There are errors in the second and last sentences of the last paragraph in the Results section. The correct second sentence should read: Ifih1 finally showed an independent relationship with percent CM-TG. In the last sentence, “lipoptotein” should be “lipoprotein.”
There are errors in the second and last sentences of the footnote in S3 Table. In the second sentence, log2FC ≥ “1.0” should be log2FC ≥ “0.58 (≥ 1.5-fold)”, and log2FC ≤ “-1.0” should be log2FC ≤ “-0.58 (≤ 0.67-fold).” In the last sentence, “M” of M. m. castaneus should be indicated in italics.
There is an error in the Relationship model column of Table 5. “Reactive” should be deleted. Please see the corrected Table 5 here.
Table 5. Results for Tests 2–4 of CIT analysis of the Ifih1 gene differentially expressed in epididymal WAT.
| P value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trait | Test 2 | Test 3 | Test 4 | Relationship modela |
| Body weight at 10 weeks | 0.14 | NA | NA | |
| Body weight at 14 weeks | 0.062 | NA | NA | |
| Weight gain at 6–10 weeks | 0.0027 | 0.015 | 0.0031 | |
| Total body length | 0.10 | NA | NA | |
| Epididymal WAT weight | 0.068 | NA | NA | |
| Testes weight | 0.23 | NA | NA | |
| LDL-C | 0.047 | 0.66 | 0.54 | |
| % Testes weight | 0.14 | NA | NA | |
| % Inguinal WAT weight | 0.055 | NA | NA | |
| % Epididymal WAT weight | 0.11 | NA | NA | |
| % Total WAT weight | 0.076 | NA | NA | |
| % CM-TG | 0.024 | 0.29 | 0.030 | Independent |
aSee Fig 1 for relationship models. CIT, causal inference test; WAT, white adipose tissue; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein of cholesterol; CM-TG, chylomicron of triglyceride; NA, not applicable.
Reference
- 1.Ishikawa A (2017) Identification of a Putative Quantitative Trait Gene for Resistance to Obesity in Mice Using Transcriptome Analysis and Causal Inference Tests. PLoS ONE 12(1): e0170652 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170652 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
