Table 2:
Summary of statistical analyses for data shown in Figures 3–7
| Type of test* | Analysis | Test value# | p value | Observed power | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a | Two-way RM ANOVA | Main effect, odor port | F(1,8) = 0.03 | 0.88 | 0.052 |
| b | Two-way RM ANOVA | Main effect, odor port | F(1,7) = 4.23 | 0.08 | 0.427 |
| c | Two-way RM ANOVA | Main effect, odor port | F(1,6) = 3.59 | 0.11 | 0.358 |
| d | Two-way RM ANOVA | Main effect, odor port | F(1,8) = 15.1 | 0.005 | 0.923 |
| e | Two-way RM ANOVA | Main effect, trial | F(1.65,15.7) = 7.96 | 0.007 | 0.861 |
| f | Two-way RM ANOVA | Interaction, odor port × trial | F(1.97,15.7) = 6.56 | 0.009 | 0.841 |
| g | Two-way RM ANOVA | Planned comparison, trials 3 and 5 vs trial 4 | F(1,8) = 15.2 | 0.005 | 0.925 |
| h | Two-way RM ANOVA | Planned comparison, trials 1 and 2 vs trial 4 | F(1,8) = 12.0 | 0.009 | 0.856 |
| i | Two-way RM ANOVA | Planned comparison, trials 1 and 2 vs trials 3 and 5 | F(1,8) = 7.46 | 0.026 | 0.668 |
| j | Two-way RM ANOVA | Main effect, odor port | F(1,8) = 1.79 | 0.218 | 0.219 |
| k | Two-way RM ANOVA | Main effect, trial | F(2.8,22.7) = 2.50 | 0.088 | 0.528 |
| l | Two-way RM ANOVA | Interaction, odor port × trial | F(5,40) = 4.08 | 0.004 | 0.924 |
| m | Two-way RM ANOVA | Planned comparison, trials 1 and 2 vs trials 4 and 6 | F(1,8) = 0.14 | 0.722 | 0.062 |
| n | Two-way RM ANOVA | Planned comparison, trials 3 and 5 vs trials 4 and 6 | F(1,8) = 10.3 | 0.012 | 0.802 |
| o | Two-way RM ANOVA | Planned comparison, trials 3 and 5 vs trials 1 and 2 | F(1,8) = 17.6 | 0.003 | 0.955 |
| p | Two-way RM ANOVA | Main effect, odor port | F(1,8) = 205.0 | 0.0001 | 1.000 |
| q | Two-way RM ANOVA | Planned comparison, trials 1, 2 and 6 vs trial 4 | F(1,8) = 63.6 | 0.0001 | 1.000 |
| r | Two-way RM ANOVA | Planned comparison, trials 1, 2 and 6 vs trials 3 and 5 | F(1,8) = 83.1 | 0.0001 | 1.000 |
| s | Two-way RM ANOVA | Planned comparison, trials 3 and 5 vs trial 4 | F(1,8) = 4.85 | 0.059 | 0.491 |
| t | Two-way RM ANOVA | Main effect, odor port | F(1,7) = 33.3 | 0.0007 | 0.998 |
| u | Two-way RM ANOVA | Planned comparison, trials 1 and 2 vs trial 4 | F(1,7) = 22.4 | 0.002 | 0.980 |
| v | Two-way RM ANOVA | Planned comparison, trials 3 and 5 vs trial 4 | F(1,7) = 2.05 | 0.195 | 0.237 |
| w | Two-way RM ANOVA | Main effect, trial | F(5,35) = 7.88 | 0.0001 | 0.998 |
| x | Two-way RM ANOVA | Main effect, odor port | F(1,7) = 0.009 | 0.925 | 0.051 |
| y | Two-way RM ANOVA | Interaction, odor port × trial | F(5,35) = 1.30 | 0.285 | 0.404 |
| z | Two-way RM ANOVA | Planned comparison, trials 1 and 2 vs trials 4 and 6 | F(1,7) = 10.4 | 0.014 | 0.790 |
| aa | Two-way RM ANOVA | Planned comparison, trials 1 and 2 vs trials 3 and 5 | F(1,7) = 10.3 | 0.015 | 0.785 |
| bb | Two-way RM ANOVA | Planned comparison, trials 3 and 5 vs trials 4 and 6 | F(1,7) = 0.026 | 0.876 | 0.052 |
| cc | Two-way RM ANOVA | Main effect, odor port | F(1,7) = 53.6 | 0.0002 | 1.000 |
| dd | Two-way RM ANOVA | Planned comparison, trials 1, 2 and 6 vs trial 4 | F(1,7) = 47.4 | 0.0002 | 1.000 |
| ee | Two-way RM ANOVA | Planned comparison, trials 1, 2 and 6 vs trials 3 and 5 | F(1,7) = 36.4 | 0.001 | 0.999 |
| ff | Two-way RM ANOVA | Planned comparison, trials 3 and 5 vs trial 4 | F(1,7) = 0.136 | 0.282 | 0.173 |
| gg | t test (paired) | Third water trial vs first IMU trial | t6 = 2.66 | 0.04 | 0.604 |
| hh | t test (paired) | Third IMU trial vs first EFU trial | t6 = 4.12 | 0.006 | 0.926 |
| ii | Two-way RM ANOVA | Main effect, odor port | F(1,6) = 43.1 | 0.0006 | 1.000 |
| jj | Two-way RM ANOVA | Main effect, trial | F(4,24) = 10.2 | 0.0001 | 0.999 |
| kk | Two-way RM ANOVA | Interaction, odor port × trial | F(4,24) = 17.7 | 0.0001 | 1.000 |
| ll | Two-way RM ANOVA | Planned comparison, trials 1 and 2 vs trial 4 | F(1,6) = 17.3 | 0.006 | 0.931 |
| mm | Two-way RM ANOVA | Planned comparison, trials 1 and 2 vs trials 3 and 5 | F(1,7) = 36.2 | 0.001 | 0.998 |
| nn | Two-way RM ANOVA | Planned comparison, trials 3 and 5 vs trial 4 | F(1,6) = 3.45 | 0.113 | 0.347 |
| oo | Two-way RM ANOVA | Main effect, odor port | F(1,6) = 1.85 | 0.223 | 0.210 |
| pp | Two-way RM ANOVA | Main effect, trial | F(2.17,13.0) = 2.62 | 0.107 | 0.445 |
| Two-way RM ANOVA | Interaction, odor port × trial | F(2.3,14.0) = 3.03 | 0.075 | 0.526 | |
| rr | Two-way RM ANOVA | Planned comparison, trials 1 and 2 vs trials 4 and 6 | F(1,6) = 2.38 | 0.174 | 0.256 |
| ss | Two-way RM ANOVA | Planned comparison, trials 1 and 2 vs trials 3 and 5 | F(1,6) = 3.76 | 0.101 | 0.372 |
| tt | Two-way RM ANOVA | Planned comparison, trials 3 and 5 vs trials 4 and 6 | F(1,6) = 1.87 | 0.221 | 0.212 |
| uu | t test (paired) | Timed: intromissions, laser-ON vs laser-OFF | t6 = 0.389 | 0.711 | 0.063 |
| vv | t test (paired) | Triggered: intromissions, laser-ON vs laser-OFF | t6 = 3.27 | 0.017 | 0.777 |
Letters in first column refer to tests shown in the Results. RM, repeated measures.
*
All tests based on normal distribution.
#
Tests that violated the sphericity assumption are shown after Hunyh-Feldt correction.