Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2017 Mar 6;114(12):3228–3233. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1613237114

Neonatal CX26 removal impairs neocortical development and leads to elevated anxiety

Xin Su a,1, Jing-Jing Chen a,1, Lin-Yun Liu a, Qian Huang a, Li-Zhao Zhang a, Xiao-Yang Li a, Xiang-Nan He b, Wenlian Lu b, Shan Sun c, Huawei Li c, Yong-Chun Yu a,d,2
PMCID: PMC5373364  PMID: 28265099

Significance

It has long been postulated that the formation of electrically coupled neuronal domains guides the emergence of chemically transmitting neuronal connections in the developing neocortex. However, whether electrical coupling broadly contributes to in vivo neocortical circuit development and animal behavior remains largely unknown. Here, we demonstrate that specific deletion of Connexin 26 (CX26) in neocortical excitatory neurons around birth significantly reduces the frequency and size of spontaneous network oscillations. CX26 deletion at early, but not late, postnatal stages, impairs dendritic morphology and excitatory synapse development. Moreover, CX26-conditional knockout (CX26-cKO) mice exhibit increased anxiety-like behavior. Our data suggest that transient electrical coupling between excitatory neurons is critical for proper development and function of the neocortex.

Keywords: CX26, development, anxiety, neocortex

Abstract

Electrical coupling between excitatory neurons in the neocortex is developmentally regulated. It is initially prominent but eliminated at later developmental stages when chemical synapses emerge. However, it remains largely unclear whether early electrical coupling networks broadly contribute to neocortical circuit formation and animal behavior. Here, we report that neonatal electrical coupling between neocortical excitatory neurons is critical for proper neuronal development, synapse formation, and animal behavior. Conditional deletion of Connexin 26 (CX26) in the superficial layer excitatory neurons of the mouse neocortex around birth significantly reduces spontaneous firing activity and the frequency and size of spontaneous network oscillations at postnatal day 5–6. Moreover, CX26-conditional knockout (CX26-cKO) neurons tend to have simpler dendritic trees and lower spine density compared with wild-type neurons. Importantly, early, but not late, postnatal deletion of CX26, decreases the frequency of miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSCs) in both young and adult mice, whereas miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents (mIPSCs) were unaffected. Furthermore, CX26-cKO mice exhibit increased anxiety-related behavior. These results suggest that electrical coupling between excitatory neurons at early postnatal stages is a critical step for neocortical development and function.


During neocortical development, gap junction-mediated electrical coupling plays a critical role in various developmental processes, including neuronal migration (1, 2), synaptogenesis (3), and synchronous firing (4, 5). It is generally believed that gap junction-mediated communication between excitatory neurons during development is required for the formation of chemical synapses (6). For example, we previously showed that sister excitatory neurons in the neocortex are initially electrically coupled, and blockade of this electrotonic communication impairs the subsequent formation of specific chemical synapses between them in ontogenetic neuronal clones (7), as well as the functional similarity (8). Whereas these studies have provided crucial insights into the role of gap junctions in the precise microcircuit assembly of excitatory neurons and functional organization of the neocortex, whether electrical coupling-mediated networks contribute to the overall development of the neocortex and animal behavior remains largely unknown.

Electrical coupling networks among excitatory neurons in the neocortex are developmentally regulated. Electrical couplings are the morphological correlates of dye coupling and low resistance intercellular pathways (9). Functional electrical coupling between excitatory neurons has been abundantly observed at late embryonic and early postnatal stages (10, 11). As electrical synapses approach the time point of their elimination, chemical connections between excitatory neurons begin to emerge, illustrating a sequential developmental time course for the two types of connections among excitatory neurons (6, 11).

Electrical coupling is mediated by the gap junction channel, formed by two sets of hexameric hemichannels, each composed of six connexin (CX) proteins. The gap junction channel directly connects the cytoplasm of two neighboring cells and allows the nonselective exchange of ions and small organic molecules (12). The types of connexins in a channel can influence channel properties such as conductance and selectivity (13). From a family of over 20 genes in mammals, only a handful of connexins have been found to be expressed in vertebrate neurons, including CX26, CX36, CX45, CX50, CX30.2, and CX31.1 (14). Converging evidence suggests that electrical coupling between the developing excitatory neurons in the neocortex is primarily mediated by CX26 proteins (1, 7, 15). However, whether CX26-mediated electrical coupling regulates the development and synapse formation of excitatory neurons in vivo remains unclear. In addition, although functional electrical coupling between excitatory neurons is largely eliminated after the first postnatal week, CX26 proteins remain abundantly present in excitatory neurons even at the mature stage (13, 16). Therefore, the precise role of CX26 proteins in excitatory neurons after the disappearance of electrical coupling is unclear. Moreover, whereas it has long been hypothesized that electrical couplings among excitatory neurons contribute to synchronized oscillatory activity during the developing neocortex, which may facilitate chemical synapse formation and neuronal circuit assembly (5, 17), this hypothesis has never been experimentally validated.

It has been proposed that transient electrical coupling at early postnatal stages critically influences the functional organization of the adult cortex (18). For example, disruption of gap junction coupling by viral expression of a dominant-negative mutant of CX26 or by daily administration of a gap junction blocker, carbenoxolone, during the first postnatal week greatly diminished the orientation of sister excitatory neurons in the adult mouse visual cortex, suggesting that the ontogenetic-to-functional column maturation requires intercellular communication through gap junctions (8). Furthermore, the questions remain as to whether transient electrical coupling-mediated networks impact adult behavior.

In this study, we used an inducible conditional knockout (cKO) strategy to delete CX26 specifically in excitatory neurons of the mouse cortex at early embryonic day 18 to postnatal day 2 (E18–P2) or late (P7–8) postnatal stages, and investigated whether transient electrical coupling regulates circuit formation in excitatory neurons and affects adult mouse behavior.

Results

Conditional Deletion of CX26 in Excitatory Neurons at Early Postnatal Stages.

Previous studies including ours showed that CX26 is a major connexin isoform that mediates electrical coupling between excitatory neurons in the developing neocortex (1, 7, 15). Moreover, previous study demonstrated CX26-mediated gap junction adhesion is necessary for radial migration in embryonic neocortex (1). To specifically remove CX26 from excitatory neurons of the cortex at early postnatal stages, we generated the inducible and conditional CX26 knockout mouse line (CX26-cKO mice, Emx1-CreER+/−; CX26fl/fl) by crossing the floxed CX26 allele-bearing mouse strain (CX26fl/fl) to a mouse line expressing the tamoxifen-inducible form of Cre recombinase (CreER) driven by the endogenous Emx1 promoter (Emx1-CreER mouse) (Fig. 1A). CX26 was deleted at early postnatal stages by a single injection of tamoxifen (0.025 mg/g) intraperitoneally (i.p.) into E18.5 pregnant mice, followed by three s.c. doses to P1–2 pups (0.05 mg/g), once every 12 h (Fig. 1B). CX26 protein level in the neocortex of P6 CX26-cKO mice was first examined by Western blot and found to be significantly reduced compared with that in CX26-WT littermates (Emx1-CreER−/−; CX26fl/fl) (Fig. 1 C and D and SI Appendix, Table S1). These data demonstrate that tamoxifen treatment around birth is able to effectively reduce endogenous CX26 protein expression in the neocortex at early postnatal stages. To specifically label the cells in which CX26 was conditionally deleted, we generated Emx1-CreER+/−; CX26+/+; Rosa26-tdTomato mice (CX26-WT) and Emx1-CreER+/−; CX26fl/fl; Rosa26-tdTomato littermates (CX26-cKO) (SI Appendix, Fig. S1A). This breeding strategy permits cells that undergo CX26 deletion to express tdTomato (SI Appendix, Fig. S1B). To further test the functional impairment of gap junction communication after CX26-cKO, we injected neurobiotin dye into tdTomato-positive (tdTomato+) cells and then counted the number of neighboring dye-coupled cells at P4. We found that the average number of cells coupled to one tdTomato+ cell was significantly lower in CX26-cKO mice than in CX26-WT mice (Fig. 1 EG and SI Appendix, Table S1), suggesting that deletion of CX26 impaired functional gap junction communication at early postnatal stages.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

CX26 conditional knockout in the neocortex at early postnatal stages. (A) Illustration of mouse breeding strategy to obtain CX26-WT (Emx1-CreER−/−; CX26fl/fl) mice and CX26-cKO (Emx1-CreER+/−; CX26fl/fl) littermates. (B) Schematic representation of tamoxifen administration protocol. TM, tamoxifen injection. (C) Western blot of protein samples from P6 CX26-WT and CX26-cKO neocortex. β-Tubulin served as the loading control. (D) Densitometric analysis of Western blot bands (n = 5 for each group). (E) Representative images of dye-coupled cells in the CX26-WT and CX26-cKO neocortex at P4. Red arrowheads indicate neurobiotin-filled tdTomato+ cells, and white arrowheads indicate dye-coupled cells. (Scale bar, 40 µm.) (F) Probability distribution of the number of coupled cells (CX26-WT, n = 24 cells from five mice; CX26-cKO, n = 18 from five mice). (G) Quantification of the average number of dye-coupled cells in the CX26-WT and CX26-cKO neocortex at P4. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.01, two-tailed unpaired t test.

To analyze the distribution of cKO cells, we crossed the Emx1-CreER line with a loxP-flanked Rosa26reporter-tdTomato line (Ai14) (19). After tamoxifen treatment (as described above), the distribution of tdTomato+ cells was examined at P10, with a majority being found in the cortex as well as the hippocampus (SI Appendix, Fig. S2A). In this study, we focused on the cortex. We observed tdTomato+ cells mainly in the superficial layers (layer 2/3) of the neocortex (SI Appendix, Fig. S2 B and C). To characterize the tdTomato+ cell type, we performed immunohistochemical staining against neuronal nuclei (NeuN), a marker for neurons in the cortex, and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), a marker for inhibitory neurons (20). We found that almost all tdTomato+ cells expressed NeuN, but none expressed GABA (SI Appendix, Fig. S2 D and E), indicating that tdTomato+ cells are mainly glutamatergic excitatory neurons in the cortex. Moreover, ∼3% of tdTomato+ cells were astrocytes (2.9 ± 1.2%, n = 3 mice), indicating that CX26 genes were removed in very few astrocytes by this knockout strategy. To determine the proportion of tdTomato+ excitatory neurons (tdTomato+/NeuN+ cells) among total excitatory neurons (NeuN+/GABA cells), we systematically analyzed the fraction of tdTomato+/NeuN+ cells among NeuN+/GABA cells in the cortex and found that ∼50% of total excitatory neurons in layer 2/3 of the neocortex (NeuN+/GABA) were labeled by tdTomato (SI Appendix, Fig. S2F and Table S2). It is generally believed that the migration of excitatory neurons in the neocortex stops at P7 (21). We found that deletion of CX26 did not affect the laminar distribution of tdTomato+ CX26-cKO neurons compared with tdTomato+ CX26-WT neurons in the neocortex at P6 (SI Appendix, Fig. S1 B and C), indicating that deletion of CX26 around birth did not impair the migration of excitatory neurons.

Deletion of CX26 Reduces Spontaneous Network Oscillations at Early Postnatal Stages.

Synchronous spontaneous activity has been found throughout the developing neocortex and suggested to play a critical role in neocortical development (3, 5, 22). Thus, we speculated that gap junction-mediated electrical coupling between neocortical excitatory neurons at early postnatal stages promotes synchronous activity, which in turn facilitates neuronal development and synapse formation (Hebbian theory). To test this hypothesis, we examined spontaneous calcium activities and their synchronization in layer 2/3 neurons of the somatosensory cortex with large-scale calcium imaging (about 300 cells per movie on average) at P5–6. A highly sensitive fluorescent calcium indicator dye, Cal-520 acetoxymethyl ester (Cal-520 AM) (23), was loaded into acute brain slices, and calcium transients in response to action potentials (APs) were recorded at individual cell resolution (SI Appendix, Fig. S3 and Movie S1). Spontaneous activities and their synchronization were detected and analyzed with custom-made software (Materials and Methods and SI Appendix, Fig. S3), which automatically generated the raster plots of the activity and the histogram plots of the fraction of active cells (Fig. 2 A and B). Active cells are neurons exhibiting at least one calcium transient within the period of recording (24). We analyzed the proportion of active cells, which was defined as the percentage of active cells among all calcium dye-loaded cells in one field, and the frequency of spontaneous activity of active cells, which was defined as the number of calcium transients per second, as previously reported (25). We found that the mean proportion of active cells in CX26-cKO mice was significantly lower than in CX26-WT mice (Fig. 2C and SI Appendix, Table S3). In addition, the mean frequency of spontaneous activity of active cells in CX26-cKO mice was significantly lower than that in CX26-WT mice (Fig. 2D and SI Appendix, Table S3). These data suggested that CX26-mediated electrical coupling between excitatory neurons promotes the spontaneous activity of neocortical cells at early postnatal stages.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Large-scale calcium imaging of spontaneous network oscillations in P5–6 neocortical slices. (A and B) Raster plots of the onset of calcium events in a representative movie in the CX26-WT (A) and CX26-cKO (B) neocortex. The lower plots represent the average temporal profile of the fraction of cells sequentially activated in the same network. (C) The percentage of active cells. (D) The cumulative probability of calcium transient intervals and mean frequency of calcium transients (Inset). (E) The proportion of oscillating cells among active cells. (F) The mean frequency of spontaneous network oscillations. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, two-tailed unpaired t test.

We next analyzed spontaneous network oscillations at P5–6. The spontaneous network oscillations were defined as at least 10% of active cells having calcium transients within a 500-ms time window (Materials and Methods) (26, 27). We found that spontaneous network oscillations in CX26-WT brain slices occurred at ∼0.1 Hz frequency and the synchronicity duration was less than 200 ms (Fig. 2A, Lower). Interestingly, the proportion of cells involved in the spontaneous network oscillations (oscillating cells) among the total active cells in CX26-cKO mice was significantly lower than that in CX26-WT mice (Fig. 2E and SI Appendix, Table S3), indicating that deletion of CX26 reduces the size of network oscillations. In addition, the frequency of spontaneous network oscillations was significantly reduced in CX26-cKO mice compared with CX26-WT mice (Fig. 2F and SI Appendix, Table S3). Together, these results suggest that CX26-mediated electrical coupling between excitatory neurons strongly contributes to spontaneous neocortical network oscillations at early postnatal stages.

Deletion of CX26 Affects Dendritic Morphology and Spine Density of Excitatory Neurons.

To investigate whether CX26 proteins play a role in dendritogenesis in excitatory neurons, we systematically analyzed the dendritic morphology of individual layer 2/3 tdTomato+ neurons (the distance from the cell body to the bottom of cortical layer 1 is ∼150 µm) in the somatosensory cortex of CX26-WT and CX26-cKO mice at P15–17 and P42–45 by intracellular filling with lucifer yellow (LY). The total dendritic length (TDL), the number of terminals, the number of bifurcations, and Sholl analysis of the dendritic branch (the number of dendritic branch intersections with concentric circles of increasing radii from the soma) were quantified after 3D morphological reconstruction (Fig. 3A). Compared with CX26-WT mice, tdTomato+ cells from CX26-cKO mice had much simpler dendritic morphologies, with a significant decrease in the TDL, the numbers of dendritic terminals, and dendritic bifurcations at both P15–17 and P42–45 (Fig. 3 BD and SI Appendix, Table S4). Similarly, Sholl analysis revealed a significant decrease of dendritic arbor complexity in CX26-cKO neurons at P15–17 and P42–45 (Fig. 3 E and F). Furthermore, the density of dendritic spines on the segment of the second branches (about 50 µm away from the cell body) of CX26-cKO neurons was significantly lower than that of CX26-WT neurons at P15–17 and P42–45 (Fig. 3 G and H and SI Appendix, Table S4), whereas the spine length exhibited no significant difference (Fig. 3I and SI Appendix, Table S4). Together, these data suggest that CX26 proteins at early postnatal stages are crucial for normal dendritogenesis and synaptogenesis in neocortical excitatory neurons.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

CX26 is required for normal dendritogenesis and spinogenesis in layer 2/3 excitatory neurons in young and adult mice. (A) Neurolucida 3D reconstruction of layer 2/3 tdTomato+ excitatory neurons in CX26-WT and CX26-cKO neocortex at P15 and P45. (Scale bars, 50 µm.) (B–D) Quantification of total dendritic length (TDL) (B), the number of dendritic terminals (C), and the number of bifurcations (D). (E and F) Sholl analysis of the number of dendritic intersections in P15–17 (E) and P42–45 (F) mice. (G) Confocal images showing dendritic spines of layer 2/3 excitatory neurons. (Scale bars, 2 µm.) (H and I) Quantitative analysis of average dendritic spine density (H) and spine length (I). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, two-tailed unpaired t test.

Deletion of CX26 During the Period of Active Electrical Coupling Impairs Excitatory Synapse Formation.

To examine whether CX26 deletion affects synapse formation, we performed whole-cell patch-clamp recordings from layer 2/3 tdTomato+ neurons in the somatosensory cortex of CX26-WT and CX26-cKO mice at P15–16 (Fig. 4B). We examined both miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSCs, −60 mV holding potential) and miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents (mIPSCs, +10 mV holding potential) in the same neurons in the presence of tetrodotoxin (TTX, 5 µM) (28) (Fig. 4C). We found that the frequency of mEPSCs of CX26-cKO neurons was significantly lower than that of CX26-WT neurons (Fig. 4F and SI Appendix, Table S5), whereas the peak amplitude of mEPSCs was indistinguishable between CX26-WT and CX26-cKO neurons (Fig. 4G and SI Appendix, Table S5). We did not observe any significant change in mIPSCs (Fig. 4 H and I and SI Appendix, Table S5). Notably, CX26-cKO neurons exhibited normal intrinsic electrophysiological properties at P15–16 and P42–45, including input resistance (Rin), resting membrane potential (RMP), AP threshold, AP amplitude, and AP spiking width (SI Appendix, Fig. S4). To test whether deletion of CX26 affects synapse formation of WT neurons in CX26-cKO mice, we examined both mEPSCs and mIPSCs of tdTomato pyramidal cells in the vicinity of the tdTomato+ neurons from CX26-cKO mice (Fig. 4 D and E). We did not observe any obvious difference in the frequency or amplitude of mEPSCs and mIPSCs between tdTomato neurons in CX26-cKO brain slices and tdTomato+ neurons in CX26-WT brain slices (Fig. 4 F–I and SI Appendix, Table S5). These results suggest that CX26 deletion leads to cell-autonomous defects in excitatory synapse formation.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

CX26 deletion at early postnatal stages impairs excitatory synaptic transmissions in young and adult mice. (A) Schematic representations of tamoxifen administration protocol for CX26-cKO around birth (early cKO) and at P7–8 (late cKO). Recordings were performed in young (P15–16) and adult (P42–45) mice. (B) Differential interference contrast (DIC) image of a representative recorded neuron (Left) with early CX26-cKO at P15. The images at Right show this neuron is tdTomato+ (red) and filled with lucifer yellow (LY, green). (Scale bar, 50 μm.) (C) Representative traces of inward mEPSCs (black, holding at −60 mV) and outward mIPSCs (green, holding at 10 mV) from tdTomato+ neurons in early CX26-cKO and CX26-WT mice. (D) DIC image of a recorded tdTomato pyramid-like neuron (white arrowhead) and a neighboring tdTomato+ neuron (red arrowhead) with early CX26-cKO at P15. The fluorescent images on the right show the tdTomato neuron (white arrowhead) neighboring tdTomato+ neuron (red arrowhead) filled with LY. (Scale bar, 50 μm.) (E) Representative traces of mEPSCs and mIPSCs from tdTomato pyramid-like neurons in early CX26-cKO mice. (F–I) Histograms of the frequency (F) and amplitude (G) of mEPSCs, and the frequency (H) and amplitude (I) of mIPSCs from CX26-WT tdTomato+ neurons (blue), CX26-cKO tdTomato+ neurons (red), and CX26-cKO tdTomato neurons (yellow) at P15–16. (J and K) Histograms of the frequency (J) and amplitude (K) of mEPSCs and mIPSCs from CX26-WT tdTomato+ neurons and CX26-cKO tdTomato+ neurons at P42–45. (L and M) Histograms of the frequency (L) and amplitude (M) of mEPSCs and mIPSCs from layer 2/3 tdTomato+ neurons in late CX26-cKO and CX26-WT mice. [Scale bars in C and E, 10 pA (black, vertical) for mEPSCs, 15 pA (green, vertical) for mIPSCs, 1 s (black, horizontal)]. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, two-tailed unpaired t test.

Because extensive synaptic and dendritic pruning occurs even after P15–16 (29), we further examined mEPSCs/mIPSCs in CX26-WT and CX26-cKO neurons at P42–45 (Fig. 4A, Upper and SI Appendix, Fig. S5A). We found that both the frequency and the peak amplitude of mEPSCs were significantly lower in CX26-cKO neurons than in CX26-WT neurons at P42–45 (Fig. 4 J and K and SI Appendix, Table S5). Moreover, there was not any significant change in mIPSCs at P42–45 (Fig. 4 J and K and SI Appendix, Table S5). These results suggest that CX26 deletion at early postnatal stages impaired excitatory synaptic transmission in both young and adult mice.

Although functional electrical coupling between excitatory neurons was only detected from the late embryonic stages to the first postnatal week (7, 10, 11), accumulated evidence indicates that CX26 proteins are present in excitatory neurons throughout neocortical development (13, 15, 16). To determine whether CX26 proteins in excitatory neurons, after the period of electrical coupling, modulate synaptic transmission, we deleted CX26 from excitatory neurons after the first postnatal week (late cKO, Fig. 4A). Tamoxifen was administered to mice during P7–8 (Fig. 4A). Similar to the results from tamoxifen administration during E18.5–P2 (early cKO), almost all tdTomato+ cells expressed NeuN but not GABA (SI Appendix, Fig. S6), indicating that genetic deletion predominantly occurred in excitatory neurons. We recorded mEPSCs and mIPSCs of tdTomato+ neurons in neocortical layer 2/3 of CX26-WT and CX26 late-cKO mice at P15–16 (SI Appendix, Fig. S5B). Interestingly, CX26 deletion after P7 did not affect the frequency or amplitude of mEPSCs and mIPSCs (Fig. 4 L and M and SI Appendix, Table S5). These results suggest that deletion of CX26 after the first postnatal week—the period of active electrical coupling—does not affect synaptic transmission of excitatory neurons.

Neocortical Deletion of CX26 Leads to Increased Anxiety-Like Behavior.

Our results showed that CX26-mediated gap junction regulates dendrite development and synapse formation in layer 2/3 excitatory neurons. We next examined whether CX26 deletion at early postnatal stages affects adult mouse behavior. No obvious difference in animal growth was observed between the WT and cKO mice, as reflected by the body weight of P40–50 mice (SI Appendix, Fig. S7). We evaluated the anxiety-like behavior in the open field test (OF) and the elevated plus maze test (EPM) (30). In the OF test, mice were exposed to a flat arena during 15 min of spontaneous movement, and the movement path was simultaneously tracked (Fig. 5A). We found that CX26-WT and CX26-cKO mice showed no significant difference in the total distance traveled in the field (Fig. 5B and SI Appendix, Table S6), indicating CX26 deletion did not impair locomotor activity of mice. However, the distance (Fig. 5C and SI Appendix, Table S6) and the time (Fig. 5E and SI Appendix, Table S6) traveled in the center of the open field were significantly reduced in CX26-cKO mice compared with their CX26-WT littermates. Instead, CX26-cKO mice spent more time in the corners of the open field than CX26-WT mice (Fig. 5F and SI Appendix, Table S6), whereas the distance traveled in the corners was not significantly different (Fig. 5D and SI Appendix, Table S6). Moreover, in the EPM test (Fig. 5G), CX26-cKO mice spent significantly less time in the open arms and had significantly smaller number of entries into the open arms than CX26-WT mice during the 5-min task (Fig. 5 H and I and SI Appendix, Table S6). Together, these results suggest that deletion of CX26 at early postnatal stages leads to anxiety-like behavior in adult mice.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

CX26-cKO induces anxiety-like behavior. (A) Schematic of zones in the open field arena and representative traces of mouse movement. (B) Total distance traveled in the open field test. (C and D) Distance traveled in the center (C) and corners (D) of the open field arena. (E and F) Time spent in the center (E) and corners (F) in the open field arena. (G) Schematic of different arms and representative traces of mouse movement in the elevated plus maze test. (H) Time spent in the open arms. (I) Entrances into the open arms during the elevated plus maze test. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n.s. for P > 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, two-tailed unpaired t test.

In addition, no significant differences were observed between CX26-WT and CX26-cKO mice in depression-like behavioral tests, including the tail suspension test (SI Appendix, Fig. S8B); the forced swimming test (SI Appendix, Fig. S8A); learning and memory-associated behavioral tests, including Morris water maze test (SI Appendix, Fig. S9 AD), Y maze test (SI Appendix, Fig. S9 E and F), and fear conditioning test (SI Appendix, Fig. S9 G and H); and motor coordination-associated rotarod test (SI Appendix, Fig. S10).

Discussion

In this study, we took advantage of the Emx1-CreER mice to specifically delete the CX26 gene—a major connexin gene expressed in neocortical excitatory neurons (1, 7, 15)—starting at E18.5. To avoid impairing radial migration of excitatory neurons at embryonic stages (1), we deleted CX26 around birth. Emx1 is selectively expressed in glutamatergic excitatory neurons during late embryonic and early postnatal stages, including the neocortex and hippocampus (31). Indeed, by crossing the Emx1-CreER mice with Ai14 tdTomato-reporter mice, we found that the majority of neocortical tdTomato+ neurons were excitatory neurons, mainly located in the superficial cortical layers. Previous dye-injection experiments in the guinea pig neocortical slices suggested that electrical coupling during the early postnatal stage is mainly observed in the superficial layers (32). Therefore, our conditional knockout strategy provided a valuable approach to investigate the function of global electrical coupling on neuronal development, synapse formation, and animal behavior. Interestingly, we observed that CX26 deletion significantly reduced the frequency of spontaneous calcium activity of excitatory neurons during P5–6. This result is consistent with the previous studies showing that gap junction and hemichannel inhibitors significantly block spontaneous activity in the rodent neonatal neocortex (3) and the human fetal neocortex (33). Given the critical roles of spontaneous calcium activity in the formation and reinforcement of neocortical synapses at the early postnatal days (34), we speculated that CX26 cKO-induced reduction of spontaneous activity affects neocortical development.

More importantly, we found that deletion of CX26 significantly reduced the frequency and size of spontaneous network oscillations. Two distinct network oscillations, cortical early network oscillations (cENOs) and cortical giant depolarizing potentials (cGDPs), were observed in the developing rat cortex (24). The cENOs peak around birth (P0–3) and are no longer present when cGDPs dominate the network (P6–P8) (24), although there is a transition period (P4–5) during which both patterns can be simultaneously recorded in the rat neocortex (24). We found that the network oscillations in the superficial neocortical layers of mice during P5–6 display two features: (i) the frequency is ∼0.1 Hz, and (ii) the synchronicity duration is less than 200 ms. These data suggest that the network oscillations in the superficial neocortical layers of mice during P5–6 are mainly cGDPs (24). cGDPs appear to be strongly dependent on the actions of GABA as they are almost completely blocked by the GABAA receptor antagonist (24). Our study indicates that, besides GABAergic transmission, CX26-mediated electrical coupling between excitatory neurons contributes to the expression of cGDPs at early postnatal stages.

To explicitly examine CX26-cKO versus CX26-WT neurons, we engineered them to express tdTomato fluorescent protein. We found that tdTomato+ neurons in CX26-cKO mice exhibit normal intrinsic electrophysiological properties at both P15–16 and P42–45 (SI Appendix, Fig. S4). Their distribution pattern in the neocortex is similar to that of tdTomato+ neurons in CX26-WT mice. These data suggest that deletion of CX26 around birth does not affect intrinsic electrophysiological maturation and neocortical excitatory neuron migration. However, deletion of CX26 significantly reduces the complexity of dendritic arbor and spine density in both young and adult mice, indicating that CX26-mediated gap junction between excitatory neurons at the early postnatal stage is required for normal dendritogenesis and spinogenesis in excitatory neurons. Furthermore, CX26-cKO neurons exhibit a significant decrease in the frequency of mEPSCs at P15–16 and in both the frequency and the peak amplitude of mEPSCs at P42–45, suggesting that deletion of CX26 at early postnatal stages can prevent, but not delay, excitatory synapse formation. Notably, nearby tdTomato excitatory neurons (tdTomato) in CX26-cKO mice show normal synaptic transmission. These data suggest that deletion of CX26 largely impairs the postsynaptic development (i.e., receiving excitatory synaptic inputs) but not presynaptic activity (i.e., sending excitatory synaptic outputs). Interestingly, removal of CX26 after the first postnatal week did not affect synapse formation in neocortical excitatory neurons (Fig. 4 L and M). Together, these findings provide clear evidence of the crucial role of electrical transmission between excitatory neurons at early postnatal stages in regulating neuronal development and synapse formation in the neocortex.

To further explore the role of global electrical coupling in the functional development of the neocortex, we examined potential behavioral changes associated with the observed dendritic and synaptic alterations in CX26-cKO mice. Interestingly, we found that CX26-cKO mice exhibit an increased level of anxiety-like behavior. It is still unclear how CX26 cKO-induced defects in neocortical development result in anxiety-like behavior. Notably, in these animals, neurons with defective dendritic morphology and synapse development are largely restricted in the superficial layer 2/3. Should CX26 be deleted in all excitatory neurons in the neocortex, we would expect more behavior deficits. Moreover, although our anatomical and functional studies focus on the neocortex, it is possible that certain behavior defects may relate to the hippocampus, as in these animals CX26 is deleted in both the neocortex and hippocampus. The fact that CX26 deficiency triggers synaptic defects and cognitive dysfunction makes it an attractive candidate for further exploration in the context of neurodevelopmental disorders.

Although our study clearly demonstrates the importance of early electrical coupling in regulating neuronal development and synapse formation, the precise mechanisms underlying this regulation remain largely unknown. A variety of mechanisms could account for this regulation. For example, gap junction channels allow the permeation of inorganic ions (Na+, Ca2+, K+, etc.) and small molecules (cAMP and IP3, etc.) (12, 14). These chemical species have been implicated as second messengers and play a role in synapse formation among neocortical excitatory neurons (35). Another potential cellular mechanism could be that electrical coupling in early postnatal stages facilitates synchronized activity, which in turn promotes glutamatergic synapse formation, between neocortical excitatory neurons (Hebbian theory). Indeed, we observed that deletion of CX26 in excitatory neurons around birth significantly reduces the frequency and size of network oscillations (Fig. 3 C and D) and subsequently the frequency of mEPSCs of neocortical excitatory neurons (Fig. 5F). Future efforts along these lines will likely provide insights into the mechanistic link underlying how electrical coupling leads to structural plasticity and changes in synaptic connectivity in the developing neocortex.

Materials and Methods

Animals were maintained and handled followed the guidelines approved by Fudan University Shanghai Medical College. Tamoxifen was intraperitoneally administrated to E18.5 pregnant mice (0.025 mg/g body weight), and s.c. delivered to postnatal pups (0.05 mg/g body weight) by a 10-µL syringe. Detailed information about immunostaining, Western blotting, calcium imaging, electrophysiology, morphological analysis, and behavioral tests is included in SI Appendix. Data are presented as mean ± SEM and n refers to the number of independent experiments. Significant differences are detected when *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary File
Supplementary File
Download video file (3.5MB, mp4)

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Song-Hai Shi for comments on the manuscript, Dr. William D. Richardson for Emx1-CreER mice, Dr. Jian Zuo and Dr. Zhiyong Liu for helpful advice about tamoxifen administration to newborn pups, Jie Yu for Western blotting technical suggestions, and the members of the Y.-C.Y. laboratory for their valuable input. This work was supported by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of China (31471036, 31629004, 31421091, 91332110, and 31271157), the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2014CB942800), the Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China (20130071110065), Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Committee of Shanghai outstanding academic leaders plan (15XD1500700), the Key Project of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission (15JC1400102) (to Y.-C.Y.), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (31200827) (to L.-Y.L.).

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1613237114/-/DCSupplemental.

References

  • 1.Elias LAB, Wang DD, Kriegstein AR. Gap junction adhesion is necessary for radial migration in the neocortex. Nature. 2007;448(7156):901–907. doi: 10.1038/nature06063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Elias LAB, Turmaine M, Parnavelas JG, Kriegstein AR. Connexin 43 mediates the tangential to radial migratory switch in ventrally derived cortical interneurons. J Neurosci. 2010;30(20):7072–7077. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5728-09.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kandler K, Katz LC. Coordination of neuronal activity in developing visual cortex by gap junction-mediated biochemical communication. J Neurosci. 1998;18(4):1419–1427. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-04-01419.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bennett MVL, Zukin RS. Electrical coupling and neuronal synchronization in the Mammalian brain. Neuron. 2004;41(4):495–511. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(04)00043-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yuste R, Nelson DA, Rubin WW, Katz LC. Neuronal domains in developing neocortex: Mechanisms of coactivation. Neuron. 1995;14(1):7–17. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90236-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Todd KL, Kristan WB, Jr, French KA. Gap junction expression is required for normal chemical synapse formation. J Neurosci. 2010;30(45):15277–15285. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2331-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yu Y-C, et al. Preferential electrical coupling regulates neocortical lineage-dependent microcircuit assembly. Nature. 2012;486(7401):113–117. doi: 10.1038/nature10958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Li Y, et al. Clonally related visual cortical neurons show similar stimulus feature selectivity. Nature. 2012;486(7401):118–121. doi: 10.1038/nature11110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Connors BW, Long MA. Electrical synapses in the mammalian brain. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27(1):393–418. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.041002.131128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.He S, Li Z, Ge S, Yu Y-C, Shi S-H. Inside-out radial migration facilitates lineage-dependent neocortical microcircuit assembly. Neuron. 2015;86(5):1159–1166. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ko H, et al. The emergence of functional microcircuits in visual cortex. Nature. 2013;496(7443):96–100. doi: 10.1038/nature12015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Meşe G, Richard G, White TW. Gap junctions: Basic structure and function. J Invest Dermatol. 2007;127(11):2516–2524. doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5700770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bittman K, Becker DL, Cicirata F, Parnavelas JG. Connexin expression in homotypic and heterotypic cell coupling in the developing cerebral cortex. J Comp Neurol. 2002;443(3):201–212. doi: 10.1002/cne.2121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pereda AE. Electrical synapses and their functional interactions with chemical synapses. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014;15(4):250–263. doi: 10.1038/nrn3708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nadarajah B, Jones AM, Evans WH, Parnavelas JG. Differential expression of connexins during neocortical development and neuronal circuit formation. J Neurosci. 1997;17(9):3096–3111. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-09-03096.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dermietzel R, et al. Differential expression of three gap junction proteins in developing and mature brain tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86(24):10148–10152. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.24.10148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Katz LC, Shatz CJ. Synaptic activity and the construction of cortical circuits. Science. 1996;274(5290):1133–1138. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5290.1133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dupont E, Hanganu IL, Kilb W, Hirsch S, Luhmann HJ. Rapid developmental switch in the mechanisms driving early cortical columnar networks. Nature. 2006;439(7072):79–83. doi: 10.1038/nature04264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Madisen L, et al. A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13(1):133–140. doi: 10.1038/nn.2467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ma J, Yao X-H, Fu Y, Yu Y-C. Development of layer 1 neurons in the mouse neocortex. Cereb Cortex. 2014;24(10):2604–2618. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kwan KY, Šestan N, Anton ES. Transcriptional co-regulation of neuronal migration and laminar identity in the neocortex. Development. 2012;139(9):1535–1546. doi: 10.1242/dev.069963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kirkby LA, Sack GS, Firl A, Feller MB. A role for correlated spontaneous activity in the assembly of neural circuits. Neuron. 2013;80(5):1129–1144. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tada M, Takeuchi A, Hashizume M, Kitamura K, Kano M. A highly sensitive fluorescent indicator dye for calcium imaging of neural activity in vitro and in vivo. Eur J Neurosci. 2014;39(11):1720–1728. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Allène C, et al. Sequential generation of two distinct synapse-driven network patterns in developing neocortex. J Neurosci. 2008;28(48):12851–12863. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3733-08.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Owens DF, Kriegstein AR. Patterns of intracellular calcium fluctuation in precursor cells of the neocortical ventricular zone. J Neurosci. 1998;18(14):5374–5388. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-14-05374.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bonifazi P, et al. GABAergic hub neurons orchestrate synchrony in developing hippocampal networks. Science. 2009;326(5958):1419–1424. doi: 10.1126/science.1175509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Feldt Muldoon S, Soltesz I, Cossart R. Spatially clustered neuronal assemblies comprise the microstructure of synchrony in chronically epileptic networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(9):3567–3572. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1216958110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yao X-H, et al. Electrical coupling regulates layer 1 interneuron microcircuit formation in the neocortex. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12229. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Selemon LD. A role for synaptic plasticity in the adolescent development of executive function. Transl Psychiatry. 2013;3(3):e238. doi: 10.1038/tp.2013.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gray JD, et al. Methylphenidate administration to juvenile rats alters brain areas involved in cognition, motivated behaviors, appetite, and stress. J Neurosci. 2007;27(27):7196–7207. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0109-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gorski JA, et al. Cortical excitatory neurons and glia, but not GABAergic neurons, are produced in the Emx1-expressing lineage. J Neurosci. 2002;22(15):6309–6314. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-15-06309.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gutnick MJ, Prince DA. Dye coupling and possible electrotonic coupling in the guinea pig neocortical slice. Science. 1981;211(4477):67–70. doi: 10.1126/science.7444449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Moore AR, et al. Connexin hemichannels contribute to spontaneous electrical activity in the human fetal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(37):E3919–E3928. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1405253111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gonçalves JT, Anstey JE, Golshani P, Portera-Cailliau C. Circuit level defects in the developing neocortex of Fragile X mice. Nat Neurosci. 2013;16(7):903–909. doi: 10.1038/nn.3415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kandler K, Katz LC. Neuronal coupling and uncoupling in the developing nervous system. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1995;5(1):98–105. doi: 10.1016/0959-4388(95)80093-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary File
Supplementary File
Download video file (3.5MB, mp4)

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES