Skip to main content
Applications in Plant Sciences logoLink to Applications in Plant Sciences
. 2017 Mar 14;5(3):apps.1600153. doi: 10.3732/apps.1600153

Chloroplast microsatellite markers for Pseudotaxus chienii developed from the whole chloroplast genome of Taxus chinensis var. mairei (Taxaceae)1

Qi Deng 2,3, Hanrui Zhang 2, Yipeng He 2, Ting Wang 4,5, Yingjuan Su 2,5
PMCID: PMC5357125  PMID: 28337394

Abstract

Premise of the study:

Pseudotaxus chienii (Taxaceae) is an old rare species endemic to China that has adapted well to ecological heterogeneity with high genetic diversity in its nuclear genome. However, the genetic variation in its chloroplast genome is unknown.

Methods and Results:

Eighteen chloroplast microsatellite markers (cpSSRs) were developed from the whole chloroplast genome of Taxus chinensis var. mairei and successfully amplified in four P. chienii populations and one T. chinensis var. mairei population. Of these loci, 10 were polymorphic in P. chienii, whereas six were polymorphic in T. chinensis var. mairei. The unbiased haploid diversity per locus ranged from 0.000 to 0.641 and 0.000 to 0.545 for P. chienii and T. chinensis var. mairei, respectively.

Conclusions:

The 18 cpSSRs will be used to further investigate the chloroplast genetic structure and adaptive evolution in P. chienii populations.

Keywords: chloroplast microsatellite, genetic diversity, Pseudotaxus chienii, Taxaceae, Taxus chinensis var. mairei


Taxus L. and Pseudotaxus W. C. Cheng are two closely related sister genera with similar appearance in Taxaceae (Fu et al., 1999). Their only distinction is the difference in color in the stomatal bands and aril (Fu et al., 1999). Both T. chinensis (Pilg.) Rehder var. mairei (Lemée & H. Lév.) W. C. Cheng & L. K. Fu and P. chienii (W. C. Cheng) W. C. Cheng are coniferous species endemic to China. Taxus chinensis var. mairei, in particular, has a high medicinal value because it contains the anticancer agent taxol (Li et al., 2008). Pseudotaxus chienii, the sole species in the monotypic genus, is an evergreen shrub or small tree with an average height of 4 m (Su et al., 2009). Due to overexploitation and human activities, the population size of P. chienii is shrinking. The species is categorized as an endangered species in the Red List of Endangered Plants in China (Fu and Jin, 1992). As an “old rare species,” P. chienii has adapted well to habitat fragmentation and ecological heterogeneity across a wide range of habitats and is found in Zhejiang, Jiangxi, Hunan, and Guangxi provinces (Deng et al., 2013). The previous nuclear inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) and simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers have revealed that P. chienii possesses high genetic diversity, which provides a large pool of raw material for adaptive evolution (Su et al., 2009; Deng et al., 2013). However, the level of genetic variation in the P. chienii chloroplast genome is unknown.

Chloroplast simple sequence repeat (cpSSR) markers, which have been extensively used in population genetics, possess important and unique characteristics such as haploidy, nonrecombination, uniparental inheritance, and a low nucleotide substitution rate (Ebert and Peakall, 2009). cpSSR loci are generally distributed throughout the noncoding regions with higher sequence variations and have conservative flanking regions (Huang et al., 2015). In particular, the chloroplast genome retains ancient genetic patterns and can therefore provide unique insight into evolutionary processes (Provan et al., 2001). Therefore, cpSSR markers can be used to investigate genetic variation in small, fragmented populations and can be transferred to related species (Schaal et al., 1998; Petit et al., 2005; Pan et al., 2014). More important, because cpSSRs are paternally inherited in gymnosperms, they can be used to assess pollen-mediated gene flow, population genetic variation, and phylogeographic patterns. Information revealed by cpSSRs is complementary to that obtained from nuclear SSRs (Powell et al., 1996; Provan et al., 2001). Although no chloroplast genome sequences of P. chienii have been reported, the complete chloroplast genome sequence of T. chinensis var. mairei is available in the National Center for Biotechnology Information’s GenBank (accession no. NC_020321.1). Thus, here we first isolated 18 cpSSRs in T. chinensis var. mairei, then applied 10 polymorphic markers to evaluate the genetic diversity of P. chienii. These markers will be further applied to survey the chloroplast genetic variation in P. chienii.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this study, a total of 109 individuals from four populations of P. chienii were collected throughout its natural distribution range, including Shuimenjian (Zjsmj) in Zhejiang Province, Zhangjiajie (Hnzjj) in Hunan Province, Zizhuba (Jxzzb) in Jiangxi Province, and Damingshan (Gxdms) in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China (Appendix 1). One T. chinensis var. mairei population was gathered from Fenshui (Jxfs) in Jiangxi Province. Due to its rare and endangered properties, only 11 individuals were sampled. Young leaves were collected and dried in silica gel immediately. Genomic DNA was extracted using a modified cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) protocol (Doyle and Doyle, 1987).

From the complete chloroplast genome sequence for T. chinensis var. mairei (GenBank accession no. NC_020321.1), 32 cpSSR loci were identified with the repeat threshold settings of 10 repeats for mononucleotides and five repeats for di-, tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexanucleotide cpSSRs. Based on their flanking regions, we designed 27 primers using Primer Premier 5.0 software (PREMIER Biosoft International, Palo Alto, California, USA). One individual (SMJ27) from Zjsmj population for P. chienii and one individual (FS7) from Jxfs population for T. chinensis var. mairei were selected to screen these primers. PCR was performed in a total volume of 20 μL containing 20 ng of genomic DNA, 1× PCR buffer, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTPs mixture, 0.25 μM of each primer, and 1 unit Taq polymerase (TaKaRa Biotechnology Co., Dalian, China). Reaction conditions included initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 min; followed by 35 cycles at 94°C for 1 min, annealing temperature for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min; with a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. The annealing temperature was optimized by gradient PCR (Table 1). Amplified products were separated by 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and visualized by silver staining. The allele sizes were estimated with a 50-bp DNA ladder (TaKaRa Biotechnology Co.) as size standard. Eighteen of 27 primers (approximately 67%) could produce clear bands in both P. chienii and T. chinensis var. mairei. The 18 cpSSRs were divided into three categories in terms of motif structure: 15 perfect, one imperfect, and two compound repeats. The high frequency of perfect repeats was in accordance with Ebert’s description (Ebert and Peakall, 2009).

Table 1.

Characteristics of 18 cpSSR markers developed for Taxus chinensis var. mairei.

Locus Primer sequences (5′–3′) Repeat motif Ta (°C) Product size (bp) Locationc
PTC-cp01a,b F: CACCATCCACTGCCTTTG (AT)9 54 168 trnH-GUG-trnI-CAU (337–354)
R: GTGCGGTCAGAACTTGTCA
PTC-cp02b F: TGCGTGGCTGTGAGATG (AC)5 54 213 trnT-trnE (21,944–21,953)
R: GCGGAACCCGTAGTGAA
PTC-cp03 F: AAGCCGCCCTGTTTTA (TA)5(AT)5 54 232 trnC-GCA-rpoB (25,696–25,715)
R: ATCTCATCGCATTGGAAGT
PTC-cp04b F: TGTGGCACTATCCAAGGTC (AT)5 54 135 rpoC2 (32,846–32,855)
R: GCGTGGCAATACATCTCC
PTC-cp05 F: TGAACAGGTCCGACAGCA (A)11TACAA(AT)5 55 376 atpF-atpA (39,353–39,378)
R: CCATCCCATCTCCTACTTGA
PTC-cp08 F: TGATGAGTGCCGCCTAAT (AT)5AGAAGTATACTTC(TA)5 54 173 rpl36-rps11 (57,373–57,405)
R: CGGGGAACTAATCTTCTTGT
PTC-cp09a F: TGTATCAACCAATGCTTCC (TC)6 54 273 psbT-psbB (62,807 – 62,818)
R: ATTCATAGATGTTTTCGCTG
PTC-cp13b F: AGTCCAAAATCTCCCACAC (AT)5 54 180 ndhF (104,893–104,902)
R: CTTCTTCAATGCTTCTATGCT
PTC-cp15 F: GCTTGGACCCATTGTTGAA (A)10 55 279 rpoC1-rpoC2 (32,043–32,052)
R: CATACTTTAGGTGGCGTTGTTA
PTC-cp16a,b F: CCCATACTCCCATTTCATAACTT (A)10 55 237 rpoC2 (34,060–34,069)
R: AGCACTTGCCCAGGACTAACT
PTC-cp18a,b F: TCCAGGTGCTGATGCTACTAA (A)10 55 186 rpoC2-atpI (35,652–35,661)
R: TCGTGCTGCTTCTTTCTTTG
PTC-cp21b F: GGTGGGGTGGGAACG (A)10 55 306 rpl32 (106,169–106,178)
R: TTGGGTGAGCCATAGAAAT
PTC-cp22a,b F: AGCAATGTTTGGAAGGGAA (A)10 55 130 rpl32-trnP-GGG (106,257–106,266)
R: GGTGTAGTCTATTTGGTGGTGTT
PTC-cp23b F: AACTAATCCCAATGGCTTCA (T)10 55 301 ycf3 intron (9378–9387)
R: CCCTATGCGTGCCTATCA
PTC-cp26a,b F: TGGATAGGACCCATAACAGG (T)10 55 326 ycf4 (65,483–65,492)
R: AAACTACGGCGATTTCTTC
PTC-cp28 F: TGTAGTTTGCCGAGTGGTT (T)11 55 336 psbE-petL (70,723–70,733)
R: AATAATAGTAGACATTGGAAGGAC
PTC-cp29a,b F: AATAGGTTCTGGAGCGGTTA (T)11 55 254 rps8 (75,439–75,449)
R: AGATTTAGTTCGTCACGGGTA
PTC-cp32a,b F: CCTCGTGCGGATAACTAAA (TCTTCC)7 55 284 rps15-chlN (121,797–121,838)
R: TGGCAAAGATTCCCTGG

Note: Ta = annealing temperature.

a

Monomorphic loci for Pseudotaxus chienii.

b

Monomorphic loci for T. chinensis var. mairei.

c

Locus location (genic or intergenic region); the position amplified by the primers in the T. chinensis var. mairei chloroplast genome is given in parentheses.

The utility of these 18 cpSSR primers was further examined in 109 and 11 individuals of P. chienii and T. chinensis var. mairei, respectively. The PCR reactions were conducted as described above. Among these loci, 10 (PTC-cp02, PTC-cp03, PTC-cp04, PTC-cp05, PTC-cp08, PTC-cp13, PTC-cp15, PTC-cp21, PTC-cp23, and PTC-cp28) showed polymorphisms in P. chienii, whereas six (PTC-cp03, PTC-cp05, PTC-cp08, PTC-cp09, PTC-cp15, and PTC-cp28) were polymorphic in T. chinensis var. mairei (Table 1). The genetic parameters, including the number of alleles (A), haploid diversity (h), and unbiased haploid diversity (hunb) for each population, were evaluated with GenAlEx version 6.41 (Peakall and Smouse, 2006). Ten polymorphic cpSSR loci for P. chienii and six polymorphic loci for T. chinensis var. mairei were used. For P. chienii, A was between one and four, h ranged from 0.000 to 0.620, and hunb varied from 0.000 to 0.641 (Table 2). Population Zjsmj revealed obviously higher diversity than other populations. For T. chinensis var. mairei, A, h, and hunb were one to three, 0.000–0.496, and 0.000–0.545, respectively (Table 2).

Table 2.

Genetic properties of 10 polymorphic cpSSR loci for Pseudotaxus chienii and six polymorphic loci for Taxus chinensis var. mairei.a

Pseudotaxus chienii Taxus chinensis var. mairei
Zjsmj (n = 30) Gxdms (n = 30) Hnzjj (n = 19) Jxzzb (n = 30) Jxfs (n = 11)
Locus A h hunb A h hunb A h hunb A h hunb A h hunb
PTC-cp02 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 2 0.320 0.331 NAc NAc NAc
PTC-cp03 2 0.180 0.186 1 0.000 0.000 2 0.188 0.199 1 0.000 0.000 2 0.165 0.182
PTC-cp04 2 0.180 0.186 1 0.000 0.000 2 0.100 0.105 2 0.064 0.067 NAc NAc NAc
PTC-cp05 3 0.127 0.131 3 0.127 0.131 2 0.100 0.105 1 0.000 0.000 3 0.430 0.473
PTC-cp08 2 0.498 0.515 3 0.504 0.522 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 2 0.463 0.509
PTC-cp09 NAb NAb NAb NAb NAb NAb NAb NAb NAb NAb NAb NAb 2 0.463 0.509
PTC-cp13 3 0.504 0.522 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 NAc NAc NAc
PTC-cp15 3 0.418 0.432 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 2 0.496 0.545
PTC-cp21 1 0.000 0.000 2 0.124 0.129 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 NAc NAc NAc
PTC-cp23 2 0.124 0.129 2 0.064 0.067 2 0.100 0.105 2 0.124 0.129 NAc NAc NAc
PTC-cp28 4 0.620 0.641 3 0.184 0.191 3 0.421 0.444 2 0.320 0.331 2 0.463 0.509

Note: A = number of alleles; h = haploid diversity; hunb = unbiased haploid diversity; n = number of individuals sampled.

a

Voucher and locality information are provided in Appendix 1.

b

No analysis performed because PTC-cp09 was monomorphic in P. chienii.

c

No analysis performed because PTC-cp02, PTC-cp04, PTC-cp13, PTC-cp21, and PTC-cp23 were monomorphic in T. chinensis var. mairei.

Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) was performed to measure genetic differentiation and the ratio of genetic variations within and among P. chienii populations in Arlequin version 3.5 (Excoffier and Lischer, 2010). The results revealed significant difference in partitioning of variation among and within populations (29.03% and 70.97%, respectively; Table 3) and uncovered significant genetic differentiation among all populations (FST = 0.2903).

Table 3.

The analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) within and among populations based on 10 polymorphic cpSSRs in Pseudotaxus chienii.

Source of variation df Sum of squares Variance components Percentage of variation P value
Among populations 3 22.880 0.25926 29.03% <0.0001
Within populations 105 66.542 0.63373 70.97% <0.0001
Total 108 89.422 0.893 100.00%

Note: df = degrees of freedom.

CONCLUSIONS

The polymorphic chloroplast SSR loci developed from T. chinensis var. mairei in this study were verified to be reliable for assessing genetic variation of P. chienii populations. Combined with the nuclear SSR loci previously developed (Deng et al., 2013), the 18 cpSSRs will contribute to further exploration of whether the adaptation of P. chienii to environmental heterogeneity is driven through nuclear or chloroplast loci. In addition, the conservative nature of cpDNA may allow these markers to be used in other conifers.

Appendix 1.

Collection locality and voucher information for Pseudotaxus chienii and Taxus chinensis var. mairei populations used in this study.

Species Population code Collection locality Geographic coordinates Voucher specimena
Pseudotaxus chienii (W. C. Cheng) W. C. Cheng Zjsmj Shuimenjian, Zhejiang Province 28°43′42″N, 118°57′32″E YJ Su 201303, SMJ27
Pseudotaxus chienii Jxzzb Zizhuba, Jiangxi Province 26°27′18″N, 114°06′22″E YJ Su 201303, ZZB12
Pseudotaxus chienii Hnzjj Zhangjiajie, Hunan Province 29°23′12″N, 110°28′56″E YJ Su 201303, ZJJ09
Pseudotaxus chienii Gxdms Damingshan, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 23°29′54″N, 108°26′12″E YJ Su 201303, DMS17
Taxus chinensis (Pilg.) Rehder var. mairei (Lemée & H. Lév.) W. C. Cheng & L. K. Fu Jxfs Fenshui, Jiangxi Province 28°56′31″N, 108°02′12″E WB Liao 201108, FS1
a

Voucher specimens are deposited at the herbarium of Sun Yat-sen University (SYSU).

LITERATURE CITED

  1. Deng Q., Su Y. J., Wang T. 2013. Microsatellite loci for an old rare species, Pseudotaxus chienii, and transferability in Taxus wallichiana var. mairei (Taxaceae). Applications in Plant Sciences 1: 1200456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Doyle J. J., Doyle J. L. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11–15. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ebert D., Peakall R. 2009. Chloroplast simple sequence repeats (cpSSRs): Technical resources and recommendations for expanding cpSSR discovery and applications to a wide array of plant species. Molecular Ecology Resources 9: 673–690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Excoffier L., Lischer H. E. L. 2010. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Molecular Ecology Resources 10: 564–567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fu L. G., Jin J. M. 1992. Red list of endangered plants in China. Science Press, Beijing, China. [Google Scholar]
  6. Fu L. G., Li N., Mill R. R. 1999. Taxaceae. In Z. Y. Wu and P. H. Raven [eds.], Flora of China, vol. 4, 89–98. Science Press, Beijing, China, and Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. [Google Scholar]
  7. Huang J., Yang X. T., Zhang C. M., Yin X., Liu S. P., Li X. G. 2015. Development of chloroplast microsatellite markers and analysis of chloroplast diversity in Chinese jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.) and wild jujube (Ziziphus acidojujuba Mill.). PLoS ONE 10: e0134519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Li C. F., Huo C. H., Zhang M. L., Shi Q. W. 2008. Chemistry of Chinese yew, Taxus chinensis var. mairei. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 36: 266–282. [Google Scholar]
  9. Pan L., Li Y., Guo R., Wu H., Hu Z. H., Chen C. Y. 2014. Development of 12 chloroplast microsatellite markers in Vigna unguiculata (Fabaceae) and amplification in Phaseolus vulgaris. Applications in Plant Sciences 2: 1300075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Peakall R., Smouse P. E. 2006. GenAlEx 6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 288–295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Petit R. J., Duminil J., Fineschi S., Hampe A., Salvini D., Vendramin G. G. 2005. Comparative organization of chloroplast, mitochondrial and nuclear diversity in plant populations. Molecular Ecology 14: 689–701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Powell W., Machray G. C., Provan J. 1996. Polymorphism revealed by simple sequence repeats. Trends in Plant Science 1: 215–222. [Google Scholar]
  13. Provan J., Powell W., Hollingsworth P. M. 2001. Chloroplast microsatellites: New tools for studies in plant ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16: 142–147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schaal B. A., Hayworth D. A., Olsen K. M., Rauscher J. T., Smith W. A. 1998. Phylogeographic studies in plants: Problems and prospects. Molecular Ecology 7: 465–474. [Google Scholar]
  15. Su Y. J., Wang T., Ouyang P. Y. 2009. High genetic differentiation and variation as revealed by ISSR marker in Pseudotaxus chienii (Taxaceae), an old rare conifer endemic to China. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 37: 579–588. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applications in Plant Sciences are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES