Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2017 Mar 30;5(13):e00087-17. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00087-17

Complete Genome Sequence of Staphylococcus aureus Strain Wood 46

Manasi Balachandran 1, Matthew C Riley 1, David A Bemis 1, Stephen A Kania 1,
PMCID: PMC5374237  PMID: 28360163

ABSTRACT

Here, we report the first complete genome sequence of the Staphylococcus aureus strain Wood 46. Wood 46 has played an important role in understanding the virulence and pathogenesis of S. aureus infections. This report will assist efforts in vaccine development against methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infections.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Staphylococcus aureus is a Gram-positive opportunistic pathogen that infects both humans and animals. It causes skin and soft tissue infections, and is also associated with septic arthritis, pneumonia, post-surgical and implant infections, osteomyelitis, septicemia, and toxic shock syndrome (1, 2). Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is an important concern in hospitals (HA-MRSA), communities (CA-MRSA), and among livestock (LA-MRSA) (2, 3). New vaccine discovery efforts rely on understanding the role of surface and/or secreted proteins in pathogenesis and infection (4, 5). The S. aureus Wood 46 strain was reported to be protein A deficient and assumed to be spa negative (6). It has also been shown to have reduced virulence in animal models of S. aureus infection (715). To date, the reason for reduced virulence and protein A expression in the Wood 46 strain remains unknown. The whole-genome sequence of this strain could provide insight into the genes, promoters, and regulatory regions involved in pathogenesis and virulence. This in turn could help researchers understand the role of specific virulence factors during infection and identify novel vaccine targets and/or develop novel strategies to combat MRSA infections.

The S. aureus Wood 46 strain was sourced from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC 10832). DNA was sequenced using Illumina MiSeq (Illumina, Inc., USA). De novo assemblies were individually produced and merged using Geneious (version 9.1.6) and CLC Genomics Workbench (version 9.0). Automated annotation was performed using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (http://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/annotation_prok).

A total of 3,985,114 high-quality reads resulted in >180-fold overall coverage. The genome is 2,824,597 bp with a 32.8% G+C content. The number of predicted coding sequences (CDS) and genes (RNAs) were 2,806 and 73, respectively. The Wood 46 genome shared 98% to 99% identity with other published S. aureus genomes. The bacterium is susceptible to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefoxitin, cephalothin, chloramphenicol, clindamycin, erythromycin, gentamicin, marbofloxacin, oxacillin, tetracycline, and trimethroprim/sulfa, and resistant to ampicillin and cefpodoxime (16).

Accession number(s).

The whole-genome shotgun project of the S. aureus strain Wood 46 has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number MTFQ00000000. The version described in this paper is MTFQ00000000.1.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to thank the University of Tennessee, Center of Excellence in Livestock Diseases and Human Health for funding this project.

The funder had no role in the study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Footnotes

Citation Balachandran M, Riley MC, Bemis DA, Kania SA. 2017. Complete genome sequence of Staphylococcus aureus strain Wood 46. Genome Announc 5:e00087-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00087-17.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Plata K, Rosato AE, Wegrzyn G. 2009. Staphylococcus aureus as an infectious agent: overview of biochemistry and molecular genetics of its pathogenicity. Acta Biochim Pol 56:597–612. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kim HK, Missiakas D, Schneewind O.. 2014. Mouse models for infectious diseases caused by Staphylococcus aureus. J Immunol Methods 410:88–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2014.04.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Grema HA, Geidam YA, Gadzama GB, Ameh JA, Suleiman A. 2015. Methicillin resistant Staphyloccusaureus (MRSA): a review. Adv Anim Vet Sci 3:79–98. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Daum RS, Spellberg B. 2012. Progress toward a Staphylococcus aureus vaccine. Clin Infect Dis 54:560–567. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Harro JM, Peters BM, O’May GA, Archer N, Kerns P, Prabhakara R, Shirtliff ME. 2010. Vaccine development in Staphylococcus aureus: taking the biofilm phenotype into consideration. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 59:306–323. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2010.00708.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Duggleby CJ, Jones SA. 1983. Cloning and expression of the Staphylococcus aureus protein A gene in Escheirchia Coli. Nucleic Acids Res 11:3065–3076. doi: 10.1093/nar/11.10.3065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Abbas-Ali B, Coleman G. 1977. Nutritional shifts and their effect on the secretion of extracellular proteins by Staphylococcus aureus (Wood 46). Biochem Soc Trans 5:420–422. doi: 10.1042/bst0050420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Abbas-Ali B, Coleman G. 1977. The characteristics of extracellular protein secretion by Staphylococcus aureus (Wood 46) and their relationship to the regulation of α-toxin formation. J Gen Microbiol 99:277–282. doi: 10.1099/00221287-99-2-277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Amend A, Chhatwal GS, Schaeg W, Blobel H. 1984. Characterization of immunoglobulin G binding to Staphylococcus aureus strain Wood 46. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A 258:472–479. doi: 10.1016/S0176-6724(84)80024-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Coleman G. 1981. Pleiotropic compensation in the regulation of extracellular protein formation by a low α-toxin-producing variant of Staphylococcus aureus (Wood 46). J Gen Microbiol 122:11–15. doi: 10.1099/00221287-122-1-11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Forsgren A. 1970. Significance of protein A production by staphylococci. Infect Immun 2:672–673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Coleman G. 1985. A comparison of the patterns of extracellular proteins produced by the high α-toxin-secreting organism Staphylococcus aureus (Wood 46) during aerobic and anaerobic growth. J Gen Microbiol 131:405–408. doi: 10.1099/00221287-131-2-405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Coleman G, Abbas-Ali B.. 1977. Comparison of the patterns of increased in alpha-toxin and total extracellular protein by Staphylococcus aureus (Wood 46) grown in media supporting widely differing growth characteristics. Infect Immun 17:278–281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Medhurst FA, Hill MJ, Glynn AA. 1969. The effect of antilymphocyte serum on subcutaneous staphylococcal infections in normal, immune and complement-deficient mice. J Med Microbiol 2:147–159. doi: 10.1099/00222615-2-2-147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Salgado MM, Pignatari ACC, Bellinati-Pires R. 2004. Phagocytosis and killing of epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by human neutrophils and monocytes. Braz J Infect Dis 8:80–89. doi: 10.1590/S1413-86702004000100005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.CLSI. 2016. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 26th ed, CLSI supplement M100S, vol 36 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES