Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 14;18:125. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1872-0

Table 3.

Subgroup analysis of medical fields, stratified by funding source, comparing OR of favorable primary outcome between intervention and control groups

Funding source Cancer, OR (95% CI) Cardiovascular, OR (95% CI) Infectious disease, OR (95% CI) Neurology, OR (95% CI) Autoimmunity, OR (95% CI) Diabetes, OR (95% CI) Other, OR (95% CI)
Profit 1.89 (1.65–2.17) 1.83 (1.50–2.22) 1.96 (1.57–2.44) 2.12 (1.36–3.30) 4.34 (2.72–6.94) 1.86 (1.00–3.45) 2.52 (1.59–3.97)
Mixed funding 1.55 (1.26–1.90) 1.17 (1.03–1.20)a 1.45 (1.17–1.79) 1.57 (1.16–2.14) 1.46 (1.05–2.03)a 1.05 (0.91–1.20) 1.49 (0.96–2.07)
Nonprofit 1.13 (0.87–1.43)a 1.56 (1.37–1.76)b 1.33 (1.18–1.50)a 1.13 (0.97–1.32)a 2.39 (1.20–4.77) 1.12 (0.96–1.29) 1.31 (1.23–1.41)a

aDenotes statistical difference compared with the for-profit funded studies (p < 0.05)

bDenotes statistical difference compared with mixed funded studies (p < 0.05)