accidents and physical aggression were the main causal factors (Table 2). With regard to the time elapsed after the injury until first care was provided, 32.6% of the subjected sought treatment within 4 to 24 h after injury, followed by 2 to 4 h (20.6%) (Table 3). A total of 1,747 teeth were affected. Most injuries were concussion/subluxation (23.8%), coronal fracture (23.7%), followed by lateral luxation (13.7%) and avulsion (13.6%) (Table 4). The permanent maxillary central incisors were the most affected teeth (53.2%), followed by the permanent maxillary lateral incisors (17.1%) and the primary maxillary central incisors (10.3%). The most frequent lesions in the permanent maxillary central incisors were coronal fracture (28.0%), concussion/subluxation (23.7%) and avulsion (15.2%) (Table 5).

Tabela 1.

Age range gender divided into female and male

Gender     Age range (percentage)     Total
  0-6 7-13 14-21 22-29 30-40 > 40
               
Female 56 (24.1) 82 (35.3) 35 (15.1) 34 (14.7) 19 (8.2) 6 (2.6) 232 (100)
Male 62 (14.9) 121 (29.2) 118 (28.4) 62 (14.9) 37 (8.9) 15 (3.6) 415 (100)
Total 118 (18.2) 203 (31.4) 153 (23.6) 96 (14.8) 56 (8.7) 21 (3.2) 647 (100)

Tabela 2.

Etiology of dental trauma

Etiology N (%)
   
Car accident 85 (13.10)
Sports accident 21 (3.20)
Physical aggression 74 (11.40)
Running over 26 (4.00)
Frontal crash 53 (8.20)
Falling 349 (53.90)
Others 23 (3.60)
Unreported 16 (2.50)
Total 647 (100.00)

Tabela 3.

Time elapsed between the accident and the first care

Time elapsed N (%)
   
<1 hour 110 (103)
1-2 h 223 (214)
2-4 h 197 (129)
>4 to 24 h 134 (121)
Up to 7 days 202 (210)
> 7 days -
unreported 24 (20)
total 43 (53)

Tabela 4.

Frequency of each diagnosis of dental trauma

Diagnosis (type of trauma) N (%)
   
Avulsion 237 (13.6)
Concussion/subluxation 416 (23.8)
Extrusion 110 (6.3)
Crown fracture 414 (23.7)
Crown-root fracture 29 (1.7)
Bone fracture 85 (4.9)
Root fracture 104 (6.0)
Intrusion 113 (6.5)
Lateral luxation 239 (13.7)
Total 1,747 (100)

Tabela 5.

Frequency of the different types of trauma to the permanent maxillary central incisors

Diagnosis (type of trauma) N (%)
   
Avulsion 141 (15.2)
Concussion/subluxation 220 (23.7)
Extrusion 56 (6.0)
Crown fracture 260 (28.0)
Crown-root fracture 11 (1.2)
Bone fracture 38 (4.1)
Root fracture 74 (8.0)
Intrusion 42 (4.5)
Lateral luxation 87 (9.4)
Total 929 (100)

DISCUSSION

An analysis of investigations of dentoalveolar traumas reveals that comparisons are very complex due to the different research methodologies employed8. The prevalence of dentoalveolar trauma varies according to the type of study, country where the study was conducted, and even different regions in a single country7. Statistics reveal that 4.2% to 36% of children, adolescents and young adults have already experienced dental trauma7.

In the present study, most traumas affected male individuals, as reported in other studies13,19,20. Boys are usually more susceptible to traumatic tooth injuries due to their greater involvement in sports activities, car accidents and fights12. The most frequently affected age range was 7 to 13 years, accounting for 31.4% of cases. Sakai, et al.16 (2005), found a higher incidence in children aged 0 and 3 years (34.42%), followed by those in the 7-12-year-old group (18.12%). The most frequent etiologic agents were falls, car accidents and physical assaults, which agree with the findings of other studies2,7,17.

According to the diagnosis (type of trauma), there was higher incidence of concussion/subluxation, followed by coronal fracture, lateral luxation and avulsion. Some studies found different results4,5, yet others agree with the present findings12,20. The high rate of luxation and avulsion were probably related to the severity of injuries.

As far as the time elapsed after the trauma until first care was provided, 74.4% of patients seen by a dentist in the same day of the accident, in most after 4 h. Only 5.9% of the cases were treated up to 1 h after the injury, which is probably due to the fact that dentists are not always the first health professionals assisting these patients, who often search for care at hospital emergency units. It has also been observed that decisions taken by health professionals, including dentists, are not always correct, which delays proper care and impairs the prognosis in medium and long term, due to the lack of knowledge of the management of dental trauma5,10.

Immediate care is required in cases of dentoalveolar trauma. This type of emergency situation often requires several sessions for treatment, continuity for investigation and even treatment of possible sequelae1,6.

The most affected teeth were the permanent maxillary central incisors, accounting for 53.2% of cases, which exhibited higher occurrence of coronal fracture, concussion/subluxation, and avulsion.

Some epidemiological studies are conducted at hospitals2, whereas others are conducted at Pediatric Dentistry clinics9. The present study was conducted at a specialized facility that treats only patients with dental trauma. This dentoalveolar trauma care service was created due to the gap existing in this type of care, especially concerning healthcare to the poor population.

CONCLUSION

The frequency and causes of dentoalveolar trauma should be investigated for identification of risk groups, treatment demands and costs in order to allow for the establishment of effective preventive measures that can reduce the treatment duration and costs for both patients and oral health services. educational campaigns are needed in order to inform teachers, parents and health professionals about the best emergency measures, and reduce the time elapsed between the dental trauma and the first care.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Al-Jundi SH. Type of treatment, prognosis, and estimation of time spent to manage dental trauma in late presentation cases at a dental teaching hospital: a longitudinal and retrospective study. Dent Traumatol. 2004;20:1–3. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-4469.2004.00218.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Andreasen JO. Aetiology and pathogenesis of traumatic dental injuries. A clinical study of 1298 cases. Scand J Dent Res. 1970;78:329–342. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1970.tb02080.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM. Incidence of dental trauma: quovadis. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1990;6:78–80. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM. Textbook and color atlas of traumatic injuries to the teeh. 3rd ed. Saint Louis: Mosby; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM, Skeie A, Hjorting-Hansen E, Schwartz O. Effect of treatment delay upon pulp and periodontal healing of traumatic dental injuries -a review article. Dent Traumatol. 2002;18:116–128. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-9657.2002.00079.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.De Rossi M, De Rossi A, Queiroz AM, Nelson P., Filho Management of a complex dentoalveolar trauma: a case report. Braz Dent J. 2009;20(3):259–262. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402009000300016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.García-Ballesta C, Pérez-Lajarín L, Castejón-Navas I. Prevalencia y etiología e los traumatismos dentales. Una revisión. RCOE. 2003;8:131–141. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Grimm S, Frazão P, Antunes JLF, Castellanos RA, Narvai PC. Dental injury among Brazilian schoolchildren in the state of São Paulo. Dent Traumatol. 2004;20:134–138. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-4469.2004.00238.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Haaviko K, Rananen L. A folow-up study of injuries to permanent and primary teeth in children. Proc Finn Dent Soc. 1976;72:152–162. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jackson NG, Waterhouse PJ, Maguire A. Factors affecting treatment outcomes following complicated crown fractures managed in primary and secondary care. Dent Traumatol. 2006;22:179–185. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2006.00369.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kramer FP, Zembruski C, Ferreira SH, Feldens CA. Traumatic dental injuries in Brazilian preschool children. Dent Traumatol. 2003;19:299–303. doi: 10.1046/j.1600-9657.2003.00203.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Panzarini SR, Pedrini D, Poi WR, Sonoda CK, Brandini DA, Castro JCM. Dental trauma involving root fracture and periodontal ligament injury: a 10-year retrospective study. Braz Oral Res. 2008;22(3):229–234. doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242008000300007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rocha MJC, Cardoso M. Traumatized permanent teeth in Brazilian children assisted at the Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil. Dent Traumatol. 2001;17:245–249. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-9657.2001.170601.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rodríguez JG. Diagnóstico y tratamiento de las fracturas coronárias: una revisión de la literatura. Acta Odontol Venez. 2004;42:209–212. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Roskamp L, Westphalen VPD, Lima JHC, Carneiro E, Fariniuk LF, Silva UX, Neto, et al. The influence of atopy in the prognosis of the replantation of avulsed teeth. J Periodontol. 2009;80:1121–1124. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.090019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sakai VT, Magalhães AC, Pessan JP, Silva SMB, Machado MAAM. Urgency treatment profile of 0 to 15 year-old children assisted at urgency dental service from Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo. J Appl Oral Sci. 2005;13(4):340–344. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572005000400005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sandalli N, Cildir S, Guler N. Clinical investigation of traumatic injuries in Yeditepe University, Turkey during the last 3 years. Dent Traumatol. 2005;21:188–194. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2005.00309.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Scariot R, Oliveira IA, Passeri LA, Rebellato NLB, Müller PR. Maxillofacial injuries in a group of Brazilian subjects under 18 years of age. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17(3):195–198. doi: 10.1590/S1678-77572009000300012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Shinya K, Taira T, Sawada M, Isshiki N. Facial injuries rom failing: age-dependent characteristics. Ann Plast Surg. 1993;30:417–423. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199305000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Silva AC, Passeri LA, Mazonetto R, Moraes M, Moreira RWF. Incidence of dental trauma in Brazil: a 1-year evalution. Dent Traumatol. 2004;20:6–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-4469.2004.00212.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Oral Science are provided here courtesy of Bauru School of Dentistry

RESOURCES