There are errors in Tables 3 and 4, and corresponding errors in the Results section under the subheading “Factors correlated with HIV infection of MSWs and ncMSM.” Please see the corrected Tables 3 and 4 here.
Table 3. Estimated HIV risk/prevention behavior in MSWs and ncMSM.
| MSWs (n = 489) | ncMSM (n = 476) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COR (95%CI) | P | AOR (95%CI) | P | COR (95%CI) | P | AOR (95%CI) | P | |
| Syphilis infection | 10.2 (2.9,35.5) | 0.000 | 9.0 (2.4,33.5) | 0.001 | 5.6 (3.3,9.6) | 0.000 | 5.9 (3.2,10.9) | 0.000 |
| Ever diagnosed with STIs | 12.1 (1.2,124,3) | 0.036 | 13.9 (1.5,134.6) | 0.045 | 1.0 (0.5,2.3) | 0.911 | 1.3 (0.5,3.4) | 0.557 |
| Tested for HIV | 3.4 (1.2–9.8) | 0.026 | 2.8 (0.7,11.1) | 0.152 | 0.4 (0.2,0.6) | 0.000 | 0.4 (0.2,0.7) | 0.001 |
| Condom use with male sex partner | 0.3 (0.1,0.8) | 0.022 | 0.3 (0.1,0.9) | 0.046 | 0.8 (0.5,1.4) | 0.488 | 0.7 (0.4,1.5) | 0.485 |
| Anal sex role (both) | 9.2 (1.9,43.8) | 0.006 | 3.6 (0.4,32.3) | 0.251 | 0.7 (0.3,1.4) | 0.323 | - | - |
| Younger in age(<20) | 0.3 (0.1,1.6) | 0.179 | 0.3 (0.1,2.6) | 0.280 | 0.6 (0.4,0.9) | 0.048 | 0.6 (0.3,1.2) | 0.181 |
| Lower education (Junior high school or less) | 2.1 (0.3,17.3) | 0.491 | 7.6 (0.4,160.9) | 0.191 | 2.6 (1.4,4.7) | 0.002 | 2.1 (1.0,4.2) | 0.049 |
| First sex partner (male) | 1.1 (0.3,3.4) | 0.921 | 5.2 (0.9,31.7) | 0.072 | 2.1 (1.3,3.4) | 0.003 | 2.1 (1.2,3.9) | 0.014 |
OR, odds ratio
COR, crude OR
Variables included in the multiple logistic regression model: HIV/syphilis infection, age, education, sex role, history of HIV test, history of STIs, condom use, first sex partner
AOR, adjusted OR, adjusted for other variables listed in the text
STI, sexually transmitted infection
Significant results are in bold (P<0.05)
Table 4. Factors correlated with combined HIV infection.
| Characteristics | HIV+/total | Univariate | Adjusted for MSM type | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95%CI) | P | OR (95%CI) | P | ||
| Syphilis-positive | |||||
| No | 55/860 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 39/105 | 8.6 (5.3,14.0) | 0.000 | 6.1 (3.7,10.1) | 0.000 |
| Ever diagnosed with STIs | |||||
| No | 85/915 | 1 | NS | ||
| Yes | 9/50 | 2.1 (1.0,4.6) | 0.048 | NS | |
| Age, years | |||||
| <20 | 2/23 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 20–29 | 36/639 | 0.6 (0.1,2.7) | 0.539 | NS | |
| ≥30 | 56/303 | 2.3 (0.5,10.4) | 0.250 | NS | |
| Education | |||||
| Junior high school or less | 32/219 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Senior high school | 41/448 | 0.6 (0.4,0.9) | 0.035 | NS | |
| College or above | 21/298 | 0.4 (0.2,0.8) | 0.006 | 0.3 (0.2,0.5) | 0.000 |
| Employment | |||||
| Full-time employed | 80/848 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Unemployed/part-time/retired | 12/104 | 1.3 (0.7,2.4) | 0.494 | NS | |
| Student | 2/13 | 1.7 (0.4,8.0) | 0.474 | NS | |
| Monthly income, RMB | |||||
| ≤3000 | 24/174 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3001–5000 | 49/402 | 0.9 (0.5,1.5) | 0.595 | NS | |
| >5000 | 21/389 | 0.4 (0.2,0.7) | 0.001 | NS | |
| Marital status | |||||
| Unmarried | 64/810 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Married | 30/155 | 2.8 (1.7,4.5) | 0.000 | NS | |
| Sexual orientation | |||||
| Gay | 54/631 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Biosexual | 26/147 | 2.3 (1.4,3.8) | 0.001 | 1.8 (1.1,3.0) | 0.033 |
| Heterosexual or unsure | 14/187 | 0.9 (0.5,1.6) | 0.641 | NS | |
| Anal sex role | |||||
| Insertive only | 32/406 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Receptive only | 13/90 | 1.9 (0.9,3.9) | 0.053 | NS | |
| Both | 49/469 | 1.4 (0.9,2.2) | 0.217 | NS | |
| Gender of first sexual partner | |||||
| Female | 41/285 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Male | 53/680 | 0.5 (0.3,0.7) | 0.002 | 0.5 (0.3,0.8) | 0.005 |
| Age at sex debut, years | |||||
| ≤18 | 15/196 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 19–25 | 58/653 | 1.2 (0.6,2.1) | 0.591 | NS | |
| ≥26 | 21/115 | 2.7 (1.3,5.4) | 0.006 | NS | |
| Male sex partner1 | |||||
| 0 | 17/229 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1 | 18/200 | 1.2 (0.6,2.5) | 0.552 | NS | |
| >1 | 59/536 | 1.5 (0.9,2.7) | 0.132 | NS | |
| Female sex partner1 | |||||
| 0 | 85/865 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1 | 8/53 | 1.6 (0.7,3.5) | 0.222 | NS | |
| >1 | 1/47 | 0.2 (0.1,1.5) | 0.113 | NS | |
| Had one-night stand with male partner1 | |||||
| No | 29/364 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 65/601 | 1.4 (0.9,2.2) | 0.148 | NS | |
| Group sex1 | |||||
| No | 81/873 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 13/92 | 1.6 (0.9,3.0) | 0.135 | NS | |
| Condom use with male sex partner1 | |||||
| No | 25/217 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 69/748 | 0.8 (0.5,1.3) | 0.315 | NS | |
| Condom use with female sex partner1 | |||||
| No | 87/892 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 7/73 | 0.9 (0.4,2.2) | 0.964 | NS | |
| Ever used illicit drugs | |||||
| No | 64/648 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 30/317 | 1.0 (0.6,1.5) | 0.839 | NS | |
| Had a previous HIV test | |||||
| No | 51/543 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 43/422 | 1.1 (0.7,1.7) | 0.679 | 0.5 (0.3,0.8) | 0.006 |
1Within 6 months
OR, odds ratio
NS, not significant
The last sentence of the first paragraph of the Results section under the subheading “Factors correlated with HIV infection of MSWs and ncMSM” should be: For ncMSM, syphilis infection (OR = 5.6; 95%CI: 3.3–9.6), receiving a lower education (Junior high school or less) (OR = 2.6; 95%CI: 1.4–4.7) and first sex with male partner (OR = 2.1; 95%CI: 1.3–3.4) were associated with HIV-positivity. Previous HIV testing (OR = 0.4; 95%CI: 0.2–0.6) and younger in age (<20) (OR = 0.6; 95%CI: 0.4–0.9) were negatively associated with HIV infection.
The last sentence of the second paragraph of the Results section under the subheading “Factors correlated with HIV infection of MSWs and ncMSM” should be: Syphilis infection (aOR = 5.9; 95%CI: 3.2–10.9), having a lower education (Junior high school or less) (aOR = 2.1; 95%CI: 1.0–4.2) and first sex with male partner (aOR = 2.1; 95% CI: 1.2–3.9) were positively associated with HIV infection in ncMSM, but having had an HIV test (aOR = 0.4; 95%CI: 0.2–0.7) was a protective factor.
The first sentence of the third paragraph of the Results section under the subheading “Factors correlated with HIV infection of MSWs and ncMSM” should be: In logistic regression analyses evaluating the risk factors for combined HIV infection (Table 4), syphilis infection, reporting ever having being diagnosed with STIs, people who are bisexual, age at sex debut (≥26) and being married were associated with HIV-positivity. After controlling for MSM type, syphilis infection and people who are bisexual were associated with an increased HIV infection.
Reference
- 1.Huang Y, Zhang Y, Li K, Zhao J (2016) Changes in Prevalence of HIV or Syphilis among Male Sex Workers and Non-Commercial Men Who Have Sex with Men in Shenzhen, China: Results of a Second Survey. PLoS ONE 11(12): e0167619 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167619 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
