ARRB1 enhances the chemosensitivity of lung cancer through the mediation of DNA damage response

Abstract

ARRB1 (also known as β-arrestin-1) serves as a multifunctional adaptor contributing to the regulation of signaling pathways. ARRB1 may be involved in DNA damage accumulation; however the underlying mechanism involved is unclear. In the present study, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines (H520 and SK-MES-1) were transfected with ARRB1 plasmids or small interfering ribonucleic acid (siRNA) and received treatment with DNA-damaging agents (cisplatin and etoposide). A mouse xenograft model was used to assess the impact of ARRB1 on the efficacy of cisplatin in vivo. A total of 30 surgically resected NSCLC patients were recruited for the present study and qRT-PCR was performed to determine the mRNA levels in cancer tissues compared with para-carcinoma tissues. Our data showed that DNA damage was abrogated in the ARRB1-knockdown cells and enhanced in the ARRB1-overexpressing cells. ATR and Chk1 were more activated in the ARRB1-overexpressing cells compared to the ARRB1-knockdown cells, followed by increased H2AX phosphorylation. DNA damage and apoptosis were increased in the ARRB1-overexpressing cells treated with cisplatin. These data provided strong evidence that ARRB1 contributes to the response of NSCLC to DNA-damaging agents and is essential for DNA damage response (DDR). ARRB1 may enhance the efficacy of DNA-damaging agents in NSCLC.

Introduction

Lung cancer is one of the most common types of malignancies. It is not only the leading cause of cancer-related deaths, but also the most frequently diagnosed cancer worldwide (1). Yearly, it accounts for more than 1.8 million newly diagnosed cases (13% of total) and 1.6 million cancer-related deaths (19.4% of total) (2). Approximately 90% of all lung cancers are NSCLC, with 25–30% of the NSCLC cases being squamous cell cancer (SCC) (3). SCC is the second most common histologic subtype of NSCLC (4). Compared with other histologic types, SCC exhibits distinct epidemiological, clinicopathological and molecular characteristics. In particular, SCC lesions are usually located centrally in segmental, lobar or main bronchi, may show central cavitation and are associated with increased rates of hemorrhage compared with other lung cancer types (5). While outcomes have improved with adenocarcinoma, treatment options and outcomes are still limited in patients with advanced-stage SCC (4). To date, no agents have been specifically approved for the treatment of SCC (3).

Surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy are major treatment methods for lung cancer patients (6). Therein, surgery is considered as the most effective curable method, particularly for early-stage patients. However, ~70% of lung cancer patients suffer from local advanced or metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis and are unsuitable to receive surgical treatment (7). Thus, receiving chemotherapy is unavoidable for these patients and the efficacy of chemotherapy is still a matter of concern. The genome DNA is constantly exposed to various genotoxic insults. The DNA damage response (DDR) is a complex signal transduction pathway that leads to multiple outcomes including cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, senescence and apoptosis (8–10). DNA-damaging agents induce various types of DNA damage including modification of bases, intra-strand crosslinks, inter-strand crosslinks, single-strand breaks (SSBs) and double-strand breaks (DSBs). Each type of DNA damage is recognized and processed by proteins involved in the DDR. The response to DNA DSBs and collapsed replication forks is particularly crucial as these types of damage are difficult to repair. To respond to DNA damage, ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) or ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) phosphorylates and activates checkpoint kinase 1/2 (Chk1/2), and then causes cell cycle arrest and DNA repair, otherwise it may lead to cell apoptosis when DNA damage is too severe.

Arrestins were initially discovered to interact with G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to mediate their internalization and desensitization (11,12). In recent years, more and more novel functions of ARRB1 have been discovered. Arrestins, including ARRB1, always serve as adaptors, scaffolds and/or signal transducers, and they connect the activated receptors with diverse signaling pathways within the cell. ARRB1 plays a vital role in scaffolding and modulating varieties of intracellular signaling networks such as NF-κB and Mdm2/p53 (13). In this diversity of cell signaling pathways, ARRB1 may have different effects on the cellular process. Our former study showed that loss of ARRB1 expression was associated with poor survival of NSCLC particularly in SCC (14). Recently, it was reported that ARRB1 may be involved in DNA damage, which is a common target of chemotherapy and radiotherapy (15,16), however, whether DDR is involved in this process remains unclear. We aimed to study the role of ARRB1 in DDR induced by DNA-damaging agents, and to explore the underlying mechanism of regulation within it.

Materials and methods

Ethical approval

Written informed consent was obtained from all the subjects involved and the present study was approved by the Shandong Provincial Hospital Ethics Committee. All methods used in the present study were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines.

Patients

Fresh frozen tissue samples from 30 patients with primary lung squamous cancer who had undergone complete surgical resection were obtained in the present study (Table I). Patients and relevant data were acquired from the Bio-Bank of Shandong Provincial Hospital from January 2011 to December 2012.

Table I.

Characteristics of the patients with SCC-NSCLC in the present study.

Variables	n	Percentage (%)
All cases	30	100.00
Age at diagnosis (years)
≥60	21	70.00
<60	9	30.00
Gender
Female	5	16.67
Male	25	83.33
Smoking index
≥400	23	76.67
<400	7	23.33
Tumor differentiation
Well	0	0.00
Moderate	21	70.00
Poor	9	30.00
Pathological stage
I+II	5	16.67
III+IV	25	83.33
Lymph node status
Negative	18	60.00
Positive	12	40.00

SCC, squamous cell cancer; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer.

The Ethics Community of Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong University permitted the undertaking of the present study and the informed consent from patients for the use of clinical data was obtained before surgery.

For the histology and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, the classification criteria for lung tumors from the World Health Organization and International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (WHO/IASLC) was applied. For the follow-up, patients were evaluated every 3 months by thorax CT and abdomen ultrasonography for the first 2 years after surgery along with adjuvant treatment, and annually thereafter according to schedule.

Cell culture and transfection

Two human lung squamous cancer cell lines (H520 and SK-MES-1) were used in the present study. Both of them were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA, USA). Cells were grown in monolayer cultures in RPMI-1640 medium (HyClone, Logan, UT, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in a humidified 37°C atmosphere of 5% CO₂. For both plasmids (pcDNA and ARRB1) and siRNA transfection, all cells were seeded into 6-well cell culture plates (diameter of each well was ~35 mm; Corning, Corning, NY, USA). When the cell density reached ~50–70% confluence the next day, Lipofectamine 2000 transfection reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was applied according to the manufacturers instructions.

MTT and colony formation assays

The 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was used to assess the cytotoxicity of DNA-damaging agents. Cells were seeded into 96-well culture plates with a density of 3×10³ and incubated for 24 h under the conditions described above for standard cell culture maintenance. Then, the cells received cisplatin or etoposide treatment at different doses. After a 48-h treatment, 10 µl MTT reagent was added into each well and incubated for another 4 h. Finally, 100 µl dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added into each of the same wells. Then, the optical density value of each well was determined using a Bio-Rad model 680 microplate reader at a wavelength of 490 nm.

As for the colony formation assay, cells were plated into 12-well culture plates with 1,000 cells in each well. On the following day, the cells received drugs (1.5 µM cisplatin or etoposide) and were then incubated for 14 days. Subsequently, the plates were stained with crystal violet, and a colony count was conducted using ImageJ software.

Western blotting and co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP)

Western blotting was performed to detect the specific protein levels (total or phosphorylated). Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer supplemented with PhosSTOP (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) on ice. After BCA protein quantification, loading buffer was added into the mixture. Then, a standard western blotting procedure was performed. Nitrocellulose filter membranes with proteins were covered with primary antibodies overnight. After washing the membrane 3 times with Tris-buffered saline and Tween-20 (TBST), horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-mouse, anti-goat or anti-rabbit antibodies were applied according to the primary antibodies on the following day. After washing the membranes 3 times with TBST, the protein levels were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection reagent (Advansta Corp., Menlo Park, CA, USA).

For Co-IP, cells after treatment were lysed by RIPA solution for Co-IP on ice for 30 min. Then, BCA protein quantification was conducted. Each adjusted buffer was added to 5 µl anti-ARRB1 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) and protein A and G Sepharose beads (Invitrogen) overnight. The beads were washed 3 times with immune-complex buffer and resolved by SDS-PAGE. Then 1X sample buffer was added to the resolved precipitates and the mixture was boiled for 10 min. Subsequently, western blotting was performed.

Antibodies used in the western blotting are listed as follows. Anti-GAPDH antibody was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Anti-caspase3, -PARP, -ARRB1 and anti-phosphorylated-ATR (Ser428), -ATM (Ser1981), -Chk1 (Ser345), -Chk2 (Thr68), -BRCA1 (Ser1524), -H2AX (Ser139) and -NF-κB p65 (Ser536) antibodies were all purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). Anticancer drugs (cisplatin and etoposide) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

Flow cytometry

PE-Annexin V/7-amino-actinomycin D (7-AAD) staining assay was used to assess apoptosis. Annexin V is a phospholipid-binding protein with a high affinity for phosphatidylserine (PS). In normal live cells, PS is located on the cytoplasmic surface of the cell membrane. When cells undergo apoptosis, PS is translocated from the inner to the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane, and becomes available for Annexin V binding (17). 7-AAD is generally cell-impermeable for live cells, and undergoes a spectral shift upon association with DNA. Thus, it has been used to label necrotic or late apoptotic/dead cells with damaged cell membranes (18). Therefore, combination of PE-Annexin V and 7-AAD stains can be exploited to distinguish cells undergoing necrosis and apoptosis to cell death (19). Apoptosis was detected in the present study, using flow cytometry (FCM). A PE Annexin V apoptosis detection kit (559763) and a LSRFortessa (both from BD Pharmingen, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) were used for FCM. No adjustments were made to the instrument configuration and settings.

Comet assay

The comet assay (also called single-cell gel electrophoresis) is a sensitive and rapid method for DNA strand-break detection in eukaryotic cells (20). We performed the assay according to the instructions (Cell Biolabs Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) to evaluate the DNA damage induced by chemotherapy. Cells were digested by trypsin and washed twice with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Then, OxiSelect Comet Slides were covered with a mixture of comet agarose and the cells. After lysis, the slides underwent electrophoresis for 30 min under 1 V/cm at 4°C. Cells were stained with Vista Green DNA dye and visualized using epifluorescence microscopy. The percentage of DNA migrated in the tail (% of tail DNA), the tail moment and the length of DNA migration (tail length) were analyzed by Comet Assay IV software V4.3 (Perceptive Instruments, Suffolk, UK).

Animal study

All mouse experimental procedures were performed in accordance with the Regulations for the Administration of Affairs Concerning Experimental Animals approved by the State Council of the People's Republic of China. In addition, the present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shandong Provincial Hospital. All methods used in the present study were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines.

BALB/c-nu mice (female, 5–6 weeks old) were purchased from the Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology (VRL; Beijing, China). Mice were bred and maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions. All animal experimental protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of Shandong University. H520 cells (4×10⁶) were subcutaneously injected into mice. Tumor growth was monitored and evaluated according to volume (length × width × width/2) at the indicated time-points during a 28-day period after the tumor volume reached 100 mm³. To assess the effect of ARRB1 on cisplatin in vivo, mice were divided into groups with matched weight: i) the group treated with 2.5 mg/kg cisplatin (control group); ii) the group treated with 2.5 mg/kg cisplatin after in vivo transfection of ARRB1 (ARRB1+ group). Cisplatin (2.5 mg/kg) dissolved in normal saline was intraperitoneally injected every third day in both groups. ARRB1 plasmid (1.5 mg/kg) was intratumorally injected 24–48 h before cisplatin treatment in the ARRB1+ group.

Statistical analysis

All statistical calculations were performed using SPSS 19.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Each experiment was performed in triplicate, at least 3 independent times. In addition, data are expressed in the form of count or mean ± standard deviation, and analyzed by t-test or χ² test according to the data characteristics (continuous variables, t-test; categorical variables, χ² test). For all calculations, P-values were all two-sided and <0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant result.

Results

Downregulation of ARRB1 in lung SCC patients

Characteristics of the patients are shown in Table I. Compared with para-carcinoma tissues, a significant downregulation of ARRB1 in SCC tissues was noted. Of the 30 matched cancer and normal tissues, the mRNA level of ARRB1 in 16 cancer tissues was decreased in comparison with this level in the matched para-carcinoma tissues. SCC patients with low levels of ARRB1 showed significantly poorer overall survival (OS) (P=0.0306) when compared with the OS in the patients with high ARRB1 (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Kaplan-Meier survival curve for the overall survival (OS) of 30 SCC patients. Those patients with low levels of ARRB1 showed significantly poorer OS; P=0.0306.

ARRB1 increases the efficacy of DNA-damaging agents in SCC in vitro

Cisplatin and etoposide were used in H520 and SK-MES-1 cell lines, respectively, at various concentrations and the resulting cell viability was assessed using MTT and colony formation assays (Fig. 2). The data we obtained suggested that ARRB1 enhanced the sensitivity of tumor cells to chemotherapy at lower concentrations and that ARRB1-knockdown increased resistance to chemotherapy.

Figure 2.

Effect of cisplatin and etoposide at various concentrations in H520 and SK-MES-1 cell lines with overexpression of ARRB1(+) or knockdown of ARRB1(−). The cell viability was evaluated by (A) MTT assay and (B) colony formation assay. ARRB1 overexpression enhanced the sensitivity of tumor cells to chemotherapy at lower concentrations and ARRB1-knockdown increased resistance to chemotherapy.

ARRB1 modulates the DDR pathway activated by DNA-damaging agents

We found that phosphorylated ATR and Chk1 were downregulated after ARRB1 knockdown. On the contrary, ATR and Chk1 maintained phosphorylation activation with ARRB1 transfection, which was in accordance with the status of BRCA1 activation (Fig. 3A and B). Downregulation of phosphorylated BRCA1, ATR and Chk1 indicated that DDR was inhibited. However, concurrently, downregulation of phosphorylated BRCA1 also indicated initiation of DNA repair. We also found that depletion of ARRB1 inhibited the phosphorylation of H2AX, which is a biomarker of DSBs. On the contrary, overexpression of ARRB1 increased the phosphorylation of H2AX, which was in accordance with the status of NF-κB phosphorylation (Fig. 3C and D).

Figure 3.

Expression of ARRB1, p-BRCA1, p-ATR, p-Chk1 and GAPDH in the H520 cell line (A) transfected with siARRB1-1 or siARRB1-2 or (B) the overexpression plasmid ARRB1(+) following treatment with 1.5 µM cisplatin. The phosphorylated ATR and Chk1 were downregulated after ARRB1 knockdown; on the contrary, ATR and Chk1 maintained phosphorylation activation with ARRB1 transfection. Expression of ARRB1, γ-H2AX, p-NF-κB and GAPDH in the H520 cell line (C) transfected with the overexpression plasmid ARRB1(+) or (D) with siARRB1 following treatments with various concentrations of cisplatin. Depletion of ARRB1 inhibited the phosphorylation of H2AX, on the contrary, overexpression of ARRB1 increased the phosphorylation of H2AX.

ARRB1 enhances apoptosis and DNA damage induced by DNA-damaging agents

In order to quantitatively and precisely analyze the cellular responses and apoptosis, the FCM apoptosis and necrosis assay (Annexin V and 7-AAD) was performed in the experiments. In the present study, PE-Annexin V staining was used to detect the externalization of PS in apoptotic cells, and 7-AAD was applied to stain necrotic and dead cells, which lose their cell membrane integrity. Fig. 4A and B, revealed that there were more apoptotic cells in the ARRB1-overexpressing cells compared with the control group, and less apoptotic cells in the ARRB1-knockdown cells. These are in accordance with the DNA damage results assessed by comet assay (Fig. 4C).

Figure 4.

(A) Density plots drawn with Annexin V as the x-axis and 7-AAD as the y-axis. Necrotic cells are indicated at the upper left corner (Q1); dead or late apoptotic cells are indicated at the upper right corner (Q2); live cells are indicated at the lower left corner (Q3); early apoptotic cells are indicated at the lower right corner (Q4) in the plots. (B) A higher percentage of early apoptotic cells was noted in the ARRB-overexpressing cells compared with the control group, and a lower percentage of apoptotic cells was noted in the ARRB1-knockdown cells. (C) Three parameters (% of tail DNA, tail length and tail moment) of the comet assay were all increased compared with the control group after transfection with ARRB1 plasmids.

Overexpression of ARRB1 leads to decreased tumor size in vivo

We examined the effect of ARRB1 overexpression via treatment with cisplatin on mouse xenograft models of lung cancer cells (H520). We observed a significant trend of decreased tumor growth with this treatment (P=0.038) (Fig. 5).

Figure 5.

(A and B) ARRB1 transfection in vivo decreases tumor growth, when compared to the control group (P=0.038). This indicated that tumors were more sensitive to cisplatin.

Discussion

In our research, we designed a series of experiments to explore the possible impacts of ARRB1 expression on chemotherapy efficacy in NSCLC and relevant mechanisms of regulation of ARRB1 in DDR induced by DNA-damaging agents. When cells detect DNA damage, DDR may immediately start. Then, the two key kinases ATR and ATM are activated. ATR and ATM are vital signaling molecules in the DDR pathway, which regulate the cell cycle, cell apoptosis and DNA repair (21). With the ATR-Chk1 and ATM-Chk2 pathways activated, Chk1 and Chk2 may be phosphorylated. Then phosphorylated-Chk1 (p-Chk1) phosphorylates the cdc25 family and other downstream substrates, which induce cell cycle arrest, DNA repair and other cellular responses. Similarly, phosphorylated-Chk2 (p-Chk2) phosphorylates p53 and the suppression of the combination of MDM2 and p53, causes p53 upregulation (22). Activated p53 enhances the expression of p21, 14-3-3σ, GADD45 and other signaling molecules, which ultimately causes cell cycle arrest. Thus, cells may have plenty of time to complete the DNA repair process. If the DNA repair process cannot be completed in time, it may lead to cell apoptosis (23).

Kook et al reported that ARRB1 is cleaved by caspases, and then binds to truncated BID (tBID) (24), which means that ARRB1 directly regulates apoptosis. Apart from that, our results revealed that more ATR and H2AX were phosphorylated compared with the control group after transfection with the ARRB1 plasmids. As a vital indicator of DNA DSBs, H2AX is required for checkpoint-mediated cell cycle arrest and DNA repair in DDR. That is to say, more DNA damage occurs after ARRB1 levels are increased. This fact also indicates that ARRB1 may enhance cell apoptosis and promote chemotherapy efficacy. The potential mechanism may be related with the interaction between ARRB1 and ATR and H2AX (25). ARRB1 is likely to be involved in the phosphorylation/activation of H2AX and ATR. In contrast, low expression of ARRB1 can suppress cell proliferation through inhibition of cellular pathways such as the NF-κB pathway. Activation of the NF-κB pathway was reported to be associated with chemoresistance and anti-apoptosis. Numerous studies have confirmed that ARRB1 in the nucleus promotes activation of the NF-κB pathway (26,27). NF-κB is widely used by eukaryotic cells as a regulator of genes that control cell proliferation and cell survival. As such, many different types of human tumors have misregulated NF-κB. A previous study showed that co-expression of nuclear ARRB1 and NF-κB is associated with cancer progression and poor prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma (28), which indicates the potential relationship of ARRB1 and NF-κB.

In conclusion, ARRB1 participates in numerous cellular pathways and diversely functions under different circumstances. Our results and data showed that ARRB1 promoted DNA damage and cell apoptosis and depletion of ARRB1 inhibited DDR pathway activation. Thus, we surmise that ARRB1 may enhance chemosensitivity and be beneficial to cancer treatment. However, various clinical studies have reported that a high level of ARRB1 is related to a poor outcome in cancer treatment (29). Thus, the status of ARRB1 is associated with different tumor characteristics.

The roles of ARRB1 played in lung cancer treatment have not been extensively studied, and in particular its clinical relevance has not been previously addressed. The detailed and concrete functions of ARRB1 in lung cancer treatment require further study.