Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2017 Mar 24;7:45217. doi: 10.1038/srep45217

Coexistence of superconductivity and charge-density wave in the quasi-one-dimensional material HfTe3

Saleem J Denholme 1,a, Akinori Yukawa 1, Kohei Tsumura 1, Masanori Nagao 2, Ryuji Tamura 3, Satoshi Watauchi 2, Isao Tanaka 2, Hideaki Takayanagi 1, Nobuaki Miyakawa 1,b
PMCID: PMC5364548  PMID: 28338062

Abstract

We present the first experimental evidence for metallicity, superconductivity (SC) and the co-existence of charge density waves (CDW) in the quasi-one-dimensional material HfTe3. The existence of such phenomena is a typical characteristic of the transition metal chalcogenides however, without the application of hydrostatic pressure/chemical doping, it is rare for a material to exhibit the co-existence of both states. Materials such as HfTe3 can therefore provide us with a unique insight into the relationship between these multiple ordered states. By improving on the original synthesis conditions, we have successfully synthesised single phase HfTe3 and confirmed the resultant structure by performing Rietveld refinement. Using low temperature resistivity measurements, we provide the first experimental evidence of SC at ~1.4 K as well as a resistive anomaly indicative of a CDW formation at ~82 K. By the application of hydrostatic-pressure, the resistivity anomaly shifts to higher temperature. The results show that HfTe3 is a promising new material to help study the relationship between SC and CDW.

The coexistence of superconductivity (SC) and charge- and/or spin-density waves (CDW and/or SDW) is fundamental to our understanding behind the mechanism of high-Tc SC and is one of the most significant challenges in condensed matter physics1. CDWs favor low dimensionality2 and materials such as the layered/chain-like transition metal di/trichalcogenides (MQ2/Q3) (where M = groups IV–VI transition metals and Q = sulfur, selenium and tellurium) have been collectively studied for such phenomena3. Examples include TaS34 and NbS35 which exhibit CDWs and TaSe3 which becomes a SC below 2.1 K6. Studies of SC in the MQ2/Q3 family often support a competitive relationship between the SC and CDW states; SC can be induced/enhanced by the suppression of the CDW. This is typically achieved by the application of hydrostatic pressure such as in the case of NbSe27 and NbSe38 or by chemical doping for NaxTaS29 and CuxTiSe210. However, it is rare that the materials without chemical/physical modification exhibit the co-existence of both states. ZrTe3 is a material which shows the coexistence of a CDW at ~63 K and filamentary SC at 2 K11 as does NbSe23. In the case of ZrTe3, by the application of pressure, intercalation of Cu12 and Ni13 or the substitution of Se at the Te site14, the CDW can be suppressed and bulk SC induced at ~5 K15. The electronic structure of ZrTe3 is unique amongst the MQ3 family owing to the strong contribution of the Te-Te pσ* band at the vicinity of the Fermi level16, therefore the inter-chain interactions affects the electronic structure as well as the physical properties. Similar cross-chain interactions are absent in other members of the MQ3 family (when M = group IV transition metal and Q = S/Se)17. Of the MTe3 materials, HfTe3 is the only other material expected theoretically18,19. There are no known reports for TiTe3 nor Nb/TaTe3. However, by using the reaction conditions outlined by Brattås et al. we found that the successful synthesis of HfTe318,19 was irreproducible. Therefore, although theoretical band structure calculations have predicted HfTe3 to be metallic16,20,21 there is currently no experimental confirmation. As far as the authors are aware, the available experimental data for HfTe3 include the original structural characterization18, and the determination of its basic magnetic properties (temperature-independent diamagnetism)19. In addition, it has been recently reported by scanning tunneling spectroscopy that Hf/HfTe5/HfTe3 films exhibited a superconducting gap-like spectra22. HfTe3 and ZrTe3 are iso-structural materials whose features raise the possibility that HfTe3 may also exhibit the coexistence of SC and CDW state. Therefore, it would be an important task to synthesize the high quality bulk compound, and to explore the aforementioned electrical phenomena.

By modifying the original synthesis conditions18,19, polycrystalline HfTe3 samples have been successfully synthesized. The crystal structure has been analyzed using Rietveld refinement and the first experimental evidence of metallicity in this material is reported. The resistivity data exhibits an anomaly suggestive of a CDW formation at ~82 K and subsequently zero resistivity below 2 K. By the application of hydrostatic pressure, the resistivity anomaly shifts to higher temperature. In addition, we note that HfTe3 is highly air-sensitive, where the behaviour of ρ-T characteristics changes from metallic to insulating upon exposure in air (See Supplementary information).

Results and Discussion

Key requirements to synthesise single phase HfTe3

Suitable reaction conditions to produce single phase HfTe3 crucially depend on the maximum reaction temperature19. During this investigation it has been found that a slow cooling rate is also a key requirement. In brief, the favoured phase was HfTe2 at a higher temperature range (≥530 °C) and HfTe5 at lower temperature regions (≤470 °C). As reported by Brattås et al., we confirmed that the sintering condition of c.a. 500 °C indeed favours the growth of the HfTe3 phase18. However, when rapid cooling from 500 °C (e.g. quenching in water) was applied19 the majority phase became HfTe2 together with unreacted tellurium. On the other hand, when slow cooling was performed (approx. −0.25 °C/h) until 470 °C after which the ampoules were cooled to room temperature at a rate of approx. −5 °C/h, then single phase HfTe3 could reproducibly be synthesised. The results suggest that HfTe3 primarily forms by reaction with the tellurium vapour upon cooling. If the reaction vessel is quenched, the solidification of the tellurium prevents its uptake and HfTe2 becomes the preferred phase. Namely, it is found that HfTe3 is the least thermodynamically stable phase within the Te-rich Hf alloys and as a result in order to inhibit the formation of trace amounts of HfTe2/HfTe5, it is necessary to control precisely both the sintering temperature and the cooling rate.

Crystallographic analysis

Figure 1(a) shows the powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) result for HfTe3 together with the result of the Rietveld refinement using ZrSe3 as a reference model23, where the result was consistent with the monoclinic crystal symmetry (space group P21/m). Figure 1(b) represents the crystal structure of HfTe3 which is the pseudo-one-dimensional (1D) structure. As seen in Fig. 1(b), MQ6 trigonal prismatic units propagate along the b-axis resulting in chain-like anisotropic crystal growth. By projection down the b-axis it can be clearly seen how the chains are bonded together by Van der Waals forces (see Fig. 1(c)). Reasonable values of Rwp = 8.47%, Rp = 6.60% and χ2 = 1.544 were obtained. Refined lattice parameters of HfTe3, a = 5.8797(9) Å, b = 3.8999(9) Å, c = 10.0627(3) Å agreed with the previously reported values19. On the other hand, the angle β = 98.38(8)° showed a slight expansion from the originally reported angle of β = 97.98°18. The refinement results are summarized in Table 1. It was confirmed from X-ray fluorescence (XRF) results that the composition ratio of our HfTe3 was Hf:Te = 26:74 (at%).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(a) Rietveld analysis of the PXRD results for HfTe3. (b) Crystal structure of HfTe3 revealing the anisotropic growth preferential along the b-axis. (c) Projection down the b-axis showing more clearly the separation of the chains, where the chains are weakly bonded by the Van der Waals forces. The positions of the three non-equivalent Te atoms are defined as Te(1), Te(2) and Te(3) and bond distances are indicated by b1-b7. The unit cell is indicated by the black lines.

Table 1. Crystallographic data for HfTe3.

Crystal system Monoclinic No. Observations 7500,
Space group P21/m (No. 11) No. parameters 31
a (Å) 5.8797 (9) Rwp 0.0847
b (Å) 3.8999 (9) Rp 0.066
c (Å) 10.0627 (3) Goodness of fit, χ2 1.544
β (°) 98.38 (8) Temperature (K) 295 K
V (Å3) 228.28 (2)    
Z 2    
Hf; 2e (x, 1/4, z) Te(1); 2e (x, 1/4, z)
x 0.2590 (7) x 0.7339 (7)
z 0.6881 (2) z 0.5674 (3)
100 x Uiso (Å2)* 0.484 100 x Uiso (Å2) 0.484
Occ 1 Occ 1
Te(2); 2e (x, 1/4, z) Te(3); 2e (x, 1/4, z)
x 0.4173 (7) x 0.9058 (6)
z 0.1625 (9) z 0.1638 (3)
100 x Uiso (Å2)* 0.484 100 x Uiso (Å2)* 0.484
Occ 1 Occ 1
Selected bond lengths (Hf-Te) (Å) Selected bond lengths (Te-Te) (Å)
Hf - Te(1) x2 (b1)† 3.074 (6) Te(2) - Te(3) x1 (b6)† 2.870 (13)
Hf - Te(1) x1 (b2)† 3.106 (8) Te(2) - Te(3) x1 (b7)† 3.010 (13)
Hf - Te(1) x1 (b3)† 3.106 (6)    
Hf - Te(2) x2 (b4)† 3.062 (7)
Hf - Te(3) x2 (b5)† 2.843 (6)
Open in a new tab

*Isotropic displacement factors were constrained during refinement. †Refer to Fig. 1(c).

Coexistence of SC and CDW

Resistivity of non-air-exposed HfTe3 reproducibly exhibited metallic behaviour in the temperature range between 0.3 and 300 K as shown in Fig. 2(a). The residual resistivity ratio (RRR) defined as ρ(275 K)/ρ(4 K) is ~2.4, which is lower than that of single crystal ZrTe311 but is larger than that of polycrystalline-ZrTe324, in which the lower RRR value is thought to arise from strong grain boundary effects. Therefore the influence of grain boundaries is likely to play a role in the reduction of RRR. The inset of Fig. 2(a) shows the temperature derivative of the resistivity dρ/dT and reveals a resistivity anomaly at 82 K assumed to be indicative of a CDW formation, where the CDW formation temperature TCDW is defined as the temperature at which dρ/dT exhibits a minimum. At TCDW the CDW gap is developed and the resistance anomaly appears owing to a reduction in the density of states at EF due to the CDW formation. Below 2 K, the resistivity showed a sharp drop exhibiting a SC transition at 1.8 K (Tc onset) and reached zero (Tczero) at 1.45 K as can be clearly seen in Fig. 2(b). By increasing the applied current, a broadening of the SC transition was observed and it was accompanied by a downward shift in Tconset and Tczero, whereas the normal state resistivity remains unchanged. The result suggests a weakening in the SC state as well as a decoupling of the Josephson junctions between individual SC grains of the polycrystalline material. I–V characteristics measured at T > Tc and T < Tc revealed ohmic and non-ohmic behaviour, respectively. N.B. In the present study, we observe that HfTe3 shows a rapid weakening of its metallic state within minutes of exposure in air (see Supplementary Fig. S1). This is likely the result of an insulating layer (such as tellurium oxides) forming around the individual grains of the polycrystalline material. The results emphasize that if one is to observe the intrinsic properties of HfTe3 any measurements must be conducted in the absence of air.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a) Temperature dependence of the resistivity for HfTe3. Data show a hump-like feature at ~80 K together with and SC-like transition at 1.8 K. Inset shows that the resistivity anomaly occurs at approximately 82 K (sample #A). (b) Current dependency of the resistivity of HfTe3 below 3 K. Tconset is approximately 1.8 K and Tczero is reached c.a. 1.4 K for a current of 0.05 mA. By an increase in current, both the Tconset and Tczero show a shift to lower temperatures (sample #B).

Behaviour under high-pressure

By the application of hydrostatic pressure (P), the resistivity anomaly gradually shifted to higher temperatures up to ~99 K for P approaching 1 GPa as shown in Fig. 3. Similar behaviour has been reported for ZrTe3 where in the case of an application of P ≤ 2 GPa the TCDW was increased and the SC suppressed. At P ≥ 5 GPa the CDW was fully quenched and gave way to reemergent SC, where Tc increased to ~4.5 K when P~11 GPa15. In addition, in the case of HfTe5, SC appeared by applying P~5 GPa and a maximum Tc of 4.8 K was attained by applying at P~20 GPa25. This suggests the possibility that HfTe3 is likely to follow the same pattern as other members of the group IV-MTex alloys. Namely by further application in pressure, it is expected that the TCDW will eventually be suppressed and Tc will be enhanced.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(a) Pressure dependence of resistivity at the range of P = 0–1 GPa. (b) dρ/dT in the range of 30–150 K as a function of pressure. The minimum of the dip structure shows a shift to higher T with increasing P. Color coding between (a and b) are matched to indicate the same pressure values (sample #D).

