Abstract
Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) is one major type of contagious and foodborne pathogens. The type VI secretion system (T6SS) has been shown to be involved in the bacterial pathogenicity and bacteria-bacteria competition. Here, we show that EHEC could secrete a novel effector KatN, a Mn-containing catalase, in a T6SS-dependent manner. Expression of katN is promoted by RpoS and OxyR and repressed by H-NS, and katN contributes to bacterial growth under oxidative stress in vitro. KatN could be secreted into host cell cytosol after EHEC is phagocytized by macrophage, which leads to decreased level of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) and facilitates the intramacrophage survival of EHEC. Finally, animal model results show that the deletion mutant of T6SS was attenuated in virulence compared with the wild type strain, while the deletion mutant of katN had comparable virulence to the wild type strain. Taken together, our findings suggest that EHEC could sense oxidative stress in phagosome and decrease the host cell ROS by secreting catalase KatN to facilitate its survival in the host cells.
Author summary
The type VI secretion system (T6SS) is a specific macromolecular protein export apparatus, and widely distributed in Gram-negative bacteria. Generally, T6SS has been shown to play an important role in anti-bacterial competition and virulence to eukaryotic hosts. Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) can cause severe foodborne disease, including abdominal cramps and diarrhea that may progress to bloody diarrhea and hemolytic uremic syndrome. In the current study, we show that the T6SS of EHEC is involved in its intracellular survival and virulence in mice. Specifically, the novel effector KatN, a Mn-catalase identified in this work updates the general role of the T6SS in the pathogenesis of EHEC, in the context of oxidative stress in host cytoplasm. Combined with the biased distribution of katN in the T6SS-containing bacteria, our data suggest that KatN, as a new T6SS effector, is a key virulence factor in the pathogenesis of T6SS+ bacteria.
Introduction
Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) is a globally important zoonotic pathogen capable of causing diarrhea, hemorrhagic colitis and hemolytic–uremic syndrome (HUS) [1]. A prominent feature of EHEC infection is its low infectious dose. A dose of 50–100 colony forming units (CFUs) of EHEC is sufficient to cause disease in healthy individuals [2]. EHEC consists of multiple serotypes, among which O157:H7 is the one most commonly linked to epidemic and sporadic diseases in humans throughout China, Japan, North America, and Europe.
For efficient colonization in human intestines, EHEC needs adhere to the follicle-associated epitheliums, which results in the rapid contact of EHEC with underlying macrophage cells [3,4]. Macrophages are important components of the host innate immune system, and the lamina propria of the large intestine is rich in macrophages. When the intestinal epithelial barrier is damaged and microorganisms cross the basement membrane, the macrophages may be the first line of host defense system. Macrophage cells produce and release reactive oxygen species (ROS) in response to phagocytosis or various stimuli [5]. ROS are short-lived molecules derived from incomplete reduction of oxygen metabolites that at high levels have a bactericidal function by damaging DNA, lipid, proteins, and membrane [6].
To survive, replicate, and disseminate throughout the body, bacterial pathogens, especially these intracellular bacteria must overcome the antimicrobial oxidative burst produced by macrophages. General ROS degradation enzymes including catalases, peroxidases, and superoxide dismutases are used by most bacteria to survive under oxidative stress [7]. E. coli possesses multiple distinct catalases to defend itself against oxidative stress, including hydroperoxidase I (HPI), KatG and hydroperoxidase II (HPII), KatE [8,9]. The alkyl hydroperoxide reductase complex, consisting of AhpC and AhpF, could catalyze the reduction of hydrogen peroxide in an NADH-dependent manner in E. coli [10]. Another plasmid-borne catalase-peroxidase, KatP, has been found to contribute to the complex gene network protecting EHEC from peroxide-mediated oxidative damage [11].
The intracellular survival of bacterial pathogens relies on the specialized secretory systems, which can inject bacterial effectors into the cytosol of host cells. The type VI secretion system (T6SS) is widely spread in both pathogenic [12] and non-pathogenic Gram-negative bacteria [13], and contributes to competition in bacterial communities by delivering bacteriolytic toxins to target cells [14]. Besides participating bacterial competition, T6SS is also involved in the pathogenicity of several Gram-negative pathogens [15–20].
More than 10 orthologs of known T6SS components are uncovered in genome-sequenced pathogenic E. coli strains by in silico analysis [21]. It has been shown that the T6SSs in both avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC) [22–24], enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC) [16] contribute to bacterial virulence. In the previous study, we showed that T6SS is functional in neonatal meningitis-causing E. coli K1 (NMEC), and two Hcp family proteins participate in different steps of bacterial interaction with human brain microvascular endothelial cells (HBMEC) in a coordinate manner, e.g., binding to and invasion of HBMEC, the cytokine and chemokine release followed by cytoskeleton rearrangement, and apoptosis [19].
Our preliminary data showed that both EHEC strains EDL933 and Sakai contain the T6SS gene cluster. We thus question whether the T6SS gene cluster plays roles in EHEC infection of host cells and/or competition with other bacteria. In this study, we confirmed that the T6SS of EHEC strain EDL933 is functional, and a novel T6SS effector protein KatN was identified to be the catalase secreted by EHEC to antagonize ROS of eukaryotic host cells to evade host immune killing.
Results
Analysis of the T6SS gene cluster in EHEC genome
Genome sequence analysis showed that a 37-kb DNA fragment encoding a putative T6SS existed in the genome of EHEC strain EDL933. This fragment possessed several typical features of a composite pathogenicity island: it is associated with a tRNA-encoding gene aspV and harbors virulence genes. Annotation showed that this gene cluster contained z0250, z0254, z0255, hcp-1, hcp-2, hcp-3, and z0267, which are homologous to vasK (icmF-like), vasH (clpV homolog), vasF (dotU homolog), hcp1, hcp2, hcp3, and vgrG in Vibrio cholerae, respectively (Fig 1). These genes represented the core and conserved accessory components of the T6SS, suggesting the T6SS is functional in EHEC. The detailed annotation of EHEC T6SS ORFs was listed in the S1 Table. In silico analysis also showed that EHEC had another two vgr genes, vgrG-2 (z0707) and vgrE (z2262) located in the other regions of genome. We then used our integrated database SecReT6 (http://db-mml.sjtu.edu.cn/SecReT6/) to compare the T6SS sequences [25], and found that the components and gene organization of the T6SS gene clusters were highly conserved in pathogenic E. coli strains compared with other bacteria including V. cholerae and Salmonella Typhimurium (S1 Fig).
The T6SS of EHEC is functional and repressed by H-NS
We reanalyzed our previous RNA-seq data and found that the expression of T6SS in vitro was relatively low compared with other genes in EHEC genome [26]. The average reads per kilobase per million (RPKM) of T6SS gene cluster (z0243 to z0275) was 5.7, while the average RPKM of EHEC whole genome was 198.1 (S2 Fig). We then tested different culture conditions, including salt, pH, media and growth temperature, to stimulate the expression of T6SS in vitro. However, the qPCR results showed that these conditions could not induce the expression of T6SS (S3 Fig), suggesting T6SS may not be required for EHEC growth in vitro. Consistent with this speculation, the growth rate of the deletion mutant of T6SS was comparable to that of the parental strain (S4 Fig).
Because the highly conserved histone-like global repressor H-NS was found to repress the expression of T6SS in V. cholerae [27], Edwardsiella tarda [28] and S. Typhimurium [29], we speculate that H-NS may be a repressor of the T6SS in EHEC. We thus constructed the deletion mutant of hns in EHEC by replacing hns gene with chloramphenicol resistance cassette using λ Red recombination system [30]. Then, the bacterial total RNA was isolated, and the transcription level of T6SS genes was measured by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). The results showed that the expression of all the tested T6SS genes were upregulated in the deletion mutant of hns significantly (Fig 2A). Hcp-2 (Z0264) is a homologue of Hcp (Hemolysin co-regulated protein), which is an essential member of T6SS and involved in the assembly of the cogwheel-like protein complex in V. cholerae [31]. As a hallmark of T6SS, the transcription of hcp-2 in the deletion mutant of hns increased by 60-fold compared with that of the parental strain. To exclude the potential polar effect of hns deletion, we used pACYC184 to deliver a copy of hns to the deletion mutant of hns. The qPCR result showed that the transcription of T6SS genes in the deletion mutant of hns was inhibited by hns complementation (Fig 2B).
The secretion of the T6SS hallmark effector protein Hcp is considered a reliable indicator of a functional T6SS [18,19]. We then used Western blot to investigate the secretion of Hcp to confirm the activity of T6SS and the repression of H-NS on the T6SS in EHEC. The deletion mutant of T6SS was constructed by replacing the 37 kb T6SS gene cluster with chloramphenicol resistance cassette. The mutant was verified by PCR and sequencing before further experiments. The Hcp-2 (Z0264) was fused by a His-tag sequence at C-terminus in the plasmid (pQE80-z0264), and the plasmid was transferred to the deletion mutants of T6SS or hns individually. After IPTG induction, the supernatants from these two strains were isolated and separated in SDS-PAGE. Western blot using anti-His antibody showed that Hcp-2 was expressed in the cytosol in both strains, but was only detected in the supernatant of the deletion mutant of hns (Fig 2C), suggesting that the T6SS was functional and could secrete hallmark effector protein Hcp-2 in EHEC.
Since the transcription of T6SS genes was upregulated in the deletion mutant of hns, we wonder whether the assembly of T6SS apparatus was also increased in this mutant. The assembly of an active T6SS can be visualized by fluorescent tagged ClpV, which is an AAA+ family protein that has been postulated to couple ATP hydrolysis to T6SS effector translocation. A functional T6SS apparatus results in a focused localization of ClpV, instead of diffused distribution [32]. We then fused GFP (green fluorescent protein) to the C-terminus of ClpV (Z0254) to visualize T6SS by co-incubating EHEC strains with E. coli K-12 strain MG1655 at a ratio of 10:1. The results showed that more hns mutant cells (47.0%) had GFP foci compared with the wild type strain (17.5%), indicating the deletion of hns could derepress the assembly of T6SS apparatus (Fig 2D). Interestingly, most GFP foci showed apparent polar localization in the deletion mutant of hns, which was contradictory to the central location of T6SS apparatus with bactericidal activity [33].
EHEC infection specifically results in the pathological attaching and effacing lesions of the follicle-associated epithelial layer [34], followed by rapid contact with underlying human macrophage cells. To test the role of T6SS in EHEC interaction with macrophages, we used RAW264.7 murine macrophage-like cells to study the intracellular survival of the wild type EHEC strain and the deletion mutant of T6SS. After 20 h incubation, the survival rate of the wild type strain in RAW264.7 cells was about 38.0%, while the survival rate of the deletion mutant of T6SS decreased dramatically to 24.8% (Fig 2E), suggesting that T6SS was involved in the intracellular survival of EHEC.
Bactericidal activity of EHEC T6SS is not detected in vitro
Recently, several findings reveal that T6SSs in some bacterial species have antagonistic bactericidal activity towards heterologous bacterial species [35–38]. The bactericidal activity of T6SS provides a strong competitive advantage against other bacteria in the host or the natural environments. As an intestinal pathogen, EHEC can colonize in the human intestine where a dense and diverse intestinal microbiota comprising a large amount of various bacteria exists [39]. It has been reported that P. aeruginosa could effectively kill Acinetobacter baylyi T6SS+ cells [33], so these two strains were included in the competition assay as the positive control. When mixed with P. aeruginosa ΔretS, a strain showing a dramatic increase in T6SS activity due to the derepression of T6SS by retS deletion, ~ 1000-fold fewer A. baylyi were recovered compared to that mixed with P. aeruginosa ΔppkA, a T6SS defective strain (Fig 3A). However, P. aeruginosa ΔretS could not kill the wild type EHEC strain (Fig 3B) or the deletion mutant of T6SS, and vice versa (Fig 3C and 3D). It has been shown that certain T6SSs can kill T6SS negative (T6SS-) species [33]. We wonder whether EHEC could kill T6SS- bacteria (e.g. E. coli K12 strain MG1655). As shown in Fig 3E, none of EHEC, Δhns, ΔT6SS or the double deletion mutant (Δhns/T6SS) could kill E. coli K12 strain, suggesting that EHEC did not have detectable bactericidal activity in vitro.
Identification of T6SS effectors in EHEC
Since T6SS was critical to EHEC survival in macrophages (Fig 2E), we propose that T6SS may utilize unknown effector(s) to achieve its roles in vivo. The supernatants from the deletion mutant of T6SS and the WT cultures were isolated and purified by combining ultrafiltration membrane package and centrifugal filter [19], and separated in SDS-PAGE (S5A Fig). The quality of the supernatants was confirmed by Western blot using the antibody of RNA polymerase subunit alpha (RpoA), a cytosol marker of E. coli (S5B Fig). The supernatants were applied to liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and proteins that were only present in the supernatant of the wild type strain but not that of the T6SS deletion mutant were considered as potential T6SS effector candidates in EHEC. We repeated the above LC-MS/MS analysis using two sets of biological samples and found 46 and 31 T6SS effector candidates, respectively (S2 Table). Further analysis showed that three candidates, Z0873, Z1921 and Z5583 were detected by both LC-MS/MS performances, suggesting these three proteins were likely to be T6SS effectors in EHEC.
We next used His-tag fusion strategy to verify the secretion pathway of the three candidates. The plasmids harboring z0873, z1921 or z5583 with a His-tag sequence fusion at their C-termini were constructed and transformed to the T6SS deletion mutant or the wild type strain individually. The culture supernatants from these strains were isolated by trichloroacetic acid (TCA) precipitation [40] and separated in SDS-PAGE followed by Western blot using anti-His tag antibody. The results showed that all the three proteins were expressed in the bacterial cytosols, and only z0873 and z1921 could be secreted into supernatants. Because Z0873 was detected in the supernatants of both the WT and T6SS deletion mutant, we assumed that this protein was secreted in a T6SS-independent manner in EHEC and excluded for further analysis. Interestingly, Z1921 was only detected in the supernatant of the WT, but not in that of T6SS deletion mutant (Fig 4A), suggesting that the secretion of Z1921 was dependent on the T6SS in EHEC. Amino acids sequence analysis showed that Z1921 of EHEC shared 84% identity and 93% similarity with Mn-containing catalase KatN of Salmonella enterica [41], therefore Z1921 was named as KatN (S6 Fig).
We then transformed the plasmid harboring KatN-His tag fusion into the deletion mutant of z0254 (clpV). The supernatants of strains Δz0254, ΔT6SS and the WT bearing KatN-His tag fusion plasmid were isolated and applied to Western blot to check the secretion pathway of KatN. The result showed that the loss of z0254 alone or T6SS as a whole caused the failure of KatN secretion in EHEC (Fig 4B).
To consolidate these findings, we transformed pCX-katN (KatN-bla fusion was made by the insertion of the bla gene at the C-terminus of katN) into the WT and Δz0254 or ΔT6SS individually and examined the β-lactamase activity in the bacterial culture supernatants as described previously [19]. In this condition, the secretion of β-lactamase is dependent on the secretion of KatN. As expected, significant color change of nitrocefin was detected in the culture supernatant of WT-pCX-katN, while only marginal color alteration was observed in these of ΔT6SS-pCX-katN or Δz0254-pCX-katN, which may be due to the leaky expression of β-lactamase (Fig 4C). In addition, we also examined the translocation of the KatN fusions in infected RAW264.7 cells by using TEM-1 β-lactamase as a fluorescence-based reporter [42]. EHEC strains expressing the above-mentioned fusion proteins were used to infect RAW264.7 cells, and the KatN-bla fusion protein levels at the WT and ΔT6SS were comparable (S7 Fig). After 3 h incubation, the cells were washed and incubated for an additional 60 min with the β-lactamase substrate CCF2. The cells were then analyzed by a confocal microcopy with the simultaneous observation of the green fluorescence emitted by the CCF2-AM substrate and the blue fluorescence emitted by the cleaved CCF2-AM. Cells infected with ΔT6SS harboring pCX-katN fusions appeared dominantly green, indicating the absence of β-lactamase activity in these cells. In contrast, cells infected with EHEC expressing KatN fused to β-lactamase showed strong blue fluoresce signals (Fig 4D). The percentage of blues cells was about 76% in RAW264.7 cells infected by the WT EHEC bearing pCX-katN, while the percentages in control groups (WT-pCX340 and ΔT6SS-pCX-katN) were only about 33% (S8 Fig), indicating that KatN was efficiently translocated into the cells.
To avoid any effects that might result from overexpression of a plasmid-encoded gene, we then prepared polyclonal antibody of KatN and used this antibody to check the secretion of KatN in the supernatants of the deletion mutants of z0254, T6SS or the WT. The results again confirmed that KatN could only be detected in the supernatants of the WT, but not in these of the deletion mutants of z0254 or T6SS (Fig 4E). Furthermore, our data showed that the secretion deficiency of KatN due to the loss of z0254 could be restored by complementation (S9 Fig). Since T3SS of EHEC is responsible for the secretion of multiple effectors [43], we then tested the relationship between the secretion of KatN and T3SS, and results showed that the absence of a key T3SS gene, escN, did not disturb the secretion of KatN, indicating that T3SS was not involved in the secretion of KatN in EHEC (S10 Fig). Taken together, these data clearly demonstrated that KatN was secreted via T6SS in EHEC.
Role and expression regulation of katN
Since KatN of EHEC may be a Mn-containing catalase, we then overexpressed and purified KatN to apparent homogeneity (S11A Fig) to check its catalase activity. The result showed that the specific activity of KatN is 268.3 U/mg protein (S11B Fig). Since KatN has a high catalase activity, we wonder whether it contributes to the EHEC response to oxidative stress. Thus, we used different concentrations of hydrogen peroxide to treat the WT, ΔkatN and ΔkatN-c, and monitored the bacterial growth. The absence of katN did not affect the bacterial growth in regular LB medium (S4 Fig), but caused the growth defect of EHEC under hydrogen peroxide concentrations from 1 mM to 2 mM (Fig 5A). This growth retardation could be restored by complementation of a copy of katN, indicating that katN contributed to EHEC response to oxidative stress in vitro.
It has been shown that OxyR is a principal regulator for hydrogen peroxide detoxification, and RpoS is a general stress response regulator at the stationary phase [44]. Since the expression of catalases KatE and KatG was regulated by OxyR and RpoS [45], we speculate that expression of katN might be regulated by these two regulators. The deletion mutants of oxyR, rpoS as well as the WT and ΔT6SS were treated by hydrogen peroxide, and qPCR was employed to determine the transcriptional levels of katN compared to mock treatment in these strains. The results of qPCR showed that both OxyR and RpoS were involved in the activation of katN regardless of the presence or absence of hydrogen peroxide. Specifically, RpoS was essential for katN transcription, and OxyR promoted the transcription of katN (Fig 5B). Morgan et al. demonstrates that KatG and AhpC are induced by hydrogen peroxide in S. Typhimurium [46], while our data showed that hydrogen peroxide did not induce the transcription of katN in EHEC, which is similar to the case of HPII KatE [47]. Moreover, the deletion of T6SS gene cluster did not affect the transcription of katN. The protein levels of KatN in the above conditions were determined by Western blot using anti-KatN antibody, showing that KatN protein levels were well correlated with the mRNA levels of katN in both log phase and stationary phase (Fig 5C).
As a global regulator, H-NS could inhibit the transcription of T6SS in EHEC. We then tested whether the transcription of katN and other catalase genes, katG and katE is also regulated by H-NS. The qPCR results showed that transcriptional level of katN increased by over 450-fold in the deletion mutant of hns compared with that of the WT (Fig 5D). Another catalase gene katE was upregulated in the deletion mutant of hns, however, transcription of katG was barely promoted in the deletion mutant of hns. The repression of H-NS on the expression of katN was further confirmed by Western blot using anti-KatN antibody (Fig 5E).
EHEC has multiple catalases to resist oxidative stress [11,48,49]. Given the previous evidence that KatN was secreted by T6SS, we further wonder whether EHEC could secrete other catalases through the same secretory apparatus for better intracellular survival. We then used His-tag strategy to determine the secretion pattern of all the catalases KatE, KatG, KatP and AhpC in EHEC. The results showed that all the catalases were expressed in the cytosols of the WT, ΔT6SS and Δz0254, but none of these catalases could be secreted (S12 Fig), suggesting KatN was the sole secreted catalase in EHEC up to date.
KatN plays an important role for the survival of EHEC in macrophages
EHEC infection specifically results in the pathological attaching and effacing lesions of the follicle-associated epithelium [34], followed by its rapid contact with underlying human macrophage cells. To test the role of katN in EHEC interaction with macrophages, we used murine macrophage cell line RAW264.7 to study the survival of the wild type EHEC strain and its derived mutants. After 20 h incubation, the survival rate of the wild type strain in RAW264.7 cells is about 38.0%, while the survival rate of the deletion mutant of katN decreased dramatically to 16.1%. The survival defect of the deletion mutant of katN could be restored to by introducing a copy of katN (Fig 6A). This observation was confirmed by using primary peritoneal macrophage cells (Fig 6B), suggesting that katN contributed to the survival of EHEC in macrophage cells.
Since T6SS played an important role in the survival of EHEC in macrophage cells (Fig 2E), while the expression of T6SS was relatively low in vitro (S2 Fig), we speculate that the expression of T6SS may be induced when EHEC was phagocytized. To test this hypothesis, we infected RAW264.7 cells with the wild type EHEC strain and isolated the intracellular bacteria, followed by total RNA purification and qPCR analysis. The result showed that the expression of T6SS was upregulated dramatically. The transcriptional levels of all the tested genes including z0254, z0264, z0266 and z0267 were increased by 40, 8, 7 and 8 fold compared with these of the genes in vitro, respectively (Fig 6C). We also studied the transcriptional levels of all the catalases genes in EHEC including katN, katE, katG, katP, and ahpC and found that all catalases genes were upregulated by 4 fold to 67 fold in the intracellular bacteria except ahpC (S13 Fig). These data suggested that after phagocytosis by macrophage, EHEC induced the expression of T6SS and catalases for a better intramacrophage survival.
Next, we want to give direct evidence that KatN is secreted when EHEC is phagocytized by macrophage. To address this question, we used the wild type EHEC strain, the deletion mutant of T6SS, the deletion mutant of katN, and katN complementation strain by introducing KatN-expression plasmid in the katN deletion background (ΔkatN-c) to infect RAW264.7 cells. Cells were then stained by DAPI (4’,6’-diamidino-2-phenylindole), anti-EHEC LPS antibody or anti-KatN antibody, followed by corresponding fluorescent-dye conjugated secondary antibodies detection. The anti-EHEC LPS antibody indicated that the infection rates of RAW264.7 cells by different EHEC strains were similar. As we expected, the WT EHEC-infected RAW264.7 cells showed strong KatN fluorescence signal in the cytosol, while neither ΔT6SS- nor ΔkatN-infected RAW264.7 cells showed KatN signal. When a copy of katN was introduced into ΔkatN, the signal of KatN reappeared in the cytosol of RAW264.7 cells (Fig 6D).
As innate immune cell species, macrophages can generate ROS to kill some types of engulfed bacteria [5]. Since EHEC could secrete catalase KatN into host cell cytosol via T6SS, we speculate that EHEC may utilize the secreted KatN to antagonize host cell ROS to escape from killing by phagocytic cells. Therefore, we used HyPer-3, a genetically encoded fluorescent indicator to determine intracellular ROS level in macrophages. Specifically, ROS can change the excitation spectrum of HyPer-3 with an excitation maximum at 405 nm for the reduced and 488 nm for the oxidized state, and the ratio of signals at 488 nm and 405 nm presents the intracellular ROS level [50]. In other words, higher ratio of signals at 488/405nm indicates a more oxidized intracellular environment, or high ROS stress. After 1 h incubation, the ratio between both channels (488 nm/405 nm) in uninfected cells was 1.17±0.03, while the ratio in the wild type EHEC-infected cells increased to 1.41±0.01. As we expected, the ratio of 488 nm/405 nm of RAW264.7 cells infected by the deletion mutant of T6SS increased to 1.52±0.05 (vs that of WT-infected cells: P<0.01) (Fig 6E). Interestingly, the ratio of 488 nm/405 nm in the deletion mutant of katN-infected cells reached 1.80±0.03 (vs that of WT-infected cells: P<0.001), while introduction of katN in the deletion mutant of katN (ΔkatN-c) decreased the ratio of 488 nm/405 nm to 1.28±0.12 (vs that of ΔkatN-infected cells: P<0.001). To confirm this observation, we used DCFH-DA (2,7-dichlorodi hydrofluorescein diacetate) to directly monitor the production of intracellular ROS [51]. We infected RAW264.7 cells with the deletion mutant of hns (Δhns), double deletion mutant of hns and katN (Δhns/ΔkatN), and katN complementation strain (Δhns/ΔkatN-c). After incubation and washing, DCFH-DA was applied to the cells followed by flow cytometry analysis. As we expected, the absence of katN increased the ROS level of RAW264.7 cells, which could be reverted by introducing a copy of katN (S14 Fig). These data showed that EHEC could utilize T6SS to secrete catalase KatN into host cells to decrease the ROS level and facilitate bacterial intracellular survival.
T6SS contributes to EHEC virulence in mouse model
To determine the contribution of T6SS to EHEC virulence in mouse model, the WT EHEC, ΔT6SS or ΔkatN strains were used to infect mice, respectively. Groups of 8 BALB/c mice were infected by oral gavage with 7×1010 CFU bacteria or Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and monitored for survival over a 16-day period. Mice infected with the WT or ΔkatN appeared ruffled fur immediately after administration and began dying both at day 3 post-infection, and were all dead within 5 days. However, 40% of ΔT6SS-infected mice were still alive (vs WT: P<0.001, Log-rank analysis) and showed no infection-associated morbidity such as ruffling of fur and wasting (Fig 7A). We also monitored the mice body weight during the whole experiment period, and the result showed that the WT- and ΔkatN-infected mice lost body weight dramatically after administration (vs ΔT6SS: P<0.001, at day 3, Student’s t test). Instead, ΔT6SS-infected mice lost body weight slightly compared with PBS control, and started to gain body weight from day 5 post-infection as PBS control (Fig 7B).
The bacterial load in feces was determined from day 1 to day 15 post-infection. The result showed that the colonization of all the three EHEC strains in the feces kept decreasing from day 1 post-infection. The bacterial burden in feces of ΔT6SS-infected mice was 7.6×107 CFU, while the bacterial burden in feces of the WT- or ΔkatN-infected mice were 8.8×108 CFU and 9.0×108 CFU (WT or ΔkatN vs ΔT6SS: P<0.001 at day 3), respectively on day 3 post-infection (Fig 7C). After 10 days post-infection, EHEC strains could not be detected in the feces of ΔT6SS infected mice, indicating that the bacteria were completely cleared from the gut.
Discussion
T6SS has been shown to be widely distributed in up to 25% of Gram-negative bacteria [21]. Although most of these bacteria possess only one single T6SS gene cluster, some species harbor multiple distinct T6SS copies. For example, five phylogenetically distinct T6SS loci have been identified in S. enterica [52], Burkholderia pseudomallei and Burkholderia thailandensis display six and five T6SSs, respectively [53], and P. aeruginosa possesses three T6SS clusters [54]. The distribution and copy number of T6SS in E. coli are various. APEC and EAEC contain up to 3 phylogenetically distinct T6SS clusters [55], while UPEC strain CFT037 only harbors one set of T6SS locus. There is one T6SS gene cluster in EHEC strains of Sakai and EDL933. Although the number of T6SS gene cluster is identical in UPEC and EHEC, the sequence and organization of their T6SS genes are distinct, suggesting the origin of T6SS is highly complicated.
T6SS has been extensively explored in bacterial antagonism in various environments. T6SS-dependent bactericidal activity was fulfilled by injecting an array of toxins to hydrolyze the prey cell wall. In this study, we found that both the wild type EHEC strain and the deletion mutant of hns (a T6SS activating strain) failed to kill T6SS+ or T6SS- bacteria (Fig 3D and 3E), suggesting that T6SS in EHEC does not have antibacterial activity in vitro. At this stage, we can not rule out the possibility that EHEC may have bactericidal activity in vivo. EHEC is a zoonotic pathogen that thrives in the rumen of cattle [56], we then used bile salt supplement to mimic the human gastrointestinal tract environment, and found that the transcription levels of T6SS genes were dramatically induced by bile salt supplement (S15A Fig). Moreover, we found that T6SS contributed to the resistance of EHEC to bile salt (S15B Fig). Considering the expression level difference of T6SS between in vitro and in vivo (Fig 6C), one might postulate that with an enhanced T6SS expression, EHEC may replicate and target host microbiota in a T6SS-mediated manner for better survival and competition with other bacteria and protozoans in the cattle rumen.
Since T6SS was initially identified as a virulence factor in E. tarda in 2004 [57], it has been associated with bacterial virulence-related phenotypes, including adhesion, invasion, cytoskeletal alteration, intracellular survival, cytotoxicity, and host response, suggesting T6SS is indeed crucial for pathogen virulence [15–20]. As a protein secretion machine, T6SS in pathogenic bacteria is supposed to secrete an array of effectors to mediate bacterial interaction with eukaryotic cells. The involvement of EHEC T6SS in virulence was proved in this study (Figs 2E and 7A). Although Shiga toxin is considered to be the major virulence factor of EHEC [56], we found that deletion of T6SS did not disturb the expression and secretion of Shiga toxin (S16 Fig), indicating that T6SS contributed to the pathogenesis of EHEC independent of Shiga toxin activity.
The T6SS-dependent effectors remain elusive. There are few virulence-related effectors identified in the past decade except canonical Hcp and Vgr family effectors, which were discovered more than ten years ago [18]. Up to now, only four non-canonical T6SS effectors were reported, including EvpP from E. tarda [58], VasX from V. cholerae [59,60], PldB from P. aeruginosa [61], and TecA in B. cenocepacia [62]. In this study, we identified a catalase KatN as a novel T6SS effector in EHEC, and this effector could decrease the ROS level of host cell to facilitate EHEC survival in phagocytic cells. EHEC possesses multiple catalases and peroxidases for defense against oxidative stress, including KatE, KatG, KatP, and alkyl hydroperoxide reductase AhpC [8,9,11]. AhpC and KatG are regulated by both OxyR and RpoS [46,63,64]. KatE is only induced by RpoS during the switch from exponential to stationary growth [47]. We found that KatN is also regulated by both OxyR and RpoS (Fig 5B), suggesting a complicated regulatory network in response to oxidative stress in EHEC.
Although EHEC has several catalases, it seems these catalases are not redundant and play protective roles under different circumstances. Both KatG and KatE scavenge hydrogen peroxide in E. coli, and KatG is the major protective enzyme when AhpC is saturated by high level of hydrogen peroxide [65]. Our previous RNA-Seq data showed that RPKMs of ahpC and katG are 3471.8 and 618.9, respectively, which are much higher than the average RPKM of whole genome [26]. Considering the RPKM of katN is 4.0 under in vitro condition, and the transcriptional level of katN in macrophage cells was increased by more than 10 fold (S13 Fig), we postulate katN is not critical for EHEC response to oxidative stress in vitro but rather plays an important role in the interaction between EHEC and the host phagocytic cells. The survival defect of katN deletion strain in macrophage clearly supported this hypothesis. The similar phenotype of ΔkatN as wild type strain in mouse model suggests other catalase(s) may play redundant roles in vivo.
We analyzed the distribution of katN in sequenced bacterial genomes and found that most pathogenic E. coli strains contain katN, and non-pathogenic E. coli strains do not possess katN. Moreover, katN and z1922, z1923 and z1924 consist of an operon in the genome of EHEC strain EDL933, which is highly homologous to the yciGFEkatN operon in S. Typhimurium [41]. When we extended the searching range from E. coli to other species, the results showed that most katN genes were linked to the operon yciGFE and located on a cryptic prophage (CP-933X), suggesting katN was acquired via horizontal gene transfer in EHEC. Further analysis showed that about 130 sequenced bacterial genomes contain katN, while most of them (100 of 130) were distributed in the T6SS containing bacterial species (S17 Fig), suggesting a co-existence of T6SS and katN in the pathogenic bacterial species. We further analyzed the distribution of katE, katG, ahpC and katP, and found that katE, katG and ahpC were highly conserved and wildly distributed in the bacterial genomes, while katP was only present in 47 species, and the distributions of the above genes were not correlated with these of T6SS clusters.
It has been reported that some bacteria species in human gut can induce rapid, physiological generation of ROS to regulate host immune function, intracellular signalling, and cytoskeletal dynamics [66–70]. For example, commensal bacteria, Lactobacillus can stimulate NADPH oxidase I to promote ROS generation in the gut [71]. On the other hand, intestinal pathogens must overcome the intestinal ROS barrier to colonize in the gastrointestinal tract to cause infection and disease. For instance, OxyR and two catalases are critical for scavenging environmental ROS to facilitate V. cholerae growth and zebrafish intestinal colonization [72]. The present work showed that EHEC could secrete catalase KatN in both cell contact-independent and contact-dependent manners. Therefore, we speculate that once entered into the intestine, EHEC might use T6SS to secrete catalase KatN to hydrolyze ROS around bacterial cell to form a low ROS level niche and facilitate EHEC population growth, further infection and development of disease.
Materials and methods
Strains, cell lines and growth conditions
The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this work were listed in S3 Table. E. coli O157:H7 strain EDL933 was used as the wild type EHEC strain. All mutants derived from strain EDL933 were constructed by λ Red recombinase system. E. coli BL21 (DE3) was used to overexpress KatN. E. coli DH5α was used for the cloning procedures. Mouse macrophage-like RAW264.7 cells obtained from Cell Resource Center of Shanghai Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences were used in this study. Bacteria were cultured routinely at 37°C in Luria Bertani (LB) medium unless noted otherwise. Cell lines were cultured in DMEM (10% FBS) at 37°C under 5% of CO2. Antibiotics were used at the following concentrations: ampicillin 50 μg/ml; gentamicin 100 μg/ml; chloramphenicol, 30 μg/ml; kanamycin, 50 μg/ml; streptomycin 200 mg/ml; tetracycline, 10 μg/ml.
Identification of T6SS by in sillico analysis
The core of T6SS is composed of 13 proteins. Genes encoding these proteins were chosen as baits in sequential BLASTN, BLASTX and BLASTP to identify homologues in the genome of EHEC strain EDL933 (e-value less than 10−5).
Plasmids and strains construction
The genomic DNA of E. coli was extracted using Easy-DNA kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The genes mentioned in this manuscript were amplified with the corresponding primers listed in S4 Table using the genomic DNA of EHEC strain EDL933 as template. The PCR products were digested with the corresponding restriction enzymes and then cloned into the appropriate vectors predigested by same restriction enzymes. The deletion mutant strains were constructed by the method described by Datsenko and Wanner [30]. Briefly, the EHEC strain EDL933 was transformed with the pKD46, which contains genes coding for the arabinose-induced λ Red recombinase system that promotes recombination between linear pieces of DNA (PCR products) and the host chromosome. The recombination is based on short stretches of homology (50 nucleotides) on the linear DNA to the site of recombination. The PCR products for knocking out the target genes were amplified, gel extracted, and electroporated into competent strain EDL933 containing pKD46 prepared with the presence of arabinose. The deletion mutants were screened by the antibiotics and were verified by PCR using primers adjacent to the gene region and followed by sequencing.
Identification of T6SS substrates
The secreted proteins were isolated by a previously method with some modifications [19]. The overnight inoculums of strain EDL933 and its derived mutants were diluted 1:100 into 1 L M9 minimal medium supplemented with 44 mM NaHCO3, 8 mM MgSO4, 0.4% glucose, and 0.1% Casamino Acids for further growth to an OD600 of 0.8, at 37°C. The supernatant was collected by centrifugation twice at 20,000 g for 15 min and then filtered through a 0.2 μm filter. The filtered supernatant was condensed 100 fold via Vivaflow 50 system, according to the manufacturer’s instruments (Sartorius). The condensed supernatant was centrifuged at 25,000 g for 15 min to remove insoluble salts. The cleaned supernatant was further condensed by Amicon Ultra system at a cutoff of 3 kDa (Millipore). The resulting sample with a volume of about 100 μl were mixed with 30 μl of 5× SDS-PAGE Sample buffer and boiled for 5 min. The samples were applied to SDS-PAGE, Western blot or LC-MS/MS analysis.
Western blot
Western blot was carried out according to standard procedures. Briefly, proteins were resolved on 12% SDS-PAGE, transferred to PVDF membranes. 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) with 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% (V/V) Tween-20 (TBST) and 5% skim milk was used for blocking the PVDF membranes and diluting the antibodies. After blocking, membranes were probed with the anti-KatN (rabbit-derived) antibody or anti-RpoA (mouse-derived) antibody or anti-His tag (mouse-derived) antibody over night at 4°C. Membranes were washed with 1× TBST 3 times for 10 min each, and probed with appropriate secondary antibody.
β-Lactamase assay
The β-Lactamase assay was performed as previously described [19], with some modifications. Briefly, EHEC strain EDL933 and its derived mutants bearing pCX340 or pCX-katN were grown overnight in LB medium with 10 μg/ml tetracycline and 0.25 mM IPTG at 37°C. The cultures were centrifuged at 12,000 g for 15 min, and the supernatants were collected. Five microliters of nitrocefin (Calbiochem) stock solution (1 mM) was added to 95 μl supernatant of each sample, then the mixture was incubated at room temperature for up to 15 min to allow red color to develop. Spectrophotometric assays for β-lactamase were carried out by measuring changes in absorbance at 486 nm.
KatN purification
For purification of KatN, pQE80YX1-katN was constructed and verified by sequencing. The plasmid was introduced into E. coli strain BL21 (DE3), and the cells were grown in LB medium containing 100 μg/ml ampicillin at 37°C with shaking. IPTG was added to a final concentration of 0.1 mM at the time point when the absorbance of the culture at OD600 reached 0.6–0.8. The culture was continuously incubated for another 3–4 h. The cells were harvested by centrifugation and disrupted by ultrasonication (Sonics, USA). The supernatant was collected by centrifugation at 20,000 x g for 40 min at 4°C, and supplemented with imidazole at a final concentration of 10 mM. KatN was purified by the ÄKTA system (GE Health, USA). His-tag resin beans were washed with 10× volume binding buffer A (20 mM sodium phosphate, 500 mM NaCl and 20 mM imidazole, pH 7.5), recombinant protein was eluted using 10× volume of buffer B (20 mM sodium phosphate, 500 mM NaCl and 500 mM imidazole, pH 7.5). The protein was checked by SDS-PAGE before shock-frozen storage at -80°C. KatN concentration was determined by the Bradford protein assay (Bio-Rad, USA). Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was used as the protein concentration standard.
KatN antibody preparation
The KatN protein tagged with hexa-histidine (6× His) was overexpressed and purified by nickel affinity chromatography. The purified KatN was used to immunize rabbits for the production of antibodies.
Measurement of KatN catalase activity
Catalase activity was measured by using the Catalase Assay Kit (Beyotime) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The bovine liver catalase (Sigma Aldrich, USA) was used as a positive control.
Resistance to H2O2
The overnight cultures of strain EDL933 and its derived mutants were diluted and transferred into fresh LB medium to reach OD600 value of 1.0. To test the resistance to H2O2, bacteria cultures were diluted 100 times in 5 ml LB broth supplemented with 0 mM, 1 mM, 2 mM, 4 mM, 6 mM or 100 mM H2O2. After incubation at 37°C, 220 rpm for 7 h, the resistance to H2O2 was measured by determining the values of OD600.
Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) assay
Briefly, the total RNA was isolated by RiboPure-Bacteria kit (Ambion, USA), and the concentration was determined by measuring the A260. Three microgram of total RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA by using Super Script III First-Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR (Invitrogen, USA). Primers for qPCR were listed in S4 Table. Samples were run in triplicates and amplified using SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (TAKARA) in the 7500 fast Real-Time PCR System. The relative transcriptional level was determined by the methods of 2−ΔΔCt [73]. 16S rRNA was used as a reference gene.
Bacterial competition assay
Bacterial competition assays were performed according to the method previously described, with minor modifications [33]. The gentamicin-resistant plasmid was transformed into strain EDL933 or P. aeruginosa PAO1 for bacterial competition assays; A. baylyi ADP1 was spontaneous streptomycin resistant mutant, E. coli K12 MG1655 was kanamycin resistant derivative mutant. Overnight cultures of bacteria (EHEC EDL933, P. aeruginosa PAO1 or A. baylyi ADP1) were washed by LB and diluted 100 times into fresh LB broth and cultivated to OD600 ~ 0.8–1.0. Cells were washed by 1× PBS and enriched to OD600 ~ 10. Then, cells were mixed in 20:1 ratio, and 5 μl of the mixture was spotted on LB agar plate. After incubated at 37°C for 2.5 h, bacterial spots were cut out and the cells were resuspended in 1 ml 1× PBS. The suspensions were diluted serially in 1× PBS, and 5 μl of the suspensions was spotted on selective LB agar plates (gentamicin for strain EDL933 and P. aeruginosa PAO1, streptomycin for A. baylyi ADP1), followed by 16 h incubation at 30°C. Antibiotic concentrations were gentamicin, 15 μg/ml; streptomycin, 100 μg/ml; kanamycin, 10 μg/ml. At least three biological replicates were performed.
Bacterial survival in macrophage cells
The RAW264.7 cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) for survival experiment [73,74]. The RAW264.7 cells were seeded at 2×105 cells per well in a 24-well tissue culture plate and cultured at 37°C under 5% of CO2 overnight. Then, the RAW264.7 cells were infected with 5×106 cells of EHEC strain EDL933 and its derived mutants (MOI = 10). The plate was centrifuged briefly (400 g, 5 min) to synchronize the infection and incubated for 30 min (0 h) at 37°C under 5% of CO2. The cells were washed three times with PBS and fresh DMEM-10% FBS containing 100 μg/ml gentamicin was added to kill extracellular bacteria. After incubation for 2 h at 37°C under 5% of CO2, the cells were washed with PBS three times and lysed in 0.025% SDS, and then diluted with PBS for CFU counting on LB agar plates. To assess intracellular growth, the DMEM-10% FBS containing 100 μg/ml gentamicin was replaced with DMEM-10% FBS containing 15 μg/ml gentamicin and parallel cell cultures were analyzed for viable bacteria after 24 h incubation at 37°C under 5% of CO2.
