Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2017 Mar 23;7:45198. doi: 10.1038/srep45198

Microstructure formation and interface characteristics of directionally solidified TiAl-Si alloys in alumina crucibles with a new Y2O3 skull-aided technology

Jianglei Fan 1,a, Jianxiu Liu 1,b, Shen Wu 1, Shuxia Tian 1, Hongxia Gao 1, Shengyong Wang 1, Jingjie Guo 2, Xiao Wang 3
PMCID: PMC5362902  PMID: 28332635

Abstract

The microstructure evolution and interface characteristics of a directionally solidified Ti-43Al-3Si (at.%) alloy in an alumina (Al2O3) crucible with new Y2O3 skull-aided technology were investigated. The Y2O3-skull that is in contact with the TiAl-melt is relatively stable, which results in a more controlled reaction between the skull and the melt than in the case of an Al2O3 crucible is used. A thin reaction layer was formed between the mould and the melt through mutual diffusion. The layer thickness increased with increasing reaction time. The thickness of this layer was less than 80 μm for reaction times up to 5800 s. Y2O3 particles were not found in the specimen because the mould coating was prepared with fine Y2O3 powder without a binder, which prevented the Y2O3 particles splitting from the coating as a consequence of thermal physical erosion. The oxygen content of the TiAl-alloy increased with increasing reaction time. The total oxygen content of the solidified specimen was less than that of the specimen solidified in the Al2O3 crucibles. This new Y2O3 skull-aided technology is expected to improve the surface quality of TiAl-alloys and reduce the reaction between the crucible/mould and molten TiAl alloys during directional solidification processing with longer contact times.

γ-TiAl-based alloys have numerous attractive properties: they are lightweight, resistant to oxidation and strong at high temperatures1,2,3,4,5. These properties meet the demands of next-generation aircraft and automotive engines. The main obstacles that limit commercial applications of TiAl alloys are their inherently brittle nature, low fluidity and high processing cost6. Nevertheless, the casting process provides a method with advantages for the manufacture of TiAl alloys when compared to forging and rolling7. Various techniques have been applied to investigate the solidification behaviours of TiAl alloys, such as the optical floating zone method8,9, Bridgman method10,11,12,13,14, water-cooled copper crucible method15,16,17,18,19, and electromagnetic confinement method20,21,22. Because of the well-known high reactivity of the melt, the selection of the mould material for casting of TiAl alloys is important.

Until now, a reaction between the metal and crucible was inevitable and led to metal contamination23,24,25,26. Hence, imparting the inner face of the mould with high chemical stability, mechanical stability, and thermal stability is a key factor for the precision casting of γ-TiAl alloys27,28. In the case of TiAl alloys, the materials commonly used for crucibles or moulds are oxide ceramics such as Y2O329,30, CaO31, Al2O332,33,34,35,36, ZrO237,38, CaZrO339, AlN40 or BN41. The reaction between the TiAl alloy melt and crucible can be controlled over a relatively short solidification time using these materials33,42. Nonetheless, with a longer contact time, the surface quality and microstructure of TiAl alloys are still difficult to effectively control. Some methods that do not include a container, such as optical and induction floating zone furnaces9,43,44,45 and the electromagnetic confinement method, are also used for fundamental directional solidification studies of TiAl alloys22,46. From the perspective of cost, using oxide ceramic crucible/mould remains the best choice for preparing castings of TiAl alloys by. Y2O3 is regarded as the best crucible material; however, Y2O3 is expensive and exhibits poor thermal shock resistance47. Although CaO is more inert than Al2O3, moisture accumulation hinders its practical applications31. Despite being less stable than Y2O3 and CaO, Al2O3 is still the best choice for casting TiAl alloys because of its good thermal shock resistance and lower cost48. Therefore, Al2O3 is often used as the crucible materials for the directional solidification of TiAl alloys32,33,34,36. Coatings are commonly applied to Al2O3 crucible in directional solidification experiments involving TiAl alloys49. However, the contamination of Y2O3 particles by atmospheric oxygen during the long solidification process needs to be minimized.

The purpose of the present work is to investigate the microstructure formation and interface characteristics of directionally solidified Ti-43Al-3Si (at.%) alloys with a new Y2O3 skull-aided technology under different reaction times. These results will contribute to the surface quality control of investment casting and the directional solidification of TiAl-based alloys.

Results and Discussion

Microstructure formation

The structure of the directionally solidified Ti-43Al-3Si (at.%) alloy is shown in Fig. 1. The macrostructure of the specimen is shown in Fig. 1a. The specimen grew with columnar grains aligned along the drawing direction. The morphology of the solid-liquid interface was preserved by quenching and was cellular under the present solidification conditions. The macrostructures on the transverse sections are shown in Fig. 1b1–e1. These images indicate that the microstructure was uniform throughout the entire specimen. The microstructure of the Ti-43Al-3Si (at.%) alloy after directional solidification is a full-lamellar structure with silicide, as shown in Fig. 1b2–e2.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Microstructure of the directionally solidified Ti-43Al-3Si (at.%) at a growth rate of 10 μm/s using Y2O3 skull-aided technology: (a) longitudinal section, (b) to (e) transverse sections at different distances from the bottom of the specimen at (b) 10 mm, at (c) 20 mm, at (d) 30 mm and at (e) 40 mm from the bottom of the specimen. The right sides are high magnification images corresponding to transverse sections at different positions.

According to the XRD pattern shown in Fig. 2, the specimen consisted of TiAl, Ti3Al and Ti5Si3 phases. Y2O3 particles were not found in the specimen, unlike the results of previous studies30. This lack of Y2O3 particles is attributed to the coating of the mould being prepared using fine Y2O3 powder without a binder, resulting in fewer Y2O3 particles being split from the coating via thermal physical erosion. These observations indicate that the poor thermal shock resistance of the Y2O3 crucible could be improved using this method. Backscattered electron (BSE) mode scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the microstructures are shown in Fig. 3. A Composition analysis of the phases was conducted using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX); the results are shown in Fig. 4. On the basis of the EDX results, the black, grey and white phases were identified as TiAl, Ti3Al and Ti5Si3 phases, respectively.

Figure 2. X-ray diffraction pattern of a directionally solidified Ti-43Al-3Si (at.%) alloy, revealing the existence of γ-TiAl, α2-Ti3Al and ξ-Ti5Si3 phases.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

SEM-BSE images on transverse sections of the directionally solidified Ti-43Al-3Si (at.%) alloy with different reaction times (a) 2800 s, (b) 3800 s, (c) 4800 s and (d) 5800 s.

Figure 4. EDX spectrum of phases present near the surface of the Ti-43Al-3Si (at.%) specimen directionally solidified in a Y2O3-coated Al2O3 crucible.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Interface characteristics

The surface morphology of the solidified specimen is shown in Fig. 4. A reaction region with inclusions was not formed as described by Cui50. Instead, a discontinuous bright layer with greater compactness on the surface was observed. As shown in Fig. 4, the bright layer consisted of Y, O, and areas of Al. Because the surface of the specimen was cleaned by ultrasonication before observation, the bright layer was a reaction layer between the Y2O3 skull and the TiAl melt rather than an adhesive layer of Y2O3 on the surface. The thickness of the reaction layer between the crucible and the melt increased with increasing reaction time, as shown in Fig. 5. The maximum thickness of the reaction layer was less than 15 μm, as shown in Fig. 5d. The severe reaction between the Al2O3 crucible and the melt for the directionally solidified specimen did not occur with a long reaction time (5800 s). This may be due to the high stability of Y2O3 in the TiAl melts diminishing the reaction between the mould and the TiAl melt.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Elemental distribution within the depth from the surface of the directionally solidified Ti-43Al-3Si (at.%) alloys with the following reaction times: (a) 2800 s, (b) 3800 s, (c) 4800 s and (d) 5800 s.

Variations in composition from the surface to the interior of the solidified specimen as a function of reaction times are shown in Fig. 5. The oxygen and yttrium contents were greater on the surface than inside the specimen. The oxygen and yttrium contents decreased rapidly from the surface towards the interior of the specimen. Hence, a reaction layer existed between the mould and the melt. According to Fig. 5, an Al-segregation region was not formed at the surface of the specimen, which is different from the results reported by Cui50. This difference arises from the specimen being melted and directionally solidified in the Al2O3 crucible with the Y2O3 skull under controlled solidification parameters, specifically, the temperature gradient and the growth rate. The cooling rate at the surface of the specimen was lower, and the composition did not affect the solidification path.

The reactivity of the mould and the TiAl melt is related to the Gibbs free energy changes during the reaction. Kostov51 recently reported that the standard Gibbs free energy of Y2O3 is more negative than that of Ti oxides (i. e., TiO, Ti2O3, TiO2). Thus, the molten TiAl alloy does not react with the Y2O3 skull spontaneously. However, a reaction layer is formed in the directionally solidified specimen. Saha et al.52,53 have indicated that the standard Gibbs free energy could not fully explain the reactivity of the oxides and the molten metal. According to previous research results30,50 the increased oxygen in the specimen during solidification is dependent on the dissolution of the Y2O3 according to the following reaction:

graphic file with name srep45198-m1.jpg

On the basis of the data presented in Fig. 5, the thickness of the surface layer increased with increasing growth distance or, more specifically, with increasing reaction time between the Y2O3 layer and the melt. Kuang47 reported that the relationship between the width of the reaction layer and the reaction time can be represented as follows:

graphic file with name srep45198-m2.jpg

where n is the time exponent and C is a constant for the given alloy and mould material. For the Ti-48Al-2Cr-2Mn (at.%) alloy, the values of n and C were 0.52 and 1.74, respectively47. The thickness of the reaction layer increased exponentially, as a function of equation (2), with increasing reaction time.

To evaluate the changes in the mechanical properties from the surface to the inner core of the directionally solidified specimen, we measured the specimen’s microhardness. The microhardness variation from the surface to the centre of the specimen is shown in Fig. 6. A hardened layer at the surface with a hardness of 480–510HV was observed, which is greater than that of the inner core of the specimen (approximately 450HV). According to the observation of the surface microstructure (Fig. 4), Y2O3 particles did not appeared in the specimen because the physical erosion of the Y2O3 skull was alleviated or eliminated. The greater hardness of the surface may be attributed to the solid-solute phase of oxygen that originated from the dissolution of the Y2O3 skull, as described by equation (1). The layer thickness increased with increasing reaction time. The thickness of this layer was less than 80 μm for reaction times up to 5800 s (46.7 minutes). Hence, we determined the surface contamination layer was less than 80 μm thick. This Y2O3 skull-aided technology is useful for the surface quality control while the casting of TiAl alloys with longer reaction times.

Figure 6. Microhardness profiles of the hardened layer at the surface of the Ti-43Al-3Si (at.%) alloy directionally solidified in an alumina crucible with Y2O3 skull-aided technology, as measured at different distances (h) from the bottom of the specimen.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Variation of the oxygen content during solidification

The total oxygen content of the directionally solidified Ti-43Al-3Si (at.%) alloys increased with increasing reaction time, as shown in Fig. 7. The oxygen content of the specimen directionally solidified in the Y2O3 skull-aided crucible (approximately 1019–1303 ppm) was lower than that of the specimen directionally solidified in an Al2O3 crucible studied by Fan (approximately 2600 ppm)49.

Figure 7. Variation in the oxygen content in the bulk alloy versus the reaction time for Ti-43Al-3Si (at.%) directionally solidified in an alumina crucible with Y2O3 skull-aided technology.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

According to the model established by Lapin30, the variation in the oxygen content with reaction time in the directionally solidified TiAl alloy can be expressed as:

graphic file with name srep45198-m3.jpg

where P is the oxygen content in the specimen after directional solidification, P0 is the original oxygen content of the specimen, k is a constant, t is the reaction time, Q0 is the activation energy, R is the universal gas constant, and T is the temperature of the melt.

