Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Phys Chem Lett. 2016 Dec 9;8(1):29–34. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b02304

Segmental Deuteration of α-Synuclein for Neutron Reflectometry on Tethered Bilayers

Zhiping Jiang , Frank Heinrich , Ryan P McGlinchey , James M Gruschus , Jennifer C Lee †,*
PMCID: PMC5367044  NIHMSID: NIHMS850378  PMID: 27936328

Abstract

Neutron reflectometry (NR) is uniquely suited for studying protein interaction with phospholipid bilayers along the bilayer normal on an Ångstrom scale. However, NR on its own cannot discern specific membrane-bound regions due to a lack of scattering contrast within a protein. Here, we report the successful coupling of native chemical ligation (NCL) and NR to study α-synuclein (α-syn), a membrane-binding neuronal protein central in Parkinson’s disease. Two α-syn variants were generated where either the first 86 or last 54 residues are deuterated, allowing for region-specific contrast within the protein and the identification of membrane interacting residues by NR. Residues 1–86 are positioned at the hydrocarbon/headgroup interface of the outer leaflet whereas the density distribution of the 54 C-terminal residues ranges from the hydrocarbon region to the aqueous environment. Coupling of NCL and NR should have broad utility in studies of membrane protein folding.

Keywords: native chemical ligation, nuclear magnetic resonance, circular dichroism, protein-lipid interaction

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name nihms-850378-f0001.jpg


While neutron reflectometry (NR) is a widely used scattering technique to characterize interfacial thin film properties,1-2 its utility in membrane protein structure and biophysics is only developing. NR measurements are uniquely suited to evaluate the architecture of membrane proteins on lipid membrane bilayers and are able to provide information that is not available by other techniques. Using NR, the protein position and distribution profile normal to the membrane surface as well as the bilayer thickness changes upon protein binding can be measured on the Ångstroms scale.3-4 Due to continued improvements in modeling approaches,5 NR has been successfully applied to both peripheral and integral membrane proteins6-14 and even protein complexes.15-16

The scattering length of neutron varies greatly between the isotopes of hydrogen, protium (1H) and deuterium (2H), with a much greater coherent scattering cross section for 2H.17 Thus, deuteration of the protein of interest enhances contrast against the lipid bilayer membrane in an NR experiment.3 However, protein perdeuteration does not provide spatial resolution of specific residues within the bilayer. The ability to assign specific polypeptide region within a protein distribution has yet to be realized by NR.

Here, through the coupling of native chemical ligation (NCL), we overcame this limitation in NR. This combined method allowed us to determine the location of membrane-bound residues within a sparsely tethered bilayer lipid membranes (stBLM)18 for α-synuclein (α-syn), a membrane-binding neuronal protein central to the etiology of Parkinson’s disease (PD). The ligation of uniformly deuterated portion (1–86 or 87–140) to the respective protiated segment (87–140 or 1–86) allowed for scattering contrast within the full length α-syn. α-Syn serves an excellent example because its membrane interaction has been intimately associated with its biological and pathological function and elucidating its membrane interaction is crucial in understanding the cause of PD.19-21

NCL has been used in site-specific and isotopic labelling22-23 of proteins as well as installing posttranslational modifications.24-27 The previously reported NCL constructs of α-syn, utilizing a short synthetic peptide (6–34 amino acids) and a larger fragment,22, 24-28 are not ideal for α-syn-membrane studies because the membrane binding region of α-syn encompasses the first 100 residues. Therefore, we created a new α-syn construct using recombinant protein fragments expressed from E. coli, which is advantageous by lowering cost and increasing yield. An NCL reaction requires an N-terminal Cys residue and a C-terminal thioester. Since α-syn has no native cysteine residues, site-directed mutagenesis was needed. To minimize change, Ser sites were considered and, out of the four native sites (9, 42, 87, 129), Ser87 was chosen to yield suitable peptide fragments (1–86 and 87–140) for E. coli expression with the 1–86 portion containing most of the lipid binding residues. Scheme 1 shows the NCL reaction of the segmentally deuterated α-syn. To avoid the spontaneous mutation Y136C in E. coli,29 a silent codon change (TAC to TAT) was made at position 136. The deuterated portion was also uniformly labelled with 15N for nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) studies and hereafter denoted as 2H15N and the protiated portion is denoted as 1H14N. Experimental details regarding expression, purification, and ligation are provided in the Supporting Information. From a 1-L deuterated cell growth, the yield of ligated α-syn was 3–5 mg.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Segmental deuteratation of α-syn. The N-terminus (Syn1–86) and C-terminus (S87C–140) were expressed either in D2O- or H2O-based media. The N-terminus construct contains a C-terminal Intein and Chitin binding domain (CBD). The C-terminus construct has an N-terminal Cys mutation. The purified N- and C-termini were chemically ligated to produce segmentally deuterated α-syn.

α-Syn membrane binding properties have been investigated by various biophysical techniques,30-37 including NR.6-8 Upon binding to membranes, the N-terminal 100 residues form an amphipathic α-helix leaving the acidic C-terminal 40 residues unstructured and flexible in solution.32, 38-40 α-Syn has a preference for negatively charged membranes due to the electrostatic attraction from multiple lysine residues found in the N-terminal region and the binding affinity is also modulated by the specific anionic phospholipid headgroup.41 For this work, we chose an lipid composition of equimolar 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-3-glycero-phosphocholine and 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-3-glycero-phosphate (noted as PC/PA) because PC is the most abundant mammalian phospholipid, PA is the most strongly bound anionic lipid by α-syn,30 and PC/PA has been well studied in our lab.6-7, 35 Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy, which is highly sensitive to the presence of α-helical structure,30, 35 was used to confirm membrane binding by the segmentally deuterated α-syn. CD titrations were performed with PC/PA lipid vesicles made by extrusion (average diameter ~ 90 nm). Extruded vesicles were employed because they have lower curvature and exhibit similar properties (e.g. comparable diffusion rate and defect density) to that of stBLM for NR experiments.42 Figure 1A inset shows representative data for ligated α-syn with N-terminal deuteration (2H15N(Syn1–86)-1H14N(S87C–140)), where upon adding PC/PA vesicles, characteristic features for α-helical conformation develop. An isodichroic point at 202 nm indicates a two-state transition. Nearly identical binding profiles were observed for the isotopically-labeled ligated variants compared to the WT protein, indicating similar membrane-binding affinities (Figure 1A).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Binding of segmentally deuterated α-syn to equimolar PC/PA vesicles probed by CD and NMR spectroscopy. (A) Mean residue ellipticity at 222 nm ([Θ]222nm) is plotted against lipid-to-protein molar ratio (L/P) for fully protiated α-syn (1H14N(1-140), gray), ligated N-terminal (2H15N(Syn1–86)-1H14N(S87C–140), blue), and C-terminal (1H14N(Syn1–86)-2H15N(S87C–140), green) deuterated α-syn. The peptide portion containing isotopic labeling is colored red in the legend text. Inset: Representative CD titration of 5 μM 2H15N(Syn1–86)-1H14N(87–140) with increasing PC/PA vesicles (0–to–3 mM, red-to-purple). (B) Comparison of HSQC intensity profiles of fully deuterated 2H15N(1-140) α-syn (red), 2H15N(Syn1–86)-1H14N(S87C–140) (blue), and 1H14N(Syn1–86)-2H15N(S87C–140) (green). Vesicles were made through extrusion (50 nm pore size) and measurements were taken at 25 and 15 °C for CD and NMR, respectively.

In addition to CD spectroscopy, 1H/15N HSQC solution NMR spectra were acquired to examine the segmentally deuterated portions of α-syn which were also 15N-labeled. As expected, the HSQC spectra for the ligated variants showed small perturbations around residue 87 due to the Cys mutation compared to fully deuterated α-syn (Figure S1). The backbone amide (15N) resonance intensity (I) in the presence of low (L/P = 3) and high (L/P = 300) concentrations of lipids was normalized to the intensity in the absence of lipids (I0), and results are shown in Figure 1B. As α-syn associates with the slowly tumbling PC/PA vesicles, the NMR resonances of the vesicle-bound residues decrease in intensity, becoming undetectable.40 The normalized 15N intensity profiles are the same within error for deuterated full-length (red) and ligated N- (blue) and C-terminal (green) deuterated samples. At L/P = 3, minimal binding was observed whereas at L/P = 300 the backbone amide intensity was reduced significantly for residues 1–100, and additional interaction was observed for residues 100 to 120, in accord with previous work.39-40 Thus, both CD and NMR data support that segmental deuteration of α-syn does not change its membrane binding affinity and interacting residues.

NR measurements were performed on stBLM composed of equimolar PC/PA prepared by a vesicle fusion method,7 where extruded vesicles were first adsorbed onto the self-assembled monolayer of tether molecules and then stBLM formation is induced by vesicle rupture and fusion through a rapid change of buffer osmolality (see SI for more details). To obtain the greatest contrast between phospholipids and membrane-bound residues, we first examined the ligated N-terminal deuterated α-syn. Representative reflectivity curves collected in the absence and presence of ligated N-terminal deuterated α-syn with two buffer contrasts from multiple measurements are shown in Figure 2A (top panel). Significant differences are observed in the Fresnel normalized reflectivity curves (ΔR/RF) upon the addition of ligated N-terminal deuterated α-syn up to 10 standard deviations (σ) at low momentum transfer Qz values ≤ 0.15 Å−1 (lower panel in Figure 2A). Fitting the reflectivity curve with a monotonic Hermite spline yields the cross section area distribution (volume occupancy) normal to the membrane and hence, the membrane-associated protein density profile. Figure 2B shows the simplified molecular distributions for each interfacial layer of the stBLM obtained from the best global fit of all four reflectivity data. Consistent with previous NR results on full length α-syn,6-7 this profile shows that the majority of the protein resides in the outer leaflet with some penetration into the hydrocarbon region of the bilayer. See Table S1 for all fit parameters.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Ligated N-terminal deuterated α-syn membrane binding probed by NR. (A) Top panel shows neutron reflectivity (R/RF) for equimolar PC/PA stBLM in the absence and presence of ligated α-syn with N-terminal deuteration (2 μM) in H2O (blue) and D2O (green) buffer (pH 7.0). Reflectivity curves in H2O buffer are offset by 5 units for presentation clarity, marked as offset + 5. Error bars represent 68% confidence intervals for the measured reflectivity based on Poisson statistics. Lower panel shows the differences between reflectivity curves (ΔR/RF) plotted in units normalized to the S.D. value (σ) of the experimental error. (B) Simplified molecular distributions for each interfacial layer of the PC/PA stBLM and ligated N-terminal deuterated α-syn. Median protein envelope is shown with 68% confidence interval (dark dashed lines). From left to right: gold (yellow), tether (brown), first layer lipid headgroups (cyan), first layer hydrocarbons (blue), second layer hydrocarbons (blue), and second layer lipid headgroups (cyan). Data for the Si substrate and the SiOx, Cr, and Au layer are partially omitted for simplicity.

Because of segmental deuteration, the protein distribution (Figure 3A) can be separated into the deuterated (residues 1–86, red) and protiated (residues 87–140, blue) portions (Figure 3B). As expected, the membrane binding residues 1–86 have a relatively narrow distribution with a maximum around the hydrocarbon-headgroup interface of the outer leaflet with negligible distribution in the bulk. In contrast, the density distribution of the 54-residue C-terminus is diffuse and ranges from the hydrocarbon region and up to about 60 Å into the bulk solvent. The presence of the protiated density in the bilayer could be due to binding of residues 87 to 100 and even possibly extending to residue 120.40 There is greater uncertainty associated with the protiated portion due to its low volume occupancy of < 2% at any given distance from the membrane. In addition to the protein distribution profile, NR is also able to provide membrane information including thickness change upon protein binding. With addition of ligated N-terminal deuterated α-syn, a small membrane thickening was detected (Table S1). Previous studies have shown that α-syn can induce small to moderate bilayer thinning or thickening.6-7 An explanation of this variability has to await a comprehensive study on the effects of protein surface coverage, solution pH, and bilayer preparation.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Distribution profile for ligated α-syn with equimolar PC/PA stBLM measured by NR. (A) The median protein envelope (solid line) for ligated N-terminal deuterated α-syn (2H15N(Syn1–86)-1H14N(S87C–140) obtained from the best fit of reflectivity data to the spline fit model is shown. The schematic drawing of lipid bilayer is shown on the top. (B) The deconvoluted individual distributions from (A) for the deuterated residues 1–86 and protiated residues 87–140 are shown in red and blue, respectively. For comparison, median protein envelopes (solid lines) for a C-terminal truncated Δ87–140 (2H15N(Syn1–86)) α-syn (C) and ligated C-terminal deuterated α-syn (1H14N(Syn1–86)-2H15N(S87C–140) (D) are shown. (E) The deconvoluted individual distributions from (D) for the protiated residues 1–86 and deuterated residues 87–140 are shown in blue and red, respectively. In all figures, the corresponding dashed lines represent 68% confidence intervals. Volume occupancy is indicated on the right axis. For ease of comparison, the green dashed line indicates the center of the bilayer. See Table S1 for all fit parameters.

To validate our assignment of membrane-interaction residues, NR measurements were performed on (1) the unligated deuterated N-terminal peptide (Syn1–86) and (2) the reverse segmentally deuterated α-syn construct (i.e. deuterated C-terminus with a protiated N-terminus, 1H14N(Syn1–86)-2H15N(S87C–140)). The reflectivity curves were collected (Figures S2 and S3) and the resulting membrane-associated protein density profiles are shown in Figures 3C–E. It is evident that the deuterated truncated Syn1–86 (Figure 3C) agrees well with the 2H15N(Syn1–86) region of the segmentally deuterated α-syn (Figure 3B, red curve). The ligated C-terminal deuterated α-syn shows a smaller volume occupancy compared to that of N-terminal deuterated variant (~4 vs. 6%), which results in greater uncertainty of the profile. The distribution profile is consistent to that obtained from the N-terminal deuterated protein. Colocalization of the C- and N-terminal regions is observed within the outer leaflet of the bilayer, albeit more prominently for the C-terminal deuterated protein (Figure 3E). For the two distributions, the amount of surface-associated protein is very close (~3 Å32) and so is the fraction of protein on the membrane (~64% including both hydrocarbon and headgroup regions). While the profile of ligated C-terminal deuterated α-syn shows more insertion into the hydrocarbon region of the bilayer as indicated by the peak position at the membrane region compared to that of N-terminal deuterated form (5 vs. 13 Å from the bilayer center (Figures 3A and D)), they are within error. Further, it is not feasible to directly compare their exact penetration depths as variations have been observed from individually prepared bilayers. Thus, we consider the overall profiles of the two ligated α-syn as quite similar to each other with most of the protein penetrating into the bilayer, while some protein density is observed in the bulk surrounding.

For completeness, we also examined the deuterated full-length WT (Figure S4) and unexpectedly, we did not find any protein density in the proximal bulk solvent (> 40 Å from bilayer center, Figure S4B) as we previously found for the protiated full length protein at pH 7.46 but instead, it is similar to deuterated truncated Syn1–86 (Figure 3C) and previously reported deuterated full length protein bound to PC/PA at pH 5.5.7 In comparison to the segmentally deuterated samples, fully deuterated WT shows similar occupancy at the hydrocarbon region of the bilayer, but its protein density is moved from the bulk solvent into the headgroup region (Table S1), which implies that the C-terminal portion is residing much closer to the water/membrane interface. However, the differences between fully and segmentally deuterated α-syn were not observed by either CD or NMR spectroscopy. It is possible that the changes revealed by NR are too subtle to be detected by CD and NMR spectroscopy as these methods inform on protein structure and not sensitive to the context of relative bilayer position. However, with the current uncertainties and state of the technique, the density for the C-terminal portion for either ligated variants is not resolved with high enough confidence.

In summary, by using segmentally deuterated α-syn, we have for the first time identified region-specific protein-membrane interaction by NR. Our NR results reaffirm that NR is sensitive and well-suited for structural studies of membrane-associating proteins at the lipid/water interface. NR is not only excellent in obtaining protein structural information along the z-direction, normal to the membrane interface, but by integrating the strategy of NCL, we believe that this will start an exciting new chapter on the applications of NR. We envision the ability to define both region-specific protein-lipid and intermolecular protein-protein interactions on a membrane surface. Further, while the method of NCL has existed, it is not widely used because of the cost of peptide synthesis and inability to produce sufficient material for biophysical studies. Thus, our detailed method to produce proteins by NCL with mg yields is highly desirable not only for α-syn and NR, but also applies to other intrinsically disordered proteins and techniques such as Raman, FTIR, and NMR spectroscopy.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work is supported by the Intramural Research Program at the NIH, NHLBI and by the NIST IMS program “Precision Measurements for Integral Membrane Proteins”. NR was performed on the NG-7 reflectometer at the NIST Neutron Center for Neutron Research and the NIST Center for Nanoscale Science and Technology. Parts of this research were performed at the NHLBI Biophysics (CD and DLS) and Biochemistry (ES-MS) Cores. We thank Nico Tjandra for the use of 800 MHz Bruker spectrometer. Certain commercial materials, equipment, and instruments are identified in this work to describe the experimental procedure as completely as possible. In no case does such an identification imply a recommendation or endorsement by NIST, nor does it imply that the materials, equipment, or instrument identified are necessarily the best available for the purpose.

Footnotes

Supporting Information

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI:10.1021/acs.jpclett.XXXXXXX.

Materials and methods, including expression and purification of chemically ligated α-syn, CD and NMR spectroscopy measurements, experimental details and analysis of neutron experiments, Table S1 with all NR fit parameters, and Figures S1–S4.

Notes

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Penfold J, Thomas RK. The Application of the Specular Reflection of Neutrons to the Study of Surfaces and Interfaces. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 1990;2:1369–1412. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fragneto-Cusani G. Neutron Reflectivity at the Solid/Liquid Interface: Examples of Applications in Biophysics. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2001;13:4973–4989. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Heinrich F. Deuteration in Biological Neutron Reflectometry. Methods Enzymol. 2015;566:211–230. doi: 10.1016/bs.mie.2015.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Clifton LA, N. C, Lakey JH. Examining Protein-Lipid Complexes Using Neutron Scattering. Methods Mol. Biol. 2013;974:119–150. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-275-9_7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Heinrich F, Losche M. Zooming in on Disordered Systems: Neutron Reflection Studies of Proteins Associated with Fluid Membranes. BBA-Biomembranes. 2014;1838:2341–2349. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2014.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pfefferkorn CM, Heinrich F, Sodt AJ, Maltsev AS, Pastor RW, Lee JC. Depth of a-Synuclein in a Bilayer Determined by Fluorescence, Neutron Reflectometry, and Computation. Biophys. J. 2012;102:613–621. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.12.051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jiang Z, Hess SK, Heinrich F, Lee JC. Molecular Details of a-Synuclein Membrane Association Revealed by Neutrons and Photons. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2015;119:4812–4823. doi: 10.1021/jp512499r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hellstrand E, Grey M, Ainalem M-L, Ankner J, Forsyth VT, Fragneto G, Haertlein M, Dauvergne M-T, Nilsson H, Brundin P, et al. Adsorption of a-Synuclein to Supported Lipid Bilayers: Positioning and Role of Electrostatics. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2013;4:1339–1351. doi: 10.1021/cn400066t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Junghans A, Watkins EB, Majewski J, Miranker A, Stroe I. Influence of the Human and Rat Islet Amyloid Polypeptides on Structure of Phospholipid Bilayers: Neutron Reflectometry and Fluorescence Microscopy Studies. Langmuir. 2016;32:4382–4391. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b00825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Heinrich F, Nanda H, Goh HZ, Bachert C, Loesche M, Linstedt AD. Myristoylation Restricts Orientation of the GRASP Domain on Membranes and Promotes Membrane Tethering. J. Biol. Chem. 2014;289:9683–9691. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.543561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Le Brun AP, Haigh CL, Drew SC, James M, Boland MP, Collins SJ. Neutron Reflectometry Studies Define Prion Protein N-terminal Peptide Membrane Binding. Biophys. J. 2014;107:2313–2324. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.09.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rondelli V, Brocca P, Motta S, Messa M, Colombo L, Salmona M, Fragneto G, Cantu L, Del Favero E. Amyloid-β Peptides in Interaction with Raft-Mime Model Membranes: A Neutron Reflectivity Insight. Sci Rep. 2016;6 doi: 10.1038/srep20997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Erlkamp M, Moulin J-F, Winter R, Czeslik C. Packing Effects of N-Ras Binding to a DOPC Membrane - a Neutron Reflectivity and TIRF Spectroscopy High-Pressure Study. Z. Phys. Chem. 2014;228:969–986. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.McGillivray DJ, Valincius G, Heinrich F, Robertson JWF, Vanderah DJ, Febo-Ayala W, Ignatjev I, Loesche M, Kasianowicz JJ. Structure of Functional Staphylococcus Aureus a-Hemolysin Channels in Tethered Bilayer Lipid Membranes. Biophys. J. 2009;96:1547–1553. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2008.11.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yap TL, Jiang Z, Heinrich F, Gruschus JM, Pfefferkorn CM, Barros M, Curtis JE, Sidransky E, Lee JC. Structural Features of Membrane-Bound Glucocerebrosidase and a-Synuclein Probed by Neutron Reflectometry and Fluorescence Spectroscopy. J. Biol. Chem. 2015;290:744–754. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.610584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Clifton LA, Johnson CL, Solovyova AS, Callow P, Weiss KL, Ridley H, Le Brun AP, Kinane CJ, Webster JRP, Holt SA, et al. Low Resolution Structure and Dynamics of a Colicin-Receptor Complex Determined by Neutron Scattering. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:337–346. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.302901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jacrot B. The Study of Biological Structures by Neutron Scattering from Solution. Rep. Prog. Phys. 1976;39:911–953. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Budvytyte R, Valincius G, Niaura G, Voiciuk V, Mickevicius M, Chapman H, Goh H-Z, Shekhar P, Heinrich F, Shenoy S, et al. Structure and Properties of Tethered Bilayer Lipid Membranes with Unsaturated Anchor Molecules. Langmuir. 2013;29:8645–8656. doi: 10.1021/la401132c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Burre J, Sharma M, Tsetsenis T, Buchman V, Etherton MR, Sudhof TC. a-Synuclein Promotes SNARE-Complex Assembly in Vivo and in Vitro. Science. 2010;329:1663–1667. doi: 10.1126/science.1195227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dikiy I, Eliezer D. Folding and Misfolding of a-Synuclein on Membranes. BBA-Biomembranes. 2012;1818:1013–1018. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.09.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lashuel HA, Overk CR, Oueslati A, Masliah E. The Many Faces of a-Synuclein: From Structure and Toxicity to Therapeutic Target. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2013;14:38–48. doi: 10.1038/nrn3406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Batjargal S, Wang YJ, Goldberg JM, Wissner RF, Petersson EJ. Native Chemical Ligation of Thioamide-Containing Peptides: Development and Application to the Synthesis of Labeled a-Synuclein for Misfolding Studies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:9172–9182. doi: 10.1021/ja2113245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Moran SD, Woys AM, Buchanan LE, Bixby E, Decatur SM, Zanni MT. Two-Dimensional IR Spectroscopy and Segmental C-13 Labeling Reveals the Domain Structure of Human γD-Crystallin Amyloid Fibrils. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:3329–3334. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117704109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hejjaoui M, Haj-Yahya M, Kumar KSA, Brik A, Lashuel HA. Towards Elucidation of the Role of Ubiquitination in the Pathogenesis of Parkinson's Disease with Semisynthetic Ubiquitinated a-Synuclein. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011;50:405–409. doi: 10.1002/anie.201005546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hejjaoui M, Butterfield S, Fauvet B, Vercruysse F, Cui J, Dikiy I, Prudent M, Olschewski D, Zhang Y, Eliezer D, et al. Elucidating the Role of C-Terminal Post-Translational Modifications Using Protein Semisynthesis Strategies: a-Synuclein Phosphorylation at Tyrosine 125. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:5196–5210. doi: 10.1021/ja210866j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fauvet B, Fares M-B, Samuel F, Dikiy I, Tandon A, Eliezer D, Lashuel HA. Characterization of Semisynthetic and Naturally N-a-Acetylated a-Synuclein in Vitro and in Intact Cells Implications for Aggregation and Cellular Properties of a-Synuclein. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:28243–28262. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.383711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Marotta NP, Lin YH, Lewis YE, Ambroso MR, Zaro BW, Roth MT, Arnold DB, Langen R, Pratt MR. O-GlcNAC Modification Blocks the Aggregation and Toxicity of the Protein a-Synuclein Associated with Parkinson's Disease. Nat. Chem. 2015;7:913–920. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Haj-Yahya M, Fauvet B, Herman-Bachinsky Y, Hejjaoui M, Bavikar SN, Karthikeyan SV, Ciechanover A, Lashuel HA, Brik A. Synthetic Polyubiquitinated a-Synuclein Reveals Important Insights into the Roles of the Ubiquitin Chain in Regulating Its Pathophysiology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:17726–17731. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1315654110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Masuda M, Dohmae N, Nonaka T, Oikawa T, Hisanaga SI, Goedert M, Hasegawa M. Cysteine Misincorporation in Bacterially Expressed Human a-Synuclein. FEBS Lett. 2006;580:1775–1779. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.02.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Davidson WS, Jonas A, Clayton DF, George JM. Stabilization of a-Synuclein Secondary Structure Upon Binding to Synthetic Membranes. J. Biol. Chem. 1998;273:9443–9449. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.16.9443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Eliezer D, Kutluay E, Bussell R, Browne G. Conformational Properties of a-Synuclein in Its Free and Lipid-Associated States. J. Mol. Biol. 2001;307:1061–1073. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jao CC, Der-Sarkissian A, Chen J, Langen R. Structure of Membrane-Bound a-Synuclein Studied by Site-Directed Spin Labeling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:8331–8336. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400553101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nuscher B, Kamp F, Mehnert T, Odoy S, Haass C, Kahle PJ, Beyer K. a-Synuclein Has a High Affinity for Packing Defects in a Bilayer Membrane - a Thermodynamics Study. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:21966–21975. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M401076200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ferreon ACM, Gambin Y, Lemke EA, Deniz AA. Interplay of a-Synuclein Binding and Conformational Switching Probed by Single-Molecule Fluorescence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:5645–5650. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809232106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pfefferkorn CM, Lee JC. Tryptophan Probes at the a-Synuclein and Membrane Interface. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2010;114:4615–4622. doi: 10.1021/jp908092e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Middleton ER, Rhoades E. Effects of Curvature and Composition on a-Synuclein Binding to Lipid Vesicles. Biophys. J. 2010;99:2279–2288. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.07.056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lokappa SB, Ulmer TS. a-Synuclein Populates Both Elongated and Broken Helix States on Small Unilamellar Vesicles. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:21450–21457. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.224055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bussell R, Eliezer D. A Structural and Functional Role for 11-Mer Repeats in a-Synuclein and Other Exchangeable Lipid Binding Proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 2003;329:763–778. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(03)00520-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Dikiy I, Eliezer D. N-Terminal Acetylation Stabilizes N-Terminal Helicity in Lipid- and Micelle-Bound a-Synuclein and Increases Its Affinity for Physiological Membranes. J. Biol. Chem. 2014;289:3652–3665. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.512459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bodner CR, Dobson CM, Bax A. Multiple Tight Phospholipid-Binding Modes of a-Synuclein Revealed by Solution NMR Spectroscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 2009;390:775–790. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.05.066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Pfefferkorn CM, Jiang Z, Lee JC. Biophysics of a-Synuclein Membrane Interactions. BBA-Biomembranes. 2012;1818:162–171. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.07.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Shenoy S, Moldovan R, Fitzpatrick J, Vanderah DJ, Deserno M, Losche M. In-Plane Homogeneity and Lipid Dynamics in Tethered Bilayer Lipid Membranes (tBLMs) Soft Matter. 2010;6:1263–1274. doi: 10.1039/B919988H. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

RESOURCES