Abstract
Power consumption in irreversible QCA logic circuits is a vital and a major issue; however in the practical cases, this focus is mostly omitted.The complete power depletion dataset of different QCA multiplexers have been worked out in this paper. At −271.15 °C temperature, the depletion is evaluated under three separate tunneling energy levels. All the circuits are designed with QCADesigner, a broadly used simulation engine and QCAPro tool has been applied for estimating the power dissipation.
Keywords: Quantum-dot cellular automata, Multiplexer, Power dissipation, QCAPro
Specifications Table
| Subject area | Electronics |
| More specific subject area | Nano-electronics |
| Type of data | Table, figure |
| How data was acquired | QCADesigner and Hamming distance process have been applied to attain the data set |
| Data format | Analyzed |
| Data accessibility | Data is within this article |
Value of the data
-
•
Computer memories, communication systems and other circuit structures can be utilized for computational analysis using this study in terms of power consumption.
-
•
The presented data analysis can support the researchers to examine the energy analysis of complex network systems.
-
•
It can be utilized to estimate polarization error and non adiabatic switching power loss in QCA reversible designs.
1. Data
In this paper, power dissipation analysis of different multiplexer circuits presented in [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], have been investigated in Table 1 at three different tunneling energy levels like and The energy dissipation map which includes leakage power dissipation, switching power dissipation and average power dissipation of various QCA multiplexers have been shown in Fig. 1.
Table 1.
Energy dissipation analysis of multiplexers at three different tunneling energy levels.
| Circuit | Leakage energy dissipation (meV) |
Switching energy dissipation (meV) |
Total energy dissipation (meV) |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 Ek | 1.0 Ek | 1.5 Ek | 0.5 Ek | 1.0 Ek | 1.5 Ek | 0.5 Ek | 1.0 Ek | 1.5 Ek | |
| Multiplexer[1] | 12.4 | 39.16 | 71.13 | 66.98 | 58.57 | 50.28 | 79.38 | 97.73 | 121.41 |
| Multiplexer [2] | 19.35 | 60.43 | 108.67 | 97.45 | 83.57 | 70.55 | 116.8 | 144 | 179.22 |
| Multiplexer [3] | 20.38 | 64.9 | 118.49 | 122.17 | 107.15 | 92.02 | 142.55 | 172.05 | 210.51 |
| Multiplexer[4] | 8.53 | 27.57 | 50.43 | 41.63 | 36.39 | 31.22 | 50.16 | 63.96 | 81.65 |
| Multiplexer [5] | 7.16 | 20.53 | 35.68 | 25.43 | 21.7 | 18.29 | 32.59 | 42.23 | 53.97 |
| Multiplexer [6] | 6.72 | 21.58 | 39.4 | 26.25 | 22.93 | 19.64 | 32.97 | 44.51 | 59.04 |
| Multiplexer [7] | 6.79 | 21.16 | 38.27 | 35.22 | 30.37 | 25.85 | 42.01 | 51.53 | 64.12 |
| Multiplexer [8] | 10.69 | 31.68 | 55.42 | 38.06 | 31.87 | 26.49 | 48.75 | 63.55 | 81.91 |
| Multiplexer [9] | 4.54 | 13.88 | 24.63 | 11.41 | 9.77 | 8.19 | 15.95 | 23.65 | 32.82 |
| Multiplexer [10] | 5.5 | 17.38 | 31.17 | 26.83 | 22.66 | 18.91 | 32.33 | 40.04 | 50.08 |
Fig. 1.
The power dissipation maps of multiplexer in (a) Ref. [1] (b) Ref. [2] (c) Ref. [3] (d) Ref. [4] (e) Ref. [5] (f) Ref. [6] (g) Ref. [7] (h) Ref. [8] (i) Ref. [9] and (j) Ref. [10] at 2 K temperature with 0.5 Ek tunneling energy level.
2. Experimental design, materials and methods
2.1. Analysis of power dissipation
For estimating the power dissipation of reported multiplexers [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10] QCAPro; a power analyzing tools for QCA design has been applied. This tool estimate polarization error and non-adiabatic switching power loss in Quantum-dot Cellular Automata (QCA) circuits. It uses a fast approximation based technique to estimate highly erroneous cells in QCA circuit design. In our study, power estimation of all the multiplexers has been achieved at a stable temperature T= −271.15 °C. The power dissipation by a QCA cell is calculated using the Hartree–Fock mean-field approach approximation which is illustrated as [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]
| (1) |
According to the upper bound power dissipation model [14] the power dissipation by a QCA cell is given as
| (2) |
Footnotes
Transparency data associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.dib.2017.03.001.
Transparency document. Supplementary material
Supplementary material
.
References
- 1.Kim K., Wu K., Karri R. The robust QCA adder designs using composable QCA building blocks. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Des. Integr. Circ. Syst. 2007;26:176–183. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mardiris V.A., Karafyllidis I.G. Design and simulation of modular 2n to 1 quantum-dot cellular automata (QCA) multiplexers. Int. J. Circ. Theor. Appl. 2010;38:771–785. [Google Scholar]
- 3.T. Teodosio, L. Sousa, QCA-LG: A tool for the automatic layout generation of QCA combinational circuits, in: Proceedings of the Norchip 2007, 2007 pp. 1–5. 〈doi:10.1109/NORCHP.2007.4481078〉
- 4.M.A. Amiri, M. Mahdavi, S. Mirzakuchaki, QCA implementation of a MUX-Based FPGA CLB, in: Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Nanoscience and Nanotechnologypp, 2008, pp. 141–144. 〈doi:10.1109/ICONN.2008.4639266〉
- 5.Mukhopadhyay D., Dutta P. Quantum cellular automata based novel Unit 2:1 multiplexer. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 2012;43:22–25. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Roohi A., Khademolhosseini H., Sayedsalehi S., Navi K., Novel A. Architecture for quantum-dot cellular automata multiplexer. Int. J. Comput. Sci. 2011;8:55–60. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sabbaghi-Nadooshan R., Kianpour M. A novel QCA implementation of MUX-based universal shift register. J. Comput. Electron. 2014;13:198–210. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Askari M., Taghizadeh M. Logic circuit design in nano-scale using quantum-dot cellular automata. Eur. J. Sci. Res. 2011;48:516–526. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Das J.C., De D.D. Optimized multiplexer design and simulation using quantum dot-cellular automata. Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys. (IJPAP) 2016;54:802–811. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Das J.C., De D. Shannon׳s expansion theorem-based multiplexer synthesis using QCA. Nanomater. Energy. 2016;5:53–60. [Google Scholar]
- 11.S. Srivastava, A. Asthana, S. Bhanja, S. Sarkar, QCAPro - An error-power estimation tool for QCA circuit design, in: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Symposium of Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), pp. 2377–2380. 〈doi:10.1109/ISCAS.2011.5938081〉, 2011.
- 12.Timler J., Lent C.S. Power gain and dissipation in quantum-dot cellular automata. J. Appl. Phys. 2002;91:823–831. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bahar A.N., Waheed S., Hossain N., Asaduzzaman M. A novel 3-input XOR function implementation in quantum-dot cellular automata with energy dissipation analysis. Alex. Eng. J. 2017 [Google Scholar]
- 14.Srivastava S., Sarkar S., Bhanja S. Estimation of upper bound of power dissipation in QCA circuits. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 2009;8:116–127. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bahar A.N., Rahman M.M., Nahid N.M., Hassan M.K. Energy dissipation dataset for reversible logic gates in quantum dot-cellular automata. Data Brief. 2017;10:557–560. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.12.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary material