In the current experiment, the value of P0 (419 ppm) was smaller than P (>1000 ppm). More specifically, the value of Inline graphic ≪ P3. If the value of P0 is ignored, the value of P can be simplified as

graphic file with name srep45198-m5.jpg

where Inline graphic.

By regression analysis, the relationship between the oxygen content and the reaction time is obtained as

graphic file with name srep45198-m7.jpg

The regression coefficient was R2 = 0.9901. The value of t = 0.345 agrees well with the value of t = 1/3 in Lapin’s model30.

Conclusions

  1. A new Y2O3 skull-aided technology was developed to reduce the reaction between the crucible and TiAl alloy melt during the directional solidification process with longer reaction times.

  2. After directional solidification, the specimen consisted of TiAl, Ti3Al and Ti5Si3 phases. Y2O3 particles were not found in the specimen because the Y2O3 particles that split from the coating due to thermal physical erosion were markedly reduced.

  3. The oxygen content P increased with increasing reaction time according to the equation P = 1.821t0.345.

  4. The hardened layer at the surface was less than 80 μm thick, which is acceptable for the surface quality control of near-net shapes and investment casting of TiAl-based alloys.

Methods

The master ingot with a nominal composition of Ti-43Al-3Si (at.%) was prepared using cold crucible induction technology in an argon environment; Ti (99.7%), Al (99.9%) and Si (99.9%) were used as the raw materials. The actual chemical composition was obtained by X-ray fluorescence analysis (Axios PW 4400). The oxygen content of the alloy ingot was measured using a CHNS/O elemental analyser. The analysed samples were approximately ∅5 mm × 10 mm. The oxygen content was obtained by measuring the CO2 present via using infrared detection. Table 1 shows the measured composition of the prepared alloy. The samples used for the directional solidification experiments were rods (∅6 mm × 100 mm) cut from the ingot using a wire electrical discharge machine.

Table 1. Chemical composition of the Ti-43Al-3Si (at.%) ingot.

Element Ti Al Si O
at.% Balance 43.27 3.08 0.10 (419 ppm)
Open in a new tab

To minimize the reaction between the Al2O3 crucible and the melt, a skull-aided technology was used for the directional solidification of the TiAl-based alloy. This technology used fine mixed powders (nanoscale and microscale) of high-purity Y2O3 without a binder to fill in the interspaces between the alumina crucible and the specimen under a certain pressure. A schematic of the technology is shown in Fig. 8a. The pressure and density of the Y2O3 skull were carefully controlled. After the specimen and crucible were heated, the Y2O3 coat became an integral skull and separated the melt from the Al2O3 crucible.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

Schematics of (a) the specimen with skull-aided technology and (b) the Bridgman-type directional solidification furnace.

The directional solidification experiments were performed in a Bridgman-type system, as shown in Fig. 8b. The samples were placed into 99.99% pure alumina crucibles with a 6.5/7.5 mm diameter (inside/outside diameter) Y2O3 skull and a length of 100 mm. Because of the reactivity of the molten TiAl alloy, the temperature gradient was measured by W/Re thermocouples that were positioned near the outside surface of the alumina tubes to avoid damaging the thermocouple, as shown in Fig. 8b. The chamber of the directional solidification furnace was evacuated to 10−4 Pa and filled with argon to avoid oxidation. The specimen was heated to 1823 K over 2 h and thermally stabilized for 1800 s. The specimen was then directionally solidified with a growth rate of 10 μm/s. The growth length of the samples was 40 mm during the directional solidification process. At the end of the experiment, the sample was quenched with a liquid Ga-In-Sn alloy to restore the solid/liquid interface.

The reaction time t2 during directional solidification was calculated by d/V, where d is the growth distance and V is growth rate. Because the time needed to thermally stabilized the specimen was t1 = 1800 s, the total reaction time t was t = t1 + t2.

The specimens were cut, polished and etched with a solution of 10 mL HF, 10 mL of HNO3, and 180 mL of H2O for further analysis. Both optical microscopy (OM) and SEM with the BSE mode were used to characterize the microstructure of the specimens. The phases were identified using a Rigaku D/max-RB X-ray diffractometer equipped with a monochromatic Cu-Kα radiation source. The elemental distributions were analysed by electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) under an acceleration voltage of 15 kV (±2% to 5%).

To evaluate the thickness of the hardened layer, the microhardness values were measured on transverse sections of the specimens with a test load of 100 g, and a dwell time of 10 s. The adopted values of the microhardness were the average values of at least 10 tests on each sample.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Fan, J. et al. Microstructure formation and interface characteristics of directionally solidified TiAl-Si alloys in alumina crucibles with a new Y2O3 skull-aided technology. Sci. Rep. 7, 45198; doi: 10.1038/srep45198 (2017).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants no. 51501167), the Science and Technology Open Cooperation Project of Henan Province (Grant no. 162106000019) and the Doctor Research Foundation of Zhengzhou University of Light Industry (Grant no. 2014BSJJ049).

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Author Contributions J.L.F., J.X.L. and J.J.G. designed the experiments. S.W. and S.Y.W. carried out the experiments. S.X.T. analysed the microstructures and performed the hardness tests. X.W. performed the oxygen content tests. J.L.F., X.W. and J.J.G. wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

References

  1. Su Y. et al. Lamellar Orientation Control in Directionally Solidified TiAl Intermetallics. China Foundry 219–231 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  2. Clemens H. & Mayer S. Design, Processing, Microstructure, Properties, and Applications of Advanced Intermetallic TiAl Alloys. Adv. Eng. Mater. 15, 191–215 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  3. Wu X. Review of Alloy and Process Development of TiAl Alloys. Intermetallics. 14, 1114–1122 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  4. Clemens H. & Kestler H. Processing and Applications of Intermetallic γ-TiAl-based Alloys. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2, 551–570 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  5. Loria E. A. Gamma Titanium Aluminides as Prospective Structural Materials. Intermetallics. 8, 1339–1345 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  6. Gupta R. K., Pant B. & Sinha P. P. Theory and Practice of γ+α2 Ti Aluminide: A Review. Trans. Indian Ins. Met. 67, 143–165 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  7. Fu P. X. et al. Centrifugal Casting of TiAl Exhaust Valves. Intermetallics. 16, 130–138 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  8. Johnson D. R., Chihara K., Inui H. & Yamaguchi M. Microstructural Control of TiAl-Mo-B Alloys by Directional Solidification. Acta Mater. 46, 6529–6540 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  9. Johnson D. R., Masuda Y., Inui H. & Yamaguchi M. Alignment of the TiAl/Ti3Al Lamellar Microstructure in TiAl Alloys by Growth From a Seed Material. Acta Mater. 45, 2523–2533 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  10. Liu G. et al. Study On the Microstructure, Phase Transition and Hardness for the TiAl–Nb Alloy Design During Directional Solidification. J. Alloys Compd. 650, 45–52 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  11. Kartavykh A. V., Tcherdyntsev V. V., Gorshenkov M. V. & Kaloshkin S. D. Microstructure Engineering of TiAl-based Refractory Intermetallics within Power-Down Directional Solidification Process. J. Alloys Compd. 586, Supplement 1, S180–S183 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  12. Ding X. F., Lin J. P., Zhang L. Q., Su Y. Q. & Chen G. L. Microstructural Control of TiAl-Nb Alloys by Directional Solidification. Acta Mater. 60, 498–506 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  13. Fan J. et al. Lamellar Orientation Control of Directionally Solidified Ti-46Al-0.5W-0.5Si Alloy by Self-Seeding Technology. Mater. Sci. Tech. 30, 183–188 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  14. Lapin J. & Gabalcovά Z. Solidification Behavior of TiAl-based Alloys Studied by Directional Solidification Technique. Intermetallics. 19, 797–904 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen R. et al. A Novel Method for Grain Refinement and Microstructure Modification in TiAl Alloy by Ultrasonic Vibration. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 653, 23–26 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  16. Dong S. et al. Deformation Behavior and Microstructural Evolution of Directionally Solidified TiAlNb-based Alloy During Thermo-Compression at 1373–1573K. Mater. Des. 84, 118–132 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen R. et al. Microstructure Evolution and Mechanical Properties of Directionally-Solidified TiAlNb Alloy in Different Temperature Gradients. J. Alloys Compd. 648, 667–675 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  18. Dong S. et al. Microstructure Control and Mechanical Properties of Ti44Al6Nb1.0Cr2.0V Alloy by Cold Crucible Directional Solidification. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 614, 67–74 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  19. Ding H., Wang Y., Chen R., Guo J. & Fu H. Effect of Growth Rate On Microstructure and Tensile Properties of Ti–45Al–2Cr–2Nb Prepared by Electromagnetic Cold Crucible Directional Solidification. Mater. Des. 86, 670–678 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  20. Du Y., Shen J., Xiong Y., Ren C. & Fu H. Lamellar Microstructure Alignment in Ti-47Al Alloy by Electromagnetic Confinement and Directional Solidification Using a Seed. Jom-Us. 67, 1258–1264 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  21. Du Y. et al. Determining the Effects of Growth Velocity on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Ti-47Al Alloy using Electromagnetic Confinement and Directional Solidification. Jom-Us. 66, 1914–1922 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  22. Du Y. et al. Lamellar Microstructure Alignment and Fracture Toughness in Ti–47Al Alloy by Electromagnetic Confinement and Directional Solidification. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 621, 94–99 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  23. Tetsui T., Kobayashi T., Kishimoto A. & Harada H. Structural Optimization of an Yttria Crucible for Melting TiAl Alloy. Intermetallics. 20, 16–23 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  24. Lapin J., Gabalcová Z. & Pelachová T. Effect of Y2O3 Crucible On Contamination of Directionally Solidified Intermetallic Ti–46Al–8Nb Alloy. Intermetallics. 19, 396–403 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  25. Kuang J. P., Harding R. A. & Campbell J. Investigation Into Refractories as Crucible and Mould Materials for Melting and Casting γ-TiAl Alloys. Mater. Sci. Tech. 16, 1007–1016 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  26. Frueh C., Poirier D. R., Maguire M. C. & Harding R. A. Attempts to Develop a Ceramic Mould for Titanium Casting–A Review. Int. J. Cast. Metal. Res. 9, 233–239 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  27. Bewlay B. P., Nag S., Suzuki A. & Weimer M. J. TiAl Alloys in Commercial Aircraft Engines. Mater. High Temp. (2016). [Google Scholar]
  28. Clemens H. & Mayer S. Intermetallic Titanium Aluminides in Aerospace Applications – Processing, Microstructure and Properties. Mater. High Temp. 33, 560–570 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  29. Cui R. et al. Interactions Between γ-TiAl Melt and Y2O3 Ceramic Material During Directional Solidification Process. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China. 21, 2415–2420 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  30. Lapin J. & Gabalcová Z. Solidification Behaviour of TiAl-based Alloys Studied by Directional Solidification Technique. Intermetallics. 19, 797–804 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  31. Gomes F., Barbosa J. & Ribeiro C. S. Induction Melting of γ-TiAl in CaO Crucibles. Intermetallics. 16, 1292–1297 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  32. Fan J., Li X., Su Y., Guo J. & Fu H. Dependency of Microhardness On Solidification Processing Parameters and Microstructure Characteristics in the Directionally Solidified Ti–46Al–0.5W–0.5Si Alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 504, 60–64 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  33. Lapin J., Ondrúš L. & Nazmy M. Directional Solidification of Intermetallic Ti-46Al-2W-0.5Si Alloy in Alumina Moulds. Intermetallics. 10, 1019–1031 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  34. Fan J., Li X., Su Y., Guo J. & Fu H. The Microstructure Parameters and Microhardness of Directionally Solidified Ti–43Al–3Si Alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 506, 593–599 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  35. Fan J. et al. Microstructure Evolution and Interfacial Reaction of TiAl–Si Alloy Solidified in Alumina Crucible. Mater. Sci. Tech. 31, 1727–1734 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  36. Lapin J., Ondrúš L. & Bajana O. Effect of Al2O3 Particles On Mechanical Properties of Directionally Solidified Intermetallic Ti-46Al-2W-0.5Si Alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 360, 85–95 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  37. Cheng X., Yuan C., Blackburn S. & Withey P. A. The Influence of ZrO2 Concentration in an Yttria-Based Face Coat for Investment Casting a Ti-45Al-2Mn-2Nb-0.2TiB Alloy Using a Sessile Drop Method. Metall. Mater. Trans. A. 46, 1328–1336 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  38. Jia Q., Cui Y. Y. & Yang R. Intensified Interfacial Reactions Between Gamma Titanium Aluminide and CaO Stabilised ZrO2. Int. J. Cast. Metal. Res. 17, 23–28 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  39. Yuan C., Cheng X. & Withey P. A. Investigation Into the Use of CaZrO3 as a Facecoat Material in the Investment Casting of TiAl Alloys. Mater. Chem. Phys. 155, 205–210 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  40. Kartavykh A. V., Tcherdyntsev V. V. & Zollinger J. TiAl–Nb Melt Interaction with AlN Refractory Crucibles. Mater. Chem. Phys. 116, 300–304 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  41. Kartavykh A. V., Tcherdyntsev V. V. & Zollinger J. TiAl–Nb Melt Interaction with Pyrolytic Boron Nitride Crucibles. Mater. Chem. Phys. 119, 347–350 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  42. Gao M. et al. Physical Erosion of Yttria Crucibles in Ti–54Al Alloy Casting Process. J. Mater. Process. Tech. 211, 2004–2011 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  43. Kartavykh A. V. et al. A Promising Microstructure/Deformability Adjustment of Β-Stabilized γ-TiAl Intermetallics. Mater. Lett. 162, 180–184 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  44. Yamaguchi M., Johnson D. R., Lee H. N. & Inui H. Directional Solidification of TiAl-based Alloys. Intermetallics. 8, 511–517 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  45. Johnson D. R., Inui H. & Yamaguchi M. Crystal Growth of TiAl Alloys. Intermetallics. 6, 647–652 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  46. Du Y., Shen J., Xiong Y., Shang Z. & Fu H. Stability of Lamellar Microstructures in a Ti–48Al–2Nb–2Cr Alloy During Heat Treatment and its Application to Lamellae Alignment as a Quasi-Seed. Intermetallics. 61, 80–84 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  47. Kuang J. P., Harding R. A. & Campbell J. A Study of Refractories as Crucible and Mould Materials for Melting and Casting gamma-TiAl Alloys. Int. J. Cast. Metal. Res. 13, 277–292 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  48. Cheng X., Yuan C., Shevchenko D. & Withey P. The Influence of Mould Pre-Heat Temperature and Casting Size On the Interaction Between a Ti–46Al–8Nb–1B Alloy and the Mould Comprising an Al2O3 Face Coat. Mater. Chem. Phys. 146, 295–302 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  49. Fan J., Li X., Su Y., Guo J. & Fu H. Effect of Growth Rate On Microstructure Parameters and Microhardness in Directionally Solidified Ti–49Al Alloy. Mater. Des. 34, 552–558 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  50. Cui R., Cao M., Zhang H. & Gong S. Interactions Between TiAl Alloys and Yttria Refractory Material in Casting Process. J. Mater. Process. Tech. 210, 1190–1196 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  51. Kostov B. & Friedrich A. Selection of Crucible Oxides in Molten Titanium and Titanium Aluminum Alloys by Thermo-Chemistry Calculations. J. Min. Met. 41B, 113–125 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  52. Saha R. L., Nandy T. K., Misra R. & Jacob K. T. Evaluation of the Reactivity of Titanium with Mould Materials During Casting. Bull. Mater. Sci. (1999). [Google Scholar]
  53. Saha R. L., Nandy T. K., Misra R. D. K. & Jacob K. T. On the Evaluation of Stability of Rare Earth Oxides as Face Coats for Investment Casting of Titanium. Metal. Trans. B. 21, 559–566 (1990). [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES