Abstract
Environmental occurrence of Aspergillus and other fungal spores are hazardous to humans and animals. They cause a broad spectrum of clinical complications. Contamination of aflatoxins in agri-food and feed due to A. flavus and A. parasiticus result in toxicity in humans and animals. Recent advances in aspergillus genomics and aflatoxin management practices are encouraging to tackle the challenges posed by important aspergillus species.
Keywords: Aspergilli, Polyketides, Aflatoxins, Toxicity, Genomics
Introduction
Aspergillus species influence human and animal health directly and indirectly with a significant economic impact on the society. A. flavus and A. parasiticus are the two major species that produce aflatoxins. Several mycotoxins are reported from several other mycotoxigenic fungi of which the aflatoxins are the most toxic and damaging polyketides [1]. Economically important crops such as maize, rice, cottonseed, peanuts, and spices are all susceptible for contamination of aflatoxin. A. flavus is the major contributor of aflatoxin in pre and post-harvest agricultural food and feed. It is a major global challenge to manage Aspergillus infections in humans and aflatoxin contamination in crops and other food products [2]. Four types of aflatoxins are relevant for humans, animals, agro—food and feeds. These are aflatoxin B1, B2, G1 and G2.
Approximately 25% of the crops are considered contaminated by mycotoxins of which aflatoxin B1 is the major toxin (FAO) [3]. Several food materials such as cereals, nuts, milk, spices, vegetables, fruits, oils and meat are prone for aflatoxin contamination. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) conducted evaluation of several chemicals of their carcinogenic potential and classified aflatoxins as most potent natural, known human carcinogens. In view of toxic and carcinogenic effects of aflatoxin contaminated foods, US department of Agriculture (USDA) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) set the tolerance limit of 20 ppb on foods. EU countries allow much lower ppb concentration of Aflatoxins. Accepted levels for toxins are variable for various foods in different countries.
Aflatoxins are polyketide compounds synthesized by secondary metabolic pathway in Aspergilli. As they are carcinogenic, teratogenic and mutagenic in nature, it is a real challenge to prevent and detoxify these compounds. The polyketide biosynthetic machinery imparts the potential to secrete aflatoxins in Aspergillus flavus isolates. This pathway also contributes to structural and functional diversity of various other polyketides produced by different Aspergillus species. Current review focuses on some important aspects of aflatoxins of Aspergilli relevant to human health.
Aflatoxin Producers
Aspergillus species are the main source of aflatoxins in the environment. These species are ubiquitous and universal in distribution. The high ecological, biological and metabolic diversity of Aspergillus species led to exploration of secondary metabolites among these species. The medical 4, agricultural and biotechnological importance of Aspergillus species is realized well in the recent past.
Morphological and taxonomical features of Aspergilli have some similar and few distinct characters. A. flavus, A. parasiticus are uniseriate and biseriate, and have mostly dense conidiophores. A. flavus and A.parasiticus are known to synthesize aflatoxins. Recent researches show that twenty species of Aspergilli are capable of producing aflatoxins. Three sections of the genus Aspergillus, section Flavi, Nidulantes and Ochraceorosei are reported to secrete these aflatoxins. These toxins are difuranocoumarin compounds, designated as aflatoxin B1, B2, G1 and G2 based on their blue or green fluorescence under U.V. light and the relative mobility in thin layer chromatography. Others include P1, Q1, B2A, G2A which are formed as a result of biotransformation or metabolism of aflatoxins in humans and animals [5]. Aflatoxin M1 is a hydroxylated form of aflatoxin B1 formed in animal tissues and fluids as a metabolite of B1 [6].
The understanding of the secretion of aflatoxin by A. flavus came to light during severe outbreak of Turkey X disease in 1961 in U.K. which leads to death of a number of Turkey birds and several other farm animals. At that time aflatoxin is considered as an invisible fluorogenic polyketide compound secreted by A. flavus. Subsequently the compounds were designated as “A” for the genus Aspergillus and “FLA” for the species flavus and toxins as they are toxic. The negative effects of aflatoxin production on crops and human health lead to economic losses.
Aflatoxin Contamination in Food Crops and Feed
Aflatoxin contamination is often observed in several food materials such as cereals, milk, spices, vegetables, fruits, nuts, oils and meat etc. [7, 8]. Cereal grains such as corn, rice, barley, wheat, sorghum, and soybean are also susceptible for A. flavus contamination and thereby AFB1 accumulation. Aflatoxins are produced on cereals both in field (in plants) and storage (in grains). Rice and sorghum, important staple food in various countries are highly susceptible for aflatoxin contamination [9, 10]. Chronic exposure to aflatoxin contaminated food can lead to cancer, nutritional deficiency leading to morbidity and mortality. Hence, the levels of aflatoxins are being monitored strictly in various countries and stipulated guidelines for international trade are also (Fig. 1) formulated. The cut off values for aflatoxin in food are variable in various countries (Table 1).
Table 1.
Country | Food items | Limits (µg/kg) |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | Nuts, figs, and related products | 2–12 |
United States | Milk, dairy products, Barley, cocoa, coffee, confectionery, corn/maize copra, dairy, dried fruit, feeds, ground nuts/peanuts, infant formula, oats, rice, rye, sorghum, soy, spices, tree nuts, and wheat | 0.5–20 |
European union | Groundnut, peanuts, spices and other food stuff | 2–12 |
Australia | All the food stuff except peanuts Peanuts and related products |
5 |
15 | ||
India | Nuts, spices, cereals and all other food products | 30 |
China | Rice, sorghum, barley, nuts etc. | 5–50 |
Japan | All the food stuffs | 10 |
A high level scientific committee FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) and WHO (World Health Organisation) on food additives estimated potency values for AFB1 from the epidemiological data. Several reports indicate groundnuts are the main susceptible products for aflatoxin contamination [11]. The US department of Agriculture (USDA) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) set a tolerance limit of 20 ppb for aflatoxins in view of their toxic effects on foods. However, FDA allows more than 20 ppb in corn and cottonseed meal to be fed for livestock (www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/).
Besides groundnuts, cotton seed and cotton bolls are also susceptible to aflatoxin contamination. Tree nuts such as almonds, walnuts and pistachios also reported to suffer contamination of AFB1 to a lesser degree. Groundnuts get infected with aflatoxigenic Aspergilli from soil through seed pods. The contamination of toxins can occur in ground nut kernels prior to harvest or during drying and storage also. European union fixed a cut of value of total aflatoxins of 4ug/kg in dried fruits for human use.
Spices
Frequent contamination of Aflatoxin in spices in tropical countries is attributed to atmospheric temperature, humidity and the drying and processing conditions. Several countries reported contamination of aflatoxin in ground red pepper [12–14]. Several other spices such as cumin, black pepper, cardamom, ginger, coriander etc. were also reported to have contamination of A. flavus and aflatoxins to a lesser degree compared to cereals [15].
Products
Aflatoxin B1 when ingested by animals in the contaminated feed is converted into a major metabolite aflatoxin M1 which is not eliminated or destroyed during pasteurization. Such contamination of aflatoxin M1 and M2 are reported from different countries [16, 17].
AFB1 and AFB2 will be converted to AFM1 and AFM2 in liver and excreted in the milk when the animal ingests aflatoxin in its feed [18]. Hence dairy products are contaminated with AFM1 and AFM2. The commission of European communities established a limit for AFM1 that is 50 µg/kg for milk (www.efsa.europa.eu). Similar regulations are made in developed countries.
The animal food, basically meat and their products are susceptible to aflatoxin contamination as they receive contaminated animal feed [19]. Experimental evidence for aflatoxin metabolites in chicken are well documented [20, 21]. Several animal feed concentrates including cereal grains, soybean products, oil cakes etc. prepared from groundnuts, as base cotton seed, sunflower, palm, copra and fish meal are reported to have contamination of Aflatoxins. Regulation for aflatoxins is being exercised for animal feed in some countries [19]. The total permissible limit for aflatoxins in animal feed range from 0 to 50 ppb with an average of 20 ppb (FAO 2004). However, in developing countries 25–50% show more than 20 ppb of aflatoxins. The range observed is 100–1000 ppb. The permeable limit is 4–20 ppb for feed and food products based on WTO–stipulations.
Aflatoxicosis
Animal Health
The severity of toxicity due to intake of aflatoxin depends on species, age, sex and nutritional status. Major action of toxicity is observed on liver resulting in hepatic damage and observed decreased milk and egg production. Aflatoxicosis in animals depicts symptoms of gastrointestinal dysfunction, reduced reproductivity, reduced feed utilization and efficiency, anaemia and jaundice.
In nursing animals if fed with aflatoxin contaminated feed aflatoxin B1 will be converted to the metabolite M1 which will be excreted in milk of dairy cattle. The carcinogenic effect of aflatoxins has been studied and reported in detail. Aflatoxin B1, M1, and G1 are known to cause different types of cancers in different animal species. AFB1, is the only toxin identified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) with sufficient evidence as carcinogen.
Human Health
Several effects of aflatoxin exposure are well studied. Acute aflatoxicosis in humans and animals is reported worldwide. Aflatoxicosis due to chronic exposure at high and moderate concentrations can lead to acute primary Aflatoxicosis. Symptoms include haemorrhage, acute liver damage, edema, digestion problems and death.
Primary aflatoxicosis results from chronic exposure to Factors Influencing Aflatoxin Production at low to moderate levels. Impaired digestion and slow rate of growth are the main symptoms. Chronic aflatoxicosis includes terratogenic effect associated with congenital malformation. Aflatoxins are also mutagenic and carcinogenic. Mutagenic effect leads to mutation in genetic code, alteration in DNA which lead to chromosomal breaks, rearrangements, loss or gain of chromosome or changes within a gene.
Mechanism of Action of Aflatoxins
Epidemiological data from studies in African countries, particularly in South Africa, South East Asia and India implicate aflatoxins in the hepatobiliary carcinoma, malnutrition, kwashiorkar and marasmus [22–24]. Aflatoxins are clearly associated with aflatoxicosis and other health problems in the humans, livestock and domestic animals. All the types of aflatoxins are lipolytic in nature and are easily absorbed across cell membranes from the site of exposure such as gastrointestinal, respiratory tracts and enter into the blood stream, then spread to various tissues and to the liver. They are metabolized in liver to reactive epoxide intermediate or hydroxylated to less toxic aflatoxin M1. In humans and susceptible animals, cytochrome P450 microsomal enzyme converts AFB1 to an epoxide which binds to DNA and albumin in the blood, forms an adduct leading to DNA damage [25]. The epoxide preferentially binds to mitochondrial DNA resulting in hepatocarcinogenesis. The binding of AFB1 to DNA at guanine site in liver cells affect the genetic code of enzymes which regulate cell growth [26]. This results in formation of tumors. Aflatoxins are known to bind and interfere with enzymes and substrates that are needed in the initiation, transcription and translation processes involved in protein synthesis by forming adducts with DNA, RNA and proteins.
Bioactive Molecules of Aspergillus Species
The versatility of Aspergillus species to produce structurally and biologically complex active molecules is still not well understood.
