Abstract
In the adult skeleton, cells of the immune system interact with those of the skeleton during all phases of bone repair to influence the outcome. Mast cells are immune cells best known for their pathologic role in allergy, and may be involved in chronic inflammatory and fibrotic disorders. Potential roles for mast cells in tissue homeostasis, vascularization and repair remain enigmatic. Previous studies in combined mast cell- and Kit-deficient KitW-sh/W-sh mice (KitW-sh) implicated mast cells in bone repair but KitW-sh mice suffer from additional Kit-dependent hematopoietic and non- hematopoietic deficiencies that could have confounded the outcome. The goal of the current study was to compare bone repair in normal wild type (WT) and Cpa3Cre/+ mice, which lack mast cells in the absence of any other hematopoietic or non- hematopoietic deficiencies. Repair of a femoral window defect was characterized using micro CT imaging and histological analyses from the early inflammatory phase, through soft and hard callus formation, and finally the remodeling phase. The data indicate 1) mast cells appear in healing bone of WT mice but not Cpa3Cre/+ mice, beginning 14 days after surgery; 2) re-vascularization of repair tissue and deposition of mineralized bone was delayed and dis-organised in Cpa3Cre/+ mice compared with WT mice; 3) the defects in Cpa3Cre/+ mice were associated with little change in anabolic activity and biphasic alterations in osteoclast and macrophage activity. The outcome at 56 days postoperative was complete bridging of the defect in most WT mice and fibrous mal-union in most Cpa3Cre/+ mice. The results indicate that mast cells promote bone healing, possibly by recruiting vascular endothelial cells during the inflammatory phase and coordinating anabolic and catabolic activity during tissue remodeling. Taken together the data indicate that mast cells have a positive impact on bone repair.
Introduction
It has been proposed that the discreet phases of bone repair in response to injury recapitulate those during development that give rise to the adult skeleton [1]. It was recognized decades ago that cells of the immune system interact with those of the skeletal system during development and in the adult bone healing micro-environment. The term “osteoimmunology” was coined to define these complex interactions between lymphocytes, macrophages, mast cells, osteoclasts, osteoblasts and others [2]. In the long bones of the adult skeleton the bone healing cascade is initiated with a blood clot and an inflammatory response during which cells migrate to the site of injury [3]. The hematoma is replaced by granulation tissue to form a soft callus, metalloproteases cleave collagen and stored growth factors and cytokines are released. Angiogenic factors attract vascular endothelial cells, which form vessels throughout the repair tissue. Bone anabolic agents such as Wnt ligands, parathyroid hormone (PTH) and related protein (PTHrP) and bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) induce differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) into osteoblasts. Woven bone is deposited by these cells in and around the soft callus to form a hard callus, which is then remodeled by osteoclasts delivered through the new vessels.
Mast cells belong to the hematopoietic system and mast cell committed progenitors have been identified in fetal and adult mouse blood [4, 5]. They migrate to peripheral tissues such as lung, skin and intestine where mature mast cells are stored over the long term [6]. Mast cells are best known for their pathologic role in allergic diseases. Less well established are their suggested physiologic roles in tissue homeostasis and repair that include neo-vascularization [7]. Mast cells contain the proteases tryptase and chymase along with a variety of cytokines and chemokines that contribute to allergic inflammation, but some of which may also act as mediators of tissue repair. These include TNFα, prostaglandin (PG) D2, leukotriene (LT) C4, monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP), macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP) and a plethora of interleukins (ILs). The functional heterogeneity of mast cells is proposed to arise from differential activation of the FcεR1 by IgE or activation of a wide range of pattern recognition toll like receptors (TLR). Generally speaking, FcεR1 activation is proposed to trigger release of proteases and cytokines stored in granules, whereas TLR activation results in de novo synthesis and release of a different sub-set of bioactive mediators [8].
An early study of fracture repair in young rats revealed mast cells adjacent to blood vessels in the soft callus at two weeks of healing and distributed throughout the hard callus near osteoclasts at six weeks [9], suggesting these cells played a role in the healing process. A study conducted under steady state on mast cell-deficient mice carrying a mutation in the receptor for stem cell factor Kit (Kit W/Wv) revealed alterations in femoral bone mass and geometry leading to decreased mechanical strength [10]. However, the KitW/Wv mice also exhibited anemia, neutropenia and other defects [11] that could have impacted the outcome. Our recent work on another strain of Kit mutant mice, KitW-sh, revealed that bone regeneration in a femoral defect was defective in these mice (Behrends 2014), raising the intriguing possibility that mast cells are involved in bone repair. KitW-sh mice were originally suggested to be mast cell deficient in the absence of other major hematopoietic cell deficiencies [12]. However, subsequent work showed that KitW-sh mice suffer from a multitude of phenotypes beyond the mast cell deficiency [13–15].
Mouse mutants specifically lacking individual immune cell lineages are powerful resources to investigate the osteoimmunology of bone healing. Until now, mast cell deficient mice wildtype for Kit have not been used to this end. The goal of the current study was to characterize the impact of mast cell deficiency on bone repair using Cpa3Cre/+ mice. Introduction of Cre recombinase into the gene encoding carboxypeptidase A3 (Cpa3), which is expressed at very high levels only in the mast cell lineage, results in the complete absence of mast cells in connective and mucosal tissues by genotoxicity [16]. This model of mast cell deficiency has been used by many investigators to probe roles of mast cells under physiological and pathological conditions. Of note, in almost all instances, the suggested roles of mast cells could not be reproduced, thus contesting previous work in Kit mutant mice [11, 15]. Because Cpa3Cre/+ mice have no defects in the immune system other than the complete absence of mast cells and a partial reduction in basophils, we consider these mice an appropriate model to investigate the potential contribution of mast cells to bone repair in the absence of confounding factors arising from alteration in other cell lineages.
Materials and methods
Mouse model of mast cell deficiency
Animal procedures were conducted in accordance with a protocol approved by the Facility Animal Care Committee of McGill University (AUP-7016), in keeping with the guidelines of the Canada Council on Animal Care. Animal surgery and post mortem analyses were performed essentially as described previously [17–19]. Founder mice heterozygous for insertion of Cre recombinase in the gene encoding mouse mast cell Cpa3 (Cpa3Cre/+ mice on the C57BL/6 background) were obtained from the German Cancer Research Center, DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany. A colony was established by mating with WT C57BL/6 mice (Charles River Laboratories, Senneville, Qc H9X 3R3, Canada) and the offspring genotyped as described [16] using PCR of DNA isolated from ear punch biopsies. Cpa3Cre/+ mast cell-deficient male and female offspring were separated and 3–4 mice/cage maintained with free access to food and water from 4.5 to 8 months prior to surgical intervention.
Surgical model
Adult male and female mice were used for all experiments. Bilateral 1 mm x 2 mm defects were generated on the anterolateral aspect of the femora using the third trochanter as an anatomical landmark. Mice were anesthetized with isoflurane before shaving both hind limbs, disinfecting the skin with 70% ethanol and exposing the anterolateral aspect of the femora through a 3-mm skin incision extending from the third trochanter down the diaphysis. A 1 mm x 1 mm x 2 mm rectangular cortical window defect was generated with a 1 mm burr on Stryker drill (50,000 RPM, Hamilton, ON, Canada). After gentle irrigation to remove bone shards the muscle and skin layers were re-apposed and sutured with PDS-II 4–0 thread. For pain control, an IP injection of 10 mg/kg carprofen with 0.1 mg/kg buprenorphine in 0.5 mL of sterile saline was administered immediately after wound closure, and 5 mg/kg carprofen injected for 3 days post-operative. Cohorts of mice were euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation under anesthesia from 5–56 days post-operative. Femora were carefully dissected free of soft tissue before fixing for 24 hours in 4% paraformaldehyde. The bones were then rinsed x3 with sterile PBS and stored at 4o C until micro computed tomographic (micro CT) imaging.
Micro CT analysis
Scans were performed on a Skyscan 1172 instrument (Bruker, Kontich, Belgium) with a 0.5 mm aluminium filter at a voltage of 50kV, a current of 200μA and a resolution of 5 μm/pixel. 2D images were reconstructed into 3D models using NRecon software v.1.6.10.4 (Bruker) and loaded into CTAn software v.1.16.4.1 (Bruker) for analysis. Quantitative data was recorded for bone and vessel regeneration in rectangular regions of interest (ROI) in the Cortex opposite the defect, measuring 1.5 mm long, 0.9 mm wide and 0.6 mm in depth and in the Defect/Medulla measuring 1.5 mm long, 1.0 mm wide and 1.3 mm in depth. Quantitative data for mineralized tissue includes bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV %), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th. mm x10-3), trabecular separation (Tb.Sp. mm x10-3), open porosity (%) and open pore volume (Po.V Tot mm3). Quantitative data for vascular channels (Bruker micro CT academy 2016 v5.3) includes vascular channel volume/tissue volume (ChV/TV %), vascular channel number (Ch.N), vascular channel thickness (Ch.Th mm x10-3), and vascular channel connectivity density (Ch.Conn.Dn.).
Histological analysis
Bones were either left un-decalcified and embedded in poly-methyl methacrylate (PMMA) plastic or decalcified and embedded in paraffin using established methodology. Skin and bone tissues were stained for mast cells using acidified toluidine blue (aTB) and anti- tryptase antibody (Abcam, Cambridge MA, USA ab 151757 1:300). CD34 (Abcam ab23830 1:300) immunohistochemistry was used to identify vascular endothelial cells in bone and soft tissue in regenerating bone. Sections of PMMA embedded bones were stained with von Kossa and counterstained with toluidine blue (VK/TB) to distinguish mineralized from soft tissue. VK/TB stained sections were compared with 2D micro CT images from the same region, or with sections of decalcified, paraffin embedded bone stained to identify alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity in osteogenic cells. Tartrate resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) histochemical staining was used to identify osteoclasts and F4/80 (Abcam ab6640 1:200) immunohistochemistry to identify macrophages in decalcified bone sections. Microscopic images were captured with a Zeiss Axioskop 40 microscope (Carl Zeiss, Toronto, ON, Canada) and stain intensity expressed as % of the ROI using ImageJ v.1.6.0 software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).
Statistical analysis
Quantitative data is expressed as mean ± SD and the open source statistical program R v.3.3.0 (R Core Team, 2015) used for Wilcoxon sum-rank tests. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey post-hoc analysis were used for longitudinal and multiple comparisons between the different time points in the WT and Cpa3Cre/+mice. Differences were considered significant at p <0.05.
Results
Distribution of mast cells during bone repair
Mice were genotyped into Cpa3+/+ (mast cell proficient; WT) and Cpa3Cre/+ (mast cell deficient) littermates by PCR (Fig 1, panel A). Mast cells are normally distributed throughout the dermis [20]. Skin biopsies harvested from the backs of adult WT and Cpa3Cre/+mice were stained with aTB and for MC tryptase. Numerous aTB (Fig 1, panel B) and MC tryptase positive (Fig 1, panel D) cells were seen in the dermis, usually around hair follicles, in all WT (Fig 1, panel A) but not in Cpa3Cre/+ (Fig 1, panels C and E) mice. The same strategy was used to identify mast cells in sections of regenerating bone harvested from mice euthanized from 5d-56d PO. At 5d PO aTB positive cells were occasionally seen in WT mice on the periosteal surface of the proximal femur outside the region of the defect. At 14d PO they were seen in residual connective tissue in the defect/medulla of WT mice (Fig 1, panel B2) and in marrow, usually adjacent to vascular channels at 28d and 56d PO (Fig 1, panels B3 and B4). aTB positive cells were never seen in any of the bones harvested from Cpa3Cre/+ mice (Fig 1, panels C1 to C4). Quantitative data for mast cell staining, expressed as the number of aTB positive cells/mm2, is shown in Table 1. Non-granular, anti-tryptase antibody reactive cells of undefined lineage were seen in fibrous tissue at 5d and 14d PO in the defect/medulla of WT (Fig 1, panels D1 and D2) mice and occasionally in Cpa3Cre/+ (Fig 1, panels E1 and E2) mice. At 28d and 56d PO the distribution pattern of MC tryptase positive cells in WT mice resembled that of aTB positive cells, adjacent to bone and in the marrow next to vascular channels (Fig 1, panels D3 and D4). Tryptase positive cells were not seen in Cpa3Cre/+ bone at these times (Fig 1, panels E3 and E4).
Table 1. Quantitative staining analysis of cellular activity.
5 days postoperative | 14 days postoperative | 28 days postoperative | 56 days postoperative | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WT | Cpa3Cre/+ | p value | WT | Cpa3Cre/+ | p value | WT | Cpa3Cre/+ | p value | WT | Cpa3Cre/+ | p value | |
(n = 6–10) | (n = 7–9) | (n = 6–13) | (n = 7–10) | (n = 8–9) | (n = 8–10) | (n = 5–6) | (n = 5–9) | |||||
Cortex | ||||||||||||
aTB (#/mm2) | 0 | 0 | 1.000 | 0.4 ± 1.1b | 0 | 0.268 | 1.6 ± 1.3b | 0 | 0.001 | 0.7 ± 0.7b | 0 | 0.016 |
CD34 (%) | 0.35±0.20 | 0.24±0.21 | 0.309 | 0.69±0.35a | 0.70±0.28b | 0.942 | 0.80±0.19b | 1.31±0.26b | 0.002 | 0.63±0.18 | 1.02±0.28b | 0.046 |
ALP (%) | 2.22±1.08 | 2.25±1.98 | 0.970 | 5.09±1.34a | 6.59±2.48b | 0.090 | 7.41±2.19b | 5.98±2.13a | 0.192 | 9.08±3.02b | 7.64±2.98b | 0.410 |
TRAP (%) | 0.07±0.12 | 0.01±0.02 | 0.232 | 3.70±2.33b | 3.88±3.80b | 0.898 | 1.33±0.61 | 2.63±1.39a | 0.025 | 0.57±0.28 | 1.30±0.62a | 0.025 |
F4/80 (#/mm2) | 0.16±0.06 | 0.14±0.13 | 0.774 | 0.28±0.08 | 0.39±0.13a | 0.103 | 0.21±0.06 | 0.40±0.19a | 0.017 | 0.44±0.21a | 0.21±0.09 | 0.081 |
Defect/Medulla | ||||||||||||
aTB (#/mm2) | 0 | 0 | 1.000 | 10.0 ± 5.9b | 0 | <0.001 | 8.0 ± 3.4b | 0 | <0.001 | 4.9 ± 4.1b | 0 | 0.005 |
CD34 (%) | 0.31±0.31 | 0.14±0.10 | 0.161 | 0.87±0.40b | 0.92±0.57b | 0.810 | 0.27±0.09 | 0.45±0.18a | 0.035 | 0.10±0.06 | 0.22±0.05 | 0.016 |
ALP (%) | 0.01±0.01 | 0.02±0.03 | 0.384 | 5.16±1.92b | 4.37±2.11b | 0.378 | 3.54±1.25b | 2.14±0.84a | 0.014 | 2.09±0.78a | 2.11±1.54a | 0.983 |
TRAP (%) | 0.35±0.44 | 0.01±0.02 | 0.047 | 5.56±2.99b | 3.68±2.13b | 0.122 | 1.10±0.63 | 1.63±0.85a | 0.161 | 0.29±0.15 | 0.82±0.30a | 0.002 |
F4/80 (#/mm2) | 0.72±0.51 | 0.36±0.29 | 0.171 | 3.59±1.24b | 2.27±0.67b | 0.047 | 4.03±0.74b | 2.96±0.64b | 0.009 | 3.05±0.49b | 3.38±0.76b | 0.486 |
aTB mast cells; CD34 vascular endothelial cells; ALP osteoblasts; TRAP osteoclasts; F4/80 macrophages. Significantly different from 5 days postoperative
a p <0.05 and
b p <0.01.
Micro CT analysis of bone repair
2D micro CT images were reconstructed into 3D models in which new bone (white) is distinguished from pre-existing bone (dark grey) (Fig 2, panels A to H). A complex healing pattern was seen in the Cpa3Cre/+ mice that differed from that seen in the WT mice. At 14d PO less of the periosteal surface opposite the defect was covered with new bone in WT (Fig 2, panels B and C) mice than in Cpa3Cre/+ (Fig 2, panels F and G arrows) mice. By 56d PO, bridging of the defect was most often complete in WT (Fig 2, panel D) mice but remained incomplete with residual fibrous tissue in most Cpa3Cre/+ mice (Fig 2, panel H arrow). Quantitative analysis of bone regeneration in the cortex and defect/medulla ROIs is shown in Table 2. By 14d PO the WT mice had less cortical bone with wider spaces between trabeculae (Tb.Sp.) and increased bone porosity (Po.Vop; Po.op) compared with Cpa3Cre/+ mice, but with little difference in the defect/medulla. By 56d PO BV/TV was higher, with narrower spaces and less porosity, in WT than in Cpa3Cre/+ mice in both cortex and defect/medulla.
Table 2. Quantitative micro CT analysis of bone architecture.
5 days postoperative | 14 days postoperative | 28 days postoperative | 56 days postoperative | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WT | Cpa3Cre/+ | p value | WT | Cpa3Cre/+ | p value | WT | Cpa3Cre/+ | p value | WT | Cpa3Cre/+ | p value | |
(n = 7) | (n = 6) | (n = 16) | (n = 10) | (n = 8) | (n = 10) | (n = 6) | (n = 8) | |||||
Cortex | ||||||||||||
BV/TV % | 33.6±4.7 | 30.8±3.3 | 0.112 | 34.4±4.1 | 41.7±4.6b | <0.001 | 39.0±3.8b | 41.1±7.6b | 0.370 | 42.0±4.5b | 36.3±6.5 | 0.025 |
Tb.Th. (mm x10-3) | 20.7±2.0 | 19.2±1.2 | 0.031 | 17.7±2.4b | 16.8±2.0a | 0.242 | 17.1±2.7b | 16.00±2.6b | 0.001 | 18.0±1.9a | 16.4±2.5 | 0.133 |
Tb. Sp (mm x10-3) | 29.1±3.1 | 30.4±2.8 | 0.304 | 29.1±5.4 | 19.5±5.2b | 0.001 | 29.5±2.19 | 23.4±5.0b | 0.003 | 24.3±3.3b | 28.3±3.4 | 0.021 |
Po.Vop (mm3) | 0.54±0.04 | 0.56±0.03 | 0.117 | 0.54±0.05 | 0.47±0.06b | 0.001 | 0.49±0.04a | 0.48±0.06b | 0.601 | 0.47±0.04b | 0.56±0.06 | 0.002 |
Po.op % | 66.4±4.7 | 69.2±3.3 | 0.113 | 65.6±4.1 | 58.3±4.6 | 0.001 | 60.9±3.8b | 58.9±7.4 | 0.373 | 58.0±4.5b | 63.7±6.5 | 0.025 |
Defect/Medulla | ||||||||||||
BV/TV % | 0.95±0.73 | 0.53±0.69 | 0.163 | 9.23±6.16b | 8.44±5.39b | 0.660 | 22.9±8.4b | 16.3±6.5b | 0.018 | 22.6±4.5b | 16.8±7.09b | 0.032 |
Tb.Th. (mm x10-3) | 4.67±0.02 | 3.73±1.51 | 0.178 | 3.24±0.64b | 3.38±0.52 | 0.456 | 5.81±0.86b | 5.28±0.86b | 0.165 | 9.31±0.74b | 8.0±2.1b | 0.088 |
Tb. Sp (mmx10-3) | 59.7±3.1 | 61.7±1.8 | 0.075 | 28.5±10.3b | 29.9±14.4b | 0.707 | 20.5±5.6b | 21.7±4.5b | 0.584 | 25.1±4.0b | 30.7±4.6b | 0.016 |
Po.Vop (mm3) | 78.4±3.1 | 77.8±0.8 | 0.575 | 71.1±5.2b | 71.2±4.5 | 0.954 | 60.3±5.9b | 65.4±5.1 | 0.032 | 60.8±3.6b | 67.7±8.4a | 0.034 |
Po.(op) % | 99.0±0.75 | 99.4±0.83 | 0.239 | 90.9±6.0b | 91.6±5.5b | 0.683 | 76.3±8.6b | 82.5±6.9b | 0.031 | 75.3±5.8b | 83.3±7.5b | 0.010 |
BV/TV = bone volume/tissue volume; TbTh = trabecular thickness; TbSp. = trabecular separation; PoVop = open pore volume; Po(op) = open porosity. Significantly different from 5 days postoperative
a p <0.05 and
b p <0.01
A new algorithm developed by Bruker was used to quantify vessels (Fig 2, panels A1 to H1) in bone (Bruker micro CT academy 2016 v5.3). At 5d PO vessels were starting to penetrate the repair tissue from the proximal femur in WT mice but were not yet visible in Cpa3Cre/+ mice. By 14d PO there was a dramatic increase in vessels in both WT and Cpa3Cre/+ bones. Whereas the distribution pattern was even in WT mice it was skewed to the proximal pole leaving a distal area with no penetration (asterix) and few cortical vessels in Cpa3Cre/+ mice. By 56d PO the new vessels were effectively restricted to cortical bone. Quantitative analyses for new vessels is shown in Table 3. At 5d PO there were more vessels with a higher volume and better connectivity in WT than in Cpa3Cre/+ bone, and the number, volume and thickness remained higher at 56d PO. Images are representative of N = 7 WT and N = 6 Cpa3Cre/+ at 5d PO; N = 16 WT and N = 11 Cpa3Cre/+ at 14d PO; N = 8 WT and N = 10 Cpa3Cre/+ at 28d PO and N = 6 WT and N = 8 Cpa3Cre/+ at 56d PO.
Table 3. Quantitative micro CT analysis of bone vasculature.
5 days postoperative | 14 days postoperative | 28 days postoperative | 56 days postoperative | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WT | Cpa3Cre/+ | p value | WT | Cpa3Cre/+ | p value | WT | Cpa3Cre/+ | p value | WT | Cpa3Cre/+ | p value | |
(n = 7) | (n = 6) | (n = 16) | (n = 10) | (n = 8) | (n = 10) | (n = 6) | (n = 8) | |||||
Cortex | ||||||||||||
Ch.V/TV % | 0.43±0.4 | 0.26±0.2 | 0.264 | 9.8±5.8b | 11.2±4.8b | 0.482 | 2.04±1.7 | 4.5±2.4b | 0.003 | 1.73±0.8 | 1.83±1.1 | 0.814 |
Ch.N. | 0.33±0.3 | 0.11±0.09 | 0.103 | 2.6±1.3b | 3.21.6b | 0.201 | 0.61±0.4 | 1.04±0.4a | 0.021 | 0.37±0.1 | 0.43±0.2 | 0.331 |
Ch.Th. (mm x10-3) | 16.8±7.4 | 19.7±12.0 | 0.537 | 32.6±9.4b | 36.1±9.0b | 0.224 | 30.8±8.0b | 41.0±12.8b | 0.009 | 46.1±14.7b | 40.8±15.4b | 0.471 |
Ch.Conn.Dn. | 0.15±0.2 | 0.008±0.005 | 0.031 | 1.18±0.8b | 1.48±1.3b | 0.403 | 0.07±0.07 | 0.20±0.18 | 0.001 | 0.06±0.05 | 0.06±0.03 | 0.923 |
Defect/Medulla | ||||||||||||
Ch.V/TV % | 9.04±8.7 | 3.5±3.1 | 0.039 | 38.61±7.2b | 28.71±13.4b | 0.006 | 10.74±4.7 | 12.12±3.7a | 0.401 | 3.58±2.25 | 1.44±0.8 | 0.022 |
Ch.N. | 4.1±3.0 | 2.0±1.5 | 0.036 | 13.1±2.5b | 10.1±4.1b | 0.008 | 3.9±2.0 | 4.5±1.6a | 0.548 | 1.0±0.3a | 0.9±0.3 | 0.431 |
Ch.Th. (mm x10-3) | 19.3±6.9 | 18.0±3.2 | 0.667 | 31.1±2.8b | 25.9±7.4b | 0.007 | 28.6±8.8a | 27.9±5.9b | 0.801 | 35.6±16.2b | 23.1±5.8 | 0.039 |
Ch.Conn.Dn. | 1.69±1.5 | 0.5±0.4 | 0.031 | 8.62±3.6b | 6.1±3.1b | 0.019 | 1.19±1.1 | 1.5±0.9 | 0.452 | 0.33±0.2 | 0.21±0.1 | 0.115 |
Ch.V/TV % = channel volume/tissue volume; Ch.N. = channel number; Ch.Th. (mm x10-3) = channel thickness; Ch.Conn.Dn. = channel connectivity density. Significantly different from 5 days postoperative
a p <0.05 and
b p <0.01
The localization of vessels in regenerating bone was then compared with the results of CD34 immunohistochemistry, which was used as a sensitive marker for vascular endothelial cells in soft tissue and bone (Fig 3). At 5d and 14d PO there was an extensive network of vessels in the defect, medulla and cortex of WT bones, compared with the less dense pattern of vessel distribution seen in Cpa3Cre/+ bones. By 28d PO there were few CD34 positive cells in the medulla of WT mice compared with numerous cells embedded in fibrous tissue remaining in the defect and medulla of Cpa3Cre/+ bones (asterix). Quantification of CD34 staining, shown in Table 1, revealed peak activity at 14d PO in the defect/medulla and at 28d PO in the cortex of both WT and Cpa3Cre/+ bones, but with fewer vessels at 28d and 56d PO in the WT mice.
Histological analysis of bone repair
To further characterize the quality of regenerated bone we stained thin sections of un-decalcified bone harvested from the mid-saggital plane of the defect with von Kossa (Fig 4) to compare with 2D micro CT images. The morphological features seen in the 2D micro CT images (Fig 4, panels A to H) were reflected in the VK/TB stained histological sections. Residual shards of old bone (Fig 4, panels A and E arrows) were seen at 5d PO but no new bone was visible until 14d PO (Fig 4, panels B and F). Bridging of the defect was evident at 28d PO in WT but not in Cpa3Cre/+ mice (Fig 4, panel C vs G) in which significant fibrous tissue remained (Fig 4, panel G asterix). By 56D PO bone repair was effectively complete in most WT bones (Fig 4, panel D) compared with Cpa3Cre/+ bones, where the defect was filled with thin bone interspersed with fibrous tissue (Fig 4, panel H asterix). The spaces between old and new bone seen in the cortex at 28D were retained only in Cpa3Cre/+ bones (Fig 4, panel H arrows).
The cortical window defect is stable and therefore heals through intra-membranous bone formation, with no cartilage intermediate, so ALP is expressed only by anabolic cells of the osteoblast lineage. High magnification images of VK/TB and ALP stained sections from the corresponding region of the defect/medulla (Fig 5) revealed little bone forming activity at 5d PO in either WT (Fig 5A) or Cpa3Cre/+ (Fig 5, panel E) bones. At 14d PO there was an extensive network of new bone trabeculae at the proximal end of the defect and in the adjacent medulla, associated with intense ALP activity in both WT and Cpa3Cre/+ bone (Fig 5, panels B and F). At 28d and 56d PO there was more bone and less osteoid (blue) spanning the defect in WT (Fig 5, panel C) than in Cpa3Cre/+ (Fig 5, panel G) mice, while ALP activity appeared similar. Detailed examination of VK/TB staining in the cortex (Fig 6) revealed less pronounced fibrous periosteal tissue in WT (Fig 6, panel A) than Cpa3Cre/+ bone (Fig 6, panel E asterix) at 5d PO, prior to active bone formation at 14d PO when WT (Fig 6, panel B) and Cpa3Cre/+ (Fig 6, panel B and F) bones looked similar. At 28d and 56d PO the cortex of WT bones (Fig 6, panels C and D) had fewer lacunae and less osteoid than of Cpa3Cre/+ bones (Fig 6, panels G and 6).
Adjacent sections of decalcified bone were stained with TRAP to identify osteoclasts or with F4/80 antiserum to identify macrophages (Fig 7). TRAP positive cells were seen at the proximal end of the defect and in the fibrous tissue filling the defect at 5d PO in WT bones (Fig 7, panel A) but not in Cpa3Cre/+ bones (Fig 7, panel B). Peak TRAP activity occurred at 14d PO and was more intense in WT (Fig 7, panel C) than in Cpa3Cre/+ bones (Fig 7, panel D), whereas it declined at 28d PO in WT (Fig 7, panel E) but not in Cpa3Cre/+ bones (Fig 7, panel F). F4/80 staining was prominent in connective tissue of WT (Fig 7, panel A1) and Cpa3Cre/+ (Fig 7, panel B1) bones at 5d PO. By 14d PO prominent staining was seen adjacent to bone in WT (Fig 7, panel C1) but not in Cpa3Cre/+ (Fig 7, panel D1) bones, where F4/80 positive cells remained scattered in connective tissue. By 28d PO the F4/80 positive cells were seen in marrow adjacent to bone in WT mice (Fig 7, panel E1) and persisted in fibrous tissue in Cpa3Cre/+ bone (Fig 7, panel F1). Quantitative analyses for ALP, TRAP and F4/80 staining (Table 1) confirmed similar patterns for ALP in WT and Cpa3Cre/+ bones throughout the healing period, as well as higher TRAP activity in WT bone at 5d PO followed by lower levels than in Cpa3Cre/+ bones at later time points. F4/80 immunoreactivity was generally similar except for transient reductions in Cpa3Cre/+ bones at 14d and 28d PO.
Discussion
The goal of the current study was to characterize the impact of mast cell deficiency on the repair of cortical bone defects using adult mast cell-deficient Cpa3Cre/+ mice. The Cpa3Cre/+ strain is constitutively devoid of mast cells in connective and mucosal tissues and it has no known alterations in other cell lineages involved in bone repair. In WT but not in Cpa3Cre/+ mice mast cells appeared in the repair tissue from 14d to 56d PO. Interestingly, bridging of the bone defect was complete in all (6/6) WT mice at 56d PO but only 3/8 Cpa3Cre/+ mice. This incomplete bridging was associated with disruption of re-vascularization and impaired bone mineralization. Osteoclast activity was reduced in Cpa3Cre/+ mice in the early phase of repair but increased at later stages, with no clear differences in macrophage activity. Taken together, the results indicate that mast cells have a positive impact on bone repair that is mediated in part by recruitment of vascular endothelial cells, as also suggested by the previous work of Boesiger et al (1998) [21], and in part by altered metabolism of newly formed bone. It was proposed more than two decades ago that mast cells are involved in tissue digestion and re-vascularization, which are early and essential steps in the bone healing cascade [9]. Mast cells reside over the long term in connective tissues where they are available locally and for potential trafficking via the vascular and lymphatic systems to sites of tissue injury and repair [22]. The surgical intervention used in this study would have temporarily disrupted existing hind limb vessels and caused local ischemia and hypoxia, which are the major stimuli for re-vascularization [23]. Mast cells, identified by the use of metachromatic staining with aTB, were first seen in WT bone at 5d PO, which was the earliest time at which the soft callus could be preserved intact for histological analyses. At this time they were localized adjacent to vessels in muscle, in bone marrow of the femur proximal to the site of injury, and at the periosteal junction between soft tissue and bone. The appearance of aTB positive cells at the proximal, rather than distal, end of the femur suggests they migrated to the wound from soft tissue stores via the arterial or lymphatic vessels that supply the hind limb. This conjecture was supported by micro CT analyses of vessels in regenerating bone showing initiation of re-vascularization at 5d PO at the proximal end of the defect in WT bones. Quantitative analyses revealed peak numbers of aTB positive mast cells in the defect/medulla of WT bones at 14d PO, and in the cortex at 28d PO. This timeframe was supported by qualitative data showing MC tryptase positive cells in bone marrow starting at 14d in WT but not Cpa3Cre/+ mice. Peak numbers of mast cells in regenerating bone coincided with peak numbers of vessels visualized by micro CT and with CD34 immunostaining of vascular endothelial cells.
Degranulation or secretion of factors by aTB positive mast cells would result in local release of angiogenic mediators like heparin, angiogenin, vascular endothelial growth factor and matrix metalloproteinases in WT mice [24]. Given their lack of mast cells these mediators would be absent in Cpa3Cre/+ mice, which could have accounted for the delay and disorganization of bone re-vascularization as evidenced by micro CT. In this and other studies of bone repair we have used CD34 as a sensitive marker of endothelial cells, but it is also expressed on MSC, fibrocytes and other precursor cells capable of differentiating down the osteogenic lineage [25]. In the current work CD34 cells were clearly organized into vascular channels in the condensed mesenchyme in defect/medulla and the cortex at 5d PO prior to bone formation. Consistent with delayed healing, CD34 cells persisted in the Cpa3Cre/+ mice in the periosteum and in residual fibrous tissue in the defect/medulla at 56d PO, when re-vascularization was effectively complete in WT mice. The absence of clearly defined channels and the location of CD34 positive cells at 56d PO suggest the cells were not endothelial cells but rather fibrocytes in the periosteum, or MSC that were unable to differentiate into bone-forming osteoblasts in the absence of mast cell mediators. The current literature identifies bone active agents like platelet derived growth factor, fibroblast growth factors, transforming growth factor and tumor necrosis factor, as well as matrix metalloproteinases as pre-formed components of stored granules that are released upon mast cell activation [22, 26]. After 14d PO mast cells were present in close proximity to vessel in the defect/medulla of WT mice but absent from Cpa3Cre/+ mice. The absence of mast cell derived bone active agents could have impaired mineralization of newly formed bone at 14d and 28d PO despite similar levels of alkaline phosphatase activity in osteoblasts (Figs 6 and 7). Furthermore, the absence of carboxypeptidase A, which is a major constituent of mast cell granules that targets the vasoconstrictor endothelin [27, 28] could have resulted in excess endothelin-1 mediated vasoconstriction, increased oxidative stress and altered bone cell function [28].
The importance of an adequate periosteal reaction to bone healing is emphasized by the current widespread use of vascularised fibular periosteal grafts to promote healing of large bone defects [29, 30] and in cell-based bone tissue engineering [31]. Prior to skeletal maturity the periosteum is thick and highly vascular, with active osteoblasts depositing intramembranous bone to increase the external diameter of growing long bones [32]. The absence of mast cells in Cpa3Cre/+ mice resulted in thickening of the periosteum, similar to that seen in adult FGFR3-null mice [33], and suggests an imbalance in FGF signaling might be involved in impaired bone regeneration in the Cpa3Cre/+ mice. However, the similarity in ALP activity between WT and Cpa3Cre/+ mice supports the hypothesis that the impairment was not mediated at an early stage of osteoblast differentiation.
The two principle cells responsible for catabolic activity in bone are osteoclasts and macrophages. Apart from being phagocytes the lineages appear to share little in common. Osteoclast activity is restricted to digestion of mineralized tissue in cartilage and bone whereas macrophages have been implicated in inflammatory disorders and fibrosis of most if not all major organs, including the brain. In our previous work that characterized bone repair in KitW-sh mast cell deficient mice osteoclast activity was shown to be elevated throughout the bone healing cascade [18]. This was not the case in the current study in which osteoclast activity was reduced in Cpa3Cre/+ mice up to 14d PO and elevated thereafter compared with WT mice. A simple explanation for the discrepancy is that Kit is expressed on osteoclasts and their precursors, as well as mast cells, whereas Cpa3 expression is restricted to mast cells. Osteoclasts are considered to be tissue specific macrophages, distinct from bone marrow macrophages and “osteomacs” located on the periosteal and endosteal surface of resting bone [34]. Using F4/80 immunostaining to identify all macrophages in healing bone it was surprising to find the lowest levels of expression during the inflammatory phase of repair at 5d PO, with an approximate 5-fold increase thereafter in both WT and Cpa3Cre/+ mice. The relatively low abundance of macrophages under healing conditions in the absence of mast cells in Cpa3Cre/+ mice in the current study, and previously in KitW-sh mice, suggests an interdependence between the two lineages. This conjecture is further supported by the increase in both mast cells and macrophages in bone defects in WT mice administered lipopolysaccharide (LPS) [35]. The timeframe and pattern of distribution of F4/80 positive cells in the current study closely resembled that of “osteomacs” in a similar model of cortical bone repair [36]. Given the proposed anabolic function of these cells in bone mineralization [37], their relative short supply in Cpa3Cre/+ bone might explain the increase in osteoid compared with WT bone at 14d and 28d PO. Taken together the data suggest a functional relationship exists between mast cells, macrophages and MSC in the bone micro-environment that warrants further investigation. Only few suggested mast cell functions have been confirmed in studies using Kit-independent models of mast cell deficiency. Thus, the impairment of bone fracture healing in mice in the absence of mast cells appears to be a remarkable, largely unanticipated, non-immunological mast cell function.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Chan Gao and Yazeed Al Saran with surgery. The Bone Engineering Labs are supported in part by the Fonds de Recherche Santé Quebec- Réseau de Recherche en Santé Buccodentaire et Osseuse (FRSQ-RSBO) and the Jo Miller Orthopaedic Fund. JRGL is a scholar of the Mexican National Council for Science and Technology (CONACYT), RS by a bursary from McGill Faculty of Medicine, TW by a studentship from FRSQ-RSBO and PAM is a Chercheur boursier clincien Junior 2 of the FRSQ. TBF and HRR were funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB Transregio 156.
The work was performed in the Bone Engineering Labs of the Research Institute-McGill University Health Centre, which is an FRSQ—sponsored Centre de Recherche.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
The Bone Engineering Labs are supported in part by the Fonds de Recherche Santé Quebec- Réseau de Recherche en Santé Buccodentaire et Osseuse (FRSQ-RSBO, http://www.rsbo.ca/) and the Jo Miller Orthopaedic Fund. Jose Ramirez-GarciaLuna is a scholar of the Mexican National Council for Science and Technology (CONACYT, http://www.conacyt.gob.mx/), Robert Samberg by a bursary from McGill Faculty of Medicine, Timothy H. Wong by a studentship from Fonds de Recherche Santé Quebec- Réseau de Recherche en Santé Buccodentaire et Osseuse, and Paul A Martineau is a Chercheur boursier clincien Junior 2 of the Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec (http://www.frqs.gouv.qc.ca/en/, funding reference number 24813). Thorsten B Feyerabend and Hans-Reimer Rodewald were funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (http://www.dfg.de/en/, SFB Transregio 156). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Vortkamp A, Pathi S, Peretti GM, Caruso EM, Zaleske DJ, Tabin CJ. Recapitulation of signals regulating embryonic bone formation during postnatal growth and in fracture repair. Mech Develop. 1998;71:65–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lorenzo J, Choi Y, Horowitz M, Takayanagi H, Schett G. The developing field of osteoimmunology In: Lorenzo J, editor. Osteoimmunology. UK: Elsevier; 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Einhorn T. Clinically applied models of bone regeneration in tissue engineering research. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1999;367:S59–S67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rodewald H, Dessing M, Dvorak A, Galli S. Identification of a committed precursor for the mast cell lineage. Science. 1996;271:818–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dahlin J, Heyman B, Hallgren J. Committed mast cell progenitors in mouse blood differ in maturity between Th1 and Th2 strains. Allergy. 2013;68:1333–7. 10.1111/all.12223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dahlin J, Hallgren J. Mast cell progenitors: origin, development and migration to tissues. Mol Immunol. 2015;63:9–17. 10.1016/j.molimm.2014.01.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Blair R, Meng H, Marchese M, Ren S, Schwartz L, Tonnesen M. Human mast cells stimulate vascular tube formation. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:2691–700. 10.1172/JCI119458 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Moon T, Befus A, Kulka M. Mast cell mediators: their differential release and secretory pahways involved. Frontiers in Immunology. 2014;5:569 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Banovac K, Renfree K, Malowski A, Latta L, Altman R. Fracture healing and mast cells. J Orthop Trauma. 1995;9:482–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cindik E, Maurer M, Hanna M, Muller R, Hayes W, Hovy L, et al. Phenotypical characterization of c-kit receptor deficient mouse femora using non-destructive high resolution imaging techniques and biomechanical testing. Technology & Health Care. 2000;8:267–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rodewald H, Feyerabend T. Widespread immunological functions of mast cells: fact or fiction?. Immunity. 2012;37:13024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Grimbaldeston M, Chen C, Piliponsky A, Tsai M, Tam S, Galli S. Mast cell deficient W-sash c-kit mutant kitW-sh/W-sh mice as a model for investigating mast cell biology in vivo. Am J Pathol. 2005;167:835–48. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)62055-X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nigrovic P, Gray D, Jones T, Hallgren J, Kuo F, Chaletzky B, et al. Genetic inversion in mast cell deficient (Wsh) mice interrupts corin and manifests as hematopoietic and cardiac aberrancy. Am J Pathology. 2008;173:1693–701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Michel A, Schuler A, Friedrich P, Doner F, Bopp T, Radsak M, et al. Mast cell-deficient KitW-sh "sash" mutant mice display aberrant myelopoiesis leading to accumulation of splenocytes that act as myeloid-derived suppressor cells. J Immunology. 2013;190:5534–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Feyerabend T, Gutierrez D, Rodewald H. Of mouse models of mast cell deficiency and metabolic syndrome. Cell Metab. 2016;24:1–2. 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.06.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Feyerabend T, Weiser A, Tietz A, Stassen M, Harris N, Kopf M, et al. Cre-mediated cell ablation contests mast cell contribution in models of antibody and T-cell mediated autoimmunity. Immunity. 2011;35:832–44. 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.09.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gao C, Harvey E, Chua M, Chen B, Jiang F, Liu Y, et al. MSC-seeded dense collagen scaffolds with bolus dose of VEGF promote healing of large bone defect E Cells & Materials. 2013;26:195–207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Behrends DA, Cheng L, Sullivan MB, Wang MH, Roby GB, Zayed N, et al. Defective bone repair in mast cell deficient mice with c-Kit loss of function. Eur Cell Mater. 2014;28:209–21; discussion 21–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Henderson J, Gao C, Harvey E, editors. Methods in bone biology: tissue isolation and manipulation New York: Springer; 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pasparakis M, Haas I, Nestle F. Mechanisms regulating skin immunity and inflammation. Nature Rev. 2014;14:289–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Boesiger J, Tsai M, Maurer M, Yamaguchi M, Brown LF, Claffey KP, Dvorak HF, Galli SJ. Mast cells can secrete vascular permeability factor/ vascular endothelial cell growth factor and exhibit enhanced release after immunoglobulin E-dependent upregulation of fc epsilon receptor I expression. J Exp Med. 1998;188(6):1135–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kunder C, StJohn A, Abraham S. Mast cell moulation of the vascular and lymphatic endothelium. Blood. 2011;118:5383–93. 10.1182/blood-2011-07-358432 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Simons M. Angiogenesis: where do we stand now. Circulation. 2005;111:1556–66. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000159345.00591.8F [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Theoharides T, Alsandratos K, Angelidou A, Delivanis D, Sismanopoulos N, Zhang B, et al. Mast cells and inflammation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1822:21–33. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2010.12.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sidney L, Branch M, Dunphy S, Dua H, Hopkinson A. Concise review: evidence for CD34 as a common marker for diverse progenitors. StemCells. 2014;32:1380–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Antebi B, Zhang L, Sheyn D, Pelled G, Zhang X, Gazit Z, et al. Controlling arteriogenesis and mast cells are central to bioengineering solutions for critical bone defect repair using allografts. Bioengineering. 2016;3:3390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Schneider L, Schlenner S, Feyerabend T, Wunderlin M, Rodewald H. Molecular mechanism of mast cell mediated innate defense aganist endothelin and snake venom sarafotoxin. J Exp Med. 2007;204:2629–39. 10.1084/jem.20071262 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pejler G, Knight S, Henningsson F, Wernersson S. Novel insights into the biological function of mast cell carboxypeptidase A. Trands in Immunol. 2009;30:401–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lemos-Azi M, Aprato A, Santi I, Kfuri M, Masse A, Joeris A. Autologous bone graft in the treatment of post-traumatic bone defects: a ststematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2016;17:465 10.1186/s12891-016-1312-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Soldado F, Fontecha C, Barber I, Velez R, Llusa M, Collado D, et al. Vascularized fibular periosteal graft: a new technique to enhance bone union in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012;32:308–13. 10.1097/BPO.0b013e31824b2843 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.vanGastel N, Stegen S, Stockmans I, Moermans K, Schrooten J, Graf D, et al. Expansion of murine periosteal progenitor cells with fibroblast growth factor 2 reveals an intrinsic endochondral ossification program mediated by bone morphogenetic protein 2. Stem Cells. 2014;32:2407–18. 10.1002/stem.1783 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bisseret D, Kaci R, Lafage-Proust M, Alison M, Parlier-Cuau C, Laredo J, et al. Periosteum: characteristic imaging findings with emphasis on radiologic-pathologic findings. Skeletal Radiol. 2015;44:321–38. 10.1007/s00256-014-1976-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Valverde-Franco G, Liu H, Davidson D, Chai S, Valderrama-Carvajal H, Goltzman D, et al. Defective bone mineralization and osteopenia in young adult FGFR3-/- mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13(3):271–84. 10.1093/hmg/ddh034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chang M, Raggatt L, Alexander K, Kuliwaba J, Fazzalari N, Schroder K, et al. Osteal tissue macrophages are intercalated throughout human and mouse bone lining tissues and regulate osteoblast function in vitro and in vivo. J Immunol. 2008;181:1232–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Behrends D, Hui D, Gao C, Awlia A, Al-Saran Y, Li A, et al. Defective bone repair in C57Bl6 mice with systemic inflammation. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2016;In Press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Alexander K, Chang M, Maylin E, Kholer T, Muller R, Wu A, et al. Osteal macrophages promote in vivo intramembranous bone healing in a mouse tibial injury model. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26:1517–32. 10.1002/jbmr.354 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Raggatt L, Wullschleger M, Alexander K, Wu A, Millard S, Kaur S, et al. Fracture healing via periosteal callus formation requires macrophages for both initiation and progression of early endochondral ossification. Am J Pathology. 2014;184:3192–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.