Skip to main content
PMC home page
Biology Open logoLink to Biology Open
. 2017 Feb 9;6(3):317–325. doi: 10.1242/bio.023887

Constitutively active Notch1 converts cranial neural crest-derived frontonasal mesenchyme to perivascular cells in vivo

Sophie R Miller 1,*, Surangi N Perera 1, Clare V H Baker 1,‡
PMCID: PMC5374403  PMID: 28183698

ABSTRACT

Perivascular/mural cells originate from either the mesoderm or the cranial neural crest. Regardless of their origin, Notch signalling is necessary for their formation. Furthermore, in both chicken and mouse, constitutive Notch1 activation (via expression of the Notch1 intracellular domain) is sufficient in vivo to convert trunk mesoderm-derived somite cells to perivascular cells, at the expense of skeletal muscle. In experiments originally designed to investigate the effect of premature Notch1 activation on the development of neural crest-derived olfactory ensheathing glial cells (OECs), we used in ovo electroporation to insert a tetracycline-inducible NotchΔE construct (encoding a constitutively active mutant of mouse Notch1) into the genome of chicken cranial neural crest cell precursors, and activated NotchΔE expression by doxycycline injection at embryonic day 4. NotchΔE-targeted cells formed perivascular cells within the frontonasal mesenchyme, and expressed a perivascular marker on the olfactory nerve. Hence, constitutively activating Notch1 is sufficient in vivo to drive not only somite cells, but also neural crest-derived frontonasal mesenchyme and perhaps developing OECs, to a perivascular cell fate. These results also highlight the plasticity of neural crest-derived mesenchyme and glia.

KEY WORDS: Notch, Pericyte, Neural crest, Frontonasal mesenchyme, Olfactory ensheathing cells, Chick embryo

Summary: Sustained Notch1 activation is sufficient to drive cranial neural crest-derived frontonasal mesenchyme to adopt a perivascular (mural) cell fate in developing chick embryos.

Dedication

This paper is dedicated to the memory of Dr Sophie R. Miller, who passed away in December 2016.

INTRODUCTION

Perivascular (mural) cells – pericytes and vascular smooth muscle cells – form the periendothelial (outer) wall of blood vessels: mature pericytes are embedded within the basement membrane of the endothelial cells in microvessels (capillaries, terminal arterioles, postcapillary venules), while vascular smooth muscle cells are found in multiple layers around larger vessels (reviewed by Armulik et al., 2011; Majesky et al., 2011). Perivascular cells in the trunk, and many in the head, originate from mesoderm, but quail-chick chimera experiments revealed that the cranial neural crest (including the cardiac neural crest, a subset of the cranial neural crest that arises from the caudal hindbrain) provides perivascular cells to blood vessels in the face, pharyngeal arches and forebrain, including those of the retina (Le Lièvre and Le Douarin, 1975; Bergwerff et al., 1998; Etchevers et al., 2001; Korn et al., 2002). This was later supported via genetic lineage-tracing studies in mice (Jiang et al., 2000; Gage et al., 2005; Trost et al., 2013) and most recently zebrafish (Wang et al., 2014; Ando et al., 2016).

Multiple studies over the past decade, both in vitro and in vivo, have shown that Notch signalling is necessary for the formation of perivascular cells originating from both the mesoderm and the neural crest (e.g. Doi et al., 2006; Noseda et al., 2006; High et al., 2007, 2008; Liu et al., 2009, 2010; Chang et al., 2012; Manderfield et al., 2012, 2015; Wang et al., 2014; for reviews, see Gridley, 2007, 2010; Phng and Gerhardt, 2009; Boucher et al., 2012). Constitutive activation of the Notch pathway, via expression of the Notch1 intracellular domain (NICD), was sufficient to up-regulate smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (Myh11) and other smooth muscle marker genes in the C3H10T1/2 (mouse embryonic fibroblast) cell line (Doi et al., 2006). Physiological Notch activation, via co-culture with L cells stably expressing the Notch ligand Jagged1 (though not Delta-like 4), was also sufficient to up-regulate Myh11 in this fibroblast cell line (Doi et al., 2006). In contrast, NICD transfection did not up-regulate Myh11 in non-mesenchymal cell lines (mouse mammary gland epithelial cells, human umbilical vein endothelial cells, or human epidermal keratinocytes) (Doi et al., 2006). In vivo, NICD is sufficient to convert trunk mesoderm-derived somite cells to perivascular cells, at the expense of a muscle cell fate (Ben-Yair and Kalcheim, 2008; Mayeuf-Louchart et al., 2014). This was first demonstrated in chicken, by electroporating the lateral dermomyotome with NICD (Ben-Yair and Kalcheim, 2008), and more recently in mouse, by replacing one allele of the somite-expressed gene Pax3 with NICD (Mayeuf-Louchart et al., 2014).

Here, we show that constitutively active Notch1 is also sufficient in vivo to drive a perivascular cell fate in cranial neural crest-derived frontonasal mesenchyme, and perhaps also in developing olfactory ensheathing glial cells (OECs). We originally aimed to test the effect of prematurely activating Notch1 on the development of OECs, which are derived from the cranial neural crest cells that colonise the frontonasal mass before the olfactory placode forms (Barraud et al., 2010). OECs are first detected on the chicken olfactory nerve at embryonic day (E)3.5, via immunoreactivity for the early glial marker myelin protein zero (Mpz, P0) (Drapkin and Silverman, 1999). Two days later, at E5.5, Notch1 is up-regulated in developing OECs, and by E6.5, almost all developing OECs express Sox2 (Miller et al., 2016), which is a direct Notch/Rbpj target (Wakamatsu et al., 2004; Ehm et al., 2010; Li et al., 2012). In the development of Schwann cells, the glia of all other peripheral nerves, Notch signalling promotes the transition from Schwann cell precursors (which express Mpz) to immature Schwann cells (Woodhoo et al., 2009). To test the hypothesis that a similar Notch-mediated transition is important for OEC development, we aimed to activate Notch1 prematurely in developing chicken OECs, for which temporal control of the onset of Notch1 signalling would be required. Sato et al. (2008) previously used in ovo electroporation to insert into the genome of presomitic mesoderm cells both a construct that constitutively expresses the reverse (‘Tet-on’) tetracycline transactivator protein variant rtTA2SM2 (Urlinger et al., 2000), and a tetracycline-inducible NotchΔE construct, in which a single tetracycline-response element controls the bidirectional transcription of NotchΔE (encoding a constitutively active extracellular deletion mutant of mouse Notch1; Kopan et al., 1996) and EGFP, whose expression was activated at somite stages by doxycycline injection. This resulted in the conversion of somite cells either to perivascular cells (also shown by electroporating a construct encoding NICD directly into the lateral dermomyotome; Ben-Yair and Kalcheim, 2008) or endothelial cells (Sato et al., 2008). Here, we used the conditional expression approach of Sato et al. (2008) to insert their tetracycline-inducible NotchΔE/EGFP construct into the genome of premigratory cranial neural crest cell precursors, and activate NotchΔE/EGFP expression from E4 (by doxycycline injection), 1.5 days before Notch1 is normally up-regulated in developing OECs (Miller et al., 2016). To our surprise, we saw a striking phenotype in the neural crest-derived frontonasal mesenchyme (most of which would normally form skeletal or connective tissue, as well as perivascular cells), namely the formation by NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells of ectopic perivascular cells. NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells on the olfactory nerve also upregulated a perivascular marker. Hence, constitutive activation of Notch1 is sufficient in vivo to convert not only trunk mesoderm-derived somite cells (Ben-Yair and Kalcheim, 2008; Sato et al., 2008; Mayeuf-Louchart et al., 2014), but also cranial neural crest-derived frontonasal mesenchyme (and perhaps developing olfactory glia) to perivascular cells. These results suggest that during normal development, vascular endothelial cells expressing Notch ligands may recruit adjacent neural crest-derived frontonasal mesenchyme cells (and perhaps also developing olfactory glia) to form perivascular cells, via the sustained activation of Notch signalling. Furthermore, given that Notch signalling was not activated in targeted cranial neural crest-derived cells until after doxycycline was injected at E4, several days after the end of cranial neural crest migration, our data also speak to the plasticity of cranial neural crest-derived frontonasal mesenchyme and developing olfactory ensheathing glia.

RESULTS

We used the Tol2 transposase/‘Tet-on’ in ovo electroporation system (Sato et al., 2007; Watanabe et al., 2007), which inserts tetracycline-dependent constructs into the genome of targeted cells, to drive constitutively active Notch1 expression in cranial neural crest-derived cells from embryonic day (E)4 [Hamburger–Hamilton (HH) stage 24; Hamburger and Hamilton, 1951]. Our original intention was to investigate the effect of premature Notch1 activation on the development of olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs, the glial cells of the olfactory nerve), which up-regulate Notch1 from E5.5 (HH stage 24) (Miller et al., 2016). We therefore aimed to target the cranial neural crest precursors of OECs, which colonise the frontonasal mass before the olfactory placode forms (Barraud et al., 2010), with the Tol2-integratable, tetracycline-dependent construct pT2K-NotchΔE-BI-EGFP (Sato et al., 2008). In this construct, a single tetracycline-response element controls the bidirectional transcription of NotchΔE (encoding a constitutively active extracellular deletion mutant of mouse Notch1; Kopan et al., 1996) and EGFP (thus, EGFP labels cells successfully targeted with NotchΔE; Sato et al., 2008).

We electroporated prospective cranial ectoderm in ovo at HH stages 6-8 (25-28 h of incubation) with pT2K-NotchΔE-BI-EGFP (hereafter NotchΔE/EGFP) or the Tol2-integratable control construct pT2K-CAGGS-EGFP, encoding EGFP only (Sato et al., 2007). Each of these constructs was co-electroporated with the Tol2-integratable construct pT2K-CAGGS-rtTA2SM2 (Sato et al., 2007), encoding the reverse (‘Tet-on’) tetracycline transactivator protein rtTA2 under the control of the synthetic CAGGS promoter (Niwa et al., 1991) (thus providing a continuous supply of rtTA2 in targeted cells), plus the pCAGGS-T2TP construct, encoding Tol2 transposase (Sato et al., 2007) (to insert the rtTA2 and NotchΔE/EGFP or control EGFP constructs into the genome of targeted cells). Doxycycline was injected into the yolk under the embryo at E4 (HH stage 24) to initiate NotchΔE/EGFP expression (the control EGFP is constitutively expressed). Embryos were collected 1-4 days later (E5-E8; HH stages 27-34) for sectioning, followed by in situ hybridisation plus immunohistochemistry on sections.

Constitutive Notch activation from E4 converts frontonasal mesenchyme cells to perivascular cells

At E6 (HH stage 29; two days after doxycycline injection) in control EGFP-targeted embryos (n=2), EGFP-positive cells are distributed throughout the frontonasal mesenchyme and along peripheral nerves (Fig. 1A-B1), with only a few EGFP-positive cells associated with Lmo2-positive vascular endothelium (Nagai and Sheng, 2008) (Fig. 1C-D2). In contrast, in NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted embryos at E6-7 (HH stages 29-31; n=8), most EGFP-positive cells are aggregated in rings in the mesenchyme (Fig. 1E-F1), encircling Lmo2-positive vascular endothelium (Fig. 1G-H2). The same ‘ring-like’ distribution of EGFP-positive cells was also seen in NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted embryos at E5 (HH stage 27; n=3) (not shown). Notch pathway activation in NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells at E6 was confirmed by co-immunostaining for EGFP and the cleaved Notch1 intracellular domain (n=2; Fig. 1I-J1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Open in a new tab

Constitutive Notch activation from E4 causes frontonasal mesenchyme cells to associate with vascular endothelial cells. Parasagittal sections of the olfactory region from chicken embryos in which the cranial ectoderm had been targeted in ovo at E1 with EGFP alone (control) or NotchΔE/EGFP, using the Tol2 transposase/‘Tet-on’ electroporation system (Sato et al., 2007; Watanabe et al., 2007). Eggs were injected with doxycycline at E4. (A-B1) A control EGFP-targeted embryo at E6. Immunostaining for EGFP and Tubb3 reveals EGFP-targeted cells throughout the mesenchyme and along the olfactory nerve, as well as in the forebrain, surface ectoderm and olfactory epithelium. (C-D2) In the same embryo at E6, EGFP-targeted cells are uniformly distributed in the frontonasal mesenchyme; only a few are associated with Lmo2-positive vascular endothelial cells (arrowheads in D-D2 highlight examples). (E-F1) A NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted embryo at E6. NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells aggregate in rings in the frontonasal mesenchyme (arrowheads in F,F1) and at the edges of the olfactory nerve. (G-H2) In the same embryo at E6, NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells encircle Lmo2-positive vascular endothelial cells. (I) The same NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted embryo at E6 shown in E-F1. Immunostaining for EGFP and Tubb3 shows rings of NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells in the frontonasal mesenchyme and along the edges of olfactory nerve. (J,J1) Higher-power view of the boxed region in I. Immunostaining for the cleaved Notch1 intracellular domain reveals co-localisation with NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells (arrowheads highlight examples, both in the mesenchyme and at the edges of the olfactory nerve). bv, blood vessel; EGFP, enhanced GFP; fb, forebrain; NICD, cleaved Notch1 intracellular domain; oe, olfactory epithelium; on, olfactory nerve. Scale bars: 100 µm.

Since cranial neural crest cells normally give rise to perivascular cells in the blood vessels of the face and forebrain (Etchevers et al., 2001), we wished to use molecular markers to test whether the NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells encircling Lmo2-positive vascular endothelium in the frontonasal mesenchyme were indeed adopting a perivascular cell fate. There are no exclusive molecular markers for perivascular cells; furthermore, the expression levels of the various markers used can vary, depending on, for example, the developmental state of the cells (reviewed by Armulik et al., 2011). Nevertheless, one commonly used perivascular cell marker is platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta (Pdgfrb) (reviewed by Armulik et al., 2011). After doxycycline injection at E4, control EGFP-targeted embryos at E6 show almost no co-localisation between EGFP and Pdgfrb (n=3), barring a few cells associated with the vasculature, as expected (Fig. 2A-B2). In contrast, most NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells in the frontonasal mesenchyme express Pdgfrb at E6-7 (n=5) (Fig. 2C-D2). Perivascular cells also express vascular endothelial growth factor A (Vegfa) (Darland et al., 2003; Parenti et al., 2004; Kale et al., 2005). After initiating constitutive Notch activity by injecting doxycycline at E4, we detected Vegfa expression in NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells at E6-E7 (n=2; Fig. 2G-H2). Furthermore, immunoreactivity for the smooth muscle/myofibroblast marker alpha-smooth muscle actin (Acta2; reviewed by Armulik et al., 2011) was detected in some NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells associated with larger blood vessels at E5-E8 (n=2; Fig. 2I-J2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Open in a new tab

Constitutive Notch activation from E4 converts frontonasal mesenchyme cells to perivascular cells. Parasagittal sections of the frontonasal region from chicken embryos in which the cranial ectoderm had been targeted in ovo at E1 with EGFP alone (control) or NotchΔE/EGFP, using the Tol2 transposase/‘Tet-on’ electroporation system. Eggs were injected with doxycycline at E4. (A) A control EGFP-targeted embryo at E6. In situ hybridisation for Pdgfrb reveals perivascular cells in rings in the frontonasal mesenchyme and at the edge of the forebrain. (B) Higher-power view of boxed region in A, showing Pdgfrb-positive perivascular cells associated with a blood vessel near the forebrain. (B1,B2) Same section as B immunostained for EGFP, with Pdgfrb shown as a false-colour overlay in B2, reveals a fairly uniform distribution of EGFP-targeted cells in the mesenchyme and almost no co-localisation with Pdgfrb, apart from a few cells (arrowheads). (C-D2) A NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted embryo at E6. NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells are found in rings around the developing blood vessels and express Pdgfrb (arrowheads highlight examples), showing they are perivascular cells. (E-F2) A NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted embryo at E7. Blood vessels in the frontonasal mesenchyme (arrows indicate blood cells) are surrounded by NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted, Pdgfrb­-positive perivascular cells (arrowheads). (G) In the same NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted embryo at E7, Vegfa is expressed in developing vasculature in the frontonasal mass. (H-H2) Higher-power view of the boxed region in G, revealing Vegfa-positive NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells (arrowheads). (I-J2) A NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted embryo at E5, with NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells in rings in the frontonasal mesenchyme. Immunostaining for alpha-smooth muscle actin (Acta2) reveals a few Acta2-positive NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells (arrowheads) associated with a large blood vessel near the olfactory nerve. bv, blood vessel; EGFP, enhanced GFP; fb, forebrain; on, olfactory nerve. Scale bars: 100 µm.

Overall, these data suggest that constitutive Notch activation from E4 in cranial neural crest-derived frontonasal mesenchyme cells is sufficient to convert them to perivascular cells, identified by their location (i.e. encircling vascular endothelial cells in developing blood vessels) in combination with the expression of characteristic perivascular cell markers.

Constitutive Notch activation from E4 may convert developing olfactory ensheathing cells into perivascular cells

In control EGFP-targeted embryos at E6 (two days after doxycycline injection), EGFP-positive developing OECs (which are neural crest-derived; Barraud et al., 2010) are distributed throughout the olfactory nerve, among the axons (Fig. 3A-B1). In contrast, in NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted embryos at E6 (n=4), most NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells on the olfactory nerve seem to be excluded from the nerve's interior, instead aggregating at the edges of the nerve in ‘processes’ extending away from it (Fig. 3C-D1). At least some NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells on the olfactory nerve at E6-7 express the perivascular cell marker Pdgfrb (n=2; Fig. 3E-E2), suggesting that, like NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells in the frontonasal mesenchyme, they may have been converted to perivascular cells. Several of the NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells on the olfactory nerve express the OEC marker Sox10 (Barraud et al., 2010) (Fig. 3E-E2), confirming that at least some developing OECs were targeted. Indeed, a few of the NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells co-express Sox10 and Pdgfrb (yellow arrowheads, Fig. 3E-E2), suggesting they may have been caught in the process of changing fate. Some of the NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells on the olfactory nerve are Pdgfrb-positive but Sox10-negative (black/white arrowheads, Fig. 3E-E2): these may have originated from NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted developing OECs that have already down-regulated Sox10 expression, or NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted frontonasal mesenchyme cells that have colonised the nerve. The endogenous olfactory nerve microvasculature is starting to form at this time; in situ hybridisation for Pdgfrb and the vascular endothelial cell marker Lmo2 on sections of both NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted and wild-type embryos at E6.5-7 (n=3) reveals some untargeted Pdgfrb-positive cells (red arrowheads, Fig. 3E-E2) and a few Lmo2-positive cells (Fig. 3F-F2) within the olfactory nerve.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Open in a new tab

Constitutive Notch activation from E4 converts developing olfactory ensheathing cells into perivascular cells. Parasagittal sections of the olfactory region from chicken embryos in which the cranial ectoderm had been targeted in ovo at E1 with EGFP alone (control) or NotchΔE/EGFP, using the Tol2 transposase/‘Tet-on’ electroporation system. Eggs were injected with doxycycline at E4. Dotted lines demarcate the olfactory nerve. (A-B1) A control EGFP-targeted embryo at E6, in which the olfactory placode was not targeted. EGFP-targeted neural crest-derived cells are found throughout the frontonasal mesenchyme and associated with Tubb3-positive olfactory axons, presumably developing OECs. (C-D1) A NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted embryo at E6. NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells associated with the olfactory nerve are aggregated at the edges of the nerve, rather than being found throughout the nerve, and form processes extending away from it (arrowhead in D,D1). (E-E2) In a NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted embryo at E7, in situ hybridisation for the perivascular marker Pdgfrb (shown as a false-colour overlay in E1,E2), combined with immunostaining for the OEC marker Sox10, shows that some NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells are developing OECs; a few of these co-express Pdgfrb (yellow arrowheads), suggesting they may be undergoing fate conversion. Some NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells express Pdgfrb but not Sox10 (black/white arrowheads). Some untargeted cells express Pdgfrb (red arrowheads). (F-F2) In a nearby section from the same NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted embryo at E7, in situ hybridisation for Lmo2 reveals a few weakly Lmo2-positive vascular endothelial cells on the olfactory nerve (arrowheads). bv, blood vessel; EGFP, enhanced GFP; fb, forebrain; oe, olfactory epithelium; on, olfactory nerve; pn, peripheral nerve. Scale bars: 100 μm.

Vasculature containing NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted perivascular cells seems to attract peripheral axons and glia

In half of the NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted embryos at E5-8 (n=6 out of 12), olfactory and other peripheral axons and their accompanying OECs/Schwann cells seemed to project towards vasculature containing NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells, with some of the glial cells (identified by Sox10 expression; Barraud et al., 2010; Jacob, 2015) even found isolated from axons, in association with such cells. Fig. 4A-A3 shows an example at E5, in which the olfactory nerve is in contact with such a blood vessel, at which point olfactory axons seem to project in the wrong direction, away from the forebrain. Fig. 4B-B3 shows an example at E6, in which the olfactory nerve is in close contact with vasculature containing NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells, towards which untargeted Sox10-positive OECs seem to have migrated, leaving the olfactory nerve altogether. Fig. 4C-G2 shows another example at E7, in which NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted, Pdgfrb-positive perivascular cells are closely associated with Sox10-positive glial cells (Fig. 4D1,D2) and axons (and possibly neurons) caudal to the olfactory system (Fig. 4G1,G2). In one NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted embryo at E8 (HH stage 34), the entire olfactory nerve on one side is misplaced laterally, outside the cartilage that normally encloses it, apparently projecting towards large blood vessels containing NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells (Fig. 4H). On a nearby section from the same embryo, many Sox10-positive OECs (both NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted and untargeted) seem to have migrated away from the olfactory nerve altogether, instead associating with blood vessels containing NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells (Fig. 4I-I3). Taken together, these results suggest that vasculature containing NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells attracts both peripheral axons and glia.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Open in a new tab

Peripheral axons and glia seem to be attracted to blood vessels containing NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells. Parasagittal (A-G2) and coronal (H-I3) sections from embryos in which the cranial ectoderm had been targeted in ovo at E1 with NotchΔE/EGFP, using the Tol2 transposase/‘Tet-on’ electroporation system. Eggs were injected with doxycycline at E4. (A) In an E5 embryo, in situ hybridisation for Sox10 reveals developing OECs on the olfactory nerve. (A1-A3) Same section as A, immunostained for EGFP and Tubb3, with Sox10 shown as a false-colour overlay in A2,A3. A thin nerve branch (arrow) deviates from the olfactory nerve away from the forebrain (for orientation, see low-power inset in A2). The branch-point is near a developing blood vessel, whose wall contains NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells. (B-B3) In an E6 embryo, several untargeted Sox10-positive cells (arrowheads), presumably developing OECs, are found isolated in the mesenchyme at some distance from the olfactory nerve, near NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells. (C-D2) In an E7 embryo, in situ hybridisation for Pdgfrb followed by immunostaining for EGFP and Sox10 reveals that many NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells have formed Pdgfrb-positive perivascular cells, with which many Sox10-positive cells (presumably peripheral glial cells) are associated. This is far from the olfactory nerve: note the location of the olfactory epithelium at the top right. (E-G2) A nearby section of the same E7 embryo, shown at low-power in E-E3 for orientation (note the position of the olfactory epithelium and olfactory nerve towards the top right, and the forebrain and adenohypophysis towards the top left). In situ hybridisation for Lmo2 and immunostaining for EGFP and Tubb3 confirm the presence of peripheral axons (and possibly neurons) close to a large concentration of NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells that are associated with Lmo2-positive vascular endothelium. (H) In an E8 embryo (coronal section), the entire olfactory nerve on one side is misplaced laterally (yellow arrow) towards several large blood vessels whose walls contain NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells. The displaced olfactory nerve is in contact with another peripheral nerve, and no longer surrounded by cartilage (identified by immunostaining with an anti-Sox9 antibody that also cross-reacts with other SoxE family members), unlike the olfactory nerve on the other side. (I-I3) In a nearby section of the same E8 embryo, in situ hybridisation for Sox10 and immunostaining for EGFP and Tubb3 show that some Sox10-positive OECs – both untargeted (black/white arrowheads) and NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted (yellow arrowheads) – are found at a distance from axons, associated instead with blood vessels whose walls contain NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells. ah, adenohypophysis; bv, blood vessel; EGFP, enhanced GFP; fb, forebrain; oe, olfactory epithelium; on, olfactory nerve; pn, peripheral nerve. Scale bars: 100 µm.

DISCUSSION

In experiments originally aimed at testing the effect on olfactory ensheathing cell (OEC) development of prematurely activating Notch1, which is normally expressed in developing chicken OECs from E5 (Miller et al., 2016), we used the Tol2 transposase/‘Tet-on’ in ovo electroporation system (Sato et al., 2007; Watanabe et al., 2007) to drive NotchΔE, encoding a constitutively active form of mouse Notch1 (Kopan et al., 1996; Sato et al., 2008), in cranial neural crest-derived cells from E4. This proved to be sufficient to convert both frontonasal mesenchyme cells, and perhaps also developing OECs, to Pdgfrb-positive perivascular cells. Pdgfrb encodes a receptor tyrosine kinase required in pericytes during angiogenesis, for their recruitment to sprouting capillaries and proliferation (Lindahl et al., 1997; Hellström et al., 1999; Winkler et al., 2010). In the frontonasal mesenchyme at E5-7, ectopic NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted perivascular cells were found encircling Lmo2-positive vascular endothelium. Vegfr2 (Flk1, Kdr)-expressing angioblasts are found throughout the developing cranial mesenchyme in both chicken and mouse (Couly et al., 1995; Yoshida et al., 2008); in chicken, these initially dispersed Vegfr2-positive cells have all incorporated into blood vessels by E3-4 (Couly et al., 1995). Hence, expression of constitutively active Notch1 from E4 in cranial neural crest-derived frontonasal mesenchyme cells causes them to adopt a perivascular cell fate and associate with the vascular endothelium of nearby blood vessels.

NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted Pdgfrb-positive cells were also seen within the olfactory nerve, suggesting that constitutive Notch1 activation from E4 within developing OECs (which can first be identified at E3.5, by myelin protein zero immunoreactivity; Drapkin and Silverman, 1999) could be sufficient to convert them to a perivascular cell fate. Indeed, some of the NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted, Pdgfrb-positive cells on the olfactory nerve co-expressed the OEC marker Sox10 (Barraud et al., 2010), suggesting they were in the process of changing fate. Most NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted cells seemed to be excluded from the interior of the olfactory nerve and instead aggregated together at the edges, projecting away from the nerve. This may reflect the lack of blood vessels inside developing nerves until relatively late in development, given that we did not see many Lmo2-positive vascular endothelial cells inside the chicken olfactory nerve at E6.5-7 (in the rat sciatic nerve, blood vessels are first seen only at E18; Wanner et al., 2006). The presence of some untargeted Pdgfrb-positive cells within the olfactory nerve at E6.5-7 also suggests that perivascular cells are normally beginning to differentiate at this stage. Taken together, these data may also suggest that at least some of the perivascular cells of the olfactory nerve vasculature derive from developing OECs, in response to sustained Notch1 activation. This is in contrast to the trunk, where only endoneurial fibroblasts, and not endoneurial perivascular cells, derive from Schwann cell precursors (Joseph et al., 2004). Furthermore, since expression of the constitutively active Notch1 mutant protein was only activated in targeted cranial neural crest-derived cells following doxycycline injection at E4, our findings also reveal the plasticity of cranial neural crest-derived frontonasal mesenchyme and developing olfactory ensheathing glia.

Our results are consistent with previous work showing that constitutive Notch1 activation (via expression of the Notch1 intracellular domain) in trunk mesoderm-derived somite cells promotes adoption of a perivascular fate at the expense of a skeletal muscle fate (Ben-Yair and Kalcheim, 2008; Sato et al., 2008; Mayeuf-Louchart et al., 2014); they also extend this finding to cranial neural crest-derived cells. The Notch pathway plays critical roles in many aspects of vascular development, including perivascular cell recruitment and differentiation during vasculogenesis (i.e. the formation of new blood vessels de novo) in addition to maturation, stabilization and remodelling of the vasculature during angiogenesis (i.e. the formation of new blood vessels by sprouting from existing vessels) (reviewed by Gridley, 2007; Phng and Gerhardt, 2009; Gridley, 2010; Boucher et al., 2012). Our data suggest that constitutive Notch1 signalling from E4 in cranial neural crest-derived frontonasal mesenchyme and developing OECs promotes a perivascular cell fate. Since Notch signalling is required for neural crest-derived perivascular cell formation (High et al., 2007, 2008; Chang et al., 2012; Manderfield et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2014; Manderfield et al., 2015), this likely reflects a normal developmental process, whereby vascular endothelial cells expressing Notch ligands recruit adjacent frontonasal mesenchyme cells to form perivascular cells through sustained activation of Notch signalling.

Consistent with this hypothesis, sustained activation of Notch signalling [via exposure to Delta-like 4 (Dll4) from endothelial cells] is both sufficient and necessary for conversion of skeletal myoblasts to pericytes in vitro: silencing of Dll4 restores myogenesis (Cappellari et al., 2013). In vivo, expression of the Notch1 intracellular domain in MyoD-positive muscle cells also drives a pericyte fate, while occasional perivascular cells in wild-type embryos are derived from Myf5- or MyoD-expressing precursors (Cappellari et al., 2013). This suggests that Notch ligand production from vascular endothelium in skeletal muscle may sometimes induce a fate switch in adjacent myoblasts. Sustained Notch signalling is also required in vascular smooth muscle cells to suppress alternative fates and maintain the perivascular fate: in the absence of the Notch ligand Jagged1, mouse somite-derived vascular smooth muscle cells adopt a chondrocyte fate, which can lead to vessel ossification (Briot et al., 2014). Thus, sustained Notch signalling appears not only to promote, but also maintain, the perivascular cell fate.

We also found that vasculature containing NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted perivascular cells seemed to attract peripheral axons and their associated glia (OECs on the olfactory nerve; Schwann cells on all other nerves), with some Sox10-positive glial cells appearing to have left the nerve altogether. We identified Vegfa expression in NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted perivascular cells. Vegfa is expressed by pericytes in the developing retinal vasculature (where pericytes are neural crest-derived; Etchevers et al., 2001; Trost et al., 2013); in heterozygous VegfalacZ transgenic mice (in which lacZ under an independent ribosome entry site was inserted into the 3′ untranslated region of the Vegfa gene; Miquerol et al., 1999), retinal pericytes express beta-galactosidase (Darland et al., 2003). Vegfa is also secreted by perivascular cells induced from 10T1/2 cells by co-culturing with endothelial cells (Darland et al., 2003). Vegfa is not only a pro-angiogenic factor (reviewed by Jin et al., 2014; Moens et al., 2014) but is also secreted by Schwann cells, acting in an autocrine loop to enhance Schwann cell proliferation and migration, and also promoting axon outgrowth via Vegfr2 (reviewed by Rosenstein et al., 2010). Thus it is possible that Vegfa secreted by NotchΔE/EGFP-targeted perivascular cells attracts OECs/Schwann cells, and at least in some cases olfactory axons, towards the vasculature.

Overall, our data support and extend previous work showing that the Notch pathway is necessary for the formation of perivascular cells from the cranial neural crest (High et al., 2007, 2008; Chang et al., 2012; Manderfield et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2014; Manderfield et al., 2015), by showing that constitutively active Notch1 promotes a perivascular cell fate in frontonasal mesenchyme, and perhaps also in glial progenitors on the olfactory nerve, several days after the end of cranial neural crest migration. Intriguingly, constitutive activation of Notch signalling via expression of the Notch3 intracellular domain seems to promote the proliferation, but not the specification, of brain pericytes in zebrafish (Wang et al., 2014), suggesting that the activation of distinct Notch signalling pathways may have different outcomes during the development of perivascular cells.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Electroporation constructs

All electroporation constructs were kind gifts of Yoshiko Takahashi (Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan); the pT2K-NotchΔE-BI-EGFP construct (Sato et al., 2008) was used with the kind permission of Raphael Kopan (Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA). Constructs were prepared using the EndoFree Plasmid Maxi kit (Qiagen) to a stock concentration of 5 μg/μl. pCAGGS-T2TP (Kawakami and Noda, 2004; Sato et al., 2007) encodes Tol2 transposase under the control of the synthetic CAGGS promoter (Niwa et al., 1991); the Tol2-integratable pT2K-CAGGS-rtTA2SM2 construct (Sato et al., 2007) encodes the reverse (‘Tet-on’) tetracycline transactivator protein variant rtTA2SM2 (Urlinger et al., 2000); the Tol2-integratable, tetracycline-dependent pT2K-NotchΔE-BI-EGFP construct (Sato et al., 2008) encodes a constitutively active extracellular deletion mutant of mouse Notch1 (NotchΔE; Kopan et al., 1996) and EGFP, bidirectionally transcribed under the control of a single tetracycline-response element; the Tol2-integratable pT2K-CAGGS-EGFP control construct (Sato et al., 2007) encodes EGFP alone.

In ovo electroporation

Fertilised chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) eggs were obtained from commercial sources. All work with chicken embryos was conducted in accordance with the UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986. Eggs were incubated in a humidified atmosphere at 38°C for 25-28 h to reach Hamburger–Hamilton stages 6-8 (Hamburger and Hamilton, 1951) (between the head-fold stage and the 4-somite stage). Black ink (Fount India, Pelikan) was diluted to 1% in filtered phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and injected underneath the blastoderm to visualise the embryo. The cranial ectoderm and neural folds were co-electroporated with 1:1:1 pCAGGS-T2TP, pT2K-CAGGS-rtTA2SM2 and either pT2K-NotchΔE-BI-EGFP or control pT2K-CAGGS-EGFP, to a final concentration of 0.9 μg/μl each, mixed with Fast Green to a final dilution of 2% and sucrose to a final concentration of 8%. The positive electrode was placed in the yolk underneath the head process and perpendicular to the cranial–caudal axis of the embryo. The plasmid solution was micro-pipetted over the cranial ectoderm and the negative ‘spoon-type’ electrode brought down over the embryo, as described (Brown et al., 2012). An ECM 830 Square Wave Pulse generator (BTX Instrument Division, Harvard Apparatus, Inc.) was used to apply five 50-ms 5 V pulses at 100 ms intervals. The egg was sealed with Parafilm and returned to the incubator. At embryonic day (E)4, 500 μl of doxycycline solution (100 μg/μl doxycycline in water) was injected under the embryo. The egg was re-sealed and returned to the incubator until the desired stage. Surviving embryos were fixed in modified Carnoy's (6 volumes ethanol, 3 volumes 37% formaldehyde, 1 volume glacial acetic acid), dehydrated into ethanol, cleared in Histosol (National Diagnostics) and embedded in paraffin wax for sectioning at 6 μm on a rotary microtome (Microm).

Riboprobes

Chicken Lmo2 (Nakazawa et al., 2006) was a kind gift of Guojun Sheng (RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology, Kobe, Japan). Chicken Sox10 (Cheng et al., 2000) was a kind gift of Marianne Bronner (Caltech, Pasadena, CA, USA). An 803-bp fragment of chicken Pdgfrb cDNA, corresponding to base-pairs 1486-2288 (NCBI reference sequence XM_001233829.3) was PCR-amplified from cDNA (forward primer TAACGTGCTCTGCTGAAGGG; reverse primer CAGGAAGGTGTGCTTGTTGC), cloned into pDrive (Qiagen) using the Qiagen PCR cloning kit and sequenced (Biochemistry Department DNA Sequencing Facility, Cambridge, UK). A 608-bp fragment of chicken Vegfa cDNA, corresponding to base-pairs 631-1238 (NCBI reference sequence NM_205042.2) was similarly PCR-amplified (forward primer GCGGAAGCCCAACGAAGTTA; reverse primer TGTCCAGGCGAGAAATCAGG) and cloned into pDrive. PCR primers were designed and specificity checked using Primer-BLAST software from NCBI (Ye et al., 2012). The OligoCalc program (Kibbe, 2007) (http://www.basic.northwestern.edu/biotools/oligocalc.html) was used to check primer melting temperature and self-complementarity. Single-strand cDNA was prepared using Invitrogen's Superscript III First-Strand Synthesis System kit on total RNA extracted with Trizol (Invitrogen) from chicken embryos at E3.5 and E6.5. Digoxigenin-labelled antisense riboprobes were generated as described (Henrique et al., 1995).

In situ hybridisation on sections

Slides were de-waxed in Histosol (National Diagnostics) and rehydrated through a graded ethanol series into diethylpyrocarbonate (DEPC)-treated PBS. Digoxigenin-labelled antisense riboprobes diluted 1:250 to 1:1000 in hybridisation buffer [1x salt solution (0.2 M NaCl, 10 mM Tris pH 7.5, 5 mM NaH2PO4.H2O, 5 mM Na2HPO4, 5 mM EDTA), 50% formamide, 10% dextran sulfate, 1 mg/ml yeast tRNA, 1x Denhardt's solution] were hybridised to sections overnight at 68°C. Slides were washed three times in wash solution (50% formamide, 1× SSC, 0.1% Tween-20) for 30 min to one hour each at 70°C, then given two 10-min washes in MABT (1x maleic acid buffer with 0.1% Tween-20) (10× MAB: 1 M maleic acid, 1.5 M NaCl, pH 7.5) at room temperature. Slides were incubated for at least 2 h in blocking solution [1% blocking reagent (Roche), 20% heat-denatured normal sheep serum (Sigma) in MABT]. Alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-digoxigenin antibody (Roche) was diluted 1:1500 in blocking solution and slides were incubated in the antibody solution overnight at room temperature. After five 30-min washes in MABT, slides were equilibrated via two 10-min washes in NTMT (0.1 M NaCl, 0.1 M Tris, pH 9.5, 50 mM MgCl2, 0.1% Tween-20), and the colour reaction performed in 20 μl/ml NBT/BCIP (Roche) in NTMT. Once the colour had developed to the desired extent, sections were washed twice in distilled water and once in PBS, then fixed for 5 min in 4% formaldehyde (Thermo Scientific) in PBS.

Immunohistochemistry

Whether after fixation following in situ hybridisation as described in the preceding section, or after de-waxing and rehydrating untreated slides as described in the preceding section, slides were rinsed in PBS, blocked for 1 h at room temperature in 10% sheep serum in PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100 and then incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies in blocking solution. (When the antibody against cleaved Notch1 intracellular domain was used, antigen retrieval was performed prior to blocking, by heating the slides for 4 min until boiling in a microwave in 10 mM sodium citrate buffer solution, pH 6, followed by two washes in PBS.) After three 5-10 min washes in PBS, appropriately matched Alexa Fluor-conjugated secondary antibodies (Molecular Probes) were applied at 1:1000 in the same blocking solution and incubated at room temperature for 2-3 h. If three primary antibodies were used, a biotinylated (instead of Alexa Fluor-conjugated) secondary antibody was used against Tubb3 (1:50 goat anti-mouse IgG2a, Invitrogen, or 1:250 horse anti-mouse IgG, Vector Laboratories), and, after three 5-10 min washes in PBS, the slides were further incubated for 1-2 h at room temperature with Alexa Fluor 350-conjugated NeutrAvidin (Molecular Probes) diluted 1:100 in filtered PBS. After three 5-10 min washes in PBS, slides were mounted in Fluoromount G (Southern Biotech). Primary antibodies used were: anti-Acta2 (mouse IgG2a, Sigma-Aldrich A5228, 1:500); anti-EGFP (rabbit, Invitrogen A-6455, 1:500; mouse IgG1, Roche 1814460001, 1:500); anti-activated Notch1 (cleaved Notch1 intracellular domain) (rabbit, Abcam ab8925, 1:150); anti-Sox10 (Meng et al., 2011; Yardley and García-Castro, 2012) (rabbit, kind gift of Vivian Lee, Medical College of Wisconsin, WI, USA, 1:3000); anti-Tubb3 (neuronal class III beta-tubulin) (clone TUJ1, mouse IgG2a, Covance MMS-435P, 1:500).

Image capture and processing

Images were captured on a Zeiss AxioSkop 2 MOT compound microscope using QCapture Pro 6.0 software, a QImaging Retiga 2000R camera and an RGB pancake (QImaging), and processed using Adobe Photoshop CS6. To show co-localisation, bright-field in situ hybridisation images were inverted and inserted into the green channel only, then used as a false-colour overlay with immunofluorescence images of the same section.

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Yoshiko Takahashi (Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan), Raphael Kopan (Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA), Marianne Bronner (Caltech, Pasadena, CA, USA) and Guojun Sheng (RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology, Kobe, Japan) for providing plasmids. Thanks to Vivian Lee (Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA) for providing the anti-Sox10 antibody.

Footnotes

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing or financial interests.

Author contributions

C.V.H.B. and S.R.M. designed the study and wrote the paper. S.R.M. performed all of the experiments, analysed the data and prepared the figures. S.N.P. contributed some in situ hybridisation and immunostaining data used in the analysis.

Funding

S.R.M. was supported by a PhD research studentship from the Anatomical Society, with additional funding from the Cambridge Philosophical Society. S.N.P. was supported by the Wellcome Trust (PhD Studentship 102453/Z/13/Z) and the Cambridge Commonwealth Trust.

References

  1. Ando K., Fukuhara S., Izumi N., Nakajima H., Fukui H., Kelsh R. N. and Mochizuki N. (2016). Clarification of mural cell coverage of vascular endothelial cells by live imaging of zebrafish. Development 143, 1328-1339. 10.1242/dev.132654 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Armulik A., Genové G. and Betsholtz C. (2011). Pericytes: developmental, physiological, and pathological perspectives, problems, and promises. Dev. Cell 21, 193-215. 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.07.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barraud P., Seferiadis A. A., Tyson L. D., Zwart M. F., Szabo-Rogers H. L., Ruhrberg C., Liu K. J. and Baker C. V. H. (2010). Neural crest origin of olfactory ensheathing glia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 21040-21045. 10.1073/pnas.1012248107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ben-Yair R. and Kalcheim C. (2008). Notch and bone morphogenetic protein differentially act on dermomyotome cells to generate endothelium, smooth, and striated muscle. J. Cell Biol. 180, 607-618. 10.1083/jcb.200707206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bergwerff M., Verberne M. E., DeRuiter M. C., Poelmann R. E. and Gittenberger-de Groot A. C. (1998). Neural crest cell contribution to the developing circulatory system: implications for vascular morphology? Circ. Res. 82, 221-231. 10.1161/01.RES.82.2.221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Boucher J., Gridley T. and Liaw L. (2012). Molecular pathways of Notch signaling in vascular smooth muscle cells. Front. Physiol. 3, 81 10.3389/fphys.2012.00081 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Briot A., Jaroszewicz A., Warren C. M., Lu J., Touma M., Rudat C., Hofmann J. J., Airik R., Weinmaster G., Lyons K. et al. (2014). Repression of Sox9 by Jag1 is continuously required to suppress the default chondrogenic fate of vascular smooth muscle cells. Dev. Cell 31, 707-721. 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.11.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown C. Y., Eom D. S., Amarnath S. and Agarwala S. (2012). A simple technique for early in vivo electroporation of E1 chick embryos. Dev. Dyn. 241, 545-552. 10.1002/dvdy.23747 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cappellari O., Benedetti S., Innocenzi A., Tedesco F. S., Moreno-Fortuny A., Ugarte G., Lampugnani M. G., Messina G. and Cossu G. (2013). Dll4 and PDGF-BB convert committed skeletal myoblasts to pericytes without erasing their myogenic memory. Dev. Cell 24, 586-599. 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.01.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chang L., Noseda M., Higginson M., Ly M., Patenaude A., Fuller M., Kyle A. H., Minchinton A. I., Puri M. C., Dumont D. J. et al. (2012). Differentiation of vascular smooth muscle cells from local precursors during embryonic and adult arteriogenesis requires Notch signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 6993-6998. 10.1073/pnas.1118512109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cheng Y.-C., Cheung M., Abu-Elmagd M. M., Orme A. and Scotting P. J. (2000). Chick Sox10, a transcription factor expressed in both early neural crest cells and central nervous system. Dev. Brain Res. 121, 233-241. 10.1016/S0165-3806(00)00049-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Couly G., Coltey P., Eichmann A. and Le Douarin N. M. (1995). The angiogenic potentials of the cephalic mesoderm and the origin of brain and head blood vessels. Mech. Dev. 53, 97-112. 10.1016/0925-4773(95)00428-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Darland D. C., Massingham L. J., Smith S. R., Piek E., Saint-Geniez M. and D'Amore P. A. (2003). Pericyte production of cell-associated VEGF is differentiation-dependent and is associated with endothelial survival. Dev. Biol. 264, 275-288. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2003.08.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Doi H., Iso T., Sato H., Yamazaki M., Matsui H., Tanaka T., Manabe I., Arai M., Nagai R. and Kurabayashi M. (2006). Jagged1-selective Notch signaling induces smooth muscle differentiation via a RBP-Jkappa-dependent pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 28555-28564. 10.1074/jbc.M602749200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Drapkin P. T. and Silverman A.-J. (1999). Development of the chick olfactory nerve. Dev. Dyn. 214, 349-360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ehm O., Goritz C., Covic M., Schaffner I., Schwarz T. J., Karaca E., Kempkes B., Kremmer E., Pfrieger F. W., Espinosa L. et al. (2010). RBPJkappa-dependent signaling is essential for long-term maintenance of neural stem cells in the adult hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 30, 13794-13807. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1567-10.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Etchevers H. C., Vincent C., Le Douarin N. M. and Couly G. F. (2001). The cephalic neural crest provides pericytes and smooth muscle cells to all blood vessels of the face and forebrain. Development 128, 1059-1068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gage P. J., Rhoades W., Prucka S. K. and Hjalt T. (2005). Fate maps of neural crest and mesoderm in the mammalian eye. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 46, 4200-4208. 10.1167/iovs.05-0691 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gridley T. (2007). Notch signaling in vascular development and physiology. Development 134, 2709-2718. 10.1242/dev.004184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gridley T. (2010). Notch signaling in the vasculature. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 92, 277-309. 10.1016/S0070-2153(10)92009-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hamburger V. and Hamilton H. L. (1951). A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J. Morphol. 88, 49-92. 10.1002/jmor.1050880104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hellström M., Kalén M., Lindahl P., Abramsson A. and Betsholtz C. (1999). Role of PDGF-B and PDGFR-beta in recruitment of vascular smooth muscle cells and pericytes during embryonic blood vessel formation in the mouse. Development 126, 3047-3055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Henrique D., Adam J., Myat A., Chitnis A., Lewis J. and Ish-Horowicz D. (1995). Expression of a Delta homologue in prospective neurons in the chick. Nature 375, 787-790. 10.1038/375787a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. High F. A., Zhang M., Proweller A., Tu L. L., Parmacek M. S., Pear W. S. and Epstein J. A. (2007). An essential role for Notch in neural crest during cardiovascular development and smooth muscle differentiation. J. Clin. Invest. 117, 353-363. 10.1172/JCI30070 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. High F. A., Lu M. M., Pear W. S., Loomes K. M., Kaestner K. H. and Epstein J. A. (2008). Endothelial expression of the Notch ligand Jagged1 is required for vascular smooth muscle development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 1955-1959. 10.1073/pnas.0709663105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Jacob C. (2015). Transcriptional control of neural crest specification into peripheral glia. Glia 63, 1883-1896. 10.1002/glia.22816 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Jiang X., Rowitch D. H., Soriano P., McMahon A. P. and Sucov H. M. (2000). Fate of the mammalian cardiac neural crest. Development 127, 1607-1616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Jin Y., Kaluza D. and Jakobsson L. (2014). VEGF, Notch and TGFbeta/BMPs in regulation of sprouting angiogenesis and vascular patterning. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 42, 1576-1583. 10.1042/BST20140231 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Joseph N. M., Mukouyama Y.-S., Mosher J. T., Jaegle M., Crone S. A., Dormand E.-L., Lee K.-F., Meijer D., Anderson D. J. and Morrison S. J. (2004). Neural crest stem cells undergo multilineage differentiation in developing peripheral nerves to generate endoneurial fibroblasts in addition to Schwann cells. Development 131, 5599-5612. 10.1242/dev.01429 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kale S., Hanai J., Chan B., Karihaloo A., Grotendorst G., Cantley L. and Sukhatme V. P. (2005). Microarray analysis of in vitro pericyte differentiation reveals an angiogenic program of gene expression. FASEB J.. 19, 270-271. 10.1096/fj.04-1604fje [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kawakami K. and Noda T. (2004). Transposition of the Tol2 element, an Ac-like element from the Japanese medaka fish Oryzias latipes, in mouse embryonic stem cells. Genetics 166, 895-899. 10.1534/genetics.166.2.895 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kibbe W. A. (2007). OligoCalc: an online oligonucleotide properties calculator. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W43-W46. 10.1093/nar/gkm234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kopan R., Schroeter E. H., Weintraub H. and Nye J. S. (1996). Signal transduction by activated mNotch: importance of proteolytic processing and its regulation by the extracellular domain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 1683-1688. 10.1073/pnas.93.4.1683 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Korn J., Christ B. and Kurz H. (2002). Neuroectodermal origin of brain pericytes and vascular smooth muscle cells. J. Comp. Neurol. 442, 78-88. 10.1002/cne.1423 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Le Lièvre C. S. and Le Douarin N. M. (1975). Mesenchymal derivatives of the neural crest: analysis of chimaeric quail and chick embryos. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 34, 125-154. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Li Y., Hibbs M. A., Gard A. L., Shylo N. A. and Yun K. (2012). Genome-wide analysis of N1ICD/RBPJ targets in vivo reveals direct transcriptional regulation of Wnt, SHH, and hippo pathway effectors by Notch1. Stem Cells 30, 741-752. 10.1002/stem.1030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lindahl P., Johansson B. R., Levéen P. and Betsholtz C. (1997). Pericyte loss and microaneurysm formation in PDGF-B-deficient mice. Science 277, 242-245. 10.1126/science.277.5323.242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Liu H., Kennard S. and Lilly B. (2009). NOTCH3 expression is induced in mural cells through an autoregulatory loop that requires endothelial-expressed JAGGED1. Circ. Res. 104, 466-475. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.184846 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Liu H., Zhang W., Kennard S., Caldwell R. B. and Lilly B. (2010). Notch3 is critical for proper angiogenesis and mural cell investment. Circ. Res. 107, 860-870. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.218271 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Majesky M. W., Dong X. R., Regan J. N. and Hoglund V. J. (2011). Vascular smooth muscle progenitor cells: building and repairing blood vessels. Circ. Res. 108, 365-377. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.223800 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Manderfield L. J., High F. A., Engleka K. A., Liu F., Li L., Rentschler S. and Epstein J. A. (2012). Notch activation of Jagged1 contributes to the assembly of the arterial wall. Circulation 125, 314-323. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.047159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Manderfield L. J., Aghajanian H., Engleka K. A., Lim L. Y., Liu F., Jain R., Li L., Olson E. N. and Epstein J. A. (2015). Hippo signaling is required for Notch-dependent smooth muscle differentiation of neural crest. Development 142, 2962-2971. 10.1242/dev.125807 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Mayeuf-Louchart A., Lagha M., Danckaert A., Rocancourt D., Relaix F., Vincent S. D. and Buckingham M. (2014). Notch regulation of myogenic versus endothelial fates of cells that migrate from the somite to the limb. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 8844-8849. 10.1073/pnas.1407606111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Meng H., Yuan Y. and Lee V. M. (2011). Loss of sphingosine kinase 1/S1P signaling impairs cell growth and survival of neurons and progenitor cells in the developing sensory ganglia. PLoS ONE 6, e27150 10.1371/journal.pone.0027150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Miller S. R., Perera S. N., Benito C., Stott S. R. W. and Baker C. V. H. (2016). Evidence for a Notch1-mediated transition during olfactory ensheathing cell development. J. Anat. 229, 369-383. 10.1111/joa.12494 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Miquerol L., Gertsenstein M., Harpal K., Rossant J. and Nagy A. (1999). Multiple developmental roles of VEGF suggested by a LacZ-tagged allele. Dev. Biol. 212, 307-322. 10.1006/dbio.1999.9355 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Moens S., Goveia J., Stapor P. C., Cantelmo A. R. and Carmeliet P. (2014). The multifaceted activity of VEGF in angiogenesis - Implications for therapy responses. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 25, 473-482. 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2014.07.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Nagai H. and Sheng G. (2008). Definitive erythropoiesis in chicken yolk sac. Dev. Dyn. 237, 3332-3341. 10.1002/dvdy.21746 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Nakazawa F., Nagai H., Shin M. and Sheng G. (2006). Negative regulation of primitive hematopoiesis by the FGF signaling pathway. Blood 108, 3335-3343. 10.1182/blood-2006-05-021386 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Niwa H., Yamamura K. and Miyazaki J. (1991). Efficient selection for high-expression transfectants with a novel eukaryotic vector. Gene 108, 193-199. 10.1016/0378-1119(91)90434-D [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Noseda M., Fu Y., Niessen K., Wong F., Chang L., McLean G. and Karsan A. (2006). Smooth muscle alpha-actin is a direct target of Notch/CSL. Circ. Res. 98, 1468-1470. 10.1161/01.RES.0000229683.81357.26 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Parenti A., Bellik L., Brogelli L., Filippi S. and Ledda F. (2004). Endogenous VEGF-A is responsible for mitogenic effects of MCP-1 on vascular smooth muscle cells. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 286, H1978-H1984. 10.1152/ajpheart.00414.2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Phng L.-K. and Gerhardt H. (2009). Angiogenesis: a team effort coordinated by Notch. Dev. Cell 16, 196-208. 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.01.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Rosenstein J. M., Krum J. M. and Ruhrberg C. (2010). VEGF in the nervous system. Organogenesis 6, 107-114. 10.4161/org.6.2.11687 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Sato Y., Kasai T., Nakagawa S., Tanabe K., Watanabe T., Kawakami K. and Takahashi Y. (2007). Stable integration and conditional expression of electroporated transgenes in chicken embryos. Dev. Biol. 305, 616-624. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.01.043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Sato Y., Watanabe T., Saito D., Takahashi T., Yoshida S., Kohyama J., Ohata E., Okano H. and Takahashi Y. (2008). Notch mediates the segmental specification of angioblasts in somites and their directed migration toward the dorsal aorta in avian embryos. Dev. Cell 14, 890-901. 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.03.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Trost A., Schrödl F., Lange S., Rivera F. J., Tempfer H., Korntner S., Stolt C. C., Wegner M., Bogner B., Kaser-Eichberger A. et al. (2013). Neural crest origin of retinal and choroidal pericytes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 54, 7910-7921. 10.1167/iovs.13-12946 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Urlinger S., Baron U., Thellmann M., Hasan M. T., Bujard H. and Hillen W. (2000). Exploring the sequence space for tetracycline-dependent transcriptional activators: novel mutations yield expanded range and sensitivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 7963-7968. 10.1073/pnas.130192197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Wakamatsu Y., Endo Y., Osumi N. and Weston J. A. (2004). Multiple roles of SOX2, an HMG-box transcription factor in avian neural crest development. Dev. Dyn. 229, 74-86. 10.1002/dvdy.10498 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Wang Y., Pan L., Moens C. B. and Appel B. (2014). Notch3 establishes brain vascular integrity by regulating pericyte number. Development 141, 307-317. 10.1242/dev.096107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Wanner I. B., Guerra N. K., Mahoney J., Kumar A., Wood P. M., Mirsky R. and Jessen K. R. (2006). Role of N-cadherin in Schwann cell precursors of growing nerves. Glia 54, 439-459. 10.1002/glia.20390 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Watanabe T., Saito D., Tanabe K., Suetsugu R., Nakaya Y., Nakagawa S. and Takahashi Y. (2007). Tet-on inducible system combined with in ovo electroporation dissects multiple roles of genes in somitogenesis of chicken embryos. Dev. Biol. 305, 625-636. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.01.042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Winkler E. A., Bell R. D. and Zlokovic B. V. (2010). Pericyte-specific expression of PDGF beta receptor in mouse models with normal and deficient PDGF beta receptor signaling. Mol. Neurodegener. 5, 32 10.1186/1750-1326-5-32 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Woodhoo A., Alonso M. B. D., Droggiti A., Turmaine M., D'Antonio M., Parkinson D. B., Wilton D. K., Al-Shawi R., Simons P., Shen J. et al. (2009). Notch controls embryonic Schwann cell differentiation, postnatal myelination and adult plasticity. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 839-847. 10.1038/nn.2323 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Yardley N. and García-Castro M. I. (2012). FGF signaling transforms non-neural ectoderm into neural crest. Dev. Biol. 372, 166-177. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.09.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Ye J., Coulouris G., Zaretskaya I., Cutcutache I., Rozen S. and Madden T. L. (2012). Primer-BLAST: a tool to design target-specific primers for polymerase chain reaction. BMC Bioinformatics 13, 134 10.1186/1471-2105-13-134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Yoshida T., Vivatbutsiri P., Morriss-Kay G., Saga Y. and Iseki S. (2008). Cell lineage in mammalian craniofacial mesenchyme. Mech. Dev. 125, 797-808. 10.1016/j.mod.2008.06.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biology Open are provided here courtesy of Company of Biologists

RESOURCES