Abstract
Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) is a pregnancy-specific hormone that regulates placental development. hCG concentrations vary widely throughout gestation and differ based on fetal sex. Abnormal hCG concentrations are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes including fetal growth restriction. We studied the association of hCG concentrations with fetal growth and birth weight. In addition, we investigated effect modification by gestational age of hCG measurement and fetal sex. Total serum hCG (median 14.4 weeks, 95 % range 10.1–26.2), estimated fetal weight (measured by ultrasound during 18–25th weeks and >25th weeks) and birth weight were measured in 7987 mother–child pairs from the Generation R cohort and used to establish fetal growth. Small for gestational age (SGA) was defined as a standardized birth weight lower than the 10th percentile of the study population. There was a non-linear association of hCG with birth weight (P = 0.009). However, only low hCG concentrations measured during the late first trimester (11th and 12th week) were associated with birth weight and SGA. Low hCG concentrations measured in the late first trimester were also associated with decreased fetal growth (P = 0.0002). This was the case for both male and female fetuses. In contrast, high hCG concentrations during the late first trimester were associated with increased fetal growth amongst female, but not male fetuses. Low hCG in the late first trimester is associated with lower birth weight due to a decrease in fetal growth. Fetal sex differences exist in the association of hCG concentrations with fetal growth.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10654-016-0201-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Keywords: hCG, Fetal growth, Birth weight, Fetal sex, Trophoblast
Introduction
Optimal intrauterine conditions are essential for proper fetal development and growth. Intrauterine conditions are highly dependent on the placental function since the placenta is the main source of fetal nourishment and the main regulator of the intrauterine environment [1, 2]. A suboptimal intrauterine environment leads to fetal adaptations that may affect fetal growth and thereby lead to lower birth weight [3, 4]. Low birth weight is an important determinant of child’s health and a major risk factor for several noncommunicable diseases later in life including coronary heart disease, stroke, hypertension and type 2 diabetes [5, 6].
Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) is a pregnancy-specific hormone that is produced by trophoblast cells from the time of embryo implantation onwards [7]. Besides promoting progesterone production by corpus luteal cells, hCG has been shown to regulate many processes that are related to fetal growth including trophoblast differentiation, uterine growth, various aspects of placentation as well as uterine angiogenesis and vasculogenesis [7, 8]. More specifically, hCG has also been shown to stimulate the production of endocrine gland-derived vascular endothelial growth factor (EG-VEGF), which is involved in the physiology of placental development [9, 10]. By acting on cytotrophoblast cells, EG-VEGF is involved in the process of trophoblast shell and arterial plugs formation, necessary for preventing maternal blood flow into the intervillous space during early pregnancy [9]. hCG may also directly influence uterine and fetal growth by acting on gonadotropin receptors present in the uterine tissue and fetal membranes [8, 11, 12].
Although clinical studies have shown that hCG is associated with adverse outcomes, this association seems to differ according to the gestational age at which hCG is measured. Low hCG concentrations in the first trimester as well as high hCG concentrations in the second trimester have both been associated with pregnancy loss and preeclampsia [13–16]. High hCG concentrations in the second trimester have also been associated with gestational hypertension, fetal growth restriction, fetal death and preterm delivery [16, 17]. Given that hCG concentrations vary throughout gestation, it is remarkable that very little is known about potential gestational time-dependent effects of hCG on adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Given the important role of hCG in many fetal growth-related processes, we examined the overall and gestational age-dependent associations of hCG with fetal growth, as well as possible fetal sex-specific differences, in a large population-based prospective cohort study.
Materials and methods
Study population
This study was embedded in the Generation R cohort, a population-based prospective study from early fetal life onwards in Rotterdam, the Netherlands [18]. The study was designed to identify early environmental and genetic causes leading to normal and abnormal growth, development and health during fetal life and childhood [18]. In total, 8879 mothers with expected delivery date between April 2002 and January 2006 were enrolled during pregnancy. Total hCG was determined in all first available serum samples and this data, together with data on birth weight, was available in 7987 mother–child pairs. Women with twin pregnancies (N = 90) or in vitro fertilization treatment (N = 38) were excluded from the analysis.
hCG measurements
Total hCG was measured in serum using a solid-phase two-site chemiluminiscent immunometric assay, calibrated against WHO 3rd IS 75/537, on an Immulite 2000 XPi system (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Deerfield, IL, USA). The assay detects serum intact hCG, hyperglycosated hCG, serum nicked hCG, serum nicked hyperglycosated hCG, serum asialo hCG, serum hCG free β-subunit and serum nicked hCG β. hCG concentrations were transformed to standard deviation scores adjusted to gestational age at blood sampling [19].
Fetal growth and birth weight
Early fetal growth was estimated by ultrasound measurement of crown-rump length (CRL) in a subset of women (N = 1526) which had a reliable and regular menstrual cycle [18, 19]. CRL values were transformed to standard deviation scores adjusted to gestational age of pregnancy determined according to the last menstrual period (LMP). CRL was measured by ultrasound in early pregnancy, in a true mid-sagittal plane with the genital tubercle and the fetal spine longitudinally in view [20]. The maximum length from cranium to the caudal rump was measured as a straight line [20].
Fetal weight was estimated by ultrasound measurements in the period of 18–25th week of pregnancy (median = 20.5 week, 95 % range 18.5–23.4 week; N = 7471) and after the 25th week of pregnancy (median = 30.3 week, 95 % range 28.3–33.0 week; N = 7641) and estimations for fetal weight were transformed to standard deviation scores adjusted to gestational age of pregnancy determined by crown-rump length and biparietal diameter, as has been described previously [20]. Information on birth weight was obtained from community midwives, obstetricians and hospital registries. Birth weight standard deviations scores, adjusted for gestational age, were constructed using the Niklasson percentile growth curves [21]. Small for gestational age at birth (SGA) was defined as a standardized birth weight lower than the 10th percentile of the study population.
Covariates
Information on maternal age, smoking status, educational level and ethnicity was obtained by questionnaires during pregnancy. Ethnicity was determined by the country of origin and was defined according to the classification of Statistics Netherlands [18]. Maternal smoking was classified as no smoking, smoking until known pregnancy and continued smoking during pregnancy. Information on fertility treatment, parity, placental weight at birth and sex of the child was obtained from community midwives, obstetricians, and hospital registries. Gestational weight gain was defined as the difference between self-reported maternal weight before pregnancy and maternal weight measured in the third trimester (a sensitivity analysis using maternal weight measured in early pregnancy and in the third trimester did not reveal more confounding potential or explained variability of the model). Free thyroxine (FT4) and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) were available in a subset of 5498 pregnant women during early pregnancy [22].
Statistical analysis
We investigated the association of hCG concentrations with CRL within a subset group of women (with regular cycles and known last menstrual period) and birth weight within the whole group by using multiple linear regression analysis with restricted cubic splines utilizing three knots. Multivariable associations were graphically depicted by plots (main manuscript) and the key β estimates with 95 % confidence intervals are shown in Supplemental Table 3. We tested for effect modification with gestational age at blood measurement and fetal sex by introducing a product interaction term of hCG and gestational age at blood sampling or fetal sex to the model. Given the fetal growth differences across gestational age and between male and female fetuses, a P value of <0.15 was considered for stratification. We subsequently stratified the analyses by quintiles of gestational age at blood sampling and in the case of a difference between these time points, further stratification was performed per one or more gestational weeks. To study the association of hCG with the risk of SGA we used multiple logistic regression models with restricted cubic splines utilizing three knots. The association of hCG concentrations with fetal growth throughout gestation was analyzed using unbalanced repeated measurement regression models for which the outcome consisted of standardized estimated fetal weight in the second and third trimester and standardized birth weight. These models take the correlation between repeated measurements of the same subject into account and allow for incomplete outcome data [23]. We used an unstructured covariance matrix with fixed effects, and added the interaction term of hCG with the time component (gestational age) in the models, and adjusted for covariates. Based on the size of effect estimate differences and biological plausibility extracted from the literature, we stratified these analyses in a similar manner as previously described analyses on birth weight. Lower statistical power in subsequent subset analyses and the need for testing three-way interactions were deemed statistically not viable. The hCG cut-off in the repeated measurement analyses was chosen based on the optimal power necessary for the biologically plausible reference group.
All model covariates were selected based on biological plausibility, change in effect estimate of interest or residual variability of the model. All analyses were adjusted for maternal age, smoking status, BMI, parity, educational level, ethnicity, fetal sex, placental weight at birth, gestational age at blood sampling and gestational weight gain of the mother. Placental weight, as a marker for trophoblast cell mass, may be an important determinant of both hCG concentrations [19] and fetal growth and from that reason was adjusted for in the models. Maternal weight gain was taken as a proxy for the potential confounding effects of hyperemesis gravidarum (HG). Gestational weight change is an important clinical marker of the HG effects [24] and the same goes for other symptoms of HG such as reflux/belching, nausea and vomiting—but addition of these factors did not change our models.
For covariates with missing data, multiple imputation according to the Markov Chain Monte Carlo method was used [25]. Five imputed data sets were created and pooled for the analysis. Maternal smoking, education, ethnicity, BMI, parity, placental weight, gestational weight gain and fetal sex were added to the model. Furthermore, we added gestational age at blood sampling, hCG level and maternal FT4 level as prediction variables only. No statistically significant differences in descriptive statistics were found between the original and imputed datasets.
Statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package of Social Sciences version 21.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc. Armonk, NY), R statistical software with RMS package version 3.2.0 and SAS software for Windows version 9.3.
Results
The final study population consisted of 7987 pregnant women (Fig. 1), descriptive statistics of which are shown in Table 1. Maternal hCG concentrations were measured at the moment of inclusion in the study (median 14.4 weeks, 95 % range 10.1–26.2 weeks). In the study population, the mean (±SD) birth weight was 3412.0 (±559.7) grams, the mean gestational age at birth was 39.8 (±1.9) weeks, the mean maternal age was 29.6 (±5.3) years, women were predominantly nulliparous (55.3 %), non-smokers (72.7 %) and of Dutch origin (46.6 %).
Table 1.
Characteristics | Value |
---|---|
hCG, median (95 % range), IU/l, | 35559.0 (6106.8–101808.5) |
Birth weight, mean (SD), g | 3412.0 (559.7) |
Gestational age at blood sampling, median (95 % range), weeks | 14.4 (10.1–26.2) |
Gestational age at birth, mean (SD), weeks | 39.8 (1.9) |
Age, mean (SD), years | 29.6 (5.3) |
BMI, median (95 % range), kg/m2 | 23.9 (18.7–36.5) |
Parity, n (%) | |
Nullipara | 4531 (55.3) |
Primipara | 2475 (30.2) |
Multipara | 1187 (14.5) |
Smoking status, n (%) | |
Non smokers | 5953 (72.7) |
Stopped smokers | 691 (8.4) |
Smokers | 1549 (18.9) |
Educational level, n (%) | |
No education or primary education | 1046 (12.8) |
Secondary education | 3844 (46.9) |
Higher education | 3303 (40.3) |
Ethnicity, n (%) | |
Dutch | 3742 (46.6) |
Moroccan | 530 (6.6) |
Turkish | 710 (8.8) |
Surinam | 686 (8.5) |
Other-European | 598 (7.5) |
Other-Non-European | 1758 (21.9) |
Fetal sex, n (%) | |
Male | 4124 (50.3) |
Female | 4069 (49.7) |
Gestational weight gain, mean (sd), kg | 10.0 (5.1) |
Placental weight at birth (g), median, (95 % range) | 620.0 (390.0–950.0) |
The association of maternal hCG with birth weight
In the whole population, there was a non-linear association of maternal hCG concentrations with birth weight (Supplemental Fig. 1, P = 0.009) and the risk of SGA (Supplemental Fig. 1, Supplemental Table 1). Considering that hCG concentrations vary throughout gestation, we investigated whether gestational age at blood sampling modifies the association of hCG concentrations with birth weight. After addition of a product interaction term to the model (hCG*gestational age at blood sampling; P = 0.10), we stratified the association of hCG concentration with birth weight by gestational age at blood sampling (Fig. 2; Supplemental Fig. 2). The association of hCG with birth weight was present in the 11th week (Fig. 2, P = 0.03; beta estimates shown in Supplemental Table 3) and 12th week of pregnancy (Fig. 2, P = 0.002; Supplemental Fig. 3), but not from the 13th week onwards (Fig. 2; Supplemental Fig. 3). The association of hCG with the risk of SGA showed a consistent trend with the results from linear regression analysis with birth weight, with a tendency of higher odds of SGA in low hCG concentrations in the 11th and 12th week (Fig. 2 and Supplemental Fig. 3). The odds of SGA in women with low hCG concentration measured in the 11th and 12th week (<5th to <15th percentile) were 1.80 to 2.21-fold higher than the reference group (Supplemental Table 2).
Subsequently, we set out to investigate if the association of hCG with birth weight occurs due to changes during early pregnancy (crown rump length) or also due to changes in the second half of pregnancy (fetal growth).
The association of maternal hCG with crown rump length
In the subset of women with regular cycles and known last menstrual period, in which CRL measurement was available, hCG concentrations during early pregnancy were negatively associated with CRL, but this analysis did not reach statistical significance (Supplemental Fig. 4; N = 1526; P for interaction fetal sex = 0.10).
The association of maternal hCG with fetal growth
Maternal hCG concentrations were associated with estimated fetal weight in the whole population, but this association was most prominent in pregnancies in which hCG was measured in the 12th week of gestation (Table 2). The association between hCG concentrations measured in the 12th week of pregnancy and estimated fetal weight is illustrated in Fig. 3. The estimated fetal weight in women with a relatively high hCG concentration (Fig. 3, 3rd tertile, depicted by the dotted line) was lower in mid pregnancy but accelerated throughout gestation, finally reaching a birth weight similar to the reference group (2nd tertile). In contrast, estimated fetal weight in women with a low hCG concentration (Fig. 3, 1st tertile, depicted by the solid line) was similar in mid-pregnancy, but was associated with lower birth weight than the reference group after a decrease of fetal growth in the second half of pregnancy.
Table 2.
Beta | ±SE | P value | 95 % Confidence interval | Number of participants per week | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
hCG in all | 0.002 | ±0.001 | 0.0017 | (0.001, 0.003) | |
hCG stratified per week of measurement | |||||
11th week | −0.001 | ±0.003 | 0.81 | (−0.007, 0.005) | 254 |
12th week | 0.007 | ±0.002 | 0.0002 | (0.003, 0.010) | 783 |
13th week | 0.000 | ±0.001 | 0.94 | (−0.003, 0.003) | 1412 |
14th week | 0.000 | ±0.002 | 0.78 | (−0.003, 0.004) | 1060 |
Table shows the effects estimates of repeated measurement model for the association of total hCG (standardized according to gestational age at measurement; SD) with fetal growth (standardized estimated fetal weight measured using ultrasound in mid pregnancy (18–25 weeks), late pregnancy (>25 weeks) and birth weight), as beta estimate with standard error. Analyses were performed after exclusion of women with IVF treatment (N = 38), twin pregnancy (N = 90) and were adjusted for maternal age, smoking, BMI, parity, education level, ethnicity, gestational weight gain, placental weight at birth and fetal sex
Sex-specific differences in the association of hCG with birth weight and fetal growth
Considering the biological differences in fetal growth and in hCG physiology between male and female fetuses, we tested for effect modification by fetal sex. After addition of a product interaction term to the model (hCG*fetal sex; P = 0.10), we stratified analyses according to fetal sex. The association of hCG concentrations (measured in week 11–12) and birth weight did not differ for fetal sex (Supplemental Fig. 5 and 6). However, in women with low hCG concentrations (<10th or <15th percentile), the risk of SGA was higher in male than in female fetal-sex (Supplemental Table 4).
The association of hCG concentrations with estimated fetal weight differed according to fetal sex (Supplemental Table 5). In women with relatively low hCG during the late first trimester (Fig. 4, 1st tertile, depicted by the solid lines), estimated fetal weight in mid-pregnancy was overall lower in male than in female fetuses. However, in female fetuses, low maternal hCG was associated with a greater deceleration of fetal growth than in male fetuses (−0.17 SD decrease in male fetus pregnancies versus −0.26 SD decrease in female fetus pregnancies; Fig. 4).
In women with high hCG concentrations during the late first trimester (Fig. 4, 3rd tertile, depicted by the dotted lines), estimated fetal weight during mid-pregnancy was overall lower in female than in male fetuses. However, in female fetuses, high maternal hCG concentrations were associated with an acceleration of fetal growth as compared to a slight deceleration in male fetus pregnancies (−0.07 SD decrease in males versus +0.26 SD increase in females; Fig. 4).
There was no effect modification by, or change in the results after adjustment for maternal FT4 and TSH concentrations (data not shown).
Discussion
Our study shows that low hCG concentrations in the late first trimester are associated with lower birth weight and an increased risk of SGA. We demonstrate that the association of low hCG concentrations in the late first trimester with lower birth weight arises due to a decrease in fetal growth during the second half of pregnancy. In contrast, high concentrations of hCG in the late first trimester were associated with growth acceleration which resulted in a normal birth weight. A low hCG concentration was associated with a decrease in fetal growth, independent of fetal sex. However, high hCG concentrations were associated with an accelerated fetal growth in female, but not in male fetuses.
Fetal growth and birth weight reflect intrauterine conditions during pregnancy. Major healthcare problems such as cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes are preordained in utero and low birth weight is one of the main determinants of those disorders [5, 6]. Previous studies that investigated hCG as a potential determinant of fetal growth restriction mostly focused on either the first or second trimester. Furthermore, most of those studies examined only the association of the β-hCG isoform and fetal growth, meaning that non-measured differences in other important active hCG-isoforms could have influenced the results [26]. A large Danish study of 9450 women in the 8th–13th week of pregnancy reported that a low free β-hCG concentration is associated with SGA [27]. A study of 8012 pregnant women by Krantz et al. reported that a low free β-hCG concentration in the 10th–13th week of pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of fetal growth restriction (FGR) [28]. Amongst 100 women, Abdel Moety et al. also reported that low concentrations of free β-hCG measured in the 11th to 14th week of gestation are associated with FGR [29]. In contrast, other studies showed that a high hCG concentration in the second trimester is associated with a decrease in fetal growth and/or FGR [16, 17]. To date, no study had investigated the association of total hCG with fetal growth or investigated the role of gestational age of hCG measurement and/or fetal sex in this association.
In the current study, low hCG concentrations were only associated with low birth weight when hCG was measured in the 11th or 12th week of gestation, suggesting that hCG has a specific role in fetal growth during the transitional period from the first to the second trimester. This period marks the start of maternal blood supply in the intervillous space and the end of the hypoxic fetal environment [30]. Oxidative stress in early gestation is a risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes including fetal growth restriction, which might be due to a lack of antioxidant enzymes in fetal tissues at that time [31]. hCG is indirectly involved in the maintenance of early pregnancy hypoxia via regulating endocrine gland-derived vascular endothelial growth factor (EG-VEGF), a factor that at least partially ensures physiologically low oxygen concentrations during early pregnancy through stimulation of the arterial plugs formation [9]. The specific association in the current study of low hCG in the late first trimester with decreased fetal growth might be due to a suboptimal development of the trophoblast shell and arterial plugs, or an earlier release of the arterial plugs via lower levels of EG-VEGF. This could potentially expose the fetus to the harmful effects of O2 free radicals. Further studies are needed to replicate our findings and investigate the association of repeatedly measured hCG concentrations with fetal growth.
Studies have shown that fetal growth and maternal hCG concentrations differ depending on fetal sex. hCG concentrations in pregnancies with a female fetal sex are higher from as early as the third post-fertilization week [32–35]. In this study, the continuous association of hCG concentrations measured at the end of the first trimester with birth weight did not differ between pregnancies with a male or female fetus. Nevertheless, low hCG concentrations were associated with a higher risk of SGA in male fetal sex. This discrepancy already suggests that there is a fetal sex-specific association of hCG with fetal growth patterns. Moreover, further analyses revealed that the association of low hCG during the late first trimester with fetal growth deceleration was stronger in female fetal sex. Furthermore, high hCG concentrations during the late first trimester were associated with growth acceleration in the female, but not male fetuses.
Male fetuses may be more susceptible to the impact of relatively low hCG concentrations during the late first trimester than female fetuses, considering the fact that mean hCG concentrations are lower in pregnancies with a male fetus [32, 33]. On the other hand, our findings show that the association of low hCG concentrations with decreased fetal growth is present in both female and male fetal sex. This suggests that low hCG concentrations during the first trimester have an impact on the fetal growth trajectory independent of fetal sex. Interestingly, the main difference between males and females in the current study was the association of high late first trimester hCG with growth acceleration during mid-pregnancy, which was only present in female fetuses. This might be due to the higher concentrations of hCG in female fetal sex, or due to fetal sex-specific differences in hCG isoforms [19]. Future studies are needed to investigate the mechanisms that underlie the differential effects of female fetal sex in the association of hCG and fetal growth in more depth. In addition, replication of fetal sex-specific differences in the association of hCG with fetal growth will be required, preferably in samples that have adequate power to test for higher order interactions.
The strengths of the current study include the availability of hCG concentrations as well as detailed fetal growth data with serial fetal weight measurements in a large population. The fact that hCG measurements were also available across a wide gestational time span, enabled us to observe a change in the association of hCG with fetal growth across gestational age. We were, however, limited by the fact that a single hCG measurement was available. As a consequence, we were not able to assess interindividual differences in the change of hCG concentrations during pregnancy. Also, the observational nature of this study does not allow for inference of causality and does not preclude the existence of residual confounding. As such, it is possible that it is the fetal size that affects maternal hCG concentration and/or that placental growth plays a confounding or mediating role. However, the latter seems less likely since the addition of placental weight to the model did not cause any meaningful changes in effect estimates.
In conclusion, we demonstrate that late first trimester hCG concentrations are associated with fetal growth and birth weight. In women with low hCG concentrations during the late first trimester, fetal growth is lower resulting in a lower birth weight. In female fetal-sex pregnancies, a high maternal hCG concentration at the end of the first trimester is associated with fetal growth acceleration. The underlying mechanism of these effects might involve a flawed protection from oxidative stress due to effects of hCG on arterial plug formation. Further research is necessary to investigate the causality of this association and the biological mechanism by which maternal hCG in the late first trimester affects fetal growth.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgments
The contribution of the endocrine laboratory technicians is highly appreciated. We gratefully acknowledge the contribution of children and parents, general practitioners, hospitals, midwives and pharmacies in Rotterdam. The Generation R study is conducted by the Erasmus Medical Center (Rotterdam) in close collaboration with the School of Law and faculty of Social Sciences of the Erasmus University Rotterdam; the Municipal Health Service Rotterdam area, Rotterdam; the Rotterdam Homecare Foundation; Rotterdam and the Stichting Trombosedienst and Artsenlaboratorium Rijnmond, Rotterdam. The general design of the Generation R study is made possible by financial support from the Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam; The Erasmus University Rotterdam; The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development; The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research; the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport; the Ministry of Youth and Families.
Funding
This work was supported by a scholarship from ERAWEB, a project funded by the European Commission (to M.B.) and by a clinical fellowship from The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw), Project 90700412 (to R.P.P.).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have nothing to disclose.
Ethics approval
The general design, all research aims and the specific measurements in the Generation R study have been approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of the Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
References
- 1.Barker DJ, Lampl M, Roseboom T, Winder N. Resource allocation in utero and health in later life. Placenta. 2012;33(Suppl 2):e30–e34. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2012.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Salafia CM, Zhang J, Charles AK, et al. Placental characteristics and birthweight. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2008;22(3):229–239. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2008.00935.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Barker DJ. The fetal origins of coronary heart disease. Eur Heart J. 1997;18(6):883–884. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a015368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Albu AR, Anca AF, Horhoianu VV, Horhoianu IA. Predictive factors for intrauterine growth restriction. J Med Life. 2014;7(2):165–171. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Eriksson JG. Early programming of later health and disease: factors acting during prenatal life might have lifelong consequences. Diabetes. 2010;59(10):2349–2350. doi: 10.2337/db10-0878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Barker DJ. Adult consequences of fetal growth restriction. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;49(2):270–283. doi: 10.1097/00003081-200606000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cole LA. Biological functions of hCG and hCG-related molecules. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010;8:102. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-8-102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cole LA. hCG, the wonder of today’s science. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012;10:24. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-10-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Brouillet S, Hoffmann P, Feige JJ, Alfaidy N. EG-VEGF: a key endocrine factor in placental development. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2012;23(10):501–508. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2012.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tsampalas M, Gridelet V, Berndt S, Foidart JM, Geenen V, Perrier d’Hauterive S. Human chorionic gonadotropin: a hormone with immunological and angiogenic properties. J Reprod Immunol. 2010;85(1):93–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2009.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pidoux G, Gerbaud P, Cocquebert M, et al. Review: human trophoblast fusion and differentiation: lessons from trisomy 21 placenta. Placenta. 2012;33(Suppl):S81–S86. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2011.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Reshef E, Lei ZM, Rao CV, Pridham DD, Chegini N, Luborsky JL. The presence of gonadotropin receptors in nonpregnant human uterus, human placenta, fetal membranes, and decidua. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1990;70(2):421–430. doi: 10.1210/jcem-70-2-421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Goetzl L, Krantz D, Simpson JL, et al. Pregnancy-associated plasma protein A, free beta-hCG, nuchal translucency, and risk of pregnancy loss. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(1):30–36. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000129969.78308.4f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Keikkala E, Vuorela P, Laivuori H, Romppanen J, Heinonen S, Stenman UH. First trimester hyperglycosylated human chorionic gonadotrophin in serum—a marker of early-onset preeclampsia. Placenta. 2013;34(11):1059–1065. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2013.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rabie NZ, Magann EF. Human chronic gonadotropin concentrations in very early pregnancy and subsequent preeclampsia. Womens Health (Lond Engl). 2014;10(5):483–485. doi: 10.2217/whe.14.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Androutsopoulos G, Gkogkos P, Decavalas G. Mid-trimester maternal serum HCG and alpha fetal protein levels: clinical significance and prediction of adverse pregnancy outcome. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2013;11(2):102–106. doi: 10.5812/ijem.5014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gonen R, Perez R, David M, Dar H, Merksamer R, Sharf M. The association between unexplained second-trimester maternal serum hCG elevation and pregnancy complications. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;80(1):83–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jaddoe VW, van Duijn CM, Franco OH, et al. The Generation R Study: design and cohort update 2012. Eur J Epidemiol. 2012;27(9):739–756. doi: 10.1007/s10654-012-9735-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Korevaar TI, Steegers EA, de Rijke YB, et al. Reference ranges and determinants of total hCG levels during pregnancy: the Generation R Study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2015;30(9):1057–1066. doi: 10.1007/s10654-015-0039-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Verburg BO, Steegers EA, De Ridder M, et al. New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy and assessment of fetal growth: longitudinal data from a population-based cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31(4):388–396. doi: 10.1002/uog.5225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Niklasson A, Albertsson-Wikland K. Continuous growth reference from 24th week of gestation to 24 months by gender. BMC Pediatr. 2008;8:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-8-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Medici M, de Rijke YB, Peeters RP, et al. Maternal early pregnancy and newborn thyroid hormone parameters: the Generation R study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(2):646–652. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-2398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Goldstein H. Multilevel statistical models. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Niemeijer MN, Grooten IJ, Vos N, et al. Diagnostic markers for hyperemesis gravidarum: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(2):1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sterne JA, White IR, Carlin JB, et al. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ. 2009;338:b2393. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Thomas CM, Reijnders FJ, Segers MF, Doesburg WH, Rolland R. Human choriogonadotropin (hCG): comparisons between determinations of intact hCG, free hCG beta-subunit, and “total” hCG + beta in serum during the first half of high-risk pregnancy. Clin Chem. 1990;36(4):651–655. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kirkegaard I, Henriksen TB, Uldbjerg N. Early fetal growth, PAPP-A and free beta-hCG in relation to risk of delivering a small-for-gestational age infant. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37(3):341–347. doi: 10.1002/uog.8808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Krantz D, Goetzl L, Simpson JL, et al. Association of extreme first-trimester free human chorionic gonadotropin-beta, pregnancy-associated plasma protein A, and nuchal translucency with intrauterine growth restriction and other adverse pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(4):1452–1458. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.05.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Abdel Moety GA, Almohamady M, Sherif NA, et al. Could first-trimester assessment of placental functions predict preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction? A prospective cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(3):1–5. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.1002763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Khong TY. Placental vascular development and neonatal outcome. Semin Neonatol. 2004;9(4):255–263. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2003.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Burton GJ. Oxygen, the Janus gas; its effects on human placental development and function. J Anat. 2009;215(1):27–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.00978.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gol M, Altunyurt S, Cimrin D, Guclu S, Bagci M, Demir N. Different maternal serum hCG levels in pregnant women with female and male fetuses: does fetal hypophyseal–adrenal–gonadal axis play a role? J Perinat Med. 2004;32(4):342–345. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2004.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yaron Y, Lehavi O, Orr-Urtreger A, et al. Maternal serum HCG is higher in the presence of a female fetus as early as week 3 post-fertilization. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(2):485–489. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.2.485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Schwarzler P, Bland JM, Holden D, Campbell S, Ville Y. Sex-specific antenatal reference growth charts for uncomplicated singleton pregnancies at 15–40 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23(1):23–29. doi: 10.1002/uog.966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lampl M, Gotsch F, Kusanovic JP, et al. Sex differences in fetal growth responses to maternal height and weight. Am J Hum Biol. 2010;22(4):431–443. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.21014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.