Measurement of intracellular gene expression
The transcription of T6SS genes of EHEC in RAW264.7 cells was analyzed by qPCR. In brief, 2×105 RAW 264.7 cells were infected with 1×107 EHEC strain EDL933 (MOI = 50) at 37°C under 5% of CO2. After incubation for 1 h, excess bacteria were washed off with PBS, and the infected cells were incubated with DMEM (10% FBS) at 37°C under 5% of CO2 for 8 h. The EHEC strain EDL933 was incubated individually with DMEM (10% FBS) at 37°C under 5% of CO2 for 8 h as an uninfected control. After 8 h incubation, the supernatants were removed, and the infected cells were washed three times with PBS. Bacteria were released from infected macrophages by treatment with 1% Triton X-100 for 10 min. The total bacterial RNA was isolated, and the mRNA levels of z0254, z0264, z0266, z0267, katG, katE, katP, ahpC and katN were quantified by qPCR.
The primary peritoneal macrophages isolation
Thioglycolate-elicited primary peritoneal macrophages (Peritoneal MΦ) were harvested as described before [74]. Briefly, BALB/c mice were intraperitoneally injected with 4% Brewer’s thioglycolate medium (Sigma). After 3 days, mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation, and cells were isolated by flushing the peritoneal cavity with 50 ml PBS per mouse. Cells were seeded in 24-well plates, and non-adherent cells were removed by washing with DMEM. The adherent peritoneal macrophages were used for subsequent experiments.
Ethics statement
The animal procedures were approved by Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, and this study was carried out in strict accordance with the National Research Council Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals [SYXK (Shanghai 2007–0025)]. All surgery was performed under sodium pentobarbital anesthesia, and all efforts were made to minimize suffering.
Animal experiments
Five-week-old BALB/c mice were used for all animal infection experiments. Two days before infection, mice (8/group) were gavaged with 200 μl PBS (200 mg/ml streptomycin) to disrupt the microbiota in intestinal track. Mice were not fed 8 h before intragastric inoculation. EHEC strain EDL933 and its derived mutants were grown to exponential phase (OD600 = 1) followed by washing and resuspension at a concentration of 1×1010 CFU in 250 μl of PBS. The body weight and survival of mice were recorded every day from day 0 to day 15 after administration. The extent of bacterial colonization was monitored daily for 8 days by quantitation of the strain EDL933 and its derived mutants shed into fecal pellets. For collecting feces, mice of every group were placed into clean, empty cages, allowed to defecate, and the feces were collected and weighed. The fecal material was diluted 1:10 by weight into sterile PBS then homogenized by vortex. Large debris was pelleted by brief centrifugation at 1,750 g, and the supernatants were diluted and plated onto Sorbitol MacConkey Agar (SMAC) plates to determine CFU/g feces.
Immuno-fluorescence assay
The immune-fluorescence assays were performed as previously described with minor modifications [38]. RAW264.7 cells were grown in a 24-well tissue culture plate on glass cover-slips at 37°C under 5% of CO2. Strain EDL933 and its derived mutants were cultured overnight at 37°C in LB broth. Then, RAW264.7 cells were infected by EDL933 and its mutants (MOI = 10). After incubation for 40 min, the cells were fixed with 4% para-formaldehyde (PFA) in PBS for 30 min at room temperature and then washed three times with PBS. The cells were blocked with 3% BSA-PBS for 30 min at 37°C.
The antibodies were diluted in 3% BSA-PBS at the indicated dilutions: mouse-anti-O157 antibody (1:200); rabbit-anti-KatN antibody (1:6000); goat-anti- mouse FITC conjugate (1:300); goat-anti-rabbit rhodanmine red-X conjugate (1:300). The cover-slips were incubated with anti-O157 and anti-KatN antibodies simultaneously overnight at 4°C. After incubation the cover-slips were washed three times with PBS and were incubated with goat-anti-mouse FITC conjugated and goat-anti-rabbit rhodanmine red-X conjugated antibodies away from light at 37°C for 1 h. Cell nuclei were counterstained with 2.5 μg/ml nuclear stain DAPI for 10 min. The cover-slips were washed three times with PBS and then were mounted on glass slides and sealed with Entellan (Merck). Samples were analyzed using a laser-scanning confocal microscope (Leica TCS-NT) as described previously [13].
HyPer-3 probe-based reactive oxygen species test
The Hyper-3 probe-based reactive oxygen species test were performed as previously described with some modifications [50]. HyPer-3-transfected RAW264.7 cells were plated on glass coverslips (Fisher) overnight at a cell density of 3×105/ml. Cells were washed three times with PBS and then infected with strain EDL933 and its derived mutants (MOI = 10) in DMEM without Phenol Red and FBS at 37°C under 5% of CO2. The uninfected cells were used as a negative control. After incubation for 50 min, the DMEM was removed and cells were washed three times with PBS to remove the extracellular bacteria. Cells were analyzed by a laser-scanning confocal microscope (Leica TCS-NT) at excitation wavelengths of 405 and 488 nm. For every sample, the average 488 nm/405 nm ratios of at least ten cells were analyzed.
Flow cytometry-based reactive oxygen species (ROS) test
The intracellular ROS were estimated using a fluorescent probe DCFH-DA by flow cytometry [51]. Briefly, RAW264.7 cells were grown overnight in a 24-well tissue culture plate at a cell density of 3×105/ml. Cells were washed three times with PBS and then infected with mutant strains (MOI = 10) in DMEM without Phenol Red and FBS at 37°C under 5% of CO2. The uninfected cells were used as a negative control. After incubation for 50 min, the DMEM was removed and cells were washed three times with PBS. DCFH-DA (900 μl, diluted in DMEM without Phenol Red and FBS at a final concentration of 10 μM) was added separately to wells and cells were incubated at 37°C under 5% of CO2 for 45 min. After removing DCFH-DA solution, cells were washed three times with PBS and were suspended in 200 μl PBS with propidium iodide (PI) (5 μg/ml). PI was used as a counter stain dye for DCFH. Cells were analyzed by the flow cytometer FACScan (Becton Dickinson). The mean fluorescence of 10000 PI-negative cells was calculated using the flow cytometer software FlowJo, version 6.4.2 (FlowJo, USA).
TEM-1 translocation assay
The translocation assay was performed as previously described with some modifications [42]. RAW264.7 cells were seeded at 3×104 cells/ml on glass coverslips (Fisher) overnight in minimal essential medium (MEM) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). EHEC strain EDL933 (WT) and ΔT6SS bearing pCX340 or pCX-katN were grown overnight in LB broth with 10 μg/ml tetracycline at 37°C, subcultured 1:100 in LB broth with 10 μg/ml tetracycline and 0.8 mM IPTG, followed by growing at 37°C for 2 h. RAW264.7 cells were washed three times with Hanks’ balanced salt solution (HBSS) and infected with 3×106 bacteria (MOI = 100) in MEM medium containing 1% FBS, 10 μg/ml tetracycline and 0.8 mM IPTG for 3 h. Cells were washed three times with HBSS and then incubated with 2 μM CCF2-AM (Invitrogen) for 60 min. Cells were washed three times with HBSS to remove CCF2-AM and then analyzed by a laser-scanning confocal microscope (Leica TCS-NT) at excitation wavelengths of 409 and 488 nm (X20 magnification).
EHEC interaction with bile salts
EHEC survival in bovine bile salts assay was performed as previously described with modifications [56]. Cells from a single clone were grown overnight in LB broth at 37°C, subcultured 1:100 in 6 ml LB broth. Cells were grown to an OD600 of 0.3, at which time cultures were supplemented with 0 mg/ml, 25 mg/ml or 50 mg/ml bovine bile salts (Sigma Aldrich) and incubated at 37°C. At 0 h, 3 h, and 6 h post-bile salt treatment, samples were collected for OD600 determination and total RNA isolation.
Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics and statistical comparison were performed resourcing to the GraphPad Prism, version 5.00 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Statistical comparison of mean values between two specific groups was carried out using the Student’s t-test, and ANOVA analysis was applied to compare mean values of more than two groups. *, P<0.05; **, P<0.01; ***, P<0.001; ns, Not significant.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Dr. Joseph Mougous at University Washington for providing Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and derived mutants, Dr. Eric Oswald at Université Toulouse III for providing plasmid pCX340. We thank Dr. Jing Yi, Dr. Jie Yang and Dr. Kejia Liu for the assistance in measurement of intracellular ROS, and Dr. Bingshun Wang for his help in statistical analysis at Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31270173, No. 81601738 and No. 81361120383), the State Key Development Programs for Basic Research of China (973 Program No. 2015CB554203), Key Research and Development Project of China (No. 2016YFA0500600), the Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Page AV, Liles WC (2013) Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli Infections and the Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome. Med Clin North Am 97: 681–695, xi. 10.1016/j.mcna.2013.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tilden J Jr., Young W, McNamara AM, Custer C, Boesel B, et al. (1996) A new route of transmission for Escherichia coli: infection from dry fermented salami. Am J Public Health 86: 1142–1145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Poirier K, Faucher SP, Beland M, Brousseau R, Gannon V, et al. (2008) Escherichia coli O157:H7 survives within human macrophages: global gene expression profile and involvement of the Shiga toxins. Infect Immun 76: 4814–4822. 10.1128/IAI.00446-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Shimizu T, Tsutsuki H, Matsumoto A, Nakaya H, Noda M (2012) The nitric oxide reductase of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli plays an important role for the survival within macrophages. Mol Microbiol 85: 492–512. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08122.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fang FC (2004) Antimicrobial reactive oxygen and nitrogen species: concepts and controversies. Nat Rev Microbiol 2: 820–832. 10.1038/nrmicro1004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cabiscol E, Tamarit J, Ros J (2000) Oxidative stress in bacteria and protein damage by reactive oxygen species. Int Microbiol 3: 3–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Imlay JA (2013) The molecular mechanisms and physiological consequences of oxidative stress: lessons from a model bacterium. Nat Rev Microbiol 11: 443–454. 10.1038/nrmicro3032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Imlay JA (2008) Cellular defenses against superoxide and hydrogen peroxide. Annu Rev Biochem 77: 755–776. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.061606.161055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Poole LB (2005) Bacterial defenses against oxidants: mechanistic features of cysteine-based peroxidases and their flavoprotein reductases. Arch Biochem Biophys 433: 240–254. 10.1016/j.abb.2004.09.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tartaglia LA, Storz G, Ames BN (1989) Identification and molecular analysis of oxyR-regulated promoters important for the bacterial adaptation to oxidative stress. J Mol Biol 210: 709–719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Uhlich GA (2009) KatP contributes to OxyR-regulated hydrogen peroxide resistance in Escherichia coli serotype O157: H7. Microbiology 155: 3589–3598. 10.1099/mic.0.031435-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cascales E (2008) The type VI secretion toolkit. EMBO Rep 9: 735–741. 10.1038/embor.2008.131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jani AJ, Cotter PA (2010) Type VI secretion: not just for pathogenesis anymore. Cell Host Microbe 8: 2–6. 10.1016/j.chom.2010.06.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Russell AB, Singh P, Brittnacher M, Bui NK, Hood RD, et al. (2012) A widespread bacterial type VI secretion effector superfamily identified using a heuristic approach. Cell Host Microbe 11: 538–549. 10.1016/j.chom.2012.04.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Schell MA, Ulrich RL, Ribot WJ, Brueggemann EE, Hines HB, et al. (2007) Type VI secretion is a major virulence determinant in Burkholderia mallei. Mol Microbiol 64: 1466–1485. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05734.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dudley EG, Thomson NR, Parkhill J, Morin NP, Nataro JP (2006) Proteomic and microarray characterization of the AggR regulon identifies a pheU pathogenicity island in enteroaggregative Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 61: 1267–1282. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05281.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mougous JD, Cuff ME, Raunser S, Shen A, Zhou M, et al. (2006) A virulence locus of Pseudomonas aeruginosa encodes a protein secretion apparatus. Science 312: 1526–1530. 10.1126/science.1128393 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pukatzki S, Ma AT, Sturtevant D, Krastins B, Sarracino D, et al. (2006) Identification of a conserved bacterial protein secretion system in Vibrio cholerae using the Dictyostelium host model system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 1528–1533. 10.1073/pnas.0510322103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhou Y, Tao J, Yu H, Ni J, Zeng L, et al. (2012) Hcp family proteins secreted via the type VI secretion system coordinately regulate Escherichia coli K1 interaction with human brain microvascular endothelial cells. Infect Immun 80: 1243–1251. 10.1128/IAI.05994-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rosales-Reyes R, Skeldon AM, Aubert DF, Valvano MA (2012) The Type VI secretion system of Burkholderia cenocepacia affects multiple Rho family GTPases disrupting the actin cytoskeleton and the assembly of NADPH oxidase complex in macrophages. Cell Microbiol 14: 255–273. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2011.01716.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Shrivastava S, Mande SS (2008) Identification and functional characterization of gene components of Type VI Secretion system in bacterial genomes. PLoS One 3: e2955 10.1371/journal.pone.0002955 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ma J, Bao Y, Sun M, Dong W, Pan Z, et al. (2014) Two functional type VI secretion systems in avian pathogenic Escherichia coli are involved in different pathogenic pathways. Infect Immun 82: 3867–3879. 10.1128/IAI.01769-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.de Pace F, Boldrin de Paiva J, Nakazato G, Lancellotti M, Sircili MP, et al. (2011) Characterization of IcmF of the type VI secretion system in an avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) strain. Microbiology 157: 2954–2962. 10.1099/mic.0.050005-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.de Pace F, Nakazato G, Pacheco A, de Paiva JB, Sperandio V, et al. (2010) The type VI secretion system plays a role in type 1 fimbria expression and pathogenesis of an avian pathogenic Escherichia coli strain. Infect Immun 78: 4990–4998. 10.1128/IAI.00531-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Li J, Yao Y, Xu HH, Hao L, Deng Z, et al. (2015) SecReT6: a web-based resource for type VI secretion systems found in bacteria. Environ Microbiol 17: 2196–2202. 10.1111/1462-2920.12794 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wan B, Zhang Q, Tao J, Zhou A, Yao YF, et al. (2016) Global transcriptional regulation by H-NS and its biological influence on the virulence of Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. Gene 588: 115–123. 10.1016/j.gene.2016.05.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Salomon D, Klimko JA, Orth K (2014) H-NS regulates the Vibrio parahaemolyticus type VI secretion system 1. Microbiology 160: 1867–1873. 10.1099/mic.0.080028-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zhang J, Xiao J, Zhang Y, Cui S, Liu Q, et al. (2014) A new target for the old regulator: H-NS suppress T6SS secretory protein EvpP, the major virulence factor in the fish pathogen Edwardsiella tarda. Lett Appl Microbiol 59: 557–564. 10.1111/lam.12316 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Brunet YR, Khodr A, Logger L, Aussel L, Mignot T, et al. (2015) H-NS Silencing of the Salmonella Pathogenicity Island 6-Encoded Type VI Secretion System Limits Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Interbacterial Killing. Infect Immun 83: 2738–2750. 10.1128/IAI.00198-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Datsenko KA, Wanner BL (2000) One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 6640–6645. 10.1073/pnas.120163297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bonemann G, Pietrosiuk A, Diemand A, Zentgraf H, Mogk A (2009) Remodelling of VipA/VipB tubules by ClpV-mediated threading is crucial for type VI protein secretion. EMBO J 28: 315–325. 10.1038/emboj.2008.269 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mougous JD, Gifford CA, Ramsdell TL, Mekalanos JJ (2007) Threonine phosphorylation post-translationally regulates protein secretion in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Nat Cell Biol 9: 797–803. 10.1038/ncb1605 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Basler M, Ho BT, Mekalanos JJ (2013) Tit-for-tat: type VI secretion system counterattack during bacterial cell-cell interactions. Cell 152: 884–894. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Phillips AD, Frankel G (2000) Intimin-mediated tissue specificity in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli interaction with human intestinal organ cultures. J Infect Dis 181: 1496–1500. 10.1086/315404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Murdoch SL, Trunk K, English G, Fritsch MJ, Pourkarimi E, et al. (2011) The opportunistic pathogen Serratia marcescens utilizes type VI secretion to target bacterial competitors. J Bacteriol 193: 6057–6069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zheng J, Ho B, Mekalanos JJ (2011) Genetic analysis of anti-amoebae and anti-bacterial activities of the type VI secretion system in Vibrio cholerae. PLoS One 6: e23876 10.1371/journal.pone.0023876 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chou S, Bui NK, Russell AB, Lexa KW, Gardiner TE, et al. (2012) Structure of a peptidoglycan amidase effector targeted to Gram-negative bacteria by the type VI secretion system. Cell Rep 1: 656–664. 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.05.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Husseiny MI, Wartha F, Hensel M (2007) Recombinant vaccines based on translocated effector proteins of Salmonella Pathogenicity Island 2. Vaccine 25: 185–193. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.11.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Dethlefsen L, Huse S, Sogin ML, Relman DA (2008) The pervasive effects of an antibiotic on the human gut microbiota, as revealed by deep 16S rRNA sequencing. PLoS Biol 6: e280 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060280 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Liang X, Moore R, Wilton M, Wong MJ, Lam L, et al. (2015) Identification of divergent type VI secretion effectors using a conserved chaperone domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112: 9106–9111. 10.1073/pnas.1505317112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Robbe-Saule V, Coynault C, Ibanez-Ruiz M, Hermant D, Norel F (2001) Identification of a non-haem catalase in Salmonella and its regulation by RpoS (sigmaS). Mol Microbiol 39: 1533–1545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Charpentier X, Oswald E (2004) Identification of the secretion and translocation domain of the enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli effector Cif, using TEM-1 beta-lactamase as a new fluorescence-based reporter. J Bacteriol 186: 5486–5495. 10.1128/JB.186.16.5486-5495.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ugalde-Silva P, Gonzalez-Lugo O, Navarro-Garcia F (2016) Tight Junction Disruption Induced by Type 3 Secretion System Effectors Injected by Enteropathogenic and Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 6: 87 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Chiang SM, Schellhorn HE (2012) Regulators of oxidative stress response genes in Escherichia coli and their functional conservation in bacteria. Arch Biochem Biophys 525: 161–169. 10.1016/j.abb.2012.02.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Schellhorn HE (1995) Regulation of hydroperoxidase (catalase) expression in Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol Lett 131: 113–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Morgan RW, Christman MF, Jacobson FS, Storz G, Ames BN (1986) Hydrogen peroxide-inducible proteins in Salmonella typhimurium overlap with heat shock and other stress proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 83: 8059–8063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Schellhorn HE, Hassan HM (1988) Transcriptional regulation of katE in Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol 170: 4286–4292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Dong T, Schellhorn HE (2009) Global effect of RpoS on gene expression in pathogenic Escherichia coli O157:H7 strain EDL933. BMC Genomics 10: 349 10.1186/1471-2164-10-349 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Uhlich GA, Chen CY, Cottrell BJ, Irwin PL, Phillips JG (2012) Peroxide resistance in Escherichia coli serotype O157: H7 biofilms is regulated by both RpoS-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Microbiology 158: 2225–2234. 10.1099/mic.0.059535-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Bilan DS, Pase L, Joosen L, Gorokhovatsky AY, Ermakova YG, et al. (2013) HyPer-3: a genetically encoded H(2)O(2) probe with improved performance for ratiometric and fluorescence lifetime imaging. ACS Chem Biol 8: 535–542. 10.1021/cb300625g [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kim JA, Lau EK, Pan L, De Blanco EJ (2010) NF-kappaB inhibitors from Brucea javanica exhibiting intracellular effects on reactive oxygen species. Anticancer Res 30: 3295–3300. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Pezoa D, Yang HJ, Blondel CJ, Santiviago CA, Andrews-Polymenis HL, et al. (2013) The type VI secretion system encoded in SPI-6 plays a role in gastrointestinal colonization and systemic spread of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in the chicken. PLoS One 8: e63917 10.1371/journal.pone.0063917 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Schwarz S, West TE, Boyer F, Chiang WC, Carl MA, et al. (2010) Burkholderia type VI secretion systems have distinct roles in eukaryotic and bacterial cell interactions. PLoS Pathog 6: e1001068 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Filloux A, Hachani A, Bleves S (2008) The bacterial type VI secretion machine: yet another player for protein transport across membranes. Microbiology 154: 1570–1583. 10.1099/mic.0.2008/016840-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ma J, Sun M, Bao Y, Pan Z, Zhang W, et al. (2013) Genetic diversity and features analysis of type VI secretion systems loci in avian pathogenic Escherichia coli by wide genomic scanning. Infect Genet Evol 20: 454–464. 10.1016/j.meegid.2013.09.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Free AL, Duoss HA, Bergeron LV, Shields-Menard SA, Ward E, et al. (2012) Survival of O157:H7 and non-O157 serogroups of Escherichia coli in bovine rumen fluid and bile salts. Foodborne Pathog Dis 9: 1010–1014. 10.1089/fpd.2012.1208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Rao PS, Yamada Y, Tan YP, Leung KY (2004) Use of proteomics to identify novel virulence determinants that are required for Edwardsiella tarda pathogenesis. Mol Microbiol 53: 573–586. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04123.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Zheng J, Leung KY (2007) Dissection of a type VI secretion system in Edwardsiella tarda. Mol Microbiol 66: 1192–1206. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05993.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Miyata ST, Kitaoka M, Brooks TM, McAuley SB, Pukatzki S (2011) Vibrio cholerae requires the type VI secretion system virulence factor VasX to kill Dictyostelium discoideum. Infect Immun 79: 2941–2949. 10.1128/IAI.01266-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Miyata ST, Unterweger D, Rudko SP, Pukatzki S (2013) Dual expression profile of type VI secretion system immunity genes protects pandemic Vibrio cholerae. PLoS Pathog 9: e1003752 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003752 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Jiang F, Waterfield NR, Yang J, Yang G, Jin Q (2014) A Pseudomonas aeruginosa type VI secretion phospholipase D effector targets both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Cell Host Microbe 15: 600–610. 10.1016/j.chom.2014.04.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Aubert DF, Xu H, Yang J, Shi X, Gao W, et al. (2016) A Burkholderia Type VI Effector Deamidates Rho GTPases to Activate the Pyrin Inflammasome and Trigger Inflammation. Cell Host Microbe 19: 664–674. 10.1016/j.chom.2016.04.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Jung IL, Kim IG (2003) Transcription of ahpC, katG, and katE genes in Escherichia coli is regulated by polyamines: polyamine-deficient mutant sensitive to H2O2-induced oxidative damage. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 301: 915–922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Mukhopadhyay S, Schellhorn HE (1994) Induction of Escherichia coli hydroperoxidase I by acetate and other weak acids. J Bacteriol 176: 2300–2307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Seaver LC, Imlay JA (2001) Alkyl hydroperoxide reductase is the primary scavenger of endogenous hydrogen peroxide in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 183: 7173–7181. 10.1128/JB.183.24.7173-7181.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Nathan C, Cunningham-Bussel A (2013) Beyond oxidative stress: an immunologist's guide to reactive oxygen species. Nat Rev Immunol 13: 349–361. 10.1038/nri3423 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Kumar A, Wu H, Collier-Hyams LS, Hansen JM, Li T, et al. (2007) Commensal bacteria modulate cullin-dependent signaling via generation of reactive oxygen species. EMBO J 26: 4457–4466. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601867 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kumar A, Wu H, Collier-Hyams LS, Kwon YM, Hanson JM, et al. (2009) The bacterial fermentation product butyrate influences epithelial signaling via reactive oxygen species-mediated changes in cullin-1 neddylation. J Immunol 182: 538–546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Swanson PA 2nd, Kumar A, Samarin S, Vijay-Kumar M, Kundu K, et al. (2011) Enteric commensal bacteria potentiate epithelial restitution via reactive oxygen species-mediated inactivation of focal adhesion kinase phosphatases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 8803–8808. 10.1073/pnas.1010042108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Wentworth CC, Alam A, Jones RM, Nusrat A, Neish AS (2011) Enteric commensal bacteria induce extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway signaling via formyl peptide receptor-dependent redox modulation of dual specific phosphatase 3. J Biol Chem 286: 38448–38455. 10.1074/jbc.M111.268938 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Jones RM, Luo L, Ardita CS, Richardson AN, Kwon YM, et al. (2013) Symbiotic lactobacilli stimulate gut epithelial proliferation via Nox-mediated generation of reactive oxygen species. EMBO J 32: 3017–3028. 10.1038/emboj.2013.224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Wang H, Chen S, Zhang J, Rothenbacher FP, Jiang T, et al. (2012) Catalases promote resistance of oxidative stress in Vibrio cholerae. PLoS One 7: e53383 10.1371/journal.pone.0053383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Sang Y, Ren J, Ni J, Tao J, Lu J, et al. (2016) Protein Acetylation Is Involved in Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Virulence. J Infect Dis 213: 1836–1845. 10.1093/infdis/jiw028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Ren J, Sang Y, Tan Y, Tao J, Ni J, et al. (2016) Acetylation of Lysine 201 Inhibits the DNA-Binding Ability of PhoP to Regulate Salmonella Virulence. PLoS Pathog 12: e1005458 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005458 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.