Skip to main content
BMJ Case Reports logoLink to BMJ Case Reports
. 2017 Mar 3;2017:bcr2016218744. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2016-218744

Extraskeletal orbital mesenchymal chondrosarcoma: surgical approach and mini review

Ashish Jakhetiya 1, Nootan Kumar Shukla 1, Dillip Muduly 1, Shashank S Kale 2
PMCID: PMC5353534  PMID: 28258179

Abstract

Extraskeletal orbital mesenchymal chondrosarcoma (MC) is an extremely rare and highly aggressive tumour. It has characteristic radiological features and pathognomic histological biphasic pattern. Radical resection with negative margins is the mainstay of treatment; role of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy is yet not well defined. We report a rare case of 18-year-old man who was diagnosed to have orbital MC. He presented with locally advanced disease with no vision in the affected eye. He underwent right orbital exenteration; a transcranial intradural approach was used to divide the optic nerve, and the temporalis muscle flap was utilised to fill the exenterated orbit. Though optic nerve involvement is rare in orbital MCs, a transcranial approach may be used effectively to avoid traction on optic chiasma and ensure margin-free resection in case of optic nerve involvement up to orbital apex. Unfortunately, prognosis remains dismal in MCs despite treatment.

Background

Mesenchymal chondrosarcomas (MCs) are highly aggressive cartilage forming tumours.1 2 Extraskeletal orbital MCs are extremely rare tumours.2 They have characteristic radiological features and pathognomic histological biphasic pattern. These tumours are malignant small round cell neoplasms with focal cartilaginous differentiation.3 4 Owing to rarity of these tumours, there are no definitive management guidelines available. Radical resection with negative margins is the primary modality of treatment; the role of adjuvant therapy is yet to be clearly defined.2 3 5 6 Though orbital location is associated with better survival compared to other locations, overall prognosis of MCs remains dismal.2 3

Case presentation

An 18-year-old man sought treatment for progressive proptosis and blurring of vision in right eye since 6 months. He had treatment for his present illness in another hospital where right orbitotomy and debulking of the tumour was undertaken 1 year ago; histopathological examination of the specimen confirmed MC. He was subsequently prescribed adjuvant chemotherapy but he did not go for the treatment.

Presently, his general and systemic physical examination was unremarkable. He had proptosis of the right eye with restriction of extraocular movements; even perception of light was absent in that eye. His other eye had almost normal vision (visual acuity of 6/9).

Investigations

CT of the head and neck region showed a 6.0×4.5 cm retrobulbar right orbital mass with marked proptosis; there were multiple cystic areas with calcification in the lesion and it was infiltrating the extraocular muscles. The tumour was also infiltrating the optic nerve, though no intracranial extension was seen. CT chest did not reveal any metastatic disease.

Contrast-enhanced MRI further revealed that there was no intracranial extension of the tumour along the optic nerve (figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

CT and MRI. Axial contrast-enhanced CT image (A) showing large lobulated heterogeneously enhancing intraconal orbital mass on right side with few calcifications, causing proptosis. Underlying bones appear grossly normal, except for mild pressure erosion of lamina papyracia on the right side. Axial and sagittal postcontrast T1 weighted fat saturation MRI (B and C) showing intensely enhancing lobulated intraconal orbital mass on the right side. The mass is encasing the right optic nerve (black arrow).

Treatment

The patient underwent initial pterional craniotomy for intradural sectioning of the optic nerve as well as control of ophthalmic artery to prevent traction on chiasma/optic nerve; intradural optic nerve resection was performed 3 mm proximal to the optic chiasm. Subsequently, a right orbital exenteration was performed and the temporalis muscle flap was used to fill the exenterated cavity (figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(A) Preoperative: Exophytic, fleshy right orbital mass. (B) Intraoperative: Transcranial intradural approach for optic nerve division, (C) Preserved temporalis muscle (in hand) and tumour (covered in gauze piece), (D) Post-tumour resection cavity filled with temporalis muscle.

Outcome and follow-up

Gross examination showed a 4×3×3 cm solid tumour; the cut surface was grey-white in colour. Microscopic examination showed a malignant tumour with an admixture of undifferentiated mesenchymal cells and islands of mature hyaline cartilage. The mesenchymal cells were ovoid to fusiform with round nuclei, finely dispersed chromatin and occasional nucleoli with sparse cytoplasm. There was moderate cellular pleomorphism. Mitotic figures were rare. No necrosis or haemorrhage was seen. On immunohistochemistry, the tumour cells were focally immunopositive for S100 protein. Ki-67 labelling index was high (∼25–30%). Based on the above histological and immunohistochemical features, a diagnosis of MC was made (figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(A) Cellular tumour composed of undifferentiated oval to spindle-shaped mesenchymal cells containing islands of moderately well-differentiated cartilage (arrow) (×400; H&E). (B) The tumour cells are mildly pleomorphic with round nuclei, finely dispersed chromatin, occasional prominent nucleoli and scant cytoplasm (×400; H&E). (C) Tumour cells are focally immunopositive for S100 (×400). (D) Ki-67 labelling index is high (×400).

The patient had uneventful postoperative recovery. He tolerated adjuvant radiotherapy (60 Gy/30 fractions) well. He is disease-free after 2 years of regular follow-up.

Discussion

Soft tissue sarcomas account for <1% of the overall burden of malignant tumours.7 Chondrosarcoma is a rare histological subtype and constitutes 1% of all soft tissue sarcomas. Conventional type is the most common; other rare histological variants are clear cell, mesenchymal, dedifferentiated chondrosarcomas.8 9 The pathogenesis of extraskeletal MC is unknown.3

MC is a rare and highly malignant cartilage forming tumour which was first described by Lichtenstein and Bernstein in skeletal system in 1959.1 Dowling first described extraskeletal MC in 1964.10 MC constitutes 1% of all chondrosarcomas and it can occur in skeletal and extraskeletal locations.11 In one of the largest case series of MC, Nakashima et al2 reported that 35% MCs were located in the extraskeletal system; the common locations were the meninges and lower extremity. Both Salvador et al and Nakashima et al reported only one patient of extraskeletal orbital MC each in their series of 30 and 111 patients, respectively.2 12 In one of the early case series Jacobs et al5 reported three cases of orbital MC with review of the literature and showed that optimal outcomes can be achieved with good quality controlled surgery. Font et al13 reviewed the literature and reported 26 cases of MC treated between 1969 and 2009 and highlighted the importance of multimodality management.

A PubMed search using MESH words ‘orbital neoplasm’ [Mesh] and ‘chondrosarcoma, mesenchymal’ [Mesh] was conducted on 17 July 2016; filters like humans, English and from 1 January 1990 to 31 December 2015 were applied to refine the search and identify the recent literature. A total of 18 articles were identified and further manual search of PubMed was performed, which yielded six more relevant articles. Most of the reviews focus on clinical presentations, radiological and pathological features. In this review we focused mainly on surgical approaches, multimodality management options, relapse patterns and survival outcomes (table 1).

Table 1.

Surgical approaches, treatment details, relapse patterns and survival outcomes in patients with mesenchymal chondrosarcoma of orbit

Number Author and year Age/sex Surgery Neoadjuvant/adjuvant treatment details Relapse Follow-up Status last visit
1 Hanakita et al 2012 20/F Exenteration with rectus muscle graft No No 6 years Disease-free
2 Szumera Cieckiewicz A et al 2012 31/F Partial excision 4 cycles NACT1
(DDP2+VP 163)
No 10 months Disease-free
29/F Enucleation Adjuvant RT4 Local 3.5 years Alive with disease
3 Patel R et al 2012 50/M Inferior orbitotomy and excision No No NA5 NA
4 Yang BT et al 2012 Six cases 11–37 years M:F 5:1 Surgery (details not provided) NA 2 local 0.5–8 years 4 disease free
2 alive with disease
5 Liu M et al 2010 26/F Lateral orbitotomy and excision Adjuvant RT (50 Gy) No 18 months Disease-free
6 Bonavolonta P et al 2010 23/M Trans-septal orbitotomy and excision No No 3 years Disease-free
7 Razak AR et al 2010 22/M Exenteration NACT 6 cycles (VIDE6) and adjuvant RT (60 Gy) No 2 years Disease-free
8 Font RL et al 2009 24/F Exenteration Adjuvant CT 4 cycles (AI) and adjuvant RT (60 Gy) No 8 years Disease-free
9 Kaur A et al 2008 25/F Lateral orbitotomy and excision. Followed by exenteration after 10 months for local recurrence Adjuvant CT (VAC7) 6 cycles and adjuvant RT (48.6 Gy) No 2 years Disease-free
27/M Exenteration Adjuvant CT (VAC) 6 cycles and adjuvant RT (41.4 Gy) No 2 years Disease-free
10 Odashiro AN 2009 14/M Lateral canthotomy and excision (R2 resection) Adjuvant CT (Details—NA) No 2 months Disease-free
11 Angotti-Neto H et al 2006 21/F Anterior orbitotomy and excision (piecemeal) Adjuvant RT No 6 months Disease-free
12 Tuncer S et al 2004 5 months/F Exenteration NACT+RT (1 VAC+3 IEC8+41.4 Gy RT) followed by 3 IEC adjuvant CT No 4 years Disease-free
13 Khouja N et al 1999 27/M Subfrontal epidural approach and excision twice followed by exenteration after second recurrence Adjuvant RT (65 Gy) Yes 2 years Alive with disease
14 Koeller et al 1999 Review article—No new case reported
15 Shinaver et al 1997 18/M Lateral orbitotomy and piecemeal excision (R2 resection) No NA NA Lost to follow-up
16 Sugiyama k et al 1995 16/M Craniofacial resection NA NA NA NA
17 Lauer et al 1995 NA Resection Adjuvant CT-RT9 (details—NA) N0 30 months Disease-free
18 Bumpous et al 1995 Transorbital approaches to cranial base—no new case reported
19 Herrera A et al 2012 52/M Exenteration Adjuvant VAC-IE10+66 Gy RT No NA Disease-free
20 Looi A et al 2006 7/M Lid sparing exenteration, temporalis transfer and dermis fat graft Adjuvant 8 cycles VAC-IE No 15 months Disease-Free
21 Kashyap S et al 2001 45/M Biopsy only NA NA NA NA
22 Jacobs et al 1994 13/F Kronlein orbitotomy and excision No No 18.5 years Disease-free
10/F Lateral orbitotomy and excision No No 16 years Disease-free
11/F Anterior craniotomy and excision (R2 resection) Adjuvant VAC for 9 weeks and 60.6 Gy RT No 6 months Dead
23 Bagchi M et al 1993 28/F Lateral orbitotomy and excision (piecemeal) NA No 2 years Disease-free
24 Khuteta A et al 1992 10/F Exenteration NA NA NA NA

*Search details—serial number 1–18 (PubMed search using MESH words “orbital neoplasm” [Mesh] and “chondrosarcoma, mesenchymal” [Mesh]. Further manual PubMed search revealed six more articles (serial number 19–24).

†NACT1—Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, DDP2—Cisplatin, VP 163—Etoposide, RT4—Radiotherapy, NA5—Not available, VIDE6—Vincristine, ifosfamide, adriamycin, etoposide, VAC7– Vincristine, actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide, IEC8—Ifoafamide, epirubicin, cisplatin, CT-RT9—Chemo-radiotherapy, VAC-IE10—Vincristine, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, etoposide.

Orbital MCs affect patients in their second or third decades of life, with a female preponderance. Common presentations are proptosis of eye ball with decreased visual acuity, pain in eye, headache and restriction of eyeball movements. Distant metastasis is exceptional at presentation.3 5 6 13 Radiological examination is usually warranted for diagnosis and anatomical localisation to access operability. The characteristic CT findings are a well-defined, enhancing lobulated mass with multiple areas of fine and coarse calcification. MRI is superior for delineation of lesion and it provides better visualisation of tumour extension, especially when there is neurological involvement. Marked contrast enhancement and type III time–intensity curve on MRI is highly suspicious for MC.14 The pathognomic histopathological appearance of MC is a biphasic pattern composed of mesenchymal and chondrocytic components; there are undifferentiated, round or spindle-shaped mesenchymal cells and areas of cartilaginous tissue often presenting central calcifications and even ossification. Vimentin and CD-99 immunostaining is positive in undifferentiated cells, and S-100 in the chondroid areas. The histological differential diagnosis for MCs includes Ewings sarcoma, lymphoma, neuroblastoma, desmoplastic small round-cell tumours and small cell osteosarcoma.2 4

Surgical resection is the mainstay of therapy. The aim of surgery is to achieve R0 resection.2 3 5 13 Our patient presented with a locally advanced disease with complete loss of the vision in the affected eye and the tumour involved the optic nerve up to the orbital apex. Though optic nerve involvement is not typical for orbital MC five cases in the literature have shown its involvement. In three cases the optic nerve was involved up to the orbital apex only and in remaining two cases intracranial extension was present.15–19 Difficulties are encountered during surgery in advanced tumours reaching up to the orbital apex and lateral approaches are recommended for such tumours.20 We did not attempt intraorbital division of the optic nerve as it might have resulted in positive margin; moreover, it might also have caused traction injury to the optic chiasma resulting in loss of vision in the other unaffected eye. Therefore, we used a transcranial intradural approach to divide the optic nerve and ophthalmic artery to prevent traction injury to the chiasma and ensure margin free resection.

Most MCs are resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. However, if the tumour is surgically unresectable or histologically highly aggressive, preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy may be considered.3 16 21 Adjuvant radiation can be considered in case of incomplete resection, close margins and recurrent tumours.5 6 13 21–23 Adjuvant chemotherapy may be considered in cases with aggressive behaviour and high-grade lesions. MC may be treated according to Ewing's sarcoma protocol, Vincristine, Dactinomycin, Cyclophosphamide and Doxorubicin (VACD) alone or alternating with Ifosfamide and Etoposide (VACD-IE).5 13 23 24 Details of various surgical approaches, neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment protocols are summarised in table 1.

Overall, MC has a dismal prognosis and the overall 5-year and 10-year survival for MC, considering all sites, is 55% and 27%, respectively.2 The prognosis is relatively better in head and neck (including orbit) MC in view of early detection and treatment.3 Details of relapse patterns and survival outcome are summarised in table 1.

Learning points.

  • Extraskeletal orbital mesenchymal chondrosarcomas (MC) is an extremely rare tumour.

  • Radical surgery offers a best chance of cure.

  • Optic nerve involvement is rare in orbital MCs. Transcranial approach may be used effectively to avoid traction on optic chiasma and ensure margin-free resection in case of optic nerve involvement up to the orbital apex.

  • Excellent outcomes can be achieved with good quality controlled surgery and additional chemotherapy and radiotherapy in incomplete resection and aggressive recurrent tumours.

Acknowledgments

Professor SVS Deo, Department of surgical oncology, AIIMS, New Delhi. DR Devajit Nath, Senior resident, Department of pathology, AIIMS, New Delhi. DR Chandrashekar, Associate professor, Department of radiology, AIIMS, New Delhi

Footnotes

Contributors: AJ and NKS contributed to concept, study design, literature search, manuscript preparation, manuscript review, operating surgeon and final approval of the manuscript. DM contributed to literature search, manuscript preparation, operating surgeon and final approval of the manuscript. SSK contributed to concept, manuscript review, operating surgeon and final approval of the manuscript.

Competing interests: None declared.

Patient consent: Obtained.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

  • 1.Lightenstein L, Bernstein D. Unusual benign and malignant chondroid tumors of bone. A survey of some mesenchymal cartilage tumors and malignant chondroblastic tumors, including a few multicentric ones, as well as many atypical benign chondroblastomas and chondromyxiod fibromas. Cancer 1959;12:1142–57. <1142::AID-CNCR2820120610>3.0.CO;2-D [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nakashima Y, Unni KK, Shives TC et al. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma of bone and soft tissue. A review of 111 cases. Cancer 1986;57:2444–53. 10.1002/1097-0142(19860615)57:12<2444::AID-CNCR2820571233>3.0.CO;2-K [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tuncer S, Kebudi R, Persayar G et al. Congenital mesenchymal chondrosarcoma or the orbit. Opthalmology 2004;111:1016–22. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.12.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shakked RJ, Geller DS, Gorlick R et al. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma: clinicopathologic study of 20 cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2012;136:61–75. 10.5858/arpa.2010-0362-OA [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jacobs JL, Merriam JC, Chadburn A et al. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma of the orbit. Report of three new cases and review of the literature. Cancer 1994;73:399–405. 10.1002/1097-0142(19940115)73:2<399::AID-CNCR2820730227>3.0.CO;2-G [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kaur A, Kishore P, Agrawal A et al. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma of the orbit: a report of two cases and review of the literature. Orbit 2008;27:63–7. 10.1080/01676830601169007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E et al. Cancer statistics. CA: A Cancer J Clin 2009;59:225–49. 10.3322/caac.20006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Toro JR, Travis LB, Wu HJ et al. Incidence patterns of soft tissue sarcomas, regardless of primary site, in the surveillance, epidemiology and end results program, 1978–2001: an analysis of 26,758 cases. Int J Cancer 2006;119:2922–30. 10.1002/ijc.22239 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chebib I, Hornicek FJ, Miriam AB et al. Histologic variants of chondrosarcoma. Diagnostic Histopathology 2014;20:172–80. 10.1016/j.mpdhp.2014.03.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dowling EA. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1964;46:747–54. 10.2106/00004623-196446040-00004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Trembath DG, Dash R, Major NM et al. Cytopathology of mesenchymal chondrosarcomas: a report and comparison of four patients. Cancer 2003;99:211–16. 10.1002/cncr.11300 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Salvador AH, Beabout JW, Dahlin DC. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma: observations on 30 new cases. Cancer 1971;28:605–15. 10.1002/1097-0142(197109)28:3<605::AID-CNCR2820280312>3.0.CO;2-R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Font RL, Ray R, Mazow ML et al. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma of the orbit: a unique radiologic-pathologic correlation. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;25:219–22. 10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181a142fc [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yang BT, Wang YZ, Wang XY et al. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma of the orbit: CT and MRI findings. Clin Radiol 2012;67:346–51. 10.1016/j.crad.2011.10.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hanakita S, Kawai K, Shibahara J et al. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma of the orbit--case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2012;52:747–50. 10.2176/nmc.52.747 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Szumera-Ciećkiewicz A, Ptaszyński K, Grabowski P et al. Quiz. Correct answer to the quiz. Check your diagnosis. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma of the orbit: two cases and a brief review of the literature. Pol J Pathol 2012;63:80–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Liu M, Qin W, Yin Z. An unusual case of primary mesenchymal chondrosarcoma in orbit with intracranial extension. Clin Imaging 2010;34(5):379–81. 10.1016/j.clinimag.2009.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shinaver CN, Mafee MF, Choi KH. MRI of mesenchymal chondrosarcoma of the orbit: case report and review of the literature. Neuroradiology 1997;39:296–301. 10.1007/s002340050413 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Khuteta A, Mishra YC, Pandey CL et al. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma of orbit with intra cranial extension (a rare case). Indian J Ophthalmol 1992;40:92–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Khouja N, Ben Amor S, Jemel H et al. Mesenchymal extraskeletal chondrosarcoma of the orbit. Report of a case and review of the literature. Surg Neurol 1999;52:50–3. 10.1016/S0090-3019(99)00033-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Razak ARA, Gurney L, Kirkham N et al. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma of the orbit: an unusual site for a rare tumour. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2010;19:551–3. 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2008.01028.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Angotti-Neto H, Cunha LP, Oliveira AV et al. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma of the orbit. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;22:378–82. 10.1097/01.iop.0000229691.87499.99 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Herrera A, Ortega C, Reyes G et al. Primary orbital mesenchymal chondrosarcoma: case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Med 2012;2012:292147 10.1155/2012/292147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Looi A, Kazim M, Cortes M et al. Orbital reconstruction after eyelid- and conjunctiva-sparing orbital exenteration. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;22:1–6. 10.1097/01.iop.0000189820.02983.3a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Patel R, Mukherjee B. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma of the orbit. Orbit 2012;31:126–8. 10.3109/01676830.2011.638097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bonavolonta P, Strianese D, Maria Luisa Vecchione MM et al. A challenging case of primary orbital mesenchymal chondrosarcoma. Orbit 2010;29:281–3. 10.3109/01676831003664327 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Odashiro AN, Leite LVO, Oliveira RS et al. Primary orbital mesenchymal chondrosarcoma: a case report and literature review. Int Ophthalmol 2009;29:173–7. 10.1007/s10792-007-9184-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Koeller KK. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma and simulating lesions of the orbit. Radiol Clin North Am 1999;37:203–17. xii 10.1016/S0033-8389(05)70088-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sugiyama K, Hirano A, Llena JF et al. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma in anterior skull base: case report. Noshuyo Byori 1996;13:57–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lauer SA, Friedland S, Goodrich JT et al. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma with secondary orbital invasion. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1995;11:182–6. 10.1097/00002341-199509000-00004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bumpous J, Janecka IP. Transorbital approaches to the cranial base. Clin Plast Surg 1995;22:461–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kashyap S, Sen S, Betharia SM et al. Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma of the orbit: a clinicopathological study. Orbit 2001;20:63–7. 10.1076/orbi.20.1.63.2646 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bagchi M, Husain N, Goel MM et al. Extraskeletal mesenchymal chondrosarcoma of the orbit. Cancer 1993;72:2224–6. 10.1002/1097-0142(19931001)72:7<2224::AID-CNCR2820720726>3.0.CO;2-U [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ Case Reports are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES