Knowledge into Practice.
As the Canadian population ages, the prevalence of dementia is increasing exponentially and with it the demands placed on individuals, society and health care providers.
Pharmacists can take on a larger role in treating and supporting individuals with dementia, in particular educating patients and caregivers about the condition and its progression, becoming familiar with screening tools that can be used in pharmacy practice to assess cognitive function and helping to manage medications for patients in different stages of dementia.
Mise En Pratique Des Connaissances.
À mesure que la population canadienne vieillit, la prévalence de la démence augmente de façon exponentielle et les demandes auxquelles doivent répondre les individus, la société et les fournisseurs de soins de santé s’accroissent en conséquence.
Les pharmaciens peuvent jouer un plus grand rôle dans le traitement et le soutien des personnes atteintes de démence, en particulier en informant les patients et les aidants sur la maladie et sa progression, en se familiarisant avec les outils de dépistage qui peuvent être utilisés dans la pratique de la pharmacie pour évaluer la fonction cognitive, et en gérant les médicaments des patients à différents stades de la démence.
“Of all the things I’ve lost, I miss my mind the most.”
—Mark Twain
Introduction
Dementia is a devastating disease that places a significant physical, emotional and financial burden on patients, their caregivers and society. About 564,000 Canadians have dementia today, and by 2031, the figure is projected to increase to 937,000.1 Its management is particularly costly: the combined health care system and out-of-pocket caregiver costs of dementia in Canada are estimated to be $10.4 billion in 2016, a figure expected to double by 2031.1
Pharmacists are trusted health care providers who play a vital role in patient education, medication counselling and drug therapy management and monitoring—a broad spectrum of professional services that benefit both patients with dementia and their caregivers. This article is part of a series2 that aims to identify roles, strategies and resources pharmacists can use and apply in daily clinical practice when caring for patients with dementia. More specifically, this therapeutic update focuses on current approaches used in the diagnosis of dementia, the assessment of cognitive function and the pharmacotherapy of dementia. To prepare this article, the authors reviewed literature on dementia, its diagnosis and treatment and assessment of cognitive function. The studies deemed most relevant to a pharmacist’s clinical practice were included in this article.
What is dementia?
Dementia refers to a clinical syndrome characterized by progressive cognitive decline that interferes with the ability to function independently.3,4 Symptoms of dementia are gradual, persistent and progressive. Individuals suffering from dementia experience changes in cognition, function and behaviour. The clinical presentation of dementia varies greatly among individuals, and the cognitive deficits it causes can present as memory loss, communication and language impairments, agnosia (inability to recognize objects), apraxia (inability to perform previously learned tasks) and impaired executive function (reasoning, judgement and planning). Cognitive impairment stems from injury to the cerebral cortex caused by synaptic failure, inflammation and change in cerebral metabolism.5
Patients with mild deficits who do not meet the criteria for dementia are considered to have mild cognitive impairment (MCI), an objective cognitive impairment with preserved function.5 People with MCI may experience difficulties with memory, language, thinking or judgement that are greater than the cognitive changes expected with normal aging.6 While MCI can be assessed objectively with cognitive tests, the impairments are considered to be insufficient to interfere with an individual’s daily life and independence.6 As Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive condition, in its early stages, individuals may present with MCI. Moreover, individuals with MCI are at higher risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias than those without MCI.7-10 The reported annual conversion rate ranges from 1.6% to 28%, depending on definitions and operational criteria and settings within these definitions.7,11-14 A meta-analysis of cohort studies indicated that in specialist settings, a cumulative proportion of 39.2% of individuals with MCI deteriorated to dementia, but in population studies, 21.9% deteriorated.14 A significant number of individuals with MCI remain cognitively unchanged or return to normal cognition status.10,14,15
Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia are complications of dementia. The most common symptoms (agitation, apathy, aggression, psychosis, hallucinations and delusions) cause considerable distress and may pose a safety risk for patients and their caregivers. Unfortunately, many behavioural and psychological symptoms, such as wandering, hoarding, inappropriate behaviours (e.g., sexual disinhibition, eating inappropriate objects), repetitive behaviour and restlessness, do not respond well to pharmacotherapy. In the most recent Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V), the term neurocognitive disorder was introduced and replaced the term dementia,16 which was referred to in the DSM-IV as “dementia, delirium, amnestic and other cognitive disorders.”17 The 6 cognitive domains affected by dementia are learning and memory, language, complex attention, executive function, perceptual-motor and social cognition. The neurocognitive disorder is classified as mild or major, depending on the severity of symptoms.16 More precisely, patients with mild neurocognitive disorder have modest cognitive decline from previous levels of performance in 1 domain or more. In contrast, major neurocognitive disorder is diagnosed when deficits in 1 domain or more interfere with independence in everyday activities.16
Subtypes of dementia
Dementia is an umbrella term used to describe a clinical syndrome of progressive cognitive decline, but its subtypes are classified according to the cause of dementia. The 4 common types of dementia—AD, vascular dementia, Lewy body dementia and frontotemporal dementia—are described below and summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
Dementia subtype | Clinical presentation* |
---|---|
Alzheimer’s disease | • Insidious onset and slow progressive decline • Short-term memory impairment in early stage; deficit on 3-word or 5-word recall; executive function impairment in later stages |
Vascular dementia | • Sudden or gradual onset • Usually correlated with cerebrovascular disease (stroke, lacunar infarcts) and atherosclerotic comorbidities (diabetes, hypertension, coronary heart disease) • Mild memory impairment in early stage • Possible gait difficulties and falls (depending on the extent of the stroke) |
Lewy body dementia | • Fluctuating cognition associated with parkinsonism • Poor executive function and visual hallucinations in early stage; deficits on tests designed to examine visual perception (pentagons, cube, trails, clock face) |
Frontotemporal dementia | • More prominent personality changes (disinhibition) and behavioural disturbances (apathy, aggression, agitation with less memory impairment in early stage) |
Clinical presentation summaries from Muangpaisan W. Clinical differences among 4 common dementia syndromes. Geriatr Aging 2007;10(425):9.
Alzheimer’s disease
AD is the most common neurodegenerative disease responsible for dementia, comprising 60% to 80% of cases. It is believed to derive from the accumulation of beta-amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles, first in the brain areas of the entorhinal cortex and the hippocampus, which induces neuronal injury and, subsequently, neuronal death. The resulting decrease in cholinergic neurotransmission gives rise to loss of memory and cognition. More precisely, neurotransmitter abnormalities include reduced activity of choline acetyltransferase (involved in the synthesis of acetylcholine) and a reduced number of cholinergic neurons. As it spreads to other parts of the brain, neurons progressively die in affected regions, thereby worsening the symptoms of AD. Genetics is a contributing factor to the development of AD. While late-onset AD is most commonly diagnosed in patients after the age of 60, early-onset AD (diagnosed in individuals age 30 to 60) is associated with autosomal dominant mutations in 3 genes: PSEN1, APP and PSEN2.19 Apolipoprotein E has been identified as a genetic risk factor in late-onset AD.19
While the onset of AD is usually undetectable, short-term memory loss is most commonly the first sign. Gradual deficits in cognitive function occur progressively over time, affecting multiple cognitive domains. For treatment and assessment, AD symptoms are classified as cognitive and noncognitive. While the former are usually present throughout the illness, the latter are less predictable in the course of the disorder. More specifically, cognitive symptoms include memory loss (poor recall, losing items), aphasia, agnosia, apraxia, disorientation (impaired perception of time, unable to recognize familiar people) and impaired visuospatial function and executive function. Patients with AD may also present noncognitive symptoms such as depression, psychotic symptoms (hallucinations, delusions) and behavioural symptoms (such as physical and verbal aggression, motor hyperactivity, uncooperativeness, wandering, repetitive mannerisms and activities and combativeness). AD is usually characterized by early problems in memory and visuospatial abilities (e.g., becoming lost in a familiar environment). Personality changes and behavioural difficulties may develop as the disease progresses. Hallucinations may occur in moderate to severe dementia. At the end stage, patients may present with near mutism, lacking the ability to sit up, hold up their head or track objects with their eyes.
Vascular dementia
Vascular dementia is the second most prevalent form of dementia (20%).20 Also called multi-infarct dementia, vascular dementia results from neuronal deprivation of oxygen caused by conditions that either block or reduce blood flow to the brain. Stroke is the most common cause of vascular dementia. Its symptoms can vary widely, depending on the affected regions of the brain and the severity of the blood vessel damage. After a major stroke, the most prominent symptoms include confusion, disorientation, difficulty with speaking, understanding speech and vision loss. Memory may not be affected in vascular dementia, but a sudden change in executive function (e.g., thinking, reasoning) might surface after a stroke. In contrast, multiple small strokes lead to a more gradual decline in executive function as damage accumulates. Mixed dementia refers to the co-existence of AD and vascular dementia.
Lewy body dementia
Lewy body dementia (LBD) is a form of dementia caused by abnormal deposits of alpha-synuclein protein (Lewy bodies) inside neurons. It accounts for 5% to 15% of all dementias.21 The most distinctive features of LBD include fluctuating cognitive impairment with variations in attention and alertness, recurrent complex visual hallucinations and spontaneous parkinsonism.21,22 The prevalence of fluctuating mental status in LBD is between 30% and 89%. In contrast to AD, caregivers of patients with LBD may observe lethargy, daytime somnolence, sustained periods of staring into space (episodes of blank staring with disengagement from the environment), periods of improved memory, episodes of disorganized speech and periods of decreased attention.22 Furthermore, rigidity, bradykinesia and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep disorders are more commonly observed in early stages of LBD. Although memory loss tends to be a complaint in early AD, it is more frequently observed in advanced LBD.21 More than 80% of individuals with LBD develop parkinsonism. To differentiate LBD from Parkinson’s disease dementia (PDD), the temporal course of the disease and the clinical presentation are considered: with LBD, the onset of dementia occurs up to 12 months before parkinsonism, but PDD patients demonstrate parkinsonian symptoms at the time of dementia diagnosis. Moreover, tremor is more commonly observed in PDD, while postural instability and gait difficulty are more frequent extrapyramidal symptoms associated with LBD.18
Frontotemporal dementia
Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a general term used to describe disorders, such as Pick’s disease, that affect the frontal and temporal lobes of the brain.23 FTD tends to occur at a younger age (40-75 years) than does AD. Personality changes and behavioural disturbances are key features of FTD and occur early in the disease. In contrast to AD, visuospatial function is usually not affected.
Clinical evaluation
In clinical practice, the diagnosis of dementia and its subtype is based on a detailed patient history, physical examination, cognitive assessment and laboratory testing. Neuroimaging tools, such as magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography scans, establish the diagnosis. Since cognitive impairment is usually multifactorial, a detailed history is essential. The clinician gathers information from the patient and collateral history from a reliable informant about the history of present illness (details, timing and progression of complaints), functional status (basic activities of daily living), safety (driving, finances, ability to use appliances), medical history (cardiovascular disease, neurologic disease, history of head trauma or concussions) and social history (current living arrangement, support network). Risk factors for dementia include a positive family history, repetitive head trauma, cardiometabolic factors (diabetes, hypertension, obesity and dyslipidemia), atrial fibrillation, sleep apnea and previous depression.5,24-27
A medication review and review of systems should be part of the evaluation. Several conditions may contribute to cognitive impairment, including adverse drug effects, depression, thyroid disease, vitamin B12 deficiency, hypercalcemia, sleep apnea, atrial fibrillation, subdural hematoma and delirium. The latter can be distinguished from dementia by their acute onset, fluctuating course and deficits in attention rather than memory. Older patients are particularly vulnerable to the sedating effects of medications such as benzodiazepines, sedative hypnotics, anticholinergics, opioid analgesics and antipsychotics. Since medications may be reversible causes of cognitive impairment, pharmacists should evaluate the benefits of these medications vs their possible contribution to cognitive impairment for each patient with dementia symptoms.
Assessment scales for primary care
Many types of assessment scales have been developed for dementia in the domains of cognition, function, behaviour, quality of life, depression, caregiver burden and severity of illness.3 Examples of cognitive tests and the types of symptoms they could be used to assess are presented in Table 2. These scales can use reports from patients, their caregivers or observers. In primary care, brief cognitive screening instruments are commonly used to detect cognitive impairment, as such impairment is the core factor in dementia diagnosis.16 In Canada, the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE),28 Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA),29 Clock Drawing Test30 and delayed word recall are the most frequently used tools by family physicians and psychogeriatric clinicians.31,32 These instruments, which can be administered quickly by trained personnel, are used consecutively, because dementia is multidimensional and use of a single scale is insufficient to make a diagnosis. A detailed comparison of tools for use in primary care is presented in Table 3.
Table 2.
Symptoms | Examples within cognitive tests |
---|---|
Immediate memory Recent memory (including free recall, cued recall and recognition memory) Very long-term memory (semantic, autobiographical) |
3-word recall (MMSE) 5-word recall (MoCA) |
Expressive language (naming, word finding, fluency) Grammar and syntax Receptive language (comprehension) |
Recognizing pen or watch (MMSE) Animals (MoCA) |
Sustained attention Selective attention Divided attention |
Serial 7s, numbers backward |
Planning Decision making Working memory (ability to hold information briefly and to manipulate it) Feedback/error correction Overriding habits Mental flexibility (ability to shift between 2 concepts, tasks or response rules) |
Mini trials (MoCA) |
Visual perception Visuoconstructional Perceptual-motor (integrating perception with purposeful movement) Praxis (integrity of learning movements, such as ability to imitate gestures) Gnosis (perceptual integrity of awareness and recognition) |
Pentagons, cube, trails, clock face Blowing candle, waving goodbye |
MMSE = Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE); MoCA = Montreal Cognitive Assessment.
Table 3.
Tools | Sensitivity | Specificity | Total scores | Time to administer | Access link | Areas of assessment | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)4,28,33 | 0.87 | 0.82 | 30 | 5-10 min | https://www.mountsinai.on.ca/care/psych/on-call-resources/on-call-resources/mmse.pdf | Orientation, registration, recall, attention and calculation, language | Educational level strongly affects the score; insensitive to delirium |
Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS)4,34,35 | 0.81/0.91 | 0.85/0.75 | 10 | 5 min | www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2560932/pdf/occpaper00113-0035.pdf | Orientation, attention, memory, general knowledge | |
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)4,29 | 1 | 0.87 | 30 | 10-15 min | www.mocatest.org/ | Memory, attention and concentration, executive functions, language, visuoconstructional skills, conceptual thinking, calculations and orientation | |
Mini-Cog4,36 | 0.99 | 0.93 | 5 | 3 min | www.alz.org/documents_custom/minicog.pdf | Recall of memory, clock drawing | Often accompanied with a clock-drawing test; best choice for low-income and low-education groups |
Clock-Drawing Test (CDT)4,37 | 0.86 | 0.96 | 6 | 3 min | https://www.healthcare.uiowa.edu/igec/tools/cognitive/clockDrawing.pdf | Clock drawing | |
General Practitioner Assessment of Cognition (GPCOG)4,38 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 9 | 6 min | www.alz.org/documents_custom/gpcog(english).pdf | Recall, time orientation, clock drawing, information | |
7-minute screen (7MS)39 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 6-10 min | Memory, orientation, verbal frequency, visuoconstruction | Insensitive to age, sex, education | ||
Memory Impairment Screen (MIS)4,40 | 0.86 | 0.91 | 8 | 5 min | www.alz.org/documents_custom/mis.pdf | Recall | Alternative to GPCOG, clock-drawing test, Mini-Cog or AMTS |
The MMSE is the most commonly used cognitive screening tool worldwide and remains the most thoroughly studied instrument to date.28 The MMSE requires 5 to 10 minutes to administer, is available in different languages and requires minimal training by a clinical assessor. It provides a global assessment of various cognitive domains: orientation to time and place, registration of words, calculation, attention, concentration, recall of words, language and visual construction. The MMSE has high sensitivity and specificity, and a score of 23 or lower indicates cognitive impairment.28 However, the subject’s educational level affects the score strongly, so interpretation must consider this factor.33 The test is copyrighted by Psychological Assessment Resources, which does not grant open permission to reproduce the MMSE in its entirety, diminishing its value as a practice tool.
The Abbreviated Mental Test Score is a 10-point scale that assesses patients’ orientation, attention, memory and general knowledge.34 The test takes only 5 minutes to administer; a score from 0 to 3 indicates severe cognitive impairment, 4 to 6 indicates moderate impairment, and greater than 6 indicates normal cognitive function.35
The MoCA was created as a rapid screening instrument for MCI.29 It requires 10 to 15 minutes to complete and evaluates cognitive domains such as attention and concentration, executive functions, memory, language, visuoconstructional skills, conceptual thinking, calculations and orientation. A score ≤25 out of 30 is considered to be indicative of significant cognitive impairment.29 The MoCA has been shown to be more sensitive than the MMSE in differentiating between mild dementia and normal cognition.24
The Mini-Cog is a short test that is not influenced by income or education levels and takes only 3 minutes to complete.36 It starts with a 3-item word recall test, followed by a clock drawing test.
The Clock Drawing Test typically requires patients to draw a clock face with numbers and hands indicating a prespecified time. The test was designed as a quick screen for dementia by focusing on the cognitive domains of executive functioning and visuoconstruction.4,24 Based on the Shulman scoring system, a cutoff score of 3 generates the preferred sensitivity (0.86) and specificity (0.96).37 This scale may be used on its own or with other screening tools to assess patients.
The General Practitioner assessment of Cognition (GPCOG) is a brief dementia screening scale designed for use in primary care.38 It consists of a patient examination and informant interview and takes about 6 minutes. A score of 10 or lower indicates cognitive impairment.
As its name implies, the 7-minute screen takes about 7 minutes to administer and consists of 4 tests that assess memory, verbal frequency, visuospatial skills and visuoconstruction and orientation.39 The test demonstrates a competitive sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing between patients with dementia and normal controls, and its accuracy is not affected by age, sex or educational level.
The Memory Impairment Screen is a 4-item scale designed to detect various types of dementia in different settings.40 The scale has shown good sensitivity and specificity in classifying dementia. A score of 5 or below indicates dementia.
Pharmacists should become familiar with these assessment tools so they can use them quickly and proficiently in patient care. The MMSE and the MoCA can be used to screen for cognitive impairment in patients with memory complaints. If cognitive impairment is suspected, patients can then be referred to their physicians for in-depth assessment. These tools can also be used to monitor the efficacy of pharmacological treatment by comparing scores before and after initiation of therapy. The Mini-Cog, a 3-minute screening test involving clock drawing and 3-word recall, can be used as part of patient counselling to detect cognitive impairments in older adults.
Treatment for dementia
Prevention
To date, studies evaluating the role of statins and omega-3 fatty acids in preventing AD have provided conflicting results.41,42 Randomized controlled trials have not supported the use of ginkgo biloba to reduce the risk of developing AD in elderly patients with or without MCI.43,44 Since oxidative stress is considered a factor in neurodegeneration and neuronal death in AD, oxidants such as selenium and vitamin E have been investigated, but they did not demonstrate a preventive role in AD.45
Nonpharmacological strategies
Although various cognitive training and exercise programs have been proposed to improve or preserve cognition and function in patients with mild to moderate dementia, multiple studies have not provided sufficient evidence to support any particular beneficial intervention.46-49 However, while exercise does not improve cognition, neuropsychiatric symptoms or depression, it may improve the ability to perform activities of daily living in individuals with dementia.48
Pharmacological options
Cholinesterase inhibitors prevent breakdown of acetylcholine in the brain, a key neurotransmitter involved in learning and memory, thus increasing the level of acetylcholine in brains of individuals with dementia. Donepezil (Aricept), galantamine (Reminyl) and rivastigmine (Exelon) are cholinesterase inhibitors indicated for treatment of mild to moderate AD in Canada (Table 4). Donepezil may also be used in severe forms of AD, and rivastigmine is indicated for treatment of patients with PDD and mild to moderate AD.
Table 4.
Drug | Strength | Dosing | Dosing in renal impairment | Dosing in hepatic impairment | Pharmacokinetics | Monograph access link |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Donepezil (Aricept, Aricept RDT) | Tablet: 5 mg or 10 mg | Initial dose: 2.5–5 mg po daily Titration: increase by 2.5-5 mg every 4 wk Therapeutic dose: 5-10 mg/dMaximum dose: 10 mg/d |
No | No | Metabolized by CYP 3A4 and 2D6 | www.pfizer.ca/sites/g/files/g10017036/f/201505/ARICEPT_PM_E_177353_18Dec2014_R.pdf |
Galantamine (Reminyl ER) | Capsule: 8 mg, 16 mg, 24 mg | Initial dose: 8 mg po daily × 4 wk Titration: increase by 8 mg every 4 wk Therapeutic dose: 16-24 mg/d Maximum dose: 24 mg/d |
CrCl 9-60 mL/min: max 16 mg/d CrCl <9 mL/min: not recommended |
Moderate: max 16 mg/d Severe: not recommended |
Metabolized by CYP 3A4 and 2D6 | http://auropharma.ca/products/monograph/Auro-Galantamine-PM.pdf |
Rivastigmine (Exelon) | Capsule: 1.5 mg, 3 mg, 4.5 mg, 6 mg Oral solution: 2 mg/mL |
Initial dose: 1.5 mg po bid Titration: increase by 1.5 mg every 2-4 wk Therapeutic dose: 3-6 mg po bid Maximum dose: 6 mg po bid |
Mild-moderate: use with caution Severe: not recommended |
Not metabolized by CYP P450 | www.ask.novartispharma.ca/download.htm?res=exelon_scrip_e.pdf&resTitleId=740 | |
Rivastigmine patch (Exelon patch) | Exelon Patch 5 Exelon Patch 10 Exelon Patch 15 |
Initial dose: Exelon Patch 5: apply once daily Titration: increase to Exelon Patch 10 once daily every 4 wk Therapeutic dose: Exelon Patch 10: apply once daily Maximum dose: Exelon Patch 15: apply once daily If switching from oral rivastigmine, use Exelon Patch 5 for patients taking <3 mg bid and Exelon Patch 10 for patients taking 3-6 mg bid |
Dose titration with caution | Mild-moderate: use with caution Severe: not recommended |
https://www.novartis.ca/sites/www.novartis.ca/files/exelon%20patch_scrip_e.pdf | |
Memantine (Ebixa) | Tablet 10 mg | Initial dose: 5 mg po daily Titration: increase by 5 mg every 1 wk Therapeutic dose: 5-10 mg po bidMaximum dose: 10 mg po bid |
CrCl 30-49 mL/min: daily dose should be 10 mg/d; if well tolerated after ≥7 d of treatment and based on clinical response, dose may be titrated to 20 mg/d CrCl <30 mL/min: daily dosage should be 10 mg/d |
Mild-moderate: no dosage adjustment Severe: not recommended (lack of data) |
Metabolism: no appreciable CYP450 enzyme system involvement | https://www.lundbeck.com/upload/ca/en/files/pdf/product_monograph/EBIXA_PM_MKT_ctrl_138778_eng_v2_20Apr2011.pdf |
po = by mouth; bid = twice daily.
Cholinesterase inhibitors should be used cautiously in patients with bradycardia (heart rate <55 beats per minute), cardiac conduction abnormalities (e.g., left bundle branch block or sick sinus rhythm), epilepsy and seizure disorders. The most common adverse effects associated with this class of medication are gastrointestinal (e.g., nausea, vomiting, diarrhea) and stem from a rise in the central and peripheral concentration of acetylcholine. These adverse effects are usually transient and present when therapy starts or when the dose is increased. Other notable possible adverse effects that require monitoring include insomnia, somnolence, weight loss and syncope. Although no cholinesterase inhibitor has been shown to be superior to another to treat mild to moderate dementia, oral rivastigmine seems to be associated with the highest risk of gastrointestinal side effects.50-52 Transdermal rivastigmine provides a higher gastrointestinal tolerability than the oral formulation.53 Several studies have found that switching from an oral cholinesterase inhibitor to transdermal rivastigmine can be an effective therapeutic strategy after lack or loss of efficacy to a first agent or to improve gastrointestinal tolerability.54-57 Furthermore, as older adults are likely to have multiple comorbidities requiring treatment, a common clinical scenario is concurrent treatment of dementia and urinary incontinence. Anticholinergic drugs exert a pharmacological opposition with cholinesterase inhibitors. A prospective cohort study of older adults in nursing homes indicated that concurrent use of bladder anticholinergic drugs with cholinesterase inhibitors is associated with a greater rate of functional decline than use of a cholinesterase inhibitor alone.58
Memantine (Ebixa), an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, inhibits prolonged influx of calcium ions, thereby minimizing neuronal excitotoxicity, a mechanism involved in the neurodegenerative process of AD (Table 4). Memantine is indicated for the treatment of moderate to severe AD.59,60 Memantine is generally well tolerated, and its most common adverse effects include dizziness, drowsiness, constipation, agitation and headaches. Furthermore, a recent meta-analysis of 4 trials showed that combining a cholinesterase inhibitor with memantine in individuals with moderate to severe dementia provided modest benefits in the global clinical impression scale, cognition, behaviour and ability to perform activities of daily living than did monotherapy with a cholinesterase inhibitor.61
It is important to recognize that current pharmacological treatment options do not prevent advancement of dementia. Pharmacotherapy can delay the progression of cognitive, functional and behavioural outcomes and thereby improve quality of life for patients and caregivers, but it is essential that clinicians set realistic expectations of treatment outcomes. Furthermore, not every individual will respond to treatment. The efficacy of these therapeutic options is modest. Studies show that even though these medications can improve the global cognitive function in patients with AD by 1 to 3 points on the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive Subscale, a 4-point improvement over 6 months is required to be considered clinically meaningful.62 Moreover, the duration of most trials was only 23 to 26 weeks, so the efficacy of these agents over a period of years is unknown.
While the occurrence of adverse effects should be assessed within the first month of therapy, the efficacy of treatment should be evaluated about 3 to 6 months after its initiation. Observational studies suggest that continuing therapy with a cholinesterase inhibitor over a year is associated with reduced cognitive and functional decline,63-65 so the duration of therapy should be individualized.
Trials evaluating low-dose aspirin, statins, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and hormonal replacement therapy showed no benefit on global cognitive and physical function in individuals with MCI or with mild to moderate dementia.62,66
Cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine offer symptomatic pharmacological treatment of AD but do not affect neurodegenerative processes. Emerging therapeutic strategies to treat dementia are designed to prevent or interrupt the pathological mechanisms involved. Since AD is linked to amyloid-beta protein aggregation, the use of humanized monoclonal antibodies directed against the amyloid-beta peptide are posited to interfere with the amyloid cascade by preventing the accumulation of amyloid-beta plaques, thus slowing disease progression.67 Bapineuzumab and solanezumab have advanced furthest in clinical trials, but recent phase 3 trials (EXPEDITION, EXPEDITION2) indicate that solanezumab does not improve cognition and functional ability in individuals with mild-to-moderate AD (MMSE score 16-26).68 However, as solanezumab is superior to placebo in preventing cognitive and functional decline (MMSE score 20-26) in participants with mild dementia, a third trial (EXPEDITION3) has been launched to evaluate the efficacy of solanezumab in a population with mild AD.69
Conclusion
Managing dementia is particularly challenging because of the complexity of the disorder and limitations in current pharmacological options. The treatment plan for each patient should be individualized to provide the most effective and safe drug therapy. Subsequent articles will focus on the role of the pharmacist in assessing and applying this knowledge into practice. ■
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Mo Chen, MSc candidate at the University of Waterloo, for assistance in editing the section on assessment tools and generating Table 3 and Joe Petrik for copyediting and formatting the manuscript.
Footnotes
Author Contributions:S. Duong wrote the initial draft of the article. S. Duong, T. Patel and F. Chang reviewed and revised the article.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests:The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.
Funding:The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.
References
- 1. Alzheimer Society of Canada. Prevalence and monetary costs of dementia in Canada. Available: www.alzheimer.ca/~/media/Files/national/Statistics/PrevalenceandCostsofDementia_EN.pdf (accessed Sep. 19, 2016).
- 2. Chang F, Patel T, Schulz ME. The “rising tide” of dementia in Canada: what does it mean for pharmacists and the people they care for? Can Pharm J (Ott) 2015;148(4):193-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Chertkow H, Feldman HH, Jacova C, et al. Definitions of dementia and predementia states in Alzheimer’s disease and vascular cognitive impairment: consensus from the Canadian conference on diagnosis of dementia. Alzheimers Res Ther 2013;5(suppl 1):S2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Sheehan B. Assessment scales in dementia. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2012;5(6):349-58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Hildreth KL, Church S. Evaluation and management of the elderly patient presenting with cognitive complaints. Med Clin North Am 2015;99(2):311-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Alzheimer Society of Canada. Mild cognitive impairment. Available: www.alzheimer.ca/~/media/Files/national/Other-dementias/other_dementias_MCI_e.pdf (accessed Sep. 19, 2016).
- 7. Bruscoli M, Lovestone S. Is MCI really just early dementia? A systematic review of conversion studies. Int Psychogeriatr 2004;16(2):129-40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Matthews FE, Stephan BCM, McKeith IG, et al. Two-year progression from mild cognitive impairment to dementia: to what extent do different definitions agree? J Am Geriatr Soc 2008;56(8):1424-33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Palmer K, Bäckman L, Winblad B, et al. Mild cognitive impairment in the general population: occurrence and progression to Alzheimer disease. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2008;16(7):603-11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Ganguli M, Snitz BE, Saxton JA, et al. Outcomes of mild cognitive impairment by definition: a population study. Arch Neurol 2011;68(6):761-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Jack CR, Shiung MM, Gunter JL, et al. Comparison of different MRI brain atrophy rate measures with clinical disease progression in AD. Neurology 2004;62(4):591-600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Schmidtke K, Hermeneit S. High rate of conversion to Alzheimer’s disease in a cohort of amnestic MCI patients. Int Psychogeriatr 2008;20(1):96-108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Artero S, Ancelin M-L, Portet F, et al. Risk profiles for mild cognitive impairment and progression to dementia are gender specific. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008;79(9):979-84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Mitchell AJ, Shiri-Feshki M. Rate of progression of mild cognitive impairment to dementia—meta-analysis of 41 robust inception cohort studies. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2009;119(4):252-65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Larrieu S, Letenneur L, Orgogozo JM, et al. Incidence and outcome of mild cognitive impairment in a population-based prospective cohort. Neurology 2002;59(10):1594-99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Arlington (VA): American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 17. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Publishing; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 18. Muangpaisan W. Clinical differences among four common dementia syndromes. Geriatr Aging 2007;10(425):9. [Google Scholar]
- 19. Reitz C. Genetic diagnosis and prognosis of Alzheimer’s disease: challenges and opportunities. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2015;15(3):339-48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Alzheimer Society of Canada. Vascular dementia. Available: www.alzheimer.ca/en/About-dementia/Dementias/Vascular-Dementia (accessed Sep. 19, 2016).
- 21. Alzheimer Society of Canada. Lewy body dementia. Available: www.alzheimer.ca/en/About-dementia/Dementias/Lewy-Body-Dementia (accessed Sep. 19, 2016).
- 22. Zupancic M, Mahajan A, Handa K. Dementia with Lewy bodies: diagnosis and management for primary care providers. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2011;13(5). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Alzheimer Society of Canada. Frontotemporal dementia. Available: www.alzheimer.ca/en/About-dementia/Dementias/Frontotemporal-Dementia-and-Pick-s-disease (accessed Sep. 19, 2016).
- 24. Feldman HH, Jacova C, Robillard A, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of dementia: 2. Diagnosis. CMAJ 2008;178(7):825-36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Shastri A, Bangar S, Holmes J. Obstructive sleep apnoea and dementia: is there a link? Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2016;31(4):400-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Poggesi A, Inzitari D, Pantoni L. Atrial fibrillation and cognition: epidemiological data and possible mechanisms. Stroke 2015;46(11):3316-21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. de Bruijn RF, Heeringa J, Wolters FJ, et al. Association between atrial fibrillation and dementia in the general population. JAMA Neurol 2015;72(11):1288-94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-Mental State.” A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12(3):189-98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53(4):695-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Sunderland T, Hill JL, Mellow AM, et al. Clock drawing in Alzheimer’s disease. A novel measure of dementia severity. J Am Geriatr Soc 1989;37(8):725-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Iracleous P, Nie JX, Tracy CS, et al. Primary care physicians’ attitudes towards cognitive screening: findings from a national postal survey. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2010;25(1):23-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Ismail Z, Mulsant BH, Herrmann N, et al. Canadian academy of geriatric psychiatry survey of brief cognitive screening instruments. Can Geriatr J 2013;16(2):54-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Ostrosky-Solís F, López-Arango G, Ardila A. Sensitivity and specificity of the Mini-Mental State Examination in a Spanish-speaking population. Appl Neuropsychol 2000;7(1):25-31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Hodkinson HM. Evaluation of a mental test score for assessment of mental impairment in the elderly. Age Ageing 1972;1(4):233-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Jitapunkul S, Pillay I, Ebrahim S. The abbreviated mental test: its use and validity. Age Ageing 1991;20(5):332-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Borson S, Scanlan J, Brush M, et al. The Mini-Cog: a cognitive “vital signs” measure for dementia screening in multi-lingual elderly. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2000;15(11):1021-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Brodaty H, Moore CM. The Clock Drawing Test for dementia of the Alzheimer’s type: a comparison of three scoring methods in a memory disorders clinic. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1997;12(6):619-27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Brodaty H, Pond D, Kemp NM, et al. The GPCOG: a new screening test for dementia designed for general practice. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002;50(3):530-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Solomon PR, Hirschoff A, Kelly B, et al. A 7 minute neurocognitive screening battery highly sensitive to Alzheimer’s disease. Arch Neurol 1998;55(3):349-55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Buschke H, Kuslansky G, Katz M, et al. Screening for dementia with the memory impairment screen. Neurology 1999;52(2):231-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Daneschvar HL, Aronson MD, Smetana GW. Do statins prevent Alzheimer’s disease? A narrative review. Eur J Intern Med 2015;26(9):666-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Thomas J, Thomas CJ, Radcliffe J, et al. Omega-3 fatty acids in early prevention of inflammatory neurodegenerative disease: a focus on Alzheimer’s disease. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:172801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Vellas B, Coley N, Ousset P-J, et al. Long-term use of standardised Ginkgo biloba extract for the prevention of Alzheimer’s disease (GuidAge): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2012;11(10):851-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. DeKosky ST, Williamson JD, Fitzpatrick AL, et al. Ginkgo biloba for prevention of dementia: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2008;300(19):2253-62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Andrieu S, Coley N, Lovestone S, et al. Prevention of sporadic Alzheimer’s disease: lessons learned from clinical trials and future directions. Lancet Neurol 2015;14(9):926-44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Hogan DB, Bailey P, Black S, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of dementia: 5. Nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapy for mild to moderate dementia. CMAJ 2008;179(10):1019-26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Heyn P, Abreu BC, Ottenbacher KJ. The effects of exercise training on elderly persons with cognitive impairment and dementia: a meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85(10):1694-704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Forbes D, Forbes SC, Blake CM, et al. Exercise programs for people with dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;(4):CD006489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Fiatarone Singh MA, Gates N, Saigal N, et al. The Study of Mental and Resistance Training (SMART) study—resistance training and/or cognitive training in mild cognitive impairment: a randomized, double-blind, double-sham controlled trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2014;15(12):873-80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Harry RDJ, Zakzanis KK. A comparison of donepezil and galantamine in the treatment of cognitive symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analysis. Hum Psychopharmacol 2005;20(3):183-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Birks J. Cholinesterase inhibitors for Alzheimer’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;(1):CD005593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Wilcock G, Howe I, Coles H, et al. A long-term comparison of galantamine and donepezil in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Drugs Aging 2003;20(10):777-89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Winblad B, Cummings J, Andreasen N, et al. A six-month double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of a transdermal patch in Alzheimer’s disease—rivastigmine patch versus capsule. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2007;22(5):456-67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Gauthier S, Emre M, Farlow MR, et al. Strategies for continued successful treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: switching cholinesterase inhibitors. Curr Med Res Opin 2003;19(8):707-14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Cagnin A, Cester A, Costa B, et al. Effectiveness of switching to the rivastigmine transdermal patch from oral cholinesterase inhibitors: a naturalistic prospective study in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurol Sci 2015;36(3):457-63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Han HJ, Lee JJ, Park SA, et al. Efficacy and safety of switching from oral cholinesterase inhibitors to the rivastigmine transdermal patch in patients with probable Alzheimer’s disease. J Clin Neurol 2011;7(3):137-42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Sadowsky C, Perez JA, Bouchard RW, et al. Switching from oral cholinesterase inhibitors to the rivastigmine transdermal patch. CNS Neurosci Ther 2010;16(1):51-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Sink KM, Thomas J, Xu H, et al. Dual use of bladder anticholinergics and cholinesterase inhibitors: long-term functional and cognitive outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008;56(5):847-53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Reisberg B, Doody R, Stöffler A, et al. Memantine in moderate-to-severe Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med 2003;348(14):1333-41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. McShane R, Areosa Sastre A, Minakaran N. Memantine for dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;(2):CD003154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Schmidt R, Hofer E, Bouwman FH, et al. EFNS-ENS/EAN Guideline on concomitant use of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine in moderate to severe Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Neurol 2015;22(6):889-98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Lin JS, O’Connor E, Rossom R, et al. Screening for cognitive impairment in older adults: an evidence update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2013. Report No.: 14-05198-EF-1. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Rountree SD, Chan W, Pavlik VN, et al. Persistent treatment with cholinesterase inhibitors and/or memantine slows clinical progression of Alzheimer disease. Alzheimers Res Ther 2009;1(2):7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Rountree SD, Atri A, Lopez OL, et al. Effectiveness of antidementia drugs in delaying Alzheimer’s disease progression. Alzheimers Dement 2013;9(3):338-45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Hogan DB. Long-term efficacy and toxicity of cholinesterase inhibitors in the treatment of Alzheimer disease. Can J Psychiatry 2014;59(12):618-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. McGuinness B, Craig D, Bullock R, et al. Statins for the treatment of dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;(7):CD007514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Stella F, Radanovic M, Canineu PR, et al. Anti-dementia medications: current prescriptions in clinical practice and new agents in progress. Ther Adv Drug Saf 2015;6(4):151-65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Doody RS, Thomas RG, Farlow M, et al. Phase 3 trials of solanezumab for mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med 2014;370(4):311-21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Siemers ER, Sundell KL, Carlson C, et al. Phase 3 solanezumab trials: secondary outcomes in mild Alzheimer’s disease patients. Alzheimers Dement 2016;12(2):110-20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]