The past decades have seen a gradual increase in attention toward women's heart and brain health. In the United States, this attention usually culminates in February, when the efforts of the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, and other prominent organizations coincide around the reality that women are commonly afflicted by cardiovascular disease and stroke – and that our prevention programs, clinical care, and research need to include consideration of this population.
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes contributes to both the awareness of women's cardiovascular health and to progress in promoting it. The journal's efforts in this respect are ongoing, highlighted by the annual Go Red For Women issue that is now in its second year. The work contained in this issue draws special attention to contributions that address women and the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of cardiovascular disease.
We feel privileged to present an abundance of rigorous work generated by outstanding women scientists. Their contributions include thoughtful perspectives that are personal, clinical, and scientific.1-3 We present a message from the Chief Executive Officer of the American Heart Association4 and a contribution from the President-Elect of the American College and Cardiology.2 The issue includes articles by authors from various countries, by a leading policy expert and government official, by leading women's health researchers, and by junior investigators who are the future of our field.
The manuscripts submitted for this special issue have increased each year in quantity and breadth of topics. Those selected this year range from a focus on how lifestyle factors can predict heart disease far into the future,5 to return to work after acute myocardial infarction for young women,6 to sex differences in the diagnosis and incidence of peripheral artery disease,7,8 to the long-term implications of hypertensive pregnancy disorders,9 to the role of sex in prediction models,10 to the role of sex and age in percutaneous coronary intervention,11 and to the relationship of parity to metabolic syndrome.12 Some of the investigations are comparisons by sex and others, such as those focusing on pregnancy, address issues that are particular to women.
With this issue and those similar to come, we strive to create a future in which a special issue on women's cardiovascular health is obsolete. We will know that we have arrived when an abundance of research on the topic of women's health that generates knowledge to improve the care and outcomes of a formerly neglected population is commonplace. We will know that we have achieved equity of opportunity within medicine when there is no longer a need to note the gender (or the race/ethnicity) of authors, investigators, and leaders, especially among the upper tiers of science and clinical care. The knowledge that this new environment will foster will capture the heterogeneity of biology, experience, preference, and values among women and men. Within this framework, we will become ever more precise in our understanding, prevention, and treatment of disease, and the personalization of our approach.
Acknowledgments
Funding Source: Dr. Krumholz is supported by grant U01 HL105270-05 (Center for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research at Yale University) from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
Footnotes
Disclosures: Dr. Krumholz is the recipient of research agreements from Medtronic and from Johnson & Johnson (Janssen), through Yale University, to develop methods of clinical trial data sharing and chairs a cardiac scientific advisory board for United Healthcare.
References
- 1.Rossi AM, Pilote L. Let's talk about sex… and gender! Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016;9:S100–S101. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.002660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Walsh MN, Joynt KE. Delays in seeking care: a women's problem? Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016;9:S97–S99. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.002668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.McNeely C, Vassileva C. Mitral valve surgery in women: another target for eradicating sex inequality. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016;9:S94–S96. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Brown N. Helping women change the odds against their number 1 health threat. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016;9:S3–S4. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.002669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sotos-Prieto M, Mattei J, Hu FB, Chomistek AK, Rimm EB, Willett WC, Eliassen AH, Chiuve SE. Association between a healthy heart score and the development of clinical cardiovascular risk factors among women: a potential role for primordial prevention. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016;9:S77–S85. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dreyer RP, Xu X, Zhang W, Du X, Strait KM, Bierlein M, Bucholz EM, Geda M, Fox J, D'Onofrio G, Lichtman JH, Bueno H, Spertus JA, Krumholz HM. Return to work after acute myocardial infarction: a comparison between young women and men. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016;9:S45–S52. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.McDermott MM. Sex differences in the ankle brachial index measurement and interpreting findings of sex differences in peripheral artery disease burden. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016;9:S5–S7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wang GJ, Shaw PA, Townsend RR, Anderson AH, Xie D, Wang X, Nessel LC, Mohler ER, Sozio SM, Jaar BG, Chen J, Wright J, Taliercio JJ, Ojo A, Ricardo AC, Lustigova E, Fairman RM, Feldman HI, Ky B for the CRIC Investigators. Sex differences in the incidence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) in the chronic renal insufficiency cohort (CRIC) Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016;9:S86–S93. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mielke MM, Milic NM, Weissgerber TL, White WM, Kantarci K, Mosley TH, Windham BG, Simpson BN, Turner ST, Garovic VD. Impaired cognition and brain atrophy decades after hypertensive pregnancy disorders. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016;9:S70–S76. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Paulus JK, Wessler BS, Lundquist C, Lai LLY, Raman G, Lutz JS, Kent DM. A Field synopsis of sex in clinical prediction models for cardiovascular disease. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016;9:S8–S15. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Epps KC, Holper EM, Selzer HA, Vlachos HA, Gualano SK, Abbot JD, Jacobs AK, Marroquin OC, Naidu SS, Groeneveld PW, Wilensky RL. Sex differences in outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention according to age. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016;9:S16–S25. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Vladutiu CJ, Siega-Riz AM, Sotres-Alvarez AM, Stuebe AM, Ni A, Tabb KM, Gallo LC, Potter JE, Heiss G. Parity and components of the metabolic syndrome among US Hispanic/Latina women: results from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016;9:S62–S69. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]