ABSTRACT
The whole-genome sequences of three strains of Rhizobium gallicum reported here support the concept that the distinct nodulation host ranges displayed by the symbiovars gallicum and phaseoli can be largely explained by different symbiotic plasmids.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Rhizobium gallicum is a nitrogen-fixing symbiotic bacterium of worldwide distribution that was initially isolated from common bean nodules (Phaseolus vulgaris). Here, we provide the complete genome sequences of two broad nodulation host range R. gallicum sv. gallicum strains: R602 and IE4872, and for the R. gallicum sv. phaseoli 8C-3 strain that nodulates only common bean. R602 is the type strain isolated in Maine-et-Loire in France by Amarger et al. (1). The IE4872 and 8C-3 strains were isolated in San Miguel Acuexcomac, Puebla, Mexico (2, 3), and Hornachuelos, Andalusia, Spain (4), respectively.
Genomic DNA was purified with QIAamp DNA Mini Kit, Qiagen. Illumina Miseq and 454 (Mogene LC, St. Louis MO, USA) technologies were used for DNA sequencing of libraries with inserts of about 200 bp, 2 kb and 3 kb in length; paired-end reads were assembled using Newbler 2.5.3 (Roche), Velvet 1/1/06 (5), Sspace-Basic 2.0 (6), and Consed v 23 (7), with a coverage between 150× and 400×. The complete genome assembly of the R602 strain was used as a reference to finish the IE4872 and 8C-3 genomes, first by performing a whole-genome pairwise alignment with the MUMmer program (8), and second, by manual and computational curing of the assemblies, using Consed. Open reading frames (ORFs) were predicted with Glimmer 3 (9); corrections of frameshifts and manual annotations were done in Artemis 12.0 (10), with comparisons with Genbank (11), Interpro (12), and ISfinder (www-is.biotoul.fr) databases.
The R. gallicum genomes are about 7.3 to 7.4 Mb in size, with overall G+C content of 60%. They consist of a 4.1-Mb chromosome and three to four large plasmids (2, 3); one of them encodes most of the symbiosis genes (i.e., the symbiotic plasmid pSym). The average nucleotide identities (ANI) of the whole genome of the R602 strain with respect to IE4872 and 8C-3 are about 96% and 93%, respectively. A common large plasmid between 2.25 and 2.46 Mb is present in the three strains. Another small plasmid (0.17 to 0.2 Mb) is present only in R602 and IE4872 strains, but not in 8C-3. The pSym plasmids of strains R602 and IE4872 are quite similar (ANIm of 97%) over 63% of the length of the replicon, whereas the pSym of the 8C-3 strain is very similar to the pSym found in R. etli CFN42 and R. phaseoli CIAT652. Comparisons of the nod gene set of R. gallicum sv. gallicum and phaseoli symbiotic plasmids indicate key differences in the protein gene products for sulfation (NodHPQ), carbamoylation (NodU), and in the α,β unsaturation of the lipid tail at the nonreducing end (NodEF, NodA2) of the Nod factor. These differences might be associated with the extended host range in gallicum strains.
Analysis of the complete genome sequences of different symbiovars will facilitate the identification of specific genes for determining host range (13) and the genetic basis for adaptations to distinct leguminous plant species.
Accession number(s).
The complete genome sequences for the three R. gallicum strains have been deposited in NCBI Genbank under the sequence accession numbers CP006877 to CP006880, CP017101 to CP017105, and CP017241 to CP017244, for strains R602, IE4872, and 8C-3, respectively.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We appreciate the valuable technical assistance of José Espíritu, Víctor del Moral, and Laura Cervantes.
This work was supported by grants from PAPIIT-UNAM (IN 208414-3) and Conacyt (CB131499).
Footnotes
Citation Bustos P, Santamaría RI, Pérez-Carrascal OM, Acosta JL, Lozano L, Juárez S, Martínez-Flores I, Martínez-Romero E, Cevallos MA, Romero D, Dávila G, Vinuesa P, Miranda F, Ormeño E, González V. 2017. Complete genome sequences of three Rhizobium gallicum symbionts associated with common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Genome Announc 5:e00030-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00030-17.
REFERENCES
- 1.Amarger N, Macheret V, Laguerre G. 1997. Rhizobium gallicum sp. nov. and Rhizobium giardinii sp. nov., from Phaseolus vulgaris nodules. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47:996–1006. doi: 10.1099/00207713-47-4-996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Silva C, Vinuesa P, Eguiarte LE, Martínez-Romero E, Souza V. 2003. Rhizobium etli and Rhizobium gallicum nodulate common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) in a traditionally managed milpa plot in Mexico: population genetics and biogeographic implications. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:884–893. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.2.884-893.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Silva C, Vinuesa P, Eguiarte LE, Souza V, Martínez-Romero E. 2005. Evolutionary genetics and biogeographic structure of Rhizobium gallicum sensu lato, a widely distributed bacterial symbiont of diverse legumes. Mol Ecol 14:4033–4050. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02721.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rodríguez-Navarro DN, Buendía AM, Camacho M, Lucas MM, Santamaría C. 2000. Characterization of rhizobium spp. bean isolates from South-West Spain. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1601–1613. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00074-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zerbino DR, Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res 18:821–829. doi: 10.1101/gr.074492.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Boetzer M, Henkel CV, Jansen HJ, Butler D, Pirovano W. 2011. Scaffolding preassembled contigs using SSPACE. Bioinformatics 27:578–579. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gordon D, Abajian C, Green P. 1998. Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Res 8:195–202. doi: 10.1101/gr.8.3.195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kurtz S, Phillippy A, Delcher AL, Smoot M, Shumway M, Antonescu C, Salzberg SL. 2004. Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol 5:R12. doi: 10.1186/gb-2004-5-2-r12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Delcher AL, Harmon D, Kasif S, White O, Salzberg SL. 1999. Improved microbial gene identification with GLIMMER. Nucleic Acids Res 27:4636–4641. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.23.4636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rutherford K, Parkhill J, Crook J, Horsnell T, Rice P, Rajandream MA, Barrell B. 2000. Artemis: sequence visualization and annotation. Bioinformatics 16:944–945. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.10.944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Benson DA, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Sayers EW. 2009. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res 37:D26–D31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Apweiler R, Attwood TK, Bairoch A, Bateman A, Birney E, Biswas M, Bucher P, Cerutti L, Corpet F, Croning MD, Durbin R, Falquet L, Fleischmann W, Gouzy J, Hermjakob H, Hulo N, Jonassen I, Kahn D, Kanapin A, Karavidopoulou Y, Lopez R, Marx B, Mulder NJ, Oinn TM, Pagni M, Servant F, Sigrist CJ, Zdobnov EM. 2001. The InterPro database, an integrated documentation resource for protein families, domains and functional sites. Nucleic Acids Res 29:37–40. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.1.37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rogel MA, Ormeño-Orrillo E, Martínez Romero E. 2011. Symbiovars in rhizobia reflect bacterial adaptation to legumes. Syst Appl Microbiol 34:96–104. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2010.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]