Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2017 Mar 30;7:45407. doi: 10.1038/srep45407

Phosphatidylinositol (4,5)-bisphosphate dynamically regulates the K2P background K+ channel TASK-2

María Isabel Niemeyer 1,a, L Pablo Cid 1, Marc Paulais 2, Jacques Teulon 2, Francisco V Sepúlveda 1,b
PMCID: PMC5371824  PMID: 28358046

Abstract

Two-pore domain K2P K+ channels responsible for the background K+ conductance and the resting membrane potential, are also finely regulated by a variety of chemical, physical and physiological stimuli. Hormones and transmitters acting through Gq protein-coupled receptors (GqPCRs) modulate the activity of various K2P channels but the signalling involved has remained elusive, in particular whether dynamic regulation by membrane PI(4,5)P2, common among other classes of K+ channels, affects K2P channels is controversial. Here we show that K2P K+ channel TASK-2 requires PI(4,5)P2 for activity, a dependence that accounts for its run down in the absence of intracellular ATP and its full recovery by addition of exogenous PI(4,5)P2, its inhibition by low concentrations of polycation PI scavengers, and inhibition by PI(4,5)P2 depletion from the membrane. Comprehensive mutagenesis suggests that PI(4,5)P2 interaction with TASK-2 takes place at C-terminus where three basic aminoacids are identified as being part of a putative binding site.

The phosphoinositide phospholipids (PIPs) are made of a water-soluble inositol head group and a phosphoglycerol moiety linking it to two fatty acid chains. PI(4,5)P2 phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate is a minor component (<1%) of the inner leaflet of eukaryotic cell plasma membranes and yet is the most abundant of the PIPs populating it. Other PIPs, of which important ones are PI(3,4)P2 and PI(3,4,5)P3, are almost quantitatively negligible by comparison with PI(4,5)P2. Specific kinases and phosphatases regulate the phosphorylation state at various positions at the inositol ring and the level of PIPs in the membrane is maintained in a dynamic equilibrium. Negatively charged PIPs play prominent roles in the regulation of transmembrane protein function in eukaryotic cells, be it as purveyors of secondary signalling molecules generated through the action of receptor-activated enzymes, or through direct interactions with their target proteins. Rather prominent in the menu of membrane proteins directly controlled by PIPs are ion channels and transporters with which these phospholipids have convincingly been shown to interact physically, justifying the dubbing of this field in a recent review as “A frontier led by studies in ion channels”1.

PI(4,5)P2 is attacked by the enzyme phospholipase C (PLC) in response to activation of G-protein coupled receptors that signal through Gq/11 Gα proteins. This produces soluble inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) and membrane-dwelling diacylglycerol (DAG), which respectively elicit a Ca2+ signal by release from intracellular stores and activation of protein kinase C (PKC). PI(4,5)P2, however, is a signalling molecule in its own right and its presence in the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane, initially recognised as essential for the activity of the Na+-Ca2+ exchanger and KATP channels2, is now known to be needed as a co-factor for many ion channels and transporters3,4. Virtually all K+ channels of the inwardly rectifying Kir family and several voltage-gated KV, and Ca2+-activated KCa channels require PIPs, generally PI(4,5)P2, for their activity1,4,5. Activation of Gq/11 G-protein coupled receptors (GqPCRs) therefore generally lead to an inhibition of the channels associated to the concomitant decrease in membrane PI(4,5)P2. Whether the same occurs with K+ channels belonging to the two-P domain in tandem K2P clade, has been controversial.

K2P K+ channels are expressed widely and provide a leak pathway present in virtually all eukaryotic cells. K2P channels are subjected to fine tuning by a variety of stimuli, including changes in membrane tension, voltage, temperature, extra- and intracellular pH, and G-protein coupled receptor activation, and play roles in a many important physiological processes6,7,8,9. The K2P channel family has 15 mammalian members that fall into six groups: TWIK (weak inward rectifiers), TREK (lipid and mechanosensitive channels), TASK (acidification-inhibited), TALK (alkalinisation-activated), THIK (inhibited by halothane), and TRESK (spinal cord channels). Channels belonging to the TASK, TREK and TRESK subfamilies have been shown to be modulated by GqPCRs10. TASK channels TASK-1 and TASK-311,12,13 and TREK-1 and TREK-211,14,15,16 are inhibited by various hormones and transmitters signalling through GqPCRs. Exceptionally, TRESK channels are activated by GqPCR stimulation, a response mediated by increased intracellular Ca2+ that triggers a mechanism involving calcineurin17,18. TASK-1, TASK-3 and TREK-1 channels had been reported to be activated by PI(4,5)P2 and it was proposed that its hydrolysis underlies the inhibition by GqPCR agonists19. Other studies, however, have shown TASK and TREK channels to be insensitive to decreases in membrane PI(4,5)P220,21,22. This suggests that although inhibited by GqPCR activation-elicited conversion of PI(4,5)P2 into DAG and IP3, the decrease in PI(4,5)P2 per se does not inhibit these K2P channels. Instead it appears that DAG might play a central role in linking receptor activation and TASK and TREK channel modulation11,23.

The K2P K+ channel known as TASK-2 (also K2P5.1)24,25 is involved in bicarbonate reabsorption in the proximal tubules of the kidney26, the central detection of CO2 and O2 by chemo-sensitive neurons implicated in breathing control27,28,29, and in the hearing function through an essential role in outer sulcus cells possibly in K+ recycling30. From a pathophysiological point of view, TASK-2 has been implicated in a predisposition to Balkan endemic nephropathy31 through a dominant negative missense mutation supressing function32,33, in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis in humans34, and in murine inflammatory bowel disease35. TASK-2 is gated by extra- and intracellular pH, changes in cell volume and by Gβγ subunits of G proteins36,37,38,39. We have now explored the dependence on membrane phosphoinositides of the activity of TASK-2. Our results show that TASK-2 is strongly phosphoinositide-dependent and that this dependence probably involves an interaction of C-terminal positively charged residues with PI(4,5)P2. TASK-2 is a major player in a variety of physiological processes24,25 in which the phosphoinositide-dependence we have now uncovered might play a role. Our finding also points to the idea that K2P channels, though departing in structure and regulation from other members of the K+ channel superfamily, do nevertheless share some of their regulatory characteristics.

Results

The activity of TASK-2 K+ channels is dependent on intracellular ATP and is decreased by positively charged polyvalent compounds

Certain classes of ion channel require the presence of intracellular ATP and deactivate when the intracellular aspect of isolated membranes where they reside is exposed to solutions lacking ATP, a phenomenon known as “run-down”. ATP is required for continued activity of TASK-2 that otherwise declines markedly in its absence or upon replacement by a non-hydrolysable analogue (Fig. 1). Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings of HEK-293 cells expressing TASK-2 yield typical K+ currents that persist in the presence of intracellular ATP (Fig. 1A and C) but markedly decline in its absence (Fig. 1B and D). The time course of current decrease shown in Fig. 1E has a half time of around 3 min and requires a hydrolysable nucleotide, as the non-hydrolysable analogue adenosine-5′-(γ-thio)-triphosphate (ATP-γ-S) was unable to support the TASK-2-mediated current. A similar result was obtained for TASK-2 channels in excised inside-out patches of membrane (Fig. 1F and G) that run-down reversibly upon removal of ATP from the solution bathing the intracellular aspect of the membrane. These patches, excised from cells overexpressing TASK-2 and recorded with low resistance pipettes, yielded robust inward K+ currents that were absent from untransfected cells and which obeyed to changes in intracellular pH exactly as expected from the typical TASK-2 behaviour (see Supplemental Fig. S1).

Figure 1. Effect of ATP removal on TASK-2-mediated currents.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

K+ currents recorded at 0 mV in HEK-293 cells expressing TASK-2 immediately after breaking into whole-cell recording (0 min) or after 20 min in cells dialysed with 1 mM ATP (A) or with the nucleotide omitted from the intracellular solution (B). The holding potential was −70 mV and the pulse was to 0 mV. (C and D) Corresponding current-voltage relations obtained from voltage ramps. (E) Time course of the K+ currents (means ± SEM) recorded at 0 mV in HEK-293 cells expressing TASK-2 after gaining access into the cells with pipette solutions containing 1 mM ATP (n = 10), no ATP (n = 9) or ATP-γ-S (n = 4). (F) Recording from an excised inside-out patch of membrane taken from a HEK-293 cell over-expressing TASK-2. The patch was held at −60 mV and at the indicated times intracellular 1 mM ATP was removed from the intracellular solution. During the time indicated by the black bar intracellular pH was decreased from 7.4 to 5.5. (G) Average currents measured before and after ATP removal (means ± SEM, n = 21). The observed decrease in current was statistically significant when measurements were compared with a paired test (**P < 0.001).

Run-down of ion channel activity in the absence of ATP is often an indicator of channel-dependence on membrane PIPs, most commonly PI(4,5)P2. PI(4,5)P2 is continuously hydrolysed and simultaneously replenished by enzymes that require ATP (and Mg2+)1,2. An important part of the ion channel-PIP interaction is electrostatic, involving the negatively charged PIP head and positive charges in the channel protein. Inhibition of channel activity by polyvalent cations is taken as evidence of masking PI(4,5)P2 negative charges, therefore disabling the interaction40. The polycationic antibiotic neomycin applied intracellularly inhibits TASK-2 activity (Fig. 2A) with a near maximum effect already at 200 μM with 100 μM yielding an intermediate effect. Neomycin also strongly inhibited TASK-2 activity in excised inside-out patches (Fig. 2B). The effect of neomycin at 300 μM was only slightly less marked than that seen during channel closure by acidification38 or by 50 μM of the intracellular pore blocker tetrapentyl ammonium (TPeA)41, which inhibits TASK-2 with an IC50 of ~2 μM (not shown). Figure 2C shows the effect of graded addition of neomycin applied intracellularly to an inside-out patch of membrane on TASK-2 current. The inhibitory effect was dose-dependent with an IC50 of 23.4 ± 2.7 (mean ± SEM) in four separate experiments.

Figure 2. Effect of PI(4,5)P2 scavengers on TASK-2-mediated currents.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(A) Time course of K+ currents (means ± SEM) recorded at 0 mV in HEK-293 cells expressing TASK-2 after gaining access into the cells with pipette solutions containing 100 (n = 3), 200 (n = 4) or 300 (n = 9) μM Neomycin. The recordings were made in the presence of 1 mM intracellular ATP. The control curve shown as a dashed line is from Fig. 1E. (B) Recording from an excised inside-out patch of membrane taken from a HEK-293 cell over-expressing TASK-2. The patch was held at −60 mV in the presence of 1 mM intracellular ATP. During the times indicated by the bars intracellular pH was decreased from 7.4 to 5.5, or 300 μM Neomycin or 100 μM TPeA were added. (C) Recording from an excised inside-out patch obtained under the same conditions as in (B), except that the concentration of neomycin in the solution bathing the intracellular aspect of the membrane was increased stepwise from 5 to 500 μM as shown. The graph shows the means of four experiments that gave an average IC50 for neomycin of 23.4 ± 2.7 μM (mean ± SEM, n = 4).

TASK-2 inhibition by activation of a Gq-coupled receptor

It is well established that activation of GqPCRs is accompanied by PI(4,5)P2 metabolism leading to depletion in the membrane. This can cause inactivation of ion transporters or channels such as the M-type KV7.2/7.3 K+ channels that control the firing of neurones responsible for catecholamine secretion42,43,44,45. Consistent with a possible sensitivity to PI(4,5)P2, TASK-2 channels expressed with angiotensin II AT1 receptors are markedly inhibited by stimulation with angiotensin II (Fig. 3A). TASK-2 is inhibited by Gβγ subunits of G proteins and this effect is crucially dependent upon C-terminus lysine residues 257 and 25839. The angiotensin II effect was not significantly different in the Gβγ-insensitive TASK-2-K257A-K258A mutant (Fig. 3A).

Figure 3. Gq protein coupled receptor inhibition of TASK-2 and minor effect of diacylglycerol.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(A) Effect of activation of the angiotensin II receptor AT1 on TASK-2-mediated currents. HEK-293 cells were co-transfected with AT1 and TASK-2, or the TASK-2-K257A-K258A mutant. Current was monitored by brief pulses to 0 mV from a holding potential of −75 mV. Angiotensin II at a concentration of 1 μM was added during the indicated time. Results are means ± SEM of 6 experiments for TASK-2 and 4 experiments for TASK-2-K257A-K258A. (B) Effect of a diacylglycerol analogue assayed on TASK-2- and TASK-3-expressing cells. Current was monitored by brief pulses to 0 mV from a holding potential of −75 mV. The box labelled DAG indicates the addition of diacylglycerol short-chain analogue 1,2-dioctanoyl-sn-glycerol at 100 nM. Results are means ± SEM of 5 experiments for TASK-2 and 8 experiments for TASK-3.

The regulation of TASK-1 and -3 K2P channels by GqPCRs was originally ascribed to a direct dependence on PI(4,5)P219 but this view has now been challenged20,21. The most recently published evidence supports a hypothesis according to which GqPCR inhibition of TASK-1 and TASK-3 is exclusively due to released diacylglycerol (DAG) directly acting on the channel protein, without any role for the concomitant reduction in PI(4,5)P223. An inhibitory effect of DAG has also been shown for TREK-1 and found important in its regulation by GqPCRs11. DAG, however, only caused a minor effect on TASK-2, in contrast with the strong inhibition it produces on TASK-3 (see Fig. 3B), suggesting that it is not the main drive behind AT1-dependent inhibition of TASK-2.

Plasma membrane PI(4,5)P2 depletion by a voltage-sensitive phosphatase inhibits TASK-2 activity

For a more direct test of the hypothesis that TASK-2 is PI(4,5)P2-sensitive we have used DrVSP, a voltage sensitive phosphatase from Danio rerio, that removes 5-phosphate groups from PI(4,5)P2 thereby depleting the membrane of this PIP rapidly and efficiently46. When TASK-2 is expressed together with DrVSP in HEK-293, strong depolarisation leads to a marked inhibition of the current that is not present in cells transfected with TASK-2 alone (see Supplementary Fig. S2). The decline in channel activity elicited by DrVSP activation by depolarisation is reversible upon return to a negative potential (Fig. 4A), but only in the presence of Mg2+ (Fig. 4B and C). This is to be expected if endogenous, Mg2+-dependent PI-5-kinase were resynthesising PI(4,5)P2 from PI(4)P once the activity of DrVSP is discontinued.

Figure 4. Sensitivity of TASK-2 to co-expressed DrVSP activation.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(A) Representative trace of a current recording from a HEK-293 cell co-expressing TASK-2 and DrVSP. The potential was held at −75 mV and 300 ms pulses to 0 mV were delivered at 5 s intervals. DrVSP was activated with a 10 s depolarisation to 100 mV. The intracellular solution contained 1 mM ATP and 1 mM Mg2+. (B) As in (A), but with Mg2+ omitted from the intracellular solution. (C) Average currents for experiments as in A and B. Results are the means ± SEM of 7 (circles) and 6 (triangles) experiments. (D) Voltage-dependence of DrVSP activation on TASK-2-meadiated current. The results are means ± SEM of 7 experiments and the continuous line is a fit of a Boltzmann equation to the data.

The magnitude and speed of current inhibition by DrVSP activation are dependent on voltage (Fig. 4D). The degree of current inhibition rises with depolarisation with a V1/2 value of 20 ± 2.2 mV. This voltage-sensitivity has been shown to be the consequence of the phosphatase titrating PI(4,5)P2 in the plasma membrane as the PIP will decrease with increasing depolarisation44,47. On the basis of its voltage sensitivity in these DrVSP co-expression experiments, the apparent affinity of TASK-2 for PI(4,5)P2 should be close to that of Kv7.3 and Kir2.147.

Activation of TASK-2 channels by intracellular application of phosphoinositides

If the rundown of TASK-2 in excised membrane patches in the absence of ATP is due to a decline in PI(4,5)P2, a recovery of the current would be expected to occur by addition of exogenous phosphoinositide. The experiments in Fig. 5A–D test the ability of PI(4,5)P2 and other phosphoinositides, all in their soluble DiC8 form, to stimulate TASK-2 after its activity has decreased in the absence of ATP. All phosphoinositides tested had some stimulating effect on TASK-2-mediated currents when added to inside-out excised patches, but they varied markedly in their potency. Largest effect was obtained with PI(3,4,5)P3 whilst the response to PI(4)P was quite small. Robust, but intermediate effects were exerted by PI(4,5)P2 and PI(3,4)P2. The effects are compared quantitatively in Fig. 5E where the EC50 values can be seen to rank in the order PI(3,4,5)P3 < PI(4,5)P2 < PI(3,4)P2 < PI(4)P (see Fig. 5E legend). Interestingly, the dose response curves for PI(3,4)P2 and PI(4)P were best fitted by Hill equations with nH of 2, whilst those for PI(3,4,5)P3 and PI(4,5)P2 were rectangular hyperbolae. The sensitivity of TASK-2 to the diC8 form of PI(4,5)P2 would indicate an apparent affinity similar to that of Kir2.348 or the heteromer formed by Kv7.2 and Kv7.349.

Figure 5. Concentration dependence of the effect of some phosphoinosides on TASK-2 activity.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

(A) Recording from an excised inside-out patch of membrane taken from a HEK-293 cell over-expressing TASK-2. The patch was held at −60 mV and was initially in absence of ATP for at least 5 min, a condition that inhibits the current. The effect of PI(4,5)P2 in its diC8 is shown. The PIP was added at increasing concentrations from 2.5 to 50 μM. ATP at 1 mM was then readmitted and the effects of 300 μM Neomycin and 100 μM TPeA tested. (B,C and D) Similar experiments but using diC8 PI(3,4,5)P3, PI(3,4)P2 and PI(4)P respectively. Other details as in (A). (E) Summary of the effects of the four PIPs tested. The effects are presented as the average current recorded at a given concentration of the PIP normalised to that in its absence, with all measurements taken in the absence of ATP. Lines are fitted rectangular hyperbolae for PI(3,4,5)P3 and PI(4,5)P2, and Hill equations with nH of 2 for PI(3,4)P2 and PI(4)P. Maximal fold effects from these fits were (means ± SEM) 11.6 ± 1.6, 3.7 ± 0.2, 4.3 ± 0.4 and 1.4 ± 0.4 respectively for PI(3,4,5)P3, PI(4,5)P2, PI(3,4)P2 and PI(4)P. The corresponding K0.5 values were 29.8 ± 10.2, 34.9 ± 3.3, 48.4 ± 4.6 and 50.6 ± 1.3 μM. Points in the graph are means ± SEM of 3–8 experiments.

Addition of ATP after treatment with PIPs appeared to elicit higher currents than those under maximal PIP stimulation. This impression is quantified in Supplementary Fig. S3. The effect of ATP readmitted to the intracellular aspect of inside-out patches was much larger (5.6-fold) than the maximal effect elicited by PI(4)P. The effect of ATP was also larger than the maximal activation with PI(3,4)P2 or PI(4,5)P2 but this only 1.4- and 1.7-fold respectively, whilst that of PI(3,4,5)P3 was similar to that elicited by ATP. Assuming that ATP restores normal levels of endogenous membrane PI(4,5)P2 and that this is the natural TASK-2 activator phosphoinositide, we speculate that PI(4)P with only one phosphate in its head group is not capable to emulate its efficacy. It is possible that the short-chain diC8 forms of PI(3,4)P2 or PI(4,5)P2 used here do not faithfully supplant the potency of the native, long-chain PI(4,5)P2. This might be compensated in the case of PI(3,4,5)P3 on a purely electrostatic basis. Other, unidentified ATP-dependent factors contributing to TASK-2 activity may also intervene to explain our results, but these, if present, will need further work to unravel.

Identifying TASK-2 residues responsible for interaction with membrane PI(4,5)P2

The interaction between PI(4,5)P2 and the proteins it regulates have been shown to be electrostatic in nature50, and naturally-occurring mutations affecting basic residues in Kir channels decrease their affinity for PI(4,5)P2 and lead to channelopathies51. If the same principle applied to TASK-2, replacement of positively charged residues facing intracellularly (identified in Fig. 6A) by the neutral cysteine residue should reduce its activity. The reactivity of cysteine affords the possibility of using charge, and activity restoration with positively-charged small methanethiosulfonate reagents to identify basic residues important for PI(4,5)P2 interaction.

Figure 6. Scanning of potential sites of interaction of TASK-2 with PI(4,5)P2 by cysteine mutagenesis of intracellular basic residues.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

(A) Schematic representation of TASK-2 topology showing the sequences of segments of the protein predicted to be intracellular or intracellular-facing. Basic residues are highlighted in red. (B) Recording from an excised inside-out patch of membrane taken from a HEK-293 cell over-expressing TASK-2. The patch was held at −60 mV in the presence of 1 mM ATP. At the intervals indicated by the boxes the intracellular aspect of the membrane was exposed to 300 μM Neomycin and then to 100 μM TPeA. At the end of the TPeA period the patch was additionally exposed to 1 mM MTSET as shown by the black box. (C and D) experiments as in (B), but with inside-out membrane patches obtained from cells expressing the mutants TASK-2-H327C and TASK-2-K297C respectively. In D the reducing agent DTT was also added at 2 mM. (E) Summary of experiments comparing the current before and after treatment with MTSET. The only mutants differing significantly from WT TASK-2 were TASK-2-K254 C and TASK-2-K297C (P < 0.001 by Bonferroni-corrected t-test).

A survey of the whole-cell currents associated to expression of the different mutants gave highly variable results (Fig. 7). Only three point mutants, TASK-2-R4C, -K254C and -K297C, showed significantly decreased currents with respect to WT TASK-2. Several mutants exhibited significant increases in current. Of interest are those present in the stretch between positions 259 and 263, belonging to a remarkable basic amino acid-rich region in the early portion of the C-terminus. These might be gain-of-function mutants, but their identification as such will have to await further studies particularly of their expression levels. As variability could in general be due to alterations in expression levels or other unknown effects rather than to alterations in the strength of a putative channel-PI(4,5)P2 interaction, all cysteine mutants were tested for increases in activity upon methanesulfonate reagent treatment. Figure 6B–D show examples of recordings from inside-out patches from cells expressing non-mutated TASK-2 or the H327C and K297C mutants. Neither WT nor H327C channel activity is affected by brief intracellular exposure to [2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl]methanethiosulfonate (MTSET, used in the presence of TPeA, see Supplementary material). The activity of TASK-2-K297C on the other hand is markedly enhanced by MTSET treatment and this effect was reversed, at least partially by addition of the reducing agent dithiothreitol (DTT). A summary of our systematic exploration of all intracellularly facing basic residues of TASK-2 is shown in Fig. 6E. The survey suggests that K297 is a determinant of the interaction of the channel with membrane PI(4,5)P2. A second residue that appears of importance is K254 as TASK-2-K254C mutant is also significantly activated by the MTSET treatment (Fig. 6E). TASK-2-R4C that like TASK-2-K297C appeared to show low activity, was not affected by MTSET treatment.

Figure 7. Effect of neutralising positively charged residues on the current mediated by TASK-2.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Results of assays by whole-cell patch-clamp recordings of TASK-2 channels carrying the indicated point mutations, and also some deletion mutants, are shown. Those yielding significantly smaller currents than the WT TASK-2 are identified in red. Mutants giving what appeared as significantly larger currents are identified by the empty columns. The P values quoted are for t-test comparisons giving a significant difference with WT TASK-2.

It would appear from the experiments just described that from the positively charged residues candidate in TASK-2 that are expected to face the intracellular milieu only two, C-terminus-located lysines would be responsible for an interaction with membrane PIPs. A limitation in the approach, however, is that there might be amino acids important in the interaction but that are not accessed by the MTSET reagent during the course of the experiment. Alternatively the charged residue might be necessary in a function unrelated to a phosphoinositide interaction. A further test of the hypothesis is to assess the ability of DrVSP to inhibit WT and mutant TASK-2 channels to detect possible changes in the affinity of TASK-2 for PI(4,5)P2. It is well known that differences in the kinetics of deactivation of K+ channels by VSPs reflect differences in the affinities of said channels for PI(4,5)P2. For example deactivation of Kir2.1-R228Q, a mutant channel with independently demonstrated weakened interaction with PI(4,5)P2 as compared with WT Kir2.1, occurs with a faster time course upon VSP activation than in the WT channels47. We first examined TASK-2 channels carrying deletions in their C-terminus eliminating different portions of the C-terminus: Δ316, Δ417 and Δ455. Results are shown in Fig. 8A and reveal that deactivation by DrVSP was markedly faster than for WT TASK-2 in truncated mutants Δ316 and Δ417, but not in Δ455. This might imply that the stretch of tail between residues 316 and 455 contains amino acids involved in the interaction, while those beyond 455 are not relevant. Unfortunately this excludes only residues K496 and R500, and does not discard those located upstream of residue 316. We undertook the examination of the single point mutants and Fig. 8B shows two mutants exhibiting slow time course of DrVSP inhibition, R260A and R264A, a kinetics that did not differ from that seen when using WT TASK-2. A much faster current inhibition by DrVSP activation, however, was seen on the currents mediated by the K297C and R438C mutants of TASK-2 (Fig. 8B) suggesting that the absence of these residues weakens a putative interaction of the channel with membrane PIP. A systematic test of the remaining candidate mutants revealed that, besides the aforementioned truncated mutants, only these two point mutants showed significantly faster rates of DrVSP-induced channel deactivation (identified by red bars in Fig. 8C).

Figure 8. Inhibition of various mutants of TASK-2 by co-expressed DrVSP activation.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

(A and B) Averages of current traces recorded from a HEK-293 cell co-expressing WT TASK-2 or various truncated or point mutated channels together with DrVSP. The potential was held at −75 mV and a pulse to 80 mV with a duration of 40 s was given to activate DrVSP. The graphs report averages with SEMs of 5–10 experiments. The intracellular solution contained 1 mM ATP and 1 mM Mg2+. (C) Summary of results of effects of DrVSP activation on currents mediated by WT or mutant TASK-2 channels. The columns report the time taken for currents to decrease by 50% (t0.5) after stepping the voltage from −75 mV to 80 mV. The results are means ± SEM of 3–10 experiments. In red mutants that gave t0.5 values significantly smaller than WT with P < 0.05. White columns identify mutants that appeared to be inhibited more slowly than WT TASK-2.

Finally, we attempted a comparison between the potency of inhibition by neomycin between mutants and the WT channel as a means to further test changes in the TASK-2-PI(4,5)P2 affinity. The currents expressed in isolated patches by TASK-2 mutants R254C and K297C were too small to yield reliable measurements of IC50 for neomycin inhibition. That mediated by TASK-2-R438C was sufficiently large, however, and an IC50 value of 8.9 ± 1.5 μM (see Supplementary Fig. S7) was obtained. This was significantly lower that measured using WT TASK-2 (23.4 ± 2.7 μM, see Fig. 2) as tested using t-test (P = 0.003).

Discussion

The present results demonstrate that background K2P K+ channel TASK-2 requires the presence of membrane phosphoinositides for activity and that this dependence probably involves interaction of C-terminal positively charged residues with PI(4,5)P2. Several observations that are normally taken as diagnostic of a role for PI(4,5)P2 as an important cofactor to channel function3,4 are fulfilled by the data presented here for TASK-2. These can be summarised as follows: (a) The activity of TASK-2 expressed heterologously rapidly runs down in the absence of intracellular ATP, or when this is replaced with a non-hydrolysable analogue, either in whole-cell recordings or in isolated membrane patches; (b) TASK-2 channels recover from this rundown by addition of exogenous PI(4,5)P2 in excised membrane patches; (c) Neomycin and poly-lysine, polycation PI scavengers, also inhibit TASK-2 activity in the presence of intracellular ATP; (d) TASK-2 channels are strongly inhibited by activation of coexpressed voltage-sensitive phosphatase DrVSP that removes 5-phosphate groups from PI(4,5)P2; (e) Recovery from DrVSP-catalysed PI(4,5)P2 hydrolysis is inhibited in the absence of Mg2+ suggesting that the levels of PI(4,5)P2 re maintained by a dynamic equilibrium of hydrolysis and resynthesis requiring Mg-ATP.

The requirement for PI(4,5)P2 of TASK-2 is of low selectivity as all phosphoinositides tested had some stimulating effect on TASK-2. The most potent effect was that of PI(3,4,5)P3 and the effect of PI(4)P was rather weak. Phosphoinositides in general are minor components of the phospholipid population of cells. For example PI(4)P and PI(4,5)P2 make only 0.2–1% of the total cellular phospholipids. Both PI(3,4,5)P3 and PI(4,5)P2 are found in the plasma membrane but the abundance of the first is only 2–5% of that of PI(4,5)P252 suggesting that even being more potent in activating TASK-2, its contribution to TASK-2 activity is only minor. PI(4)P is abundant in the Golgi complex while PI(3,4)P2 is found in the plasma membrane and the early endosome compartment53. The relatively weak effect of PI(4)P probably explains why DrVSP activity has a potent effect on TASK-2 even when considering that DrVSP action converts PI(4,5)P2 into PI(4)P. This contrasts with the lack of effect of the same phosphatase on TREK-122. This result, apparently surprising in view of the well characterised requirement of an interaction of a polybasic motif in its C terminus and the most abundant phosphoinositide in the plasma membrane, PI(4,5)P254,55, has been explained on the basis of a lack of phospholipid specificity in the effect on TREK-122. It is puzzling that PI(4,5)P2 apparent affinity of TASK-2 judged from the voltage-dependence of DrVSP effect47 would put this K2P channel in a high affinity category together with Kir2.151 and Kv7.349,56 (diC8 PI(4,5)P2 EC50 3–6 μM). Affinity for the long-chain PI(4,5)P2 that is dephosphorylated by DrVSP may, however, be different from that for shorter diC8 form.

Consistent with a main requirement for PI(4,5)P2 as a cofactor for TASK-2 activity is its inhibition by activation of coexpressed Gq-coupled angiotensin II AT1 receptors. K2P channels TASK1, TASK3, TREK1 and TREK2 are inhibited by agonists that activate Gq proteins both in native and recombinant systems11,12,57. Initially, it was hypothesised that inhibition was due to the PI(4,5)P2 decline due to activation of Gq-coupled receptors19, but this view was contradicted by further work20,21. Phospholipase Cβ activation leads to a decrease in membrane PI(4,5)P2 and concomitant DAG production, which has been proposed as the mediator of the receptor-dependent inhibition of TREK-1 and -211 and TASK-1 and -323 channels. Use of DAG here reveals only a minor effect on TASK-2 suggesting that it is not the main signalling molecule linking receptor activation of channel inhibition. As TASK-2 is Ca2+-independent we surmise that the receptor effect is due to a decrease in PI(4,5)P2. The inhibition of TASK-2 associated to GqPR activation has not been reported before and its physiological relevance remains to be explored.

What are the molecular determinants responsible for the interaction of TASK-2 with membrane PI(4,5)P2? With the hypothesis that the interaction between TASK-2 and PI(4,5)P2 is electrostatic and requires the presence of intracellularly-facing positively charged residues, we proceeded to a systematic cysteine mutagenesis to determine if any of these amino acids took part in the binding. We reasoned that neutralisation of a putative interacting residue should lead to a decrease in the current the channel mediates, followed by an increase in current upon charge restoration after reaction with the MTSET reagent. Furthermore an acceleration of the rate at which DrVSP is capable of inhibiting the remaining current ought to occur because of a weakened interaction between the channel and PI(4,5)P2. The information for residues identified by these criteria is summarised in Table 1. It is seen that only K297 fulfils all three criteria and on this basis it is proposed that this residue is essential for the TASK-2-PI(4,5)P2 interaction. K254C exhibits both low current and activation by MTSET, but puzzlingly TASK-2-K254C shows unaltered kinetics of inhibition by DrVSP. Finally, mutation R438C accelerates the inhibition of TASK-2 by DrVSP but it is not affected by MTSET, which might reveal an accessibility problem. This mutant, however, is inhibited by lower concentrations of neomycin than WT TASK-2, suggesting that it is a genuine participant in the channel-PI(4,5)P2 interaction. R4C, on the other hand, only exhibits a diminished current and this could be due to the mutation altering the expression level of the channel or an unrelated functional property. In summary we conclude that three residues, K254, K297 and R438 all participate in the TASK-2-PI(4,5)P2 interaction, with the strongest evidence for K297. Interestingly, K297, together with K257 and K258, had been identified previously as possibly implicated in the inhibition of TASK-2 by Gβγ subunits of heterotrimeric G-proteins, but K297 was shown not to be required for Gβγ binding that is mediated by the K257/258 site only39.

Table 1. Functional effect of cysteine mutations in certain TASK-2 positively-charged residues.

Mutation I at 80 mV MTSET effect VSP inhibition Neomycin inhibition
R4C ✓ — — undet
K254C ✓ ✓ — undet
K297C ✓ ✓ ✓ undet
R438C — — ✓ ✓
Open in a new tab

✓ under “I at 80 mV” indicates a significantly decreased whole cell-current with respect to WT TASK-2. ✓ under “MTSET effect” indicates a significant increase in current after treatment with the methanesulfonate reagent. ✓ under “VSP inhibition” reveals an accelerated inhibition of the mutant compared with the speed of inhibition of WT TASK-2 by activation of cotransfected DrVSP. ✓ under Neomycin inhibition indicates a significantly lower IC50 for inhibition by neomycin compared to control. — in all cases stands for no significant effect. Undet, undetermined.

The number of residues that appear involved in the PI(4,5)P2 sensitivity of TASK-2 contrasts with that found in channels such as Kir2.1 for which five arginines, four lysines and one histidine are important51. Recently discovered PI(4,5)P2 binding structures for Kir2.2 and Kir3.2 are made up of six positively charged amino acids that interact with the negatively charged head group of PI(4,5)P2 in each of four subunits of the tetramer58,59,60. These differences in interacting residues between TASK-2 and the Kir channels might produce marked differences in PI(4,5)P2 binding affinities. However, although we have an idea of the EC50 of the PI(4,5)P2 effect on TASK-2, we ignore the mechanism by which it affects gating and therefore we cannot infer an affinity. A better idea of the strength of the TASK-2-PI(4,5)P2 interaction can be gathered from the ability of neomycin, a PI(4,5)P2-screening compound, to inhibit the channel. Neomycin inhibits TASK-2 with an IC50 of around 20 μM, putting TASK-2 in a group with Kir4.1/Kir5.1 that has a neomycin IC50 of 110 μM61 and therefore classifiable as of low PI(4,5)P2 affinity in a Kir context62. Based on the EC50 for activation by diC8 PIP(4,5)P2, TASK-2 “affinity” would be intermediate and similar to that of the Kv7.2/Kv7.3 complex49. However, judged by the V0.5 of the VSP effect it would be close to that of the higher affinity Kv7.347.

TASK-2 has also been shown to take part in the short term cell volume regulation process known as RVD, regulatory volume decrease36. A role for TASK-2 in RVD has been demonstrated in kidney tubule cells63 and in T and B immune-cells64,65. RVD occurs by acute parallel modulation of K+ and Cl− conductances66 but the mechanism linking changes in cell volume to ion channel modulation have remained elusive. Neutralisation of K297 (together with K298) markedly decreases the sensitivity of TASK-2 to changes in cell volume39. This suggests that a modulation of the TASK-2-PI(4,5)P2 interaction might be important in commanding TASK-2 function in RVD. A possible mechanism for this action is that suggested for the voltage-dependent K+ channel made up by the complex KCNQ1/KCNE167 that responds to changes in cell volume through dilution/concentration of intracellular polyamines and Mg2+ owing to their screening PI(4,5)P2 negative charges. A similar mechanism would explain the osmosensitivity necessary for TASK-2 to play a role in RVD. The EC50 for PI(4,5)P2 effect on KCNQ1/KCNE1 has been reported at 5 μM68, much lower than that for TASK-2 measured here at 35 μM. More importantly however, and discussed above, TASK-2 interaction with membrane PI(4,5)P2 is probably relatively weak as evidenced by competition with neomycin. On that basis we would postulate a high sensitivity of TASK-2 to native cellular polycationic compounds such as polyamines that could couple volume changes to channel activity though modulation of TASK-2-PI(4,5)P2 interaction.

In conclusion, TASK-2 is an example of a K2P channel that depends on an interaction with membrane PI(4,5)P2 for activity and that is capable of being dynamically modulated by changes in the levels of this phospholipid in the membrane or by conditions that alter its interaction with the channel. Mutagenesis experiments suggest that interaction occurs with TASK-2 C-terminus where three basic aminoacids are identified as potentially important in a putative binding site. The apparent affinity of TASK-2 for membrane PI(4,5)P2 is low and it is conceivable that changing competition by intracellular polycationic compounds might mediate the previously reported sensitivity of TASK-2 to changes in cell volume. A decrease in PI(4,5)P2 by activation of Gq-PCRs is also probably responsible for TASK-2 inhibition. More generally, the dependence of TASK-2 upon PI(4,5)P2 might be important in the various physiological and pathophysiological scenarios in which it is proposed to be involved.

Methods

Plasmid construction and transfections

Mus musculus TASK-2 (GenBank accession No. AF319542) plasmid was that obtained from mouse kidney36. The cDNAs was subcloned into the pCR3.1 vector. Mutations were made by site-directed mutagenesis into the pCR3.1 vector as previously described69 and confirmed by sequencing. HEK-293 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) and F12 Ham’s medium at a 1:1 ratio and supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum at 37 °C in 5% CO2. For electrophysiological experiments, transient transfections were performed by electroporation, using CD8 cotransfection to identify effectively transfected cells. The CD8 antigen was revealed with microspheres (Dynabeads) coated with an anti-CD8 antigen. Experiments were performed 4–8 h after electroporation. In experiments with the voltage-sensitive phosphatase TASK-2 or its mutants were co-electroporated with a pCR3.1-DrVSP-IRES-CD8 vector.

Electrophysiological assays

Transiently transfected HEK-293 cells in 35 mm Petri dishes were transferred to the stage of an inverted microscope for study. There they were continuously superfused with a bathing solution containing (in mM): 67.5 Na2SO4, 4 KCl, 1 K gluconate, 2 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 105 sucrose, and 10 Hepes/Tris (pH 7.5) (standard solution). A high K+ solution was obtained by equimolar replacement of Na+ by K+. The pipette solution contained (mM) 8 KCl, 132 potassium gluconate, 1 MgCl2, 10 EGTA, 1 Na3ATP, 0.1 GTP, 10 HEPES/Tris, pH 7.4. Standard whole-cell, patch-clamp recordings were performed as described elsewhere70. All our whole-cell experiments keep both intra- and extracellular chloride at 10 mM and although currents were measured at several potentials, data mostly reported are those obtained at 0 mV. Potentials were corrected for liquid junction shifts. Acquisition and analysis was done with Clampfit 9.0 (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA, USA). Further data analysis was done using the curve fitting features of SigmaPlot v. 12 (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).

Recordings in the inside-out isolated patch configuration were performed in the gap-free mode at −60 mV. The inside aspect of the patch was bathed with a solution containing in mM: 10 KCl, 10 Glucose, 1 MgCl2, 10 EGTA, 1 Na3ATP, 0.1 GTP, 6.8 g/100 ml Sucrose, 10 Hepes/Tris, pH 7.4. The pipette contained in mM: 140 KCl, 10 Glucose, 6.8 g/100 ml Sucrose, 10 Hepes/Tris pH 7.4. For isolated patches, borosilicate capillaries (Harvard Apparatus GC150F-10 1.5 ODx0.86 ID) were fire polished to 4–5 MΩ and covered in beeswax. Acquisition was at 10 kHz with filter at 3 kHz (4-pole Bessel) and analysis was done with Clampfit 9.0 (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA, USA). Traces shown are prints from crude Clampfit screen shots and quantification was done using the average currents were calculated at intervals using Clampfit after baseline adjustment.

Materials

MTSET, [2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl] methanethiosulfonate chloride was obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology; phosphatidylinositol 4-monophosphate diC8, phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate diC8, phosphatidylinositol 3,4-bisphosphate diC8, and phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate diC8, as well as 1,2 dioctanoyl-sn-glycerol, were purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids. All other chemicals were purchase from Sigma Chemical Company.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Niemeyer, M. I. et al. Phosphatidylinositol (4,5)-bisphosphate dynamically regulates the K2P background K+ channel TASK-2. Sci. Rep. 7, 45407; doi: 10.1038/srep45407 (2017).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep45407-s1.pdf (1.5MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by FONDECYT grant 1140153. Travel support came from ECOS-Conicyt grant C14S01. The Centro de Estudios Científicos (CECs) is supported by the Centres of Excellence Base Financing Programme of Conicyt. We are grateful to Drs Jürgen Daut (Marburg), Yasushi Okamura (Osaka) and Stéphane A. Laporte (Montréal) for kindly providing the cDNAs for TASK-3, DrVSP and AT1 receptor respectively.

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Author Contributions M.I.N., L.P.C. and F.V.S. conceived the study; M.I.N., L.P.C. and M.P. performed experiments; M.I.N., L.P.C., J.T. and F.V.S. analysed data and wrote the manuscript.

References

  1. Logothetis D. E. et al. Phosphoinositide control of membrane protein function: a frontier led by studies on ion channels. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 77, 81–104 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hilgemann D. W. & Ball R. Regulation of cardiac Na+, Ca2+ exchange and KATP potassium channels by PIP2. Science 273, 956–959 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Suh B. C. & Hille B. PIP2 is a necessary cofactor for ion channel function: how and why? Annu. Rev. Biophys. 37, 175–195 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hille B., Dickson E. J., Kruse M., Vivas O. & Suh B. C. Phosphoinositides regulate ion channels. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1851, 844–856 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hansen S. B. Lipid agonism: The PIP2 paradigm of ligand-gated ion channels. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1851, 620–628 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Enyedi P. & Czirják G. Molecular background of leak K+ currents: two-pore domain potassium channels. Physiol. Rev. 90, 559–605 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sepúlveda F. V., Cid L. P., Teulon J. & Niemeyer M. I. Molecular aspects of structure, gating and physiology of pH-sensitive background K2P and Kir K+-transport channels. Physiol. Rev. 95, 179–217 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Renigunta V., Schlichthorl G. & Daut J. Much more than a leak: structure and function of K2P-channels. Pflügers Arch. 467, 867–894 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Feliciangeli S., Chatelain F. C., Bichet D. & Lesage F. The family of K2P channels: salient structural and functional properties. J. Physiol. 593, 2587–2603 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mathie A. Neuronal two-pore-domain potassium channels and their regulation by G protein-coupled receptors. J. Physiol. 578, 377–385 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chemin J. et al. Mechanisms underlying excitatory effects of group I metabotropic glutamate receptors via inhibition of 2P domain K+ channels. EMBO J. 22, 5403–5411 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Talley E. M., Lei Q., Sirois J. E. & Bayliss D. A. TASK-1, a two-pore domain K+ channel, is modulated by multiple neurotransmitters in motoneurons. Neuron 25, 399–410 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Talley E. M. & Bayliss D. A. Modulation of TASK-1 (Kcnk3) and TASK-3 (Kcnk9) potassium channels: volatile anesthetics and neurotransmitters share a molecular site of action. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 17733–17742 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lesage F., Terrenoire C., Romey G. & Lazdunski M. Human TREK2, a 2P domain mechano-sensitive K+ channel with multiple regulations by polyunsaturated fatty acids, lysophospholipids, and Gs, Gi, and Gq protein-coupled receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 28398–28405 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Murbartian J., Lei Q., Sando J. J. & Bayliss D. A. Sequential phosphorylation mediates receptor- and kinase-induced inhibition of TREK-1 background potassium channels. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 30175–30184 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Enyeart J. J., Danthi S. J., Liu H. & Enyeart J. A. Angiotensin II inhibits bTREK-1 K+ channels in adrenocortical cells by separate Ca2+- and ATP hydrolysis-dependent mechanisms. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 30814–30828 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Czirják G., Toth Z. E. & Enyedi P. The two-pore domain K+ channel, TRESK, is activated by the cytoplasmic calcium signal through calcineurin. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 18550–18558 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Enyedi P. & Czirják G. Properties, regulation, pharmacology, and functions of the K2P channel, TRESK. Pflügers Arch. 467, 945–958 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lopes C. M. et al. PIP2 hydrolysis underlies agonist-induced inhibition and regulates voltage gating of two-pore domain K+ channels. J. Physiol. 564, 117–129 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lindner M., Leitner M. G., Halaszovich C. R., Hammond G. R. & Oliver D. Probing the regulation of TASK potassium channels by PI4,5P(2) with switchable phosphoinositide phosphatases. J. Physiol. 589, 3149–3162 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Chen X. et al. Inhibition of a background potassium channel by Gq protein a-subunits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 3422–3427 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sandoz G., Bell S. C. & Isacoff E. Y. Optical probing of a dynamic membrane interaction that regulates the TREK1 channel. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 2605–2610 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wilke B. U. et al. Diacylglycerol mediates regulation of TASK potassium channels by Gq-coupled receptors. Nat. Commun. 5, 5540 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Cid L. P. et al. TASK-2: a K2P K+ channel with complex regulation and diverse physiological functions. Front. Physiol. 4, 198 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. López-Cayuqueo K. I., Peña-Münzenmayer G., Niemeyer M. I., Sepúlveda F. V. & Cid L. P. TASK-2 K2P K+ channel: thoughts about gating and its fitness to physiological function. Pflügers Arch. 467, 1043–1053 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Warth R. et al. Proximal renal tubular acidosis in TASK2 K+ channel-deficient mice reveals a mechanism for stabilizing bicarbonate transport. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 8215–8220 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gestreau C. et al. Task2 potassium channels set central respiratory CO2 and O2 sensitivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 2325–2330 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wang S. et al. TASK-2 Channels Contribute to pH Sensitivity of Retrotrapezoid Nucleus Chemoreceptor Neurons. J. Neurosci. 33, 16033–16044 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Guyenet P. G. et al. Proton detection and breathing regulation by the retrotrapezoid nucleus. J. Physiol. 594, 1529–1551 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Cazals Y. et al. KCNK5 channels mostly expressed in cochlear outer sulcus cells are indispensable for hearing. Nat. Commun. 6, 8780 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Toncheva D. et al. NGS nominated CELA1, HSPG2, and KCNK5 as candidate genes for predisposition to Balkan endemic nephropathy. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 920723 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Veale E. L. & Mathie A. Aristolochic acid, a plant extract used in the treatment of pain and linked to Balkan Endemic Nephropathy, is a regulator of K2P channels. Br. J. Pharmacol. 173, 1639–1652 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Reed A. P., Bucci G., Abd-Wahab F. & Tucker S. J. Dominant-negative effect of a missense variant in the TASK-2 (KCNK5) K+ channel associated with Balkan Endemic Nephropathy. PLoS One 11, e0156456 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Bittner S. et al. Expression of K2P5.1 potassium channels on CD4+ T lymphocytes correlates with disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Arthritis. Res. Ther. 13, R21 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Nakakura S. et al. Pathophysiological significance of the two-pore domain K+ channel K2P5.1 in splenic CD4(+)CD25(−) T cell subset from a chemically-induced murine inflammatory bowel disease model. Front. Physiol. 6, 299 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Niemeyer M. I., Cid L. P., Barros L. F. & Sepúlveda F. V. Modulation of the two-pore domain acid-sensitive K+ channel TASK-2 (KCNK5) by changes in cell volume. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 43166–43174 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Niemeyer M. I. et al. Neutralization of a single arginine residue gates open a two-pore domain, alkali-activated K+ channel. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 666–671 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Niemeyer M. I., Cid L. P., Peña-Münzenmayer G. & Sepúlveda F. V. Separate gating mechanisms mediate the regulation of K2P potassium channel TASK-2 by intra- and extracellular pH. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 16467–16475 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Añazco C. et al. G protein modulation of K2P potassium channel TASK-2: A role of basic residues in the C-terminus domain. Pflügers Arch. 465, 1715–1726 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Fan Z. & Makielski J. C. Anionic phospholipids activate ATP-sensitive potassium channels. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 5388–5395 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Piechotta P. L. et al. The pore structure and gating mechanism of K2P channels. EMBO J. 30, 3607–3619 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Suh B. C. & Hille B. Recovery from muscarinic modulation of M current channels requires phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate synthesis. Neuron 35, 507–520 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Suh B. C., Horowitz L. F., Hirdes W., Mackie K. & Hille B. Regulation of KCNQ2/KCNQ3 current by G protein cycling: the kinetics of receptor-mediated signaling by Gq. J. Gen. Physiol. 123, 663–683 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Falkenburger B. H., Jensen J. B. & Hille B. Kinetics of PIP2 metabolism and KCNQ2/3 channel regulation studied with a voltage-sensitive phosphatase in living cells. J. Gen. Physiol. 135, 99–114 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Hughes S., Marsh S. J., Tinker A. & Brown D. A. PIP2-dependent inhibition of M-type (Kv7.2/7.3) potassium channels: direct on-line assessment of PIP2 depletion by Gq-coupled receptors in single living neurons. Pflügers Arch. 455, 115–124 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Hossain M. I. et al. Enzyme domain affects the movement of the voltage sensor in ascidian and zebrafish voltage-sensing phosphatases. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 18248–18259 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Rjasanow A., Leitner M. G., Thallmair V., Halaszovich C. R. & Oliver D. Ion channel regulation by phosphoinositides analyzed with VSPs - PI(4,5)P2 affinity, phosphoinositide selectivity, and PI(4,5)P2 pool accessibility. Front. Pharmacol. 6, 127 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Du X. et al. Characteristic interactions with phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate determine regulation of kir channels by diverse modulators. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 37271–37281 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Li Y., Gamper N., Hilgemann D. W. & Shapiro M. S. Regulation of Kv7 (KCNQ) K+ channel open probability by phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate. J. Neurosci. 25, 9825–9835 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Kavran J. M. et al. Specificity and promiscuity in phosphoinositide binding by pleckstrin homology domains. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 30497–30508 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Lopes C. M. et al. Alterations in conserved Kir channel-PIP2 interactions underlie channelopathies. Neuron 34, 933–944 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Balla T. Phosphoinositides: tiny lipids with giant impact on cell regulation. Physiol. Rev. 93, 1019–1137 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Di Paolo G. & De Camilli P. Phosphoinositides in cell regulation and membrane dynamics. Nature 443, 651–657 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Chemin J. et al. Up- and down-regulation of the mechano-gated K2P channel TREK-1 by PIP2 and other membrane phospholipids. Pflügers Arch. 455, 97–103 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Dedman A. et al. The mechano-gated K2P channel TREK-1. Eur. Biophys. J. 38, 293–303 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhang H. et al. PIP2 activates KCNQ channels, and its hydrolysis underlies receptor-mediated inhibition of M currents. Neuron 37, 963–975 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Millar J. A. et al. A functional role for the two-pore domain potassium channel TASK-1 in cerebellar granule neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 3614–3618 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Hansen S. B., Tao X. & MacKinnon R. Structural basis of PIP2 activation of the classical inward rectifier K+ channel Kir2.2. Nature 477, 495–498 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Whorton M. R. & MacKinnon R. Crystal structure of the mammalian GIRK2 K+ channel and gating regulation by G proteins, PIP2, and sodium. Cell 147, 199–208 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Whorton M. R. & MacKinnon R. X-ray structure of the mammalian GIRK2-betagamma G-protein complex. Nature 498, 190–197 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Rapedius M. et al. Control of pH and PIP2 gating in heteromeric Kir4.1/Kir5.1 channels by H-Bonding at the helix-bundle crossing. Channels (Austin) 1, 327–330 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Tucker S. J. & Baukrowitz T. How highly charged anionic lipids bind and regulate ion channels. J. Gen. Physiol. 131, 431–438 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Barriere H. et al. Role of TASK2 potassium channels regarding volume regulation in primary cultures of mouse proximal tubules. J. Gen. Physiol. 122, 177–190 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Bobak N. et al. Volume regulation of murine T lymphocytes relies on voltage-dependent and two-pore domain potassium channels. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1808, 2036–2044 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Andronic J. et al. Identification of two-pore domain potassium channels as potent modulators of osmotic volume regulation in human T lymphocytes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1828, 699–707 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Jentsch T. J. VRACs and other ion channels and transporters in the regulation of cell volume and beyond. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 293–307 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Piron J. et al. KCNE1-KCNQ1 osmoregulation by interaction of phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate with Mg2+ and polyamines. J. Physiol. 588, 3471–3483 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Li Y. et al. KCNE1 enhances phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) sensitivity of IKs to modulate channel activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 9095–9100 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Cid L. P., Niemeyer M. I., Ramírez A. & Sepúlveda F. V. Splice variants of a ClC-2 chloride channel with differing functional characteristics. Am. J. Physiol. 279, C1198–C1210 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Díaz M. & Sepúlveda F. V. Characterisation of Ca2+-dependent inwardly rectifying K+ currents in HeLa cells. Pflügers Arch. 430, 168–180 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep45407-s1.pdf (1.5MB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES