Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gastroenterology. 2016 Dec 23;152(5):983–986.e6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.12.010

Germline Mutations in PALB2, BRCA1, and RAD51C, Which Regulate DNA Recombination Repair, in Patients with Gastric Cancer

Ruta Sahasrabudhe 1,*, Paul Lott 1,*, Mabel Bohorquez 2, Ted Toal 1, Ana P Estrada 2, John J Suarez 2, Alejandro Brea-Fernández 3, José Cameselle-Teijeiro 4, Carla Pinto 5, Irma Ramos 6, Alejandra Mantilla 7, Rodrigo Prieto 2,a, Alejandro Corvalan 8, Enrique Norero 8, Carolina Alvarez 9, Teresa Tapia 9, Pilar Carvallo 9, Luz M Gonzalez 10, Alicia Cock-Rada 10, Angela Solano 11, Florencia Neffa 12, Adriana Della Valle 12, Chris Yau 13, Gabriela Soares 14, Alexander Borowsky 15, Nan Hu 16, Li-Ji He 17, Xiao-You Han 18; Latin American Gastric Cancer Genetics Collaborative Group19, Philip R Taylor 16, Alisa M Goldstein 16, Javier Torres 5, Magdalena Echeverry 2, Clara Ruiz-Ponte 3, Manuel R Teixeira 5,20, Luis G Carvajal Carmona 1,21
PMCID: PMC5367981  NIHMSID: NIHMS838951  PMID: 28024868

Abstract

Up to 10% of cases of gastric cancer are familial, but so far, only mutations in CDH1 have been associated with gastric cancer risk. To identify genetic variants that affect risk for gastric cancer, we collected blood samples from 28 patients with hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) not associated with mutations in CDH1 and performed whole-exome sequence analysis. We then analyzed sequences of candidate genes in 333 independent HDGC and non-HDGC cases. We identified 11 cases with mutations in PALB2, BRCA1, or RAD51C genes, which regulate homologous DNA recombination. We found these mutations in 2 of 31 patients with HDGC (6.5%) and 9 of 331 patients with sporadic gastric cancer (2.8%). Most of these mutations had been previously associated with other types of tumors and partially co-segregated with gastric cancer in our study. Tumors that developed in patients with these mutations had a mutation signature associated with somatic homologous recombination deficiency. Our findings indicate that defects in homologous recombination increase risk for gastric cancer.

Keywords: stomach, tumor, WES, interaction


Worldwide, gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most commonly diagnosed malignancy and the third cause of cancer-related deaths 1. Up to 10% of cases show familial clustering, suggesting a genetic basis 2. CDH1 mutations are a known cause of hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC), explaining ~ 40% of cases 3,4, but the genetics of non-HDGC remain largely unknown. To identify novel GC genes, we analyzed CDH1 mutation-negative HDGC cases using whole exome sequencing (WES) followed by candidate gene targeted analyses in independent HDGC and non-HDGC cases.

WES of 28 CDH1-negative European HDGC cases identified three with candidate causal variants (Table 1): nonsense (p.Arg414Ter) and splice site (c.3201+1G>T) PALB2 mutations, and a nonsense RAD51C (p.Arg237Ter) mutation. No deleterious mutations were seen in other known cancer genes (Supplementary methods). PALB2 and RAD51C are both critical in homologous recombination (HR), a major DNA repair pathway 5. Both of the above PALB2 mutations have been previously reported as pathogenic in breast cancer (BC) families 6 and RAD51C p.Arg237Ter is reported as pathogenic in ClinVar7.

Table 1.

Details of clinical information of the mutation carriers

Mutation details ID Age of onset Sex Histology Satisfied HDGC criteria ? Helicobacter Pylori infection History of smoking
PALB2
c.1240C>T, p.Arg414Ter
CG-12a* 69 M Intestinal No NA NA
CG-008c 48 F Diffuse NA NA Yes
GM037589 46 F NA No Negative No
PALB2
c.3201+1G>T
CG-05a 50 M Diffuse Yes Negative No
PALB2
c. 1882_1890delGCAGGACTT, p.Lys628_Cys630del
CG-039b 47 F Diffuse NA Negative No
CG-028c* 81 M Intestinal NA Negative Yes
PALB2
c.2753C>A, p.Pro918Gln
3CG-103b* 79 F Mixed No Negative Yes
BRCA1
c.3331_3334delCAAG, p.Gln1111Asnfs
CG-036b 67 F Diffuse No NA No
CG-059b 54 M Diffuse No NA No
BRCA1
c.1674delA, p.Gly559Valfs
CG-001c 65 M NA No Positive Yes
RAD51C
c.709 C>T, p.Arg237Ter
GM022584a* 73 M Diffuse Yes Negative No

Identified by:

a

WES,

b

targeted sequencing or

c

genotyping.

*

LOH and mutational signature analyzed.

NA: Not available

We then performed targeted sequencing of PALB2 and RAD51C, their interaction partners BRCA1/2 and CDH1 in 173 additional Latin American GC cases. Based upon enrichment of HR mutations in our discovery cohort and a recent report showing multiple intestinal, diffuse and mixed histology gastric tumors with a somatic HR deficiency signature 8 , our validation cohort included both HDGC and non-HDGC cases of diffuse and non-diffuse histology (Supplementary methods). Targeted sequencing identified four additional mutation carriers: two sharing a known Hispanic BRCA1 founder mutation (p.Gln1111Asnfs) 9 and two with novel PALB2 mutations (p.Pro918Gln and p.Lys628_Cys630del) with predicted deleterious effects. Residue Pro918 falls in the PALB2 WD40 domain, which mediates interactions with BRCA2, RAD51 and RAD51C, whereas Lys628-Cys630 resides in the binding domain of MRG15, a transcription regulator and whose PALB2 interaction is required for homology directed DNA double-strand break repair indicating potential pathogenicity of these two novel mutations 10, 11.

In a third phase of the study, we genotyped all six PALB2, RAD51C and BRCA1 mutations described above plus four known Hispanic BRCA1/2 founder mutations (Supplementary methods) in 160 independent Latin American non-HDGC cases and found three additional mutation carriers, one with a BRCA1 mutation (p.Gly559Valfs) and two with PALB2 mutations (p.Lys628_Cys630del and p.Arg414Ter, Table 1). Interestingly, during the preparation of this manuscript, our clinic-based Portuguese collaborator (MT), identified one additional GC case (GM037589) with PALB2 p.Arg414Ter. None of the seven PALB2, RAD51C and BRCA1 mutations, detected in 11 unrelated Caucasian and Latin American cases, was detected in 1,170 population-matched controls (see mutation details in Supplementary Table 1).

Clinical details of our mutation carriers are given in Table 1. Most of them had diffuse histology, two had HDGC syndrome (CG-05 and GM022584) and one reported history of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC, case CG-36, not shown). These mutation carriers were predominantly non-smokers and/or negative for Helicobacter pylori infection (Table 1), which suggest that GC risk in most of these cases was not driven by these two known environmental risk factors12.

To obtain additional evidence of the causality of our HR gene mutations, we carried out loss of heterozygosity (LOH), mutational signature and co-segregation analyses in available samples from tumors and relatives. For LOH and mutational signatures, we performed WES in four available tumor samples from three PALB2 (CG-12/p.Arg414Ter, CG-028/p.Lys628_Cys630del and 3CG-103/p.Pro918Gln) and RAD51C mutation carriers (Table 1). We found no LOH or compound heterozygosity in these tumor samples (not shown). Interestingly, when we analyzed the somatic WES data for mutational signatures, we found that all four tumors were enriched for a signature indicative of HR defects 13, 14, providing evidence for the causality of these mutations (Supplementary methods, Supplementary Figures 1 and 2).

Figure 1 shows available pedigrees from mutation carriers. Case 3CG-103 and her daughter were both diagnosed with GC and carried the PALB2 p.Pro918Gln mutation (Figure 1A). GM037589, a PALB2 p.Arg414Ter carrier, developed GC and BC and had a sister diagnosed with ovarian and endometrial cancer who also carried PALB2 p.Arg414Ter (Figure 1B). The RAD51C p.Arg237Ter carrier’s son died of colon cancer but did not carry the mutation (Figure 1C). We found that GC was the predominantly diagnosed malignancy among unavailable relatives of these carriers (Figures 1A–1D). Although we did not have access to samples from relatives of the PALB2 p.Lys628_Cys630del carriers, our local collaborators found this mutation co-segregating in an unrelated breast cancer family (unpublished). Albeit limited, our co-segregation data partially support GC causality of PALB2 mutations. The RAD51C co-segregation data is however inconclusive but the presence of a strong HR signature in the gastric tumor (see above) of this mutation carrier warrants further studies on RAD51C as a candidate GC gene.

In summary, our study identified eleven cases with mutations in PALB2, BRCA1 and RAD51C, three closely-related HR genes. Some of these mutations are known to be pathogenic in other cancer types. Out of 362 cases analyzed, 6.45% of the HDGC cases (2 out of 31) and 2.7% (9 out of 331) of non-HDGC cases had PALB2, BRCA1 or RAD51C mutations, suggesting that HR genes play a role in GC risk. Our data also provide evidence of a germline basis for the recently reported HR mutational signature in gastric tumors and strengthens the evidence for a causal role of these genes, specifically PALB2, in GC, as previously observed 4, 15. Future larger studies are needed to definitively assign causality and understand the penetrance and prevalence of HR gene mutations in GC and to further understand if and why some individuals from HBOC families with HR gene mutations develop GC. Further characterizations of the GC histology in HR gene mutation carriers are also needed as we found instances where the same mutation was found in cases with different histologies (CG-12 and CG-008 with PALB2 p.Arg414ter and CG-039 and CG-028 with PALB2 p.Lys628_Cys630del, Table 1). CDH1 mutation negative families might benefit from HR gene testing and increased endoscopic surveillance and targeted therapies, such as PARP inhibitors 8.

Supplementary Material

Acknowledgments

Grant support – No Stomach For Cancer Inc and the University of California, Davis provided the principal funding for this study. AC received funding from Conicyt-Fondap (15130011), CR-P received funding from Investigacion Sanitaria/FEDER (14/00230, 14/00173) and from the European Commission H2020-PHC (GA nº635290). ME and LGC-C received funding from Fondo de Investigaciones, Universidad del Tolima (Projects 30113, 160120516, 450110, 160114) and from COLCIENCIAS (Project 470115). JT was supported by CONACYT-Fronteras de la Ciencia (clave 773), and Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (FIS/IMSS/PROT/PRIO/13/027). This work was also supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute, the National Institutes of Health, the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics. LGC-C received funding from the V Foundation from Cancer Research and from the National Cancer Institute (K12CA138464 and R21CA199631) of the National Institutes of Health. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

We thank all patients and their families for participating in the study and to multiple clinicians and research nurses who helped with patient recruitment. We are thankful to No Stomach For Cancer Inc. and the University of California Davis for providing principal financial support to the study. We are grateful to former Carvajal-Carmona laboratory members John Williamson, Julian Halmai, Anna Marie Tuazon and Cathy Wang for their support during the study. We are also grateful to Drs. Yuichi Shiraishi and Matthew Stephens for their support and stimulating discussions about mutational signature analyses.

Members of the Latin American Gastric Cancer Genetics Collaborative Group: Magdalena Echeverry1, Mabel Bohorquez1, Rodrigo Prieto1, John Suarez1, Gilbert Mateus2, Maria Mercedes Bravo3, Fernando Bolaños4, Alejandro Vélez5, Alejandro Corvalan6, Pilar Carvallo7, Javier Torres8, Luis Carvajal-Carmona9.

1 Universidad del Tolima, Ibagué, Colombia; 2 Hospital Federico Lleras Acosta, Ibagué, Colombia; 3 Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, D.C, Colombia; 4 Hospital Hernando Moncaleano Perdomo, Neiva, Colombia; 5 Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe, Medellín, Colombia; 6 Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile; 7 Departamento de Biología Celular y Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile, 8 Unidad de Investigación en Enfermedades Infecciosas, UMAE Pediatria, IMSS, México City, México; 8 University of California, Davis.

Abbreviations

GC

gastric cancer

HDGC

hereditary diffuse gastric cancer

WES

whole exome sequencing

LOH

loss of heterozygosity

BC

breast cancer

R

homologous recombination

Footnotes

Disclosure: The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Author contribution: Study concept and design = RS, MT, LGCC; Acquisition of data = RS, PL, MB, APE, JJS, ABF, CP, IR, AM, RP, JS, AC, EN, CA, TT, PC, LMG, ACR, AS, FN, ADV, CY, GS, AB, NH, LJH, XYH, PRT, AMG, JT, ME, CRP, MT, LGCC; Analysis and interpretation of data = PL, RS, TT, LGCC; Drafting of the manuscript = RS, LGCC; Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content = RS, PL, TT, AG, JT, ME, JCT, AB, CRP, MT, LGCC; Statistical analysis = RS, PL, TT, LGCC; Obtained funding= LGCC; Administrative, technical, or material support = RS, PL, MT, JT, CRP, ME, LGCC; Study supervision = RS, PL, MT, JT, CRP, ME, LGCC

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

Author names in bold designate shared co-first authorship

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

RESOURCES