Abstract
A wide range of spectroscopic approaches have been used to interrogate the mononuclear iron metallocenter in 2-oxoglutarate (2OG)-dependent oxygenases. The results from these spectroscopic studies have provided valuable insights into the structural changes at the active site during substrate binding and catalysis, thus providing critical information that complements investigations of these enzymes by x-ray crystallography, biochemical, and computational approaches. This mini-review highlights taurine hydroxylase (taurine:2OG dioxygenase, TauD) as a case study to illustrate the wealth of knowledge that can be generated by applying a diverse array of spectroscopic investigations to a single enzyme. In particular, electronic absorption, circular dichroism, magnetic circular dichroism, conventional and pulse electron paramagnetic, Mössbauer, X-ray absorption, and resonance Raman methods have been exploited to uncover the properties of the metal site in TauD.
Keywords: 2-Oxoglutarate, Nonheme iron, Oxygenase, Spectroscopy
Introduction
The 2-oxoglutarate (2OG)-dependent oxygenases (2OG oxygenases) belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze hydroxylation, chlorination, desaturation, ring formation, ring expansion/contraction, epoxidation, endoperoxidation, and epimerization reactions using a wide variety of substrates [1, 2]. This remarkable catalytic diversity is united by chemical mechanisms that include Fe(IV)-oxo (ferryl) intermediates [3]. The mononuclear iron active sites of these enzymes are located at the opening of a double-stranded β-helix scaffold, with the metal generally bound by three protein side chains in a His-X-Asp(Glu)-Xn-His motif [4]. A simplified depiction of the hydroxylation reaction cycle (Fig. 1) shows the major spectroscopically characterized species. The resting enzyme (Fig. 1a) contains Fe(II) in octahedral coordination where three water molecules occupy one face of the metal ion. Two waters are displaced by 2OG which binds in bidentate coordination to Fe(II) via its C1 carboxylate and C2 keto group (Fig. 1b). The primary substrate (R-H) binds near the metallocenter leading to displacement of the remaining water and resulting in square pyramidyl geometry of Fe(II) (Fig. 1c). O2 binds to the newly opened coordination site and presumably forms an Fe(III)-superoxo species that has not been spectroscopically detected. Subsequent C-C and O-O cleavage reactions result in release of the 2OG C1 group as CO2 and formation of succinate and the Fe(IV)-oxo intermediate (Fig. 1d), both containing O atoms derived from O2. Oxygen insertion into the primary substrate C-H bond returns the metallocenter to the Fe(II) state (Fig. 1e), and the cycle is completed by dissociation of products and association of three water molecules.
Fig. 1.

Simplified depiction of the 2OG-dependent hydroxylase reaction cycle illustrating the major spectroscopically characterized intermediates
Taurine hydroxylase (also known as taurine:2OG dioxygenase or TauD) is the best-characterized representative of this enzyme family [5]. The microbial enzyme catalyzes the hydroxylation of taurine (aminoethanesulfonate) forming an the unstable intermediate that spontaneously decomposes to aminoacetaldehyde and sulfite, which is utilized as a sulfur source [6]. Here, we use TauD as a case study to illustrate how various spectroscopic approaches have provided powerful insights into the structure and properties of the enzyme metallocenter during substrate binding and catalysis.
Electronic absorption spectroscopy of TauD
Like other proteins, TauD exhibits electronic transitions in the ultraviolet (UV) associated with its Trp and Tyr residues, and the spectrum is nearly identical when Fe(II) is added to apoprotein to provide the holoenzyme (Fig. 2a) [7]. Close inspection of the difference spectrum for these samples (Fig. 2b), however, reveals modulations associated with conformational changes affecting the environment of the aromatic residues. Similar perturbations were observed upon binding of other metal ions or taurine, and titration studies were used to estimate binding affinities [7]. Because aromatic residues are commonly observed at the active sites of 2OG oxygenases, such UV absorption difference spectra may be useful for monitoring metal and ligand interactions in favorable cases with other members of this enzyme family.
Fig. 2.
Electronic absorption spectroscopic investigations of TauD. a Absolute spectra of TauD apoprotein and holoenzyme (25 μM, pH 8.0) and b difference spectrum associated with Fe(II) binding to apoprotein. c Difference spectra of TauD·Fe(II)·2OG·taurine, TauD·Fe(II)·2OG, and TauD·Fe(II)·taurine minus the spectrum of TauD·Fe(II); 0.5 mM protein final concentration. d Repetitive spectra obtained for TauD·Fe(II)·2OG (red) mixed with an equal volume of O2-saturated buffer at 13 s (yellow) to 3 h (blue); 0.28 mM protein final concentration. e Stopped-flow difference spectra of TauD·Fe(II)·2OG·taurine mixed with O2-saturated buffer for 20 ms (solid trace), 68 ms (dot-dash trace), 210 ms (dotted trace), and 10 s (dashed trace) minus the spectrum of TauD·Fe(II); 1.2 mM protein final concentration. f Time-dependent changes in absorbance at 318, 520, and 700 nm for the sample shown in panel e. Reprinted with permission from [7] (a and b), [8] (c), [9] (d), and [10] (e and f)
In contrast to the lack of a visible absorption spectrum in TauD·Fe(II) (Fig. 2a), TauD·Fe(II)·2OG and TauD·Fe(II)·2OG·taurine possess visible (pink/purple-colored) chromophores (Fig. 2c; ε530 = 140–240 M−1 cm−1 and ε520 = 180–270 M−1 cm−1) [8, 10–12]. Analogous features in clavaminic acid synthase (another 2OG oxygenase) were identified as metal-to-ligand charge-transfer (MLCT) transitions associated with Fe(II) dyz, dx2 -y2, and dz2 → 2OG π* energy levels with 2OG in bidentate coordination to the metal ion [13]. Stopped-flow (SF) spectroscopy was used to show the Fe(II)/2OG chromophore forms at a rate that is independent of substrate or enzyme concentration, consistent with initial binding of 2OG to the enzyme followed by a conformational change to create the bidentate state that generated the color. The Fe(II)/2OG MLCT transitions have been used as a diagnostic probe to demonstrate correct protein folding and proper active site formation in other proteins, even when the primary substrate is unknown (e.g. [14]).
Visible spectroscopic changes are sometimes observed during non-productive reactions of 2OG oxygenases. For example, when TauD·Fe(II)·2OG (lacking the substrate taurine) is exposed to O2 (Fig. 2d) the protein forms a transient tyrosyl radical (ε408≥1,600−1 cm−1) followed by the slow development of a greenish brown color (ε550 = 460−1 cm−1) [9]. This chromophore very slowly shifts to a bright green species (ε720 ~300 M−1 cm−1) upon standing for several days [15]. Similarly, a green species (ε720 = 380 M−1 cm−1) is formed when TauD·Fe(II)·succinate is exposed to O2 (or H2O2), and the spectrum of this species is shifted to one with a 550 nm maximum when bicarbonate is added [15]. Mutagenesis, resonance Raman, and mass spectrometric evidence were used to show these chromophores derive from the conversion of Tyr73 into a dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA) residue that chelates Fe(III) [9, 15, 16]. The ligand-to-metal charge-transfer (LMCT) transitions of this catecholate-like species are modulated by the binding of product bicarbonate. As purified from aerobically grown cells, a portion of TauD has the oxidized form of DOPA, DOPA quinone, as shown by the addition of Fe(II) leading to the generation of a DOPA-Fe(III) LMCT transition or by the additionof Cr(II) to anaerobic protein resulting in a Cr(III) semiquinone spectrum (ε434 = 1,000 M−1 cm−1 and ε690 = 350 M−1 cm−1) [17, 18]. Self-hydroxylation reactions of active site Tyr residues (resulting in DOPA-Fe(III) species) or Trp residues (yielding hydroxyindole-Fe(III) species) give rise to green or blue LMCT transitions in several other family members (e.g. [19–22]).
SF-UV-visible spectroscopy has proven to be a powerful tool to monitor the productive reaction of 2OG oxygenases with O2. When an anaerobic sample of TauD·Fe(II)·2OG·taurine (ε520 ~200 M−1 cm−1) is mixed with O2 at 5 °C, an intermediate identified as the ferryl species (Fig. 1D, ε318 = 1,550 M−1 cm−1) forms within 25 ms and decays by 600 ms (Fig. 2e and 2f) [10]. Return of the 520 nm absorbing species is delayed compared to loss of the 318 nm intermediate, providing evidence for a second intermediate in the reaction. The apparent first-order rate constant for ferryl formation is linearly dependent on the O2 concentration [11, 23], and it decays with a first-order rate constant that is diminished by substrate deuteration demonstrating that it is responsible for hydrogen atom abstraction (kH/kD = 28–50) [24]. Modifications of the kinetics of the ferryl intermediate have been examined using this technique for a suite of TauD variants and with alternative sulfonic acid substrates [11, 25, 26]. SF-UV-visible spectroscopy has been used to detect this intermediate in TauD from Pseudomonas putida [12] and in several other family members (e.g. [27–29]).
CD and MCD spectroscopy of TauD
The study of mononuclear S = 2 Fe(II) sites in proteins has been greatly aided by recent developments in circular dichroism (CD) and especially magnetic circular dichroism (MCD) spectroscopies [30–32]. The TauD holoenzyme at 298 K exhibits positive CD transitions at 8,850 and 10,600 cm−1 which offer little insight into the metallocenter geometry. By contrast, the positive MCD transitions at 8,900 and 10,700 cm−1 at 1.8 K (Fig. 3a and 3b, green traces) [33] are consistent with 5Eg → dx2-y2 and dz2 ligand field transitions centered at ~10,000 cm−1 and split by ~2,000 cm−1 as seen in distorted six-coordinate Fe(II) sites (Fig. 3c). Also compatible with distorted 6-coordinate geometry, TauD·Fe(II)·2OG has a positive transition at 7,400 cm−1 and a negative transition at 11,150 cm−1 while the MCD spectra reveals positive features at 8,190 and 11,450 cm−1 (Fig. 3a and 3b, blue traces) [33]. Furthermore, TauD·Fe(II)·2OG·taurine provides a negative band at 5,000 cm−1 and a positive band at 10,150 cm−1 in the CD spectrum and an intense positive transition at 5,500 cm−1 along with weak positive features at 8,550 and 10,400 cm−1 in the MCD spectrum (Fig. 3a and 3b, red traces) [33]. By comparison to spectra of species with known coordination geometry (Fig. 3c), this complex was identified as a mixture of 6-coordinate and square pyramidyl 5-coordinate sites. This finding is consistent with the hypothesis that the binding of taurine results in loss of a water ligand (Fig. 1, b conversion to c) to create a site for O2 addition. Substrate-triggered creation of an O2-binding site has been noted in clavaminic acid synthase [34], a 2OG-dependent halogenase [33], and other mononuclear iron oxygenases [35, 36].
Fig. 3.
CD and MCD spectra of TauD. a CD spectra of TauD apoprotein (black), TauD·Fe(II) (green), TauD·Fe(II)·2OG (blue), and TauD·Fe(II)·2OG·taurine (red) at 298 K. b MCD spectra of TauD·Fe(II) (green), TauD·Fe(II)·2OG (blue), and TauD·Fe(II)·2OG·taurine (red) at 1.8 K in the presence of a 7 tesla (T) magnetic field. c Representative MCD spectra of Fe(II) species with octahedral, square pyramidyl, trigonal bipyramidyl, and tetrahedral ligand geometries. Reprinted with permission from [33] (a and b) and [31] (c)
EPR spectroscopy of NO-bound TauD
Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) studies of the Fe(II) catalytic site of TauD have required the addition of NO as a substitute for substrate O2 to form an S=3/2, {FeNO}7 paramagnetic center [37]. This approach for the EPR study of non-heme Fe enzymes was pioneered by Lipscomb and Münck [38–40], and its utility for structural studies using Q-band ENDOR spectroscopy to measure ligand hyperfine couplings has been demonstrated by Hoffman and coworkers [41–43]. In addition to creating an EPR-active catalytic site, NO coordination serves to approximate O2 binding and the Fe-NO bond provides a reference for the interpretation of ligand hyperfine couplings in terms of structure [44, 45]. We have used the pulse EPR methods of electron spin echo envelope modulation (ESEEM) and hyperfine sublevel correlation (HYSCORE) at conventional X-band frequency to characterize Fe ligation for enzyme samples prepared with different combinations of substrate and cofactor. ESEEM is especially useful for this task as it is sensitive to both the moderate hyperfine couplings typical for Fe(II)-bound ligands and the weak hyperfine couplings expected for second coordination sphere ligands like substrate taurine [46].
Figure 4a shows the X-band continuous wave (cw) EPR spectrum of the quaternary complex of TauD with 2OG, taurine, and NO (TauD·{FeNO}7·2OG·taurine). The spectrum stems from the lower energy Kramer’s doublet of an S = 3/2 {FeNO}7 center characterized by a large, positive zero-field interaction (D > 1 cm−1). The spectrum is nearly axial with |E|/D ≤ 0.003 and an EPR absorbance that covers a 170 mT range of magnetic field strengths from g = 4 to g = 2. The top two traces of Figure 4b show normalized 3-pulse ESEEM data that were collected for this sample at 330 mT. The top trace is for a sample prepared with 1,1-2H-taurine while the middle trace was prepared with unlabeled taurine. These data sets are nearly identical with either sample showing overall modulation depths of about 20% that consist of contributions from the nitrogen atoms of coordinated NO and histidine, and from the protons of primary and secondary coordination sphere ligands. The bottom trace of Figure 4b, obtained by dividing the 2H-taurine trace (top) by the taurine trace (center), represents the contribution of a single coupled 2H [47]. The 2H-ESEEM spectrum corresponding to these data is shown in Figure 4c in the box marked 330 mT (black trace).
Fig. 4.
EPR and ESEEM spectra of TauD. a Continuous wave (cw)-EPR spectrum of the quaternary complex of TauD·{FeNO}7·2OG·taurine collected at 9.682 GHz and at 4.0 K. b The top two traces are normalized 3-pulse ESEEM data collected for TauD·{FeNO}7·2OG·1,1-2H-taurine (top) and TauD·{FeNO}7·2OG·taurine (middle). These data were collected under the following conditions: microwave frequency, 9.682 GHz; magnetic field, 330 mT; τ-value, 144 ns; and sample temperature, 4.0 K. ESEEM data were normalized by division of a bi-exponential decay function. The lowest trace is the 2H-ESEEM component obtained by dividing the top trace by the middle trace. c 2H-ESEEM spectra (black traces) obtained by Fourier transformation of the 2H/1H time domain data. The red traces are fits to a Hamiltonian model for a single coupled 2H nucleus with Aiso = 0; T = 0.191 MHz; AFrame = (0, 26º, 0); e2qQ/h = 0.22 MHz; and QFrame = (− 21º, 52º, 0). d Stick drawing made from the TauD active site crystal structure (PDB: 1GY9) using the Pymol visualization program. Adapted with permission from [46] (a and b) and [48] (c)
Figure 4c shows 2H-ESEEM spectra collected at six magnetic field positions across the cw-EPR spectrum of the TauD·{FeNO}7·2OG·taurine complex (Fig. 4a). These data contain detailed information on the location of the coupled taurine deuteron with respect to the Fe-NO bond that is manifest in the frequency, lineshape, and amplitude of the 2H-ESEEM response as a function of magnetic field strength. Analysis of these data was accomplished using EasySpin, a public-domain EPR simulation program that runs in the MATLAB environment, to simultaneously fit all six of the spectra shown in Figure 4c [49–51]. The results, shown as red traces in Figure 4c, arise from a single coupled 2H characterized by a dipolar coupling of 0.19 ± 0.03 MHz, and an orientation that places the coupled 2H on the base of a cone that makes a 26 ± 6º angle with the Fe-NO bond axis [48]. The drawing shown in Figure 4d was produced from a crystal structure obtained for TauD (PDB: 1GY9) where the crystallization was done in the presence of 2OG and taurine [52]. If one assumes that NO binds directly opposite to the axial histidyl imidazole ligand, along the black arrow, then the crystal structure indicates the closest C1-2H would be 3.1 Å from the metal ion with the coupled nucleus lying on the base of a cone that makes a 29º angle with the Fe-NO bond. Using the point dipole-dipole approximation, and an Fe spin density weighting of 0.9, our measured deuterium dipolar coupling translates into a 3.9 ± 0.2 Å distance between the coupled deuteron and Fe [48]. While there is good agreement between our 2H-ESEEM results and the crystal structure for the orientation of the coupled deuteron with respect to the Fe-NO bond, there is a substantial difference in its distance from the metal ion. In addition, our 2H-ESEEM analysis also provided information on the orientation of the principle axis of the 2H-nuclear quadrupole interaction, coincident with the taurine C1-2H bond that was at odds with the 1GY9 structure. Specifically, we found a 52 ± 17° orientation for the C1-2H bond axis with respect to the Fe-NO bond, while the 1GY9 structure shows this angle to be close to 30°. To explore differences in the 1GY9 structure that may result from the binding of NO to Fe, we used the Avogadro software package to re-optimize the position of taurine using the unified force field option. This exercise yielded a taurine orientation at the active site that shows good agreement with both the dipolar distance and the C1-2H bond orientation derived from ESEEM measurements [48].
The study of primary coordination sphere ligands using ESEEM involves separating the modulations from 14N and 1H nuclei that are substantially overlapped in frequency. This process is readily accomplished for nonheme {FeNO}7 centers using 4-pulse HYSCORE spectroscopy, a 2-dimensional ESEEM experiment. Figure 5a shows the 3-pulse ESEEM spectrum collected for a ternary complex of TauD·{FeNO}7·taurine at 280 mT (see inset for the cw-EPR spectrum). This 1-dimensional spectrum shows approximately 20 different modulation components arising from strong- and weak-coupled 14N and 1H nuclei. The 4-pulse HYSCORE spectrum that corresponds to these data is shown as the upper contour plot of Figure 5b. In HYSCORE spectroscopy, hyperfine couplings that are large compared to the Larmor frequency of the coupled nucleus are sorted by the 2-dimensional fast Fourier transform (FT) into the quadrant where one of the correlated frequencies has a negative phase, the (−,+) quadrant [53]. As a result, the directly coordinated 14N nuclei of the coordinated histidine ligands and NO contribute to the cross-peaks resolved in the (−,+), or left-hand quadrant. Cross-peaks arising from the coupled protons of the histidyl imidazole side chains and bound water molecules are resolved in the (+,+) quadrant. The protons of bound water ligands are further characterized by strong dipolar couplings and easily distinguished by HYSCORE spectroscopy [54, 55]. The cross-peaks due to these protons are circled in red on the HYSCORE spectrum shown (Fig. 5b, top). The HYSCORE spectrum collected at 280 mT for a sample of the ternary complex of TauD·{FeNO}7·2OG also is shown (Fig. 5b, bottom). These data show the displacement of bound water that occurs upon 2OG chelation to the {FeNO}7 paramagnetic center and also show that the electronic structure of the center has been altered in a fashion that affects the 14N hyperfine coupling from NO and the histidines.
Fig. 5.
HYSCORE spectroscopy of TauD. a 3- pulse ESEEM spectrum of the ternary complex of TauD• {FeNO}7•taurine collected under the following conditions: microwave frequency, 9.68 GHz; magnetic field, 280 mT; τ-value, 84 ns; and sample temperature, 4.0 K. b 4-pulse HYSCORE spectra collected under the same conditions as a, for the ternary complexes of TauD• {FeNO}7 •taurine (top) and TauD• {FeNO}7 •2OG (bottom). Pi pulses for the HYSCORE were 16 ns FWHM and approximately 800 W microwave power, 90º pulse were 16 ns FWHM with a peak power of 200W
Mössbauer and XAS analysis of TauD
The initial TauD reaction intermediate detected by SF-UV-visible spectroscopy (Fig. 2e) was identified as a ferryl species by the combined use of freeze-quench (FQ) Mössbauer analysis, FQ X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), and continuous-flow resonance Raman spectroscopy. The first two approaches are described here and the third is summarized in the following section.
The Mössbauer spectrum of 57Fe-containing TauD·Fe(II) (Fig. 6a, top trace) reveals a quadrupole doublet (with an isomer shift, δ, of 1.27 mm s−1 and a quadrupole splitting, ΔEQ, of 3.06 mm s−1), indicating high-spin Fe(II) [10]. This spectrum shifts to one with altered parameters (δ = 1.16 mm s−1 and ΔEQ = 2.76 mm s−1) in the presence of 2OG and taurine (Fig. 6a, second trace), consistent with the transition from 6-coordinate to 5-coordinate geometry [10]. When TauD·Fe(II)·2OG·taurine is mixed with O2 and frozen after selected intervals, the FQ Mössbauer samples exhibit a new spectrum (δ = 0.31 mm s−1 and ΔEQ = 0.88 mm s−1; Fig. 6a, bottom traces) that forms and decays with the same kinetic constants (Fig. 6b) as the reaction intermediate detected by electronic absorption spectroscopy. The Mössbauer spectrum of the reaction intermediate varies with the external applied magnetic field (Fig. 6c) in a manner consistent with an integer spin species possessing S = 2 [10, 56, 57]. This reaction intermediate exhibits no EPR features whereas cryoreduction of the sample leads to a high-spin Fe(III) signal (data not shown), leading to assignment of the intermediate as a high-spin Fe(IV) species [10]. FQ Mössbauer analysis has been used to detect similar Fe(IV) intermediate species in several other family representatives (e.g. [27–29, 58, 59]).
Fig. 6.
Mössbauer and XAS analyses of TauD. a Mössbauer spectra (4.2 K, 40 mT magnetic field) of TauD·Fe(II) or TauD·Fe(II)·2OG·taurine exposed to O2 for the times indicated. The separate line just above the 20 ms trace is a simulated spectrum of the reaction intermediate species. b Kinetics of formation and decay for the reaction intermediate from panel a. c Field-dependent changes to the Mössbauer spectrum of the reaction intermediate species at 50 mT or 1, 4, and 8 T. d FT of the Fe K-edge EXAFS data for the reaction intermediate (thick line) or anaerobic control sample (thin line). e Fourier-filtered EXAFS spectra of the reaction intermediate (thick lines) superimposed with selected fits (thin lines). Reprinted with permission from [10] (a and b), [56] (c), and [60] (d and e)
FQ trapping of the TauD reaction intermediate (at 79% abundance when using 2H-taurine as the substrate) also allowed for its analysis by XAS [60]. The Fe K-edge of the intermediate species (7,123 eV) and the intensity of the 1s → 3d transition were both significantly greater than for these features of the anaerobic sample, consistent with the accumulation of an Fe(IV) species containing a short Fe-O bond in the reaction sample. The FT of the extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) data (Fig. 6d) did not resolve a separate peak at short radius, but the Fourier filtered EXAFS results were only well fit by including a scattering shell at 1.62 Å, compatible with Fe-O bonding, in addition to scattering shells at 2.05 and probably 2.42 Å (Fig. 6e) [60]. XAS studies have been carried out with other family members (e.g. [61–63]), including the FQ trapping of reaction intermediates containing short Fe-O bonds for the CytC3 and SyrB2 halogenases (along with evidence for an Fe-Br bond in CytC3 that was reacted in the presence of bromide) [28, 64].
One other Mössbauer study of TauD is worthy of mention due to its novelty [65]. TauD·Fe(II)·2OG·taurine was treated with NO, similar to the EPR studies described in the earlier section, and the resulting TauD·{FeNO}7·2OG·taurine species was examined by Mössbauer analysis at several fields. As expected, the sample possesses a S = 3/2 ground state, δ = 0.69 mm s−1, and ΔEQ = −1.70 mm s−1 (not shown), similar to other {FeNO}7 complexes. In addition, the sample was subjected to cryoreduction to afford TauD·{FeNO}8·2OG·taurine; this was the first paramagnetic {FeNO}8 complex observed and is important because it is isoelectronic with {FeO2}8, the initial O2 adduct. This new species exhibited δ = 1.07 mm s−1 and ΔEQ = 2.39 mm s−1 (not shown), consistent with reduction of the high-spin Fe(III) to high-spin Fe(II) with the NO-ligand remaining NO− [65].
RR spectroscopy of TauD
Resonance Raman (RR) spectroscopy has been used to examine both anaerobic TauD containing the Fe(II)·2OG chromophore and the catalytic intermediates formed after oxygen addition to TauD·Fe(II)·2OG·taurine.
An anaerobic spinning cell was used to probe the RR vibrations associated with TauD·Fe(II)·2OG and TauD·Fe(II)·2OG·taurine (Fig. 7) [66]. On the basis of comparison to corresponding vibrations of model compounds, the RR shifts at 460 cm−1 and 1,686 cm−1 in TauD·Fe(II)·2OG are assigned to the Fe(II)·2OG chelate mode and the ν(C=O) of the keto carbonyl group, respectively, with both features displaying a downshift in H218O. The addition of taurine to the sample results in vibrations at 470 cm−1 and 1,688 cm−1, which also are downshifted in H218O. The magnitude of the 16O/18O isotopic shift of the 1,686 cm−1 mode is in agreement with the value obtained for model complexes and, therefore, this mode involves only the keto carbonyl oxygen. By contrast, the small magnitude of the isotopic shift observed for the 460 cm−1 mode (−9 cm−1) upon 16O/18O substitution indicates that it involves motion of multiple atoms. This vibration in model compounds is assigned to an Fe(II) chelate mode and involves both carboxyl and keto oxygen atoms, but only the latter atom undergoes exchange with the bulk water in TauD·Fe(II)·taurine (Fig. 7). The terminal water ligand of Fe(II) is excluded as a possible origin of the 460 cm−1 mode because the observed isotopic shift is much smaller than expected for an isolated diatomic Fe-O oscillator. Furthermore, a similar chelate mode is observed upon binding of taurine, where the terminal water is lost [52]. The concomitant 10 cm−1 upshift in Raman frequency is interpreted as arising from the conversion of 6-coordinate to 5-coordinate geometry [66]. No other vibrations attributable to the Fe(II)-OH(2) are detected in TauD·Fe(II)·2OG.
Fig. 7.

Static resonance Raman spectra of TauD·Fe(II). The Fe(II)·2OG chromophore was excited using the 568.2 nm laser line and scattering was collected using 90° geometry in an anaerobic spinning cell at room temperature: A, TauD apoprotein; B, TauD·Fe(II)·2OG; C, TauD·Fe(II)·2OG in H218O; D, TauD·Fe(II)·2OG·taurine; and E, TauD·Fe(II)·2OG·taurine in H218O. Vibrational assignments for TauD·Fe(II)·2OG (top) and TauD·Fe(II)·2OG·taurine (bottom) show the keto carbonyl stretching and chelate ring vibration modes, the site of isotopic labeling, and the loss of coordinated water upon taurine binding. The spectra were reprinted with permission from [66]
Transient oxygen-derived species that form during TauD catalysis were characterized by use of isotope-difference continuous-flow (CF) RR spectroscopy [67, 68]. Anaerobic samples of TauD·Fe(II)·2OG·taurine were actively mixed with 16O2, 18O2, or 16O18O mixed isotope-enriched oxygenated buffer and passed through a flow cell while collecting RR spectra (Fig. 8a). Spectra of each isotopomer were integrated across multiple alternating measurements and isotope-difference spectra were generated by subtracting the spectra obtained with 18O2 from those obtained with 16O2. Such subtraction cancels out all vibrations except for those involving atoms originating from O2 and oxygen isotope-sensitive species appear as derivative shifts (Fig. 8a). Time resolution was achieved by varying the flow rate and the physical volume between the mixing point and the probe laser beam. To accumulate sufficient Raman intensity using practically achievable amounts of protein sample, the rate of the reaction was decreased by using low temperature (−36 °C) in the presence of cryoprotectant in the sample buffer. To verify that the transient species with characteristic optical absorption at 320 nm was populated at these conditions in agreement with the conventional stopped-flow studies [10], in situ absorption spectra were acquired. Close similarity of the observed absorption spectra suggested that the reaction proceeds via the same transient species.
Fig. 8.
Time-resolved RR spectra of TauD. a Schematic diagram of the isotope-difference cryogenic CF system with its active mixing, including an in situ optical probe. Processing of the alternating isotope substitution to absolute and isotope-difference Raman spectra is illustrated underneath. b Time-resolved, isotope difference (16O2–18O2) spectra of oxygen-containing species of TauD obtained with 1H- and 2H-taurine at −36 °C (gray traces) and their quantitative analysis using global spectral regression (black traces). The ▲ and ◆ symbols indicate a laser plasma line and a major ethylene glycol peak, respectively. c Illustration of the use of 16O18O mixed oxygen isotope to distinguish between oxo and peroxo structures of reactive intermediates, whose 16O2/18O2 differences are similar. d Vibrational assignments of two major transient intermediates detected in TauD at −36 °C. Two alternative structures are shown for F3. Panel b was reprinted with permission from [68]
The initial transient isotope-difference RR spectrum of TauD reveals the vibration at 821/787 cm−1. Both the frequency and the magnitude of the 16O/18O isotopic shift support the formation of a transient ferryl species during TauD catalysis [67]. Follow-up studies confirm the presence of this intermediate (825/788 cm−1 labeled F4, Fig. 8b left) and directly probe its structure using 16O18O mixed oxygen isotope (Fig. 8c). The result conclusively shows that all detectable species in TauD contain a single oxygen atom, finalizing the assignment of the 825 cm−1 species as a ferryl intermediate and the observed frequency to its νFe=O mode. This assignment is further corroborated by the observed kinetic isotope effect of substrate deuteration. Careful internal calibration using solvent bands allowed us to detect an upshift in this mode to 827/790 cm−1, Fig. 8b, right) in the presence of 2H-taurine. By analogy with well-characterized heme enzymes, this upshift is attributed to direct interaction between the oxo group and the C1 hydrogen of the primary substrate [68].
Two new transient species are resolved in the TauD reaction at −36 °C. The most prominent species is observed at 578/555 cm−1 (labeled F3 in Fig. 8). It shows time-dependence, trailing that of F4, and is assigned to the catalytic successor of F4, although formation of this species is not yet resolved. The second and weaker species is detected at the exhaustion of F4 using global spectral regression analysis. It is characterized by an unusually small magnitude of the isotopic shift at 815/787 cm−1 and termed FX in Fig. 8. To understand the vibrational origin of this species, several isotopically-labeled models of possible products of the reaction were synthesized, of which only one – the metal-alkoxo complex – shows isotopic sensitivity comparable to FX in its frequency and magnitude of the 16O/18O downshift. Based on this similarity, the FX species is assigned to a putative Fe(II)-alkoxo species following oxygen rebinding to substrate radical; however, the mechanism for Raman enhancement of such a species requires further investigation.
The vibrational signature of the F3 species is the most intriguing among the transient Raman intermediates of TauD. First, the time-resolved Raman study shows that both F3 and FX exhibit lifetimes longer than that of F4 and that the kinetics of all three species are sensitive to substrate deuteration. In contrast, the time-dependencies of the Fe(IV) and Fe(II) Mössbauer species at room temperature do not suggest the existence of any additional steps between the two intermediates [10]. Because the time resolution of the rapid FQ method used in the Mössbauer study is at least as high as that in the CF Raman studies, it is unlikely that the F3 and F4 species are not detected by Mössbauer for this reason. Instead, these results suggest that the populations of F3 and FX species are temperature dependent and either are increased at low temperature due to the relatively high activation energies of F4→F3 and F3→FX steps or, in contrast, the activation energies are very low which may lead to their decay during FQ Mössbauer studies.
