Skip to main content
The Journal of Clinical Investigation logoLink to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
. 2017 Mar 13;127(4):1303–1315. doi: 10.1172/JCI90527

RANKL coordinates multiple osteoclastogenic pathways by regulating expression of ubiquitin ligase RNF146

Yoshinori Matsumoto 1, Jose Larose 1, Oliver A Kent 1, Melissa Lim 1, Adele Changoor 2, Lucia Zhang 2, Yaryna Storozhuk 2, Xiaohong Mao 3, Marc D Grynpas 2, Feng Cong 3, Robert Rottapel 1,4,5,6,7,
PMCID: PMC5373870  PMID: 28287403

Abstract

Bone undergoes continuous remodeling due to balanced bone formation and resorption mediated by osteoblasts and osteoclasts, respectively. Osteoclasts arise from the macrophage lineage, and their differentiation is dependent on RANKL, a member of the TNF family of cytokines. Here, we have provided evidence that RANKL controls the expression of 3BP2, an adapter protein that is required for activation of SRC tyrosine kinase and simultaneously coordinates the attenuation of β-catenin, both of which are required to execute the osteoclast developmental program. We found that RANKL represses the transcription of the E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF146 through an NF-κB–related inhibitory element in the RNF146 promoter. RANKL-mediated suppression of RNF146 results in the stabilization of its substrates, 3BP2 and AXIN1, which consequently triggers the activation of SRC and attenuates the expression of β-catenin, respectively. Depletion of RNF146 caused hypersensitivity to LPS-induced TNF-α production in vivo. RNF146 thus acts as an inhibitory switch to control osteoclastogenesis and cytokine production and may be a control point underlying the pathogenesis of chronic inflammatory diseases.

Introduction

RANKL, a member of the TNF superfamily of cytokines, is an obligate factor required for osteoclast differentiation and survival, lymph node organogenesis, lymphocyte development, and breast epithelial proliferation (16). Mice deficient in RANKL develop severe osteopetrosis due to low bone turnover as a result of absent functional osteoclasts (3). Inhibition of RANKL is now a major therapeutic modality in treating diseases of high bone turnover states, such as osteoporosis.

RANKL signals principally through the 2 transcription factors nuclear factor of activated T cells c1 (NFATc1) and NF-κB (2, 3, 7, 8). In addition to the induction of the osteoclastogenic master transcription factor NFATc1 by RANKL signaling, osteoclast development requires modulation of 2 additional signaling pathways: the coordinated activation of the SRC tyrosine kinase (9, 10) with the simultaneous inhibition of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway (1113).

We previously reported that the adaptor protein 3BP2, which is encoded by the SH3BP2 locus, is essential for normal osteoclast formation, since Sh3bp2–/– mice show reduced bone resorption due to a cell-autonomous osteoclast defect (14). We have shown that 3BP2 nucleates a signaling complex, including SRC, VAV, and SYK, and that SRC activation is impaired in 3BP2-null osteoclasts. Constitutively active SRC rescues defective osteoclastogenesis observed in Sh3bp2–/– macrophages, demonstrating that SRC activation by 3BP2 is essential for normal osteoclast development. 3BP2 ligates the SRC SH3 domain, enforcing an open active configuration of SRC, and is both sufficient and necessary for SRC kinase activation in osteoclasts (14).

3PB2 is subject to tight negative regulation by tankyrase, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) family member. Tankyrase-mediated 3BP2 ribosylation creates a recognition site for the E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF146, leading to its proteasomal degradation (15). Gain-of-function missense mutations in the SH3BP2 gene, which are associated with cherubism, a rare genetic syndrome characterized by bone dysplasia and remodeling of the facial bones (1517), uncouple 3BP2 from tankyrase/RNF146, stabilize 3BP2 protein, and cause hyperactivation of SRC, SYK, and VAV. A genetically engineered mouse model of cherubism harboring one of the cherubism mutations develops hyperactive osteoclasts and a lethal systemic inflammatory disorder characterized by monocytic infiltration of visceral organs and elevated levels of TNF-α (18). Osteoclasts derived from the cherubism mice have increased endogenous 3BP2 protein levels and highly active SRC (15). 3BP2 is thus a concentration-limited adapter protein that controls SRC, VAV, and SYK activity in the monocyte lineage (15), yet little is currently known about how 3BP2 protein levels are controlled during osteoclastogenesis.

The Wnt/β-catenin pathway antagonizes normal osteoclastogenesis. β-Catenin–deficient (Ctnnb1–/–) mice display osteoporosis due to enhanced osteoclast differentiation, whereas mice harboring a constitutively active form of β-catenin are osteopetrotic due to defective osteoclastogenesis (1113). β-Catenin is negatively regulated by a destruction complex that includes AXIN (19), glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β), adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), and the E3 ubiquitin ligase β-TrCP and leads to its phosphorylation, ubiquitylation, and proteasome-dependent degradation (20). RNF146 targets AXIN for ubiquitylation and destruction and is thus a positive regulator of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway (21). The molecular basis for repression of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway during osteoclastogenesis is not known.

We show that RANKL simultaneously coordinates activation of SRC through induction of 3BP2 and suppression of β-catenin in addition to its established role in activating NFATc1. We demonstrate that RANKL represses the expression of the E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF146, which results in the stabilization of 3BP2 (15) and AXIN1 (21), leading to activation of SRC and suppression of β-catenin, respectively. We show that activation of NF-κB by RANKL signaling binds to an inhibitory element in the RNF146 promoter to potently repress RNF146 transcription. Finally, we found that dysfunction of the 3BP2 degradation program controlled by RNF146 in mice results in accelerated osteoclastogenesis and hypersensitivity to LPS induction of TNF-α in macrophages.

Our study has unveiled a pathway downstream of RANKL that links bone resorption to inflammatory states, a condition that underlies human diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis.

Results

RANKL stabilizes 3BP2 and AXIN1 protein levels through suppression of the E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF146.

The 3BP2/SRC (14), Wnt/β-catenin (1113), and RANKL/RANK (2, 3, 7, 8) pathways are all essential for normal osteoclast differentiation. We conjectured that these 3 pathways could be part of a common integrated signaling pathway during osteoclastogenesis. We first examined the effect of RANKL on levels of AXIN1, a negative regulator of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, and observed that AXIN1 protein expression was elevated 3-fold by RANKL in primary murine macrophages without enhancement of Axin1 transcripts (Figure 1A and Supplemental Figure 1A; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI90527DS1). Additionally, RANKL impaired WNT3a-induced stabilization of β-catenin (Figure 1B), suggesting that RANKL-mediated AXIN1 elevation may be functionally coupled to the control of β-catenin. We next examined the effect of RANKL on 3BP2 levels and observed that RANKL also enhanced 3BP2 protein expression 2-fold in primary murine macrophages (Figure 1C) without elevation of the Sh3bp2 transcript levels (Supplemental Figure 1B). These data suggest that both 3BP2 and AXIN1 proteins are likely stabilized through a posttranscriptional mechanism downstream of RANK signaling. In the previous studies, we and others showed that 3BP2 and AXIN1 are negatively regulated through tankyrase-mediated ADP ribosylation, which creates a recognition-binding site for the E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF146 (15, 20, 21). We observed that RANKL suppressed lysine 48 ubiquitylation of 3BP2 without changes in the levels of ADP ribosylation in primary murine macrophages (Figure 1D and Supplemental Figure 1C). These results suggest that the attenuated levels of 3BP2 ubiquitylation could be the result of decreased RNF146 expression, activity, or both. Consistent with these results, we found that expression levels of Rnf146 mRNA and protein were reduced in RANKL-treated macrophages (Figure 1, E and F).

Figure 1. RANKL stabilizes 3BP2 and AXIN1 protein levels through suppression of the E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF146.

Figure 1

(A) Primary murine macrophages were cultured in the presence or absence of RANKL (50 ng/ml). Whole cell lysates were probed with the indicated antibodies for Western blot analysis. (B) Primary murine macrophages were cultured in the presence or absence of RANKL (50 ng/ml) and a WNT3a-conditioned medium. Whole cell lysates were probed with the indicated antibodies for Western blot analysis. (C) Whole cell lysates from cells in A were probed with the indicated antibodies for Western blot analysis. (D) Primary murine macrophages cultured in the presence or absence of RANKL (50 ng/ml) were treated with 10 μM MG132 for 4 hours prior to collection of cell lysates. 3BP2 immune complexes were probed with an anti–K48 linkage–specific polyubiquitin or anti-3BP2 antibody. (E) qPCR analysis of Rnf146 mRNA expression in primary murine macrophages cultured in the presence or absence of RANKL (50 ng/ml). n = 3. (F) Primary murine macrophages were cultured in the presence or absence of RANKL (50 ng/ml). RNF146 immune complexes were probed with an anti-RNF146 antibody. Whole cell lysates (WCLs) were probed with an anti-GAPDH antibody for Western blot analysis. (G) Primary murine macrophages infected with an empty vector control (mock) or RNF146-expressing retroviral vector were cultured in the presence or absence of RANKL (50 ng/ml). Whole cell lysates were probed with the indicated antibodies for Western blot analysis. (H) TRAP staining of osteoclasts infected with an empty vector control (mock) or RNF146-expressing retroviral vector and cultured in the presence or absence of RANKL for 7 days. Original magnification, ×40. n = 3. P values were determined by ANOVA with Tukey-Kramer’s post hoc test (B and G) or unpaired t test (A, CF, and H). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05.

These data suggest that RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis may in part be mediated by the coordinated stabilization of 3BP2 and suppression of β-catenin, a known inhibitor of osteoclast formation (1113), through the repression of RNF146. To determine whether the stabilization of 3BP2 and AXIN1 by RANKL is achieved specifically through repression of Rnf146 transcription, we sought to rescue this effect by ectopic expression of RNF146. We infected primary murine macrophages with an RNF146-expressing retroviral vector and observed that ectopic expression of RNF146 restored the 3BP2 and AXIN1 expression levels elevated by RANKL to normal levels and impaired osteoclast differentiation (Figure 1, G and H). These findings demonstrate that RANKL stabilizes 3BP2 and AXIN1 through suppression of the E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF146, leading to enhanced osteoclastogenesis.

RANKL suppresses RNF146 promoter activity through activation of NF-κB.

To elucidate the basis of RANKL transcriptional repression of RNF146, we performed functional analysis of RNF146 promoter cloned into a luciferase reporter construct. We generated 9 constructs derived from a 1-kb RNF146 promoter fragment upstream of the putative transcriptional start site (Figure 2, A and B). We observed robust luciferase activity from P1 and P4 promoters, but not from P6 and P7 promoters, in 293T cells, demonstrating that P1 and P4 are active promoter fragments (Figure 2A and Supplemental Figure 2A). We next examined the promoter activities in response to RANKL stimulation and observed that RANKL strongly inhibited P4 luciferase activity in a murine macrophage cell line, RAW264.7 (Figure 2C). To identify the minimal inhibitory promoter elements in P4 that were responsive to RANKL treatment, we cloned a series of truncated promoter fragments, shown in Figure 2B. Promoter activity derived from all of the smaller fragments was 7 times higher than that of P4 (Figure 2D), suggesting the presence of a negative regulatory element between P4 and P13 (Figure 2, A and B). To determine the transcription factors that could potentially bind to the negative regulatory region, we analyzed the sequence of P4 that was absent from P13 using MATCH, a transcription factor–binding prediction algorithm (22), and found a conserved sequence within the RNF146 promoter that corresponded to a potential binding site for NF-κB (Figure 2, A and B, and Supplemental Figure 2, B and C). To evaluate the functional relevance of this sequence, we introduced mutations in the putative NF-κB–binding site in the P4 promoter fragment to disrupt NF-κB binding (P4 mutant), as predicted by the position weight matrix (Supplemental Figure 2C), and observed that the P4 mutant construct augmented luciferase activity to levels similar to those of promoter P13 (Figure 2E) and that neither P4 mutant nor P13 promoter activity was suppressed by RANKL (Supplemental Figure 2D). To confirm that NF-κB regulates endogenous Rnf146 transcription, we performed ChIP of the Rnf146 promoter in RAW264.7 cells and observed strong enrichment of an Rnf146-derived amplicon in NF-κB chromatin immunoprecipitates (Figure 2F). Importantly, we found that recruitment of NF-κB to the Rnf146 promoter was increased 2-fold by RANKL treatment (Figure 2F). These results are consistent with a model whereby RANKL stabilizes 3BP2 and AXIN1 via NF-κB transcriptional repression of RNF146, leading to enhanced osteoclast differentiation.

Figure 2. RANKL suppresses RNF146 promoter activity through activation of NF-κB.

Figure 2

(A and B) Boundaries of RNF146 promoter constructs cloned into the pGL3–basic luciferase reporter vector. Numbers are relative to the transcription start site of the major RefSeq (RefSeq Accession: NM_030963) transcript. Dashed line indicates a potential binding site for NF-κB between P4 and P13. (C) Luciferase activity from the indicated RNF146 promoter constructs transfected in RAW264.7 cells. Cells were cultured in the presence or absence of RANKL (100 ng/ml). n = 3. (D and E) Luciferase activity from the indicated RNF146 promoter constructs transfected in RAW264.7 cells. n = 3. (F) qPCR of chromatin immunoprecipitates from RAW264.7 cells cultured in the presence or absence of RANKL (100 ng/ml). Amplicons flank the NF-κB–binding site within the Rnf146 promoter. Fold enrichment represents the signal obtained after immunoprecipitation with the indicated antibody over the nonspecific IgG antibody. n = 3. P values were determined by ANOVA with Tukey-Kramer’s post hoc test (C, E, and F). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05.

RNF146 represses osteoclastogenesis and LPS-mediated TNF-α production in bone marrow–derived osteoclast progenitors.

To test the hypothesis that RANKL-mediated repression of RNF146 coordinates enhanced 3BP2 signaling with the attenuated β-catenin in osteoclasts, we generated Rnf146 conditional knockout mice (Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre) to examine the in vivo bone phenotype in the absence of RNF146 within the macrophage compartment (Supplemental Figure 3, A–D). We observed that excision of RNF146 in osteoclast progenitors accelerated in vitro osteoclast differentiation and enhanced bone resorptive capacity in response to macrophage CSF (M-CSF) and RANKL compared with WT cells (Figure 3, A and B). The capacity of Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre osteoclast progenitors to execute the osteoclastogenic differentiation program, as assessed by the induction of Ctsk, Calcr, and Acp5 mRNAs, was significantly enhanced compared with that of WT cells (Figure 3, C–E). In addition to the developmental effects of loss of RNF146 on osteoclastogenesis, we found that Tnfα mRNA expression in response to a TLR4 ligand, LPS, was enhanced in Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre progenitors compared with that in WT cells (Figure 3F). Moreover, LPS-mediated TNF-α production in vivo was elevated in Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre mice compared with that in WT mice (Figure 3G). These findings demonstrate that repression of RNF146 is a critical checkpoint during osteoclast maturation and LPS-induced TNF-α production in bone marrow–derived osteoclast progenitors.

Figure 3. RNF146 represses osteoclastogenesis and LPS-mediated TNF-α production in bone marrow–derived osteoclast progenitors.

Figure 3

(A and B) TRAP staining (A) or resorption pit assay (B) of osteoclasts derived from WT and Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre (KO) osteoclast progenitors cultured in the presence or absence of RANKL for 7 days. Original magnification, ×40. n = 3. (CE) qPCR analysis of Ctsk (C), Calcr (D), and Acp5 (E) mRNA expression in primary murine osteoclast progenitors derived from WT and Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre (KO) mice and cultured in the presence of RANKL for 0 to 3 days. The relative expression of each mRNA was normalized to that in WT cells at day 3. n = 3. (F) qPCR analysis of Tnfα mRNA expression in primary murine osteoclast progenitors derived from WT and Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre (KO) mice and cultured in the presence of LPS (10 ng/ml) for 0 to 24 hours. n = 3. (G) WT and Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre (KO) mice were injected i.p. with LPS, and TNF-α in the serum was measured by ELISA 4 hours later. n = 5. P values were determined by unpaired t test. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05.

Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre mice are osteopenic due to active osteoclastogenesis.

To investigate the role of RNF146 in skeletal remodeling, we analyzed the bones of Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre mice. 3D reconstruction of femora using microcomputed tomography (μCT) showed osteopenia (Figure 4A), with a reduction of trabecular bone volume (Figure 4B), trabecular bone mineral density (Figure 4C), and trabecular number (Figure 4D), and an increased trabecular separation (Figure 4E) in Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre mice compared with that in WT mice, though trabecular thickness was under normal (Figure 4F). Additionally, a reduction of cortical thickness, cortical major and minor diameter, and cortical periosteal and endosteal perimeter was observed in Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre mice (Figure 4G and Supplemental Figure 4, A–D).

Figure 4. Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre mice are osteopenic due to active osteoclastogenesis.

Figure 4

(A) μCT reconstruction of the trabecular region below the distal femur growth plate (top panels) and the cortical region of midshaft femurs (bottom panels) of 12-week-old WT and Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre (KO) mice. (BG) μCT-derived measurements of trabecular bone volume per total volume (BV/TV) (B), trabecular bone mineral density (C), trabecular number (D), trabecular separation (E), trabecular thickness (F), and cortical thickness (G) of 12-week-old WT and Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre (KO) mice. n = 6. (H) H&E staining of tibiae from 12-week-old WT and Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre (KO) mice. Scale bars: 1 mm. (IM) Histomorphometric analysis of trabecular bone volume per total volume (I), osteoclast surface per bone surface (Oc.S/BS) (J), osteoclast number per bone surface (N.Oc/BS) (K), osteoid surface per bone surface (OS/BS) (L), and osteoblast number per bone surface (N.Ob/BS) (M) of 12-week-old WT and Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre (KO) mice. n = 5–7. (NP) Dynamic histomorphometric analysis of tibial trabecular bone formation rate (BFR/BS) (N), mineral apposition rate (MAR) (O), and mineralizing surface (MS/BS) (P) of 12-week-old WT and Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre (KO) mice. n = 5–6. P values were determined by unpaired t test. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05.

Histological analysis of tibiae from Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre mice revealed low trabecular bone mass compared with that in WT mice (Figure 4, H and I), consistent with the results of μCT analysis shown in Figure 4, A and B. To determine the cause of low trabecular bone mass observed in Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre mice, we first analyzed osteoclasts in tibiae stained for tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) activity. Histomorphometric analysis showed increased osteoclast surface per bone surface and osteoclast number per bone surface in Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre mice (Figure 4, J and K), indicating enhanced osteoclastogenesis. In contrast, trichrome staining of tibiae showed that osteoid surface per bone surface (Figure 4L) and osteoblast number per bone surface (Figure 4M) were similar in WT and Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre mice. Moreover, dynamic bone histomorphometric analysis after calcein green labeling revealed that bone formation rate (Figure 4N), mineral apposition rate (Figure 4O), and mineralizing surface (Figure 4P) were similar in WT and Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre mice. These results demonstrate that Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre mice show low bone mass due to enhanced osteoclastogenesis, but not defective osteoblastogenesis.

Stabilization of 3BP2 is required for activated osteoclasts and TNF-α production in Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre osteoclast progenitors.

We next investigated the molecular mechanisms underlying osteopenia resulting from activated osteoclasts in Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre mice. Given the role of the 3BP2/SRC pathway in promoting osteoclast maturation, we first examined the expression levels of 3BP2 in Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre bone marrow–derived osteoclast progenitors and observed increased 3BP2 protein expression in these cells compared with that in WT cells, leading to activation of SRC kinase (Figure 5A). We queried whether 3BP2 is required to support the emergence of highly active osteoclasts observed in Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre mice and generated Sh3bp2 conditional knockout mice (Sh3bp2fl/fl LysM-Cre) in which 3BP2 was deleted in osteoclast progenitors (Supplemental Figure 5, A and B). We observed that deletion of Sh3bp2 in osteoclast progenitors suppressed in vitro osteoclast differentiation and bone resorptive capacity compared with WT cells with a reduction of active SRC levels (Supplemental Figure 5, C–E), consistent with our previous study (14). To confirm that deletion of Sh3bp2 could rescue the phonotype observed in Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre mice, we next generated Rnf146 and Sh3bp2 conditional double-knockout mice (Rnf146fl/fl Sh3bp2fl/fl LysM-Cre) in which both RNF146 and 3BP2 were deleted in osteoclast progenitors. As shown in Figure 5, B and C, the highly activated osteoclast phenotype observed in Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre progenitors was reversed in Rnf146fl/fl Sh3bp2fl/fl LysM-Cre cells. Consistent with this result, the activation of SRC observed in Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre progenitors was restored to near normal levels in Rnf146fl/fl Sh3bp2fl/fl LysM-Cre cells (Figure 5D). Additionally, the expression levels of Ctsk, Calcr, and Acp5 mRNAs elevated in Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre progenitors were restored to normal in Rnf146fl/fl Sh3bp2fl/fl LysM-Cre cells (Figure 5, E–G). Finally, we observed that the hypersensitive response to LPS-induced TNF-α production in Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre mice was ameliorated in Rnf146fl/fl Sh3bp2fl/fl LysM-Cre mice (Figure 5, H and I). These results indicate that stabilization of 3BP2 protein is required for osteoclast activation and hypersensitivity to LPS in Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre mice.

Figure 5. Stabilization of 3BP2 is required for activated osteoclasts and TNF-α production in Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre osteoclast progenitors.

Figure 5

(A) Whole cell lysates from primary murine osteoclast progenitors derived from WT and Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre (KO) mice were probed with the indicated antibodies for Western blot analysis. (B and C) TRAP staining (B) or resorption pit assay (C) of osteoclasts derived from WT, Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre (KO), and Rnf146fl/fl Sh3bp2fl/fl LysM-Cre (dKO) osteoclast progenitors cultured in the presence or absence of RANKL for 7 days. Original magnification, ×40. n = 3. (D) Whole cell lysates from cells in B were probed with the indicated antibodies for Western blot analysis. (EG) qPCR analysis of Ctsk (E), Calcr (F), and Acp5 (G) mRNA expression in primary murine osteoclast progenitors derived from WT, Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre (KO), and Rnf146fl/fl Sh3bp2fl/fl LysM-Cre (dKO) mice and cultured in the presence of RANKL for 0 to 3 days. The relative expression of each mRNA was normalized to that in WT cells at day 3. n = 3. (H) qPCR analysis of Tnfα mRNA expression in primary murine osteoclast progenitors derived from WT, Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre (KO), and Rnf146fl/fl Sh3bp2fl/fl LysM-Cre (dKO) mice and cultured in the presence of LPS (10 ng/ml) for 0 to 24 hours. n = 3. (I) WT, Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre (KO), and Rnf146fl/fl Sh3bp2fl/fl LysM-Cre (dKO) mice were injected i.p. with LPS, and TNF-α in the serum was measured by ELISA 4 hours later. n = 6. P values were determined by ANOVA with Tukey-Kramer’s post hoc test (BI) or unpaired t test (A). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05.

Loss of 3BP2 rescued osteopenia observed in Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre mice.

We next determined whether the severe osteopenic phenotype observed in Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre mice was dependent on 3BP2. Consistent with our previous study (14), Sh3bp2fl/fl LysM-Cre mice showed increased bone mass (Figure 6A), with an elevation of trabecular bone volume (Supplemental Figure 6A), trabecular bone mineral density (Supplemental Figure 6B), trabecular number (Supplemental Figure 6C), and trabecular thickness (Supplemental Figure 6D) compared with WT mice, though trabecular separation was near normal (Supplemental Figure 6E). Cortical thickness, cortical major diameter, and cortical periosteal perimeter, but not cortical minor diameter and cortical endosteal perimeter, were also increased in Sh3bp2fl/fl LysM-Cre mice compared with WT mice (Supplemental Figure 6, F–J). In concert with the data shown in Supplemental Figure 5, C–E, these results demonstrate that 3BP2 expression in osteoclast progenitors is required for normal osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption to maintain bone mass. We finally confirmed that osteopenia observed in Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre mice was rescued in Rnf146fl/fl Sh3bp2fl/fl LysM-Cre mice (Figure 6B). Moreover, reductions of trabecular bone volume, trabecular bone mineral density, trabecular number, cortical thickness, cortical major and minor diameter, cortical periosteal and endosteal perimeter, and increased trabecular separation detected in Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre mice were also rescued in Rnf146fl/fl Sh3bp2fl/fl LysM-Cre mice (Figure 6, C–K). These data demonstrate that low bone mass observed in Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre mice was contingent on stabilization of 3BP2 in osteoclast progenitors.

Figure 6. Loss of 3BP2 rescued osteopenia observed in Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre mice.

Figure 6

(A) μCT reconstruction of the trabecular region below the distal femur growth plate (top panel) and the cortical region of midshaft femurs (bottom panel) of 12-week-old WT and Sh3bp2fl/fl LysM-Cre mice. (B) μCT reconstruction of the trabecular region below the distal femur growth plate (top panel) and the cortical region of midshaft femurs (bottom panel) of 12-week-old WT, Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre (KO), and Rnf146fl/fl Sh3bp2fl/fl LysM-Cre (dKO) mice. (CK) μCT-derived measurements of trabecular bone volume (C), trabecular bone mineral density (D), trabecular number (E), trabecular separation (F), cortical thickness (G), cortical major diameter (H), cortical minor diameter (I), cortical periosteal perimeter (J) and cortical endosteal perimeter (K) of 12-week-old WT, Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre (KO), and Rnf146fl/fl Sh3bp2fl/fl LysM-Cre (dKO) mice. n = 6. P values were determined by ANOVA with Tukey-Kramer’s post hoc test. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05.

The Wnt/β-catenin pathway is impaired in Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre osteoclast progenitors.

We next investigated the ramification of RNF146 repression by RANKL on regulating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. We examined the expression levels of AXIN1 in Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre bone marrow–derived osteoclast progenitors and observed that AXIN1 levels were significantly increased (Figure 7A), leading to antagonization of WNT3A-induced β-catenin stabilization (Figure 7B) and diminished expression of the β-catenin target gene cyclin D1 (Figure 7C and ref. 23). Consistent with these results, Wnt3a-induced cell proliferation was reduced in Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre progenitors compared with that in WT cells (Figure 7D). We hypothesized that loss of RNF146 accelerated the osteoclast developmental program through stabilization of AXIN1 and subsequent impairment of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway and queried whether accelerated osteoclastogenesis observed in Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre osteoclast progenitors was restored by activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Inhibition of GSK-3β by LiCl reversed the enhanced osteoclastogenic phenotype observed in Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre progenitors (Figure 7E and Supplemental Figure 7A). Similarly, ectopic expression of a constitutively active β-catenin (S33Y) mutant blocked the hyperactivation of osteoclasts observed in RNF146-null progenitors (Figure 7F and Supplemental Figure 7B), indicating that active osteoclastogenesis observed in Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre progenitors is in part through AXIN1-mediated inhibition of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway.

Figure 7. The Wnt/β-catenin pathway is impaired in Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre osteoclast progenitors.

Figure 7

(A) Whole cell lysates from primary murine osteoclast progenitors derived from WT and Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre (KO) mice were probed with the indicated antibodies for Western blot analysis. (B) Whole cell lysates from cells in A cultured in the presence or absence of a WNT3a-conditioned medium were probed with the indicated antibodies for Western blot analysis. (C) qPCR analysis of cyclin D1 mRNA expression in cells in B. n = 3. (D) Growth curves of primary murine osteoclast progenitors derived from WT and Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre (KO) mice cultured in a WNT3a-conditioned medium for 3 days. n = 3. (E) TRAP staining of osteoclasts derived from WT and Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre (KO) osteoclast progenitors cultured in the presence or absence of RANKL, NaCl (10 mM), and LiCl (10 mM) for 7 days. Original magnification, ×40. n = 3. (F) TRAP staining of osteoclasts derived from WT and Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre (KO) osteoclast progenitors infected with an empty vector control (mock) or β-catenin (S33Y)–expressing retroviral vector and cultured in the presence or absence of RANKL for 7 days. Original magnification, ×40. n = 3. P values were determined by ANOVA with Tukey-Kramer’s post hoc test (B, C, E, and F) or unpaired t test (A and D). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05.

These findings conclusively demonstrate that repression of RNF146 by RANKL and subsequent stabilization of 3BP2 and AXIN1 are part of a common genetic pathway required for the osteoclast developmental program.

Discussion

RANKL integrates the 3BP2 and β-catenin signaling pathways required for osteoclastogenesis by transcriptional repression of the E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF146.

Osteoclastogenesis is a dynamic process that relies on the activation of distinct signaling pathways that couple to NFATc1, NF-κB, MAPK (24), 3BP2 (14), SRC, VAV, and SYK and is dependent on the simultaneous repression of β-catenin (1113). Our findings reveal an unrecognized function of RANKL, coordinating activation of SRC through induction of 3BP2 and repression of β-catenin together with the canonical RANK signaling pathways required for osteoclastogenesis. Specifically, we found a new role of NF-κB as a transcriptional repressor of RNF146 (2527). A reduction of RNF146 expression by NF-κB attenuates ubiquitylation and degradation of its substrates, 3BP2 and AXIN1, leading to activation of SRC kinase and suppression of β-catenin, respectively (Figure 8). We found that ectopic expression of RNF146 in primary murine macrophages was sufficient to disrupt RANKL-mediated stabilization of 3BP2 and AXIN1 and blocked osteoclast differentiation, indicating that modulation of RNF146 expression is a critical control point for the osteoclast developmental program. We have demonstrated that Rnf146 LysM-Cre mice showed severe osteopenia due to hyperactivation of osteoclasts as a consequence of stabilization of 3BP2 and impairment of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Moreover, deletion of 3BP2 or ectopic expression of active β-catenin rescued the accelerated osteoclastogenic phenotype observed in RNF146-null osteoclast progenitors. These data demonstrate that loss of RNF146-induced osteoclastogenesis is contingent on activation of the 3BP2/SRC pathway and simultaneous repression of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway.

Figure 8. Schematic model showing that RANKL integrates multiple pathways controlling osteoclastogenesis through repression of the E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF146.

Figure 8

During the process of osteoclast formation, M-CSF promotes monocyte/macrophage proliferation, while RANKL induces osteoclast differentiation (28, 29). Our observation that loss of RNF146 leads to decreased macrophage proliferation and increased osteoclastogenesis with attenuated β-catenin expression expands the concept that repression of RNF146 mediates the RANKL-triggered proliferation-to-differentiation switch during osteoclastogenesis.

The 3BP2 degradation program controlled by RNF146 is essential for postnatal skeletal remodeling and TNF-α production.

RNF146 is recruited to its substrates through its WWE domain, and its E3 ubiquitin ligase activity is triggered by binding to sites of poly(ADP-ribose) modification. To date, all known RNF146 substrates are ADP ribosylated by tankyrase. 3BP2 is a substrate of both tankyrase and RNF146 (15, 21). 3BP2 missense mutations, associated with the craniofacial dysmorphia syndrome cherubism, uncouple 3BP2 from tankyrase and block 3BP2 ADP ribosylation and subsequent ubiquitylation by RNF146 (15). A knockin mouse model expressing one of the cherubism-associated mutations in Sh3bp2 displays osteopenia due to active osteoclastogenesis, and bone marrow–derived macrophages from cherubism mice are more susceptive to LPS-induced TNF-α production (18, 30). We have shown that Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre mice phenocopy cherubism knockin mice with osteopenia and highly activated osteoclasts and that depletion of 3BP2 in Rnf146fl/fl LysM-Cre mice restores this phenotype, showing that the 3BP2 degradation program controlled by RNF146 is critical for optimal postnatal skeletal remodeling.

In addition to its role in osteoclastogenesis, we found that RNF146 is a negative regulator of LPS-induced TNF-α production. Hyperresponsive TLR signaling to commensal bacteria may be an early trigger for autoinflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel diseases, and periodontitis (3137). These studies suggest 3BP2 and RNF146 as potential human autoinflammatory disease susceptibility genes. Taken together, these data show that RNF146 acts as an inhibitory switch controlling osteoclastogenesis and cytokine production.

RNF146 is a new target for RANKL.

In a recent study, J. Luo et al. demonstrated that leucine-rich repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptor 4 (LGR4) is a new receptor for RANKL (38). They showed that the RANKL/LGR4 signaling pathway inhibits the expression and activity of NFATc1 through activation of Gαq, leading to impairment of osteoclastogenesis, while Lgr4−/− mice suffer from osteopenia due to activation of the osteoclast developmental program (38). These results indicate that RANKL provides a dichotomous signal mediated through 2 distinct receptor systems to control osteoclastogenesis. In addition to the developmental effects of RANKL on osteoclastogenesis, lymph node and lymphocyte development, and breast epithelial proliferation (16), recent studies show a link between RANKL and cancer development. The RANKL/RANK pathway mediates breast cancer driven by progestin, which is commonly used for hormone replacement therapy and contraceptives (39). Moreover, RANKL is involved in the progression of osteosarcoma caused by mutations in retinoblastoma (RB) and tumor protein p53 (TP53) tumor suppressors (40), demonstrating that blockade of RANKL could be a therapeutic target for cancer development and progression. Our observation that an interplay between RNF146 and RANKL regulates osteoclastogenesis thus suggests insights into the role of RNF146 for cancer biology though the 3BP2/SRC and Wnt/β-catenin pathways. Further studies will be necessary to investigate RNF146 in multiple lineages and physiologic states.

Methods

Generation of Rnf146 conditional knockout mice.

In the targeting vector, the first loxP site was inserted in intron 3, while the second loxP site was placed in the 3′ UTR of exon 4. Essentially, almost all of the coding region of Rnf146 was flanked by 2 loxP sites. The HSVtk-Neo cassette was flanked by 2 FRT sites. Linearized targeting vector DNA was electroporated into C57BL6/J embryonic stem (ES) cells, and G418-resistant ES clones were first screened by nested PCR and then subjected to Southern blot analysis. Targeted ES clones were used for blastocyst injection, and chimeric males were mated with WT C57BL/6J females to obtain F1 mice. The removal of the HSVtk-Neo cassette was achieved by mating the F1 heterozygous mice with FLPe deleter mice on a C57BL/6J background. Rnf146fl/fl mice were crossed with LysM-Cre mice (The Jackson Laboratory) (41).

Generation of Sh3bp2 conditional knockout mice.

Sh3bp2 exons 6 and 7 were targeted (Sh3bp2tm1a(KOMP)Wtsi). The allele was initially a knockout due to the presence of a strong splice acceptor-lacZ-Neo cassette inserted before exon 6. Heterozygous F1 mice with this allele were crossed with actin-FLPe mice (The Jackson Laboratory). FLPe deletes the splice acceptor cassette and generates an allele in which exons 6 and 7 are flanked by loxP sites. Fully verified targeted ES cells were obtained from the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute Mouse Genetics Project (Sanger MGP). The mouse strain was generated at The Centre for Phenogenomics using the ES cell clone EPD0129_3_C05 from the Knockout Mouse Project (KOMP) repository at UCD (Davis, California, USA) (project ID CSD39313). Chimeric mice were generated by diploid aggregation of ES cells, and ICR embryos and heterozygous F1 mice harboring a targeted Sh3bp2 allele were obtained by crossing chimeric males with C57BL/6 female mice. Sh3bp2fl/fl mice were crossed with LysM-Cre mice.

Genotyping of Rnf146fl/fl and Sh3bp2fl/fl mice.

Tail DNA was extracted using a Wizard SV Genomic DNA Purification System (Promega), and PCR was performed using GoTaq Green Master Mix (Promega). Floxed alleles were genotyped by PCR using the following primers: Rnf146 (forward primer, 5′-CCAGTCAGACCGATCAGGAACTGAC-3′; reverse primer, 5′-TACTGAACAGCTCTCAACTATCAACACC-3′) and Sh3bp2 (forward primer, 5′-ACAGCTCAGTGTTGGATTCCTGGCTC-3′; reverse primer, 5′-ACCCTGACTGGTCGGTGTTTCAGAAC-3′).

Cell cultures.

HEK293T cells (ATCC) and RAW264.7 cells (ATCC) were cultured in DMEM (Wisent) supplemented with 10% FBS (Wisent). Bone marrow–derived macrophages were cultured as described previously (15). All cultures were maintained in a 5% CO2 environment at 37°C.

Osteoclast differentiation assay.

Bone marrow cells were cultured in α-MEM (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 10% FBS and 2% CMG (conditioned medium supernatant containing recombinant M-CSF, ref. 42). Osteoclast progenitors were then replated and cultured with recombinant mouse RANKL (10 or 50 ng/ml) for 7 days. TRAP staining was performed using a kit from Sigma-Aldrich according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Osteoclast numbers were quantified and are shown in the figures as described previously (14). Bone resorption pit assay was performed using Corning Osteo Assay Surface Plates according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Resorption area was quantified and is shown in the figures.

μCT.

Femurs from 12-week-old male mice were scanned using μCT (SkyScan 1174, Bruker) at a resolution of 9.1 μm as described previously (14, 15). Morphometric analysis was performed on a VOI of trabecular bone 1 mm in length beginning 1 mm beneath the first instance of the formation of the mineralized cartilage bridge in the developing metaphysis and on a VOI of cortical bone 0.9 mm in length in the midshaft. 3D images were reconstructed from 0.5-mm regions within the trabecular and cortical VOIs identified above. Trabecular and cortical morphometric parameters were determined according to standard protocols (43). Trabecular bone mineral density was determined by comparing against a pair of calibration phantoms (SkyScan).

Histomorphometry.

In vivo osteoblast parameters were generated from undecalcified tibial sections embedded in methyl methacrylate and stained with Goldner’s trichrome. For dynamic histomorphometric analysis, calcein green was injected on days 0 and 7, and mice were sacrificed 3 days after the second calcein injection. In vivo osteoclast parameters were generated from decalcified tibial sections embedded in paraffin and stained for TRAP activity. Images were analyzed using BIOQUANT software (BIOQUANT Image Analysis Corp.).

In vivo LPS challenge.

LPS (Sigma-Aldrich) was injected i.p. at a concentration of 1.8 mg/kg. Blood was harvested 4 hours later by cardiac puncture, and TNF-α in the serum was measured by ELISA (eBioscience) as described previously (30).

Construction and expression of β-catenin (S33Y) and RNF146 retroviral vectors.

pMXs–β-catenin (S33Y) was a gift from Shinya Yamanaka (Department of Life Science Frontiers, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan) (44). RNF146 cDNA was purchased from Origene Technologies, and pMXs-RNF146 was constructed as described previously (14). HEK293T cells were cotransfected with an empty vector control (mock), pMXs–β-catenin (S33Y), or pMXs-RNF146 with pMCV-Ecopac (EcoPak) using a CalPhos Mammalian Transfection Kit (Clontech). The virus was collected 48 hours after transfection, and primary murine macrophages were infected and cultured in the presence of RANKL for osteoclast differentiation assay.

In vivo ubiquitin assay.

An in vivo ubiquitin assay was performed as described previously (45, 46). Briefly, cells cultured in the presence or absence of RANKL (50 ng/ml) were treated with 10 μM MG132 for 4 hours prior to collection of cell lysates. Then cells were lysed in complete cell lysis buffer (2% SDS, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0) with protease and phosphatase inhibitors, boiled for 10 minutes, sheared with a sonication device, and incubated for 30 minutes at 4°C with dilution buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100). After lysates had been cleared by centrifugation at 14,000 g for 30 minutes at 4°C, immunoprecipitation and Western blotting were performed.

Reagents and antibodies.

Unless stated otherwise, all chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Antibodies were obtained from the following sources: anti-pSRC (Y416) (catalog 2101), anti-SRC (catalog 2109), anti–K48 linkage–specific polyubiquitin (catalog 4289), anti-AXIN1 (catalog 2087), anti–β-catenin (catalog 9562), anti–GAPDH (catalog 2118) (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-RNF146 (catalog SAB1408054), anti–Flag M2 (catalog F3165) (Sigma-Aldrich), anti-actin (catalog sc-47778) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.), anti-poly(ADP-ribosylation) (anti-PAR) (catalog 4336-APC-050) (Trevigen), and anti-3BP2 (catalog H00006452-M01) (Abnova) antibodies. Halt Protease and Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail was from Thermo Fisher Scientific.

Promoter assays.

HEK293T cells or RAW264.7 cells were transiently cotransfected with the indicated RNF146 promoter constructs and phRL-CMV vector (Promega) using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) or Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen), respectively. Cells were lysed and assayed for firefly and renilla luciferase activities using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter System (Promega). Data were expressed as the ratio of firefly activity to renilla activity.

RNA extraction and quantitative real-time PCR analysis.

Total cellular RNA was extracted using an RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (QIAGEN). An ImProm-II Reverse Transcription System (Promega) was used for reverse transcription, and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) was performed on a Step One Plus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) using the TaqMan Gene Expression assays (Applied Biosystems) for Gapdh (Mn99999915_g1), Rnf146 (Mn00509629_m1), and Sh3bp2 (Mn00449397_m1). The sequences of primers were as follows: Gapdh (forward primer, 5′-TGTGTCCGTCGTGGATCTG-3′; reverse primer, 5′-GATGCCTGCTTCACCACCTT-3′), Axin1 (forward primer, 5′-CCTCTACCTCACATTCCTCGCACTT-3′; reverse primer, 5′-TCAACCGTTCCTCCAACTTTTCT-3′), Ctsk (forward primer, 5′-CTTGTGGACTGTGTGACTGAG-3′; reverse primer, 5′-CTGGAAAGATGCCAAGCTTGC-3′), Calcr (forward primer, 5′-TTGAGGTTGTGCCCAATGGAG-3′; reverse primer, 5′-GTATGAAGATAGATCCCCTCGC-3′), Acp5 (forward primer, 5′-GCCGGCCACTACCCCATCTGG-3′; reverse primer, 5′-GAGGGATCCATGAAGTTGCCGG-3′), Tnfα (forward primer, 5′-TTGACCTCAGCGCTGAGTTG-3′; reverse primer, 5′-CCTGTAGCCCACGTCGTAGC-3′), and cyclin D1 (forward primer, 5′-AGGCTACAGAAGAGTATTTATGGGAAA-3′; reverse primer, 5′-TGCGTTTGAATCAAGGGAGAT-3′). The relative expression of each mRNA normalized by the expression of Gapdh was calculated by the ΔCt method.

ChIP.

Endogenous NF-κB was immunoprecipitated from RAW264.7 cell lysates using a SimpleChiP Enzymatic Chromatin IP kit (Cell Signaling Technology, catalog 9003) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Immunoprecipitations were performed with anti–NF-κB antibody (catalog 8242, Cell Signaling Technology) or control IgG. ChIP amplicons were designed flanking the NF-κB–binding site within the Rnf146 promoter. The sequences of primers were as follows: forward primer, 5′-AAATTGGAGCATCTCGGGGA-3′; reverse primer, 5′-TATGTTTCCTTTGGCCGTGC-3′.

Western blot analysis and coimmunoprecipitation.

Cells were lysed with RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris [pH 7.5], 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP40, 0.1% SDS, 0.25% sodium deoxycholate, 1 mM EDTA) supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitors as described previously (46). Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 18,000 g for 10 minutes at 4°C. For immunoprecipitation, the products were collected on protein A or G (Life Technologies). For Western blotting, the protein was resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred to a PVDF membrane (Immobilon, Millipore). Membranes were blocked in 5% BSA or 5% nonfat dried milk in PBST (PBS + 0.1% Tween-20). The images are representative of 3 independent experiments. The relative integrated densities of each protein band was digitized by ImageJ (NIH) and are shown in the figures.

Cell growth assays.

Primary murine osteoclast progenitors were cultured in WNT3a-conditioned medium and placed into the INCUCYTE Kinetic Imaging System (Essen Bioscience) to monitor cell growth and percentage of cell confluence as described previously (47).

Statistics.

All results are shown as mean ± SEM of data from at least 3 separate experiments. Data were subjected to ANOVA with Tukey-Kramer’s post hoc test or unpaired t test with JMP 7 (SAS Institute Inc.) to determine differences. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Study approval.

All animal studies were approved by the Animal Research Council at University Health Network.

Author contributions

YM and RR designed the experiments. YM performed experiments and analyzed the results. JL, OAK, ML, AC, LZ, YS, MDG, XM, and FC performed specific experiments and analyzed the results. XM and FC contributed materials. YM and RR wrote the manuscript, with helpful comments from OAK.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental data
jci-127-90527-s001.pdf (406.6KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the Canadian Institute for Health Research (CIHR) (grant 143420). RR is supported by the Princess Margaret Cancer Center and the Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (OICR): ITV. YM is supported by the Postdoctoral Fellowship for Research Abroad contributed by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, the Japan Rheumatism Foundation, the Sumitomo Life Social Welfare Services Foundation, and the Nakayama Science Foundation.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Reference information:J Clin Invest. 2017;127(4):1303–1315.https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI90527.

Contributor Information

Yoshinori Matsumoto, Email: yossy.m0629@nifty.com.

Oliver A. Kent, Email: kent.uhn@gmail.com.

Melissa Lim, Email: melissal@uhnresearch.ca.

Adele Changoor, Email: adele.changoor@gmail.com.

Lucia Zhang, Email: lucia.zhang@mail.utoronto.ca.

Yaryna Storozhuk, Email: yaryna.storozhuk@gmail.com.

Xiaohong Mao, Email: Xiaohong.Mao@novartis.com.

Feng Cong, Email: feng.cong@novartis.com.

Robert Rottapel, Email: rottapel@uhnresearch.ca.

References

  • 1.Mueller CG, Hess E. Emerging functions of RANKL in lymphoid tissues. Front Immunol. 2012;3:261. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dougall WC, et al. RANK is essential for osteoclast and lymph node development. Genes Dev. 1999;13(18):2412–2424. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.18.2412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kong YY, et al. OPGL is a key regulator of osteoclastogenesis, lymphocyte development and lymph-node organogenesis. Nature. 1999;397(6717):315–323. doi: 10.1038/16852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kim D, et al. Regulation of peripheral lymph node genesis by the tumor necrosis factor family member TRANCE. J Exp Med. 2000;192(10):1467–1478. doi: 10.1084/jem.192.10.1467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Knoop KA, Butler BR, Kumar N, Newberry RD, Williams IR. Distinct developmental requirements for isolated lymphoid follicle formation in the small and large intestine: RANKL is essential only in the small intestine. Am J Pathol. 2011;179(4):1861–1871. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Perlot T, Penninger JM. Development and function of murine B cells lacking RANK. J Immunol. 2012;188(3):1201–1205. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1102063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wiktor-Jedrzejczak W, Bartocci A, Ferrante AW, Jr, Ahmed-Ansari A, Sell KW, Pollard JW, Stanley ER. Total absence of colony-stimulating factor 1 in the macrophage-deficient osteopetrotic (op/op) mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87(12):4828–4832. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.12.4828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yoshida H, et al. The murine mutation osteopetrosis is in the coding region of the macrophage colony stimulating factor gene. Nature. 1990;345(6274):442–444. doi: 10.1038/345442a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Boyce BF, Yoneda T, Lowe C, Soriano P, Mundy GR. Requirement of pp60c-src expression for osteoclasts to form ruffled borders and resorb bone in mice. J Clin Invest. 1992;90(4):1622–1627. doi: 10.1172/JCI116032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lowe C, Yoneda T, Boyce BF, Chen H, Mundy GR, Soriano P. Osteopetrosis in Src-deficient mice is due to an autonomous defect of osteoclasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90(10):4485–4489. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.10.4485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Albers J, et al. Canonical Wnt signaling inhibits osteoclastogenesis independent of osteoprotegerin. J Cell Biol. 2013;200(4):537–549. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201207142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Otero K, et al. TREM2 and β-catenin regulate bone homeostasis by controlling the rate of osteoclastogenesis. J Immunol. 2012;188(6):2612–2621. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1102836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wei W, et al. Biphasic and dosage-dependent regulation of osteoclastogenesis by β-catenin. Mol Cell Biol. 2011;31(23):4706–4719. doi: 10.1128/MCB.05980-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Levaot N, et al. 3BP2-deficient mice are osteoporotic with impaired osteoblast and osteoclast functions. J Clin Invest. 2011;121(8):3244–3257. doi: 10.1172/JCI45843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Levaot N, et al. Loss of Tankyrase-mediated destruction of 3BP2 is the underlying pathogenic mechanism of cherubism. Cell. 2011;147(6):1324–1339. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jones WA, Gerrie J, Pritchard J. Cherubism — familial fibrous dysplasia of the jaws. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1950;32-B(3):334–347. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.32B3.334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ueki Y, et al. Mutations in the gene encoding c-Abl-binding protein SH3BP2 cause cherubism. Nat Genet. 2001;28(2):125–126. doi: 10.1038/88832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ueki Y, et al. Increased myeloid cell responses to M-CSF and RANKL cause bone loss and inflammation in SH3BP2 “cherubism” mice. Cell. 2007;128(1):71–83. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.10.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zeng L, et al. The mouse Fused locus encodes Axin, an inhibitor of the Wnt signaling pathway that regulates embryonic axis formation. Cell. 1997;90(1):181–192. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80324-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kikuchi A. Roles of Axin in the Wnt signalling pathway. Cell Signal. 1999;11(11):777–788. doi: 10.1016/S0898-6568(99)00054-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhang Y, et al. RNF146 is a poly(ADP-ribose)-directed E3 ligase that regulates axin degradation and Wnt signalling. Nat Cell Biol. 2011;13(5):623–629. doi: 10.1038/ncb2222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kel AE, Gössling E, Reuter I, Cheremushkin E, Kel-Margoulis OV, Wingender E. MATCH: A tool for searching transcription factor binding sites in DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31(13):3576–3579. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tetsu O, McCormick F. β-Catenin regulates expression of cyclin D1 in colon carcinoma cells. Nature. 1999;398(6726):422–426. doi: 10.1038/18884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Feng X, Teitelbaum SL. Osteoclasts: new insights. Bone Res. 2013;1(1):11–26. doi: 10.4248/BR201301003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tordella L, et al. ASPP2 suppresses squamous cell carcinoma via RelA/p65-mediated repression of p63. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(44):17969–17974. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1309362110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhang W, Kone BC. NF-κB inhibits transcription of the H(+)-K(+)-ATPase α(2)-subunit gene: role of histone deacetylases. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2002;283(5):F904–F911. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00156.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Datta De D, Datta A, Bhattacharjya S, Roychoudhury S. NF-κB mediated transcriptional repression of acid modifying hormone gastrin. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e73409. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mizoguchi T, et al. Identification of cell cycle-arrested quiescent osteoclast precursors in vivo. J Cell Biol. 2009;184(4):541–554. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200806139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sankar U, Patel K, Rosol TJ, Ostrowski MC. RANKL coordinates cell cycle withdrawal and differentiation in osteoclasts through the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p27KIP1 and p21CIP1. J Bone Miner Res. 2004;19(8):1339–1348. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.040321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Prod’Homme V, et al. Cherubism allele heterozygosity amplifies microbe-induced inflammatory responses in murine macrophages. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(4):1396–1400. doi: 10.1172/JCI71081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bain CC, Mowat AM. Macrophages in intestinal homeostasis and inflammation. Immunol Rev. 2014;260(1):102–117. doi: 10.1111/imr.12192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Graves DT, Li J, Cochran DL. Inflammation and uncoupling as mechanisms of periodontal bone loss. J Dent Res. 2011;90(2):143–153. doi: 10.1177/0022034510385236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Caradonna L, Amati L, Magrone T, Pellegrino NM, Jirillo E, Caccavo D. Enteric bacteria, lipopolysaccharides and related cytokines in inflammatory bowel disease: biological and clinical significance. J Endotoxin Res. 2000;6(3):205–214. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rhee SH. Lipopolysaccharide: basic biochemistry, intracellular signaling, and physiological impacts in the gut. Intest Res. 2014;12(2):90–95. doi: 10.5217/ir.2014.12.2.90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Im E, Riegler FM, Pothoulakis C, Rhee SH. Elevated lipopolysaccharide in the colon evokes intestinal inflammation, aggravated in immune modulator-impaired mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2012;303(4):G490–G497. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00120.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cario E, Podolsky DK. Differential alteration in intestinal epithelial cell expression of toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) and TLR4 in inflammatory bowel disease. Infect Immun. 2000;68(12):7010–7017. doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.12.7010-7017.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Fort MM, et al. A synthetic TLR4 antagonist has anti-inflammatory effects in two murine models of inflammatory bowel disease. J Immunol. 2005;174(10):6416–6423. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.10.6416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Luo J, et al. LGR4 is a receptor for RANKL and negatively regulates osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption. Nat Med. 2016;22(5):539–546. doi: 10.1038/nm.4076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Schramek D, et al. Osteoclast differentiation factor RANKL controls development of progestin-driven mammary cancer. Nature. 2010;468(7320):98–102. doi: 10.1038/nature09387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chen Y, et al. RANKL blockade prevents and treats aggressive osteosarcomas. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7(317):317ra197. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aad0295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Clausen BE, Burkhardt C, Reith W, Renkawitz R, Förster I. Conditional gene targeting in macrophages and granulocytes using LysMcre mice. Transgenic Res. 1999;8(4):265–277. doi: 10.1023/A:1008942828960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Takeshita S, Kaji K, Kudo A. Identification and characterization of the new osteoclast progenitor with macrophage phenotypes being able to differentiate into mature osteoclasts. J Bone Miner Res. 2000;15(8):1477–1488. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.8.1477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Parfitt AM, et al. Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units. Report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee. J Bone Miner Res. 1987;2(6):595–610. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650020617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell. 2006;126(4):663–676. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Choo YS, Zhang Z. Detection of protein ubiquitination. J Vis Exp. 2009;(30):1293. doi: 10.3791/1293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Matsumoto Y, et al. Reciprocal stabilization of ABL and TAZ regulates osteoblastogenesis through transcription factor RUNX2. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(12):4482–4496. doi: 10.1172/JCI87802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Cullis J, et al. The RhoGEF GEF-H1 is required for oncogenic RAS signaling via KSR-1. Cancer Cell. 2014;25(2):181–195. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental data
jci-127-90527-s001.pdf (406.6KB, pdf)

Articles from The Journal of Clinical Investigation are provided here courtesy of American Society for Clinical Investigation

RESOURCES