Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 3.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2016 Oct 3;138(40):13107–13110. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b05480

A 1-hole Cu4S cluster with N2O reductase activity: a structural and functional model for CuZ*

Brittany J Johnson , William E Antholine , Sergey V Lindeman §, Michael J Graham , Neal P Mankad †,*
PMCID: PMC5378702  NIHMSID: NIHMS820915  PMID: 27685680

Abstract

During bacterial denitrification, two-electron reduction of N2O occurs at a [Cu44-S)] catalytic site (CuZ*) embedded within the nitrous oxide reductase (N2OR) enzyme. In this communication, an amidinate-supported [Cu44-S)] model cluster in its 1-hole (S = ½) redox state is thoroughly characterized. Along with its 2-hole redox partner and fully reduced clusters reported previously, the new species completes the two-electron redox series of [Cu44-S)] model complexes with catalytically relevant oxidation states for the first time. More importantly, N2O is reduced by the 1-hole cluster to produce N2 and the 2-hole cluster, thereby completing a closed cycle for N2O reduction. The title complex is thus not only the best structural model for CuZ* to date, but it also serves as a functional CuZ* mimic.

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name nihms820915u1.jpg


Regulation of nitrous oxide (N2O) concentration in the atmosphere is crucial due to N2O's key roles both as an anthropogenic greenhouse gas and as an ozone layer depletion agent.1,2 Lessons can be taken from nature, where atmospheric N2O concentrations are regulated by the bacterial denitrification metalloenzyme, nitrous oxide reductase (N2OR).3 The catalytic site in N2OR that is reactive under biological conditions is CuZ*,4 a [Cu44-S)] cluster characterized in the resting “1-hole” (3CuI:1CuII, S = ½) state5,6 and active in the “fully reduced” (4CuI, S = 0) state (Figure 1a).7 Under certain conditions, the CuZ* site in N2OR is replaced by CuZ,8 a [Cu44-S)(μ2-S)] cluster with a “2-hole” (2CuI:2CuII, S = 0) resting state that converts to a [Cu44-S)(μ2-SH)] cluster upon reduction to the 1-hole state, which shows relevant though limited N2O reductase activity (Figure 1b).9 Because N2OR catalyzes the two-electron reduction of N2O, three CuZ* redox states (4CuI, 3CuI:1CuII, and 2CuI:2CuII) spanning a two-electron range are plausibly relevant to catalysis.10,11

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Structures of (a) CuZ* (with N2O bound) and (b) CuZ sites of N2OR; (c) [Cu44-S)] model complexes.

The unique [Cu44-S)] structural motif and the rich redox chemistry of this catalytic site have presented challenges to synthetic modeling chemistry. Synthetic examples of [Cu44-S)] clusters supported by phosphorus ligands have only been isolated in the 4CuI state and do not react with N2O.12,13 Other relevant models that do access open-shell oxidation states feature [Cu33-S2)] or [Cu33-S)] cores that do not structurally model CuZ*.14,15 Similarly, functional models capable of N2O reduction feature [Cu32-S2)] or [Cu22-SR)] cores,16,17 limiting mechanistic insight to be gained for comparison to the tetracopper core of CuZ*.

We recently reported a [Cu44-S)] cluster (1), supported by nitrogenous amidinate ligands,18 that was characterized in its 2-hole state. Here, we report the synthesis and characterization of its one-electron reduction product, the 1-hole derivative (2). Along with the fully reduced clusters supported by diphosphine12 (3a) and diphosphinous amide13 (3b) ligands, this completes the catalytically relevant two-electron redox series of [Cu44-S)] model complexes for the first time (Figure 1c). Species 2 reduces N2O stoichiometrically, producing 1 + N2 and completing a synthetic cycle for N2O reduction (Scheme 1). The 1/2 redox pair thus represents both a structural and functional CuZ* model system.

Scheme 1. Synthetic cycle for N2O reduction.

Scheme 1

We previously showed that cluster 1 assembles upon addition of S-atom donors to a dicopper(I) bis(amidinate) precursor.18 The 2-hole, formally 2CuI:2CuII complex 1 was originally assigned as having a S = 0 ground state and a low-lying S = 1 excited state, the latter based on detection of a temperature-dependent solution magnetic moment and an EPR signal with non-Curie behavior. However, analysis of rigorously purified samples of 1 by SQUID magnetometry reveal near-zero χТ values up to 400 K (Figures S1), consistent with a diamagnetic species. Furthermore, one of the side products formed during assembly of 1 was characterized by X-ray crystallography. This monocopper(II) species resulting from S-atom insertion into two Cu-N bonds (Figure S2) gives an EPR signal matching that previously reported for 1 (Figure S3). Rigorously purified samples of 1, on the other hand, are EPR-silent. Considering this new data, we now assign 1 as being diamagnetic, while data consistent with paramagnetism in previous samples are now assigned to trace impurities.

Complex 1 possesses a reversible one-electron redox event at E°' = -1.28 V vs. Fc+/Fc (Fc = ferrocene).18 Chemical reduction of 1 with [K(18-crown-6)2][Fp] (Fp = FeCp(CO)2, E°' = -1.8 V vs. Fc+/Fc)19 produced 2 as its [K(18-crown-6)]+ salt, along with 1 equiv. of free 18-crown-6 and 0.5 equiv. of Fp2 (Scheme 1a). X-ray crystallographic analysis of 2 revealed two symmetrically independent tetracopper anions, one of which is shown in Figure 2. Both anions feature close contacts between an amidinate mesityl ring and the nearby [K(18-crown-6)]+ unit. Anionic 2 is isostructural to 1 and to dicationic 3a and 3b, with local C2v symmetry and an alternating up-down-up-down pattern for the bridging amidinates.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Solid-state structure of anionic 2 as a [K(18-crown-6)]+ salt. Hydrogen atoms, co-crystallized solvent, and a symmetrically independent second molecule have been omitted for clarity.

Key structural parameters for the pyramidal [Cu44-S)] pentahedra within 1, 2, and 3a are compared in Table 1. The 2-hole species 1 features a rectangular Cu4 base, with alternating short and long Cu-Cu distances. Upon reduction to 1-hole 2, the Cu4 base is less unsymmetric and approaches a square shape, with a smaller difference between short and long Cu-Cu distances. The core of fully reduced 3a is even closer to a square-based pyramid shape. Evidently, there is a well behaved pattern across the redox series: the Cu4 base gets more rectangular with increasing oxidation level, and gets more square with decreasing oxidation level. The geometry of the four-coordinate S center is less well behaved as a function of redox state, as measured by the τ4 parameter20 that does not follow a clear pattern across the series. The [Cu44-S)] core of 1-hole CuZ* has a seesaw shape rather than a pyramidal shape, with nearest-neighbor Cu-Cu distances spanning 2.56 to 3.36 Å.21

Table 1. Redox-dependent [Cu44-S)] bond metricsa.

graphic file with name nihms820915u2.jpg
1 (2-hole)b 2 (1-hole)c 3a (0-hole)d
Cu1-Cu2 2.4226(6) 2.502(1) 2.869(1)
Cu2-Cu3 3.0353(6) 2.809(1) 3.128(1)
Cu3-Cu4 2.4226(6) 2.532(1) 2.869(1)
Cu1-Cu4 3.0353(6) 2.831(1) 3.128(1)
τ4(S)e 0.76 0.90 0.59
a

Bond distances in Å.

b

From ref 18.

c

For one of two molecules in the asymmetric unit.

d

From ref 12.

e

For μ4-S ligand: τ4 is 1.00 for Td and 0.00 for D4h, see ref 20.

The S = ½ species 2 was characterized by X-band and Q-band EPR spectroscopy. The g-values for the axial signal were not readily obtained from the X-band spectrum (Figure 3a) but were well resolved in the Q-band spectrum (Figure S4): g = 2.090 and g = 2.043. Resolved lines on the high- and low-field sides of the X-band spectrum (Figure S5) were attributed to Cu hyperfine splitting, and values of A = 100 MHz and A = 15 MHz were obtained by fitting the X-band and Q-band spectra. The 2nd derivative X-band spectrum emphasizes fine structure for the 13-line pattern resulting from four equivalent Cu centers, and the simulated spectrum fits the experimental data well (Figure 3b). The Cu hyperfine coupling in 2 is small in magnitude relative to typical cupric species. A previous 1-hole [Cu33-S)] model exhibited an isotropic signal (g = 2.095) with a similarly small Cu hyperfine constant (97 MHz).15 The EPR signatures for 1-hole CuZ* and CuZ are distinct from 2 in that they have g > g and larger hyperfine constants (Table 2).9

Figure 3.

Figure 3

X-band EPR data (9.632 GHz, 9.9 K, 2-MeTHF) for 2 shown as (a) 1st derivative, (b) 2nd derivative overlay of simulation (red) and experimental (black); (c) Mulliken spin density plot (0.001 isovalue) for 2′ calculated by DFT.

Table 2. Redox-dependent spectroscopic properties.

1a 2 CuZb,c CuZb,d CuZ*b,d
g 2.043 2.152 2.160
g 2.090 2.042 2.043
Ae 15 168 182, 69
Ae 100 60 75, 60
λmaxf 561(470)h 566 546(670)h 694 680
εg 14,000i 8,600 10,000i 3,000 4,500
a

From ref 18.

b

From ref 9.

c

2-hole.

d

1-hole.

e

In MHz.

f

In nm.

g

In M-1cm-1.

h

Shoulder.

i

For main peak.

Based on the EPR data for 2, the formally 3CuI:1CuII:S2- complex can be viewed as an admixture of two limiting resonance contributors: a delocalized 4Cu1.25:S2- mixed-valent species, and a 4CuI:S- sulfur-radical species. To our knowledge, the literature of sulfur EPR spectroscopy does not include any four-coordinate examples for comparison to the S center in 2.22-24 To probe electronic structure further, we analyzed a model complex 2′, in which the mesityl groups had been replaced with methyl groups, using DFT computations. The computed bond distances within the [Cu44-S)] core for 2′ matched experimental values well (Table S1). The Mulliken spin density for 2′ was found to be delocalized, with equal populations on each of the four Cu centers and with the S center having the most spin density (32%) of any single atom (Figure 3c). This computational observation indicates a high degree of covalency in the [Cu44-S)] core.

Complexes 1 and 2 are purple. Complex 1 features a strong absorbance at 561 nm (ε = 14,000 M-1cm-1) with a shoulder at 470 nm.18 Upon reduction (Figure 4a), this feature shifted slightly in 2 to 566 nm and got measurably less intense (ε = 8,600 M-1cm-1). Absorption data for CuZ* is available only for the 1-hole state. CuZ has been characterized in both its 2-hole and 1-hole states (Table 2): a large red-shift and a decrease in intensity are observed upon reduction,9 and these transitions previously have been attributed to S2--to-Cu charge transfer.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(a) UV-Vis data for 1 (red) and 2 (black); (b) natural transition orbitals (0.04 isovalues) for 578-nm excitement of 2′ calculated by TD-DFT. Relative contributions to NTO 125β: S, 23%; Cu, 14% each.

TD-DFT calculations for 2′ predicted a characteristic feature at 578 nm (ε = 6,000 M-1cm-1), and natural transition orbital (NTO) analysis25 indicated that this transition involves excitation of a β-electron from NTO 116β to NTO 125β (Figure 4b). NTO 116β is predominantly a linear combination of four Cu 3dxz orbitals, while NTO 125β (the LUMO) has significant S 3px character. The dominant electronic transition thus clearly involves charge transfer from the four Cu centers to the S center and resembles a delocalized Cu 3d to Cu-S σ* transition. TD-DFT calculations for 1′ correctly predicted an increase in intensity (to ε = 16,000 M-1cm-1) and the presence of a shoulder, though not the lack of energy shift.

A reaction was observed when solutions of 2 were exposed to N2O (1 atm) at -78°C. 1H NMR analysis indicated that 2 had been oxidized to 1 in up to 89% yield (Scheme 1b). Under certain conditions, evolution of N2 was detected by headspace GC-MS analysis and comparison to control reactions in the absence of 2 under identical experimental conditions. Evolution of 15N2 was detected when 15N2O was used, verifying that the liberated nitrogen derived from nitrous oxide. Addition of electrophiles Me3SiCl or PhC(O)Cl to the final product mixtures produced (Me3Si)2O or PhC(O)OC(O)Ph, consistent with the presence of nucleophilic O2-. Collectively, these observations establish that the reaction shown in Equation 1 was taking place. Due to difficulties in accurately quantifying the N2 and O2- produced, the value of n in Equation 1 is ambiguous at this time. Our working hypothesis is that two molecules of 2 cooperate to reduce N2O by two electrons, with one cluster activating the N2O substrate and the other acting as a sacrificial reductant. Regardless, complex 2 is the first synthetic [Cu4S] complex to exhibit N2O reactivity, and thus opens a new avenue of investigation in N2O reductase research. Ongoing studies in our laboratory are aimed at detecting intermediates along the N2O reduction pathway and elucidating the reduction mechanism.

2+nN2O1+nN2+nO2- (Eq. 1)

In conclusion, the first 1-hole [Cu44-S)] complex has been synthesized and thoroughly characterized, completing the two-electron redox series of [Cu44-S)] model complexes. Structural, spectroscopic, and computational evidence is consistent with highly covalent bonding within the [Cu44-S)] core. This redox-active [Cu44-S)] system is also a functional mimic for CuZ*, participating in a synthetic cycle for N2O reduction. The title compound thus can be viewed as both a structural and functional model for CuZ*.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

Acknowledgments

Funds to N.P.M. were provided by NIH/NIGMS (R01 GM116820), the UIC Dept. of Chemistry, and a Sloan Research Fellowship. EPR facilities are supported by NIH (National Biomedical EPR Center Grant EB001980). SQUID measurements were funded by the International Institute for Nanotechnology. (State of Illinois DCEO Award 10-203031) and Northwestern University. Prof. Yoshitaka Ishii (UIC) provided access to a UV-Vis spectrometer, and Prof. Danna Freedman (Northwestern) to a SQUID magnetometer. Yeni Yung assisted with headspace GC-MS analysis. Prof. Justin Walensky (Missouri) generously shared unpublished data relevant to Figure S2.

Funding Sources: No competing financial interests have been declared.

Footnotes

Supporting Information. The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website.

Procedures & supporting data (PDF)

Crystallographic data (CIF)

References

  • 1.Thomson AJ, Giannopoulos G, Pretty J, Baggs EM, Richardson DJ. Philos Trans R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci. 2012;367:1157. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ravishankara AR, Daniel JS, Portmann RW. Science. 2009;326:123. doi: 10.1126/science.1176985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pauleta SR, Dell'Acqua S, Moura I. Coord Chem Rev. 2013;257:332. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Johnston EM, Dell'Acqua S, Ramos S, Pauleta SR, Moura I, Solomon EI. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:614. doi: 10.1021/ja411500p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chen P, Cabrito I, Moura JJG, Moura I, Solomon EI. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:10497. doi: 10.1021/ja0205028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ghosh S, Gorelsky SI, George SD, Chan JM, Cabrito I, Dooley DM, Moura JJG, Moura I, Solomon EI. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:3955. doi: 10.1021/ja068059e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ghosh S, Gorelsky SI, Chen P, Cabrito I, Moura, Moura I, Solomon EI. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:15708. doi: 10.1021/ja038344n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pomowski A, Zumft WG, Kroneck PMH, Einsle O. Nature. 2011;477:234. doi: 10.1038/nature10332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Johnston EM, Dell'Acqua S, Pauleta SR, Moura I, Solomon EI. Chem Sci. 2015;6:5670. doi: 10.1039/c5sc02102b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gorelsky SI, Ghosh S, Solomon EI. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:278. doi: 10.1021/ja055856o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Solomon EI, Heppner DE, Johnston EM, Ginsbach JW, Cirera J, Qayyum M, Kieber-Emmons MT, Kjaergaard CH, Hadt RG, Tian L. Chem Rev. 2014;114:3659. doi: 10.1021/cr400327t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yam VWW, Lee WK, Lai TFJ. J Chem Soc, Chem Commun. 1993:1571. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Johnson BJ, Lindeman SV, Mankad NP. Inorg Chem. 2014;53:10611. doi: 10.1021/ic501720h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Brown EC, York JT, Antholine WE, Ruiz E, Alvarez S, Tolman WB. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:13752. doi: 10.1021/ja053971t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Di Francesco GN, Gaillard A, Ghiviriga I, Abboud KA, Murray LJ. Inorg Chem. 2014;53:4647. doi: 10.1021/ic500333p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bar-Nahum I, Gupta AK, Huber SM, Ertem MZ, Cramer CJ, Tolman WB. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:2812. doi: 10.1021/ja808917k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Esmieu C, Orio M, Torelli S, Le Pape L, Pécaut J, Lebrun C, Ménage S. Chem Sci. 2014;5:4774. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Johnson BJ, Antholine WE, Lindeman SV, Mankad NP. Chem Commun. 2015;51:11860. doi: 10.1039/c5cc04675k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Connelly NG, Geiger WE. Chem Rev. 1996;96:877. doi: 10.1021/cr940053x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yang L, Powell DR, Houser RP. Dalton Trans. 2007:955. doi: 10.1039/b617136b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Brown K, Tegoni M, Prudêncio M, Pereira AS, Besson S, Moura JJ, Moura I, Cambillau C. Nat Struct Biol. 2000;7:191. doi: 10.1038/73288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Imada Y, Nakano H, Furukawa K, Kishi R, Nakano M, Maruyama H, Nakamoto M, Sekiguchi A, Ogawa M, Ohta T, Yamamoto Y. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138:479. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b10774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.van Gastel M, Lubitz W, Lassmann G, Neese F. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:2237. doi: 10.1021/ja038813l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hasegawa A, Williams F. Chem Phys Lett. 1977;45:275. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Martin RL. J Chem Phys. 2003;118:4775. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

RESOURCES