Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience logoLink to Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
. 2017 Mar 20;9:64. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00064

Brain Transcriptome Sequencing of a Natural Model of Alzheimer's Disease

Francisco Altimiras 1,2,*,†, Barbara Uszczynska-Ratajczak 3,4,†, Francisco Camara 3,4, Anna Vlasova 3,4, Emilio Palumbo 3,4, Stephen Newhouse 5, Robert M J Deacon 6,7, Leandro A E Farias 1, Michael J Hurley 8, David E Loyola 9, Rodrigo A Vásquez 10, Richard Dobson 5, Roderic Guigó 3,4,*, Patricia Cogram 6,7,*
PMCID: PMC5357652  PMID: 28373841

Introduction

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a slowly progressive disease characterized by impairment of memory and eventually by disturbances in reasoning, planning, language, and perception. Ageing is the greatest risk factor for its development but mutations in amyloid precursor protein (APP), apolipoprotein E (APOE), microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) among others, are also a major factor (Blasko et al., 2004). The symptoms of AD result from neurofibrillary tangles that are composed of aggregates of hyper-phosphorylated tau protein and an increase in the production of amyloid-beta (Aβ) protein in the brain that leads to deposits of senile plaques. As such, there is a worldwide effort to find an effective disease-modifying treatment that can reverse symptoms and/or delay onset of the disease. Transgenic mouse models exist that mimic a range of AD–related pathologies, although none of the models fully replicate all pathological features of the human disease (Birch et al., 2014). Drugs developed using these mouse models have failed in phase III clinical trials (Mangialasche et al., 2010; Braidy et al., 2012; Saraceno et al., 2013). These failures question not only our accurate understanding of the disease (Castellani and Perry, 2012) but also the validity of the animal models upon which the drug discovery efforts are rooted (Windisch, 2014; Nazem et al., 2015).

Animal models have contributed significantly to our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of AD. To date, however, these findings have not resulted in target validation in humans and successful translation to disease-modifying therapies. The Octodon degus (O. degus) is a model that naturally integrates multiple AD pathological hallmarks like tau fibrilary tangles and β-amyloid deposits (Inestrosa et al., 2005, 2015; Deacon et al., 2015). The Aβ peptide sequence in O. degus is 97.5% homologous to the human Aβ peptide sequence (Inestrosa et al., 2005). The species presents acetylcholine (AChE)-rich pyramidal neurons in their forebrain, which decline in numbers during the progression to an AD-like behavioral state, similar to that seen in AD patients (Ardiles et al., 2012). Affected O. degus also present the characteristic medical signs and symptoms surrounding AD like macular degeneration, diabetes and circadian rhythm dysfunction (Laurijssens et al., 2013). Behavioral experiments have shown that the O. degus can also present behavioral deficits and neural alterations in the frontal cortex and aggression similar to those seen in patients with AD (Tarragon et al., 2013). Most importantly, the O. degus shows a correlation of expression with human AD- related genes making this model a powerful tool to characterize the effects of novel treatments for AD and identify new therapeutic targets. Our findings advance the use of the O. degus as an effective tool for AD research.

Materials and methods

Animals

In this study O. degus (Rodentia: Octodontidae) were captured from a natural population in central Chile, 30 km west of Santiago (Rinconada de Maipú, RM). In this environment, degus typically breed once per year in late autumn (May-June), with conceptions in late winter to early spring (September-October). The animals were captured as juveniles during early austral summer (November), when degus are 2–3 months old, with mesh made traps with a Sherman-trap type mechanism. Juveniles corresponded to individuals weighing 70–130 g (females) or 70–140 g (males), and hence it is possible to differentiate them categorically from adults, which weight above 130 g for females, 140 g for males (Ebensperger and Hurtado, 2005; Correa et al., 2016).

They were housed in standard metal cages 50 × 40 × 35 cm with a layer of wood shaving as bedding and containing a small metallic box (25 × 15 × 10 cm with a single entrance), under natural photoperiod (12 h light/dark; starting 7 a.m.) and in an air-conditioned animal facility at the Faculty of Sciences, University of Chile (Santiago, Chile). They were fed with a commercial rodent diet (Prolab RMH 3000, Lab diet). Water and food were provided ad libitum during the entire experimental period. Behavioral assessment of a population (N = 84) of 3-years old O. degus was performed using the burrowing test in an earlier work (Deacon et al., 2015), to address behavioral dysfunctions in activities of daily living (ADL) (Deacon, 2006, 2014). The population was divided in terms of burrowing performance into two groups: poor-burrowers (PB) and good-burrowers (GB). Brain extract samples were obtained from 8 females (four per each group). Brain soluble Aβ1−42peptide was determined for these 8 animals by MALDI-TOF MS as described in earlier work (Deacon et al., 2015). Samples were classified according to burrowing performance and brain soluble Aβ1−42 levels. Samples from four PB animals, with an increased level of soluble brain Aβ1−42 (AD-like group), and three samples from GB animals (with soluble levels of Aβ1−42 used as control group) were used for further analysis. Brain tissues were frozen directly in RNAlater solution (Ambion) and stored at −80°C until use. All procedures of capture, transportation, maintenance and experimentation followed the recommendations of the ethics committee of the Faculty of Sciences of the University of Chile, and complied with Chilean regulations (SAG-Chilean Agriculture and Livestock Service) as well as recommendations by the Animal Behavior Society.

Total RNA and mRNA isolation

For total RNA extraction, PureLinkTM RNA Mini kit (Ambion, Life Technologies) was used according to the manufacturer's instructions. For genomic DNA digestion, RNase-Free DNase I (Ambion) was used. Total RNA samples were quantified in a Nanodrop 2000 spectrophotometer and integrity was evaluated by agarose gels electrophoresis with a standard protocol. For mRNA isolation from total RNA samples, MicroPoly(A) Purist kit was used according to the manufacturer's instructions. For sizing, quantitation and quality control of mRNA Bioanalyzer system (Agilent) was used, discarding samples with an RIN < 7.

RNA-sequencing

RNA-seq was performed at the National Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics (Santiago, Chile) including library preparation (using SOLiD Total RNA-seq kit), fragmentation and PCR enrichment of target mRNA according to strand-specific protocols. Two batches of paired-end (75 × 35 bp) library sequencing were done in a SOLiD 5,500 × l system (Applied Biosystems).

Gene prediction

We combined both ab initio and evidence-based approaches by using the Program to Assemble Spliced Alignments (PASA) and Evidence Modeler (EVM) to de novo annotate protein coding genes in O. degus genome assembly (v1.0) (Haas, 2003). In total 25,621 transcript models were generated by PASA from an initial set of 1,767,640 sequences including (1) 26,240 O. degus mRNA transcripts and (2) 1,741,759 ESTs and mRNA sequences from four species of rodents: mouse, guinea pig, Chinese hamster and rat. Transcript sequences for all five species were derived from the GenBank NCBI databases. We also used >30 million UniRef90 protein clusters and 26,259 highly curated rodent-specific Swiss-Prot proteins that were split-mapped to the O. degus genome by using SPALN2 (Iwata and Gotoh, 2012) and EXONERATE (Slater and Birney, 2005) with mouse-specific parameters. The protein-coding gene predictions were obtained on the latest repeat-masked reference assembly of the O. degus genome by using the existing mammalian-specific parameter files of four ab initio gene prediction programs: Augustus, Geneid, SGP2, and SNA (Guigó et al., 1992; Guigo et al., 2003; Parra et al., 2003; Stanke et al., 2006a,b). For SGP2, TBLASTX (Altschul, 1997) alignments between human (hg38) and O. degus were additionally used to improve the accuracy of gene predictions (Table S1). We also used external evidence for Geneid including PASA-derived introns, while for Augustus we used both PASA-derived intron and exon hints. Performance of all programs with and without external evidence was evaluated for accuracy on an artificial scaffold made up of 238 concatenated O. degus transcripts taken from the NCBI reference annotation. The alignments (transcript and protein) and ab initio gene models were combined into consensus CDS models using Evidence Modeler (Haas et al., 2008). The initial gene set was filtered to remove reference gene models supported exclusively by SNAP ab initio predictions. The single-exon consensus gene models derived from predictions solely supported by Geneid, SGP2 or AUGUSTUS with length < 300 nucleotides and an EVM score < 5 were also excluded. The weights of each given source were chosen empirically and based on suggestions contained in the EVM documentation. The highest weights were given to transcript alignments, followed by protein alignments and finally ab initio predictions (Augustus, Geneid, SGP2, and SNAP, Table S2). The consensus gene models were loaded into the PASA database and passed through five rounds of annotation updates to add UTRs and alternative splicing variants (Table S3).

Functional annotation

Predicted protein-coding genes in the O. degus genome were further functionally annotated using an in-house developed, automatic pipeline. For each protein sequence we assigned protein signatures, orthology groups, as well as annotated metabolic pathways and reactions using an orthology-based approach. In this analysis we used InterProScan v.5 (Zdobnov and Apweiler, 2001) to scan though all available InterPro databases, including PANTHER, Pfam, TIGRFAM, HAMAP, and SUPERFAMILY and to specify different protein coding signatures in predicted protein coding genes. The protein signatures (protein families, regions, domains, repeats and sites) were further employed to investigate the classification and to assign biological functions to predicted proteins. Blast2GO (Götz et al., 2008) analysis was used to identify GO terms for the predicted proteins, while KEGG Automatic Annotation Server (KAAS) (Moriya et al., 2007) was employed to compare protein sequences against KEGG (Kanehisa et al., 2012, 2014) orthology (KO). In this analysis, KASS applied its bi-directional best hit (BBH) method in homology search against a representative gene set from 33 different species, including Mus musculus and Cricetulus griseus. KO identifiers were then used to retrieve the KEGG relevant functional annotation, such as metabolic pathways and external database references. In addition, we assigned the NCBI gene names from the O. degus reference NCBI annotation (ref_OctDeg1.0) to the predicted genes. This was done by taking NCBI gene names from the corresponding, NCBI annotated proteins, showing full sequence similarity. The sequence similarity was measured by assigning SHA1 checksum to each protein in both proteomes, followed by comparing those sums.

Mapping O. degus brain RNA-seq samples

The O. degus RNA Sequences were aligned to a reference transcriptome obtained from the masked primary genome assembly version 1.0 (WGS Project: AJSA01) and the EVM-based genome annotation. The transcriptome sequence was prepared using RSEM version 1.2.12 (Li and Dewey, 2011) and projected from base space to SOLiD color space using SHRiMP version 2.2.3 (Rumble et al., 2009). The latter program was also employed to align SOLiD 75 × 35 bp pair-end sequenced reads to the reference transcriptome according to the following non-default parameters: -h 80% -o 10 -p opp-in –no-half-paired.

Mapping human brain RNA-seq samples

The RNA-seq data set consisting of 6 human brain samples (3 AD subjects and 3 controls, University of Kentucky brain bank) was derived from the National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Archive database (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra, accession no. SRA060572). Next, pair-end reads were mapped to the human reference transcriptome using our in-house pipeline that combines STARv.2.4.0.1 (Dobin et al., 2013) and RSEM version 1.2.12 (Table S4). The reference transcriptome was obtained from human reference genome hg38 and GENCODE v21 (Harrow et al., 2012) as a reference annotation.

Expression profiling of human and O. degus brain samples

The number of reads mapped to each gene was calculated using SAMtools (Li et al., 2009). The statistical significance of expression profile for each gene between two groups was determined using edgeR, an open source R/Bioconductor package (Robinson et al., 2010). In this study, to estimate the significance of gene expression difference between AD or AD-like (PB) subjects and human controls or O. degus (GB) controls, the absolute value of log2 Ratio (logFC ≥ 1), log read count per million reads (logCPM > 1) and FDR < 0.05 were used as a criterion. Raw gene reads counts were also normalized to RPKM values (reads per kilobase per million mapped reads) using the RPKM formula described by Mortazavi et al. (2008).

GO enrichment analysis for differentially expressed genes

Functional enrichment analysis for O. degus was performed using Fisher's exact test implemented in R programming language. The GO enrichment analysis for human was also done using R. The GOstats package was used to detect the significantly enriched GO terms for DEGs, which were compared to the full GENCODE 21 gene set. For both species, we further analyzed top 20 GO terms ranked by p-value with p < 0.05.

Results

Gene prediction and functional annotation

With the aim to enrich the current version of O. degus genome annotation with the new data obtained in this study, we performed de novo protein coding gene annotation. Our Evidence-Modeler (EVM) based annotation of repeat-mask O. degus genome (v1.0) resulted in prediction of 31,739 protein-coding genes, corresponding to 36,866 predicted transcripts and 36,575 proteins. The comparison of EVM-based and NCBI reference annotation revealed that the number of protein coding genes increased by 1.52-fold from 20,779 (NCBI) to 31,739 (EVM-based). Similar 1.40-fold change was reported for protein coding transcripts (26,248 for NCBI and 36,866 for EVM-based annotation) (Table S3).

Each protein sequence was functionally annotated using the in house automated pipeline. Annotation features were assigned to a total of 35,618 (97%) proteins, 30,661 (97%) genes), of these 29,847 (82%) of the proteins were assigned some GO terms (Tables S5, S6, Figures S1, S2). This functional annotation, including GO terms and KEGG orthology groups, allowed us to perform enrichment analysis for genes of interest.

The brain transcriptome of AD-like O. degus

After mapping the reads to the O. degus genome, we performed pairwise comparisons to measure the gene expression level differences between AD-like subjects and controls. As a result 54 DEGs were identified between those two groups. Statistical analysis revealed 29 genes to be up- and 25 to be down-regulated in our study (Table S10). The relative change in gene expression levels across AD-like and control samples is shown in Figure 1A.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(A) Expression (FPKM values) analysis of 54 differentially expressed genes in PB group compared to GB group with two-way clustering applied. (B) Complete list of KEGG pathways corresponding to 29 up- and 25 down-regulated genes between PB and GB. Columns A and C: KEGG entry for up- and down-regulated genes, Columns B and D: Pathway names for up- and down-regulated genes. (C) Comparison of differentially expressed genes in PB vs. GB and AD-related human genes. Overall AD-correlated genes and AD-correlated genes with incipient AD stage.

To determine the function of DEGs, a Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis was performed (Table S7). The up-regulated genes were enriched notably in chromosome related processes, which include chromosome condensation and chromosome organization. GO results showed also that up-regulated genes were largely involved in amine biosynthesis, in particular biosynthesis of polyamines. In contrast, most down-regulated genes were mainly engaged in ion homeostasis related processes, such as sodium-independent organic anion transport, hyperosmotic salinity response or regulation of cellular pH reduction. To fully determine which pathways could be directly affected in AD, DEGs were analyzed using KEGG PATHWAY Database (Braidy et al., 2012). The up-regulated genes were observed to be mainly part of signaling pathways including MAPK, Rap1, Ras and neurotransmission (cholinergic synapse), while down-regulated genes were part of pathways related to AD, Parkinson's disease and Huntington's disease (Figure 1B). Specifically down-regulation of COX8A gene. The COX8A encodes subunit VIIIA of cytochrome c oxidase, a crucial element for the formation of complex IV, which is a part of electron transport chain (ETC) in mitochondria. This is consistent with previously published data, as AD has been already linked to low activity of brain cytochrome c oxidase (Alleyne et al., 2011; Readnower et al., 2011). A substantial number of other down-regulated genes were also found to participate in different metabolic pathways.

Comparison of human and O. degus AD-like brain transcriptomes

To gain insights to how O. degus could be employed as a natural model for studying the pathogenesis of AD, a human AD brain transcriptome was analyzed using RNA-seq data derived from hippocampus tissue of AD subjects and controls (Bai et al., 2013). Analysis of DEGs resulted in identification of 1,572 up and 1,391 down-regulated genes, which were further compared to DEGs identified for O. degus (Table S8). This comparison revealed overlap between seven genes, including FGF9, WISP1 and CPNE7 that are known to be linked with AD. Both FGF9 and WISP1 were observed to show the opposite expression changes for human and O. degus, while the altered expression of CPNE7 was consistent between both species. Other common DEGs included one up-regulated gene: ITGBL1, and two down-regulated genes: C1orf95, LRRC55, as well as IL1RAPL2, which was down-regulated in O. degus brain and up-regulated in human hippocampus. To further compare human and O. degus AD-like brain transcriptomes, GO enrichment was employed. GO analysis revealed that that up-regulated genes for human were mainly involved in system and tissue development, in particular circulatory system and vasculature development (Table S9). This is to some extend consistent with biological processes described for O. degus up-regulated genes, as majority of enriched terms were biosynthesis related. Down-regulated genes were significantly enriched in neurological processes including signal transduction and neurogenesis. Similar to O. degus, AD affects glutamate secretion and glutamate receptor signaling pathways in human brain. Interestingly, genes involved in regulation of ion transport was also affected, supporting the relationship between cellular stress signals and AD.

Comparison of O. degus DEGs and human AD-related genes

To investigate the potential role of O. degus DEGs in human AD progression, we compared our results to a set of AD-related genes, generated using Affymetrix expression microarrays across different stages of human AD: incipient, moderate and severe, as well as control samples (Blalock et al., 2011). AD-related genes were defined as genes, whose expression was positively or negatively correlated with results of MiniMental Status Examination (MMSE) and neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) counts across three AD categories (Blalock et al., 2004). Interestingly, five O. degus DEGs could be linked to AD-related genes in all subjects (overall correlation) this included COX16, APOC1, ITGBL1, FGF9, and AMD1. All five DEGs correlated with MMSE scores, while three: ITGBL1, FGF9, and AMD1 were both MMSE and NFT-correlated. However, only AMD1 showed a similar correlation with incipient AD (Figure 1C).

Discussion

The purpose of the present study was to characterize the brain transcriptome of the O. degus to support its use as a natural model of AD, by comparing the transcriptomes of AD-like and healthy O. degus. This study is, to the best of our knowledge, the first report of O. degus brain whole transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq). Our results revealed in O. degus a number of genes previously implicated in AD and related disorders indicating that this model is a suitable alternative to transgenic mice models for AD research. Because the AD-pathology can vary widely with animal age we carefully matched control and AD-like groups. Animals aged 3 years have optimal AD-like pathology development namely, the presence of beta-amyloid deposits as has been previously reported (Inestrosa et al., 2005; Ardiles et al., 2012; Deacon et al., 2015). This allowed for an acceptable signal dynamic for the experimental analysis. The sample size used for this study was calculated on the magnitude of the biological effect and the inherent variability of the target being measured, in this case the presence or absence of beta-amyloid deposits. We also considered the variability in the behavioral measures, which as previously reported (Deacon et al., 2015) showed clustering in two cohort of animals, AD-like and controls in the tests of daily living.

This work has identified up-regulated genes involved in AD including the CHRNA6 gene, which encodes a sub-type of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor widely associated to AD, which are mostly linked to Aβ aggregation theory and that was found previously affected in AD patients (Lombardo and Maskos, 2015). Another DEG AMD1 (which encodes an intermediate enzyme relevant to the polyamine biosynthesis) has an altered activity in AD and has also been implicated in schizophrenia and mood disorders, and was found up-regulated in affected AD-like O. degus (Morrison et al., 1993; Fiori and Turecki, 2008). The down-regulated genes found in the brains of AD-like O. degus included WNT1 inducible signaling pathway protein 1 (WISP1) (Varela-Nallar and Inestrosa, 2013). This gene previously implicated in neurodegeneration by regulation of mitochondrial signaling and apoptosis is a downstream target in the Wnt1 signaling pathway (Wang et al., 2012). Wnt signaling that involves Wnt1 and WISP1 is becoming recognized as a vital neuroprotective component during AD. WISP1 stops p53 mediated DNA damage and apoptosis offering neuronal protection by blocking cytochrome c release (Su et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2012). Mitochondrial-related genes were also found to be differentially expressed in AD-like O. degus brains, including the Cytochrome C Oxidase Subunit 8A (COX8A) that has been associated with the reduction of neuronal energy metabolism and mitochondrial dysfunction observed in AD patients by the inhibition of COX activity as a result of binding to Aβ-subunits (Lustbader et al., 2004; Liang et al., 2008).

The comparison of human and O. degus AD-like brain transcriptomes, revealed seven common genes that were deregulated. This included fibroblast growth factor 9 (FGF9), WISP1 and Copine VII (CPNE7). Interestingly, the FGF9 gene is known to be related to the MAPK pathway affected in AD patients (Antonell et al., 2013), and is one of the therapeutic targets currently used in AD treatment (Zhang et al., 2014).

Retinal abnormalities have also been reported to be associated to AD (Berisha et al., 2007). O. degus naturally develops cataracts, an eye dysfunction linked to neurodegeneration (Inestrosa et al., 2005, 2015; Braidy et al., 2015; Szabadfi et al., 2015). Our study revealed deregulated expression of two genes: FRMD7 and ADAMTS9, which were previously associated to retinal abnormalities. The FRMD7 gene plays role in retinal and neurite development, as well as in the neuronal outgrowth. It was also connected to X-linked infantile nystagmus, a disease characterized by abnormal eye function (Betts-Henderson et al., 2010). The ADAMTS9 gene is also known to be involved in abnormal eye development. Extracellular matrix is a key mediator in the pathogenesis of age related macular degeneration and includes ADAMTS9. ADAMTS9 activates AKT promoting photoreceptor degeneration and consequently membrane thickening and damage of retinal pigmentary cells. Moreover regulation of mTOR by ADAMTS9 leads to angiogenesis via VEGF A and TSP-1 this way regulating angiogenesis in the eye (Wight, 2005; Parry et al., 2009). Moreover, the activity disorders of ADAMTS9 regulation of the AKT/mTOR pathway leads to glycolysis and glucose uptake by increasing hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α (HIF1A) also been linked to AD (Avramovich-Tirosh et al., 2010). In humans, an ADAMTS9 gene variant is associated with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is most frequently linked with aging, cognitive impairment, AD-associated neuronal APP-Aβ deposits (de la Monte and Wands, 2005). In relation to these results, the O. degus has insulin resistance and naturally develops type 2 diabetes and associated cataracts when fed with a diet high in glucose (Datiles and Fukui, 1989).

We have also identified APOC-I (apolipoprotein C-I) to be deregulated in AD-like O. degus brain samples. Notably, APOC-I is part of the APOE/C-I/C-IV/C-II gene cluster on the chromosome 19 (Smit et al., 1988) and APOE modulates its expression. This gene encodes a small apolipoprotein that is associated with Aβ plaques (Kamino et al., 1996). APOC-I plays a critical role in CNS homeostasis, since altered expression impairs memory (Abildayeva et al., 2008). Moreover, is to be highlighted that APOC-I co-localizes with Aβ plaques in the brain in AD (Abildayeva et al., 2008).

The pathogenic mechanism resulting in the onset and progression of neurodegenerative diseases like AD is often associated with genetic variants and mutations and interactions with environmental impacts, lifestyle risk factors, and slowly evolving molecular changes due to aging (Jicha and Carr, 2010; Duchen, 2012). Thus, a number of AD research avenues could be investigated in this model other than RNA analysis. For example post-translationally through modification of protein residues like phosphorylation.

In this study we focused in whole brain, so studies of additional brain regions are needed and may point to different genes and additional pathways. The RNA-seq uncovered multiple DE transcripts, several of these are novel and some have been previously implicated in AD like WISP1 and APOC1. Being the present work a pilot study we have probably uncovered only a fraction of what these data may reveal about this model and its link with AD supporting further work with this species. Future work is underway in our laboratory to elucidate the characterization of global gene expression of young and old O. degus by analysing tissue from different brain areas. To our knowledge this is the first O. degus brain transcriptome study. Salazar et al. (2016), compare the sequences of genes in relation to AD using published data from O. degus, human and other rodents. They analyzed tau, APP, Apolipoprotein E (APOE), Presenilin 1 (Psen1), and Aβ-peptide sequences in correlation with specific human variants associated with AD. Their findings revealed that O. degus have the arginine substitution present in the ApoE4 pathogenic human allele; Psen1 gene showed a greater relatedness between the isoforms of human, degus, guinea pig, and mole rat, compared to those of others rodents such the rat, and also described that O. degus Aβ-peptide sequence presents high homology with the human protein, differing in only one amino acid (Salazar et al., 2016). Furthermore, Deacon et al. (2015) shows that AD-like O. degus have high levels of Aβ-peptide aggregates, APP, TNF-a, IL-6, IFN-a, and the oxidative stress marker NFE2L2 when compared to healthy control O. degus, suggesting that AD-like O. degus present increased inflammation as is observed in human AD patients (Deacon et al., 2015). Overall the study of others and the present explorative transcriptome analysis revealed that the AD-like O. degus shares common affected genes with those have been implicated in human AD and therefore provides further characterization of the O. degus as a relevant natural model. O. degus shows a correlation of expression with human AD-related genes making this model a powerful preclinical tool to characterize target effects of novel therapeutics in AD. This study provides strong evidence to support the O. degus as a valuable natural model for preclinical work in AD research.

Ethics statement

This study was carried out under the approval of the ethics committee of the Faculty of Sciences, Universidad de Chile, directed by Dr. Marco Méndez and integrated by:-Dr. Eduardo Friedman-Dr. Victoria Guixé-Dr. Madeleine Lamborot-Dr. Roberto Morales-Dr. Aurelio San Martín-Dr. Cecilia Vergara.

Data availability

All the Octodon degus transcriptome data is available through the NCBI using accession PRJNA326273.

Author contributions

FA and BU contributed to the experimental procedures, data analysis and the manuscript preparation. FC, AV, EP, SN, and DL contributed to created the bioinformatic pipeline for sequencing data analysis. LF contributed to the experimental procedures and data analysis. RMJD, MH, and RD contributed to comprehensive analysis of the results and to the manuscript preparation. RV, RG, and PC contributed to the funding of the project, the experimental design and the manuscript preparation.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by GeN.DDI Ltd (London, UK) and by the Chilean National Commission for Scientific and Technological Research Grants 1090794, 1140548, ICM-P05-002 and PFB-23-CONICYT (to the Institute of Ecology and Biodiversity). Research was conducted under permit No. 5193 issued by the Servicio Agrícola y Ganadero, Chile, with the supervision of the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Sciences, Universidad de Chile. We acknowledge support of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, “Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa 2013–2017,” SEV-2012-0208 and Project PT13/0001/0021 (ISCIII - Subdirección General de Evaluación y Fomento de la Investigación/FEDER “Una Manera de hacer Europa”).

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00064/full#supplementary-material

Click here for additional data file. (285.5KB, doc)
Click here for additional data file. (564.5KB, xls)

References

  1. Abildayeva K., Berbée J. F. P., Blokland A., Jansen P. J., Hoek F. J., Meijer O., et al. (2008). Human apolipoprotein C-I expression in mice impairs learning and memory functions. J. Lipid Res. 49, 856–869. 10.1194/jlr.M700518-JLR200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alleyne T., Mohan N., Joseph J., Adogwa A. (2011). Unraveling the role of metal ions and low catalytic activity of cytochrome C oxidase in Alzheimer's disease. J. Mol. Neurosci. 43, 284–289. 10.1007/s12031-010-9436-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Altschul S. (1997). Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3389–3402. 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Antonell A., Lladó A., Altirriba J., Botta-Orfila T., Balasa M., Fernández M., et al. (2013). A preliminary study of the whole-genome expression profile of sporadic and monogenic early-onset Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol. Aging 34, 1772–1778. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.12.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ardiles A. O., Tapia-Rojas C. C., Mandal M., Alexandre F., Kirkwood A., Inestrosa N. C., et al. (2012). Postsynaptic dysfunction is associated with spatial and object recognition memory loss in a natural model of Alzheimer's disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 13835–13840. 10.1073/pnas.1201209109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Avramovich-Tirosh Y., Bar-Am O., Amit T., Youdim M. B. H., Weinreb O. (2010). Up-regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α and HIF-target genes in cortical neurons by the novel multifunctional iron chelator anti-Alzheimer drug, M30. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 7, 300–306. 10.2174/156720510791162403 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bai B., Hales C. M., Chen P.-C., Gozal Y., Dammer E. B., Fritz J. J., et al. (2013). U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein complex and RNA splicing alterations in Alzheimer's disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 16562–16567. 10.1073/pnas.1310249110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Berisha F., Feke G. T., Trempe C. L., McMeel J. W., Schepens C. L. (2007). Retinal abnormalities in early alzheimer's disease. investig opthalmology Vis. Sci. 48, 2285 10.1167/iovs.06-1029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Betts-Henderson J., Bartesaghi S., Crosier M., Lindsay S., Chen H.-L., Salomoni P., et al. (2010). The nystagmus-associated FRMD7 gene regulates neuronal outgrowth and development. Hum. Mol. Genet. 19, 342–351. 10.1093/hmg/ddp500 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Birch A. M., Katsouri L., Sastre M. (2014). Modulation of inflammation in transgenic models of Alzheimer's disease. J. Neuroinflam. 11:25. 10.1186/1742-2094-11-25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Blalock E. M., Buechel H. M., Popovic J., Geddes J. W., Landfield P. W. (2011). Microarray analyses of laser-captured hippocampus reveal distinct gray and white matter signatures associated with incipient Alzheimer's disease. J. Chem. Neuroanat. 42, 118–126. 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2011.06.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Blalock E. M., Geddes J. W., Chen K. C., Porter N. M., Markesbery W. R., Landfield P. W. (2004). Incipient Alzheimer's disease: microarray correlation analyses reveal major transcriptional and tumor suppressor responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 2173–2178. 10.1073/pnas.0308512100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Blasko I., Stampfer-Kountchev M., Robatscher P., Veerhuis R., Eikelenboom P., Grubeck-Loebenstein B. (2004). How chronic inflammation can affect the brain and support the development of Alzheimer's disease in old age: the role of microglia and astrocytes. Aging Cell. 3, 169–176. 10.1111/j.1474-9728.2004.00101.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Braidy N., Muñoz P., Palacios A. G., Castellano-Gonzalez G., Inestrosa N. C., Chung R. S., et al. (2012). Recent rodent models for Alzheimer's disease: clinical implications and basic research. J. Neural Transm. 119, 173–195. 10.1007/s00702-011-0731-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Braidy N., Poljak A., Jayasena T., Mansour H., Inestrosa N. C., Sachdev P. S. (2015). Accelerating Alzheimer's research through “natural”animal models. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 28, 155–164. 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Castellani R. J., Perry G. (2012). Pathogenesis and disease-modifying therapy in Alzheimer's disease: the flat line of progress. Arch. Med. Res. 43, 694–698. 10.1016/j.arcmed.2012.09.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Correa L. A., León C., Ramírez-Estrada J., Soto-Gamboa M., Sepúlveda R. D., Ebensperger L. A. (2016). Masculinized females produce heavier offspring in a group living rodent. J. Anim. Ecol. 85, 1552–1562. 10.1111/1365-2656.12588 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Datiles M. B., III, Fukui H. (1989). Cataract prevention in diabetic Octodon degus with Pfizer's sorbinil. Curr. Eye Res. 8, 233–237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Deacon R. M. J. (2014). A novel approach to discovering treatments for alzheimer's disease. J. Alzheimer Dis. Park. 4:142 10.4172/2161-0460.1000142 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Deacon R. M. J. (2006). Burrowing in rodents: a sensitive method for detecting behavioral dysfunction. Nat. Protoc. 1, 118–121. 10.1038/nprot.2006.19 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Deacon R. M. J., Altimiras F. J., Bazan-Leon E. A., Pyarasani R. D., Nachtigall F. M., Santos L. S., et al. (2015). Natural AD-Like neuropathology in Octodon degus: impaired burrowing and neuroinflammation. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 12, 314–322. 10.2174/1567205012666150324181652 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. de la Monte S. M., Wands J. R. (2005). Review of insulin and insulin-like growth factor expression, signaling, and malfunction in the central nervous system: relevance to Alzheimer's disease. J. Alzheimer's Dis. 7, 45–61. Available online at: http://content.iospress.com/articles/journal-of-alzheimers-disease/jad00401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Dobin A., Davis C. A., Schlesinger F., Drenkow J., Zaleski C., Jha S., et al. (2013). STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Duchen M. R. (2012). Mitochondria, calcium-dependent neuronal death and neurodegenerative disease. Pflügers Arch. 464. 111–121. 10.1007/s00424-012-1112-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ebensperger L., Hurtado M. J. (2005). Seasonal changes in the time budget of degus, Octodon degus. Behaviour 142, 91–112. 10.1163/1568539053627703 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Fiori L. M., Turecki G. (2008). Implication of the polyamine system in mental disorders. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 33, 102–110. Available online at: http://jpn.ca/vol33-issue2/33-2-102/ [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Götz S., García-Gómez J. M., Terol J., Williams T. D., Nagaraj S. H., Nueda M. J., et al. (2008). High-throughput functional annotation and data mining with the Blast2GO suite. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 3420–3435. 10.1093/nar/gkn176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Guigo R., Dermitzakis E. T., Agarwal P., Ponting C. P., Parra G., Reymond A., et al. (2003). Comparison of mouse and human genomes followed by experimental verification yields an estimated 1,019 additional genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 1140–1145. 10.1073/pnas.0337561100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Guigó R., Knudsen S., Drake N., Smith T. (1992). Prediction of gene structure. J. Mol. Biol. 226, 141–157. 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90130-C [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Haas B. J. (2003). Improving the Arabidopsis genome annotation using maximal transcript alignment assemblies. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 5654–5666. 10.1093/nar/gkg770 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Haas B. J., Salzberg S. L., Zhu W., Pertea M., Allen J. E., Orvis J., et al. (2008). Automated eukaryotic gene structure annotation using Evidencemodeler and the program to assemble spliced alignments. Genome Biol. 9:R7. 10.1186/gb-2008-9-1-r7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Harrow J., Frankish A., Gonzalez J. M., Tapanari E., Diekhans M., Kokocinski F., et al. (2012). GENCODE: the reference human genome annotation for The ENCODE Project. Genome Res. 22, 1760–1774. 10.1101/gr.135350.111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Inestrosa N. C., Reyes A. E., Chacón M. A., Cerpa W., Villalón A., Montiel J., et al. (2005). Human-like rodent amyloid-beta-peptide determines Alzheimer pathology in aged wild-type Octodon degu. Neurobiol. Aging 26, 1023–1028. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2004.09.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Inestrosa N. C., Ríos J. A., Cisternas P., Tapia-Rojas C., Rivera D. S., Braidy N., et al. (2015). Age progression of neuropathological markers in the brain of the chilean rodent Octodon degus, a natural model of Alzheimer's disease. Brain Pathol. 25, 679–691. 10.1111/bpa.12226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Iwata H., Gotoh O. (2012). Benchmarking spliced alignment programs including Spaln2, an extended version of Spaln that incorporates additional species-specific features. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, e161. 10.1093/nar/gks708 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Jicha G. A., Carr S. A. (2010). Conceptual evolution in Alzheimer's disease: implications for understanding the clinical phenotype of progressive neurodegenerative disease. J. Alzheimer's Dis. 19, 253–272. 10.3233/JAD-2010-1237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kamino K., Yoshiiwa A., Nishiwaki Y., Nagano K., Yamamoto H., Kobayashi T., et al. (1996). Genetic association study between senile dementia of Alzheimer's Type and APOE/C1/C2 gene cluster. Gerontology 42(Suppl. 1), 12–19. 10.1159/000213820 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kanehisa M., Goto S., Sato Y., Furumichi M., Tanabe M. (2012). KEGG for integration and interpretation of large-scale molecular data sets. Nucleic Acids Res. 40(Database issue), D109–D114. 10.1093/nar/gkr988 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kanehisa M., Goto S., Sato Y., Kawashima M., Furumichi M., Tanabe M. (2014). Data, information, knowledge and principle: back to metabolism in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res. 42(Database issue), D199–D205. 10.1093/nar/gkt1076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Laurijssens B., Aujard F., Rahman A. (2013). Animal models of Alzheimer's disease and drug development. Drug Discov. Today Technol. 10, e319–e327. 10.1016/j.ddtec.2012.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Li B., Dewey C. N. (2011). RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics 12:323. 10.1186/1471-2105-12-323 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Li H., Handsaker B., Wysoker A., Fennell T., Ruan J., Homer N., et al. (2009). The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 25, 2078–2079. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Liang W. S., Reiman E. M., Valla J., Dunckley T., Beach T. G., Grover A., et al. (2008). Alzheimer's disease is associated with reduced expression of energy metabolism genes in posterior cingulate neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 4441–4446. 10.1073/pnas.0709259105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lombardo S., Maskos U. (2015). Role of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in Alzheimer's disease pathology and treatment. Neuropharmacology 96, 255–262. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2014.11.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lustbader J. W., Cirilli M., Lin C., Xu H. W., Takuma K., Wang N., et al. (2004). ABAD directly links Abeta to mitochondrial toxicity in Alzheimer's disease. Science 304, 448–452. 10.1126/science.1091230 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Mangialasche F., Solomon A., Winblad B., Mecocci P., Kivipelto M. (2010). Alzheimer's disease: clinical trials and drug development. Lancet Neurol. 9, 702–716. 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70119-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Moriya Y., Itoh M., Okuda S., Yoshizawa A. C., Kanehisa M. (2007). KAAS: an automatic genome annotation and pathway reconstruction server. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W182–W185. 10.1093/nar/gkm321 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Morrison L. D., Bergeron C., Kish S. J. (1993). Brain S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase activity is increased in Alzheimer's disease. Neurosci Lett. 154, 141–144. 10.1016/0304-3940(93)90191-M [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Mortazavi A., Williams B. A., McCue K., Schaeffer L., Wold B. (2008). Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat Methods 5, 621–628. 10.1038/nmeth.1226 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Nazem A., Sankowski R., Bacher M., Al-Abed Y. (2015). Rodent models of neuroinflammation for Alzheimer's disease. J. Neuroinflam. 12, 74. 10.1186/s12974-015-0291-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Parra G., Agarwal P., Abril J. F., Wiehe T., Fickett J. W., Guigó R. (2003). Comparative gene prediction in human and mouse. Genome Res. 13, 108–117. 10.1101/gr.871403 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Parry D. A., Toomes C., Bida L., Danciger M., Towns K. V., McKibbin M., et al. (2009). Loss of the metalloprotease ADAM9 leads to cone-rod dystrophy in humans and retinal degeneration in mice. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 84, 683–691. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.04.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Readnower R. D., Sauerbeck A. D., Sullivan P. G. (2011). Mitochondria, Amyloid β, and Alzheimer's disease. Int. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2011, 1–5. 10.4061/2011/104545 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Robinson M. D., McCarthy D. J., Smyth G. K. (2010). edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 26, 139–140. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Rumble S. M., Lacroute P., Dalca A. V., Fiume M., Sidow A., Brudno M. (2009). SHRiMP: accurate mapping of short color-space reads. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5:e1000386. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000386 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Salazar C., Valdivia G., Ardiles Á. O., Ewer J., Palacios A. G. (2016). Genetic variants associated with neurodegenerative Alzheimer disease in natural models. Biol. Res. 49, 14. 10.1186/s40659-016-0072-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Saraceno C., Musardo S., Marcello E., Pelucchi S., Luca M. D. (2013). Modeling Alzheimer's disease: from past to future. Front. Pharmacol. 4:77. 10.3389/fphar.2013.00077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Slater G. S. C., Birney E. (2005). Automated generation of heuristics for biological sequence comparison. BMC Bioinformatics. 6:31. 10.1186/1471-2105-6-31 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Smit M., van der Kooij-Meijs E., Frants R. R., Havekes L., Klasen E. C. (1988). Apolipoprotein gene cluster on chromosome 19. Hum. Genet. 78, 90–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Stanke M., Keller O., Gunduz I., Hayes A., Waack S., Morgenstern B. (2006a). AUGUSTUS: ab initio prediction of alternative transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res. 34(Web Server issue), W435–W439. 10.1093/nar/gkl200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Stanke M., Schöffmann O., Morgenstern B., Waack S. (2006b). Gene prediction in eukaryotes with a generalized hidden Markov model that uses hints from external sources. BMC Bioinformatics 7:62. 10.1186/1471-2105-7-62 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Su Y. A., Wu J., Zhang L., Zhang Q., Su D. M., He P., et al. (2008). Dysregulated mitochondrial genes and networks with drug targets in postmortem brain of patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) revealed by human mitochondria-focused cDNA microarrays. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 4, 223–235. 10.7150/ijbs.4.223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Szabadfi K., Estrada C., Fernandez-Villalba E., Tarragon E., Setalo G., Izura V., et al. (2015). Retinal aging in the diurnal Chilean rodent (Octodon degus): histological, ultrastructural and neurochemical alterations of the vertical information processing pathway. Front. Cell Neurosci. 9:126. 10.3389/fncel.2015.00126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Tarragon E., Lopez D., Estrada C., Ana G.-C., Schenker E., Pifferi F., et al. (2013). Octodon degus: a model for the cognitive impairment associated with Alzheimaer's disease. CNS Neurosci Ther. 19, 643–648. 10.1111/cns.12125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Varela-Nallar L., Inestrosa N. C. (2013). Wnt signaling in the regulation of adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Front. Cell Neurosci. 7:100. 10.3389/fncel.2013.00100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Wang S., Chong Z. Z., Shang Y. C., Maiese K. (2012). Wnt1 inducible signaling pathway protein 1 (WISP1) blocks neurodegeneration through phosphoinositide 3 kinase/Akt1 and apoptotic mitochondrial signaling involving Bad, Bax, Bim, and Bcl-xL. Curr. Neurovasc. Res. 9, 20–31. 10.2174/156720212799297137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Wight T. N. (2005). The ADAMTS proteases, extracellular matrix, and vascular disease: waking the sleeping giant(s)! Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 25, 12–14. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000150043.43083.aa [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Windisch M. (2014). We can treat Alzheimer's disease successfully in mice but not in men: failure in translation? A perspective. Neurodegener Dis. 13, 147–150. 10.1159/000357568 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Zdobnov E. M., Apweiler R. (2001). InterProScan–an integration platform for the signature-recognition methods in InterPro. Bioinformatics 17, 847–848. 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.9.847 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Zhang C., Chen J., Feng C., Shao X., Liu Q., Zhang Q., et al. (2014). Intranasal nanoparticles of basic fibroblast growth factor for brain delivery to treat Alzheimer's disease. Int. J. Pharm. 461, 192–202. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.11.049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Click here for additional data file. (285.5KB, doc)
Click here for additional data file. (564.5KB, xls)

Data Availability Statement

All the Octodon degus transcriptome data is available through the NCBI using accession PRJNA326273.

Articles from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES