Summary
Clinical translation of cell-based strategies for regenerative medicine demands predictable in vivo performance where the use of sera during in vitro preparation inherently limits the efficacy and reproducibility. Here, we present a bioinspired approach by serum-free pre-conditioning of human periosteum-derived cells, followed by their assembly into microaggregates simultaneously primed with bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2). Pre-conditioning resulted in a more potent progenitor cell population, while aggregation induced osteochondrogenic differentiation, further enhanced by BMP-2 stimulation. Ectopic implantation displayed a cascade of events that closely resembled the natural endochondral process resulting in bone ossicle formation. Assessment in a critical size long-bone defect in immunodeficient mice demonstrated successful bridging of the defect within 4 weeks, with active contribution of the implanted cells. In short, the presented serum-free process represents a biomimetic strategy, resulting in a cartilage tissue intermediate that, upon implantation, robustly leads to the healing of a large long-bone defect.
Keywords: stem cells, progenitor cells, bone morphogenetic proteins, fracture healing, critical bone fractures, fracture nonunion regenerative medicine, serum free, cell-based constructs
Graphical Abstract
Highlights
-
•
Serum-free pre-conditioning affects the identity of periosteal progenitor cells
-
•
A reduced CD105+, elevated CD34+, and upregulated BMP receptor expression was seen
-
•
Priming by aggregation and BMP stimulation induced endochondral bone formation
-
•
Validation in a critical size fracture model confirmed endochondral healing
The use of sera in the preparation of cell-based strategies critically limits the efficacy and reproducibility of the process as it conflicts with cellular responses. Luyten and colleagues present a bioinspired engineering process including serum-free pre-conditioning combined with micro-aggregation and bone morphogenetic protein priming resulting in a self-sustained tissue intermediate that, upon implantation, successfully heals critical long-bone defects.
Introduction
Cell-based advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) have the potential to transform our health care systems, especially for patients with failing intrinsic tissue regeneration such as complex and large bone defects in compromised biological conditions (Einhorn and Gerstenfeld, 2015). The standard approach of this strategy typically includes: (1) donor cells to form tissues together with available host cells, (2) stimulatory factors to direct cellular processes, and (3) biomaterials to provide cells with 3D cues (Leijten and Khademhosseini, 2016). Despite major advances in the design, production and in vitro performance of ATMPs, only a fraction displays suitable characteristics for clinical translation (Leijten et al., 2014). Major reasons for this lack in clinical monetization of research efforts can be attributed to a poor design and lack of robust manufacturing protocols. In terms of the design, a biomimetic strategy inspired by developmental embryology provides a scientific foundation and offers key clues regarding the main players, sequences of events and 3D stimulatory cues in postnatal fracture healing (Lenas et al., 2009, Ingber et al., 2006, Ueno et al., 2001, Knothe Tate et al., 2008). Previous reports established that large bone defects mainly heal through the formation of an intermediate cartilaginous callus (Einhorn and Gerstenfeld, 2015). Consequently, in order to mimic the native healing process of a large long-bone defect, a cell-based ATMP was designed to develop along the endochondral route. However, the classical cell source for bone repair used today is a bone marrow aspirate from the iliac crest. Yet, bone marrow-derived cells exclusively contribute to fracture healing by direct bone formation (Colnot, 2009). In consequence, periosteum-derived cells (PDCs), the main contributing cells in endochondral fracture healing, may be a more clinically relevant cell source (Colnot, 2009, Colnot et al., 2012). Moreover, PDCs have shown osteochondrogenic potential both in vitro and in vivo (De Bari et al., 2006). As stimulatory factors, bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are of relevance due to their crucial role in PDC-mediated fracture healing (Tsuji et al., 2006, Chappuis et al., 2012). Moreover, specific BMP ligands have been shown to induce human PDC (hPDC)-mediated ectopic ossicle formation (Bolander et al., 2016).
Approval for clinical applications of BMP-2 and BMP-7 has already been obtained. However, their use has been associated with unpredictable bone formation due to a number of reasons, including the delivery of the supraphysiological levels required for progenitor cell recruitment (Shields et al., 2006, Pobloth et al., 2015). In vitro primed cell-based ATMPs could overcome this hurdle by delivery of the crucial number of progenitors required, appropriately primed in vitro to regenerate the damaged tissue in vivo. However, until now, in vitro stimulation of progenitor cells for in vivo tissue regeneration has been challenging. Long-term in vitro stimulated cells often fail to integrate with the host, likely due to the maturity of the tissue (Yamashita et al., 2015). Shorter priming periods on the other hand, seem not to be sufficient in terms of clinically relevant results (Eyckmans et al., 2013). A potential reason for this can be that the in vitro priming is carried out in medium containing serum (Ryan, 1979). Indeed, serum contains an undefined and variable range of factors such as cytokines and inhibitors that bind to cell surface receptors. In consequence, batch-to-batch variability significantly affects the characteristics of cell-based implants, leading to unpredictable behavior and outcomes (Jung et al., 2012, Baker, 2016).
It was therefore hypothesized that serum-free pre-conditioning of hPDCs prior to growth factor treatment could improve the cellular response. A chemically defined serum-free pre-conditioning regime of hPDCs was developed that led to an adapted progenitor cell population with improved differentiation capacity. When assembling the pre-conditioned cells into microaggregates, mimicking cellular condensations by providing biomimetic 3D cues, and simultaneously treating them with BMP-2, cell specification toward the osteochondrogenic lineages was observed. Interestingly, physiologically relevant levels of autocrine and paracrine growth factors were secreted by the fate-steered, engineered microtissues. In vivo, the self-sustained implant proceeded to mature into endochondral bone, recapitulating long-bone fracture healing. We anticipate that the proposed serum-free strategy can be translated in a wide array of applications within the field of regenerative medicine.
Results
Pre-conditioning Induces a Cellular Identity Shift toward a CD34+ Progenitor
To define the culture conditions that maintained cell viability without enhancing proliferation, hPDCs were cultured for 6 days in a chemically defined medium (CDM) and compared with hPDCs cultured in growth medium (GM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum. After 24 hr, as well as after 6 days of culture, cells in CDM showed no cell proliferation compared with GM-cultured cells (Figure 1A). However, after 6 days, elevated DNA contents per cell were seen in pre-conditioned cells (Figure 1B). To investigate whether adaptations in the cell cycle were caused, expression levels of cell cycle markers cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1), cyclin E1 (CCNE1), and baculoviral inhibitor of apoptosis repeat-containing 5 (BIRC5) were determined. Expression of CDK1, essential for cell cycle progression during S and G2 phases, displayed a 6-fold upregulation in pre-conditioned cells (Figure 1C). Similarly, a 7-fold increased transcript level of CCNE1, required for G1/S transition was found (Figure 1D). Interestingly, a 10-fold increased level of BIRC5, a negative regulator of apoptosis during the G2/M phase was also seen in pre-conditioned cells (Figure 1E). To further investigate changes in cellular identity, flow cytometry was performed to characterize the expression of conventional mesenchymal stem cell markers (Figure 1F). It was shown that over 97% of cells grown in GM were positive for CD73, CD90, and CD105, whereas only 81% of cells cultured in CDM were positive for CD105. Cells from both conditions were negative for CD14, CD20, and CD45 (Figure S1A), but 70% of the CDM pre-conditioned cells displayed positivity for CD34 (Figure 1F), a phenomenon that was not seen in human bone marrow stromal cells (Figure S1B). Kinetic studies by mRNA transcript analysis and flow cytometry revealed a gradual increase in CD34 expression as well as in the amount of receptors per cell during pre-conditioning (Figures 1G and 1H). The opposite trend was seen for CD105, where pre-conditioning led to a decreased expression of CD105 cells as well as a reduced amount of receptors per cell (Figures 1I and 1J). Of note, mRNA transcript levels of CD34 displayed a 70- and 20-fold higher expression in hPDCs from individual donors at passage zero (p0) compared with GM-expanded cells at passage 6 (p6), respectively (Figure S1C). In addition, CDM pre-conditioning led to increased cell size and less granularity (Figure S1D). However, no significant aberrations were observed in karyotype analysis (Figure S1E).
To investigate whether the pre-conditioning regimen may lead to an enhanced BMP response, mRNA transcript analysis of BMP type 1 and type 2 receptors was performed. CDM pre-conditioned cells displayed an increased expression of BMP type 1 (ALK1, ALK2, ALK3, and ALK6) and type 2 (BMPR2, ACVR2a, and ACVR2b) receptors, in comparison with standard cultured cells (Figure 1K). To further characterize the CDM-grown cells, mRNA transcript analysis displayed elevated expression of secreted factors relevant to bone formation: a 10-, 12-, and 4.6-fold increase for basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF-2), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP9) expression, respectively (Figure 1L). These results were also confirmed on the protein level through an ELISA assay on conditioned medium (Figure 1M). Combined, these data indicate that the serum-free pre-conditioning led to an adapted cellular phenotype specific for hPDCs. Reduced positivity for MSC markers was correlated to increased positivity for CD34 and elevated expression of BMP receptors, identifying a switch in cellular identity.
Enhanced Effect of BMP-2-Induced Differentiation in Pre-conditioned hPDCs
Next, we set out to investigate whether these changes would translate into distinct responses upon BMP treatment. hPDCs were pre-conditioned in CDM or GM followed by 24 hr, or 3 or 6 days of BMP-2 stimulation in CDM. After 6 days, morphological differences between the two conditions were seen (Figure 2A). Cells pre-conditioned under serum-containing conditions displayed a heterogeneous cell population with a fraction possessing a polygonal shape resembling differentiating cells (black arrows). Interestingly, BMP-2-stimulated cells pre-conditioned in CDM displayed a more homogeneous cell morphology in which the majority of the cells exhibited a polygonal shape (black arrows). This phenomenon was associated with an increase in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity since a 3- and 1.5-fold increase was observed after 3 and 6 days of BMP stimulation, respectively (Figure 2B). To confirm the differentiation stage of the cells, mRNA transcripts were analyzed. After 24 hr of BMP-2 stimulation, a 2-fold upregulation of SRY (sex determining region Y)-Box 9 (SOX9) was seen in BMP-2 stimulated samples and this effect was further elevated to over 10-fold in day 3 and day 6 samples (Figure 2C). Moreover, CDM pre-conditioned cells displayed a 1.6- and 2-fold elevated expression compared with serum conditions in day 3 and 6 samples. Similarly, the osteogenic marker Osterix (OSX) was upregulated in CDM pre-conditioned cells with a 1.6- and 1.9-fold increase after 3 and 6 days, respectively (Figure 2D). In support of the enhanced osteochondrogenic differentiation profiles of CDM pre-conditioned cells, analysis of collagen type 2a (COLL2A1), collagen type 10 (COLL10A1), runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2), and collagen type 1 (COLL1A1) is presented in Figure S2A. Activated BMP signaling was confirmed by inhibitor of differentiation 1 (ID1) expression, a 2.5- and 2-fold higher expression was seen in CDM pre-conditioned cells after 3 and 6 days, respectively (Figure 2E).
Pre-conditioned Cells Undergo Osteochondrogenic Differentiation
The mRNA transcript analysis suggested a robust chondrogenic as well as osteogenic differentiation in cells pre-conditioned in CDM. To define whether there was a subpopulation of cells that differentiated toward a specific lineage, a combined immunohistochemistry (IHC) for SOX9 (red), OSX (green), and DAPI (blue) was performed. Cells displayed similar positivity for SOX9 in both BMP-2-stimulated conditions, but a larger fraction of OSX-positive cells in CDM pre-conditioned cells, mainly in combination with SOX9 positivity (Figure 2F). Quantification of merged images confirmed elevated positivity for both markers in CDM pre-conditioned cells followed by BMP-2 stimulation (Figure 2G). Of note, the enhanced BMP response in CDM pre-conditioned cells was not specific for BMP-2. In fact, this was consistent for a range of BMPs including BMP-4, -6, -7, -9, and GDF5. Upon mRNA transcript analysis of SOX9 and OSX, a more than 2-fold increase was seen for all BMPs in cells pre-conditioned in CDM (Figures 2H and 2I). A similar phenomenon was seen for the BMP target gene ID1 (Figure 2J). The elevated osteochondrogenic differentiation was further supported by analysis of aggrecan (ACAN), osteocalcin (OCN), distal-less homeobox 5 (DLX5), BMP-2, and VEGF (Figure S2B). The effect of CDM pre-conditioning was confirmed in young and adult donors, and presented in Supplemental Information (Figure S3A–S3G). Upon ectopic in vivo implantation for 3 weeks, CDM pre-conditioning followed by BMP-2 stimulation led to elevated cartilaginous matrix formation compared with GM-stimulated cells (Figure S4). These data show that serum-free pre-conditioning uniquely leads to an increased differentiation response to several BMP ligands. This effect is independent of donor gender or age and in vitro findings were translated in the in vivo setting.
Enhanced Differentiation due to an Altered BMP Pathway Activation
Western blot analysis of the pre-conditioned cells after 60 min of BMP-2 stimulation displayed an altered BMP signaling pathway activation compared with GM control (Figures 3A–3E). Quantification displayed elevated phosphorylation of the SMAD1/5/8 complex and p38 in the CDM pre-conditioned cells, while cells stimulated under GM conditions displayed phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and p38 (Figures 3F–3H). Since BMP signaling is known to crosstalk with downstream regulators of Wnt and transforming growth factor β, the activation of β-catenin and the SMAD2/3 complex was investigated. It was shown that BMP stimulation under GM conditions led to an increased level of active β-catenin, while CDM pre-conditioned cells displayed phosphorylation of the SMAD2/3 complex (Figures 3I and 3J). Together, these data confirm that the enhanced osteochondrogenic differentiation observed in the CDM pre-conditioned cells was associated with an altered downstream signaling activation.
The CD34+ Cell Population Displayed a More Potent Osteochondrogenic Potential
To investigate whether it was the CD34+ cell population that was more BMP responsive, pre-conditioned CD34+ cells were sorted and compared with the total CDM population. On the mRNA transcript level, elevated CD34 expression was confirmed (Figure 3K). Interestingly, an upregulated expression of BMP receptors ALK1 and ALK6 was confirmed, whereas an upregulated trend was detected for ALK2 and BMPR2, and no difference was found for ALK3 (Figure 3L). Upon BMP-2 stimulation, the CD34+ population displayed a 2- and 5-fold elevated expression of SOX9 and OSX, respectively (Figure 3M). Cluster analysis displayed a correlation between elevated CD34, ALK1, ALK2, ALK6, BMRP2, SOX9, and OSX expression (Figure 3N), and specific grouping of the CD34+ population was depicted in a constellation plot (Figure 3O). Combined, these data indicate that the increased osteochondrogenic response is related to the CD34+ cell population.
Bioinspired 3D Aggregation and BMP-2 Stimulation Reduce Stemness and Cell Size
Cellular condensations precede limb bud development and therefore aggregation was investigated in order to enhance cell specification in hPDCs by providing biomimetic 3D cues. Aggregate size affects mechanical cues, nutrient flux, and cell-cell interaction forces. Optimal aggregate size was determined through an in vitro screening of 50, 100, and 250 hPDCs/aggregate. Cell aggregation was induced on pre-conditioned cells with or without BMP-2 stimulation for 6 days, after which the samples were analyzed by microscopy, mRNA transcript analysis, histology, and IHC. 2D-cultured cells were included as a control. Bright-field images showed that uniform aggregates were formed in the 100 and 250 cell aggregate size (Figure S5A). Next, the influence of aggregation and BMP-2 stimulation on the MSC markers CD73, CD90, and CD105 was investigated by flow cytometry (Figure 4A). The analysis of CD73 showed a reduced positivity from 96% to below 80% in aggregated cells in the presence of BMP-2. This effect was even more pronounced for CD90 with less than 45% positivity. The largest reduction was seen when analyzing CD105 expression: only 19% of the cells cultured in an aggregate system and stimulated with BMP-2 were positive compared with 96% in only aggregated cells. Moreover, aggregation induced a reduction in cell size compared with both the control and BMP-2-stimulated cells in 2D (Figure S5B). These data indicate that an aggregation-dependent effect on the CD34-enriched hPDC population was induced, further enhanced in combination with BMP-2 stimulation.
Aggregation and BMP-2 Treatment Synergistically Enhance In Vitro Osteochondrogenic Differentiation
Upon mRNA transcript analysis, BMP-2 stimulation induced an elevated expression of the chondrogenic markers SOX9, COLL2A1, and ACAN (Figure 4B), and the largest increase in expression was found in cells stimulated in 2D. Upon analysis of osteogenic markers RUNX2, ALP, and OSX, a synergistic effect of aggregation in combination with BMP-2 stimulation was seen, which was further increased with aggregate size (Figure 4C). The upregulated differentiation profile could be correlated to the expression of the transcriptional regulator DLX5, the BMP marker gene ID1, and the angiogenic marker VEGF (Figure 4D). Next, the gene expression data were confirmed on the protein level by IHC for SOX9 (red), OSX (green), and DAPI (blue) (Figure S6A). Histology for H&E, Alcian blue (AB) and alizarin red displayed the initiation of matrix formation in the in vitro stimulated microtissues, depicted in stained sections of 250 hPDCs/aggregate (Figure S6B). These data confirmed the induction of osteochondrogenic cell specification induced by the 3D environment, in which the aggregate size steered differentiation in combination with BMP-2.
In Vivo Ectopic Tissue Formation
Based on the in vitro analysis, the size of 250 cells/aggregate was selected for in vivo evaluation combined with or without simultaneous BMP-2 stimulation in parallel to 2D-stimulated cultures. In addition, 2D cultures stimulated with BMP-2 for 6 days followed by 24 hr of aggregation in the absence of BMP-2 were included in order to evaluate the combined as well as the individual effects of aggregation and BMP stimulation. Upon analysis of implants harvested after 1 week, H&E staining displayed microvessel formation (black arrows) which was shown to be 2-fold higher in samples treated with BMP-2. This effect was synergistic when combined with aggregation (Figures 5A and 5E). An AB staining revealed the deposition of cartilaginous matrix, rich in GAG content, in BMP-2-treated aggregates (black arrows) (Figure 5B), confirmed by Masson's trichrome (MT) stain, which displayed a more mature matrix tissue with a denser collagen content (black arrows) (Figure 5C). IHC for p-SMAD1/5/8 showed active BMP signaling in explants that were cultivated in the presence of BMP-2 or aggregated, depicted by brown nuclei (black arrows) (Figure 5D). When combined, the number of positive nuclei was further increased (black arrows). These data were confirmed by quantification of positive nuclei normalized to the total number of nuclei (Figure 5F). Due to the active BMP signaling, analysis of endogenous BMP-2 production was investigated by ELISA in conditioned medium at the time of implantation (Figure 5G). The combined effect of BMP-2 stimulation and aggregation displayed 1.5-fold higher BMP-2 protein levels in conditioned medium compared with fresh stimulation medium. This finding was further confirmed by enhanced mRNA transcript levels of BMP-2 expression at the time of implantation (Figure 5H).
After 3 weeks, H&E staining displayed the presence of hypertrophic chondrocytes in BMP-2-stimulated aggregates (3D) (black arrows), a phenomenon that was not seen in 2D stimulated cells followed by aggregation (2D-3D) (Figure 6A). An AB stain confirmed the formation of a dense matrix rich in GAGs (white arrows) (Figure 6B). These findings were further supported by an MT staining (Figure 6C). To analyze remodeling of the cartilaginous matrix, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining was performed, which showed positive areas in close vicinity to GAG-rich areas and hypertrophic chondrocytes (black arrows) (Figure 6D). Upon quantification, the BMP-2-stimulated aggregates displayed a 2-fold higher percentage of TRAP+ area (Figure 6E). Remodeling of the cartilage intermediate was further confirmed by IHC for DIPEN, the cryptic epitope of ACAN, typically exposed upon its degradation (black arrows) (Figure 6F). To further characterize the cartilaginous tissue, IHC for S100 confirmed a 6-fold higher positive area in BMP-2-stimulated aggregates (black arrows) (Figures 6G and 6H). Furthermore, a mature cartilaginous tissue was confirmed by IHC for Indian hedgehog (Ihh), expressed by (pre)hypertrophic chondrocytes (black arrows) (Figures 6I and 6J).
After 6 weeks, the 3D stimulated tissue intermediate had further developed along the endochondral route to form ectopic mineralized tissue (Figure 6K). Formation of bone ossicles were confirmed through H&E and MT staining. Bone (black arrows) and bone marrow (red arrows) were observed as well as zones of mature bone (green arrows) (Figure 6L). Active remodeling (blue arrows) was indicated by a TRAP staining while contribution of the implanted cells was confirmed by IHC specific for human osteocalcin (hOCN). These data confirm the in vivo maturation and reveal that the combined approach of cell aggregation and exposure to BMP-2 induced in vivo tissue development in a process closely resembling endochondral bone formation.
Healing of a Critical Size Long-Bone Defect
Based on the ectopic endochondral development of the in vitro primed microtissues, the orthotopic behavior was next assessed in a critical size tibia defect in immunodeficient mice. Upon transplantation, the in vitro BMP-2-stimulated aggregates led to bridging within 4 weeks as assessed by X-ray analysis in five of six animals (Figure 7A). Non-unions were confirmed in four of five controls up to 8 weeks after the creation of the defects. Full bridging by a mineralized matrix at 4 and 8 weeks was confirmed by nano-computed tomography scanned explants (Figure 7B). Qualitative analysis was assessed by histology and IHC. H&E and Safranin O/fast green staining revealed a cartilage intermediate 2 weeks post implantation (Figures 7C and 7D). Hypertrophic chondrocytes were present (gray arrows) in the center of the cartilaginous callus, whereas a mineralized tissue had started to form in the periphery, the latter being visualized by MT staining (black arrows) (Figure 7E). The early cartilage intermediate displayed positivity for TRAP (blue arrows), suggesting remodeling of the mineralized cartilaginous intermediate, a process that was maintained at week 4 but decreased at week 8 (Figure 7F). Moreover, the cartilage callus displayed positivity for hOCN, depicted by a brown stain (white arrows), confirming the contribution of donor cells (Figure 7G). At 4 weeks, a fully mineralized bridging was observed, where the MT staining showed more mature mineralized zones, indicated by red zones (yellow arrows) (Figure 7E). This mineralized tissue stained positive for hOCN (white arrows) (Figure 7G). After 8 weeks, the mineralized matrix displayed more zones of mature bone which was also confirmed to be positive for hOCN (white arrows) (Figures 7F and 7G). In addition, qualitative analysis confirmed the absence of cartilage or osseous tissue in control non-unions as well as a negative staining for hOCN (Figures 7C–7G). These data demonstrate a successful bridging of a critical size fracture by an in vitro primed cell-based construct.
Discussion
Cell-based ATMPs represent an opportunity for the qualitative long-term cure of incapacitated organs or tissues lacking adequate intrinsic biological potential to heal (Einhorn and Gerstenfeld, 2015). Despite scientific breakthroughs, only a fraction of the developed ATMPs today reaches success in clinical translation for many reasons, including the poor design of the ATMP, modest outcomes in rigorous clinical trials, manufacturing challenges, and cost of goods (Erben et al., 2014). To drive successful clinical translation, a deeper understanding of the basic biology that underlies (1) the mechanism of the healthy repair process that is failing and (2) the design of the engineered construct, is required (Loh et al., 2016). As a driving force in developing a clinically effective ATMP for large long-bone defect healing, the choice of progenitor cells is of importance where the periosteum represents a relevant tissue source. Autologous hPDCs can be isolated at the site of the fracture without a second surgery. However, there are limitations in terms of the amount of tissue available. The use of allogenic cells may allow harvest of larger tissues depending on the donor, but comprises the risk of disease transmission and immune response (Morizane et al., 2013). Consequently, current cell culture protocols focus on achieving a fast and efficient expansion phase without an appreciation of maintenance of the progenitor potential.
In addition, recent findings indicate that the majority of in vitro expanded cells undergo apoptosis upon implantation (Stegen et al., 2016). A cause may be the need to instantly adjust to a compromised environment, since current culture conditions represent a rather non-physiological and abundant nutritional source. Optimized culture conditions for clinically relevant progenitors are therefore essential for the in vitro preparation of cell-based constructs and should maintain cell survival, allow efficient growth factor treatments without batch-to-batch variation, and meet the regulatory guidelines (Dimarakis and Levicar, 2006).
We developed a serum-free pre-conditioning regime in a CDM in order to adapt/prepare progenitor cells for differentiation and the subsequent in vivo environment. Of note, pre-conditioning in CDM led to an increased DNA content per cell, but no cell proliferation or change in karyotype profile. This suggests the onset of endoreplication, a phenomenon where cells replicate the nuclear genome in the absence of cell division, leading to elevated DNA content and enhanced cell potential in order to save energy (Edgar and Orr-Weaver, 2001). This was further supported by increased mRNA transcript levels of the cell cycle markers CCNE1, CDK1, and BIRC5 (Banyai et al., 2016, Britton and Edgar, 1998, Yamamoto et al., 2008). Although the mechanism of endoreplication is not yet fully understood, studies in mice have shown improved adaptation to stress and/or limited energy sources, typically seen during tissue regeneration (Pandit et al., 2013, Sher et al., 2013). Although more studies are needed in order to elucidate whether cells from the periosteum adapt this mechanism after the initial proliferative burst in fracture healing, this may be a potential cause of their remarkable regenerative capacity (Roberts et al., 2015), a phenomenon partially replicated by the pre-conditioning.
Furthermore, a dramatic shift in MSC marker expression was seen, including an increased positivity for CD34 (Wood et al., 1997, Fina et al., 1990, Krause et al., 1994). There is evidence that CD34 is a marker for diverse progenitors including MSCs (Copland et al., 2008). In the current study, mRNA transcript levels of CD34 were higher in freshly isolated hPDCs grown to confluency. This indicates that native progenitors from the periosteum may be CD34+, but the expression is lost upon in vitro expansion. This is in line with previous reports with murine bone marrow mononuclear progenitors, defined as a potent osteoprogenitor cell population, losing their CD34+ upon in vitro expansion (Abdallah et al., 2015). Moreover, the CD34+ cell population displayed an enhanced expression and secretion of osteoprogenitor-secreted factors (Majka et al., 2001, Janowska-Wieczorek et al., 2002). In addition, an elevated expression of BMP type 1 and 2 receptors was seen, suggesting the generation of a more BMP-responsive cell population (Hidalgo et al., 2012). In line with these findings, CDM pre-conditioned hPDCs displayed an earlier onset of, as well as an elevated osteochondrogenic response to BMP treatment, confirmed by BMP-2, -4, -6, -7, -9, and GDF5 stimulation. This improved differentiation potential could be correlated to the CD34+ cell population. In addition, an altered activation of downstream signaling pathways was confirmed in the CDM pre-conditioned cells, suggesting a potential mechanism to the more potent differentiation. Importantly, a change in cellular phenotype and improved differentiation potential was observed in cells isolated from donors of different gender and age, in line with previous reports on the osteochondrogenic capacity of PDCs (Chang et al., 2014). Of note, a reduced response was seen in cells isolated from a 47-year-old female, which was associated with low expression levels of BMP receptors. Further screening of more samples will be required to determine whether this is a combined age- and gender-dependent phenomenon (Nicks et al., 2010). Since both an elevated osteogenic as well as chondrogenic differentiation was seen, IHC for SOX9 and OSX was performed to gain information at the single-cell level. Remarkably, CDM pre-conditioned cells displayed a positivity for both markers. Cell-fate studies have revealed that SOX9-expressing limb bud mesenchymal cells give rise to both chondrocytes and osteoblasts, where SOX9 expression precedes RUNX2 and OSX expression during limb bud development (Akiyama et al., 2005, Nakashima et al., 2002). As a consequence, the combined SOX9 and OSX positivity may reflect the stage when cells enter the hypertrophic or early osteoblast stage and undergo a transition from SOX9+ to OSX+ cells. On the other hand, additional markers such as ACAN, COLL10A1, RUNX2, and OCN are also upregulated, further opening the possibility of cells undergoing a dual- or trans-differentiating pathway (Yang et al., 2014, Zhou et al., 2014). Nevertheless, the elevated differentiation capacity seen in vitro could be correlated to an elevated cartilaginous tissue production in vivo. To further investigate the in vivo potential, a biomimetic system in the form of cell aggregation was introduced (Moreira Teixeira et al., 2012, Evans et al., 2013). Initially, an optimal size of the aggregate was determined and an increased aggregate size led to elevated expression of RUNX2, ALP, OSX, and VEGF. This could potentially be explained by the elevated forces exerted by the increased number of cells in the aggregates, which further steered differentiation toward the endochondral fate (Qi et al., 2008, Mammoto et al., 2011). Upon ectopic assessment in vivo, a synergistic effect of aggregation and BMP-2 treatment displayed an enhanced microvessel ingrowth along with the presence of GAG-rich matrix and active BMP signaling. It can be speculated that this was due to endogenous BMP production suggested by an elevated BMP-2 protein secretion, further supported by elevated BMP-2 expression on an mRNA transcript level. Therefore, the endogenous BMP secretion may further have contributed to in vivo endochondral bone formation (Einhorn, 1998, Schindeler et al., 2008). After 3 weeks in vivo, the presence of hypertrophic chondrocytes, cartilage remodeling, and degradation was observed in constructs where simultaneous stimulation by aggregation and BMP-2 was applied. At week 6, these constructs had further developed into bone ossicles. Assessment in a critical size long-bone defect displayed successful bone bridging 4 weeks post transplantation. Qualitative analysis at 2 weeks displayed a process resembling endochondral bone healing with the contribution of the transplanted hPDCs to both the intermediate cartilage tissue as well as the bridging bone. A reduced contribution of the implanted cells was seen at week 8, suggesting that host-derived cells are involved in the remodeling of the newly formed bone tissue.
This study reports the development of a cell-based strategy for the healing of a critical size long-bone defect through a cartilaginous intermediate using a serum-free, chemically defined, and biomimetic approach. In vitro BMP-2 treatment of cell-based bioinspired engineered microtissues leads to a primed but not mature cartilage tissue, self-sustained by endogenous production of growth and differentiation factors. Upon in vivo implantation, tissue formation is achieved in a process mimicking natural fracture healing. Encouragingly, this approach is applicable for autologous as well as allogenic progenitor cell populations. The presented findings represent a fundamental contribution to the successful development of clinically relevant cell-based constructs for tissue regeneration and provide convincing information on the importance of relevant in vitro conditions for the in vivo outcome.
Experimental Procedures
Pre-conditioning in CDM or GM as a control was carried out for 6 days. Directly following pre-conditioning, BMP-2 stimulation and/or aggregation was carried out for an additional 6 days. In vivo implantation was carried out ectopically and orthotopically in NMRInu/nu mice. Cell material was encapsulated in collagen type 1 gels for implantation. In vivo development of the implanted constructs was studied for up to 8 weeks. Detailed experimental procedures are provided in the Supplemental Information. The ethical committee for human medical research (KU Leuven) approved all procedures, and informed consent was obtained from the patients. All procedures on animal experiments were approved by the local ethical committee for animal research (KU Leuven). The animals were housed according to the guidelines of the Animalium Leuven (KU Leuven).
Author Contributions
The contribution of each author is as follows; J.B., planning, experimental design, experimental work, data collection and analysis, and manuscript drafting. W.J., experimental design and experimental work. J.L., L.M.T., D.L., and M.C., experimental work. V.B., experimental design. F.P.L., experimental design and data interpretation. All authors have read and accepted the final manuscript.
Acknowledgments
This work is part of Prometheus, the KU Leuven R&D division for skeletal tissue engineering. http://www.kuleuven.be/prometheus. The authors would like to thank M. V.d. Broeck, K. Bosmans, L. Ceysens, S. Bellinkx, and W.L. Tam for excellent technical assistance. The research leading to these results has been funded by: IWT-SBO-111545, FP/2007–2013/ERC grant agreement nos. 249191, FWO (12S6817N, 12O8715N, 12C8214N, 12I6216N, and 12G2715N), KU Leuven (PDMK/14/203), and NWO (14328). Nano-computed tomography images were generated in the X-ray computed tomography facilities of the Department of Materials Engineering of the KU Leuven, financed by the Hercules Foundation (project AKUL 09/001: Micro- and nano-CT for the hierarchical analysis of materials).
Published: February 9, 2017
Footnotes
Supplemental Information includes Supplemental Results, Supplemental Experimental Procedures, six figures, and one table and can be found with this article online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.01.005.
Supplemental Information
References
- Abdallah B.M., Al-Shammary A., Skagen P., Abu Dawud R., Adjaye J., Aldahmash A., Kassem M. CD34 defines an osteoprogenitor cell population in mouse bone marrow stromal cells. Stem Cell Res. 2015;15:449–458. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2015.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Akiyama H., Kim J.E., Nakashima K., Balmes G., Iwai N., Deng J.M., Zhang Z., Martin J.F., Behringer R.R., Nakamura T., de Crombrugghe B. Osteo-chondroprogenitor cells are derived from Sox9 expressing precursors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:14665–14670. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504750102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baker M. Reproducibility: respect your cells! Nature. 2016;537:433–435. doi: 10.1038/537433a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Banyai G., Baidi F., Coudreuse D., Szilagyi Z. Cdk1 activity acts as a quantitative platform for coordinating cell cycle progression with periodic transcription. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:11161. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bolander J., Ji W., Geris L., Bloemen V., Chai Y.C., Schrooten J., Luyten F.P. The combined mechanism of bone morphogenetic protein- and calcium phosphate-induced skeletal tissue formation by human periosteum derived cells. Eur. Cell Mater. 2016;30:11–25. doi: 10.22203/ecm.v031a02. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Britton J.S., Edgar B.A. Environmental control of the cell cycle in Drosophila: nutrition activates mitotic and endoreplicative cells by distinct mechanisms. Development. 1998;125:2149–2158. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.11.2149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chang H., Docheva D., Knothe U.R., Knothe Tate M.L. Arthritic periosteal tissue from joint replacement surgery: a novel, autologous source of stem cells. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2014;3:308–317. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2013-0056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chappuis V., Gamer L., Cox K., Lowery J.W., Bosshardt D.D., Rosen V. Periosteal BMP2 activity drives bone graft healing. Bone. 2012;51:800–809. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Colnot C. Skeletal cell fate decisions within periosteum and bone marrow during bone regeneration. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2009;24:274–282. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.081003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Colnot C., Zhang X., Knothe Tate M.L. Current insights on the regenerative potential of the periosteum: molecular, cellular, and endogenous engineering approaches. J. Orthop. Res. 2012;30:1869–1878. doi: 10.1002/jor.22181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Copland I., Sharma K., Lejeune L., Eliopoulos N., Stewart D., Liu P., Lachapelle K., Galipeau J. CD34 expression on murine marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells: impact on neovascularization. Exp. Hematol. 2008;36:93–103. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2007.08.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Bari C., Dell'accio F., Vanlauwe J., Eyckmans J., Khan I.M., Archer C.W., Jones E.A., Mcgonagle D., Mitsiadis T.A., Pitzalis C., Luyten F.P. Mesenchymal multipotency of adult human periosteal cells demonstrated by single-cell lineage analysis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:1209–1221. doi: 10.1002/art.21753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dimarakis I., Levicar N. Cell culture medium composition and translational adult bone marrow-derived stem cell research. Stem Cells. 2006;24:1407–1408. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edgar B.A., Orr-Weaver T.L. Endoreplication cell cycles: more for less. Cell. 2001;105:297–306. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00334-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Einhorn T.A. The cell and molecular biology of fracture healing. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1998:S7–S21. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199810001-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Einhorn T.A., Gerstenfeld L.C. Fracture healing: mechanisms and interventions. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2015;11:45–54. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2014.164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Erben R.G., Silva-Lima B., Reischl I., Steinhoff G., Tiedemann G., Dalemans W., Vos A., Janssen R.T., Le Blanc K., van Osch G.J., Luyten F.P. White paper on how to go forward with cell-based advanced therapies in Europe. Tissue Eng. Part A. 2014;20:2549–2554. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2013.0589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Evans S.F., Docheva D., Bernecker A., Colnot C., Richter R.P., Knothe Tate M.L. Solid-supported lipid bilayers to drive stem cell fate and tissue architecture using periosteum derived progenitor cells. Biomaterials. 2013;34:1878–1887. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.09.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eyckmans J., Roberts S.J., Bolander J., Schrooten J., Chen C.S., Luyten F.P. Mapping calcium phosphate activated gene networks as a strategy for targeted osteoinduction of human progenitors. Biomaterials. 2013;34:4612–4621. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fina L., Molgaard H.V., Robertson D., Bradley N.J., Monaghan P., Delia D., Sutherland D.R., Baker M.A., Greaves M.F. Expression of the CD34 gene in vascular endothelial cells. Blood. 1990;75:2417–2426. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hidalgo L., Martinez V.G., Valencia J., Hernandez-Lopez C., Vazquez M.N., Nunez J.R., Zapata A.G., Sacedon R., Varas A., Vicente A. Expression of BMPRIA on human thymic NK cell precursors: role of BMP signaling in intrathymic NK cell development. Blood. 2012;119:1861–1871. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-07-370650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ingber D.E., Mow V.C., Butler D., Niklason L., Huard J., Mao J., Yannas I., Kaplan D., Vunjak-Novakovic G. Tissue engineering and developmental biology: going biomimetic. Tissue Eng. 2006;12:3265–3283. doi: 10.1089/ten.2006.12.3265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Janowska-Wieczorek A., Majka M., Marquez-Curtis L., Wertheim J.A., Turner A.R., Ratajczak M.Z. Bcr-abl-positive cells secrete angiogenic factors including matrix metalloproteinases and stimulate angiogenesis in vivo in Matrigel implants. Leukemia. 2002;16:1160–1166. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jung S., Panchalingam K.M., Rosenberg L., Behie L.A. Ex vivo expansion of human mesenchymal stem cells in defined serum-free media. Stem Cells Int. 2012;2012:123030. doi: 10.1155/2012/123030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Knothe Tate M.L., Falls T.D., Mcbride S.H., Atit R., Knothe U.R. Mechanical modulation of osteochondroprogenitor cell fate. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2008;40:2720–2738. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2008.05.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krause D.S., Ito T., Fackler M.J., Smith O.M., Collector M.I., Sharkis S.J., May W.S. Characterization of murine CD34, a marker for hematopoietic progenitor and stem cells. Blood. 1994;84:691–701. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leijten J., Khademhosseini A. From nano to macro: multiscale materials for improved stem cell culturing and analysis. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;18:20–24. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2015.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leijten J., Chai Y.C., Papantoniou I., Geris L., Schrooten J., Luyten F.P. Cell based advanced therapeutic medicinal products for bone repair: keep it simple? Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2014;84:30–44. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2014.10.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lenas P., Moos M., Luyten F.P. Developmental engineering: a new paradigm for the design and manufacturing of cell-based products. Part I: from three-dimensional cell growth to biomimetics of in vivo development. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2009;15:381–394. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2008.0575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Loh K.M., Chen A., Koh P.W., Deng T.Z., Sinha R., Tsai J.M., Barkal A.A., Shen K.Y., Jain R., Morganti R.M. Mapping the pairwise choices leading from pluripotency to human bone, heart, and other mesoderm cell types. Cell. 2016;166:451–467. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Majka M., Janowska-Wieczorek A., Ratajczak J., Ehrenman K., Pietrzkowski Z., Kowalska M.A., Gewirtz A.M., Emerson S.G., Ratajczak M.Z. Numerous growth factors, cytokines, and chemokines are secreted by human CD34(+) cells, myeloblasts, erythroblasts, and megakaryoblasts and regulate normal hematopoiesis in an autocrine/paracrine manner. Blood. 2001;97:3075–3085. doi: 10.1182/blood.v97.10.3075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mammoto T., Mammoto A., Torisawa Y.S., Tat T., Gibbs A., Derda R., Mannix R., de Bruijn M., Yung C.W., Huh D., Ingber D.E. Mechanochemical control of mesenchymal condensation and embryonic tooth organ formation. Dev. Cell. 2011;21:758–769. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moreira Teixeira L.S., Leijten J.C., Sobral J., Jin R., van Apeldoorn A.A., Feijen J., van Blitterswijk C., Dijkstra P.J., Karperien M. High throughput generated micro-aggregates of chondrocytes stimulate cartilage formation in vitro and in vivo. Eur. Cell Mater. 2012;23:387–399. doi: 10.22203/ecm.v023a30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morizane A., Doi D., Kikuchi T., Okita K., Hotta A., Kawasaki T., Hayashi T., Onoe H., Shiina T., Yamanaka S., Takahashi J. Direct comparison of autologous and allogeneic transplantation of iPSC-derived neural cells in the brain of a non-human primate. Stem Cell Rep. 2013;1:283–292. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2013.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nakashima K., Zhou X., Kunkel G., Zhang Z., Deng J.M., Behringer R.R., de Crombrugghe B. The novel zinc finger-containing transcription factor osterix is required for osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Cell. 2002;108:17–29. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00622-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nicks K.M., Fowler T.W., Akel N.S., Perrien D.S., Suva L.J., Gaddy D. Bone turnover across the menopause transition: the role of gonadal inhibins. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;1192:153–160. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05349.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pandit S.K., Westendorp B., de Bruin A. Physiological significance of polyploidization in mammalian cells. Trends Cell Biol. 2013;23:556–566. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2013.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pobloth A.M., Duda G.N., Giesecke M.T., Dienelt A., Schwabe P. High-dose recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 impacts histological and biomechanical properties of a cervical spine fusion segment: results from a sheep model. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2015 doi: 10.1002/term.2049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qi M.C., Hu J., Zou S.J., Chen H.Q., Zhou H.X., Han L.C. Mechanical strain induces osteogenic differentiation: Cbfa1 and Ets-1 expression in stretched rat mesenchymal stem cells. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2008;37:453–458. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2007.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roberts S.J., van Gastel N., Carmeliet G., Luyten F.P. Uncovering the periosteum for skeletal regeneration: the stem cell that lies beneath. Bone. 2015;70:10–18. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ryan J.M. Effect of different fetal bovine serum concentrations on the replicative life span of cultured chick cells. In Vitro. 1979;15:895–899. doi: 10.1007/BF02618046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schindeler A., Mcdonald M.M., Bokko P., Little D.G. Bone remodeling during fracture repair: the cellular picture. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2008;19:459–466. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2008.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sher N., von Stetina J.R., Bell G.W., Matsuura S., Ravid K., Orr-Weaver T.L. Fundamental differences in endoreplication in mammals and Drosophila revealed by analysis of endocycling and endomitotic cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:9368–9373. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1304889110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shields L.B., Raque G.H., Glassman S.D., Campbell M., Vitaz T., Harpring J., Shields C.B. Adverse effects associated with high-dose recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 use in anterior cervical spine fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31:542–547. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000201424.27509.72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stegen S., van Gastel N., Eelen G., Ghesquiere B., D'anna F., Thienpont B., Goveia J., Torrekens S., van Looveren R., Luyten F.P. HIF-1alpha promotes glutamine-mediated redox homeostasis and glycogen-dependent bioenergetics to support postimplantation bone cell survival. Cell Metab. 2016;23:265–279. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tsuji K., Bandyopadhyay A., Harfe B.D., Cox K., Kakar S., Gerstenfeld L., Einhorn T., Tabin C.J., Rosen V. BMP2 activity, although dispensable for bone formation, is required for the initiation of fracture healing. Nat. Genet. 2006;38:1424–1429. doi: 10.1038/ng1916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ueno T., Kagawa T., Mizukawa N., Nakamura H., Sugahara T., Yamamoto T. Cellular origin of endochondral ossification from grafted periosteum. Anat. Rec. 2001;264:348–357. doi: 10.1002/ar.10024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wood H.B., May G., Healy L., Enver T., Morriss-Kay G.M. CD34 expression patterns during early mouse development are related to modes of blood vessel formation and reveal additional sites of hematopoiesis. Blood. 1997;90:2300–2311. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamamoto H., Ngan C.Y., Monden M. Cancer cells survive with survivin. Cancer Sci. 2008;99:1709–1714. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2008.00870.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamashita A., Morioka M., Yahara Y., Okada M., Kobayashi T., Kuriyama S., Matsuda S., Tsumaki N. Generation of scaffoldless hyaline cartilaginous tissue from human iPSCs. Stem Cell Rep. 2015;4:404–418. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2015.01.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang L., Tsang K.Y., Tang H.C., Chan D., Cheah K.S. Hypertrophic chondrocytes can become osteoblasts and osteocytes in endochondral bone formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:12097–12102. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1302703111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou X., von der Mark K., Henry S., Norton W., Adams H., de Crombrugghe B. Chondrocytes transdifferentiate into osteoblasts in endochondral bone during development, postnatal growth and fracture healing in mice. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004820. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.