Aspergillus species particularly Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus secrete a variety of polyketides which include toxins, aflatoxins and virulent factors. The virulence of Aspergillus species is multifactorial in nature. Some virulence factors are polyketides and some are multifunctional protein molecules such as ribonucleases. The mechanism of colonization of a niche in the host and immunosuppression, immune invasion in case of human host is not well understood. Similarly, the host-pathogen mechanism in plant system is also not well understood particularly for A. flavus. A. flavus is metabolically a versatile; saprophyte obtains nutrients for growth and has the ability to secrete hydrolases to degrade complex carbohydrate and protein substrates [27].
Several A. flavus isolates are known to produce elastases, which are proteinases in nature, have relevance to human lung infection and invasion [28]. A. flavus also secretes polygalactouronases or pectinases that hydrolyze long chain pectins in plant tissues to enter and invade for the nutrients. A specific pectinase was identified to have strong correlation with spread of A. flavus isolates between locules of cotton balls (fruits) [29]. Alpha—amylases are another group of enzymes of A. flavus, which hydrolyze starch to access endosperm tissue.
Aspergillus flavus secretes extracellular cutinases which are characterized as serine easterases [30]. These enzymes are known to facilitate nutrient capture by the fungus. However, they do not have a dual role in pathogenicity or virulence. The toxins are used by the organisms to withstand competition with other organisms in the environment. It may also have some role in host-pathogen interactions. Aspergillus fumigatus, a medically important fungus and known to contaminate mushroom cultures secretes a polyketide pigment known as melanin. A. fumigatus produces a protein toxin Asp f1 with multiple functions. It is an important allergen, antigen, has ribonuclease activity and is highly cytotoxic [31, 32]. A. fumigatus also produces Asp-hemolysin which induces hemolysis of erythrocytes [33]. Melanin, a complex polyketide pigment of A. fumigatus, is considered as a virulent factor known to play an important role in the pathogenesis of Invasive Aspergillosis (IA) in humans.
Other secondary metabolites of A. fumigatus include gliotoxin, helvolic acid, fumigacin fumagillin, fumigaclavine A-C, festuclavine, etc. [34]. Gliotoxin is known to be an immunosuppressive compound.
Aspergillus flavus isolates also secrete a diverse group of organic toxic compounds besides multifunctional proteins like allergens, antigens, cytotoxins and most importantly polyketides like aflatoxins. These include oxalic acid, kojic acid, flavacol, aspergillic acid, beta-nitro-propionic acid, endotoxin etc. Some of these compounds exhibit various biological activities which are harmful to the humans and animals. Hence contamination of A. flavus and its spores in environment and in the soil affecting various crops through aflatoxins need to be carefully handled by detection, diagnosis and management as they enter the food and feed chain at different stages. Other structurally related compounds to aflatoxin include AFLGM1, parasiticol and aflatoxicol.
Factors Influencing Aflatoxin Production/Conditions for Aflatoxin Production
Flavus has a unique feature of synthesizing a wide variety of structurally and functionally diverse compounds under different conditions of growth. These include culture media, nutrient supply and geographical conditions such as temp., humidity etc. These factors play a role in the synthesis of various polyketides. Few Aspergillus species in general produce aflatoxins at an optimum temperature of 25–32 °C, and moisture content a little above 12–16% with a relative humidity of 85%. A. flavus secretes aflatoxins between 12 and 42 °C and the optimum temp. is considered as 28–30 [35].
Aflatoxins; Genomics
The damaging effect of Aflatoxins on human and animal health, crop productivity and the economic impact on society prompted researchers to look into the biosynthesis of these compounds in Aspergilli. Major advancement in Aspergillus research is due to the availability of genome sequence information of important Aspergillus species. Today it is possible to have better understanding of the biology of important Aspergilli.
Aspergillus species have 8 chromosomes and the genome size of some of the important species varies by 30–40 megabases with 50% synteny between them. It harbors 140–500 unique genes. So far only 15,000 ORF are assigned with biological function [36]. Based on bioinformatic approach the transcriptome has been predicted. However, detailed experimental validation is necessary and efforts are on by research groups. Genomic information for most important Aspergillus species is now available in publication domain. Several ESTs of A. fumigatus (in Indian isolates) are deposited [37, 38].
The whole genome sequence of Aspergillus flavus has been updated at several websites and compiled at http://www.aspergillusgenome.org/. Several unique ESTs are generated from the EST bank. It is interesting to note the genome size of A. flavus and A. oryzae is slightly larger (37 Mb) than other Aspergilli (30–34 Mb). A. flavus and A. oryzae belong to Aspergillus section Flavi. Their genomic sequence suggests similarity of the species but they are morphologically distinct. Further, PCR based on ITS regions can identify them from each other. Gene clusters of secondary metabolites in A. flavus and A. oryazae are similar although species share most of the features, A oryzae does not secrete many of the polyketides and toxins produced by A. flavus. These two species share most of the genomic content including secondary metabolite gene clusters [39, 40], A oryzae does not produce many of the polyketides and toxins of A. flavus. In fact, it is highly used in food and fermentation industry. These major differences in these two Aspergillus species necessitate characterization and examination of uncharacterized genes involved in secondary metabolite regulation and particularly in the regulation of aflatoxin biosynthesis.
Based on online bioinformatic tools known as SMURF (Secondary Metabolite Unknown Regions Finder) genes associated with enzymes involved in secondary metabolic pathway in A. flavus are revealed [41]. These are polyketide synthases, PKS like synthases, nonribosomal peptide synthases, NRPS like synthases, PKS-NRPS enzymes, and phenyl transferases. These enzymes and the other cluster enzymes of Aspergillus species facilitate secretion of certain common classes of compounds such as polyketides, non-ribosomalpeptides, PKS-NRPS hybrids and indole alkaloids [42]. So far only handful of metabolic clusters of A. flavus is characterized, although 55gene clusters are predicted [43–46]. Molecular analysis of aflatoxin synthesis and secretion in A. flavus and A. parasiticus lead to identification of a 75 Kb Gene cluster [47–49]. Two important transcriptional regulators were located on this gene cluster. These are named as afl R and afl S. The gene cluster along with transcriptional regulator is arranged at the end of chromosome. Further, about 30 co-regulated downstream metabolic genes in the biosynthesis are identified. One of the important compounds in aflatoxin biosynthesis is characterized as sterigmatocystin. It is highly toxic and a carcinogen. This toxin is reported to be synthesized by species of Nidulantes and Versicolor also.
Most of the gene clusters of Aspergilli are cryptic under a variety of laboratory conditions with the exception to few toxins and a virulent factor [50]. Active research to understand the molecular and biochemical mechanisms for these toxins and virulent factors is in progress. Aflatoxins, ochratoxins and cyclopiazonic acid of Aspergillus species are of agricultural importance A global regulator in Aspergilli is identified and designated as LaeA which is a novel protein in secondary metabolism of Aspergilli [51, 52]. Two other proteins VeA and VelB of Velvet complex, a heterotrimeric nuclear complex (highly conserved in fungi) are hypothesized to activate the secondary metabolite clusters [53–56]. LaeA and VeA, are shown to regulate aflatoxin and few other toxins [57]. These are also known to play a role in sporulation and secondary metabolism in A. nidulans [58]. An important enzyme in polyketide biosynthetic pathway is polyketide synthase (pks). Polyketide synthases of Aspergilli are large multifunctional proteins and are of Type I with <1000 amino acids, coded by a single gene in A. flavus, other fungi and in bacteria. The pks enzyme of Aspergillus flavus and other Aspergillus speices consist of 5–9 domains on a single polypeptide chain and use iterative strategy (repetitive use). The domains are used repeatedly to extend the polyketide chain to build polyketides such as aflatoxins etc. General architecture of polyketide synthase from different Aspergillus species is presented in (Fig. 1).
Aflatoxin gene clusters include PksA (size of 6.6 kb) encoding for a polyketide synthase that catalyses the second step in which hexanoyl, tetra hydroxyl anthrone is converted to norsolorinic acid from hexanoate [59–61]. Norsolorinic acid is the first stable compound in the biosynthetic pathway and leads to synthesis of sterigmatocystin and aflatoxins.
The gene cluster is conserved in A. parasiticus, A. ochraceoroseus, A. nomius, A. pseudotamarii, A.nidulans, A. oryzae and A. sojae etc. [61]. Specificities in the conserved regions in these species may facilitate synthesis of different polyketide toxins. Some do not produce aflatoxins or any other toxin as in the case of A. oryzae and A. sojae. These two strains are used in the food industry. Several mutations and large deletions are observed in the gene clusters of these two species. Defects in aflatoxin biosynthetic genes and the transcriptional factors are reported in several of these strains. A Zn based transcriptional factor encoded by aflR is involved in the expression of the aflatoxin and sterigmatocystin biosynthetic genes. Over expressed and deleted aflR demonstrated up regulation of other biosynthetic genes and increased amounts of aflatoxin while deleted aflR resulted in absence of these products indicating its important role in the regulation and production of aflatoxins.
In view of variations in the polyketide biochemical pathways among medically and agriculturally important Aspergillus species, examination of phylogenetic relationship can lead to assignment of functionality to unexplored polyketide synthases and other enzymes with respect to secondary metabolites [62]. The general molecular architecture of pks enzyme is presented in (Fig. 2).
Molecular Variability in PKS Enzymes, Atoxigenecity and Aflatoxigenecity
It is well known all the isolates of A. flavus do not produce aflatoxins. This observation now has been studied with scientific evidence based on the understanding of biochemical pathways for aflatoxin synthesis [63–65]. High degree of molecular diversity of polyketide synthase and the gene cluster enzymes in aflatoxin biosynthetic pathway is being observed in A. flavus and A. parasiticus from different geographical regions by various groups [66]. These observations have led to identification of atoxigenicity in A. flavus isolates with defective polyketides biosynthetic mechanism [67, 68]. This was exploited for application to cotton field at Arizona for control of aflatoxins by nontoxigenic A. flavus isolates [69]. Several reports indicated the usefulness of such isolates [70, 71]. Currently several groups from several countries are working on identification of such strains with defective polyketide biosynthetic pathway for field application and commercialization. Valuable SNPs and deletions in PKs enzyme and the gene cluster enzymes are reported in association with aflatoxin production [68, 72]. However no single identity is associated with atoxigenicity so far. Two specific isolates well characterized for their atoxigenicity are currently reported. They are also available commercially. These include aflaguard and AF36 [73]. K49 and AFCHG2 are also promising isolates [74, 75]. Table 2 projects the molecular variability in PKS enzyme and atoxigenecity of Aspergillus flavus isolates along with other known SNP in Aspergilli
Table 2.
Aspergillus species | SNP/Amino acid substitution reported | Target Protein | Implications |
---|---|---|---|
Aspergillus fumigatus | G54, P216, F219, M220, G448 | Cyp51A (14α-demethylase) | Pan-azole Resistance |
Aspergillus flavus | A/G 591 | pksA (Polyketide synthase gene) | Biocontrol VCG isolate |
Aspergillus flavus,
Aspergillus parasiticus |
Multiple | cypX (Aflatoxin Biosynthetic pathway) | Biocontrol VCG isolate |
Aspergillus flavus | Multiple | mat1-2 (Matting type locus) | Biocontrol VCG isolate |
Toxicity and Potency of Aflatoxin
According to Ames et al. 1990 only dioxins (Td 50 = 6.7 × 10 mg/kg/d) significantly exceeds AFB1(TD50 = 9.3 × 10−4 mg/kg/d) in its potency. Using TD50 parameter aflatoxin B1 is 1000 times more potent as a carcinogen when compared to benzopyrene [6]. IARC has classified aflatoxins as a group1 carcinogen (IARC 7th annual report on carcinogen 1987) and more than 6000 ng is considered to cause acute toxicity.
Management of Aflatoxin
Economic Impact of Aflatoxins
Economic impact of losses due to aflatoxin contamination in crops and livestock have a direct significance. The cost of regulatory process designed to reduce risk to animal and human health have an economic impact.
Strategies for Removal of Aflatoxins
Removal of aflatoxin was attempted mainly by physical, chemical and biological methods. Decontamination of aflatoxins from animal feed includes use of binders such as Zeolite clays and alluminosilicates. Blending is a method based on mixing contaminated material with uncontaminated ones at a desired ratio based on the level of contamination. Ammoniation is a useful procedure which is successfully operative in many countries. Few chemical agents are effective at laboratory level and need validation for commercialization.
Decontamination of aflatoxins using the microbes such as Bacillus, Lactobacilli, and Pseudomonas etc. is one of the biological control strategies. Flavobacterium aurantiacum B-I84 was reported to remove aflatoxin from liquid media [76]. Simple adsorption method using dead microbes were also used for removal of aflatoxin. Enzymatic methods such as use of chitinase etc. are not economically viable.
Advances in Aspergillus research through genomic approaches resulted in better understanding of A. flavus molecular diversity in aflatoxin biosynthetic mechanism. Isolates with defective aflatoxin biosynthetic pathway are identified to have a biocontrol potential to eliminate toxigenic Aspergilli.
Conclusions
Environmental control of Aspergillus spores and conidia is necessary to avoid complicated allergies and infections due to fungal spores and particularly Aspergillus spores.
Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus are the two major species of producers of aflatoxins that contaminate a variety of economically important crops all over the world. Aflatoxins are a major challenge for a quality life. Novel and affordable methods are necessary for detection of agriculturally important Aspergilli in crops and agri-feed. A better understanding of host resistance, host pathogen interactions and an insight of the biological mechanisms of these fungi will provide novel methods of control and management of aflatoxins. Further it will also help exploration of new polyketides of human use.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) and the laboratory facilities provided by the Division of Plant Pathology, of Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi. Constant support by Dr. Rashmi Agarwal, Head, Division of Plant Pathology, IARI is gratefully acknowledged.
References
- 1.Usha Sarma P. Fascinating potential of aspergilli. Indian J Clin Biochem IJCB. 2010;25(4):331–334. doi: 10.1007/s12291-010-0079-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bhetariya PJ, Madan T, Basir SF, Varma A, Usha SP. Allergens/Antigens, toxins and polyketides of important Aspergillus species. Indian J Clin Biochem IJCB. 2011;26(2):104–119. doi: 10.1007/s12291-011-0131-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hussein HS, Brasel JM. Toxicity, metabolism, and impact of mycotoxins on humans and animals. Toxicology. 2001;167(2):101–134. doi: 10.1016/S0300-483X(01)00471-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hedayati MT, Pasqualotto AC, Warn PA, Bowyer P, Denning DW. Aspergillus flavus: human pathogen, allergen and mycotoxin producer. Microbiology. 2007;153(Pt 6):1677–1692. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2007/007641-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Doi AM, Patterson PE, Gallagher EP. Variability in aflatoxin B(1)-macromolecular binding and relationship to biotransformation enzyme expression in human prenatal and adult liver. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2002;181(1):48–59. doi: 10.1006/taap.2002.9399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Neal GE, Eaton DL, Judah DJ, Verma A. Metabolism and toxicity of aflatoxins M1 and B1 in human-derived in vitro systems. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1998;151(1):152–158. doi: 10.1006/taap.1998.8440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Richard JL. Some major mycotoxins and their mycotoxicoses–an overview. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007;119(1–2):3–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yang J, Li J, Jiang Y, Duan X, Qu H, Yang B, et al. Natural occurrence, analysis, and prevention of mycotoxins in fruits and their processed products. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2014;54(1):64–83. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2011.569860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Suarez-Bonnet E, Carvajal M, Mendez-Ramirez I, Castillo-Urueta P, Cortes-Eslava J, Gomez-Arroyo S, et al. Aflatoxin (B1, B2, G1, and G2) contamination in rice of Mexico and Spain, from local sources or imported. J Food Sci. 2013;78(11):T1822–T1829. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mukherjee K, Lakshminarasimham AV. Aflatoxin contamination of sorghum seeds during storage under controlled conditions. Zentralblatt fur Bakteriol Int J Med Microbiol. 1995;282(3):237–243. doi: 10.1016/S0934-8840(11)80123-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bhatnagar-Mathur P, Sunkara S, Bhatnagar-Panwar M, Waliyar F, Sharma KK. Biotechnological advances for combating Aspergillus flavus and aflatoxin contamination in crops. Plant Sci Int J Exp Plant Biol. 2015;234:119–132. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ozkan A, Bindak R, Erkmen O. Aflatoxin B(1) and aflatoxins in ground red chilli pepper after drying. Food Addit Contam Art B Surveill. 2015;8(3):227–233. doi: 10.1080/19393210.2015.1063014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Karaaslan M, Arslangray Y. Aflatoxins B1, B2, G1, and G2 contamination in ground red peppers commercialized in Sanliurfa, Turkey. Environ Monit Assess. 2015;187(4):184. doi: 10.1007/s10661-015-4402-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yogendrarajah P, Jacxsens L, Lachat C, Walpita CN, Kolsteren P, De Saeger S, et al. Public health risk associated with the co-occurrence of mycotoxins in spices consumed in Sri Lanka. Food Chem Toxicol Int J Publ Br Ind Biol Res Assoc. 2014;74:240–248. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2014.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Do KH, An TJ, Oh SK, Moon Y. Nation-based occurrence and endogenous biological reduction of mycotoxins in medicinal herbs and spices. Toxins. 2015;7(10):4111–4130. doi: 10.3390/toxins7104111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gundinc U, Filazi A. Detection of aflatoxin M1 concentrations in UHT milk consumed in Turkey markets by ELISA. Pak J Biol Sci PJBS. 2009;12(8):653–656. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2009.653.656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Armorini S, Altafini A, Zaghini A, Roncada P. Occurrence of aflatoxin M1 in conventional and organic milk offered for sale in Italy. Mycotoxin Res. 2016;32(4):237–246. doi: 10.1007/s12550-016-0256-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Masoero F, Gallo A, Moschini M, Piva G, Diaz D. Carryover of aflatoxin from feed to milk in dairy cows with low or high somatic cell counts. Anim Int J Anim Biosci. 2007;1(9):1344–1350. doi: 10.1017/S1751731107000663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rodrigues I, Handl J, Binder EM. Mycotoxin occurrence in commodities, feeds and feed ingredients sourced in the Middle East and Africa. Food Addit Contam Part B Surveill. 2011;4(3):168–179. doi: 10.1080/19393210.2011.589034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hussain Z, Khan MZ, Khan A, Javed I, Saleemi MK, Mahmood S, et al. Residues of aflatoxin B1 in broiler meat: effect of age and dietary aflatoxin B1 levels. Food Chem Toxicol Int J Publ Br Ind Biol Res Assoc. 2010;48(12):3304–3307. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2010.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Micco C, Miraglia M, Onori R, Brera C, Mantovani A, Ioppolo A, et al. Long-term administration of low doses of mycotoxins to poultry. 1. Residues of aflatoxin B1 and its metabolites in broilers and laying hens. Food Addit Contam. 1988;5(3):303–308. doi: 10.1080/02652038809373708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Malik A, Ali S, Shahid M, Bhargava R. Occupational exposure to Aspergillus and aflatoxins among food-grain workers in India. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2014;20(3):189–193. doi: 10.1179/2049396714Y.0000000055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Njumbe Ediage E, Diana Di Mavungu J, Song S, Sioen I, De Saeger S. Multimycotoxin analysis in urines to assess infant exposure: a case study in Cameroon. Environ Int. 2013;57–58:50–59. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2013.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hamid AS, Tesfamariam IG, Zhang Y, Zhang ZG. Aflatoxin B1-induced hepatocellular carcinoma in developing countries: Geographical distribution, mechanism of action and prevention. Oncol Lett. 2013;5(4):1087–1092. doi: 10.3892/ol.2013.1169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Qureshi H, Hamid SS, Ali SS, Anwar J, Siddiqui AA, Khan NA. Cytotoxic effects of aflatoxin B1 on human brain microvascular endothelial cells of the blood-brain barrier. Med Mycol. 2015;53(4):409–416. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myv010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Dohnal V, Wu Q, Kuca K. Metabolism of aflatoxins: key enzymes and interindividual as well as interspecies differences. Arch Toxicol. 2014;88(9):1635–1644. doi: 10.1007/s00204-014-1312-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hanzi M, Shimizu M, Hearn VM, Monod M. A study of the alkaline proteases secreted by different Aspergillus species. Mycoses. 1993;36(11–12):351–356. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.1993.tb00722.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mellon JE, Cotty PJ. Expression of elastinolytic activity among isolates in Aspergillus section flavi. Mycopathologia. 1995;131(2):115–120. doi: 10.1007/BF01102889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Shieh MT, Brown RL, Whitehead MP, Cary JW, Cotty PJ, Cleveland TE, et al. Molecular genetic evidence for the involvement of a specific polygalacturonase, P2c, in the invasion and spread of Aspergillus flavus in cotton bolls. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63(9):3548–3552. doi: 10.1128/aem.63.9.3548-3552.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.St Leger RJ, Joshi L, Roberts DW. Adaptation of proteases and carbohydrates of saprophytic, phytopathogenic and entomopathogenic fungi to the requirements of their ecological niches. Microbiology. 1997;143(Pt 6):1983–1992. doi: 10.1099/00221287-143-6-1983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sarma PV, Purkayastha S, Madan T, Sarma PU. Expression of an epitopic region of AspfI, an allergen/antigen/cytotoxin of Aspergillus fumigatus. Immunol Lett. 1999;70(3):151–155. doi: 10.1016/S0165-2478(99)00140-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Madan T, Arora N, Sarma PU. Ribonuclease activity dependent cytotoxicity of Asp fl, a major allergen of A. fumigatus. Mol Cell Biochem. 1997;175(1–2):21–27. doi: 10.1023/A:1006822906343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wartenberg D, Lapp K, Jacobsen ID, Dahse HM, Kniemeyer O, Heinekamp T, et al. Secretome analysis of Aspergillus fumigatus reveals Asp-hemolysin as a major secreted protein. Int J Med Microbiol IJMM. 2011;301(7):602–611. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2011.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tamiya H, Ochiai E, Kikuchi K, Yahiro M, Toyotome T, Watanabe A, et al. Secondary metabolite profiles and antifungal drug susceptibility of Aspergillus fumigatus and closely related species, Aspergillus lentulus, Aspergillus udagawae, and Aspergillus viridinutans. J Infect Chemother Off J Jpn Soc Chemother. 2015;21(5):385–391. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2015.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Peromingo B, Rodriguez A, Bernaldez V, Delgado J, Rodriguez M. Effect of temperature and water activity on growth and aflatoxin production by Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus on cured meat model systems. Meat Sci. 2016;122:76–83. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.07.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Archer DB, Dyer PS. From genomics to post-genomics in Aspergillus. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2004;7(5):499–504. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2004.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Shankar J, Nigam S, Saxena S, Madan T, Sarma PU. Identification and assignment of function to the genes of Aspergillus fumigatus expressed at 37 degrees C. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2004;51(4):428–432. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2004.tb00390.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Shankar J, Madan T, Basir SF, Sarma PU. Identification and characterization of polyubiquitin gene from cDNA library of aspergillus fumigatus. Indian J Clin Biochem IJCB. 2005;20(1):208–212. doi: 10.1007/BF02893072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ehrlich KC, Mack BM. Comparison of expression of secondary metabolite biosynthesis cluster genes in Aspergillus flavus A. parasiticus and A. oryzae. Toxins. 2014;6(6):1916–1928. doi: 10.3390/toxins6061916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Juvvadi PR, Seshime Y, Kitamoto K. Genomics reveals traces of fungal phenylpropanoid-flavonoid metabolic pathway in the f ilamentous fungus Aspergillus oryzae. J Microbiol. 2005;43(6):475–486. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Khaldi N, Collemare J, Lebrun MH, Wolfe KH. Evidence for horizontal transfer of a secondary metabolite gene cluster between fungi. Genome Biol. 2008;9(1):R18. doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-1-r18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Chiang YM, Oakley BR, Keller NP, Wang CC. Unraveling polyketide synthesis in members of the genus Aspergillus. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;86(6):1719–1736. doi: 10.1007/s00253-010-2525-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lin HC, Chooi YH, Dhingra S, Xu W, Calvo AM, Tang Y. The fumagillin biosynthetic gene cluster in Aspergillus fumigatus encodes a cryptic terpene cyclase involved in the formation of beta-trans-bergamotene. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135(12):4616–4619. doi: 10.1021/ja312503y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Duran RM, Gregersen S, Smith TD, Bhetariya PJ, Cary JW, Harris-Coward PY, et al. The role of Aspergillus flavus veA in the production of extracellular proteins during growth on starch substrates. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98(11):5081–5094. doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-5598-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Cary JW, Han Z, Yin Y, Lohmar JM, Shantappa S, Harris-Coward PY, et al. Transcriptome analysis of Aspergillus flavus reveals veA-dependent regulation of secondary metabolite gene clusters, including the novel aflavarin cluster. Eukaryot Cell. 2015;14(10):983–997. doi: 10.1128/EC.00092-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Duran RM, Cary JW, Calvo AM. Production of cyclopiazonic acid, aflatrem, and aflatoxin by Aspergillus flavus is regulated by veA, a gene necessary for sclerotial formation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;73(5):1158–1168. doi: 10.1007/s00253-006-0581-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Bhatnagar D, Ehrlich KC, Cleveland TE. Molecular genetic analysis and regulation of aflatoxin biosynthesis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003;61(2):83–93. doi: 10.1007/s00253-002-1199-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Yu J, Bhatnagar D, Ehrlich KC. Aflatoxin biosynthesis. Revista iberoam de Micol. 2002;19(4):191–200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Yu J, Chang PK, Ehrlich KC, Cary JW, Bhatnagar D, Cleveland TE, et al. Clustered pathway genes in aflatoxin biosynthesis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70(3):1253–1262. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.3.1253-1262.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Keller NP, Turner G, Bennett JW. Fungal secondary metabolism - from biochemistry to genomics. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005;3(12):937–947. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kale SP, Milde L, Trapp MK, Frisvad JC, Keller NP, Bok JW. Requirement of LaeA for secondary metabolism and sclerotial production in Aspergillus flavus. Fungal Genet Biol FG B. 2008;45(10):1422–1429. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2008.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Perrin RM, Fedorova ND, Bok JW, Cramer RA, Wortman JR, Kim HS, et al. Transcriptional regulation of chemical diversity in Aspergillus fumigatus by LaeA. PLoS Pathog. 2007;3(4):e50. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Baidya S, Duran RM, Lohmar JM, Harris-Coward PY, Cary JW, Hong SY, et al. VeA is associated with the response to oxidative stress in the aflatoxin producer Aspergillus flavus. Eukaryot Cell. 2014;13(8):1095–1103. doi: 10.1128/EC.00099-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Palmer JM, Theisen JM, Duran RM, Grayburn WS, Calvo AM, Keller NP. Secondary metabolism and development is mediated by LlmF control of VeA subcellular localization in Aspergillus nidulans. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(1):e1003193. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Chang PK, Scharfenstein LL, Li P, Ehrlich KC. Aspergillus flavus VelB acts distinctly from VeA in conidiation and may coordinate with FluG to modulate sclerotial production. Fungal Genet Biol FG B. 2013;58–59:71–79. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2013.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Calvo AM, Bok J, Brooks W, Keller NP. veA is required for toxin and sclerotial production in Aspergillus parasiticus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70(8):4733–4739. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.8.4733-4739.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Amaike S, Keller NP. Distinct roles for VeA and LaeA in development and pathogenesis of Aspergillus flavus. Eukaryot Cell. 2009;8(7):1051–1060. doi: 10.1128/EC.00088-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Bayram O, Krappmann S, Ni M, Bok JW, Helmstaedt K, Valerius O, et al. VelB/VeA/LaeA complex coordinates light signal with fungal development and secondary metabolism. Science. 2008;320(5882):1504–1506. doi: 10.1126/science.1155888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Feng GH, Leonard TJ. Characterization of the polyketide synthase gene (pksL1) required for aflatoxin biosynthesis in Aspergillus parasiticus. J Bacteriol. 1995;177(21):6246–6254. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.21.6246-6254.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Mahanti N, Bhatnagar D, Cary JW, Joubran J, Linz JE. Structure and function of fas-1A, a gene encoding a putative fatty acid synthetase directly involved in aflatoxin biosynthesis in Aspergillus parasiticus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996;62(1):191–195. doi: 10.1128/aem.62.1.191-195.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Rokas A, Payne G, Fedorova ND, Baker SE, Machida M, Yu J, et al. What can comparative genomics tell us about species concepts in the genus Aspergillus? Stud Mycol. 2007;59:11–17. doi: 10.3114/sim.2007.59.02. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Bhetariya PJ, Prajapati M, Bhaduri A, Mandal RS, Varma A, Madan T, et al. Phylogenetic and Structural Analysis of Polyketide Synthases in Aspergilli. Evol Bioinform Online. 2016;12:109–119. doi: 10.4137/EBO.S32694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Yin Y, Lou T, Yan L, Michailides TJ, Ma Z. Molecular characterization of toxigenic and atoxigenic Aspergillus flavus isolates, collected from peanut fields in China. J Appl Microbiol. 2009;107(6):1857–1865. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04356.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Ehrlich KC, Montalbano BG, Cotty PJ. Analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms in three genes shows evidence for genetic isolation of certain Aspergillus flavus vegetative compatibility groups. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2007;268(2):231–236. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00588.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Criseo G, Bagnara A, Bisignano G. Differentiation of aflatoxin-producing and non-producing strains of Aspergillus flavus group. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2001;33(4):291–295. doi: 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2001.00998.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Atoui A, Dao HP, Mathieu F, Lebrihi A. Amplification and diversity analysis of ketosynthase domains of putative polyketide synthase genes in Aspergillus ochraceus and Aspergillus carbonarius producers of ochratoxin A. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2006;50(6):488–493. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.200500165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Chang PK, Horn BW, Dorner JW. Sequence breakpoints in the aflatoxin biosynthesis gene cluster and flanking regions in nonaflatoxigenic Aspergillus flavus isolates. Fungal Genet Biol FG B. 2005;42(11):914–923. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2005.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Ehrlich KC, Cotty PJ. An isolate of Aspergillus flavus used to reduce aflatoxin contamination in cottonseed has a defective polyketide synthase gene. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004;65(4):473–478. doi: 10.1007/s00253-004-1670-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Atehnkeng J, Ojiambo PS, Ikotun T, Sikora RA, Cotty PJ, Bandyopadhyay R. Evaluation of atoxigenic isolates of Aspergillus flavus as potential biocontrol agents for aflatoxin in maize. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2008;25(10):1264–1271. doi: 10.1080/02652030802112635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Cotty PJ, Bhatnagar D. Variability among atoxigenic Aspergillus flavus strains in ability to prevent aflatoxin contamination and production of aflatoxin biosynthetic pathway enzymes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994;60(7):2248–2251. doi: 10.1128/aem.60.7.2248-2251.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Grubisha LC, Cotty PJ. Genetic analysis of the aspergillus flavus vegetative compatibility group to which a biological control agent that limits aflatoxin contamination in U.S. crops belongs. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81(17):5889–5899. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00738-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Chang PK, Abbas HK, Weaver MA, Ehrlich KC, Scharfenstein LL, Cotty PJ. Identification of genetic defects in the atoxigenic biocontrol strain Aspergillus flavus K49 reveals the presence of a competitive recombinant group in field populations. Int J Food Microbiol. 2012;154(3):192–196. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Ortega-Beltran A, Grubisha LC, Callicott KA, Cotty PJ. The vegetative compatibility group to which the US biocontrol agent Aspergillus flavus AF36 belongs is also endemic to Mexico. J Appl Microbiol. 2016;120(4):986–998. doi: 10.1111/jam.13047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.King ED, Bassi AB, Jr, Ross DC, Druebbisch B. An industry perspective on the use of “atoxigenic” strains of Aspergillus flavus as biological control agents and the significance of cyclopiazonic acid. Toxin Rev. 2011;30(2–3):33–41. doi: 10.3109/15569543.2011.588818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Alaniz Zanon MS, Barros GG, Chulze SN. Non-aflatoxigenic Aspergillus flavus as potential biocontrol agents to reduce aflatoxin contamination in peanuts harvested in Northern Argentina. Int J Food Microbiol. 2016;231:63–68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.D’Souza DH, Brackett RE. Aflatoxin B1 degradation by flavobacterium aurantiacum in the presence of reducing conditions and seryl and sulfhydryl group inhibitors. J Food Prot. 2001;64(2):268–271. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-64.2.268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]