Abstract
A 54-year-old man presented with change in behaviour, nocturnal enuresis, abnormal limb movement and headache of one week’s duration. The diagnosis of butterfly glioma (glioblastoma multiforme) was made based on imaging characteristics and was further confirmed by biopsy findings. As the corpus callosum is usually resistant to infiltration by tumours, a mass that involves and crosses the corpus callosum is suggestive of an aggressive neoplasm. Other neoplastic and non-neoplastic conditions that may involve the corpus callosum and mimic a butterfly glioma, as well as associated imaging features, are discussed.
Keywords: butterfly glioma, butterfly tumours, corpus callosum, glioblastoma multiforme
CASE PRESENTATION
A 54-year-old man presented with change in behaviour, nocturnal enuresis, abnormal limb movement and headache of one week’s duration. His neurological examination was unremarkable. What do computed tomography (CT) (Fig. 1) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (Figs. 2a–c) of the brain show? What is the diagnosis?
IMAGE INTERPRETATION
Unenhanced CT of the brain (Fig. 1) shows a heterogeneous lesion involving both frontal lobes, which crosses the midline at the genu of the corpus callosum. The lesion is associated with perilesional oedema and is causing a mass effect on the lateral ventricles anteriorly. MR imaging shows that the lesion has heterogeneous signal intensity with surrounding oedema and mass effect, best demonstrated in the T2-weighted sequence (Fig. 2a). The gradient-echo image (Fig. 2b) shows multifocal areas of intralesional susceptibility indicative of internal haemorrhages. The contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR image (Fig. 2c) shows heterogeneous and predominantly peripheral enhancement of the lesion, with central non-enhancing areas indicative of intralesional necrosis. The lesion has a ‘butterfly’ configuration that is well depicted, especially on MR imaging.
DIAGNOSIS
Corpus callosum glioblastoma multiforme (GBM): butterfly glioma.
CLINICAL COURSE
Stereotactic biopsy of the tumour was performed; histopathology revealed pleomorphic atypical cells with hyperchromatic nuclei that were strongly positive for glial fibrillary acidic protein. The overall findings were consistent with glioblastoma multiforme. The tumour was considered inoperable due to associated postoperative morbidity, tumour histology, extensive size and the involvement of the corpus callosum. The patient was treated with dexamethasone to control the cerebral oedema and phenytoin to prevent seizure. He also underwent 12 fractions of palliative radiotherapy after being seen by a radiation and medical oncologist, and was then referred to hospice care for palliative management.
DISCUSSION
GBM is more commonly seen in patients older than 50 years of age.(1) Imaging of these tumours usually shows a heterogeneous pattern of enhancement, with significant perilesional oedema and mass effect. Intralesional haemorrhage and necrosis may occur. They are usually solitary tumours. Restricted diffusion may be seen on MR imaging due to the high cellularity of these lesions. They also tend to show increased relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) in perfusion imaging.(1,2)
Several neoplastic and non-neoplastic conditions may involve the corpus callosum and mimic a butterfly glioma. As the corpus callosum is usually resistant to infiltration by tumours, a mass that involves and crosses the corpus callosum is indicative of an aggressive neoplasm such as GBM.(2) Lymphomas (Figs. 3a & b) and brain metastases (Figs. 4a & b) are other tumours that can infiltrate the corpus callosum, causing a similar ‘butterfly’ appearance. Non-neoplastic lesions such as tumefactive demyelination and toxoplasmosis can also involve and cross the corpus callosum, mimicking a butterfly glioma.(2,3) A meningioma, when it arises from the falx cerebri and crosses the midline, is another possible mimic (Figs. 5a & b).(4)
Primary central nervous system lymphomas are usually of the B-cell non-Hodgkin type, which peak in incidence at the sixth decade of age.(1) Patients with congenital immunodeficiency and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, as well as organ transplant recipients, are at high risk of developing lymphoma. In contrast to GBM, lymphomas tend to show less perilesional oedema and are less frequently necrotic. About half of these patients exhibit multiple lesions.(1) Lymphomas may show a hyperdense CT appearance and are usually homogeneously isointense to hypointense in T1-weighted MR images, as well as hypointense in T2-weighted MR images. They tend not to calcify nor bleed. Mild contrast enhancement and restricted diffusion may be seen in such lesions. In immunocompromised patients, a lymphoma may demonstrate heterogeneous signal intensity and ring enhancement. They are highly radiosensitive and may reduce or even vanish in response to steroid administration.(1,2,5)
In multiple sclerosis (MS), multiple ovoid-shaped white matter plaques are seen perpendicular to the lateral ventricles. Tumefactive demyelination is a type of MS that mimics a neoplasm in imaging. When it involves the corpus callosum, it may cross the midline and mimic a butterfly glioma (demyelinating butterfly pseudo-glioma). The presence of the following imaging features favours the diagnosis of MS over high-grade glioma: (a) an open ring-like enhancement; (b) minimal perilesional oedema in a large lesion; (c) dilated vein within the lesion, (d) decreased rCBV in perfusion imaging, and (e) resolution of the lesion after steroid therapy.(6)
Toxoplasmosis can affect patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Lesions usually present as multiple hypodensities with ring-like or nodular enhancement on CT, and are commonly located at the basal ganglia and corticomedullary junction. The enhancing lesion can mimic a tumour; when it involves the corpus callosum, crossing the midline, it can produce a ‘butterfly’ appearance.(7)
Metastasis is one of the differentials for lesions involving the corpus callosum. When the metastasis crosses the midline, it can mimic a butterfly glioma.(7) The presence of multiple lesions and a known history of primary cancer are the key features in differentiating metastases from GBM. However, differentiating solitary metastases from GBM is challenging because of a similar imaging appearance on CT and conventional MR sequences. Tsougos et al described applications of advanced MR sequences such as MR spectroscopy and MR perfusion in differentiating these two lesions.(8) They described peritumoral ratio as the ratio of a particular parameter in the peritumoral area to that of the contralateral normal area. The authors concluded that elevated peritumoral ratio of rCBV in perfusion imaging, and elevated peritumoral ratios of N-acetylaspartate (NAA)/creatine (Cr), choline (Cho)/Cr, and Cho/NAA ratios in MR spectroscopy are useful imaging findings in differentiating GBM from metastases.
Meningiomas are extra-axial tumours often seen in middle-aged female patients. They appear mildly hyperdense on unenhanced CT and show prominent homogeneous enhancement after administration of intravenous contrast. A meningioma can mimic butterfly glioma when it arises from the falx cerebri and crosses the midline.(3) Presence of a cerebrospinal fluid intensity cleft between the tumour and adjacent brain cortex is a useful sign to identify the extra-axial location of these lesions and differentiate them from butterfly gliomas.(9)
In conclusion, GBM is the most common cause of callosal tumours with a ‘butterfly’ appearance. Other neoplastic causes include lymphoma, intracranial metastasis and falx meningioma. Non-neoplastic causes like tumefactive demyelination and toxoplasmosis can also mimic butterfly tumours of the corpus callosum. An adequate knowledge of imaging findings and prudent correlation with clinical findings will help in achieving early accurate diagnosis and appropriate patient management without unnecessary intervention.
REFERENCES
- 1.Jayaraman MV, Boxerman JL. Adult Brain Tumors. In: Atlas SW, editor. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain and Spine. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009. pp. 446–590. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bourekas EC, Varakis K, Bruns D, et al. Lesions of the corpus callosum: MR imaging and differential considerations in adults and children. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:251–7. doi: 10.2214/ajr.179.1.1790251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Agrawal A. Butterfly glioma of the corpus callosum. J Cancer Res Ther. 2009;5:43–5. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.48769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Buetow MP, Buetow PC, Smirniotopoulos JG. Typical, atypical, and misleading features in meningioma. Radiographics. 1991;11:1087–106. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.11.6.1749851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Krupa K, Bekiesinska-Figatowska M. Congenital and acquired abnormalities of the corpus callosum: a pictorial essay. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:265619. doi: 10.1155/2013/265619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kazi AZ, Joshi PC, Kelkar AB, Mahajan MS, Ghawate AS. MRI evaluation of pathologies affecting the corpus callosum: A pictorial essay. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2013;23:321–32. doi: 10.4103/0971-3026.125604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lee HJ, Williams R, Kalnin A, Wolansky L. Toxoplasmosis of the corpus callosum: another butterfly. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166:1280–1. doi: 10.2214/ajr.166.6.8633432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tsougos I, Svolos P, Kousi E, et al. Differentiation of glioblastoma multiforme from metastatic brain tumor using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy, diffusion and perfusion metrics at 3 T. Cancer Imaging. 2012;12:423–36. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2012.0038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Watts J, Box G, Galvin A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of meningiomas: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging. 2014;5:113–22. doi: 10.1007/s13244-013-0302-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.