Abstract
Introduction
S100B protein, which helps nerve development and differentiation, is produced by astrocytes and can be detected in peripheral circulation after brain damage. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between the serum S100B protein level and the infarction volume and clinical outcome and also the early prognostic role of serum S100B protein in patients with ischemic stroke.
Method
Fifty patients admitted in the first 24-hour period of acute ischemic stroke were evaluated prospectively, and the findings were compared to those of the controls (n=26). S100B levels of the patients and neurological findings on days 1, 3, and 5 and their functional outcomes on the discharge day and at the first month were recorded by the same examiner.
Results
S100B levels were not affected by sex, age, or concomitant systemic diseases. The maximum levels of S100B were recorded on the 3rd day, and there was a correlation between infarct size and S100B levels. No correlation between the severity of stroke and S100B level was found. There was a poor correlation between the functional outcomes of the patients at the 1st month and S100B levels and on the 3rd day.
Conclusion
The detection of high S100B levels in peripheral circulation after acute ischemic stroke and the correlations of S100B levels with infarct size (good) and disability (poor) imply that S100B protein may be used as a peripheral marker in acute ischemic stroke patients.
Keywords: Brain, cerebrovascular disorders, biological markers, prognosis
Introduction
Stroke is one of the leading causes of death in developed countries and ranks first among diseases causing disability (1,2). The incidence of stroke increases with age, and 80% of them are due to ischemia (3).
Among the family of non-ubiquitous Ca2+-modulated proteins, S100B is mainly produced by astrocytes. S100B plays an important role in nerve growth, differentiation, and reparation of nerves (4,5,6,7). While it originates a protective effect at physiologic levels, after excretion from the cell, elevated extracellular concentrations lead to cell damage, which can be involved in the pathophysiology of neurodegenerative processes (6,8). During brain damage, S100B spreads easily to the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and also to the blood (5,6). Increased S100B levels secondary to trauma and various ischemic conditions were reported in several studies (9,10,11). Recently, biochemical markers have gained importance in the identification of brain injury.
In this study, S100B levels were assessed in patients with ischemic stroke, and the relationship with the infarct size, localization, stroke severity, and clinical outcomes were evaluated.
Method
In this study, 50 acute ischemic stroke patients, admitted within the first 24 hours of the stroke onset, were evaluated in a period of 6 months (May 2011–October 2011). Control subjects consisted of 26 healthy age- and sex-matched groups. Patients who were admitted 24 hours after stroke onset; suffering from stroke secondary to trauma, tumor, infection; diagnosed with brain tumor or systemic malignancy, transient ischemic attacks, epidural, subdural or subarachnoid hemorrhage; and patients with a history of head trauma or acute myocardial infarction within the last 3 months were excluded from the study.
The patients’ age, sex, comorbid risk factors, radiological findings, and neurological examinations on the 1st, 3rd and 5th days of the stroke onset were recorded. Neurological examinations on the 1st, 3rd, and 5th days of stroke onset were recorded by NIHSS (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale). NIHSS score was classified as 0–1: normal, 2–7: mild, 8–14: moderate, 15 and higher: severe (12,13).
In the 1st, 3rd, and 5th days following stroke onset, 5 ml blood sampling was performed from the antecubital vein into flat vacutainers with gel separator tubes. After a rest at room temperature for about 20 minutes in order to obtain complete coagulation, serum was separated after 10 minutes of centrifugation at 4000 rpm. The serum samples were stored in Eppendorf tubes at −80°C until assessment. The results were recorded in pg/ml after analyzing the samples according to the protocol of the kit by using the sandwich enzyme immunoassay method and the Human S100B ELISA kit (S100B; BioVendor Research and Diagnostic Products, Brno, Chezch Republic)
Stroke subtypes were grouped as TACI (total anterior circulation infarct), PACI (partial anterior circulation infarct), POCI (posterior circulation infarct), and LACI (lacunar infarct) according to the classification of OCSP (Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project) (14).
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed by a 1.5-Tesla field-strength (MAGNETOM Avanto; Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) device. Infarct volume was calculated by slice thickness of 5 mm in the axial plane and gap between cross-sections of 1.5 mm in diffusion-weighted sequences. Patients were divided into two disability groups according to the modified Rankin scores (mRS) performed during hospital discharge and at the first month of the event: normal-mild and moderate-to-severe (15). The control group consisted of 26 sex- and age-matched individuals, taking in consideration the exclusion criteria. Serum S100B levels were measured intentionally only once.
Study was approved by the ethics committee of Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital on 12/19/2011 with protocol number 2011/120.
Statistical Analysis
The Number Cruncher Statistical System (NCSS) 2007 Statistical Software (Utah, USA) package program was used. For the evaluation of data, descriptive statistical methods (mean, standard deviation), Friedman test for repeated measurements of multiple groups, Kruskal-Wallis test for comparison of multiple groups, Mann-Whitney U-test for comparison of two groups, Spearman correlation test for correlation, and Fisher’s exact chi-square test for comparison of qualitative data were used.
Results
Fifty patients, 24 men (48%) and 26 women (52%), with ages between 40 and 98 years (68±13 years), were enrolled in the study. Patients were divided into groups according to the localization and size of the lesions: 2 cases of TACI (4%), 21 cases of PACI (42%), 27 cases of POCI (54%).
Four patients died during their admission (2 POCI, 1 TACI, 1 PACI), and S100B measurements of these patients could not be completed. One patient died because of acute coronary syndrome within the first month and was excluded from the first-month disability examination. Serial measurements of S100B of 11 patients could not be completed due to various reasons (4 exitus patients, early discharge of 7 patients who were lost to follow-up).
There was no statistical difference between the S100B levels of male and female patients on the 1st, 3rd, and 5th days. Eighty-two percent of hypertension (HT), 56% of diabetes mellitus (DM), 36% of coronary artery disease (CAD), and 34% of hyperlipidemia (HL) cases were detected in ischemic stroke patients, and S100B levels were not affected by these common systemic risk factors (Table 1).
Table 1.
S100B(pg/ml) | |||
---|---|---|---|
1st day | 3rd day | 5th day | |
Female( n=26) | 165.5±156.9 | 204±237.4 | 197.5±276.9 |
Male (n=24) | 265.6±506.6 | 384.5±696 | 324±508.8 |
P | .872 | .991 | .869 |
HT (+) (n=41) | 219.7±242.9 | 410.4±670.3 | 386.2±610.8 |
HT (−) (n=9) | 492.8±887.5 | 333.1±315.3 | 283.3±305.9 |
P | .087 | .739 | .631 |
DM (+) (n=28) | 190.2±257.4 | 303.7±391.5 | 292.9±412.3 |
DM (−) (n=22) | 368.9±578.5 | 525.4±832.6 | 443.6±686.8 |
P | .150 | .233 | .404 |
HL (+) (n=17) | 364.4±705.6 | 546.8±797 | 509.9±605 |
HL (−) (n=33) | 219.7±177.6 | 314.4±488.5 | 280.2±516.8 |
P | .268 | .226 | .219 |
CAD (+) (n=18) | 169.8±156.4 | 489.6±779.1 | 546.8±801.6 |
CAD (−) (n=32) | 324.5±524.3 | 344.9±514.9 | 259.2±325.6 |
P | .230 | .453 | .121 |
HT: hypertension, DM: diabetes mellitus, CAD: coronary artery disease,
HL:hyperlipidemia, (+): Present, (−): absent, p>0.05 not significant
Alteration of S100B levels did not show any significant differences between the 1st to 3rd days and the 1st to 5th days (p=.113 and p=.548). S100B values of the 3rd day were significantly higher than S100B values of the 5th day (p=.017). The S100B levels of stroke patients were respectively as follows: the 1st day [median (min–max)=112.5 (51–2815)], the 3rd day [median (min–max)=123 (53–2913)], and the 5th day [median (min–max)=105 (50–2544)] pg/ml (Fr=7.74, p=.021). There was no statistical difference between the mild and moderate-severe groups of percentage variations of the 3rd and 5th day S100B levels according to the 1st day (Table 2).
Table 2.
S100B | 1st day – 3rd day Change median (min–max) |
1st day – 5th day Change median (min–max) |
---|---|---|
Mild | n=28 −.02 (−.89 – 17.32) |
n=18 .03 (−.90 – 13.67) |
Medium-Severe | n=32 .39 (−.63 – 9.92) |
n=7 −.27 (−.60 – 36.41) |
p | 0260 | .900 |
p>.05 not significant
Also, no statistically significant difference was found in S100B levels of the 1st, 3rd, and 5th days between anterior system (TACI and PACI) and posterior system (POCI) strokes (Table 3).
Table 3.
S100B | Anterior system (n=23) | Posterior system (n=27) | MW | p | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st day | mean±SD | 224.6±287.7 | 306.6±530.1 | ||
median (min–max) | 99 (61–257) | 131 (68–398) | 286.5 | .640 | |
3rd day | mean±SD | 311.2±420.8 | 465.88±741.6 | ||
median (min–max) | 119 (9.5–374) | 151 (79–517) | 251 | .800 | |
5th day | mean±SD | 286.6±409.1 | 42105±646.92 | 156 | .380 |
median (min–max) | 105 (70–441) | 61.5 (51.8–116.3) | |||
Fr | 7.18 | 1.91 | |||
p | 0.028 | 0.385 |
SD: Standard deviation, p>0.05 not significant, MW: Mann-Whitney U-test,
Fr: Friedman test
Serum S100B levels on the 3rd and 5th days, especially on the 3rd day, were well correlated with infarct volume (p=.0001 and p=.0001), and there was a weak correlation between the first-month mRS score and S100B levels of the 3rd day (p=.03) (Table 4). There was no significant relationship between the concurrent NIHS scores and S100B levels (day 1, day 3, day 5) (p=.440, p=.736, p=.440).
Table 4.
S100B (pg/ml) | Infarct volume mm3 (13.940±20.629) | mRS DH | mRS 1st month | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
p | p | P | |||
1st day | mean±SD median | 268.8±433.6 | .4 | .202 | .093 |
(min–max) | 112.5 (51–2815) | ||||
3rd day | mean±SD median | 395.3±614.9 | .0001 | .841 | .03 |
(min–max) | 123 (53–2913) | ||||
5th day | mean±SD median | 362.4±553.5 | .0001 | .095 | .059 |
(min–max) | 105 (50–2544) |
mRS: modified Rankin Scale, DH: Discharging of Hospital
All S100B level measurements showed significantly higher values than the control group (1st day, 3rd day, 5th day) (p=.0001, p=.0001, p=.002).
Conclusion
Recently, many research studies were conducted in order to identify the post-stroke damage rate and to estimate its effect on the disease prognosis (16). Neurological examination or repeated neuroimaging might not be sufficient when cooperation with the patient cannot be established or if the patient is in a coma state. In these circumstances, the presence of a marker that can be monitored in serum would provide a convenience. One of the neurobiochemicals recently researched is S100B, a complicated neuroglia interaction-modulating protein (17,18,19). The correlation between lesion size and serum levels of this protein and also the relationship of it with the early clinical and/or functional outcome in acute post-stroke patients were reported in several studies.
In a study conducted by Beer et al. (20), serum S100B protein concentrations of 57 acute ischemic stroke patients, admitted to the hospital within 96 hours, showed a correlation to the grade of systemic inflammation regardless of the ischemic lesion size. Abraha et al. compared 68 ischemic stroke patients to 51 controls and found that the serum S100B levels of the patients were higher than that of the controls due to the size of infarction in TACI and lower in lacunar infarcts. In the same study, functional outcomes of the patients were evaluated by Barthel scale and mRS at the third month, and it was reported that the outcomes were compatible with S100B levels in acute phase (16). Missler et al. have reached similar conclusions in their study including 44 ischemic stroke patients (21). In our study, the highest serum S100B levels, especially on the third day, correlated well with the infarct volume, and this result led us to think that serum S100B levels show the width of brain injury and can be used as a peripheral marker.
In many studies, it is reported that the time needed to reach maximum levels of S100B protein, which also has increased levels after traumatic brain injury and hypoxic conditions, is longer in infarction, and it reaches its maximum level 2–3 days later in acute ischemic stroke (10,18,22,23,24,25,26). Weglews et al. showed in their study including 53 patients with ischemic and 14 with hemorrhagic stroke that in serial measurements, serum S100B concentrations reached the highest levels during the third day in ischemic stroke patients but on the first day in hemorrhagic stroke patients (27). In our study, consistent with the literature, there were significant differences of S100B levels on the third and fifth days, reaching the highest levels on the 3rd day. However, when comparing the percentage variation of the third and fifth days of S100B values to that of the first day, no significant difference was found between the mild and moderate-severe groups. Unlike other studies, we detected approximately the same high S100B levels during the first and the third day, and we assume that late (end of the first day) admission time of the patients to the hospital or not precisely specifying the time might result in progression of inflammation in the necrosis area. The measurements of the highest S100B levels on the third day might be related to the edema effect occurring 2–3 days after ischemic infarct, with a large number of astrocytes undergoing necrosis and progression of inflammation, triggering the deterioration in the blood-brain barrier.
In the Middelheim Multidisciplinary Stroke Study, it was reported that cerebrospinal fluid S100B protein levels of 89 strokes patients (68 ischemic strokes, 21 transient ischemic attacks) obtained at admission (average 8 hours) and 35 healthy volunteers were in association with infarct volume, stroke severity (NIHSS), and the outcome (3-month mRS) (28). Kenangil et al. showed that S100B values of 26 acute stroke patients, assessed on the 1st, 3rd, and 7th days, reached maximum levels in patients with infarcts larger than 2/3 of the middle cerebral artery territory on the 3rd day, and they indicated these findings as poor outcome and disability (25).
Elting et al. compared the relationship of S100B protein levels with clinical findings in 21 ischemic stroke, 18 transient ischemic attack, and 10 traumatic brain injury patients to that of 28 healthy controls. A correlation between the highest S100B levels measured on the 3rd day and NIHS scores of the 1st and 10th days was found. In trauma patients, the highest S100B levels were detected during the first day, and a correlation was distinguished with the Glasgow coma scales during admission and at the 6-month follow-up (26).
In the study conducted by Buttner et al., serum S100B protein levels were measured at 12 hours, 24 hours, and 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, and 10 days in 26 patients with anterior circulation infarction, and clinical state and post-stroke 4-week functional impairment were scored with the mRS, and the results were compared to 26 healthy controls. The highest levels of S100B were measured on the 2nd and 3rd days after the onset of symptoms in patients with larger infarctions and higher neurological deficits during admission, but no association was found between these higher values and prognosis (24). In two separate studies, Wunderlich et al. detected a strong correlation between neurological conditions and serum S100B concentrations in ischemic stroke patients and stated that it has a high predictive value in estimating early prognosis (23,29). In the Fassbender et al. study, it was expressed that S100 protein levels were correlated with infarct size in ischemic stroke, and furthermore, its concentrations measured on the 10th, 24th, and 72nd hours were well correlated to the patient’s neurologic status (30).
In our study, a correlation between infarct size and the increase of S100B levels was observed but not between the stroke severity (by NIHSS) and levels of S100B. Consequently, we concluded that stroke severity or the clinical situation is related not only to the amount of neurons undergoing necrosis but also to the critical localizations of necrosis, as well. Foerch et al. measured S100B levels of 39 patients with MCA infarcts who reached the hospital within the first 6 hours at the 48th and 72nd hours and found a relationship with the functional outcome at 6 months and also with infarct volume. They concluded that S100B values measured at the 48th and 72nd hours in nonlacunar MCA infarcts are the most important predictive measurements to estimate the functional outcome and infarct volume (31).
Hermann et al. evaluated 32 patients with anterior circulation ischemia and found that S100B serum concentrations were associated with the size of brain lesions, neurologic status, and early functional outcome of the patients. A continuous rise of S100B until the 4th day was detected in all patients. During the 2nd and 3rd day, S100B levels reached their peak levels. In patients with lacunar infarcts, S100B did not pass the limit value of 0.12 mg/L; in those with PACI, a minimal increase was detected; and in TACI, S100B values reached 18 times the peak values. In conclusion, S100B secretion showed a good correlation with the size of the infarction. They reported that measurement of serum S100B after acute ischemia could be useful in therapeutic interventions and monitoring (19).
In our study, the detection of a weak correlation between the functional status at the first month and the highest S100B levels on the 3rd day led us to think of S100B as a nonsufficient prognostic marker. Another finding was that gender factor and concomitant systemic diseases, such as DM, HT, and HL, in ischemic stroke patients have no effect on S100B levels. This finding may imply that S100B can specifically show the brain damage.
As a conclusion, high S100B protein levels in the peripheral circulation after ischemic stroke were detected and well correlation with the size of infarction, but a weak correlation with disabilities was found. Even if S100B protein might not be as sufficient in the prediction of the prognosis in head trauma, it could be used as a marker showing brain damage in peripheral blood during ischemic stroke.
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest: The authors reported no conflict of interest related to this article.
References
- 1.Hankey GJ. Stroke how large a public health problem and how can the neurologist help? Arch Neurol. 1999;56:748–754. doi: 10.1001/archneur.56.6.748. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archneur.56.6.748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yalçın A. Stroke risk in elderly individuals: Novel molecules in stroke&therapeutical targets. Turkiye klinikleri J Med Sci. 2009;29:72–75. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Murray CJ, Lopez AD. global mortality, disability the contribution of risk factor: Global burder of the disease study. Lancet. 1997;349:1436–1442. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07495-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736%2896%2907495-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dönder E, Özkan Y, Gençer V, Baydaş G. The effect of experimentally induced maternal hypotyroidism on gfap and S100B protein expression in fetal brain tissue on tenth and fifteenth gestational days in newborn period. Turkiye klinikleri J Med Sci. 2010;30:462–468. http://dx.doi.org/10.5336/medsci.2008-8325. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kaca-Orynska M, Tomasiuk R, Friedman A. Neuron-specific enolase and S100B protein as predictors of outcome in ischaemic stroke. neurol neurochir pol. 2010;44:459–463. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3843(14)60136-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Donato R. İntracellular and extracellular roles of S100 proteins. microscopy research and technique. 2003;60:540–551. doi: 10.1002/jemt.10296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jemt.10296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Adami C, Sorci G, Blasi E, Agneletti AL, Bistoni F, Donato R. S100B expression in and effects on microjlia. Glia. 2001;33:131–142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1098-1136%28200102%2933:2%3C131::AID-GLIA1012%3E3.0.CO%3B2-D. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Donato R. S100: A multigenic family of calcium-modulated proteins of the EF-hand type with intracellular and extracellular functional roles. International journal of biochemistry & cell biology. 2001;33:637–668. doi: 10.1016/s1357-2725(01)00046-2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1357-2725%2801%2900046-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Raabe A, Kopetsch O, Woszczyk A, Lang J, Gerlach R, Zimmermann M, Seifert V. serum S-100B protein as a molecular marker in severe traumatic brain injury. restorative neurology and neuroscience. 2003;21:159–169. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Raabe A, Grolms C, Sorge O, Zimmermann M. Serum S-100B protein in severe head injury. Neurosurgery. 1999;45:477–483. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199909000-00012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199909000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rothermundt M, Peters M, Preehn JH, Arolt O. S100B in brain damage and neurodegenaration. Microsc res tech. 2003;60:614–632. doi: 10.1002/jemt.10303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jemt.10303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Park YW, Koh EJ, Choi HY. Correlation between serum D-Dimer level and volume in acute ischemic stroke. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2011;50:89–94. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2011.50.2.89. http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2011.50.2.89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.DeGraba TJ, Hallenbeck JM, Pettigrew KD, Dutka AJ, Kelly BJ. proggression in acute stroke. Value of the initial NIH stroke scale score on patients stratification in future Trials. Stroke. 1999;30:1208–1212. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.6.1208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.30.6.1208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Asdaghi N, Jeerakathil T, Hameed B, Saini M, McCombe JA, Shuaib A, Emery D, Butcher K. Oxfordshire community stroke project classification poorly differentiates small cortical and subcortical infarcts. Stroke. 2011;42:2143–2148. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.613752. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.613752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Umay EK, Gürçay E, Ünlü E, Ekşioğlu E, Çakcı A. Functional and nutritional effects of dysphagia in early stroke patients. Turkiye klinikleri J Med Sci. 2010;30:925–931. http://dx.doi.org/10.5336/medsci.2008-9549. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Abraha HD, Butterworth J, Bath PM, Wassif WS, Garthwaite J, Sherwood RA. Serum S100 Protein, Relationship to clinical outcome in acute stroke. Ann clin biochem. 1997;34:546–550. doi: 10.1177/000456329703400510. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000456329703400510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Raabe A, Grolms C, Keller M, Döhnert J, Sorge O, Seifert V. Correlation of computed tomography findings and serum brain damage markers following severe head injury. Acta neurochir. 1998;140:787–791. doi: 10.1007/s007010050180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s007010050180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bertsch T, Cassarin W, Kretechmar M, Zimmer W, Walter S, Sommer C. Protein S100B: A serum marker for ischemic and infectious injury of cerebral tissue. Clin chem lab med. 2001;39:319–323. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2001.050. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2001.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hermann M, Vos P, Wunderlich MT, Brujin CH, Lamers KJ. Release of glial tissue - Specific proteins after acute stroke: A comparative analysis of serum concentrations of protein S100B and glial fibrillary acidic protein. Stroke. 2000;31:2670–2677. doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.11.2670. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.31.11.2670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Beer C, Blacker D, Bynevelt M, Hankey GJ, Puddey IB. Systemic markers of inflammation are independently associated with S100B concentration: Results of an observational study in subjects with acute ischemic stroke. Journal of neuroinflammation. 2010;7:71–76. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-7-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-2094-7-71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Missler U, Wiesmann M, Friedrich C, Kaps M. S100 protein and neuron specific enolase concentrations in blood as indicators of infarction and prognosis in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1997;28:1956–1960. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.10.1956. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.28.10.1956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kim JS, Yoon SS, Kim YH, Ryu JS. Serial measurement of interleukin-6, transforming growth factor-β and S-100 protein in patients with acute stroke. Stroke. 1996;27:1553–1557. doi: 10.1161/01.str.27.9.1553. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.27.9.1553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wunderlich MT, Ebert AD, Kratz T, Goertler M, Jost S, Herrmann M. Early neuro behavioral outcome after stroke is related to release of neurobiochemical markers of brain damage. Stroke. 1999;30:1190–1995. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.6.1190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.30.6.1190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Buttner T, Weyers S, Postert T, Sprengelmeyer R, Kuhn W. S100 Protein: Serum marker of focal brain damage after ischemic territorial MCA infarction. Stroke. 1997;28:1961–1965. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.10.1961. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.28.10.1961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kenangil G, Yalçın DA, Haklar G, Cacina H, Forta H. relation of serum S-100 protein to infarct size and clinical prognosis. Marmara Medical Journal. 2004;17:105–108. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Elting JW, de Jager AEJ, Teelken AW, Scaaf MJ, Maurits NM, van der Naalt J, Sibinga CT, Sulter GA, de Keyser J. Comparison of serum S100 protein levels following stroke and travmatic brain injury. J Neurol Sci. 2000;181:104–110. doi: 10.1016/s0022-510x(00)00442-1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-510X%2800%2900442-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Weglewski A, Ryglewicz D, Mular A, Jugnczyk J. changes of protein S100B serum concentration during ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke in relation to the volume of stroke lesion. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2005;39:310–317. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Brouns R, De Vil B, Cras P, De surgeloose D, Marien P, De Deyn PP. neurobiochemical markers of brain damage in cerebrospinal fluid of acute ischemic stroke patients. Clin Chem. 2010;56:451–458. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2009.134122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2009.134122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wunderlich TM, Wallesch CW, Goertler M. Release of neurobiochemical markers of brain damage is related to the neurovascular status on admission and the site of arterial occlusion in acute ischemic stroke. Journal of the neurological Sci. 2004;227:49–53. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2004.08.005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2004.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Fassbender K, Schmidt R, Schreiner A, Fatar M, Mühlhauser F, Daffertshofer M, Hennerici M. Leakage of brain - originated proteins in periphenal blood: Temporal profile and diagnostic value in early ischemic stroke. J Neurol Sci. 1997;148:101–105. doi: 10.1016/s0022-510x(96)05351-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-510X%2896%2905351-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Foerch C, Singer OC, Neumann-Haefelin T, Rochemont R, Steinmetz H, Sitzer M. Evaluation of serum S100B as a surrogate marker for long-term outcome and infarct volume in acute middle cerebral artery infarction. Arch neurol. 2005;62:1130–1134. doi: 10.1001/archneur.62.7.1130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archneur.62.7.1130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]