Table 3. Comparison of accuracy for MSI-H detection.
mSINGS | ||||
Metric | COAD/READ | UCEC | COAD/READ + UCEC | STAD |
Sensitivity | 84.2% | 53.1% | 66.7% | 92.0% |
Specificity | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100% | 100.0% |
Accuracy | 92.1% | 76.8% | 83.4% | 96.0% |
MSISensor | ||||
Metric | COAD/READ | UCEC | COAD/READ + UCEC | STAD |
Sensitivity | 92.1% | 98.0% | 95.4% | 98.0% |
Specificity | 92.1% | 98.0% | 95.5% | 100.0% |
Accuracy | 92.1% | 98.0% | 95.4% | 99.0% |
MANTIS | ||||
Metric | COAD/READ | UCEC | COAD/READ + UCEC | STAD |
Sensitivity | 100.0% | 91.8% | 95.4% | 100.0% |
Specificity | 97.4% | 100.0% | 98.9% | 100.0% |
Accuracy | 98.7% | 96.0% | 97.1% | 100.0% |
The performance of mSINGS, MSISensor, and MANTIS over 275 COAD/READ, UCEC, and STAD sample pairs.