Abstract
Humans have been exploring space for almost 55 years but space travel comes with many psychological and physiological changes that astronauts have to adapt to, both during and post flight missions. Now, with the reality of such missions lasting years, maintaining proper health of the flight crew is a high priority. While conditions such as nausea, bone loss, renal calculi and depression have been recognized, and approaches to medical and surgical care in space considered, the influence of the microbiota could be of added significance in maintaining astronaut health. While probiotics have long been part of the Russian cosmonaut diet, their use for specific health concerns of women has not been assessed. In this article, we explore the ways in which the microbiome may influence the health of female astronauts during long space flights, and present a rationale for the use of probiotics.
Keywords: breast cancer, female astronauts, microbiota, probiotics, spaceflight, urinary tract infections
Since the first human was flown into space in 1961, there have been 543 astronauts/cosmonauts, of which 11% have been female [1]. In 1963, Valentina Tereshkova was the first woman in space, flying aboard Vostok 6. In orbit and during preflight training, astronauts are placed in a multistressor environment where they have to physically and psychologically adapt to multiple adverse conditions such as restricted diets, lack of sleep, isolation and harsh environmental conditions. Microgravity creates an environment vastly different from what the human body was built for. Without the compression of gravity, the back vertebrae separate, increasing body height [2]. Elevated excretion of calcium and phosphorus from bone results in rapid bone loss, which on long missions can lead to renal calculi and fractures [3]. Anxiety increases as the spacecraft moves further away from earth, and poorer food quality and hygiene compound this effect. With a compromised immune system, infections occur [4], and emergence of latent viruses is a concern [5–7]. Allergy symptoms can occur due to immune changes, and while antiviral drugs and various medications are included in the cargo, the shelf life of active ingredients is shorter in microgravity [8].
Men and women differ in many ways, which includes the risk of acquiring certain diseases. For example, on earth, cardiovascular disease (CVD) develops 7–10 years later in females than males due to the protective effects of estrogen during the female reproductive years [9]. Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are more common in women [10], while men have higher rates of kidney stones [11–13]. The prevalence of osteoporosis is higher in females than males, but mortality after fracture is higher in men than women [14,15]. As on earth, men and women adapt differently to certain conditions in space [16] and the risk of disease can also differ between them.
Manned missions to Mars are estimated to take 2–3 years, making it very difficult to return to earth if health issues arise. Thus, a priority for the success of long-term space explorations is the ability to minimize disease onset and the complications associated with them. This paper will explore how microbiome studies can be an important component of health management for women in zero gravity.
Human microbiome & space travel
The term ‘human microbiome’, was coined in 2001 by Joshua Lederberg who defined it as the “ecological community of commensal, symbiotic and pathogenic microorganisms that literally share our body space” [17]. These microorganisms consist of bacteria, archaea, viruses and eukaryotes, but the majority making up the human microbiome are bacteria (99%) [18], albeit this may change with future virome studies. While the terms ‘human microbiome’ and ‘human microbiota’ are often used interchangeably, the latter refers to the microbial taxa associated with humans, while the former refers to the collection of microbial taxa and their genes [19].
These bacterial communities are important in promoting health as they synthesize vitamins the host cannot make, salvage energy from indigestible compounds, create a competitive environment to prevent pathogen colonization, promote maturation and regulation of the immune system, contribute to vascular development and angiogenesis and promote integrity of epithelial barriers [20–24]. It is these collective traits that make our microbiota targets for maintaining health.
The healthy human microbiota contains a collection of: symbionts, which are bacteria that actively promote health; commensals, which are neither advantageous nor detrimental to the host; and pathobionts, which can promote pathology when conditions are altered in the host [25]. When there is microbial disruption, either by reduction of symbionts and/or an overgrowth of pathobionts, a breakdown in homeostasis will occur, leading to disease.
It has been observed that gut, nasal and oral bacterial profiles of astronauts change during both short- and long-term space missions [26–28]. These changes are associated with a decrease in the relative abundance of putative beneficial microorganisms from the genera Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus and an increase in opportunistic pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Clostridium spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Fusobacterium nucleatum [29,26]. It is still unknown what aspects of space travel cause these changes but animal studies under stimulated microgravity have mimicked what was found in humans [30]. Diet could also be a contributing factor, as microbial profiles change in isolated ground crew members fed the same diet as those in space [31]. This could be a consequence of food sterilization that kills lactobacilli and bifidobacteria. If this is the case, strong consideration should be made in favor of supplementing the diet of astronauts with probiotics to make up for the loss of these beneficial microbes.
One limitation of the above microbiota studies is that they were conducted on male astronauts, with no data available on how space travel affects the microbiota in females. A North American study showed that diet impacts the gut microbiota differently in males and females [32]. Thus, conditions in space that shape microbial profiles, whether it be diet, hormones, microgravity or radiation, could impact male and female astronauts differently. Some conditions that are a concern for women astronauts, with a role of bacteria, are addressed below and summarized in Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Summary of the potential effects of the female microbiota and probiotic interventions in modulating health and disease during long-term space missions. The human microbiota plays an important role in modulating the risks of various health conditions. Growing evidence suggests that probiotic interventions, when microbial profiles are distorted, may help to reduce the risk of breast cancer, UTIs, bacterial vaginosis and osteoporosis; as well as promoting reproductive and digestive health, robust immune response and managing anxiety.
UTI: Urinary tract infection.
UTIs
UTIs are recurrent problems during spaceflight [3] with an increased incidence in female astronauts compared with males [16]. An estimated 95% of all UTIs are caused by the uropathogens E. coli and Staphylococcus saprophyticus [33] due to the ability to bind to uroepithelial cells via adhesion molecules [34,35]. A possibility of why UTIs are a common problem during spaceflight could be the increase in virulence factors in response to microgravity [36,37]. For example, both pathogenic and nonpathogenic strains of E. coli exhibit enhanced adherence and invasion in vitro in response to microgravity. This increased adherence, coupled with the enhanced growth kinetics of E. coli during spaceflight, could be responsible for promoting disease development [38]. While studies to date have focused on the effects of space conditions on known pathogens, work should also be done to assess which normal constituents of the female urogenital tract are affected by microgravity and how this impacts host health.
Standard practice to treat UTIs on earth and in space is with antibiotics, but studies have shown that some pathogens become less susceptible to these drugs under microgravity, leading to higher minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) needed for eradication [39–41]. For example, the MIC of colistin and kanamycin for E. coli isolates aboard Salyut 7, increased from 4 mg/l to >16 mg/l [39]. If the antibiotic doses given to female astronauts in space to treat UTIs are the same as those on earth, the women may actually be receiving subinhibitory concentrations, which could be problematic. Such concentrations have been shown to induce increased expression of adhesins in S. saprophyticus and E. coli coinciding with promoting enhanced colonization of bladder and kidney cells, potentially leading to more severe and recurrent infections [33]. The idea of interfering with uropathogen ascension from the vagina and urethra to the bladder, by administering probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and L. reuteri RC-14 that produce anti-infective properties, has been tested in elderly women and shown to prevent UTIs to a similar extent to long-term, low-dose antibiotics, without the side effects [42]. So, this is worthy of consideration for female astronauts.
Vaginal & reproductive health
Based upon a small sample size of females who were in space for an average of 9 days, there was no evidence of adverse reproductive outcomes upon return to earth [3]. However, this study failed to address the ability to conceive and deliver a healthy infant after extended space travel. If the loss of lactobacilli reported in the gut also occurs in the vagina, the chances of conception significantly decrease, according to studies performed on earth [43] and the risk of bacterial vaginosis (BV) may also increase, along with its recurrence, with potential adverse effects on quality of life. The ability of probiotic lactobacilli to reduce recurrences of BV in women who are immune suppressed [44], and even to potentially treat the condition [45], is worthy of consideration. Given the importance of reproduction for humanity, it seems short-sighted to have not acquired more information on the female vaginal microbiome during space flight, and to have considered how best to manage common infections using probiotics.
Breast cancer
Radiation is a major hazard for space travel leading to various types of cancers in both female and male astronauts. Female astronauts, however, have a 20% higher risk of cancer development, largely driven by breast and ovarian cancers [46]. In addition to radiation exposure, another risk factor for breast cancer development in female astronauts could be due to changes in their circadian rhythm as a result of altered sleeping patterns during spaceflight. It has been reported that females with rotating work schedules, such as flight attendants and nurses, have a higher risk of breast cancer development [47–50], prompting the International Agency for the Research on Cancer (IARC) to classify circadian rhythm disruptions (CRD) as a ‘probable carcinogen’ [51].
Transcriptome profiling studies have shown that up to 10% of our genes are under circadian control [52,53], however our ‘second genome’, those of the trillions of microbes inhabiting our body, is also under control of this master clock [54,55]. Changes in these bacterial profiles and their function as a result of CRD are linked to metabolic diseases [56,55]. While no work has yet been done examining the effects between circadian disrupted microbiota and breast cancer development, evidence suggests there could be a link. In mice, Lactobacillus levels increase during their ‘sleeping’ phase [55] and those with circadian disruptions have lower levels of gut Lactobacillus compared with controls, with differences occurring as early as 4 weeks after repeated dysregulation [55,54]. These effects could be detrimental to the host, as Lactobacillus has been shown in vitro to inhibit breast cancer cell growth [57] and in vivo to protect against breast cancer development in mice [58].
There is some basis for considering probiotics to reduce the risk of breast cancer development in women, caused by either radiation or changes in one's microbiome as a result of CRD. Epidemiological studies have shown that women who drink fermented milk products have a lower incidence of breast cancer [59].
Other probiotic applications for space flight
Bone loss is a key concern during long-term space missions. A study on earth found that L. reuteri strain 6475 had the ability to increase bone density and prevent osteoporosis in ovariectomized mice, which mimics the postmenopausal state in humans [60]. Hormones, however, may play a role in how effective probiotics are in this condition, as another study, using the same strain, saw effects in males but not premenopausal female mice [61].
Probiotics could be a promising tool to treat inflammatory or stress-induced gastrointestinal discomfort as numerous clinical and animal studies have shown an improvement in pain associated with irritable bowel syndrome [62–64], a condition more common in women. One mechanism could be that certain probiotic strains regulate analgesic receptors. Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM has been shown to increase the expression of opioid and cannabinoid receptors on murine intestinal epithelial cells, leading to 20% better pain tolerance than controls [65].
The inclusion of fermented foods, even perhaps prepared fresh during flight, in the diet of astronauts may play a beneficial role in managing anxiety [66], enhancing immunity [67], promoting viral clearance after the re-emergence of latent viruses [68,69] and maintaining digestive health [70]. Such approaches are worthy of further investigation in the International Space Station, as a prelude to longer flights.
Conclusion & future perspective
With the increased interest in the role of the human microbiome in modulating health and disease here on earth, more efforts should be undertaken to study the effect of microgravity on gut, oral, breast, urinary and reproductive tract microbiota patterns in women. Transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses would provide the best understanding of how different microbes react during space flight. Future studies should examine how probiotics in dried and liquid forms are affected by microgravity and radiation; whether different strains might function better in space compared with on earth; appropriate dose for maximal health benefit; and recovery back to ‘normal’ upon re-entry to earth's atmosphere.
Executive summary
As more women become part of space travel, and as duration of flights significantly increases, consideration should be given to diseases that affect their well-being.
Even when ailments occur equally frequently in male and female astronauts, future studies need to include women as participants.
The commercial space flight industry that is being developed, provides an opportunity, along with the existing International Space Station, to acquire microbiota samples and study functional and abundance changes induced by microgravity.
The addition of fermented foods and probiotics should be considered as a staple in the astronaut diet to promote feminine health and potentially reduce urinary tract infection, bacterial vaginosis, anxiety, osteoporosis and breast cancer development.
Financial & competing interests disclosure
C Urbaniak is supported by the Translational Breast Cancer Research Studentship. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.
No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.
References
- Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest
- 1.Astronuats and Cosmonuts. www.worldspaceflight.com/bios/stats.php
- 2.Marshburn TH, Hadfield CA, Sargsyan AE, Garcia K, Ebert D, Dulchavsky SA. New heights in ultrasound: first report of spinal ultrasound from the International Space Station. J. Emerg. Med. 46(1), 61–70 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jones JA, Jennings R, Pietryzk R, Ciftcioglu N, Stepaniak P. Genitourinary issues during spaceflight: a review. Int. J. Impot. Res. 17(Suppl. 1), S64–S67 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Taylor PW, Sommer AP. Towards rational treatment of bacterial infections during extended space travel. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 26(3), 183–187 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mehta SK, Stowe RP, Feiveson AH, Tyring SK, Pierson DL. Reactivation and shedding of cytomegalovirus in astronauts during spaceflight. J. Infect. Dis. 182(6), 1761–1764 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pierson DL, Stowe RP, Phillips TM, Lugg DJ, Mehta SK. Epstein–Barr virus shedding by astronauts during space flight. Brain. Behav. Immun. 19(3), 235–242 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mehta SK, Cohrs RJ, Forghani B, Zerbe G, Gilden DH, Pierson DL. Stress-induced subclinical reactivation of varicella zoster virus in astronauts. J. Med. Virol. 72(1), 174–179 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- •.This paper illustrates the dangers within our microbiota, and viruses that can be delibilitating.
- 8.Du B, Daniels VR, Vaksman Z, Boyd JL, Crady C, Putcha L. Evaluation of physical and chemical changes in pharmaceuticals flown on space missions. AAPS J. 13(2), 299–308 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Maas AHEM, Appelman YEA. Gender differences in coronary heart disease. Neth. Heart J. 18(12), 598–602 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kumar S, Dave A, Wolf B, Lerma EV. Urinary tract infections. Dis. Mon. 61(2), 45–59 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Scales CD, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur. Urol. 62(1), 160–165 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Leusmann DB, Blaschke R, Schmandt W. Results of 5,035 stone analyses: a contribution to epidemiology of urinary stone disease. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol. 24(3), 205–210 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Daudon M, Doré J-C, Jungers P, Lacour B. Changes in stone composition according to age and gender of patients: a multivariate epidemiological approach. Urol. Res. 32(3), 241–247 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Guggenbuhl P. Osteoporosis in males and females: is there really a difference? Joint Bone Spine 76(6), 595–601 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cawthon PM. Gender differences in osteoporosis and fractures. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 469(7), 1900–1905 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mark S, Scott GBI, Donoviel DB, et al. The impact of sex and gender on adaptation to space: executive summary. J. Womens Health (Larchmt) 23(11), 941–947 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lederberg J. ‘Ome sweet’ omics – a genealogical treasury of words. Science 15(8) (2001). [Google Scholar]
- 18.Qin J, Li R, Raes J, et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 464(7285), 59–65 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ursell LK, Metcalf JL, Parfrey LW, Knight R. Defining the human microbiome. Nutr. Rev. 70(Suppl. 1), S38–S44 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ragupathy S, Esmaeili F, Paschoud S, Sublet E, Citi S, Borchard G. Toll-like receptor 2 regulates the barrier function of human bronchial epithelial monolayers through atypical protein kinase C zeta, and an increase in expression of claudin-1. Tissue Barriers 2, e29166 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rakoff-Nahoum S, Paglino J, Eslami-Varzaneh F, Edberg S, Medzhitov R. Recognition of commensal microflora by Toll-like receptors is required for intestinal homeostasis. Cell 118(2), 229–241 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hyun J, Romero L, Riveron R, et al. Human intestinal epithelial cells express interleukin-10 through Toll-like receptor 4-mediated epithelial-macrophage crosstalk. J. Innate Immun. 7(1), 87–101 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mazmanian SK, Liu CH, Tzianabos AO, Kasper DL. An immunomodulatory molecule of symbiotic bacteria directs maturation of the host immune system. Cell 122(1), 107–118 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Stappenbeck TS, Hooper LV, Gordon JI. Developmental regulation of intestinal angiogenesis by indigenous microbes via Paneth cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99(24), 15451–15455 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Round JL, Mazmanian SK. The gut microbiota shapes intestinal immune responses during health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 9(5), 313–323 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- •.An in-depth review of the importance of the microbiota in shaping the immune system and how these interactions influence health and disease.
- 26.Decelle JG, Taylor GR. Autoflora in the upper respiratory tract of Apollo astronauts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 32(5), 659–665 (1976). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Brown LR, Fromme WJ, Handler SF, Wheatcroft MG, Johnston DA. Effect of Skylab missions on clinical and microbiologic aspects of oral health. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 93(2), 357–363 (1976). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lencner AA, Lencner CP, Mikelsaar ME, et al. The quantitative composition of the intestinal lactoflora before and after space flights of different lengths. Nahrung 28(6–7), 607–613 (1984). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ilyin VK. Microbiological status of cosmonauts during orbital spaceflights on Salyut and Mir orbital stations. Acta Astronaut. 56(9–12), 839–850 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ritchie LE, Taddeo SS, Weeks BR, et al. Space environmental factor impacts upon murine colon microbiota and mucosal homeostasis. PLoS ONE 10(6), e0125792 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mardanov AV, Babykin MM, Beletsky AV, et al. Metagenomic analysis of the dynamic changes in the gut microbiome of the participants of the MARS-500 experiment, simulating long term space flight. Acta Naturae 5(3), 116–125 (2013). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bolnick DI, Snowberg LK, Hirsch PE, et al. Individual diet has sex-dependent effects on vertebrate gut microbiota. Nat. Commun. 5, 4500 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Goneau LW, Hannan TJ, MacPhee RA, et al. Subinhibitory antibiotic therapy alters recurrent urinary tract infection pathogenesis through modulation of bacterial virulence and host immunity. MBio doi: 10.1128/mBio.00356-15 (2015) (Epub ahead of print). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- •.Highlights an important area of research that has been overlooked in the past; showing the negative effects of subinhibitory doses of antibiotics.
- 34.Kuroda M, Yamashita A, Hirakawa H, et al. Whole genome sequence of Staphylococcus saprophyticus reveals the pathogenesis of uncomplicated urinary tract infection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102(37), 13272–13277 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Forde BM, Ben Zakour NL, Stanton-Cook M, et al. The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli EC958: a high quality reference sequence for the globally disseminated multidrug resistant E. coli O25b:H4-ST131 clone. PLoS ONE 9(8), e104400 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wilson JW, Ott CM, Höner zu Bentrup K, et al. Space flight alters bacterial gene expression and virulence and reveals a role for global regulator Hfq. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104(41), 16299–16304 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kim W, Tengra FK, Young Z, et al. Spaceflight promotes biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS ONE 8(4), e62437 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Klaus D, Simske S, Todd P, Stodieck L. Investigation of space flight effects on Escherichia coli and a proposed model of underlying physical mechanisms. Microbiology 143(2), 449–455 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Tixador R, Richoilley G, Gasset G, et al. Study of minimal inhibitory concentration of antibiotics on bacteria cultivated in vitro in space (Cytos 2 experiment). Aviat. Space. Environ. Med. 56(8), 748–751 (1985). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lapchine L, Moatti N, Gasset G, Richoilley G, Templier J, Tixador R. Antibiotic activity in space. Drugs Exp. Clin. Res. 12(12), 933–938 (1986). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Leys NMEJ, Hendrickx L, De Boever P, Baatout S, Mergeay M. Space flight effects on bacterial physiology. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents 18(2), 193–199 (2004). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Beerepoot MAJ, ter Riet G, Nys S, et al. Lactobacilli vs antibiotics to prevent urinary tract infections: a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial in postmenopausal women. Arch. Intern. Med. 172(9), 704–712 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Van Oostrum N, De Sutter P, Meys J, Verstraelen H. Risks associated with bacterial vaginosis in infertility patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. 28(7), 1809–1815 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hummelen R, Changalucha J, Butamanya NL, Cook A, Habbema JDF, Reid G. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and L. reuteri RC-14 to prevent or cure bacterial vaginosis among women with HIV. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 111(3), 245–248 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Anukam KC, Osazuwa E, Osemene GI, Ehigiagbe F, Bruce AW, Reid G. Clinical study comparing probiotic Lactobacillus GR-1 and RC-14 with metronidazole vaginal gel to treat symptomatic bacterial vaginosis. Microbes Infect. 8(12–13), 2772–2776 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Cucinotta FA. Space radiation risks for astronauts on multiple International Space Station missions. PLoS ONE 9(4), e96099 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.McNeely E, Gale S, Tager I, et al. The self-reported health of U.S. flight attendants compared with the general population. Environ. Health 13(1), 13 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Pukkala E, Auvinen A, Wahlberg G. Incidence of cancer among Finnish airline cabin attendants, 1967–1992. BMJ 311(7006), 649–652 (1995). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Schernhammer ES, Hankinson SE. Urinary melatonin levels and postmenopausal breast cancer risk in the Nurses' Health Study cohort. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 18(1), 74–79 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sankila R, Karjalainen S, Läärä E, Pukkala E, Teppo L. Cancer risk among health care personnel in Finland, 1971–1980. Scand. J. Work. Environ. Health 16(4), 252–257 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Straif K, Baan R, Grosse Y, et al. Carcinogenicity of shift-work, painting, and fire-fighting. Lancet Oncol. 8(12), 1065–1066 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ueda HR, Chen W, Minami Y, et al. Molecular-timetable methods for detection of body time and rhythm disorders from single-time-point genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101(31), 11227–11232 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Panda S, Antoch MP, Miller BH, et al. Coordinated transcription of key pathways in the mouse by the circadian clock. Cell 109(3), 307–320 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Voigt RM, Forsyth CB, Green SJ, et al. Circadian disorganization alters intestinal microbiota. PLoS ONE 9 (5), e97500 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Thaiss CA, Zeevi D, Levy M, et al. Transkingdom control of microbiota diurnal oscillations promotes metabolic homeostasis. Cell 159(3), 514–529 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- •.Interesting study examining the effects of jet lag on the microbiome. Fecal samples were analyzed from two individuals immediately after a trans-atlantic flight and 2 weeks after recovery from jet lag and samples were tested in germ-free mice.
- 56.Leone V, Gibbons SM, Martinez K, et al. Effects of diurnal variation of gut microbes and high-fat feeding on host circadian clock function and metabolism. Cell Host Microbe 17(5), 681–689 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Biffi A, Coradini D, Larsen R, Riva L, Di Fronzo G. Antiproliferative effect of fermented milk on the growth of a human breast cancer cell line. Nutr. Cancer 28(1), 93–99 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.De Moreno de LeBlanc A, Matar C, LeBlanc N, Perdigón G. Effects of milk fermented by Lactobacillus helveticus R389 on a murine breast cancer model. Breast Cancer Res. 7(4), R477–R486 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.van't Veer P, Dekker JM, Lamers JW, et al. Consumption of fermented milk products and breast cancer: a case–control study in The Netherlands. Cancer Res. 49(14), 4020–4023 (1989). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- •.Seminal population study showing the benefits of fermented food on lowering the risk of breast cancer development.
- 60.Britton RA, Irwin R, Quach D, et al. Probiotic L. reuteri treatment prevents bone loss in a menopausal ovariectomized mouse model. J. Cell. Physiol. 229(11), 1822–1830 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.McCabe LR, Irwin R, Schaefer L, Britton RA. Probiotic use decreases intestinal inflammation and increases bone density in healthy male but not female mice. J. Cell. Physiol. 228(8), 1793–1798 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Tiequn B, Guanqun C, Shuo Z. Therapeutic effects of Lactobacillus in treating irritable bowel syndrome: a meta-analysis. Intern. Med. 54(3), 243–249 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Aragon G, Graham DB, Borum M, Doman DB. Probiotic therapy for irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. (NY) 6(1), 39–44 (2010). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Distrutti E, Cipriani S, Mencarelli A, Renga B, Fiorucci S. Probiotics VSL#3 protect against development of visceral pain in murine model of irritable bowel syndrome. PLoS ONE 8(5), e63893 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Rousseaux C, Thuru X, Gelot A, et al. Lactobacillus acidophilus modulates intestinal pain and induces opioid and cannabinoid receptors. Nat. Med. 13(1), 35–37 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Hilimire MR, DeVylder JE, Forestell CA. Fermented foods, neuroticism, and social anxiety: an interaction model. Psychiatry Res. 228(2), 203–208 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Ashraf R, Shah NP. Immune system stimulation by probiotic microorganisms. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 54(7), 938–956 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Verhoeven V, Renard N, Makar A, et al. Probiotics enhance the clearance of human papillomavirus-related cervical lesions: a prospective controlled pilot study. Eur. J. Cancer Prev. 22(1), 46–51 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Khani S, Motamedifar M, Golmoghaddam H, Hosseini HM, Hashemizadeh Z. In vitro study of the effect of a probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus rhamnosus against herpes simplex virus type 1. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 16(2), 129–135 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Balakrishnan M, Floch MH. Prebiotics, probiotics and digestive health. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 15(6), 580–585 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

