Abstract
Background
Lymph node involvement could help to predict the prognosis of pathological T1 (pT1, diameters of ≤3 cm) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study assessed the clinicopathological factors and associated lymph node involvement in invasive lung adenocarcinoma (IAC) and squamous cell lung cancer (SCC) and the overall and disease-free survival associated with these factors.
Methods
Three hundred and twenty-five patients with pathological T1 NSCLC (253 IAC and 72 SCC) were retrospectively analyzed from a pool of 1094 primary lung cancer patients. The data were assessed using multiple logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable analyses.
Results
Among patients with a ≤30-mm tumor lesion (N = 325), N1 and N2 lymph node involvement was found in 28 (8.6%) and 34 (10.4%) patients, respectively. Lymph node metastasis occurred in 13.0% (33/253) of pT1 IAC patients and 40.3% (29/72) of SCC patients. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, SCC by histology, and tumor lesions larger than 1.0 cm were associated with lymph node involvement (P < 0.0001, <0.0001, and 0.048, respectively). In IAC patients, negative lymph nodes were associated with better overall survival compared with lymph node-positive ones (P = 0.021). No significant difference was observed in SCC patients regardless of lymph node status (P = 0.40). Multivariable Cox analysis revealed that lymph node involvement was an independent prognostic predictor of overall IAC patient survival (P = 0.041), but not of SCC patient survival (P = 0.470). Chemotherapy was administered to 72.2% (52/72) of SCC patients, a significantly higher rate when compared with that of IAC patients (42.3%, 107/253).
Conclusions
Lymph node metastasis was inversely associated with the overall survival of IAP patients, but not with the survival of SCC patients. Patients with pT1 SCC exhibited a significantly higher rate of lymph node involvement when compared with IAC patients. Thus, a systematic lymph node dissection should be performed in pT1 IAC patients, especially in patients with IAC larger than 1.0 cm, for additional treatment selections to improve survival.
Keywords: NSCLC, Lymph node metastasis, Pathological T1 disease, Prognosis
Background
Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality in the world [1, 2]. Cancer metastasis (e.g., lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis to other organs) significantly contributes to lung cancer patient death [3, 4]. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for up to 85% of all lung cancer cases. The vast majority of diagnosed NSCLCs are adenocarcinomas (ADCs) or squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), and the incidence of lung ADC has increased rapidly, becoming the most common histological subtype [5, 6].
The effect of clinicopathological characteristics on lung cancer lymph node metastasis in patients with pathological T1 (pT1) NSCLC remains the subject of debate, including histological subtype, tumor localization, and pleural and vascular invasion. Several previous studies reported that lung adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) exhibited 100% 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) after lung resection [7, 8]. In contrast, invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) contributes significantly to lymph node metastasis [9]. Thus, the data on lymph node metastasis from IAC should be evaluated regardless of AIS and MIA. Previous studies [10, 11] demonstrated that there was no difference in lymph node metastasis between SCC and lung adenocarcinoma, but not IAC in pT1 NSCLC. Therefore, the difference of lymph node metastasis from IAC and SCC should be fully evaluated with a tumor size less than 30 mm (stage T1). Yasuhiro et al. [12] reported that clinicopathological factors, such as tumor size, maximum standardized uptake value (SUV), and serum tumor markers, may not predict lymph node metastasis in patients with lung pT1 SCC [10]. Nevertheless, others have indicated that clinicopathological factors can be useful aids to predict the lymph node metastasis and the lymph node involvement-related prognosis in early stage NSCLC patients [11, 13]. Thus, further study is needed to assess and evaluate whether other clinicopathological characteristics could be useful predictors for lung cancer lymph node metastasis and to determine whether lymph node involvement is associated with survival of such lung cancer patients.
Thus, in this study, we identified and assessed clinicopathological factors potentially associated with lymph node metastasis. Furthermore, we characterized the prognosis of pT1 IAC and SCC patients with lymph node involvement.
Methods
Study population
In this study, we retrospectively reviewed and analyzed 1094 primary lung cancer cases that had been treated via surgical resection at Zhoushan Hospital (Zhejiang, China) between January 2007 and December 2014. All patients received routine or contrast-enhanced chest computed tomography (CT) scans (Sensation 16, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) prior to surgery. Preoperative cardiopulmonary tests, abdominal CT or abdominal ultrasonography imaging, brain magnetic resonance or brain CT imaging, and bone scanning were also performed on all patients. After surgery, NSCLC diagnosis was confirmed histologically in accordance with the World Health Organization classification system by two pathologists. Lung adenocarcinoma was classified using the new TNM-7 version IASLC/ATS/ERS staging system [6]. All patients received systematic hilar and mediastinal lymphadenectomies according to the 2011 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Lymph node N stages were determined by reviewing intraoperative frozen sections and post-surgical tissue sections of resected lymph node tissues collected during lobectomy or limited resection (segment or wedge). No patients received preoperative chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy.
We also collected relevant clinicopathological factors, including age, gender, lymphatic and vascular vessel invasion, bronchial invasion, preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, and the performance of relevant surgical procedures. CEA levels >5.0 IU/Ml were assessed as positive, as defined by the assay kit (Beckman Coulter, USA). Eighty-four patients were excluded from this study due to the presence of multiple lung lesions or other exclusion factors. Patients who met exclusion criteria included (i) 17 patients with large cell lung cancer, 10 with adenosquamous carcinoma, 6 with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma, 6 with lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma, 1 with lung pleomorphic carcinoma, and 15 with neuroendocrine tumors, (ii) 305 NSCLC patients with pathological T2–T4 stage diseases, and (iii) 325 patients with a subtype of AAH, AIS, or MIA without any lymph node metastases [7, 8]. The remaining 325 patients with pT1 (253 with IAC and 72 with SCC) were included in this study. Among the patients included in the study, there were 226 with IA stage, 1 with IB stage, 24 with IIA stage, 1 with IIB stage, and 33 with IIIA stage. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhoushan Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (Zhoushan, Zhejiang, China). All participants, or their next kin, provided written informed consent before study enrollment.
Adjuvant chemotherapy
Platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy was given to 157 patients with risk factors (such as lymph node metastasis, pleural invasion, and poor tumor differentiation) for 4 to 6 weeks after surgery. No mortality occurred in these 157 patients after adjuvant chemotherapy.
Follow-up
Follow-up examinations were conducted for all patients, and the follow-up visit occurred in our outpatient clinic at 3-month intervals for the first year and 6-month intervals thereafter. CT scans and serum CEA levels were used to assess tumor recurrence. Follow-up duration ranged from 2 to 102 months, with a mean of 36 months. The last follow-up visit occurred in the month of June in 2015. The study endpoint was patient death, or the final follow-up visit. Overall survival was defined as the time from surgery to death, or to the final follow-up visit. The length of survival was defined as the number of months from the date of surgical resection to the date of patient death, or the final follow-up visit.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences software, version 17.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Pearson’s chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test was used to estimate the statistical significance between the categorized groups. The Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess patient survival. Multivariable analyses of prognostic factors were performed using Cox’s proportional hazard regression model. All factors with univariate significance P values less than 0.05 were entered into a multivariable Cox model to estimate overall survival and lung cancer-specific survival. All statistical tests were two-sided and P value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Patient characteristics
Three hundred and twenty-five eligible patients with pathological T1 NSCLC were included in this study, including 253 (77.8%) IAC and 72 (22.2%) SCC patients. Clinicopathological characteristics are summarized in Table 1. In brief, there were 187 males and 138 females with mean age of 62 years (±9 years, range 33 to 83 years). Two hundred and eighty-eight patients (88.6%) underwent lobectomy, and 37 patients (11.4%) underwent limited resection of tumor lesions. Overall, we collected 3456 lymph nodes from these 325 patients. In 874 lymph nodes from 62 patients, 197 were identified to have tumor metastasis [197/874 (22.5%)]. Among these 62 patients, 28 (8.6%) and 34 (10.8%) had N1 and N2 lymph node involvement, respectively. The 34 patients with N2 lymph node involvement had both N1 and N2 positive lymph nodes in 19 (5.8%) and 15 (4.6%) patients who exhibited nodal skip metastasis, respectively (Table 1).
Table 1.
Lymph node involvement and clinicopathological characteristics of all pT1 patients, n (%)
| Characteristics | pN0 (n = 263) | pN1 (n = 28) | pN1+N2 (n = 19) | pN2 (n=15) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (mean), yrs. | 62 ± 9 | 61 ± 7 | 59 ± 9 | 58 ± 7 | |
| ≤60 | 101 (31.1) | 12 (3.7) | 7 (2.2) | 10 (3.1) | 0.185 |
| >60 | 162 (49.8) | 16 (4.9) | 12 (3.7) | 5 (1.5) | |
| Gender | |||||
| Male | 145 (44.6) | 22 (6.8)a | 14 (4.3) | 6 (1.8) | 0.020 |
| Female | 118 (36.3) | 6 (1.8) | 5 (1.5) | 9 (2.8) | |
| Tobacco smoking history | |||||
| Never | 147 (45.2) | 18 (5.5) | 6 (1.8)b | 9 (2.8) | 0.044 |
| Ever/current | 116 (35.7) | 10 (3.1) | 13 (4.0) | 6 (1.8) | |
| CEA level (n = 395) | |||||
| <5.0 IU/mL | 216 (66.5)c | 16 (4.9) c | 9 (2.8) | 9 (2.8) | <0.0001 |
| ≥5.0 IU/mL | 47 (14.5) | 12 (3.7) | 10 (3.1) | 6 (1.8) | |
| Tumor location | |||||
| Upper lobe | 154 (47.4) | 12 (3.7) | 10 (3.1) | 10 (3.1) | 0.150 |
| Middle lobe | 18 (5.5) | 2 (0.6) | 1 (0.3) | 2 (0.6) | |
| Lower lobe | 87 (26.8) | 12 (3.7) | 6 (1.8) | 2 (0.6) | |
| Middle-lower lobe | 4 (1.2) | 2 (0.6) | 2 (0.6) | 1 (0.3) | |
| Type of surgery | |||||
| Lobectomy | 235 (72.3) | 23 (7.1) | 17 (5.2) | 13 (4.0) | 0.720 |
| Limited resection | 28 (8.6) | 5 (1.5) | 2 (0.6) | 2 (0.6) | |
| Adjuvant chemotherapy | |||||
| No | 166 (51.1)d | 0d | 0d | 0d | <0.0001 |
| Yes | 97 (29.8) | 28 (8.6) | 19 (5.8) | 15 (4.6) | |
| Tumor size, cm | |||||
| ≤1.0 | 28 (8.6)e | 0e | 0 | 0 | 0.021 |
| 1.0–≤2.0 | 153 (47.1) | 12 (3.7) | 10 (3.1) | 7 (2.2) | |
| 2.0–≤3.0 | 82 (25.2) | 16 (4.9) | 9 (2.8) | 8 (2.5) | |
| Histology | |||||
| IAC | 220 (67.7)f | 12 (3.7)f | 10 (3.1)f | 11 (3.4)f | <0.0001 |
| SCC | 43 (13.2) | 16 (4.9) | 9 (2.8) | 4 (1.2) | |
CEA carcinoembryonic antigen, IAC invasive lung adenocarcinoma, SCC squamous cell lung cancer
aMale vs. female
bnever smoked tobacco vs. ever/current
cCEA level <5.0 IU/mL vs. ≥5.0 IU/mL
dno adjuvant chemotherapy vs. adjuvant chemotherapy
etumor size ≤1.0 vs. 1.0–≤2.0 vs. 2.0–≤3.0
fIAC vs. SCC
Among the 325 patients, 28 (8.6%) had primary pathological tumor lesions measuring ≤1.0 cm, whereas 182 (56.0%) had tumor lesions between 1.0 and 2.0 cm and 115 (35.4%) had tumor lesions between 2.0 and 3.0 cm. Patients with subcentimeter-sized tumor lesions did not exhibit lymph node metastasis. Pathologically, positive lymph nodes were present in 29 (15.9%) patients with tumor lesions between 1.0 and 2.0 cm and 33 (28.7%) of the patients with tumor lesions between 2.0 and 3.0 cm. Lymph node involvement was observed in 18.3% (33/180) of the non-smokers and 20.0% (29/145) of the smokers. Lymph node metastasis occurred in 13.0% (33/253) of pT1 IAC patients and 40.3% (29/72) of SCC patients. Significant differences in lymph node involvement (pN1, pN1+N2 or pN2) were observed in pT1 patients when the patients were segregated according to sex, preoperative CEA levels, pathological tumor size, and histology (P = 0.020, <0.0001, 0.021 and <0.0001, respectively). However, no statistical differences were observed when age, tumor location, and surgical procedures were analyzed (P = 0.185, 0.150, and 0.720, respectively).
Additionally, differences were observed in IAC and SCC patients with lymph node involvement and with a tumor lesion smaller than 30 mm. In IAC patients, preoperational CEA levels and pathological tumor size were associated with lymph node involvement (P < 0.0001 and 0.015, respectively). No association was observed between lymph node involvement and clinicopathological data in small-sized SCC (Table 2).
Table 2.
Lymph node involvement and clinicopathological characteristics of pT1 IAC and SCC patients, n (%)
| Histology | IAC | P value | SCC | P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pN0 (n = 220) | pN (+) (n = 33) | pN0 (n = 43) | pN (+) (n = 29) | |||
| Age (mean), yrs. | ||||||
| ≤60 | 90 (40.9) | 17 (51.5) | 0.263 | 11 (25.6) | 12 (41.4) | 0.201 |
| >60 | 130 (59.1) | 16 (48.5) | 32 (74.4) | 17 (58.6) | ||
| Gender | ||||||
| Male | 104 (47.3) | 15 (44.5) | 0.854 | 41 (95.3) | 27 (93.1) | 1.00 |
| Female | 116 (52.7) | 18 (54.5) | 2 (4.7) | 2 (6.9) | ||
| Tobacco smoking history | ||||||
| Never | 139 (63.2) | 20 (60.6) | 0.847 | 8 (18.6) | 5 (17.2) | 1.00 |
| Ever/current | 81 (36.8) | 13 (39.4) | 35 (81.4) | 24 (82.8) | ||
| CEA level (n = 395) | ||||||
| <5.0 IU/mL | 183 (83.2) | 14 (42.4) | <0.0001 | 33 (76.7) | 20 (69.0) | 0.587 |
| ≥5.0 IU/mL | 37 (16.8) | 19 (57.6) | 10 (23.3) | 9 (31.0) | ||
| Tumor location | ||||||
| Upper lobe | 131 (59.5) | 18 (54.6) | 0.145 | 23 (53.5) | 14 (48.3) | 0.760 |
| Middle lobe | 17 (7.7) | 3 (9.1) | 1 (2.3) | 2 (6.9) | ||
| Lower lobe | 72 (32.7) | 11 (33.3) | 15 (34.9) | 9 (31.0) | ||
| Middle-lower lobe | 0 | 1 (3.0) | 4 (9.3) | 4 (13.8) | ||
| Type of surgery | ||||||
| Lobectomy | 197 (89.5) | 27 (81.8) | 0.236 | 38 (88.4) | 26 (89.7) | 0.591 |
| Limited resection | 23 (10.5) | 6 (18.2) | 5 (11.6) | 3 (10.3) | ||
| Adjuvant chemotherapy | ||||||
| No | 146 (66.4) | 0 | <0.0001 | 20 (46.5) | 0 | <0.0001 |
| Yes | 74 (33.6) | 33 (100.0) | 23 (53.5) | 29 (100.0) | ||
| Tumor size, cm | ||||||
| ≤1.0 | 27 (12.3) | 0 | 0.015 | 1 (2.3) | 0 | 1.00 |
| 1.0–≤2.0 | 136 (61.8) | 18 (54.5) | 17 (39.5) | 11 (37.9) | ||
| 2.0–≤3.0 | 57 (25.9) | 15 (45.5) | 25 (58.2) | 18 (62.1) | ||
CEA carcinoembryonic antigen, IAC invasive lung adenocarcinoma, SCC squamous cell lung cancer
Clinicopathological data: predicting lymph node metastasis
We performed additional analysis of the association of clinicopathological factors and lymph node involvement using logistic multivariable analysis (Table 3). We found that positive CEA levels, SCC, and tumor sizes larger than 1.0 cm were significantly associated with lymph node involvement (P < 0.0001, <0.0001, and 0.048, respectively). Preoperational CEA levels and tumor size were also associated with lymph node involvement in 253 IAC patients (P < 0.0001 and 0.023, respectively). However, there was no significant association between any of the clinicopathological characteristics and lymph node involvement in SCC patients.
Table 3.
Logistic multivariable analyses for the prediction of lymph node-negative and lymph node-positive in pT1 IAC and SCC patients
| Factors | Odds ratio | 95% Confidence interval | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| IAC and SCC patients | |||
| Gender (male vs. female) | 1.333 | 0.475–3.741 | 0.580 |
| Preoperative CEA level (<5.0 vs. ≥5.0 IU/mL) | 3.647 | 1.908–6.971 | <0.0001 |
| Histology (IAC vs. SCC) | 4.286 | 2.015–9.116 | <0.0001 |
| Tumor size, cm (≤1.0 vs. >1.0–≤2.0 vs.>2.0–≤3.0) | 1.744 | 1.006–3.024 | 0.048 |
| IAC patients | |||
| Preoperative CEA level (<5.0 vs. ≥5.0 IU/mL) | 6.132 | 2.787–13.490 | <0.0001 |
| Tumor size, cm (≤1.0 vs. >1.0–≤2.0 vs. >2.0–≤3.0) | 2.227 | 1.119–4.432 | 0.023 |
CEA carcinoembryonic antigen, IAC invasive lung adenocarcinoma, SCC squamous cell lung cancer
Lymph node involvement, clinicopathological characteristics, and overall patient survival
Median overall survival was 84.8 months for pT1 patients without lymph node involvement, which was significantly longer than the median overall survival of patients with lymph node involvement (66.9 months, P = 0.006, Fig. 1a). When we examined the association between lymph node involvement and the overall survival of patients with small-sized IAC tumors or SCC, we found that IAC patients with positive lymph nodes had a median overall survival of 64.1 months. This was a shorter median overall survival when compared with patients without lymph node involvement, a median overall survival of 85.1 months (P = 0.021, Fig. 1b). In contrast, no significant difference was observed in overall survival between patients with lymph node-positive SCC and patients with lymph node-negative SCC (67.1 vs. 75.8 months; P = 0.403, Fig. 1c). Additionally, multivariable analysis revealed that lymph node involvement was an independent prognostic predictor of overall IAC patient survival (P = 0.041, Table 4). However, no statistically significant association was observed between IAC histologic types (lepidic, papillary, etc.) or CT images [pure ground-glass opacity (GGO) vs. mixed GGO vs. solid nodule] and the prognosis of IAC patients (P = 0.716, 0.366). Additionally, no significant association was observed between surgery type (lobectomy vs. sublobectomy) and the prognosis of IAC and SCC patients (P = 0.166). Additionally, no improvement in the overall survival of patients with a tumor less than 30 mm was observed in patients given adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.730 and 0.710 in IAC and SCC patients, respectively).
Fig. 1.
Kaplan-Meier curve analyses of overall survival of patients with pathological T1 IAC or SCC. Overall survival was stratified by lymph node involvement (a), IAC lymph node involvement (b), or SCC lymph node involvement (c)
Table 4.
Univariate and multivariable Cox analyses of overall IAC patient survival
| Factors | Univariate analysis | Multivariable analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard ratio | 95% Confidence interval | P value | Hazard ratio | 95% Confidence interval | P value | |
| Gender (male vs. female) | 0.495 | 0.241–1.015 | 0.055 | |||
| Preoperative CEA levels (<5.0 vs. ≥5.0 IU/mL) | 2.511 | 1.245–5.065 | 0.010 | 1.865 | 0.850–4.090 | 0.120 |
| Lymph node metastasis (absent vs. present) | 2.360 | 1.114–5.001 | 0.025 | 2.154 | 1.033–4.493 | 0.041 |
CEA carcinoembryonic antigen, IAC invasive lung adenocarcinoma
Gender (male vs. female, P = 0.028) was associated with the overall survival of pT1 patients, but not with IAC or SCC patients (P = 0.055 and 1.000, respectively). Univariate analysis showed that preoperational CEA levels were associated with the overall survival of IAC or SCC patients (P = 0.010 and 0.021, respectively). However, multivariable analysis did not confirm this result in IAC patients with tumors <30 mm (P = 0.120). Lymph node metastasis was an independent survival factor for patients with small-sized IAC (P = 0.041, Table 5).
Table 5.
Univariate and multivariable Cox analyses of overall pT1 IAC and SCC patient survival
| Factors | Univariate analysis | Multivariable analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard ratio | 95% Confidence interval | P value | Hazard ratio | 95% Confidence interval | P value | |
| Gender (male vs. female) | 0.493 | 0.263–0.926 | 0.028 | 0.525 | 0.279–0.988 | 0.046 |
| Preoperative CEA levels (<5.0 vs. ≥5.0 IU/mL) | 2.777 | 1.599–4.824 | <0.0001 | 2.455 | 1.395–4.321 | 0.002 |
| Lymph node metastasis (absent vs. present) | 2.189 | 1.239–3.866 | 0.007 | 1.736 | 0.970–3.109 | 0.063 |
CEA carcinoembryonic antigen, IAC invasive lung adenocarcinoma, SCC squamous cell lung cancer
Our data indicated no statistical difference in the survival of SCC patients with or without lymph node involvement. We also analyzed the rate of postoperative chemotherapy in patients with IAC or SCC and found that patients with SCC underwent chemotherapy at a rate of 72.2% (52/72), significantly higher than the rate of 42.3% (107/253) in IAC patients.
Discussion
In this study, we retrospectively analyzed all primary lung cancer patients who underwent treatment in our hospital between January 2007 and December 2014. Among these patients, we found no lymph node metastases in pathological T1 AIS or MIA patients, which was consistent with previous studies [7, 14]; therefore, we excluded these patients from our current study and chose to investigate the IAC and SCC subtypes of NSCLC [15]. We found that the rate of lymph node involvement was significantly higher in SCC patients when compared with the lymph node involvement in IAC patients. Multiple logistic regression analysis confirmed that SCC was significantly associated with lymph node involvement; however, lymph node involvement was not an independent prognosis factor for pT1 SCC patients. Lymph node-positive IAC was associated with poor overall survival, and lymph node involvement was an independent predictor of overall IAC survival. These results support the notion that additional studies are needed to investigate clinicopathological factors for association with lymph node involvement and NSCLC metastasis.
Previous studies have reported no significant differences in lymph node involvement between IAC and SCC, and that primary lung cancer histology predicted occult mediastinal lymph node metastasis [10, 11]. However, a previous comparative study demonstrated that 12 of 25 of non-adenocarcinoma patients had lymph node involvement [16], and this result is supported by our current study showing that pT1 SCC patients had a higher incidence of lymph node involvement when compared with IAC patients. The variability in the results reported by these different studies may be due to variations in study sample size, as well as the high incidence of IAC patients. Our current study indicated that lymph node involvement was an independent risk factor for overall IAC patient survival, and this result is supported by previous investigations [17, 18]. However, we did not observe that lymph node metastasis was a predictor of poor overall survival in SCC patients. This may be due to the limited number of SCC patients with tumors <30 mm. Furthermore, most SCC patients had a tumor lesion >20 mm and lymph node metastasis; thus, postoperative chemotherapy was given to most SCC patients. Thus, the overall survival of these patients may have been improved by this treatment. Another factor improving patient survival might be the comparatively lower malignancy of SCC relative to IAC, even though these patients had lymph node metastasis.
The systematic dissection of lymph nodes during resection of subcentimeter lung cancer is a controversial procedure. Several studies have reported subcentimeter NSCLCs that were pathologically N1 or N2 [19, 20]. Others have reported no N1 or N2 lymph node involvement in subcentimeter NSCLCs, suggesting that systematic lymph node dissection should be avoided in these cases [11, 21]. In the current study, we found that there was no lymph node metastasis in IAC or SCC patients with tumor lesions less than 1 cm. We also observed that IAC incidence was associated with tumor size. A previous study reported that the incidence of lymph node metastasis increased as tumor size increased [22]. In our study, tumor size was an independent predictor for IAC lymph node metastasis. However, lymph node involvement was independent of tumor size in SCC patients. Tsutani et al. analyzed 100 patients with clinical stage Ia SCC and reported that tumor size did not predict lymph node metastasis [12], and this result was supported by the results of our current study.
The current study observed that the incidence of lymph node involvement was higher in male patients. Furthermore, Cox regression analysis indicated that male patients had significantly poorer overall survival when compared with their female counterparts. This result is consistent with a previous study by Sakurai et al. [23]. Differences in the incidence of lymph node metastasis between male and female patients might be one reason for the different overall survival time for small-sized lung cancer; thus, further study is justified to validate this finding. Preoperative serum CEA levels were associated with IAC lymph node metastasis, but no clinical variables were associated with lymph node involvement in SCC patients. These results are supported by a previous study by Bo et al. [9] that reported that an abnormal CEA titer could predict the rate of lymph node metastasis of T1a lung adenocarcinoma patients, but not of SCC patients, which was reported by Tsutani et al. [12]. Our current study demonstrated that certain clinicopathological factors could be used to predict metastasis of pT1 lung cancer to the lymph nodes; however, the underlying mechanism of this metastasis remains unknown. Our data indicate that pT1 metastasizes to the lymph nodes even though it is an early stage NSCLC. However, further confirmation of this result is needed. Furthermore, our data showed no association between IAC subtypes and CT imaging results and the prognosis of IAC patients, which may be due to the relatively short follow-up period or the small sample size.
Certain limitations of the current study should be considered. The study was conducted solely at a single institution, and the follow-up period was short. A future multicenter study with a longer follow-up period should be performed to confirm the current findings. Additionally, due to the relatively small number of cases available, this study excluded other potentially important histological NSCLC subtypes (e.g., large cell lung cancer) that should be included in future investigations. PET scan was not used in our patients due to availability.
Conclusions
Patients with lung SCC exhibited a significantly higher rate of lymph node involvement when compared with IAC patients. Additionally, lymph node involvement was an independent prognostic factor for pT1 IAC patients. Thus, our findings suggest that a systematic lymph node dissection should be conducted in patients with IAC larger than 1.0 cm.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
This study was supported in part by grants from the Science and Technology Bureau of Zhoushan (#2011C12039, #2011C12040, #2014C31063, and #2012C13023), the Medical Bureau of Zhejiang Province (#2015ZDA032 and #2016RCB020), the Science Technology Department of Zhejiang Province (#2014C31065 and #2016C37008), the Health Ministry-Medical Bureau of Zhejiang province (#WKJ2014-2-021), the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (#LQ1H160001), and the National Spark Plan (#2012GA700152).
Availability of data and materials
Our data will not be shared temporarily because the data will be used in an additional study about NSCLC.
Authors’ contributions
WYZ, HBL, and YKZ designed and edited the manuscript of the study. WYZ and YKZ drafted the manuscript, collected and interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript. WYZ carried out the statistical analysis and critically revised the manuscript. ZDC, ZYW, and ZJC were involved in the study design, statistical analysis, and data interpretation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Authors’ information
The author Han-bo Le is the co-corresponding author.
Competing interests
The authors declare that there are no competing interests in this work.
Consent for publication
All patients enrolled in the study signed the consent for publication.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of Zhoushan Hospital of China.
Abbreviations
- ADCs
Adenocarcinomas
- AIS
Adenocarcinoma in situ
- CEA
Carcinoembryonic antigen
- CT
Computed tomography
- DFS
Disease-free survival
- IAC
Invasive adenocarcinoma
- IASLC/ATS/ERS
International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society
- MIA
Minimally invasive adenocarcinoma
- NCCN
National Comprehensive Cancer Network
- NSCLC
Non-small cell lung cancer
- pT1
Pathological T1
- SCC
Squamous cell lung cancer
- SUV
Standardized uptake value
- TNM
Tumor, node, and metastasis
Contributor Information
Yong-Kui Zhang, Email: zyk801801@126.com.
Zheng-da Chai, Email: 957834953@qq.com.
Lin-lin Tan, Email: 2390708342@qq.com.
Zhao-yu Wang, Email: 13675800526@163.com.
Zhi-jun Chen, Email: zschenzhijun@126.com.
Han-Bo Le, Email: zslehanbo@163.com.
Wang-Yu Zhu, Email: zhuwangyu24@sina.cn.
References
- 1.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:5–29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Torre LA BF, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87–108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Li H, Hu H, Wang R, Li Y, Shen L, Sun Y, et al. Lung adenocarcinoma: are skip N2 metastases different from non-skip? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;150:790–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.03.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kuroda H, Sakao Y, Mun M, Uehara H, Nakao M, Matsuura Y, et al. Lymph node metastases and prognosis in left upper division non-small cell lung cancers: the impact of interlobar lymph node metastasis. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0134674. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Herbst RS, Heymach JV, Lippman SM. Lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1367–80. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0802714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M, Nicholson AG, Geisinger KR, Yatabe Y, et al. International association for the study of lung cancer/american thoracic society/european respiratory society international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6:244–85. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318206a221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhang Y, Sun Y, Shen L, Li Y, Xiang J, Zhang Y, et al. Predictive factors of lymph node status in small peripheral non-small cell lung cancers: tumor histology is more reliable. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:1949–54. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2829-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zhang J, Wu J, Tan Q, Zhu L, Gao W. Why do pathological stage IA lung adenocarcinomas vary from prognosis?: a clinicopathologic study of 176 patients with pathological stage IA lung adenocarcinoma based on the IASLC/ATS/ERS classification. J Thorac Oncol. 2013;8:1196–202. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31829f09a7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ye B, Cheng M, Ge XX, Geng JF, Li W, Feng J, et al. Factors that predict lymph node status in clinical stage T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas. World J Surg Oncol. 2014;12:42. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nentwich MF, Bohn BA, Uzunoglu FG, Reeh M, Quaas A, Grob TJ, et al. Lymphatic invasion predicts survival in patients with early node-negative non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;146:781–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.04.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Veronesi G, Maisonneuve P, Pelosi G, Casiraghi M, Agoglia BG, Borri A, et al. Screening-detected lung cancers: is systematic nodal dissection always essential? J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6:525–30. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318206dbcc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tsutani Y, Murakami S, Miyata Y, Nakayama H, Yoshimura M, Okada M. Prediction of lymph node status in clinical stage IA squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;47:1022–6. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fukui T, Katayama T, Ito S, Abe T, Hatooka S, Mitsudomi T. Clinicopathological features of small-sized non-small cell lung cancer with mediastinal lymph node metastasis. Lung Cancer. 2009;66:309–13. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2009.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhu WY, Tan LL, Wang ZY, Wang SJ, Xu LY, Yu W, et al. Clinical characteristics and advantages of primary peripheral micro-sized lung adenocarcinoma over small-sized lung adenocarcinoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;49:1095–102. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sawabata N, Miyaoka E, Asamura H, Nakanishi Y, Eguchi K, Mori M, et al. Japanese lung cancer registry study of 11,663 surgical cases in 2004: demographic and prognosis changes over decade. J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6:1229–35. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318219aae2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Al-Sarraf N, Aziz R, Gately K, Lucey J, Wilson L, McGovern E, et al. Pattern and predictors of occult mediastinal lymph node involvement in non-small cell lung cancer patients with negative mediastinal uptake on positron emission tomography. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;33:104–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.09.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yano M, Yoshida J, Koike T, Kameyama K, Shimamoto A, Nishio W, et al. Survival of 1737 lobectomy-tolerable patients who underwent limited resection for cStage IA non-small-cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;47:135–42. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chen YY, Huang TW, Tsai WC, Lin LF, Cheng JB, Chang H, et al. Risk factors of postoperative recurrences in patients with clinical stage I NSCLC. World J Surg Oncol. 2014;12:10. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Miller DL, Rowland CM, Deschamps C, Allen MS, Trastek VF, Pairolero PC. Surgical treatment of non-small cell lung cancer 1 cm or less in diameter. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:1545–50. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(02)03525-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhou Q, Suzuki K, Anami Y, Oh S, Takamochi K. Clinicopathologic features in resected subcentimeter lung cancer—status of lymph node metastases. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010;10:53–7. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.216119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Casiraghi M, Travaini LL, Maisonneuve P, Tessitore A, Brambilla D, Agoglia BG, et al. Lymph node involvement in T1 non-small-cell lung cancer: could glucose uptake and maximal diameter be predictive criteria? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;39:e38–43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.11.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kanzaki R, Higashiyama M, Fujiwara A, Tokunaga T, Maeda J, Okami J, et al. Occult mediastinal lymph node metastasis in NSCLC patients diagnosed as clinical N0-1 by preoperative integrated FDG-PET/CT and CT: risk factors, pattern, and histopathological study. Lung Cancer. 2011;71:333–7. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2010.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sakurai H, Asamura H, Goya T, Eguchi K, Nakanishi Y, Sawabata N, et al. Survival differences by gender for resected non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective analysis of 12,509 cases in a Japanese Lung Cancer Registry study. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5:1594–601. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181f1923b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Our data will not be shared temporarily because the data will be used in an additional study about NSCLC.