The second peculiarity of the F3 species is the lack of vibrational signature from the associated proton. The kinetic isotope effect of the reaction of Fe(IV)=O with taurine clearly supports a large tunneling component of hydrogen atom transfer over proton-coupled electron transfer [69–72]. Hydrogen atom transfer from C1 of taurine to Fe(IV)=O which should yield Fe(III)-OH. Yet, careful vibrational analysis shows no detectable sensitivity of the νFe-O of F3 to either bulk water or substrate deuteration. Three alternative scenarios can explain this disparity. First, the Fe(III)-oxo species could reasonably arise by deprotonation of an Fe(III)-OH, following hydrogen atom abstraction from substrate. The main contradiction to this mechanism is the consensus expectation of significant basic character of the Fe(III)-OH, although this expectation is based on only a few model complexes characterized under very different conditions [5]. Preliminary efforts to detect the Fe(III)-O(H) Raman mode directly have been hindered by a very small scattering cross-section due to the low molar absorptivity of the mono-nuclear non-heme iron center. This problem may be circumvented by redox-difference infrared (IR) spectroscopy, which allows one to detect redox-linked pKas from pH dependencies of experimentally measured redox potentials [73–75].
An alternative possibility involves an unusual geometry that renders the Fe(III)-OH proton Raman-invisible. Such a scenario is plausible if the Fe-O-H is highly distorted from a relaxed geometry. When this ligand bending angle approaches 90°, the vibrational contribution of the proton into the νFe-O stretching mode is minimized and the effect of 1H/2H substitution on the observed frequency becomes negligible or is reversed in the presence of a strong hydrogen bond [76–79]. Considering the direct interactions of Fe(IV)=O with the substrate proton and the unremarkably “normal” frequency of νFe(IV)=O in TauD, such steric hindrance appears to be unlikely [5]. The detectable population of the putative alkoxo species FX also argues against the oxo ligand in F3 being protonated. Alkoxides are highly sensitive to hydrolysis and the formation of spectroscopically detectable Fe-O-C species is plausible only if the alkoxo oxygen is not protonated. The hydroxy ligand in the precursor species (presumably F3) would yield a hydro-alkoxy bridge, followed by a rapid dissociation from the metal and the loss of an isotope-sensitive vibration. Lastly, the observed F3 species may belong to a different spin pathway, which is populated to detectable levels at reduced temperature. This possibility appears to be the least likely [5], yet it cannot be completely discounted until direct kinetic resolution between F3 and F4 species is achieved. Further studies are necessary to discern the identity of these species, but their observation by RR methods demonstrates the power of this approach.
Conclusions and Perspective
As demonstrated by this case study of TauD, the application of an array of spectroscopic methods can provide detailed insights into the properties of a 2OG oxygenase metallocenter during substrate binding and catalysis. Additional spectroscopic methods to probe the metallocenter, such as nuclear resonance vibrational spectroscopy [80, 81], have not yet been applied to this enzyme, but have been used for other family members [82]. Non-spectroscopic techniques further extend the significant information available on this enzyme. For example, structural information was obtained for TauD in various states by crystallographic analyses [52, 83]. Metal binding was examined by isothermal titration calorimetry [84]. 18O-kinetic isotope effect measurements were used to identify the first irreversible reaction of O2 activation, the step following Fe(III)-superoxo formation [85]. It also has proven useful to supplement these experimental results with computational approaches, such as quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics and density functional theory calculations [57, 86–93], and by comparison to biomimetic models [94, 95]. The combination of these diverse approaches has greatly enhanced our fundamental understanding of the TauD reaction, and such a range of methods applied to other enzymes is certain to provide keen insights into their reaction mechanisms.
Acknowledgments
Work in the authors’ laboratories on this topic was supported by the National Institutes of Health (GM096132 to D.A.P., GM054065 and RR15880 to J.M., and GM063584 to R.P.H.).
Abbreviations
- CD
Circular dichroism
- CF
Continuous flow
- cw
Continuous wave
- DOPA
Dihydroxyphenylalanine
- EPR
Electron paramagnetic resonance
- ESEEM
Electron spin echo envelope modulation
- EXAFS
Extended X-ray absorption fine structure
- FQ
Freeze quench
- FT
Fourier transform
- HYSCORE
Hyperfine sublevel correlation
- IR
Infrared
- LMCT
Ligand-to-metal charge-transfer
- MCD
Magnetic circular dichroism
- MLCT
Metal-to-ligand charge-transfer
- 2OG
2-Oxoglutarate
- RR
Resonance Raman
- SF
Stopped-flow
- TauD
Taurine:2OG dioxygenase
- UV
Ultraviolet
- XAS
X-ray absorption spectroscopy
References
- 1.Hausinger RP. In: 2-oxoglutarate-dependent oxygenases. Schofield CJ, Hausinger RP, editors. Royal Society of Chemistry; Cambridge, U.K: 2015. pp. 1–58. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wu L-F, Meng S, Tang G-L. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1864:453–470. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2016.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Martinez S, Hausinger RP. J Biol Chem. 2015;290:20702–20711. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R115.648691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Aik WS, Chowdhury R, Clifton IJ, Hopkinson RJ, Leissing T, McDonough MA, Nowak R, Schofield CJ, Walport LJ. In: 2-oxoglutarate-dependent oxygenases. Schofield CJ, Hausinger RP, editors. Royal Society of Chemistry; Cambridge, U.K: 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Proshlyakov DA, Hausinger RP. In: Iron-containing enzymes: Versatile catalysts of hydroxylation reactions in nature. Kumar D, de Visser SP, editors. Royal Society of Chemistry; Cambridge, U.K: 2011. pp. 67–87. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Eichhorn E, van der Ploeg JR, Kertesz MA, Leisinger T. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:23031–23036. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.37.23031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Grzyska PK, Hausinger RP, Proshlyakov DA. Anal Biochem. 2010;399:64–71. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2009.11.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ryle MJ, Padmakumar R, Hausinger RP. Biochemistry. 1999;38:15278–15286. doi: 10.1021/bi9912746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ryle MJ, Liu A, Muthukumaran RB, Ho RYN, Koehntop KD, McCracken J, Que L, Jr, Hausinger RP. Biochemistry. 2003;42:1854–1862. doi: 10.1021/bi026832m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Price JC, Barr EW, Tirupati B, Bollinger JM, Jr, Krebs C. Biochemistry. 2003;42:7497–7508. doi: 10.1021/bi030011f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Grzyska PK, Ryle MJ, Monterosso GR, Liu J, Ballou DP, Hausinger RP. Biochemistry. 2005;44:3845–3855. doi: 10.1021/bi048746n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Knauer SH, Hartl-Spiegelhauer O, Schwarzinger S, Hänzelmann P, Dobbek H. FEBS J. 2012;279:816–831. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2012.08473.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pavel EG, Zhou J, Busby RW, Gunsior M, Townsend CA, Solomon EI. J Am Chem Soc. 1998;120:743–753. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Simmons JM, Koslowski DJ, Hausinger RP. Exp Parasitol. 2010;124:453–458. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2009.11.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ryle MJ, Koehntop KD, Liu A, Que L, Jr, Hausinger RP. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:3790–3795. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0636740100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Koehntop KD, Marimanikkuppam S, Ryle MJ, Hausinger RP, Que L., Jr J Biol Inorg Chem. 2006;11:63–72. doi: 10.1007/s00775-005-0059-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Grzyska PK, Müller TA, Campbell MG, Hausinger RP. J Inorg Biochem. 2007;101:797–808. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2007.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Grzyska PK, Hausinger RP. Inorg Chem. 2007;46:10087–10092. doi: 10.1021/ic700383q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Liu A, Ho RYN, Que L, Jr, Ryle MJ, Phinney BS, Hausinger RP. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123:5126–5127. doi: 10.1021/ja005879x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Henshaw TF, Feig M, Hausinger RP. J Inorg Biochem. 2004;98:856–861. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2003.10.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chen Y-H, Comeaux LM, Eyles SJ, Knapp MJ. Chem Commun. 2008:4768–4770. doi: 10.1039/b809099h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yan W, Song H, Song F, Guo Y, Wu CH, Her AS, Pu Y, Wang S, Naowarojna N, Weitz A, Hendrich MP, Costello CE, Zhang L, Liu P, Zhang YJ. Nature. 2015;527:539–543. doi: 10.1038/nature15519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 23.Price JC, Barr EW, Hoffart LM, Krebs C, Bollinger JM., Jr Biochemistry. 2005;44:8138–8147. doi: 10.1021/bi050227c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Price JC, Barr EW, Glass TE, Krebs C, Bollinger JM., Jr J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:13008–13009. doi: 10.1021/ja037400h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.McCusker KP, Klinman JP. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:19791–19795. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910660106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.McCusker KP, Klinman JP. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:5114–5120. doi: 10.1021/ja909416z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hoffart LM, Barr EW, Guyer RB, Bollinger JM, Jr, Krebs C. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:14738–14743. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604005103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Matthews MM, Krest C, Barr EW, Vaillancourt F, Walsh CT, Green M, Krebs C, Bollinger JM., Jr Biochemistry. 2009;48:4331–4343. doi: 10.1021/bi900109z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Galonić DP, Barr EW, Walsh CT, Bollinger JM, Jr, Krebs C. Nat Chem Biol. 2007;3:113–116. doi: 10.1038/nchembio856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Solomon EI. Inorg Chem. 2001;40:3656–3669. doi: 10.1021/ic010348a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Solomon EI, Light KM, Liu LV, Srnec M, Wong SD. Acc Chem Res. 2013;46:2725–2739. doi: 10.1021/ar400149m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Solomon EI, Brunold TC, Davis MI, Kemsley JN, Lee S-K, Lehnert N, Neese F, Skulan AJ, Yang Y-S, Zhou J. Chem Rev. 2000;100:235–349. doi: 10.1021/cr9900275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Neidig ML, Brown CD, Light KM, Fujimori DG, Nolan EM, Price JC, Barr EW, Bollinger JM, Jr, Krebs C, Walsh CT, Solomon EI. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:14224–14231. doi: 10.1021/ja074557r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zhou J, Kelly WL, Bachmann BO, Gunsior M, Townsend CA, Solomon EI. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123:7388–7398. doi: 10.1021/ja004025+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kemsley JN, Mitic N, Zaleski L, Caradonna JP, Solomon EI. J Am Chem Soc. 1999;121:1528–1536. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chow MS, Eser BE, Wilson SA, Hodgson KO, Hedman B, Fitzpatrick PF, Solomon EI. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:7685–7698. doi: 10.1021/ja810080c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Enemark JH, Feltham RD. Coord Chem Rev. 1974;13:339–406. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Arciero DM, Lipscomb JD, Huynh BH, Kent TA, Münck E. J Biol Chem. 1983;258:14981–14991. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Orville AM, Chen VJ, Kriauciunas A, Harpel MR, Fox BG, Münck E, Lipscomb JD. Biochemistry. 1992;31:4602–4612. doi: 10.1021/bi00134a010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chen VJ, Orville AM, Harpel MR, Frolik CA, Surerus KK, Münck E, Lipscomb JD. J Biol Chem. 1989;264:21677–21681. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Rocklin AM, Tierney DL, Kofman V, Brunhuber NMW, Hoffman BM, Christoffersen RE, Reich NO, Lipscomb JD, Que L., Jr Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:7905–7909. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.14.7905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Tierney DL, Rocklin AM, Lipscomb JD, Que L, Jr, Hoffman B. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:7005–7013. doi: 10.1021/ja0500862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yang TC, Wolfe MD, Neibergall MB, Mekmouche Y, Lipscomb JD, Hoffman BM. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:7056–7066. doi: 10.1021/ja0214126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Brown CA, Pavlovsky MA, Westre TE, Zhang Y, Hedman B, Hodgson KO, Solomon EI. J Am Chem Soc. 1995;117:715–732. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Aquino F, Rodriguez JH. J Phys Chem A. 2009;113:9150–9156. doi: 10.1021/jp8107667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Muthukumaran RB, Grzyska PK, Hausinger RP, McCracken J. Biochemistry. 2007;46:5951–5959. doi: 10.1021/bi700562t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.McCracken J. Meth Enzymol. 2015;563:285–309. doi: 10.1016/bs.mie.2015.06.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Casey TM, Grzyska PK, Hausinger RP, McCracken J. J Phys Chem B. 2013;117:10384–10394. doi: 10.1021/jp404743d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Stoll S, Britt RD. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2009;11:6614–6625. doi: 10.1039/b907277b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Stoll S, Schweiger A. J Magn Res. 2006;178:42–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2005.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Krzyaniak MD, Eser BE, Ellis HR, Fitzpatrick PF, McCracken J. Biochemistry. 2013;52:8430–8441. doi: 10.1021/bi4010914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Elkins JM, Ryle MJ, Clifton IJ, Dunning Hotopp JC, Lloyd JS, Burzlaff NI, Baldwin JE, Hausinger RP, Roach PL. Biochemistry. 2002;41:5185–5192. doi: 10.1021/bi016014e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Shane JJ, Höfer P, Reijerse EJ, de Boer E. J Magn Res. 1992;99:596–604. [Google Scholar]
- 54.McCracken J, Cappillino PJ, McNally JS, Krzyaniak MD, Howart M, Tarves PC, Caradonna JP. Inorg Chem. 2015;54:6486–6497. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b00788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.McCracken J, Eser BE, Mannikko D, Krzyaniak MD, Fitzpatrick PF. Biochemistry. 2015;54:3759–3771. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Krebs C, Price JC, Baldwin J, Saleh L, Green MT, Bollinger JM., Jr Inorg Chem. 2005;44:742–757. doi: 10.1021/ic048523l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Sinnecker S, Svensen N, Barr EW, Ye S, Bollinger JM, Jr, Neese F, Krebs C. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:6168–6179. doi: 10.1021/ja067899q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Chang W-c, Guo Y, Wang C, Butch SE, Rosenzweig AC, Boal AK, Krebs C, Bollinger JM., Jr Science. 2014;343:1140–1144. doi: 10.1126/science.1248000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Chang W-c, Li J, Lee JL, Cronican AA, Guo Y. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138:10390–10393. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b05400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Riggs-Gelasco PJ, Price JC, Guyer RB, Brehm JH, Barr EW, Bollinger JM, Jr, Krebs C. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:8108–8109. doi: 10.1021/ja048255q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Cosper NJ, Stälhandske CMV, Saari RE, Hausinger RP, Scott RA. J Biol Inorg Chem. 1999;4:122–129. doi: 10.1007/s007750050295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Giri NC, Sung H, Chen H, Costa M, Maroney MJ. Biochemistry. 2011;50:5067–5076. doi: 10.1021/bi101668x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Lloyd MD, Lee H-J, Harlos K, Zhang Z-H, Baldwin JE, Schofield CJ, Charnock JM, Garner CD, Hara T, Terwisscha Van Scheltinga AC, Valegård K, Viklund JAC, Hajdu J, Andersson I, Danielsson A, Bhikhabhai R. J Molec Biol. 1999;287:943–960. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Fujimori DG, Barr EW, Matthews ML, Koch GM, Yonce JR, Walsh CT, Bollinger JM, Jr, Krebs C, Riggs-Gelasco PJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:13408–13409. doi: 10.1021/ja076454e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ye S, Price JC, Barr EW, Green MT, Bollinger JM, Jr, Krebs C, Neese F. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:4739–4751. doi: 10.1021/ja909715g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Ho RYN, Mehn MP, Hegg EL, Liu A, Ryle MA, Hausinger RP, Que L., Jr J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123:5022–5029. doi: 10.1021/ja0041775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Proshlyakov DA, Henshaw TF, Monterosso GR, Ryle MJ, Hausinger RP. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:1022–1023. doi: 10.1021/ja039113j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Grzyska PK, Appelman EH, Hausinger RP, Proshlyakov DA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:3982–3987. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911565107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Bell RP. The tunnel effect in chemistry. Chapman & Hall; London, U.K: 1980. [Google Scholar]
- 70.Krishtalik LI. Charge transfer in reactions in electrochemical and chemical processes. Plenum; New York, N.Y: 1979. [Google Scholar]
- 71.Kuznetsov AM, Ulstrup J. In: Isotope effects in chemistry and biology. Cohen A, Limbach H-H, editors. CRC Press; Boca Raton: 2006. pp. 691–724. [Google Scholar]
- 72.Mayer JM. Acc Chem Res. 2011;44:36–46. doi: 10.1021/ar100093z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Brischwein M, Scharf B, Engelhard M, Mäntele W. Biochemistry. 1993;32:13710–13717. doi: 10.1021/bi00212a041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Hirst J. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1757:225–239. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2006.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Costentin C, Robert M, Saveant JM. Chem Rev. 2010;110:PR1–PR40. doi: 10.1021/cr100038y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Sitter AJ, Reczek CM, Terner J. J Biol Chem. 1985;260:7515–7522. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Hashimoto S, Teraoka J, Inubushi T, Yonetani T, Kitagawa T. J Biol Chem. 1986;261:11110–11118. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Proshlyakov DA, Ogura T, Shinzawa-Itoh K, Yoshikawa S, Appelman EH, Kitagawa T. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:29385–29388. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Ogo S, Yamahara R, Roach M, Suenobu T, Aki M, Ogura T, Kitagawa T, Masuda H, Fukuzumi S, Watanabe Y. Inorg Chem. 2002;41:5513–5520. doi: 10.1021/ic0200040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Wang H, Alp EE, Yoda Y, Cramer SP. Meth Molec Biol. 2014;1122:125–137. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-794-5_9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Sage JT, Paxson C, Wyllie GRA, Sturhahn W, Durbin SM, Champion PM, Alp EE, Scheidt WR. J Phys: Condens Matter. 2001;13:7707–7722. [Google Scholar]
- 82.Wong SD, Srnec M, Matthews ML, Liu LV, Kwak Y, Park K, Bell CB, III, Alp EE, Zhao J, Yoda Y, Kitao S, Seto M, Krebs C, Bollinger JM, Jr, Solomon EI. Nature. 2013;499:320–323. doi: 10.1038/nature12304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.O’Brien JR, Schuller DJ, Yang VS, Dillard BD, Lanzilotta WN. Biochemistry. 2003;42:5547–5554. doi: 10.1021/bi0341096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Henderson KL, Müller TA, Hausinger RP, Emerson JP. Inorg Chem. 2015;54:2278–2283. doi: 10.1021/ic502881q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Mirica LM, McCusker KP, Munos JW, Liu H-w, Klinman JP. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:8122–8123. doi: 10.1021/ja800265s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.de Visser SP. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:9813–9824. doi: 10.1021/ja061581g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.de Visser SP. Chem Commun. 2007:171–173. doi: 10.1039/b611273k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Godfrey E, Porro CS, de Visser SP. J Phys Chem A. 2008;112:2464–2468. doi: 10.1021/jp710999v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.De Visser SP, Quesne MG, Martin CB, Comba P, Ryde U. Chem Commun. 2014;50:262–282. doi: 10.1039/c3cc47148a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Borowski T, Bassan A, Siegbahn PEM. Chem Eur J. 2004;10:1031–1041. doi: 10.1002/chem.200305306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Shaik S, Hirao H, Kumar D. Acc Chem Res. 2007;40:532–542. doi: 10.1021/ar600042c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Cho K-B, Hirao H, Shaik S, Nam W. Chem Soc Rev. 2016;45:1197–1210. doi: 10.1039/c5cs00566c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Geng C, Ye S, Neese F. Dalton Trans. 2014;43:6079–6086. doi: 10.1039/c3dt53051e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Allpress CJ, Kleespies ST, Que L., Jr . In: 2-oxoglutarate-dependent oxygenases. Schofield CJ, Hausinger RP, editors. Royal Society of Chemistry; Cambridge, UK: 2015. pp. 123–148. [Google Scholar]
- 95.Puri M, Que L., Jr Acc Chem Res. 2015;48:2443–245202. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]