Electronic structure

Studies regarding the electronic structure of HfTe3 are limited, but the issue is briefly reported by Felser et al. who determined an electronic structure similar to that of ZrTe3, i.e. a metallic state resulting from a large contribution of the Te p-bands at the Fermi level16. These characteristics are supported by later density of states (DOS) calculations20,21. ZrTe3 exhibits a multi-component Fermi surface with contributions from the Te forming quasi 1D electronic sheets at the boundary of the Brillion zone and from the Zr a 3D-hole character sheet around the Г point. The resultant nesting characteristics at the Fermi surface have been determined to be responsible for the CDW formation in ZrTe316,26,27,28. If one considers the iso-structural/electronic relationship between HfTe3 and ZrTe3, it is likely that similar interchain interactions between neighbouring Te(2) and Te(3) atoms (see Fig. 1(c)) play a dominant role in the metallicity of HfTe316 which in turn would give rise to the similar Fermi surface with nesting features reported for ZrTe3. However, it cannot be categorically asserted that the observed resistivity anomaly is due to a CDW formation from our results only. As in the case of ZrTe3, it would be necessary to confirm any coincidental low-temperature lattice distortions29 as well as to observe the features of the Fermi surface around the temperature of the anomaly26. However the similarities between HfTe3 and ZrTe3 in the electronic structure as well as the results of the temperature/pressure dependence of ρ are strong indication that the observed resistivity anomaly for HfTe3 is indeed the result of a CDW formation.

Conclusion

In summary, we have established a reproducible synthesis method for high-quality polycrystalline HfTe3 and showed that it is an acutely air-sensitive material. By using high-quality HfTe3 we found that the quasi-1D HfTe3 is a novel SC with Tc ~ 1.4 K, and the SC state coexists with the CDW state which appears at TCDW~ 82 K. Furthermore, we provided the first accurate crystallographic data by Rietveld refinement of the PXRD of HfTe3.

Methods

Single-phase polycrystalline HfTe3 samples have been prepared using standard chemical vapour transport techniques. Ground mixtures of a 1:3 molar ratio of powdered Hf and Te were sealed in silica ampoules under a vacuum of c.a. 3 mTorr using a rotary pump. The ampoules were heated in a box furnace using the reaction procedure described in the results and discussion. To prevent exposure to air, all sample preparation was conducted in an argon filled glovebox.

PXRD was carried out using a Rigaku Smartlab diffractometer in flat plate geometry with a Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54056 Å). Diffraction data were typically collected for 5° ≤ 2θ ≤ 80° with a 0.01° step size with scan times of 3 hours. Rietveld refinement was performed using the GSAS software package via the EXPGUI interface30,31. XRF analysis was performed using a JEOL JSX 1000 S ElementEye.

Resistivity measurements were performed on cold-pressed pellets using a standard four-terminal setup. Measurements for sample #A were performed between 0.3 and 300 K using an Oxford Instruments 3He cryostat, data were collected by an AC method using a low-noise amplifier and two lock-in amplifiers. Measurements for sample #B were performed by a DC method between 0.3 K and 15 K using a Quantum Design PPMS equipped with an adiabatic demagnetization refrigerator. The resistivity for Samples #C and #D were also measured by a DC method between 2 and 300 K using a closed cycle helium refrigerator. High-pressure resistivity measurements (up to 1 GPa) were performed using a BeCu/NiCrAl clamped piston-cylinder cell using Daphne 7373 as the fluid pressure transmitting medium with Pb employed as a manometer.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Denholme, S. J. et al. Coexistence of superconductivity and charge-density wave in the quasi-one-dimensional material HfTe3. Sci. Rep. 7, 45217; doi: 10.1038/srep45217 (2017).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep45217-s1.pdf (675.4KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Akikuni Tomonaga, Keita Miyake and Kensuke Yoshinaga, for their assistance in completing the sample analysis.

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Author Contributions S.J.D. and N.M. designed, performed the experiments and analysed the experimental data and wrote the manuscript. A.Y. helped with the sample synthesis. K.T., M.N., S.W., I.T. and H.T. helped collect the low temperature resistivity data at T < 2 K. R.T. helped collect the XRF data.

References

  1. Gabovich A. M., Voitenko A. I. & Ausloos M. Charge- and spin-density waves in existing superconductors: competition between cooper pairing and peirels or excitonic instabilities. Phys. Rep. 367, 583–709 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  2. Grüner G. The dynamics of charge-density waves. Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 1129–1178 (1988). [Google Scholar]
  3. Wilson J. A., Di Salvo F. J. & Mahajan S. Charge-density waves and superlattices in the metallic layered transition metal dichalcogenides. Adv. Phys. 24, 117–201 (1975). [Google Scholar]
  4. Ido M., Tsutsumi K., Sambongi T. & Mori N. Pressure dependence of the metal-semiconductor transition in TaS3. Solid State Comm. 29, 399–402 (1979). [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang Z. et al. Charge-density-wave transport above room temperature in a polytype of NbS3. Phys. Rev. B. 40, 11589 (1989). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Yamamoto M. Superconducting properties of TaSe3. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 45, 431–438 (1978). [Google Scholar]
  7. Suderow H., Tissen V. G., Brison J. P., Martínez J. C. & Viera S. Pressure induced effects on the fermi surface of superconducting 2H-NbSe2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 117006 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Núñez Reguerio M., Mignot J. M. & Castello D. Superconductivity at high pressure in NbSe3. Europhys. Lett. 18, 53–57 (1992). [Google Scholar]
  9. Fang L. et al. Fabrication and superconductivity of NaxTaS2 crystals. Phys. Rev. B. 72, 014534 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  10. Morosan E. et al. Superconductivity in CuxTiSe2. Nature Phys. 2, 544–550 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  11. Takahashi S., Sambongi T., Brill J. W. & Roark W. Transport and elastic anomalies in ZrTe3. Solid State Comm. 49, 1031–1033 (1984). [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhu X., Lei H. & Petrovic C. Coexistence of bulk superconductivity and charge density wave in CuxZrTe3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 246404 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lei H., Zhu X. & Petrovic C. Raising Tc in charge density wave superconductor ZrTe3 by Ni intercalation. EPL. 95, 17011 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhu X. et al. Superconductivity and charge density wave in ZrTe3-xSex. Sci. Rep. 6, 26974 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Yomo R., Yamaya K., Abliz N., Hedo M. & Uwatoko Y. Pressure effect on competition between charge density wave and superconductivity in ZrTe3: appearance of pressure-induced reentrant superconductivity. Phys. Rev. B. 71, 132508 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  16. Felser C., Finckh E. W., Kleinke F., Rocker F. & Tremel W. Electronic properties of ZrTe3. J. Mater. Chem. 8, 1787–1798 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  17. Srivastava S. K. & Avasthi B. N. Preparation, structure and properties of transition metal trichalcogenides. J. Mater. Sci. 27, 3693–3705 (1992). [Google Scholar]
  18. Brattås L. & Kjekshus A. The non-metal rich region of the Hf-Te system. Acta Chem. Scand. 25, 2783–2784 (1971). [Google Scholar]
  19. Brattås L. & Kjekshus A. On the properties of compounds with the ZrTe3 type structure. Acta Chem. Scand. 26, 3441–3449 (1972). [Google Scholar]
  20. Abdulsalam M. & Joubert D. P. Structural and electronic properties of MX3 (M = Ti, Zr and Hf; =S, Se, Te) from first principles calculations. Eur. Phys. J. B. 88, 177 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  21. Li M., Dai J. & Cheng-Zeng X. Tuning the electronic properties of transition-metal trichalcogenides via tensile strain. Nanoscale 7, 15385–15391 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wang Y. et al. Spontaneous formation of a superconductor-topological insulator-normal metal layered heterostructure. Adv. Mater. 28, 5013–5017 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Furuseth S., Brattås L. & Kjekshus A. On the crystal structures of TiS3, ZrS3, ZrSe3, ZrTe3, HfS3 and HfSe3. Acta Chem. Scand. 29, 623–631 (1975). [Google Scholar]
  24. Yadav C. S. & Paulose P. L. Superconductivity at 5.2 K in ZrTe3 polycrystals and the effect of Cu and Ag intercalation. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 24, 235702 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Qi Y. et al. Pressure-driven superconductivity in the transition-metal pentatelluride HfTe5. Phys. Rev. B. 94, 054517 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  26. Kubo Y. et al. Electron momentum density in the low dimensional layered system ZrTe3. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 76, 064711 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  27. Stöwe K. & Wagner F. R. Crystal structure and calculated electronic band structure of ZrTe3. J. Solid State Chem. 138, 160–168 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  28. Hoesch M. et al. Splitting in the fermi surface of ZrTe3: a surface charge density wave system. Phys. Rev. B. 80, 075423 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  29. Eaglesham D. J., Steeds J. W. & Wilson J. A. Electron microscope study of superlattices in ZrTe3. J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 17, L697–L698 (1984). [Google Scholar]
  30. Larson A. C. & von Dreele R. B. The General Structure Analysis system. Los Alamos National Laboratories, Los Alamos, NM (2000). [Google Scholar]
  31. Toby B. H. EXPGUI, a graphical user interface for GSAS. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 34, 210–213 (2001). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep45217-s1.pdf (675.4KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES