Abstract
Caprine arthritis encephalitis virus (CAEV) has been reported in different countries worldwide, based on serological and molecular detection. In Argentina, the prevalence of CAEV infections is increasing, with goats showing symptoms associated mostly with cachexia and arthritis. Although in Argentina the virus has been detected by serology, it has never been isolated or characterized. Thus, the objectives of this work were to isolate and analyze the nucleotide sequences of the gag gene of Argentine CAEV strains and compare them with those of other SRLVs previously reported. Nucleotide sequence comparison showed homology with CAEV-Co, the CAEV prototype. Phylogenetic analyses showed that the Argentine strains clustered with genotype B, subtype B1. Because the molecular characterization of the gag region is suitable for phylogenetic studies and may be applied to monitor the control of SRLV, molecularly characterizing the Argentine CAEV strains may help develop a proper plan of eradication of CAEV infections.
Keywords: CAEV isolate, Caprine arthritis encephalitis virus, gag gene
Introduction
Caprine arthritis encephalitis virus (CAEV) infections in goats have been reported in different countries around the world, based on serology and molecular detection. In Argentina, the last report on the CAEV epidemiological status was based on an enzyme-linked-immunosorbent assay (ELISA) of sera collected from 2010 to 2011. That study evidenced an increase in farm goats positive for CAEV from 19.4% in 2010 to 21.5% in 2011, while the prevalence of positive animals in 2011 was 3.86% (Trezeguet et al., 2013).
CAEV infects macrophages and dendritic cells, causing immune-mediated lesions in a variety of organs and leading to lymphocyte accumulation (Blacklaws et al., 1994). Around 30 to 40% of infected animals develop clinical symptoms (Cheevers et al., 1988), associated with interstitial pneumonia, mastitis, encephalitis, and arthritis (Houwers et al., 1988; Narayan and Clements, 1989). Clinical and subclinical mastitis can lead to substantial economic losses in the goat industry (Leitner et al., 2004, 2010). However, the most common clinical manifestation of CAEV infections in goats is the arthritic form (Pugh, 2002).
CAEV is genetically and antigenically closely related to the visna-maedi virus (VMV), also known as the ovine progressive pneumonia virus. Both CAEV and VMV are grouped into small ruminant lentiviruses (SRLVs), where cross-species transmission can cause lentiviral diseases in goats and sheep (Pasick, 1998; Shah et al., 2004; Pisoni et al., 2007).
The genome of SRLVs has the typical proviral genomic organization of the genus lentivirus, family Retroviridae and subfamily Orthoretrovirinae (www.ictvonline.org). It consists of two identical single strands of the RNA (+) subunit, and contains the gag, pol and env structural genes and the tat, rev, and vif regulatory genes, flanked by non-coding long terminal repeat regions (Gifford, 2012).
The SRLVs are divided into five principal groups (A to E) according to their sequences. Genotypes A, B and E may be further distributed into different subtypes, differing in 15% to 27% of their nucleotide sequences. Thus, genotype A has been divided in several subtypes from A1 to A15, genotype B has been divided into three subtypes, B1-B3, and genotype E has only been divided in two subtypes, E1 and E2 (Shah et al., 2004). These genetic variations of the virus represent challenges in the SRLV diagnosis implementing the use of native proteins from different viral strains obtained from goats or sheep of a given region or country (De Andres et al., 2005).
Although the circulation of CAEV and the disease in Argentina have been known for more than ten years, the virus has never been isolated or characterized. Therefore, the aims of this work were to isolate and analyze the nucleotide sequences of the gag gene of the CAEV strains circulating in Argentina and compare them with those of other SRLVs previously reported.
Materials and Methods
Saanen goats belonging to five flocks from different geographic areas, located in ‘Sierras Pampeanas’ and ‘Pampa Humeda’, from Argentina, with history of CAEV infection were considered for SRLV molecular detection due to the occurrence of clinical symptoms of arthritis and cachexia (Fig. 1A and B).
Fig. 1.

(A): Saanen goat positive to CAEV with joint carpal arthritis (black arrow). (B): Saanen goat positive to CAEV with cachexia (arrow).
Blood samples with anticoagulant were collected from five goats, each representing its flock, for DNA provirus detection, while synovial fluid from one of them with joint carpal arthritis was collected for virus isolation (Fig. 1A). Peripheral blood leukocytes (PBLs) were separated by centrifugation through Histopaque™ (Sigma–Aldrich) according to the manufacturer’s protocols and kept at 4°C until DNA genomic extraction with a commercial kit (DNA Purification Kit, Promega, WI, USA). The synovial fluid from the goat with joint carpal arthritis was extracted with a sterile needle, diluted 1:5 with PBS, filtered with a 0.22-µm pore membrane and co-cultured with CAEV-negative goat synovial membrane (GSM) cells in six-well dishes. One dish was kept without infection as negative control. The cultures were maintained at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere with minimum essential medium, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, penicillin (100 U/ml), and streptomycin (100 μg/ml). After several passages, the cultures were stained with Giemsa to display cytopathic effect (CE). For RNA isolation of viral particles from the supernatant of the cell culture with CE, a commercial kit (SV RNA-Isolation System, Kit, Promega, WI, USA) was used.
To amplify the complete gag gene (1.3 kb), a hemi-nested PCR was carried out using the primers listed in Table 1. Samples with no amplification were tested by a single round of PCR to amplify a short segment of the gag gene (0.645 kb) representing 45% of the gene (Table 1). Primers for the complete gag gene were designed by DNAman software according to the CAEV-Cork (CAEV-Co) prototype of CAEV; while the PCR forward primer of the short gag region has been reported previously (Valas et al., 1997), the reverse primer was designed by the same software according to the CAEV-Co prototype of CAEV and Icelandic 1514 prototype of VMV sequences.
Table 1.
List of primers used to amplify the complete and partial gag gene in this study.
| Primers | Nucleotide sequence 5’-3’ | Location |
|---|---|---|
| gagF 331-352 | AGTAAGGTAAGTGACTCTGCT | Complete gag gene |
| gagR 1975-1995 | AATCCTTGCAGTTTTATCCTTCC | |
| gagR 2008-2028 | TTATTCCATTTTTCTCCTTCTAC | |
| gagF 959-979 | GCAGGAGGGAGAAGYTGGAA | Partial gag gene (45%) |
| gagR 1608-1628 | YCCTTCKGATCCCACATCTC | |
The reaction conditions of the first and second round of the hemi-nested PCR were: 1 cycle of the initial denaturation at 94 ºC for 5 minutes, 40 cycles of denaturation at 94 ºC for 30 seconds, annealing at 56 ºC for 30 seconds, and extension at 72 ºC for 40 seconds; followed by another extension step at 72 ºC for 10 minutes to complete the reaction. The cycle profile for the short gag gene amplification was: 1 cycle at 94 ºC for 5 minutes, 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 ºC for 30 seconds, annealing at 54 ºC for 30 seconds, and extension at 72 ºC for 40 seconds; followed by another extension step at 72 ºC for 7 minutes to complete the reaction. The PCRs were performed in a DNA Thermal Cycler (Perkin-Elmer Cetus, Norwalk, CT, USA) and the PCR reactions carried out with the PCR Master Mix according to the manufacturer’s protocols (Promega, WI, USA). The same conditions were used for reverse transcriptase activity with a previous step of 37°C for 60 min.
The amplified products were visualized on 1.5% (w/v) agarose gel and staining with ethidium bromide. Each amplified gag gene was subcloned into the pGEM-T easy vector® according to manufacturer’s protocol and sent to sequencing in an ABI3130XL Sequencer (Applied Biosystems, USA), Unidad Genómica, INTA Castelar, Argentina. The nucleotide sequences obtained were assembled and analyzed by the Bioedit software and the nucleotide compositions were compared with other strains reported in GenBank. Genetic homology and the neighbor-joining tree of the nucleotide sequences were assessed using MEGA software version 4.0
Results and Discussion
The first isolate of CAEV in Argentina was obtained from the synovial fluid extracted of the joint carpal arthritis from a goat with clinical symptoms of CAEV infection (Fig. 1). CE coincident with syncytia was observed after two passages using GSM cells (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.

Culture of goat synovial membrane (GSM) cells. (A): Non-infected cells as negative control. (B): Infected cell with synovial fluid from goat with carpal arthritis; the black arrow shows cytopathic effect (CE) coincident with syncytium after two passages (25X).
The presence of viral particles in the supernatant of the cell culture was quickly confirmed by reverse transcriptase activity by hemi-nested PCR amplifying the complete gag gene of 1.3 kb. In contrast, the amplification of the CAEV from the remaining four goats was obtained from DNA genomic provirus detected in PBLs.
Because it was not possible to amplify the complete gag gene of the virus in these goats, probably due to the variability in nucleotide composition, we amplified a product of 0.645 kb corresponding to 45 % of the gag gene. The variability in the nucleotide sequences characteristic of lentiviruses may result in a high rate of mutation, capable of forming many different strains or quasispecies (Santry et al., 2013). Thus, new primers should be designed to succeed in the amplification of the strains circulating in Argentina.
Because a gag region is suitable for phylogenetic studies and may be applied to monitor SRLV eradication programs (Santry et al., 2013), the five nucleotide sequences obtained were aligned and compared with the SRLV sequences reported in GenBank. The percentage of major homology found between the complete and short region of the gag gene showed an average of 90.5% of identity compared with CAEV-Co sequences. Moreover, the nucleotide composition of the Argentine strains showed a range of 86 to 92% identity compared to each other.
In addition, the phylogenetic trees were built using alignments of the complete (Fig. 3A) and partial gag genes (Fig. 3B).
Fig. 3.

(A): Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree using the complete gag sequence (1313 bp). (B): Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree using the partial gag sequence (645 bp). Bootstrap values are based on 1000 repetitions. SRLVs representative of each genotype and subtype according to the classification by Shah et al. (2004) were used. The sequence of the Argentine isolate is shown with a green circle. Each SRLV sequence is denoted by country and GenBank access number. Sequences of genotype B1 are shown with a box.
Our analysis was carried out by neighbor-joining algorithm to obtain the differentiation and the branching order of groups to classify the genotypes and subtypes proposed by Shah et al. (2004). In both cases, the Argentine strains were clustered together with the isolate classified as genotype B, subtype B1. Regarding the partial gag gene, the Argentine strains clustered with the reference strain CAEV-Co isolated from a goat of North America, representative of the prototype caprine lentivirus (Cork et al., 1974).
These clades were the same as those for CAEV-Philippines, Gansu-China and a strain reported in Brazil (Ravazzolo et al., 2001) (Fig. 3B). Based in these results obtained and compared with the phylogenetic distance in relation to the Icelandic 1514 strain, prototype of VMV (genotype A), the SRLV detected in this work and circulating in Argentina were identified as CAEV.
Subtype B1 has been reported to have undergone cross-species transmission from goats to sheep (Pisoni et al., 2005) and although antibodies of SRLV have also been detected in sheep flocks in Argentina (Trezeguet et al., 2013), the virus has never been characterized in this species to determine whether another genotype is circulating.
The success in preventing SRLV infection spread depends largely on early detection of infected animals in the flocks (Ramirez et al., 2013). For that, and due to the last report of prevalence in Argentina, studies should also be conducted to investigate the presence of SRLV strains circulating in sheep, especially in the case where they coexist in the same herd with goats.
In this work, we were able to isolate CAEV for the first time from naturally infected goats circulating in our country. The genetic characterization of the virus is necessary to obtain more information to implement a control method and eradication plan of CAEV infections in Argentina.
Acknowledgements
The technical assistances of Mr. Claudio Leguizamón and Mrs. Adriana Conde are highly acknowledged.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
References
- Blacklaws B A, Bird P, Allen D, McConnell I. Circulating cytotoxic T lymphocyte precursors in maedi-visna virus-infected sheep. J. Gen. Virol. 1994;75:1589–1596. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-75-7-1589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheevers W P, Knowles D P, McGuire T C, Cunningham D R, Adams D S, Gorham J R. Chronic disease in goats orally infected with two isolates of the caprine arthritis-encephalitis lentivirus. Lab. Invest. 1988;58:510–517. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cork L C, Hadlow W J, Craeford T B, Gorham J R, Piper R C. Infectious leukoencephalomyelithis of young goats. J. Infec. Dis. 1974;129:134–141. doi: 10.1093/infdis/129.2.134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Andres D, Klein D, Watt N J, Berriatua E, Torsteinsdottir S, Blacklaws B A, Harkiss G D. Diagnostic tests for small ruminant lentiviruses. Vet. Microbiol. 2005;107:49–62. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gifford R J. Viral evolution in deep time: Lentiviruses and mammals. Trends Genet. 2012;28:89–100. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2011.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Houwers D J, Pekelder J J, Akkermans J W, Van der Molen E J, Schreuder B E. Incidence of indurative lymphocytic mastitis in a flock of sheep infected with maedi-visna virus. Vet. Rec. 1988;122:435–437. doi: 10.1136/vr.122.18.435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leitner G, Krifuck O, Weisblit L, Lavi Y, Bernstein S, Merin-Lerondelle U. The effect of caprine arthritis encephalitis virus infection on production in goats. Vet. J. 2010;183:328–331. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leitner G, Merin U, Silanikove N. Changes in milk composition as affected by subclinical mastitis in goats. J. dairy Sci. 2004;87:1719–1726. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73325-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Narayan O, Clements J E. Biology and pathogenesis of lentiviruses. J. Gen. Virol. 1989;70:1617–1639. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-70-7-1617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pasick J. Maedi-visna virus and caprine arthritis-encephalitis virus: distinct species or quasispecies and its implications for laboratory diagnosis. Can. J. Vet. Res. 1998;62:241–244. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pisoni G, Quasso A, Moroni P. Phylogenetic analysis of small-ruminant lentivirus subtype B1 in mixed flocks: evidence for natural transmission from goats to sheeps. Virology. 2005;339:147–152. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2005.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pisoni G, Bertoni G, Puricelli M, Macacalli M, Moroni P. Demostration of coinfection with the recombinant by caprine arthritis encephalitis virus and maedi-visna virus in naturally infected goats. J. Virol. 2007;81:4949–4955. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00126-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pugh D G. Sheep and goat medicine. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company; 2002. p. 126. 239-240, 296, 388. [Google Scholar]
- Ramirez H, Reina R, Amorena B, De Andrés D, Martínez H A. Small Ruminant Lentiviruses: Genetic Variability, Tropism and Diagnosis. Viruses. 2013;5:1175–1207. doi: 10.3390/v5041175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ravazzolo A P, Reischak D, Peterhans E, Zanoni R. Phylogenetic analysis of small ruminant lentiviruses from Southern Brazil. Virus Res. 2001;79:117–123. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1702(01)00339-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Santry L A, De jong J, Gold A C, Walsh S R, Menzies P I, Wootton S. K. Genetic characterization of small ruminant lentivirus circulating in naturally infected sheep and goats in Ontario, Canada. Virus. Res. 2013;175:30–44. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2013.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shah C, Huder J B, Boni J, Schonmann M, Muhlherr J, Lutz H, Schupbach J. Direct evidence for natural transmission of small ruminant lentiviruses of subtype A4 from goats to sheeps and vice versa. J. Virol. 2004;78:7518–7522. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.14.7518-7522.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Trezeguet M A, Suarez M F, Barral L E, Periolo F, Maidana C E, Farías P C, Rodríguez C E, Debenedetti R T, Marcos A, Cosentino B. Epidemiological situation of maedi-visna and caprine arthritis encephalitis in Argentine. Servicio Nacional de Sanidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria (SENASA) 2013;1:1–11. [Google Scholar]
- Valas S, Benoit C, Guionaud C, Perrin G, Mamoun R.Z. North American and French caprine arthritis-encephalitis viruses emerge from ovine-visna viruses. Virology. 1997;237:307–318. doi: 10.1006/viro.1997.8800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
