Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2017 Mar 28;12(3):e0175017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175017

Correction: Changes in Prevalence of HIV or Syphilis among Male Sex Workers and Non-Commercial Men Who Have Sex with Men in Shenzhen, China: Results of a Second Survey

Yuanwei Huang, Yanting Zhang, Ke Li, Jin Zhao
PMCID: PMC5370141  PMID: 28350883

There are errors in Tables 3 and 4, and corresponding errors in the Results section under the subheading “Factors correlated with HIV infection of MSWs and ncMSM.” Please see the corrected Tables 3 and 4 here.

Table 3. Estimated HIV risk/prevention behavior in MSWs and ncMSM.

MSWs (n = 489) ncMSM (n = 476)
COR (95%CI) P AOR (95%CI) P COR (95%CI) P AOR (95%CI) P
Syphilis infection 10.2 (2.9,35.5) 0.000 9.0 (2.4,33.5) 0.001 5.6 (3.3,9.6) 0.000 5.9 (3.2,10.9) 0.000
Ever diagnosed with STIs 12.1 (1.2,124,3) 0.036 13.9 (1.5,134.6) 0.045 1.0 (0.5,2.3) 0.911 1.3 (0.5,3.4) 0.557
Tested for HIV 3.4 (1.2–9.8) 0.026 2.8 (0.7,11.1) 0.152 0.4 (0.2,0.6) 0.000 0.4 (0.2,0.7) 0.001
Condom use with male sex partner 0.3 (0.1,0.8) 0.022 0.3 (0.1,0.9) 0.046 0.8 (0.5,1.4) 0.488 0.7 (0.4,1.5) 0.485
Anal sex role (both) 9.2 (1.9,43.8) 0.006 3.6 (0.4,32.3) 0.251 0.7 (0.3,1.4) 0.323 - -
Younger in age(<20) 0.3 (0.1,1.6) 0.179 0.3 (0.1,2.6) 0.280 0.6 (0.4,0.9) 0.048 0.6 (0.3,1.2) 0.181
Lower education (Junior high school or less) 2.1 (0.3,17.3) 0.491 7.6 (0.4,160.9) 0.191 2.6 (1.4,4.7) 0.002 2.1 (1.0,4.2) 0.049
First sex partner (male) 1.1 (0.3,3.4) 0.921 5.2 (0.9,31.7) 0.072 2.1 (1.3,3.4) 0.003 2.1 (1.2,3.9) 0.014

OR, odds ratio

COR, crude OR

Variables included in the multiple logistic regression model: HIV/syphilis infection, age, education, sex role, history of HIV test, history of STIs, condom use, first sex partner

AOR, adjusted OR, adjusted for other variables listed in the text

STI, sexually transmitted infection

Significant results are in bold (P<0.05)

Table 4. Factors correlated with combined HIV infection.

Characteristics HIV+/total Univariate Adjusted for MSM type
OR (95%CI) P OR (95%CI) P
Syphilis-positive
No 55/860 1 1
Yes 39/105 8.6 (5.3,14.0) 0.000 6.1 (3.7,10.1) 0.000
Ever diagnosed with STIs
No 85/915 1 NS
Yes 9/50 2.1 (1.0,4.6) 0.048 NS
Age, years
<20 2/23 1 1
20–29 36/639 0.6 (0.1,2.7) 0.539 NS
≥30 56/303 2.3 (0.5,10.4) 0.250 NS
Education
Junior high school or less 32/219 1 1
Senior high school 41/448 0.6 (0.4,0.9) 0.035 NS
College or above 21/298 0.4 (0.2,0.8) 0.006 0.3 (0.2,0.5) 0.000
Employment
Full-time employed 80/848 1 1
Unemployed/part-time/retired 12/104 1.3 (0.7,2.4) 0.494 NS
Student 2/13 1.7 (0.4,8.0) 0.474 NS
Monthly income, RMB
≤3000 24/174 1 1
3001–5000 49/402 0.9 (0.5,1.5) 0.595 NS
>5000 21/389 0.4 (0.2,0.7) 0.001 NS
Marital status
Unmarried 64/810 1 1
Married 30/155 2.8 (1.7,4.5) 0.000 NS
Sexual orientation
Gay 54/631 1 1
Biosexual 26/147 2.3 (1.4,3.8) 0.001 1.8 (1.1,3.0) 0.033
Heterosexual or unsure 14/187 0.9 (0.5,1.6) 0.641 NS
Anal sex role
Insertive only 32/406 1 1
Receptive only 13/90 1.9 (0.9,3.9) 0.053 NS
Both 49/469 1.4 (0.9,2.2) 0.217 NS
Gender of first sexual partner
Female 41/285 1 1
Male 53/680 0.5 (0.3,0.7) 0.002 0.5 (0.3,0.8) 0.005
Age at sex debut, years
≤18 15/196 1 1
19–25 58/653 1.2 (0.6,2.1) 0.591 NS
≥26 21/115 2.7 (1.3,5.4) 0.006 NS
Male sex partner1
0 17/229 1 1
1 18/200 1.2 (0.6,2.5) 0.552 NS
>1 59/536 1.5 (0.9,2.7) 0.132 NS
Female sex partner1
0 85/865 1 1
1 8/53 1.6 (0.7,3.5) 0.222 NS
>1 1/47 0.2 (0.1,1.5) 0.113 NS
Had one-night stand with male partner1
No 29/364 1 1
Yes 65/601 1.4 (0.9,2.2) 0.148 NS
Group sex1
No 81/873 1 1
Yes 13/92 1.6 (0.9,3.0) 0.135 NS
Condom use with male sex partner1
No 25/217 1 1
Yes 69/748 0.8 (0.5,1.3) 0.315 NS
Condom use with female sex partner1
No 87/892 1 1
Yes 7/73 0.9 (0.4,2.2) 0.964 NS
Ever used illicit drugs
No 64/648 1 1
Yes 30/317 1.0 (0.6,1.5) 0.839 NS
Had a previous HIV test
No 51/543 1 1
Yes 43/422 1.1 (0.7,1.7) 0.679 0.5 (0.3,0.8) 0.006

1Within 6 months

OR, odds ratio

NS, not significant

The last sentence of the first paragraph of the Results section under the subheading “Factors correlated with HIV infection of MSWs and ncMSM” should be: For ncMSM, syphilis infection (OR = 5.6; 95%CI: 3.3–9.6), receiving a lower education (Junior high school or less) (OR = 2.6; 95%CI: 1.4–4.7) and first sex with male partner (OR = 2.1; 95%CI: 1.3–3.4) were associated with HIV-positivity. Previous HIV testing (OR = 0.4; 95%CI: 0.2–0.6) and younger in age (<20) (OR = 0.6; 95%CI: 0.4–0.9) were negatively associated with HIV infection.

The last sentence of the second paragraph of the Results section under the subheading “Factors correlated with HIV infection of MSWs and ncMSM” should be: Syphilis infection (aOR = 5.9; 95%CI: 3.2–10.9), having a lower education (Junior high school or less) (aOR = 2.1; 95%CI: 1.0–4.2) and first sex with male partner (aOR = 2.1; 95% CI: 1.2–3.9) were positively associated with HIV infection in ncMSM, but having had an HIV test (aOR = 0.4; 95%CI: 0.2–0.7) was a protective factor.

The first sentence of the third paragraph of the Results section under the subheading “Factors correlated with HIV infection of MSWs and ncMSM” should be: In logistic regression analyses evaluating the risk factors for combined HIV infection (Table 4), syphilis infection, reporting ever having being diagnosed with STIs, people who are bisexual, age at sex debut (≥26) and being married were associated with HIV-positivity. After controlling for MSM type, syphilis infection and people who are bisexual were associated with an increased HIV infection.

Reference


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES