Skip to main content
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment logoLink to Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
. 2017 Mar 22;13:899–908. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S130855

Association study of MIF promoter polymorphisms with suicide completers in the Japanese population

Naofumi Shimmyo 1, Akitoyo Hishimoto 1,, Ikuo Otsuka 1, Satoshi Okazaki 1, Shuken Boku 1, Kentaro Mouri 1, Tadasu Horai 1, Motonori Takahashi 2, Yasuhiro Ueno 2, Osamu Shirakawa 3, Ichiro Sora 1
PMCID: PMC5370383  PMID: 28367056

Abstract

Background

Numerous studies suggest that inflammation plays a key role in suicidal behavior. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), a proinflammatory cytokine, has received increasing attention in depression research. However, no study has investigated whether MIF has genetic involvement in completed suicide. In this study, we sought to explore the relationship between two functional polymorphisms on the MIF gene promoter (MIF-794CATT5–8 microsatellite and MIF-173G/C single-nucleotide polymorphism [SNP]) and completed suicide by using one of the largest samples of suicide completers ever reported.

Methods

The subjects comprised 602 suicide completers and 728 healthy controls. We genotyped MIF-794CATT5–8 microsatellite by polymerase chain reaction–based size discrimination assay and MIF-173G/C SNP by TaqMan® SNP genotyping assay. The allele-, genotype-, or haplotype-based association analyses between the suicide completers and the controls were carried out with the χ2 test, the Cochran–Armitage trend test, or Fisher’s exact test.

Results

Analyses of allele or genotype frequency distributions of the polymorphisms studied here did not reveal any significant differences between the suicide completers and the controls. Haplotype analysis also revealed no association with completed suicide.

Conclusion

To our knowledge, this is the first study that has examined the genetic association between MIF and completed suicide. Our results suggest that the effects of MIF-794CATT5–8 microsatellite and MIF-173G/C SNP on the MIF gene promoter might not contribute to the genetic risk of completed suicide in the Japanese population.

Keywords: MIF, suicide, microsatellite, SNP, haplotype, promoter region

Introduction

Suicide is a significant public health problem worldwide, with ~1 million suicides each year. A review of the literature showed that >2% of the current traffic accidents were suicide attempts, and this phenomenon may be underreported.1 The involvement of genetic factors in suicidal behavior is supported by family studies, twin and adoption studies, candidate gene analyses, and genome-wide association studies. Various studies have shown that numerous genes (eg, serotonin receptors and transporters, brain-derived neurotrophic factors [BDNF], or catechol-O-methyltransferase [COMT]) are linked to suicidal behavior, although conflicting reports exist.2,3 In addition, recent studies reported aberrant cytokine levels in blood, cerebrospinal fluid, and postmortem brain samples from suicidal completers.4 For instance, increased blood levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) are associated with suicidal ideation and attempt.5,6 Alternatively, mRNA and protein levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α were increased postmortem in the prefrontal cortexes of teenaged suicide completers.7

Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) is a pleiotropic cytokine involved in the regulation of innate and adaptive immunity.8 MIF was originally identified as a product of T-lymphocytes on the basis of its ability to prevent random migration of macrophages.9,10 MIF is secreted in response to inflammatory stimuli, including microbial products and glucocorticoids.11,12 Upon release, MIF acts in an autocrine and paracrine manner to promote proinflammatory cytokine production, eg, IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α.13,14 MIF has also been shown to facilitate DNA damage response and cell cycle regulation.15 In addition, MIF production has been discovered in many other nonimmune cells ubiquitously, being highly expressed in the liver, kidneys, anterior pituitary, and brain.8,16 It is reported that MIF expression in the brain was seen in neurons of the cortex, hypothalamus, hippocampus, cerebellum, and pons,17 and in astrocytes and the subgranular zone of the hippocampus.18 Increasing evidence suggests a role for MIF in depression.19 Deletion of MIF resulted in increased depressive behaviors in rodent models.18 In addition, several studies have explored MIF as a biomarker in major depressive disorder (MDD) and other mood disorders. Some studies have identified increased serum MIF both in patients with MDD and in healthy subjects with depressive symptoms.2022 Exhaustive serum proteomic profiling of MDD has identified MIF as one of the robust changed analytes in patients compared with controls.23,24 Furthermore, it has been established that MIF has an intricate relationship with the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis. For instance, Edwards et al25 found that elevated serum MIF was associated with depressive symptoms, reduced cortisol response to acute stress, and lower morning cortisol values. Alternatively, MIF was shown to specifically counteract the glucocorticoid-induced suppression of inflammatory cytokine secretion in activated macrophages (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α).12 The hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis has also gained interest as a neurobiological factor related to suicide, on the basis of the findings of studies investigating dexamethasone suppression test (DST) response, since nearly a 10-fold higher risk of completed suicide was found in DST nonsuppressors than in DST suppressors in a depressed cohort.2,26

From these findings, we hypothesized that MIF is involved in the genetic pathophysiology of suicide. The MIF gene promoter contains two functional variations: MIF-794CATT5–8 repeat (rs5844572) and MIF-173G/C single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) (rs755622), which have been well documented to affect the gene expression and protein levels of MIF.27,28 Indeed, many studies have examined the association between these two polymorphisms and various physical diseases.2934 However, no previous study has investigated the role of both these polymorphisms in suicidal behavior. Hence, we investigated the association of the two functional polymorphisms on the MIF promoter in suicide using the large sample size of 602 suicide completers and 728 controls.

Materials and methods

Subjects

This study was approved by the Ethical Committee for Genetic Studies of Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine. The study population consisted of 602 suicide completers (408 males: mean age ± standard deviation (SD), 51.0±17.4 years; 194 females: 50.7±18.8 years) and 728 unrelated healthy volunteers (340 males: mean age ± SD, 53.3±18.8 years; 388 females: 54.5±18.3 years). All subjects were ethnically Japanese.

Autopsies on suicide victims were conducted at the Department of Legal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine. The definition of suicide was based on the results of medicolegal examination and the police investigation as required by Japanese law. The methods of suicide were neck hanging (399), jumping from heights (100), gas suffocation (29), drowning (16), jumping in front of a vehicle (9), drug overdose (8), self-inflicted penetrating wounds (8), self-burning (3), taking poison (2), other methods (10), and unknown (18). We subdivided suicide completers into violent suicide (neck hanging, jumping from heights, gas suffocation, drowning, jumping in front of a vehicle, self-inflicted penetrating wounds, and self-burning) and nonviolent suicide (taking poison and drug overdose), according to Dumais et al.35 The healthy controls were recruited with consent after the purpose and procedures of the study were explained. The psychiatric assessment of each healthy participant was conducted as previously described.36,37 Briefly, none of them manifested psychiatric problems in unstructured interviews using unnamed symptom checklists based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th edition criteria by two psychiatrists. Demographics of suicide completers and healthy controls are shown in Table 1. Informed consent was obtained from all of the participants and from the families of the subjects used for postmortem blood experiments.

Table 1.

Demographics of suicide completers and healthy controls

Subjects Suicide
(n=602)
Control
(n=728)
Mean age ± SD 50.9±17.9 54.0±18.5
n (male:female) 408:194 340:388
Suicide methods
 Neck hanging 399
 Jumping from heights 100
 Gas suffocation 29
 Drowning 16
 Jumping in front of vehicles 9
 Drug overdosing 8
 Self-inflicted penetrating wounds 8
 Self-burning 3
 Taking poison 2
 Other 10
 Unknown 18

Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.

Blood and DNA sampling

Peripheral blood was obtained from all suicide completers and controls. Blood samples were stored at −80°C before use. DNA was extracted using the QIAamp DNA Blood Midi Kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA, USA). Each DNA sample was quantified and qualified using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA).

Genotyping for the MIF-794CATT5–8 repeat polymorphism (rs5844572)

Genomic DNA (100 ng) was subjected to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for one cycle at 95°C for 10 minutes, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 30 seconds, 55°C for 30 seconds, 72°C for 30 seconds and final extension at 72°C for 7 minutes. The forward primer was 5′-TTG-CAC-CTA-TCA-GAG-ACC-3′ labeled with a carboxyfluorescein fluorescent dye, and the reverse primer was 5′-TCC-ACT-AAT-GGT-AAA-CTC-G-3′. The 25 μL PCR reaction volume contained 100 ng of genomic DNA, 12.5 μL of AmpliTaq Gold 360 Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and 1.0 μL of forward and reverse primer. The amplification included an initial holding at 95°C for 10 minutes, followed by a three-step PCR program: 95°C for 30 seconds, 55°C for 30 seconds, and 40 cycles at 72°C for 30 seconds, and finally, 72°C for 7 minutes. The PCR product was appropriately diluted and supplemented with GeneScan 600 size standard (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The mixture was then separated on a 50-cm polyacrylamide gel at 15,000 V for 45 minutes on an ABI 3130 capillary sequencer and analyzed with GeneMapper® 4.0 software (Applied Biosystems). The PCR product sizes were 207 bp, 211 bp, and 215 bp in length, and these corresponded to 5-, 6-, and 7-CATT repeats, respectively. 8-CATT repeats were not observed in this study.

Genotyping for the MIF-173G/C SNP (rs755622)

We selected the predesigned TaqMan SNP genotyping assays from the Applied Biosystems database (http://www.appliedbiosystems.com) for the MIF-173G/C SNP (rs755622). Genotyping was performed with a 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

Statistics

We used the Haploview version 4.2 software program (http://www.broad.mit.edu/mpg/haploview) to determine the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium and allelic or haplotype frequencies for each of the MIF promoter polymorphisms.38 The allele-, genotype-, or haplotype-based association analyses between the suicide and control groups were carried out with the χ2 test, Cochran–Armitage trend test, or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate, using Haploview software, R version 3.1.0 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2014, Vienna, Austria) and Excel 2010 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) with the Statcel3 add-on (OMS, Saitama, Japan). The power analysis was performed with the PS v2.1.3.1 program.39 Statistical significance for the two MIF polymorphisms study was defined as two-tailed P<0.05/2=0.025.

Results

MIF-794CATT5–8 repeat and MIF-173G/C SNP analyses

No deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium was seen in suicide completers and healthy controls for both polymorphisms. The MIF-794CATT5–8 repeat genotype and allele frequencies are shown in Table 2. Neither the genotype distribution nor the allelic frequency of the polymorphism was significantly associated with completed suicide. The MIF-173G/C SNP genotype and allele frequencies in suicide completers and healthy controls are shown in Table 3. Neither the genotype distribution nor the allelic frequency of the SNP was significantly associated with completed suicide. Subgroup analyses based on sex difference or methods of suicide (violent or nonviolent) also yielded no significant findings (Tables S1S5).

Table 2.

Association of MIF-794CATT5–8 repeat with suicide completers and controls

Polymorphism Suicide
(n=602)
Control
(n=728)
P-valuea Global P-valueb OR (95% CI) Power
N Frequency N Frequency
MIF-794CATT5–8
Genotype
 55 86 0.143 105 0.145 0.943 0.409 0.99 (0.73–1.35) 0.050
 56 231 0.384 251 0.345 0.141 1.18 (0.95–1.48) 0.313
 57 77 0.128 95 0.130 0.889 0.98 (0.71–1.35) 0.051
 66 111 0.184 158 0.217 0.140 0.82 (0.62–1.07) 0.319
 67 83 0.138 93 0.128 0.587 1.09 (0.79–1.50) 0.084
 77 14 0.023 26 0.036 0.185 0.64 (0.33–1.24) 0.277
Allele
 CATT5 480 0.399 556 0.382 0.376 0.645 1.07 (0.92–1.25) 0.146
 CATT6 536 0.445 660 0.453 0.675 0.97 (0.83–1.13) 0.070
 CATT7 188 0.156 240 0.165 0.544 0.94 (0.76–1.15) 0.096

Notes:

a

Genotypic P-values and allelic P-values were tested with the χ2 test.

b

Global P-values were calculated by Fisher’s exact test.

Abbreviations: MIF, macrophage migration inhibitory factor; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Table 3.

Association of MIF-173 SNP with suicide completers and controls

Polymorphism Suicide
(n=602)
Control
(n= 728)
P-valuea Global P-valueb OR (95% CI) Power
N Frequency N Frequency
MIF-173G/C
Genotype
 GG 373 0.620 451 0.619 0.997 0.714 1.00 (0.83–1.21) 0.050
 GC 203 0.337 237 0.326 0.653 1.05 (0.84–1.33) 0.071
 CC 26 0.043 40 0.055 0.326 0.78 (0.47–1.29) 0.168
Allele
 G 949 0.788 1,139 0.782 0.711 0.97 (0.80–1.16) 0.066
 C 255 0.212 317 0.218

Notes:

a

Genotypic P-values and allelic P-values were tested with the χ2 test.

b

Global P-value was tested with the Cochran–Armitage test for trend.

Abbreviations: MIF, macrophage migration inhibitory factor; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

MIF promoter haplotype analyses

Linkage disequilibrium between each CATT repeat and the −173C was measured as follows: CATT5 and −173C: D’ =0.495, r2=0.043; CATT6 and −173C: D’ =0.871, r2=0.170; CATT7 and −173C: D’ =0.984, r2=0.678. The CATT7 and −173C polymorphisms were observed in strong linkage disequilibrium in our samples. We then examined whether the different haplotypes of the MIF-794CATT5–8 repeat and the MIF-173G/C SNP would show different distribution patterns in suicide completers compared with controls. The reconstructed frequencies of each possible haplotype based on the observed genotype data are shown in Table 4. There were six haplotypes in this study, none of which showed different distributions between suicide completers and controls. Subgroup analyses based on sex difference or methods of suicide (violent or nonviolent) also showed no significance (Tables S1S5).

Table 4.

Association of haplotypes of MIF promoter polymorphisms with suicide completers and controls

Haplotype Suicide
(n=602)
Control
(n=728)
P-valuea Global P-valueb OR (95% CI) Power
N Frequency N Frequency
Haplotype
 MIFCATT5-173G 427 0.355 496 0.341 0.442 0.631 1.06 (0.90–1.25) 0.118
 MIFCATT6-173G 522 0.433 641 0.440 0.716 0.97 (0.83–1.13) 0.065
 MIFCATT7-173G 4 0.003 1 0.001 0.129 4.14 (0.54–31.7) 0.229
 MIFCATT5-173C 53 0.044 60 0.041 0.746 1.06 (0.73–1.55) 0.068
 MIFCATT6-173C 14 0.012 19 0.013 0.802 0.92 (0.46–1.84) 0.055
 MIFCATT7-173C 184 0.153 239 0.164 0.426 0.92 (0.75–1.13) 0.096

Notes:

a

P-values were tested with the χ2 test.

b

Global P-value was calculated by Fisher’s exact test or Cochran–Armitage test for trend, as appropriate.

Abbreviations: MIF, macrophage migration inhibitory factor; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the association between suicide and two functional polymorphisms in the MIF gene promoter, which are known to affect the gene expression and protein levels of MIF. We also conducted subgroup analysis to investigate sex differences because males tend toward a higher suicide rate than females do among all age groups worldwide.40 Furthermore, we determined differences between violent and nonviolent suicides in this study because lethality associated with violent methods is considerably higher than that associated with nonviolent methods.41 Moreover, some previous studies showed differences between subjects with violent vs nonviolent methods of suicide in other polymorphisms (for the COMT and BDNF genes) related to completed suicide.42,43 As a result, no significant differences were found in any of the analyses, which indicated that MIF-794CATT5–8 repeat microsatellite and MIF-173G/C SNP are not associated with an increased risk of suicide in the Japanese population. Recent meta-analyses with MDD cases also failed to show the genetic involvement of MIF.44,45 Therefore, MIF might not be primarily involved in genetic susceptibility to suicide (and depression).

The limitations of the present study should be considered. First, the current sample provides low powers based on the observed frequencies of two polymorphisms. The number of subjects in the association study may not have been large enough to detect a significant difference, although our sample size of suicide completers was one of the largest ever reported. In fact, most previous candidate gene analyses and genome-wide association studies for completed suicide could not overcome the statistical limitation of small samples2,3,46 because it is extremely difficult to obtain tissue samples from suicide completers. Second, our study included only the Japanese population. The distribution of MIF polymorphisms determined by us was similar to that determined in the previous study for Japanese population by Llamas-Covarrubias et al,47 but not for Caucasian by Swanberg et al.48 Given that the MIF polymorphisms studied here differ among Caucasians, Africans, and Asians,49 our results might not be extrapolated to other populations. In addition, MIF protein levels in the brains of individuals displaying suicidal behavior should be further investigated to clarify the associations between MIF and suicide other than genetic susceptibility.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our results suggest that MIF-794CATT5–8 microsatellite and MIF-173G/C SNP microsatellite might not contribute to the genetic risk of completed suicide in the Japanese population.

Supplementary materials

Table S1.

Association of MIF promoter polymorphisms with suicide completers and controls for males

Polymorphism Male suicide
(n=408)
Male control
(n=340)
P-valuea Global P-valueb OR (95% CI) Power
N Frequency N Frequency
MIF-794CATT5–8
Genotype
 55 56 0.137 49 0.144 0.788 0.584 0.945 (0.625–1.429) 0.059
 56 159 0.390 119 0.350 0.263 1.186 (0.880–1.599) 0.193
 57 53 0.130 44 0.129 0.984 1.004 (0.654–1.542) 0.050
 66 77 0.189 77 0.226 0.204 0.795 (0.557–1.133) 0.256
 67 53 0.130 38 0.112 0.450 1.187 (0.761–1.850) 0.108
 77 10 0.025 13 0.038 0.279 0.632 (0.274–1.460) 0.194
Allele
 CATT5 324 0.397 261 0.384 0.601 0.875 1.057 (0.858–1.303) 0.080
 CATT6 366 0.449 311 0.457 0.733 0.965 (0.787–1.184) 0.061
 CATT7 126 0.154 108 0.159 0.815 0.967 (0.731–1.280) 0.058
MIF-173G/C
Genotype
 GG 252 0.618 218 0.641 0.507 0.753 0.904 (0.671–1.218) 0.100
 GC 136 0.333 102 0.300 0.330 1.167 (0.856–1.591) 0.154
 CC 20 0.049 20 0.059 0.553 0.825 (0.436–1.560) 0.097
Allele
 G 640 0.784 538 0.791 0.747 0.960 (0.748–1.231) 0.062
 C 176 0.216 142 0.209
Haplotype
 MIFCATT5-173G 283 0.347 234.1 0.344 0.920 0.769 1.011 (0.816–1.253) 0.052
 MIFCATT6-173G 357.4 0.438 300.6 0.442 0.875 0.984 (0.801–1.207) 0.053
 MIFCATT7-173G 2.1 0.003 0.1 0.000 0.208 17.54 (0.031–9.989) 0.000
 MIFCATT5-173C 41 0.050 26.9 0.040 0.320 1.284 (0.781–2.112) 0.132
 MIFCATT6-173C 8.6 0.011 10.4 0.015 0.413 0.686 (0.276–1.702) 0.111
 MIFCATT7-173C 123.9 0.152 107.9 0.159 0.715 0.949 (0.717–1.257) 0.067

Notes:

a

P-values were tested with the χ2 test.

b

Global P-value was calculated by Fisher’s exact test or Cochran–Armitage test for trend, as appropriate.

Abbreviations: MIF, macrophage migration inhibitory factor; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Table S2.

Association of MIF promoter polymorphisms with suicide completers and controls for females

Polymorphism Female suicide
(n=194)
Female control
(n=388)
P-valuea Global P-valueb OR (95% CI) Power
N Frequency N Frequency
MIF-794CATT5–8
Genotype
 55 30 0.155 56 0.144 0.741 0.850 1.084 (0.670–1.755) 0.066
 56 72 0.371 132 0.340 0.461 1.145 (0.799–1.639) 0.114
 57 24 0.124 51 0.131 0.793 0.933 (0.555–1.568) 0.055
 66 34 0.175 81 0.209 0.339 0.805 (0.517–1.255) 0.162
 67 30 0.155 55 0.142 0.678 1.108 (0.684–1.794) 0.072
 77 4 0.021 13 0.034 0.384 0.607 (0.195–1.888) 0.119
Allele
 CATT5 156 0.402 295 0.380 0.470 0.762 1.096 (0.854–1.407) 0.112
 CATT6 170 0.438 349 0.450 0.708 0.954 (0.746–1.219) 0.067
 CATT7 62 0.160 132 0.170 0.656 0.928 (0.667–1.290) 0.070
MIF-173G/C
Genotype
 GG 121 0.624 233 0.601 0.589 0.390 1.103 (0.774–1.572) 0.082
 GC 67 0.345 135 0.348 0.951 0.989 (0.688–1.420) 0.050
 CC 6 0.031 20 0.052 0.256 0.587 (0.232–1.487) 0.196
Allele
 G 309 0.796 601 0.774 0.394 1.139 (0.845–1.536) 0.089
 C 79 0.204 175 0.226
Haplotype
 MIFCATT5-173G 143.7 0.370 262.6 0.338 0.280 0.519 1.150 (0.892–1.483) 0.187
 MIFCATT6-173G 164.3 0.423 340.6 0.439 0.615 0.939 (0.734–1.201) 0.081
 MIFCATT7-173G 2.1 0.005 1.1 0.001 0.233 3.834 (0.380–38.62) 0.071
 MIFCATT5-173C 12.3 0.032 32.4 0.042 0.398 0.751 (0.385–1.465) 0.124
 MIFCATT6-173C 5.7 0.015 8.4 0.011 0.564 1.362 (0.467–3.975) 0.092
 MIFCATT7-173C 59.9 0.154 130.9 0.169 0.538 0.900 (0.645–1.256) 0.098

Notes:

a

P-values were tested with the χ2 test.

b

Global P-value was calculated by Fisher’s exact test or Cochran–Armitage test for trend, as appropriate.

Abbreviations: MIF, macrophage migration inhibitory factor; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Table S3.

Association of MIF promoter polymorphisms with violent suicide completers and controls

Polymorphism Violent suicide
(n=568)
Control
(n=728)
P-valuea Global P-valueb OR (95% CI) Power
N Frequency N Frequency
MIF-794CATT5–8
Genotype
 55 82 0.144 105 0.144 0.995 0.313 1.001 (0.733–1.368) 0.050
 56 220 0.387 251 0.345 0.114 1.201 (0.957–1.509) 0.329
 57 70 0.123 95 0.130 0.697 0.937 (0.673–1.303) 0.066
 66 105 0.185 158 0.217 0.153 0.818 (0.621–1.078) 0.309
 67 79 0.139 93 0.128 0.551 1.103 (0.799–1.522) 0.088
 77 12 0.021 26 0.036 0.122 0.583 (0.291–1.165) 0.387
Allele
 CATT5 454 0.400 556 0.382 0.357 0.554 1.078 (0.919–1.263) 0.152
 CATT6 509 0.448 660 0.453 0.791 0.979 (0.838–1.144) 0.057
 CATT7 173 0.152 240 0.165 0.387 0.910 (0.736–1.126) 0.148
MIF-173G/C
Genotype
 GG 355 0.625 451 0.620 0.840 0.542 1.024 (0.816–1.284) 0.054
 GC 190 0.335 237 0.326 0.734 1.041 (0.825–1.315) 0.063
 CC 23 0.040 40 0.055 0.230 0.726 (0.429–1.227) 0.250
Allele
 G 900 0.792 1,139 0.782 0.539 1.061 (0.878–1.283) 0.094
 C 236 0.208 317 0.218
Haplotype
 MIFCATT5-173G 406.8 0.358 496.7 0.341 0.369 0.547 1.077 (0.916–1.268) 0.145
 MIFCATT6-173G 494.8 0.436 640.9 0.440 0.812 0.981 (0.839–1.148) 0.055
 MIFCATT7-173G 4.1 0.004 1.2 0.001 0.113 4.391 (0.573–33.63) 0.057
 MIFCATT5-173C 47.2 0.042 59.3 0.041 0.915 1.021 (0.691–1.509) 0.052
 MIFCATT6-173C 14.2 0.013 19.1 0.013 0.900 0.952 (0.477–1.901) 0.050
 MIFCATT7-173C 168.9 0.149 238.8 0.164 0.286 0.890 (0.718–1.103) 0.184

Notes:

a

P-values were tested with the χ2 test.

b

Global P-value was calculated by Fisher’s exact test or Cochran–Armitage test for trend, as appropriate.

Abbreviations: MIF, macrophage migration inhibitory factor; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Table S4.

Association of MIF promoter polymorphisms with nonviolent suicide completers and controls

Polymorphism Nonviolent suicide
(n=10)
Control
(n=728)
P-valuea Global P-valueb OR (95% CI) Power
N Frequency N Frequency
MIF-794CATT5–8
Genotype
 55 1 0.100 105 0.144 0.692 0.890 0.659 (0.083–5.258) 0.037
 56 5 0.500 251 0.345 0.306 1.900 (0.545–6.626) 0.187
 57 1 0.100 95 0.130 0.776 0.740 (0.093–5.910) 0.036
 66 1 0.100 158 0.217 0.371 0.401 (0.050–3.188) 0.073
 67 2 0.200 93 0.128 0.498 1.707 (0.357–8.161) 0.152
 77 0 0.000 26 0.036 0.543
Allele
 CATT5 8 0.400 556 0.382 0.868 1.000 1.079 (0.438–2.656) 0.055
 CATT6 9 0.450 660 0.453 0.977 0.987 (0.406–2.396) 0.050
 CATT7 3 0.150 240 0.165 0.859 0.894 (0.260–3.075) 0.045
MIF-173G/C
Genotype
 GG 6 0.600 451 0.620 0.840 0.852 0.921 (0.258–3.294) 0.054
 GC 4 0.400 237 0.326 0.874 1.381 (0.386–4.941) 0.089
 CC 0 0.000 40 0.055 0.953
Allele
 G 16 0.800 1,139 0.782 0.935 1.113 (0.370–3.353) 0.047
 C 4 0.200 317 0.218
Haplotype
 MIFCATT5-173G 6.8 0.340 496.6 0.341 0.980 0.971 0.995 (0.392–2.526) 0.050
 MIFCATT6-173G 8.9 0.445 641.2 0.440 0.965 1.019 (0.419–2.476) 0.050
 MIFCATT7-173G 0.0 0.000 1.0 0.001 0.907
 MIFCATT5-173C 1.2 0.060 59.4 0.041 0.642 1.501 (0.233–9.675) 0.120
 MIFCATT6-173C 0.1 0.005 18.8 0.013 0.744 0.384 (0.001–195.1) 0.004
 MIFCATT7-173C 3.0 0.150 239.0 0.164 0.863 0.899 (0.261–3.090) 0.045

Notes:

a

P-values were tested with the χ2 test.

b

Global P-value was calculated by Fisher’s exact test or Cochran–Armitage test for trend, as appropriate.

Abbreviations: MIF, macrophage migration inhibitory factor; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Table S5.

Association of MIF promoter polymorphisms with violent and nonviolent suicide completers

Polymorphism Violent suicide
(n=568)
Nonviolent suicide
(n=10)
P-valuea Global P-valueb OR (95% CI) Power
N Frequency N Frequency
MIF-794CATT5–8
Genotype
 55 82 0.144 1 0.100 0.692 0.940 1.519 (0.190–12.15) 0.032
 56 220 0.387 5 0.500 0.469 0.632 (0.181–2.209) 0.134
 57 70 0.123 1 0.100 0.824 1.265 (0.158–10.13) 0.036
 66 105 0.185 1 0.100 0.492 2.041 (0.256–16.29) 0.031
 67 79 0.139 2 0.200 0.582 0.646 (0.135–3.099) 0.139
 77 12 0.021 0 0.000 0.642
Allele
 CATT5 454 0.400 8 0.400 0.998 1.000 0.999 (0.405–2.462) 0.050
 CATT6 509 0.448 9 0.450 0.986 0.992 (0.408–2.413) 0.050
 CATT7 173 0.152 3 0.150 0.978 1.018 (0.295–3.511) 0.049
MIF-173G/C
Genotype
 GG 355 0.625 6 0.600 0.871 0.932 1.111 (0.310–3.982) 0.056
 GC 190 0.335 4 0.400 0.664 0.754 (0.210–2.704) 0.085
 CC 23 0.040 0 0.000 0.516
Allele
 G 900 0.792 16 0.800 0.933 0.953 (0.316–2.878) 0.048
 C 236 0.208 4 0.200
Haplotype
 MIFCATT5-173G 406.0 0.357 6.8 0.340 0.858 0.973 1.080 (0.425–2.745) 0.050
 MIFCATT6-173G 494.6 0.435 8.9 0.445 0.932 0.962 (0.395–2.341) 0.051
 MIFCATT7-173G 4.3 0.004 0.0 0.000 0.800
 MIFCATT5-173C 48.0 0.042 1.2 0.060 0.666 0.691 (0.107–4.475) 0.121
 MIFCATT6-173C 14.4 0.013 0.1 0.005 0.760 2.555 (0.005–1.304) 0.003
 MIFCATT7-173C 168.7 0.149 3.0 0.150 0.988 0.988 (0.287–3.409) 0.051

Notes:

a

P-values were tested with the χ2 test.

b

Global P-value was calculated by Fisher’s exact test or Cochran–Armitage test for trend, as appropriate.

Abbreviations: MIF, macrophage migration inhibitory factor; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Number JP26461718). We thank Yasuko Nagashima for providing technical assistance.

Footnotes

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  • 1.Pompili M, Serafini G, Innamorati M, et al. Car accidents as a method of suicide: a comprehensive overview. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;223:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Oquendo MA, Sullivan GM, Sudol K, et al. Toward a biosignature for suicide. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;171:1259–1277. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.14020194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mirkovic B, Laurent C, Podlipski MA, Frebourg T, Cohen D, Gerardin P. Genetic association studies of suicidal behavior: a review of the past 10 years, progress, limitations, and future directions. Front Psychiatry. 2016;7:158. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ganança L, Oquendo MA, Tyrka AR, Cisneros-Trujillo S, Mann JJ, Sublette ME. The role of cytokines in the pathophysiology of suicidal behavior. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2016;63:296–310. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Janelidze S, Mattei D, Westrin Å, Träskman-Bendz L, Brundin L. Cytokine levels in the blood may distinguish suicide attempters from depressed patients. Brain Behav Immun. 2011;25:335–339. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2010.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.O’Donovan A, Rush G, Hoatam G, et al. Suicidal ideation is associated with elevated inflammation in patients with major depressive disorder. Depress Anxiety. 2013;30:307–314. doi: 10.1002/da.22087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pandey GN, Rizavi HS, Ren X, et al. Proinflammatory cytokines in the prefrontal cortex of teenage suicide victims. J Psychiatr Res. 2012;46:57–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2011.08.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Calandra T, Roger T. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor: a regulator of innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3:791–800. doi: 10.1038/nri1200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bloom BR, Bennett B. Mechanism of a reaction in vitro associated with delayed-type hypersensitivity. Science. 1966;153:80–82. doi: 10.1126/science.153.3731.80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.David JR. Delayed hypersensitivity in vitro: its mediation by cell-free substances formed by lymphoid cell-antigen interaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1966;56:72–77. doi: 10.1073/pnas.56.1.72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bernhagen J, Calandra T, Mitchell RA, et al. MIF is a pituitary-derived cytokine that potentiates lethal endotoxaemia. Nature. 1993;365:756–759. doi: 10.1038/365756a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Calandra T, Bernhagen J, Metz CN, et al. MIF as a glucocorticoid-induced modulator of cytokine production. Nature. 1995;377:68–71. doi: 10.1038/377068a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bacher M, Metz CN, Calandra T, et al. An essential regulatory role for macrophage migration inhibitory factor in T-cell activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:7849–7854. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.15.7849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Calandra T, Bernhagen J, Mitchell RA, Bucala R. Macrophage is an important and previously unrecognized source of macrophage-migration inhibitory factor. J Exp Med. 1994;179:1895–1902. doi: 10.1084/jem.179.6.1895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Flaster H, Bernhagen J, Calandra T, Bucala R. The macrophage migration inhibitory factor-glucocorticoid dyad: regulation of inflammation and immunity. Mol Endocrinol. 2007;21:1267–1280. doi: 10.1210/me.2007-0065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kleemann R, Hausser A, Geiger G, et al. Intracellular action of the cytokine MIF to modulate AP-1 activity and the cell cycle through Jab1. Nature. 2000;408:211–216. doi: 10.1038/35041591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bacher M, Meinhardt A, Lan HY, et al. MIF expression in the rat brain: implications for neuronal function. Mol Med. 1998;4:217–230. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Conboy L, Varea E, Castro JE, et al. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor is critically involved in basal and fluoxetine-stimulated adult hippocampal cell proliferation and in anxiety, depression, and memory-related behaviors. Mol Psychiatry. 2011;16:533–547. doi: 10.1038/mp.2010.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bloom J, Al-Abed Y. MIF: mood improving/inhibiting factor? J Neuroinflammation. 2014;11:11. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-11-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Christian LM, Franco A, Iams JD, Sheridan J, Glaser R. Depressive symptoms predict exaggerated inflammatory responses to an in vivo immune challenge among pregnant women. Brain Behav Immun. 2010;24:49–53. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2009.05.055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Musil R, Schwarz MJ, Riedel M, et al. Elevated macrophage migration inhibitory factor and decreased transforming growth factor-beta levels in major depression – no influence of celecoxib treatment. J Affect Disord. 2011;134:217–225. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.05.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zunszain PA, Hepgul N, Pariante CM. Inflammation and depression. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2013;14:135–151. doi: 10.1007/7854_2012_211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bot M, Chan MK, Jansen R, et al. Serum proteomic profiling of major depressive disorder. Transl Psychiatry. 2015;5:e599. doi: 10.1038/tp.2015.88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Stelzhammer V, Haenisch F, Chan MK, et al. Proteomic changes in serum of first onset, antidepressant drug-naive major depression patients. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014;17:1599–1608. doi: 10.1017/S1461145714000819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Edwards KM, Bosch JA, Engeland CG, Cacioppo JT, Marucha PT. Elevated macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) is associated with depressive symptoms, blunted cortisol reactivity to acute stress, and lowered morning cortisol. Brain Behav Immun. 2010;24:1202–1208. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2010.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Coryell W, Schlesser M. The dexamethasone suppression test and suicide prediction. Am J Psychiatry. 2001;158:748–753. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.5.748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Baugh JA, Chitnis S, Donnelly SC, et al. A functional promoter polymorphism in the macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) gene associated with disease severity in rheumatoid arthritis. Genes Immun. 2002;3:170–176. doi: 10.1038/sj.gene.6363867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.De Benedetti F, Meazza C, Vivarelli M, et al. Functional and prognostic relevance of the -173 polymorphism of the macrophage migration inhibitory factor gene in systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48:1398–1407. doi: 10.1002/art.10882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Donn RP, Shelley E, Ollier WE, Thomson W, British Paediatric Rheumatology Study Group A novel 5′-flanking region polymorphism of macrophage migration inhibitory factor is associated with systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44:1782–1785. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200108)44:8<1782::AID-ART314>3.0.CO;2-#. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lehmann LE, Book M, Hartmann W, et al. MIF haplotype is associated with the outcome of patients with severe sepsis: a case control study. J Transl Med. 2009;7:100. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-7-100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wu J, Fu S, Ren X, et al. Association of MIF promoter polymorphisms with childhood asthma in a northeastern Chinese population. Tissue Antigens. 2009;73:302–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0039.2008.01206.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wang FF, Huang XF, Shen N, et al. A genetic role for macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) in adult-onset Still’s disease. Arthritis Res Ther. 2013;15:R65. doi: 10.1186/ar4239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kuai SG, Ou QF, You DH, et al. Functional polymorphisms in the gene encoding macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) are associated with active pulmonary tuberculosis. Infect Dis (Lond) 2016;48:222–228. doi: 10.3109/23744235.2015.1107188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Savva A, Brouwer MC, Roger T, et al. Functional polymorphisms of macrophage migration inhibitory factor as predictors of morbidity and mortality of pneumococcal meningitis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:3597–3602. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1520727113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Dumais A, Lesage AD, Lalovic A, et al. Is violent method of suicide a behavioral marker of lifetime aggression? Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162:1375–1378. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.7.1375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Okazaki S, Watanabe Y, Hishimoto A, et al. Association analysis of putative cis-acting polymorphisms of interleukin-19 gene with schizophrenia. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2014;50:151–156. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2013.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Otsuka I, Watanabe Y, Hishimoto A, et al. Association analysis of the Cadherin13 gene with schizophrenia in the Japanese population. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015;11:1381–1393. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S84736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ. Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:263–265. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Dupont WD, Plummer WD. Power and sample size calculations for studies involving linear regression. Control Clin Trials. 1998;19:589–601. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(98)00037-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Canetto SS, Cleary A. Men, masculinities and suicidal behaviour. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74:461–465. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Shenassa ED, Catlin SN, Buka SL. Lethality of firearms relative to other suicide methods: a population based study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;57:120–124. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.2.120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Pivac N, Pregelj P, Nikolac M, et al. The association between catechol-O-methyl-transferase Val108/158Met polymorphism and suicide. Genes Brain Behav. 2011;10:565–569. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2011.00695.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Pregelj P, Nedic G, Paska AV, et al. The association between brain-derived neurotrophic factor polymorphism (BDNF Val66Met) and suicide. J Affect Disord. 2011;128:287–290. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Major Depressive Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Gwas Consortium. Ripke S, Wray NR, Lewis CM, et al. A mega-analysis of genome-wide association studies for major depressive disorder. Mol Psychiatry. 2013;18:497–511. doi: 10.1038/mp.2012.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hyde CL, Nagle MW, Tian C, et al. Identification of 15 genetic loci associated with risk of major depression in individuals of European descent. Nat Genet. 2016;48:1031–1036. doi: 10.1038/ng.3623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Galfalvy H, Haghighi F, Hodgkinson C, et al. A genome-wide association study of suicidal behavior. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2015;168:557–563. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Llamas-Covarrubias MA, Valle Y, Bucala R, et al. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF): genetic evidence for participation in early onset and early stage rheumatoid arthritis. Cytokine. 2013;61:759–765. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2012.12.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Swanberg M, McGuigan F, Ivaska KK, et al. Polymorphisms in the macrophage migration inhibitory factor gene and bone loss in postmenopausal women. Bone. 2010;47:424–429. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2010.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bucala R. MIF, MIF alleles, and prospects for therapeutic intervention in autoimmunity. J Clin Immunol. 2013;33(Suppl 1):S72–S78. doi: 10.1007/s10875-012-9781-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1.

Association of MIF promoter polymorphisms with suicide completers and controls for males

Polymorphism Male suicide
(n=408)
Male control
(n=340)
P-valuea Global P-valueb OR (95% CI) Power
N Frequency N Frequency
MIF-794CATT5–8
Genotype
 55 56 0.137 49 0.144 0.788 0.584 0.945 (0.625–1.429) 0.059
 56 159 0.390 119 0.350 0.263 1.186 (0.880–1.599) 0.193
 57 53 0.130 44 0.129 0.984 1.004 (0.654–1.542) 0.050
 66 77 0.189 77 0.226 0.204 0.795 (0.557–1.133) 0.256
 67 53 0.130 38 0.112 0.450 1.187 (0.761–1.850) 0.108
 77 10 0.025 13 0.038 0.279 0.632 (0.274–1.460) 0.194
Allele
 CATT5 324 0.397 261 0.384 0.601 0.875 1.057 (0.858–1.303) 0.080
 CATT6 366 0.449 311 0.457 0.733 0.965 (0.787–1.184) 0.061
 CATT7 126 0.154 108 0.159 0.815 0.967 (0.731–1.280) 0.058
MIF-173G/C
Genotype
 GG 252 0.618 218 0.641 0.507 0.753 0.904 (0.671–1.218) 0.100
 GC 136 0.333 102 0.300 0.330 1.167 (0.856–1.591) 0.154
 CC 20 0.049 20 0.059 0.553 0.825 (0.436–1.560) 0.097
Allele
 G 640 0.784 538 0.791 0.747 0.960 (0.748–1.231) 0.062
 C 176 0.216 142 0.209
Haplotype
 MIFCATT5-173G 283 0.347 234.1 0.344 0.920 0.769 1.011 (0.816–1.253) 0.052
 MIFCATT6-173G 357.4 0.438 300.6 0.442 0.875 0.984 (0.801–1.207) 0.053
 MIFCATT7-173G 2.1 0.003 0.1 0.000 0.208 17.54 (0.031–9.989) 0.000
 MIFCATT5-173C 41 0.050 26.9 0.040 0.320 1.284 (0.781–2.112) 0.132
 MIFCATT6-173C 8.6 0.011 10.4 0.015 0.413 0.686 (0.276–1.702) 0.111
 MIFCATT7-173C 123.9 0.152 107.9 0.159 0.715 0.949 (0.717–1.257) 0.067

Notes:

a

P-values were tested with the χ2 test.

b

Global P-value was calculated by Fisher’s exact test or Cochran–Armitage test for trend, as appropriate.

Abbreviations: MIF, macrophage migration inhibitory factor; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Table S2.

Association of MIF promoter polymorphisms with suicide completers and controls for females

Polymorphism Female suicide
(n=194)
Female control
(n=388)
P-valuea Global P-valueb OR (95% CI) Power
N Frequency N Frequency
MIF-794CATT5–8
Genotype
 55 30 0.155 56 0.144 0.741 0.850 1.084 (0.670–1.755) 0.066
 56 72 0.371 132 0.340 0.461 1.145 (0.799–1.639) 0.114
 57 24 0.124 51 0.131 0.793 0.933 (0.555–1.568) 0.055
 66 34 0.175 81 0.209 0.339 0.805 (0.517–1.255) 0.162
 67 30 0.155 55 0.142 0.678 1.108 (0.684–1.794) 0.072
 77 4 0.021 13 0.034 0.384 0.607 (0.195–1.888) 0.119
Allele
 CATT5 156 0.402 295 0.380 0.470 0.762 1.096 (0.854–1.407) 0.112
 CATT6 170 0.438 349 0.450 0.708 0.954 (0.746–1.219) 0.067
 CATT7 62 0.160 132 0.170 0.656 0.928 (0.667–1.290) 0.070
MIF-173G/C
Genotype
 GG 121 0.624 233 0.601 0.589 0.390 1.103 (0.774–1.572) 0.082
 GC 67 0.345 135 0.348 0.951 0.989 (0.688–1.420) 0.050
 CC 6 0.031 20 0.052 0.256 0.587 (0.232–1.487) 0.196
Allele
 G 309 0.796 601 0.774 0.394 1.139 (0.845–1.536) 0.089
 C 79 0.204 175 0.226
Haplotype
 MIFCATT5-173G 143.7 0.370 262.6 0.338 0.280 0.519 1.150 (0.892–1.483) 0.187
 MIFCATT6-173G 164.3 0.423 340.6 0.439 0.615 0.939 (0.734–1.201) 0.081
 MIFCATT7-173G 2.1 0.005 1.1 0.001 0.233 3.834 (0.380–38.62) 0.071
 MIFCATT5-173C 12.3 0.032 32.4 0.042 0.398 0.751 (0.385–1.465) 0.124
 MIFCATT6-173C 5.7 0.015 8.4 0.011 0.564 1.362 (0.467–3.975) 0.092
 MIFCATT7-173C 59.9 0.154 130.9 0.169 0.538 0.900 (0.645–1.256) 0.098

Notes:

a

P-values were tested with the χ2 test.

b

Global P-value was calculated by Fisher’s exact test or Cochran–Armitage test for trend, as appropriate.

Abbreviations: MIF, macrophage migration inhibitory factor; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Table S3.

Association of MIF promoter polymorphisms with violent suicide completers and controls

Polymorphism Violent suicide
(n=568)
Control
(n=728)
P-valuea Global P-valueb OR (95% CI) Power
N Frequency N Frequency
MIF-794CATT5–8
Genotype
 55 82 0.144 105 0.144 0.995 0.313 1.001 (0.733–1.368) 0.050
 56 220 0.387 251 0.345 0.114 1.201 (0.957–1.509) 0.329
 57 70 0.123 95 0.130 0.697 0.937 (0.673–1.303) 0.066
 66 105 0.185 158 0.217 0.153 0.818 (0.621–1.078) 0.309
 67 79 0.139 93 0.128 0.551 1.103 (0.799–1.522) 0.088
 77 12 0.021 26 0.036 0.122 0.583 (0.291–1.165) 0.387
Allele
 CATT5 454 0.400 556 0.382 0.357 0.554 1.078 (0.919–1.263) 0.152
 CATT6 509 0.448 660 0.453 0.791 0.979 (0.838–1.144) 0.057
 CATT7 173 0.152 240 0.165 0.387 0.910 (0.736–1.126) 0.148
MIF-173G/C
Genotype
 GG 355 0.625 451 0.620 0.840 0.542 1.024 (0.816–1.284) 0.054
 GC 190 0.335 237 0.326 0.734 1.041 (0.825–1.315) 0.063
 CC 23 0.040 40 0.055 0.230 0.726 (0.429–1.227) 0.250
Allele
 G 900 0.792 1,139 0.782 0.539 1.061 (0.878–1.283) 0.094
 C 236 0.208 317 0.218
Haplotype
 MIFCATT5-173G 406.8 0.358 496.7 0.341 0.369 0.547 1.077 (0.916–1.268) 0.145
 MIFCATT6-173G 494.8 0.436 640.9 0.440 0.812 0.981 (0.839–1.148) 0.055
 MIFCATT7-173G 4.1 0.004 1.2 0.001 0.113 4.391 (0.573–33.63) 0.057
 MIFCATT5-173C 47.2 0.042 59.3 0.041 0.915 1.021 (0.691–1.509) 0.052
 MIFCATT6-173C 14.2 0.013 19.1 0.013 0.900 0.952 (0.477–1.901) 0.050
 MIFCATT7-173C 168.9 0.149 238.8 0.164 0.286 0.890 (0.718–1.103) 0.184

Notes:

a

P-values were tested with the χ2 test.

b

Global P-value was calculated by Fisher’s exact test or Cochran–Armitage test for trend, as appropriate.

Abbreviations: MIF, macrophage migration inhibitory factor; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Table S4.

Association of MIF promoter polymorphisms with nonviolent suicide completers and controls

Polymorphism Nonviolent suicide
(n=10)
Control
(n=728)
P-valuea Global P-valueb OR (95% CI) Power
N Frequency N Frequency
MIF-794CATT5–8
Genotype
 55 1 0.100 105 0.144 0.692 0.890 0.659 (0.083–5.258) 0.037
 56 5 0.500 251 0.345 0.306 1.900 (0.545–6.626) 0.187
 57 1 0.100 95 0.130 0.776 0.740 (0.093–5.910) 0.036
 66 1 0.100 158 0.217 0.371 0.401 (0.050–3.188) 0.073
 67 2 0.200 93 0.128 0.498 1.707 (0.357–8.161) 0.152
 77 0 0.000 26 0.036 0.543
Allele
 CATT5 8 0.400 556 0.382 0.868 1.000 1.079 (0.438–2.656) 0.055
 CATT6 9 0.450 660 0.453 0.977 0.987 (0.406–2.396) 0.050
 CATT7 3 0.150 240 0.165 0.859 0.894 (0.260–3.075) 0.045
MIF-173G/C
Genotype
 GG 6 0.600 451 0.620 0.840 0.852 0.921 (0.258–3.294) 0.054
 GC 4 0.400 237 0.326 0.874 1.381 (0.386–4.941) 0.089
 CC 0 0.000 40 0.055 0.953
Allele
 G 16 0.800 1,139 0.782 0.935 1.113 (0.370–3.353) 0.047
 C 4 0.200 317 0.218
Haplotype
 MIFCATT5-173G 6.8 0.340 496.6 0.341 0.980 0.971 0.995 (0.392–2.526) 0.050
 MIFCATT6-173G 8.9 0.445 641.2 0.440 0.965 1.019 (0.419–2.476) 0.050
 MIFCATT7-173G 0.0 0.000 1.0 0.001 0.907
 MIFCATT5-173C 1.2 0.060 59.4 0.041 0.642 1.501 (0.233–9.675) 0.120
 MIFCATT6-173C 0.1 0.005 18.8 0.013 0.744 0.384 (0.001–195.1) 0.004
 MIFCATT7-173C 3.0 0.150 239.0 0.164 0.863 0.899 (0.261–3.090) 0.045

Notes:

a

P-values were tested with the χ2 test.

b

Global P-value was calculated by Fisher’s exact test or Cochran–Armitage test for trend, as appropriate.

Abbreviations: MIF, macrophage migration inhibitory factor; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Table S5.

Association of MIF promoter polymorphisms with violent and nonviolent suicide completers

Polymorphism Violent suicide
(n=568)
Nonviolent suicide
(n=10)
P-valuea Global P-valueb OR (95% CI) Power
N Frequency N Frequency
MIF-794CATT5–8
Genotype
 55 82 0.144 1 0.100 0.692 0.940 1.519 (0.190–12.15) 0.032
 56 220 0.387 5 0.500 0.469 0.632 (0.181–2.209) 0.134
 57 70 0.123 1 0.100 0.824 1.265 (0.158–10.13) 0.036
 66 105 0.185 1 0.100 0.492 2.041 (0.256–16.29) 0.031
 67 79 0.139 2 0.200 0.582 0.646 (0.135–3.099) 0.139
 77 12 0.021 0 0.000 0.642
Allele
 CATT5 454 0.400 8 0.400 0.998 1.000 0.999 (0.405–2.462) 0.050
 CATT6 509 0.448 9 0.450 0.986 0.992 (0.408–2.413) 0.050
 CATT7 173 0.152 3 0.150 0.978 1.018 (0.295–3.511) 0.049
MIF-173G/C
Genotype
 GG 355 0.625 6 0.600 0.871 0.932 1.111 (0.310–3.982) 0.056
 GC 190 0.335 4 0.400 0.664 0.754 (0.210–2.704) 0.085
 CC 23 0.040 0 0.000 0.516
Allele
 G 900 0.792 16 0.800 0.933 0.953 (0.316–2.878) 0.048
 C 236 0.208 4 0.200
Haplotype
 MIFCATT5-173G 406.0 0.357 6.8 0.340 0.858 0.973 1.080 (0.425–2.745) 0.050
 MIFCATT6-173G 494.6 0.435 8.9 0.445 0.932 0.962 (0.395–2.341) 0.051
 MIFCATT7-173G 4.3 0.004 0.0 0.000 0.800
 MIFCATT5-173C 48.0 0.042 1.2 0.060 0.666 0.691 (0.107–4.475) 0.121
 MIFCATT6-173C 14.4 0.013 0.1 0.005 0.760 2.555 (0.005–1.304) 0.003
 MIFCATT7-173C 168.7 0.149 3.0 0.150 0.988 0.988 (0.287–3.409) 0.051

Notes:

a

P-values were tested with the χ2 test.

b

Global P-value was calculated by Fisher’s exact test or Cochran–Armitage test for trend, as appropriate.

Abbreviations: MIF, macrophage migration inhibitory factor; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.


Articles from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment are provided here courtesy of Dove Press

RESOURCES