Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Perinatol. 2016 Oct 7;34(5):486–492. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1593536

Severe Vitamin D Deficiency in HIV-infected Pregnant Women is Associated with Preterm Birth

Jennifer Jao a, Laura Freimanis b, Marisa M Mussi-Pinhata c, Rachel A Cohen b, Jacqueline Pontes Monteiro c, Maria Leticia Cruz d, Andrea Branch e, Rhoda S Sperling f, George K Siberry g; for the NISDI LILAC Protocolh
PMCID: PMC5367960  NIHMSID: NIHMS844765  PMID: 27716863

Abstract

Background

Low maternal vitamin D has been associated with preterm birth (PTB). HIV-infected pregnant women are at risk for PTB, but data on maternal vitamin D and PTB in this population is scarce.

Methods

In a cohort of Latin American HIV-infected pregnant women from the NICHD International Site Development Initiative (NISDI) protocol, we examined the association between maternal vitamin D status and PTB. Vitamin D status was defined as the following 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels: severe deficiency (<10 ng/mL), deficiency (10-20 ng/mL), insufficiency (21–29 ng/mL), and sufficiency (≥30 ng/mL). PTB was defined as delivery at <37 weeks gestational age (GA). Logistic regression was used to assess the association between maternal vitamin D status and PTB.

Results

Of 715 HIV-infected pregnant women, 13 (1.8%) were severely vitamin D deficient, 224 (31.3%) deficient, and 233 (32.6%) insufficient. Overall, 23.2% (166/715) of pregnancies resulted in PTB [median GA of PTBs =36 wks (interquartile range: 34-36)]. In multivariate analysis, severe vitamin D deficiency was associated with PTB [Odds Ratio=4.7, 95% Confidence Interval: 1.3-16.8)].

Conclusion

Severe maternal vitamin D deficiency is associated with PTB in HIV-infected Latin American pregnant women. Further studies are warranted to determine if vitamin D supplementation in HIV-infected women may impact PTB.

Keywords: Vitamin D, Preterm Birth, HIV, Pregnant women, Pregnancy

INTRODUCTION

Vitamin D status during pregnancy has been linked to maternal and pregnancy outcomes. 1 Preterm birth (PTB) is a pregnancy outcome associated with significant morbidity and mortality worldwide and is the leading cause of neonatal and childhood mortality in those under the age of 5 years.2 Low maternal vitamin D status has been demonstrated in observational and clinical trials to be consistently associated with PTB.3-10 HIV-infected pregnant women, particularly those receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART), are at increased risk of PTB, 11,12 but data regarding maternal vitamin D and PTB in women with HIV infection is scarce. 13 Because of this increased risk of PTB in HIV-infected women on ART, potential associations involving vitamin D pathways would be important to elucidate as vitamin D supplementation could have increased impact on a population already at increased risk for PTB. The goal of this paper was to investigate the association between maternal vitamin D status and PTB in a large prospective cohort of HIV-infected pregnant women in Latin America and the Caribbean.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Population

The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) enrolled a prospective cohort of HIV-infected pregnant woman/infant dyads into the NICHD International Site Development Initiative (NISDI) Perinatal and Longitudinal Study in Latin American Countries (LILAC) protocols in Latin America and the Caribbean from 2002-2009. 14 Seventeen sites across Argentina, the Bahamas, Brazil, Mexico, Peru, and Jamaica participated. The Perinatal protocol enrolled HIV-infected pregnant women ≥8 weeks gestational age (GA), while the LILAC protocol enrolled those ≥22 weeks GA. Study visits were conducted antepartum (up to 2 visits), at delivery, and until 6 months (Perinatal protocol) or 2 years (LILAC protocol) postpartum. Data including medical histories, physical examinations, and laboratory assessments (hematology, flow cytometry assays, HIV RNA levels, and biochemistries) were collected during maternal study visits. Plasma specimens were collected from maternal and pediatric participants and stored in a central repository at −80°C for potential future studies. Informed consent was obtained for all enrolled participants. The study was approved by the NICHD Institutional Review Board (IRB), the Westat IRB, and in-country ethics committees and national review boards (where appropriate).

We restricted our study population to HIV-infected pregnant women enrolled for the first time (subsequent pregnancies were not included) in the NISDI Perinatal and/or LILAC protocols with available antepartum blood specimens collected between 12-34 weeks GA. In addition, only women whose pregnancies resulted in HIV-uninfected singleton live births were included.

Primary Outcome

The primary outcome was PTB, defined as delivery occurring at <37 weeks GA. These included both spontaneous and non-spontaneous PTBs. Infant GA at delivery was measured using obstetrical estimation by last menstrual period with or without ultrasound confirmation or by newborn examination. 15-18

Primary Exposure of Interest

Maternal plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) levels were measured on repository blood specimens using the Abbott Architect® chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay on the ARCHITECT i2000SR analyzer, according to manufacturer's instructions, at ARUP Laboratories (Salt Lake City, UT). 19 Methods and results of these 25OHD assays have been previously reported. 20 Maternal vitamin D status was defined as: severe deficiency (<10 ng/mL), deficiency (10-20 ng/mL), insufficiency (21–29 ng/mL), and sufficiency (≥30 ng/mL). 21

Measurements

Data regarding other potential confounders were collected including maternal age, socio-demographics, anthropometrics, previous PTB, pre-eclampsia/eclampsia, CD4 cell count, HIV RNA level, substance use during pregnancy, and cART use during pregnancy. Maternal body mass index (BMI) adjusted for GA at the time of enrollment was calculated. 22 CD4 cell count and HIV RNA levels were measured at the time of enrollment, and cART use during pregnancy was defined as the regimen lasting ≥28 days. Infant variables such as very low birth weight (VLBW) was defined as <1500 g, low birth weight (LBW) as 1500-2499 g, and small-for-gestational age (SGA) as per INTERGROWTH standards. 23

Statistical Analysis

Characteristics at enrollment were compared between severely deficient, deficient, insufficient, and sufficient vitamin D status using Kruskal-Wallis, chi-square, or Fisher’s exact tests as appropriate. Variables at least marginally associated with PTB (p ≤0.10) were considered candidates for multivariable analysis. Logistic regression modeling was used to assess the association between maternal vitamin D status and PTB while adjusting for confounders. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS® 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC.)

RESULTS

Among the 715 HIV-infected pregnant women included in this analysis, vitamin D status was severely deficient in 13 (1.8%), deficient in 224 (31.3%), insufficient in 233 (32.6%), and sufficient in 245 (34.2%). (Table 1) Severely vitamin D deficient women tended to have higher rates of vitamin D specimens collected during winter months compared to deficient, insufficient, or sufficient women (38.5% vs. 33.0%, 17.6%, and 6.5% respectively, p<0.01). Severely deficient women had lower rates of no cART use for ≥28 days during pregnancy compared to deficient, insufficient, and sufficient women (15.4% vs. 55.4%, 49.4%, and 39.2% respectively, p<0.01) and higher rates of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor use (46.2% vs. 17.4%, 17.6%, and 16.7% respectively, p<0.01). Maternal age, GA-adjusted BMI at enrollment, substance use during pregnancy, GA at vitamin D assessment, CD4 cell count and HIV RNA level at enrollment, rates of pre-eclampsia/eclampsia, and rates of previous PTB did not differ significantly by groups. In addition, rates of VLBW, LBW, and SGA amongst infants did not differ by maternal vitamin D status.

Table 1.

Characteristics of Women and Infants

Maternal Vitamin D Status

Severe
deficiency
(<10 ng/ml)
(n = 13)
Deficiency
(10-20
ng/ml)
(n = 224)
Insufficienc
y (21-29
ng/ml)
(n = 233)
Sufficiency
(≥30 ng/ml)
(n = 245)
Total
(n = 715)

Characteristics n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) p value
MATERNAL
Age, years
<20 0 (0.0) 8 (3.6) 12 (5.2) 17 (6.9) 37 (5.2) 0.26
20-29 4 (30.8) 110 (49.1) 121 (51.9) 131 (53.5) 366 (51.2)
>29 9 (69.2) 106 (47.3) 100 (42.9) 97 (39.6) 312 (43.6)
Maternal BMI at enrollment, kg/m2
Underweight (<19.8) 1 (8.3) 29 (13.2) 34 (15.1) 43 (17.9) 107 (15.4) 0.13
Normal (19.8-26.0) 5 (41.7) 129 (58.9) 135 (60.0) 155 (64.6) 424 (60.9)
Overweight (26.1-28.9) 3 (25.0) 30 (13.7) 30 (13.3) 23 (9.6) 86 (12.4)
Obese (≥29) 3 (25.0) 31 (14.2) 26 (11.6) 19 (7.9) 79 (11.4)
Substance use in
pregnancy
4 (30.8) 59 (26.3) 75 (32.2) 72 (29.4) 210 (29.4) 0.59
Season during vitamin D assessment
Autumn 2 (15.4) 55 (24.6) 70 (30.0) 96 (39.2) 223 (31.2) <0.01
Spring 5 (38.5) 70 (31.3) 70 (30.0) 45 (18.4) 190 (26.6)
Summer 1 (7.7) 25 (11.2) 52 (22.3) 88 (35.9) 166 (23.2)
Winter 5 (38.5) 74 (33.0) 41 (17.6) 16 (6.5) 136 (19.0)
Gestational age at vitamin D assessment
≤22 weeks 3 (23.1) 86 (38.4) 75 (32.2) 73 (29.8) 237 (33.1) 0.21
>22 weeks 10 (76.9) 138 (61.6) 158 (67.8) 172 (70.2) 478 (66.9)
CD4 count, cells/mm3 at enrollment
<200 1 (7.7) 34 (15.2) 32 (13.8) 45 (18.4) 112 (15.7) 0.17
200-49 7 (53.8) 123 (54.9) 113 (48.7) 136 (55.7) 379 (53.2)
≥500 5 (38.5) 67 (29.9) 87 (37.5) 63 (25.8) 222 (31.1)
HIV RNA level, copies/mL at enrollment
<1,000 10 (76.9) 108 (48.4) 140 (60.3) 135 (55.6) 393 (55.3) 0.07
1,000-9,999 0 (0.0) 53 (23.8) 41 (17.7) 55 (22.6) 149 (21.0)
≥10,000 3 (23.1) 62 (27.8) 51 (22.0) 53 (21.8) 169 (23.8)
cART regimen ≥ 28 days during pregnancy
2NRTIs or 1NRTI 1 (7.7) 9 (4.0) 16 (6.9) 15 (6.1) 41 (5.7) <0.01
2NRTIs+1NNRTI 6 (46.2) 39 (17.4) 41 (17.6) 41 (16.7) 127 (17.8)
2NRTIs+1PI 4 (30.8) 48 (21.4) 55 (23.6) 88 (35.9) 195 (27.3)
No ARV >=28 days 2 (15.4) 124 (55.4) 115 (49.4) 96 (39.2) 337 (47.1)
Other 0 (0.0) 4 (1.8) 6 (2.6) 5 (2.0) 15 (2.1)
Pre-eclampsia/
Eclampsia
2 (15.4) 8 (3.6) 5 (2.1) 7 (2.9) 22 (3.1) 0.12
Prior preterm birth 1 (7.7) 19 (8.5) 21 (9.0) 33 (13.5) 74 (10.3) 0.26
INFANT
Preterm Birth 8 (61.5) 59 (26.3) 43 (18.5) 56 (22.9) 166 (23.2) <0.01
Birth weight
VLBW (<1500 g) 0 (0.0) 2 (0.9) 1 (0.4) 5 (2.0) 8 (1.1) 0.26
LBW (<1500 - 2499 g) 3 (23.1) 22 (9.8) 32 (13.7) 36 (14.7) 93 (13.0)
Normal (≥ 2500 g) 10 (76.9) 200 (89.3) 200 (85.8) 204 (83.3) 614 (85.9)
Small-for-gestational
age
2 (15.4) 24 (10.7) 32 (13.7) 34 (13.9) 92 (12.9) 0.67

BMI=Body Mass Index; cART=combination antiretroviral therapy; LBW=Low Birth Weight; VLBW=Very Low Birth Weight

Overall, 23.2% (166/715) of pregnancies resulted in PTB [median GA of PTBs=36 wks (Interquartile Range: 34-36)]. After adjusting for age, substance use in pregnancy, CD4 count, HIV RNA level, body mass index (BMI), ARV use in pregnancy, pre-eclampsia/eclampsia, and prior PTB, severe vitamin D deficiency was associated with PTB [adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR)=4.7, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.3-16.8]. (Table 2) In stratified analyses, these results remained the same amongst women with vitamin D testing at ≤22 wks GA (aOR=2.7, 95%CI: 1.1-6.7) and those with vitamin D testing at >22 wks GA (aOR=7.0, 95%CI: 1.6-30.9) (results not shown). In addition, pre-eclampsia/eclampsia (aOR=5.8, 95%CI: 2.3-14.7), underweight maternal BMI (GA-adjusted BMI <19.8 kg/m²) (aOR=1.8, 95%CI: 1.1-3.0), and prior PTB (aOR=2.7, 95%CI: 1.6-4.6) were also associated with PTB.

Table 2.

Logistic Regression Results for the Relationship Between Maternal Vitamin D Status and Preterm Birth

Effect Unadjusted
OR
Unadjusted
95% CI
Adjusted ^
OR
Adjusted
95% CI
Maternal Vitamin D Status
Severe Deficiency (<10 ng/mL) 5.4 1.7 – 17. 2 4.7 1.3 – 16.8
Deficiency (10-20 ng/mL) 1.2 0.8 – 1.8 1.3 0.8 - 2.1
Insufficiency (21-29 ng/mL) 0.8 0.5 – 1.2 0.8 0.5 – 1.3
Sufficiency (≥ 30 ng/mL) Ref --- Ref ---
Maternal Age, years
<20 0.9 0.4 – 2.1 0.9 0.4 – 2.2
20-29 Ref --- Ref ---
>29 1.1 0.8 – 1.5 1.0 0.7 – 1.5
Maternal BMI (GA-adjusted), kg/m2
Underweight (<19.8) 1.7 1.0 – 2.7 1.8 1.1 – 3.0
Normal (19.8-26.0) Ref --- Ref ---
Overweight (26.1-28.9) 1.1 0.6 – 1.8 1.0 0.6 – 1.9
Obese (≥29) 1.3 0.7 – 2.2 1.0 0.6 – 1.9
Substance Use in Pregnancy 1.0 0.7 – 1.5 1.1 0.7 – 1.7
Pre-eclampsia/ Eclampsia 6.2 2.6 – 15.1 5.8 2.3 – 14.7
Prior Preterm Birth 2.5 1.5 – 4.2 2.7 1.6 – 4.6
CD4 cell count,* cells/mm3
<200 0.9 0.5 – 1.6 0.9 0.5 – 1.7
200 – 499 1.1 0.7 – 1.6 0.9 0.6 – 1.5
≥500 Ref --- Ref ---
HIV RNA level,* copies/mL
<1,000 Ref --- Ref ---
1,000 – 9,999 1.1 0.7 – 1.7 1.1 0.7 – 1.8
≥ 10,000 1.0 0.7 – 1.6 1.1 0.7 – 1.9
ARV Regimen *
2 NRTIs (dual)/1 NRTI (mono) 1.5 0.7 – 3.1 1.5 0.7 – 3.4
2 NRTIs + 1 NNRTI 1.1 0.7 – 1.8 1.1 0.6 – 1.9
2 NRTIs + 1 PI 1.3 0.9 – 2.0 1.2 0.7 – 1.9
Other 0.6 0.1 – 2.6 0.6 0.1 – 3.0
No ARV Ref --- Ref ---

ARV=Antiretroviral; BMI=Body Mass Index; CI=Confidence Interval; GA=Gestational Age; NRTI=Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor; NNRTI=Non-Nucleoside reverse Transcriptase; Inhibitor; OR= Odds Ratio; PI=Protease Inhibitor;

*

At enrollment,

^

Model adjusted for all variables listed in the table.

DISCUSSION

In this large cohort of Latin American HIV-infected pregnant women, we found severe maternal vitamin D deficiency to be associated with PTB. Only one other study has been published to date assessing the association between maternal vitamin D and PTB in HIV-infected women. 13 This study of 884 HIV-infected Tanzanian pregnant women reported no association. However, maternal vitamin D status was evaluated as a dichotomous variable, where adequate status was defined at a threshold of 32 ng/mL, and none of the women received antenatal ARVs.

Several studies amongst non HIV-infected pregnant women have evaluated associations between low maternal vitamin D status and PTB 3-10,24,25 with the majority reporting an inverse association between maternal vitamin D levels and PTB. 3-10 A joint analysis of two maternal vitamin D supplementation trials in the U.S. revealed a lower risk of PTB in women with vitamin D levels >40 ng/mL compared to those with levels <20 ng/mL [adjusted relative risk (aRR)=0.41, 95% CI: 0.20,0.86]. 7 Another large U.S. case-control study demonstrated increased risk of PTB at maternal vitamin D levels < 50 nmol/L (≤ 20 ng/mL) and between 50-74.9 nmol/L (20 ng/mL – 30 ng/mL) where increasing risk occurred at lower vitamin D levels. 3 In a large Chinese study of 821 mother-infant pairs mean maternal vitamin D levels differed between those with very PTB (<32 weeks GA) and mild PTB (32-36 weeks GA) (p=0.01) as well as between very PTB and term birth (p=0.001) 10 A Spanish cohort reported increased risk of PTB with maternal vitamin D levels <20 ng/mL (aOR=3.31, 95% CI: 1.52, 7.19). 6 Lastly, the results of a meta-analysis demonstrated an overall increased risk of PTB with maternal vitamin D levels <50 nmol/L (<20 ng/mL) (aOR=1.58, 95% CI: 1.08, 2.31). 9

The fact that we found evidence for increased PTB risk at the most severe levels of vitamin D deficiency and not at all levels of vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency is consistent with other studies. 3,7,9 Post hoc analyses of the two U.S. randomized clinical trials mentioned above showed that the positive association between maternal vitamin D levels and GA at birth was strongest at levels <20 ng/mL and no association between maternal vitamin D levels of 20-39 ng/mL and PTB were found. 7 In addition, a large meta-analysis reported associations between low maternal vitamin D levels and PTB when the exposure of interest was dichotomized at 50 nmol/L (20 ng/mL) but not at 75 nmol/L (30 ng/mL). 9 This demonstrates that there may be a clinically significant and detectable effect of maternal vitamin D status only at the most severe level of deficiency. Of note, when we combined severely deficient and deficient vitamin D HIV-infected women into the same exposure group, we did not see an effect on PTB. (Data not shown).

The mechanisms by which vitamin D may play a role in PTB amongst HIV-infected women remain unclear. The etiology of PTB is likely multifactorial but emphasis has been placed on the role of inflammatory processes. 26 Vitamin D and its active metabolite, 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25OH2D), have been reported to have immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects, 27-29 raising the notion that vitamin D may help mitigate PTB by regulating inflammation. Of note, there was a significantly higher proportion of women receiving non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) among women with severe vitamin D deficiency, and though ART type was not associated with PTB in our analysis, a potential link between NNRTI use, low maternal vitamin D status, and PTB could be explored.

Our study was limited by the small number of women who had severe vitamin D deficiency and our inability to distinguish between spontaneous and non-spontaneous PTB. As a result, we may have over-estimated the effect of severe maternal vitamin D deficiency on spontaneous PTB. In addition, we could not assess for vitamin D supplementation which may have occurred during the pregnancy. Lastly, the range of GA at which antenatal vitamin D was assessed spanned all three trimesters with the majority occurring after 22 weeks GA, making it difficult to pinpoint a particular time at which maternal vitamin D status is most strongly associated with PTB. However, vitamin D measurements taken closer to delivery have been shown to correlate more strongly with PTB. 8 In addition, our results were similar even in analyses stratified by GA at the time of vitamin D testing.

PTB results in both significant mortality and morbidity as well as economic burden, particularly for resource-constrained settings. 30 These effects may be even more pronounced in HIV-exposed infants given their increased risk for poor growth 31,32 and infections 33. Severe maternal vitamin D deficiency appears to be associated with PTB in HIV-infected Latin American pregnant women. As vitamin D is a safe and inexpensive supplement, future studies are warranted to understand mechanisms by which vitamin D may affect PTB, including the ones regulated by vitamin D receptor and its polymorphisms affecting functionality at the placenta-decidua interface 34 and the mechanisms by which other micronutrients interact with vitamin D to protect against preterm delivery. 35 This will support a future platform for the study of potential vitamin D supplementation interventions in HIV-infected pregnant women.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health [Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Contract # N01-HD-3-3345 (2002-2007) and NICHD Contract #HHSN267200800001C (NICHD Control #: N01-HD-8-0001) (2007-2012)] and by Abbott® Laboratories. JJ is supported by NICHD K23HD070760.

Appendix 1.

Principal investigators, co-principal investigators, study coordinators, coordinating center representatives, and NICHD staff include: Argentina: Buenos Aires: Marcelo H. Losso, Irene Foradori, Alejandro Hakim, Erica Stankievich, Silvina Ivalo (Hospital General de Agudos José María Ramos Mejía); Brazil: Belo Horizonte: Jorge A. Pinto, Victor H. Melo, Fabiana Kakehasi, Beatriz M. Andrade (Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais); Caxias do Sul: Rosa Dea Sperhacke, Nicole Golin, Sílvia Mariani Costamilan (Universidade de Caxias do Sul/ Serviço Municipal de Infectologia); Nova Iguacu: Jose Pilotto, Luis Eduardo Fernandes, Gisely Falco (Hospital Geral Nova de Iguacu - HIV Family Care Clinic); Porto Alegre: Rosa Dea Sperhacke, Breno Riegel Santos, Rita de Cassia Alves Lira (Universidade de Caxias do Sul/Hospital Conceição); Rosa Dea Sperhacke, Mario Ferreira Peixoto, Elizabete Teles (Universidade de Caxias do Sul/Hospital Fêmina); Regis Kreitchmann, Luis Carlos Ribeiro, Fabrizio Motta, Debora Fernandes Coelho (Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericordia de Porto Alegre); Ribeirão Preto: Marisa M. Mussi-Pinhata, Geraldo Duarte, Adriana A. Tiraboschi Bárbaro, Conrado Milani Coutinho, Fabiana Rezende Amaral, Anderson Sanches de Melo (Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo); Rio de Janeiro: Ricardo Hugo S. Oliveira, Elizabeth S. Machado, Maria C. Chermont Sapia (Instituto de Puericultura e Pediatria Martagão Gesteira); Esau Custodio Joao, Leon Claude Sidi, Maria Leticia Santos Cruz, Maria Isabel Gouvêa, Mariza Curto Saavedra, Clarisse Bressan, Fernanda Cavalcanti A. Jundi (Hospital dos Servidores do Estado); São Paulo: Regina Celia de Menezes Succi, Prescilla Chow (Escola Paulista de Medicina- Universidade Federal de São Paulo); Peru: Lima: Jorge O. Alarcón Villaverde (Instituto de Medicina Tropicalal “Daniel Alcides Carrión”- Sección de Epidemiología, UNMSM), Carlos Velásquez Vásquez (Instituto Nacional Materno Perinatal), César Gutiérrez Villafuerte (Instituto de Medicina Tropicalal “Daniel Alcides Carrión”- Sección de Epidemiología, UNMSM); Data Management and Statistical Center: Yolanda Bertucci, Rachel Cohen, Laura Freimanis Hance, René Gonin, D. Robert Harris, Roslyn Hennessey, James Korelitz, Margot Krauss, Sue Li, Karen Megazzini, Orlando Ortega, Sharon Sothern de Sanchez, Sonia K. Stoszek, Qilu Yu (Westat, Rockville, MD, USA); NICHD: George K. Siberry, Rohan Hazra, Lynne M. Mofenson (Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland, USA). Supported by NICHD Contract # N01-HD-3-3345 (2002-2007) and by NICHD Contract # HHSN267200800001C (NICHD Control #: N01-HD-8-0001) (2007-2012).

Footnotes

The authors have no financial disclosures to make. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Institutes of Health or the Department of Health and Human Services.

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to disclose.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Triunfo S, Lanzone A. Potential impact of maternal vitamin D status on obstetric well-being. J Endocrinol Invest. 2016;39(1):37–44. doi: 10.1007/s40618-015-0330-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nour NM. Premature delivery and the millennium development goal. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2012;5(2):100–105. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bodnar LM, Platt RW, Simhan HN. Early-pregnancy vitamin D deficiency and risk of preterm birth subtypes. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(2):439–447. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dawodu A, Nath R. High prevalence of moderately severe vitamin D deficiency in preterm infants. Pediatr Int. 2011;53(2):207–210. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-200X.2010.03209.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Morley R, Carlin JB, Pasco JA, Wark JD. Maternal 25-hydroxyvitamin D and parathyroid hormone concentrations and offspring birth size. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(3):906–912. doi: 10.1210/jc.2005-1479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Perez-Ferre N, Torrejon MJ, Fuentes M, et al. Association of low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in pregnancy with glucose homeostasis and obstetric and newborn outcomes. Endocr Pract. 2012;18(5):676–684. doi: 10.4158/EP12025.OR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wagner CL, Baggerly C, McDonnell S, et al. Post-hoc analysis of vitamin D status and reduced risk of preterm birth in two vitamin D pregnancy cohorts compared with South Carolina March of Dimes 2009-2011 rates. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2016;155:245–251. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2015.10.022. Pt B. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wagner CL, Baggerly C, McDonnell SL, et al. Post-hoc comparison of vitamin D status at three timepoints during pregnancy demonstrates lower risk of preterm birth with higher vitamin D closer to delivery. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2015;148:256–260. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2014.11.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wei SQ, Qi HP, Luo ZC, Fraser WD. Maternal Vitamin D Status and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013 doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.765849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhu T, Liu TJ, Ge X, et al. High prevalence of maternal vitamin D deficiency in preterm births in northeast China, Shenyang. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8(2):1459–1465. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chen JY, Ribaudo HJ, Souda S, et al. Highly active antiretroviral therapy and adverse birth outcomes among HIV-infected women in Botswana. J Infect Dis. 2012;206(11):1695–1705. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Townsend C, Schulte J, Thorne C, et al. Antiretroviral therapy and preterm delivery-a pooled analysis of data from the United States and Europe. BJOG. 2010;117(11):1399–1410. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02689.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mehta S, Hunter DJ, Mugusi FM, et al. Perinatal outcomes, including mother-to-child transmission of HIV, and child mortality and their association with maternal vitamin D status in Tanzania. J Infect Dis. 2009;200(7):1022–1030. doi: 10.1086/605699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Read JS, Duarte G, Hance LF, et al. The NICHD International Site Development Initiative perinatal cohorts (2002-09) Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(3):642–649. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyr024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ballard JL, Khoury JC, Wedig K, et al. New Ballard Score, expanded to include extremely premature infants. J Pediatr. 1991;119(3):417–423. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)82056-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dubowitz LM, Dubowitz V, Goldberg C. Clinical assessment of gestational age in the newborn infant. J Pediatr. 1970;77(1):1–10. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(70)80038-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Attico NB, Meyer DJ, Bodin HJ, Dickman DS. Gestational age assessment. Am Fam Physician. 1990;41(2):553–560. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Szyld EG, Warley EM, Freimanis L, et al. Maternal antiretroviral drugs during pregnancy and infant low birth weight and preterm birth. AIDS. 2006;20(18):2345–2353. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000253362.01696.9d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Abbott Architect System 25OHD Package Insert. Abbott Laboratories; 2011. REF 3L52. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jao J, Freimanis L, Mussi-Pinhata MM, et al. Low vitamin D status among pregnant Latin American and Caribbean women with HIV Infection. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;130(1):54–58. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.01.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Holick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, et al. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(7):1911–1930. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-0385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Argentina Ministry of Health National Data from Maternity and Childhood, health care program for women, children and teenagers. Available from: http://www.msal.gov.ar/promin/archivos/softs/nutri13.zip. Accessed 11 April 2013.
  • 23.Villar J, Cheikh Ismail L, Victora CG, et al. International standards for newborn weight, length, and head circumference by gestational age and sex: the Newborn Cross-Sectional Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Lancet. 2014;384(9946):857–868. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60932-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Baker AM, Haeri S, Camargo CA, Jr., Stuebe AM, Boggess KA. A nested case-control study of first-trimester maternal vitamin D status and risk for spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Perinatol. 2011;28(9):667–672. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1276731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Shand AW, Nassar N, Von Dadelszen P, Innis SM, Green TJ. Maternal vitamin D status in pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcomes in a group at high risk for pre-eclampsia. BJOG. 2010;117(13):1593–1598. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02742.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Christiaens I, Zaragoza DB, Guilbert L, et al. Inflammatory processes in preterm and term parturition. J Reprod Immunol. 2008;79(1):50–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2008.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Diaz L, Noyola-Martinez N, Barrera D, et al. Calcitriol inhibits TNF-alpha-induced inflammatory cytokines in human trophoblasts. J Reprod Immunol. 2009;81(1):17–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2009.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tamblyn JA, Hewison M, Wagner CL, Bulmer JN, Kilby MD. Immunological role of vitamin D at the maternal-fetal interface. J Endocrinol. 2015;224(3):R107–121. doi: 10.1530/JOE-14-0642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mora JR, Iwata M, von Andrian UH. Vitamin effects on the immune system: vitamins A and D take centre stage. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8(9):685–698. doi: 10.1038/nri2378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Harrison MS, Goldenberg RL. Global burden of prematurity. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015 doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2015.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Powis KM, Smeaton L, Hughes MD, et al. In-utero triple antiretroviral exposure associated with decreased growth among HIV-exposed uninfected infants in Botswana. AIDS. 2016;30(2):211–220. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000000895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jao J, Agwu A, Mhango G, et al. Growth patterns in the first year of life differ in infants born to perinatally vs. nonperinatally HIV-infected women. AIDS. 2015;29(1):111–116. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000000501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Baroncelli S, Galluzzo CM, Mancinelli S, et al. Antibodies against pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide in Malawian HIV-positive mothers and their HIV-exposed uninfected children. Infect Dis (Lond) 2015:1–5. doi: 10.3109/23744235.2015.1115895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Manzon L, Altarescu G, Tevet A, et al. Vitamin D receptor polymorphism FokI is associated with spontaneous idiopathic preterm birth in an Israeli population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;177:84–88. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Catov JM, Bodnar LM, Olsen J, Olsen S, Nohr EA. Periconceptional multivitamin use and risk of preterm or small-for-gestational-age births in the Danish National Birth Cohort. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94(3):906–912. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.012393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES