Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jan 16;76(5):882–885. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210441

The risk of fracture among patients with psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis: a population-based study

A Ogdie 1,*, L Harter 2,*, D Shin 3, JF Baker 4, J Takeshita 5, HK Choi 6, TJ Love 7, JM Gelfand 8
PMCID: PMC5384863  NIHMSID: NIHMS847874  PMID: 28093419

Abstract

Objective

To determine the risk of fracture and osteoporosis (OP) among patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and psoriasis, compared with the general population and patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

A population-based cohort study was performed in The Health Improvement Network in the United Kingdom using data from 1994–2014. Patients aged 18–89 with PsA or psoriasis and up to 5 unexposed controls matched by practice and start date within that practice were included. Patients with RA and matched controls were included for comparison. Severe psoriasis was defined by a code for psoriasis and either phototherapy or a systemic medication for psoriasis. Incidence and adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) for fracture (all, hip, vertebral) were calculated.

Results

Patients with PsA (N=9,788), psoriasis (N=158,323) and controls (N=821,834) were identified. Patients with PsA had an elevated risk of all fracture aHR 1.26 (1.06–1.27). Patients with mild psoriasis had elevated risk of all fractures, vertebral and hip fracture: aHR 1.07 (1.05–1.10), 1.17 (1.03–1.33) and 1.13 (1.04–1.22). Patients with severe psoriasis had significantly elevated risk of all fracture and vertebral fracture: aHR 1.26 (1.15–1.39) and 2.23 (1.54–3.22).

Conclusion

PsA and psoriasis are associated with an elevated risk for fracture.

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporosis (OP) is one of the most common and costly diseases: one in every two women and one in five men will experience a fracture after the age of 50.[1] Hospitalizations for OP fracture are more common than hospitalizations for myocardial infarction and stroke combined[2] and fractures result in pain, immobility, nursing home placement, isolation and depression, in addition to other health problems.[1] Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a known risk factor for osteoporosis.[4] Ankylosing spondylitis, despite its association with new bone formation and syndesmophytes, is also associated with vertebral osteoporosis and fractures.

While psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and psoriasis demonstrate a similar Th1 and Th17 driven inflammation to RA and a pathophysiologic link to AS, few studies have addressed the risk of OP in these patients [5, 6] Two studies have reported an increased prevalence of osteopenia or osteoporosis among patients with psoriasis in Taiwan and Israel.[7, 8] Additional studies examined bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with PsA compared to healthy controls, though with conflicting results.[913] These studies have been limited by cross-sectional designs and lack of adjustment for obesity, smoking or other risk factors for osteoporosis. To our knowledge, no studies have evaluated the risk of incident fracture in PsA or psoriasis. Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine the incidence of fracture in patients with PsA and psoriasis and compare this to matched controls from the general population and patients with RA.

METHODS

Study Design

We performed a longitudinal cohort study to examine the risk of incident fracture among patients with psoriasis and PsA compared to patients from the general population and patients with RA.

Data Source

Data from The Health Improvement Network (THIN) in the United Kingdom (UK) between 1994 and January 2014 was used.

Study Population

All patients with PsA or psoriasis between the ages of 18 and 89 at the start date were included if they had observation time in THIN after Vision software implementation. Patients were excluded if they died or transferred out of the practice prior to the implementation of Vision software. Patients with a history of fracture or osteoporosis or a history of bisphosphonate prescriptions were excluded. Patients with psoriasis, PsA and RA were matched to up to 5 unexposed controls from the general population (matching is described in the supplemental methods).

Exposure and Outcome Definitions

PsA, psoriasis, and RA were defined by the presence of at least one READ code consistent with these diseases using previously validated codes.[1923] Severe psoriasis was defined as a code for psoriasis plus a code for either phototherapy or a systemic medication for psoriasis. The outcomes of interest were fractures (all fractures, hip fracture, and vertebral fracture).[2427] Disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and covariates are listed in the supplemental methods.

Person time calculation

Cohort time started at the latest of the following: diagnosis with psoriasis, PsA, or RA (diagnosis date for unexposed controls was the encounter date within 6 months of the matched patient’s diagnosis date), 180 days after registration in the practice, or Vision date (software implementation in the practice). Cohort time ended at earliest of development of the outcome, transfer out of the practice, practice stops contributing to THIN, death, or the end of the study. All covariates of interest were measured prior to cohort entry.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to examine age, sex, person-time, and covariate distribution between patients with PsA, psoriasis and unexposed controls. The number of events and cumulative incidence of fracture were calculated for each group. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals. A purposeful selection modeling approach was used to determine in the most biologically plausible and parsimonious model.[28] The proportional hazards assumption was assessed using log-log plots. Sensitivity analyses are described in the supplementary data.

Ethics Review

This study was approved by the University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board and the Cegedim Scientific Review Committee. This paper was prepared according to STROBE guidelines.[29]

RESULTS

After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 9,788 patients with PsA, 158,323 patients with psoriasis, and 821,834 matched controls were identified. Baseline demographics are shown in Table 1 and Supplemental Table 1. Time in the cohort was similar among the groups. Approximately 5% of patients with psoriasis had been prescribed a DMARD or received phototherapy. Oral corticosteroids were prescribed for 17% of patients with PsA, 21% of patients with severe 9% of patients with mild psoriasis and controls. PPIs were commonly prescribed for patients with PsA and severe psoriasis (31% each) than controls and those with mild psoriasis (both 15%). Patients with PsA and psoriasis were also more likely to have been prescribed an antidepressant in the baseline period and had a higher prevalence of diabetes than controls. Those with mild or severe psoriasis were more likely to be current smokers, while patients with PsA and severe psoriasis had higher rates of heavy alcohol use.

Table 1.

Baseline Demographics

Control PsA Mild Psoriasis Severe Psoriasis RA

N 821,834 9,788 149,809 8,514 39,306
Age Mean
(SD)
50.18 (17.47) 49.74 (14.09) 46.67 (17.43) 49.29 (15.18) 58.71 (15.33)
Female Sex N (%) 469,431
(57.12%)
5,029 (51.38%) 79,961 (53.38%) 4,498 (52.83%) 27,198
(69.20%)
Cohort Time* Mean
(SD)
6.75 (4.87) 6.17 (4.67) 6.37 (4.80) 5.50 (4.19) 6.29 (4.67)
Visits in One
Year before start
Mean
(SD)
4.86 (6.45) 8.03 (8.81) 6.22 (6.72) 10.54 (10.13) 10.02 (9.61)
Cancer** N (%) 121,488
(14.78%)
1,218 (12.44%) 20,546 (13.71%) 1,264 (14.85%) 6,092 (15.50%)
Chronic Kidney
Disease
N (%) 17,335 (2.11%) 188 (1.92%) 2,426 (1.62%) 249 (2.92%) 1,332 (3.39%)
Atrial
Fibrillation
N (%) 16,923 (2.06%) 160 (1.63%) 2,425 (1.62%) 142 (1.67%) 1,263 (3.21%)
Diabetes N (%) 49,554 (6.03%) 743 (7.59%) 8,091 (5.40%) 768 (9.02%) 3,204 (8.15%)
Cardiovascular
Disease
N (%) 48,647 (5.92%) 458 (4.68%) 7,640 (5.10%) 479 (5.63%) 3,712 (9.44%)
COPD N (%) 17,585 (2.14%) 207 (2.11%) 3,262 (2.18%) 233 (2.74%) 1,654 (4.21%)
Liver disease N (%) 9,653 (1.17%) 182 (1.86%) 1,947 (1.30%) 163 (1.91%) 594 (1.51%)
Dementia N (%) 3,963 (0.48%) 32 (0.33%) 788 (0.53%) 30 (0.35%) 357 (0.91%)
Stroke N (%) 21,827 (2.66%) 205 (2.09%) 3,450 (2.30%) 212 (2.49%) 1,613 (4.10%)
Anti-depressant
use
N (%) 178,630
(21.74%)
2,861 (29.23%) 33,252 (22.20%) 2,834 (33.29%) 11,805
(30.03%)
Anti-epileptic
use
N (%) 25,338 (3.08%) 398 (4.07%) 4,774 (3.19%) 424 (4.98%) 1,877 (4.78%)
Oral
corticosteroids
N (%) 77,521 (9.43%) 1,645 (16.81%) 12,811 (8.55%) 1,819 (21.36%) 11,532
(29.34%)
PPI use N (%) 125,493
(15.27%)
3,021 (30.86%) 22,615 (15.10%) 2,666 (31.31%) 13,408
(34.11%)
Hormone
therapy***
N (%) 252,829
(30.76%)
2,643 (27.00%) 40,218 (26.85%) 2,521 (29.61%) 11,158
(28.39%)
Smoking Never/
Former
(N, %)
561,085
(68.27%)
6,966 (71.17%) 92,044 (61.44%) 5,658 (66.46%) 26,497
(67.41%)
Current
(N, %)
170,562
(20.75%)
2,011 (20.55%) 41,751 (27.87%) 2,322 (27.27%) 8,676 (22.07%)
Missing
(N, %)
90,187 (10.97%) 811 (8.29%) 16,041 (10.69%) 534 (6.27%) 4,133 (10.51%)
Alcohol Use Never (N,
%)
96,244 (11.72%) 1,150 (11.75%) 16,023 (10.70%) 973 (11.43%) 6,503 (16.54%)
Some (N,
%)
519,079
(63.16%)
6,462 (66.02%) 97,034 (64.77%) 5,600 (65.77%) 23,137
(58.86%)
Heavy
(N, %)
31,735 (3.86%) 477 (4.87%) 5,501 (3.67%) 552 (6.48%) 2,167 (5.51%)
Missing
(N, %)
174,676
(21.25%)
1,699 (17.36%) 31,251 (20.86%) 1,389 (16.31%) 7,499 (19.08%)
BMI Mean
(SD)
26.39 (5.46) 28.03 (5.86) 26.65 (5.60) 28.08 (6.11) 26.69 (5.55)
Missing
(N, %)
168,709
(20.53%)
1,659 (16.95%) 30,833 (20.58%) 1,327 (15.59%) 7,446 (18.94%)
*

Time from index date to end date

**

Cancer includes hematologic malignancy and solid tumor malignancies

***

Hormone therapy refers to the use of oral contraceptives as well as hormone replacement therapy

Abbreviations: PPI = proton pump inhibitor; BMI = Body Mass Index

The number of events, unadjusted incidence per 10,000 person-years, and hazard ratios for fracture are presented in Table 2. Results for RA are included in the table for comparison. After adjusting for OP risk factors, patients with PsA and psoriasis had elevated risk for incident fracture: PsA 1.16 (95% CI 1.06–1.27), mild psoriasis 1.07 (1.05–1.10), and severe psoriasis HR 1.26 (1.15–1.39). Patients with mild psoriasis had an elevated risk for hip fracture 1.13 (1.04–1.22,) and vertebral fracture (HR 1.17, 1.03–1.33). Patients with severe psoriasis had a substantially elevated risk for vertebral fracture: HR 2.23 (1.54–3.22). These results were robust to several sensitivity analyses (Supplemental Table 3–4). Defining fracture by a code for fracture followed by a bisphosphonate prescription resulted in slight increases in the HR. The results did not substantially change when patients with a history of fracture were included.

Table 2.

Hazard Ratios for Incident Fracture.

ALL FRACTURES

Number of
Events
Incidence* Unadjusted Age/Sex
Adjusted
Fully
Adjusted**
HR CI HR CI HR CI
Controls 49,168 92.18 REF REF REF
PsA 575 99.23 1.09 1.00–1.18 1.14 1.05–1.24 1.16 1.06–1.27
Mild Psoriasis 8,470 92.38 1.01 0.98–1.03 1.09 1.07–1.12 1.07 1.05–1.10
Severe Psoriasis 537 119.91 1.33 1.22–1.45 1.42 1.30–1.55 1.26 1.15–1.39
RA 3,460 148.44 1.63 1.57–1.68 1.32 1.28–1.37 1.23 1.18–1.28

HIP FRACTURE

Number of
Events
Incidence* Unadjusted Age/Sex
Adjusted
Fully
Adjusted***
HR CI HR CI HR CI

Controls 5,930 10.71 REF REF REF
PsA 54 8.97 0.86 0.66–1.12 1.27 0.97–1.66 1.17 0.86–1.59
Mild Psoriasis 930 9.78 0.92 0.86–0.99 1.16 1.08–1.24 1.13 1.04–1.22
Severe Psoriasis 55 11.77 1.17 0.90–1.53 1.69 1.29–2.20 1.21 0.88–1.66
RA 730 29.81 2.85 2.64–3.08 1.77 1.64–1.91 1.55 1.40–1.72

VERTEBRAL FRACTURE

Number of
Events
Incidence* Unadjusted Age/Sex
Adjusted
Fully
Adjusted****
HR CI HR CI HR CI

Controls 2,009 3.62 REF REF REF
PsA 20 3.32 0.94 0.60–1.46 1.06 0.69–1.65 1.07 0.66–1.72
Mild Psoriasis 371 3.89 1.09 0.97–1.21 1.24 1.11–1.39 1.17 1.03–1.33
Severe Psoriasis 32 6.85 2.02 1.42–2.87 2.35 1.66–3.33 2.23 1.54–3.22
RA 209 8.48 2.40 2.08–2.76 1.70 1.48–1.96 1.53 1.30–1.80
*

Incidence per 10,000 person-years

The fully adjusted models for each outcome were slightly different after employing a purposeful selection process. The variables contained within each model are specified as below.

**

The all fracture model was adjusted for age, sex, cancer, atrial fibrillation, CKD, diabetes, COPD, liver disease, stroke, dementia, SSRI use, TCA use, anti-epileptic use, PPI use, oral steroids, hormone treatment, cyclosporine, smoking, and categorical BMI

***

The hip fracture model was adjusted for age, sex, cancer, atrial fibrillation, CKD, CVD, diabetes, COPD, stroke, dementia, SSRI use, TCA use, anti-epileptic use, oral steroids, hormone treatment, cyclosporine, smoking, and categorical BMI

****

The vertebral fracture model was adjusted for age, sex, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, COPD, stroke, SSRI use, TCA use, PPI use, oral steroids, smoking, and categorical BMI

Abbreviations: PPI = proton pump inhibitor; BMI = Body Mass Index, COPD=chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CKD=chronic kidney disease; SSRI = selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor; TCA = tricyclic antidepressant

DISCUSSION

In this study, we found patients with PsA and psoriasis had an increased prevalence of risk factors for OP and fracture (e.g., diabetes, alcohol abuse, smoking, depression, antidepressant use, corticosteroids, methotrexate, and cyclosporine).[3, 3034]. Additionally, patients with PsA and psoriasis had an increased incidence of fracture compared to the general population by 7–26%. The incidence of vertebral fracture was also increased in patients with severe psoriasis and while hip fracture was elevated in both psoriasis groups, it was only statistically significant in patients with mild psoriasis relative to matched controls after adjusting for risk factors for osteoporosis. We found that the risk for any fracture in patients with PsA and severe psoriasis was similar to RA. To our knowledge, these are the first population based estimates of the risk for incident fracture and osteoporosis in patients with psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis and the first longitudinal cohort study to address this issue.

Strengths of this study include a large cohort of patients with an average of 6 years of follow-up, the use of THIN in which the exposures definitions (codes for PsA, RA, psoriasis) have been validated and fractures have been previously examined[1923], and the ability to adjust for other measured risk factors for osteoporosis including concomitant medications, BMI and smoking. Additionally, inclusion of a cohort of patients RA for internal comparison provides validity to the results as our estimates for RA were similar to previous studies.[3537] Similarly, the incidence of hip fracture among controls in our study was similar to population statistics in the UK (10.7 v. 10.3 per 10,000 person-years), further supporting the validity of our results.[38] Finally, the hazard ratios were robust to numerous sensitivity analyses.

Our study also has limitations. There is a risk for misclassification of the outcome when using diagnosis codes to define an event rather than imaging. We addressed this through sensitivity analyses in which we changed the outcome definition; this did not significantly change the results. We also used a secondary definition for fracture in which we required a therapy for osteoporosis to address osteoporotic fractures. Vertebral fracture may be underdiagnosed and thus under recorded.[3] We conducted a sensitivity analysis to examine whether observation bias effected these results and found no difference when we only included patients in the study followed at least once yearly. Next, disease manifestations, disease activity and use of biologic DMARDs are not available in THIN, and therefore we were unable to directly examine their effects on risk of osteoporosis and fracture. We were also unable to account for some lifestyle factors such as degree of immobility or laboratory parameters such as vitamin D. Finally, the relatively small number of patients with PsA and/or severe psoriasis, may have resulted in insufficient power for some of the outcomes, resulting in wide confidence intervals that include 1.0 despite elevated point estimates (e.g., for hip fracture among patients with severe psoriasis).[39]

In conclusion, fractures, in particular osteoporotic fractures, are a major health problem that results in poor outcomes and osteoporosis is largely under-diagnosed. We found that similar to PsA and psoriasis (both mild and severe) were associated with an increased risk for fractures. Screening and management of osteoporosis should still be considered for patients with psoriasis and PsA using guidelines available for the general population.[6, 37]

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Tables

Acknowledgments

We thank Yihui Jiang for administrative support. Funds to extract the data relevant for this cohort study were provided by the Rheumatology Research Foundation Preceptorship Award. AO is supported by NIH by K23 AR063764. JT is supported by NIAMS K23AR068433. JFB is supported by a Veterans Affairs Clinical Science Research & Development Career Development Award (IK2 CX000955). JMG is supported by NIH/NIAMS K24 AR064310.

Footnotes

COMPETING INTERESTS: Dr. Ogdie has received support from an investigator-initiated research grant from Pfizer and has consulted for Novartis and Pfizer and has received payment for continuing medical education work related to psoriatic arthritis. Dr. Takeshita has an investigator-initiated research grant from Pfizer and has received payment for continuing medical education work related to psoriasis. Dr. Gelfand served as a consultant for Abbvie, Astrazeneca, Celgene Corp, Coherus, Eli Lilly, Janssen Biologics (formerly Centocor), Sanofi, Merck, Novartis Corp, Endo, Valeant, and Pfizer Inc., receiving honoraria; and receives research grants (to the Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania) from Abbvie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis Corp, Regeneron, and Pfizer Inc.; and received payment for continuing medical education work related to psoriasis.

CONTRIBUTORS: Drs. Ogdie and Harter designed the study, performed the statistical analysis, wrote the first draft of the paper and integrated feedback. Dr. Shin assisted in assembling the analytic dataset. All of the co-authors assisted in interpretation of the data and provided feedback on the manuscript draft. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.

ETHICS APPROVAL: This study used de-identified patient information, and was therefore eligible for IRB exemption. The Cegedim Scientific Review Committee also reviewed and approved the study protocol.

TRANSPARENCY: AO affirms that the manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported; no aspects of the study have been omitted. There were no deviations from the original study plan.

DATA SHARING: While we are unable to share the datasets, code lists are available upon request.

Contributor Information

A Ogdie, Division of Rheumatology, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Center for Pharmacoepidemiology Research and Training, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

L Harter, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

D Shin, Department of Dermatology, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

JF Baker, Division of Rheumatology, Philadelphia Veterans Administration Medical Center, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.

J Takeshita, Department of Dermatology, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Center for Pharmacoepidemiology Research and Training, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

HK Choi, Professor of Medicine and Epidemiology, Division of Rheumatology and Allergy/Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

TJ Love, Division of Rheumatology, Landspitali University Hospital, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.

JM Gelfand, Department of Dermatology, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Center for Pharmacoepidemiology Research and Training, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Wright NC, Looker AC, Saag KC, et al. The recent prevalence of osteoporosis and low bone mass in the United States based on bone mineral density at the femoral neck or lumbar spine. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29:2520–2526. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Singer A, Exuzides A, Spangler L, et al. Burden of illness for osteoporotic fractures compared with other serious diseases among postmenopausalwomen in the United States. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Jan;90:53–62. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. [Accessed June 30, 2015];Epidemiology of Osteoporosis. Available at: http://www.iofbonehealth.org/epidemiology.
  • 4.Goldring S. Inflammatory signaling induced bone loss. Bone. 2015 May; doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.05.024. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Del Puente A, Esposito A, Parisi A, et al. Osteoporosis and psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol Suppl. 2012 Jul;89:36–38. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.120240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ogdie A, Schwartzman S, Husni M. Recognizing and managing comorbidities in psoriatic arthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2015 Mar;27:118–126. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dreiher J, Weitzman D, Cohen A. Psoriasis and osteoporosis: a sex-specific association? J Invest Dermatol. 2009 Jul;129:1643–1649. doi: 10.1038/jid.2008.432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Keller J, Kang J, Lin H. Association between osteoporosis and psoriasis: results from the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database inTaiwan. Osteoporos Int. 2013 Jun;24:1835–1841. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2185-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Frediani B, Allegri A, Falsetti P, et al. Bone mineral density in patietns with psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2001;28:138–143. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nolla JM, Fiter J, Rozadilla A, et al. Bone mineral density in patients with peripheral psoriatic arthritis. Rev Rheum Engl Ed. 1999;66:457–461. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Riesco M, Manzano F, Font P, et al. Osteoporosis in psoriatic arthritis: an assessment of densitometry and fragility fractures. Clin Rheumatol. 2013 Dec;32:1799–1804. doi: 10.1007/s10067-013-2322-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Busquets N, Vaquero C, Moreno J, et al. Bone mineral density status and frequency of osteoporosis and clinical fractures in 155 patients with psoriaticarthritis followed in a university hospital. Reumatol Clin. 2014 Mar-Apr;10:89–93. doi: 10.1016/j.reuma.2013.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Reddy S, Anandarajah A, Fisher M, et al. Comparative analysis of disease activity measures, use of biologic agents, body mass index, radiographic features, and bone density in psoriatic arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis patients followed in a large U.S. disease registry. J Rheumatol Suppl. 2010;37:2566–2572. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.100483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ogdie A, Langan S, Parkinson J, et al. Medical Record Databases. In: Strom B, Kimmel S, Hennessy S, editors. Pharmacoepidemiology. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012. pp. 224–243. [Google Scholar]
  • 15. [Accessed Oct 2, 2013];The Health Improvement Network: Our Data. Available at: http://csdmruk.cegedim.com/our-data/our-data.shtml.
  • 16.Lewis JD, Schinnar R, Bilker WB, et al. Validation studies of the health improvement network (THIN) database for pharmacoepidemiology research. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007;16:393–401. doi: 10.1002/pds.1335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Haynes K, Bilker WB, Tenhave TR, et al. Temporal and within practice variability in the health improvement network. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011;20:948–955. doi: 10.1002/pds.2191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Blak B, Thompson M, Dattani H, et al. Generalisability of The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database: demographics, chronic disease prevalence and mortality rates. Informatics in Primary Care. 2011;19:251–255. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v19i4.820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Seminara NM, Abuabara K, Shin DB, et al. Validity of The Health Improvement Network (THIN) for the study of psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2011;164:602–609. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.10134.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ogdie A, Alehashemi S, Love T, et al. Validity of psoriatic arthritis and capture of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs in The Health Improvement Network. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2014;23:918–922. doi: 10.1002/pds.3677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Garcia Rodriguez LA, Tolosa LB, Ruigomez A, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis in UK primary care: incidence and prior morbidity. Scand J Rheumatol. 2009;38:173–177. doi: 10.1080/03009740802448825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Watson DJ, Rhodes T, Bing C, et al. Lower Risk of Thromboembolic Cardiovascular Events with Naproxen Among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:1105–1110. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.10.1105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Watson DJ, Rhodes T, Guess HA. All-cause mortality and vascular events among patients with rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, or no arthritis in the UK General Practice Research Database. J Rheumatol. 2003;30:1196–1202. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Vosse D, Landewé R, van der Heijde D, et al. Ankylosing spondylitis and the risk of fracture: results from a large primary care-based nested case-control study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Dec;68:1839–1842. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.100503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gutiérrez L, Roskell N, Castellsague J, et al. Study of the incremental cost and clinical burden of hip fractures in postmenopausal women in the United Kingdom. J Med Econ. 2011;14:99–107. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2010.547967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gutiérrez L, Roskell N, Castellsague J, et al. Clinical burden and incremental cost of fractures in postmenopausal women in the United Kingdom. Bone. 2012;51:324–331. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.05.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Misra D, Zhang Y, Peloquin C, et al. Incident long-term warfarin use and risk of osteoporotic fractures: propensity-score matched cohort of elders with new onset atrial fibrillation. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25:1677–1684. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2662-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bursac Z, Gauss CH, Williams DK, et al. Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression. Source Code Biol Med. 2008;3 doi: 10.1186/1751-0473-3-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Epidemiology. 2007;18:800–804. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181577654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wu Q, Qu W, Crowell MD, et al. Tricyclic antidepressant use and risk of fractures: a meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28:753–763. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Golob A, Laya MB. Osteoporosis: Screening, Prevention and Management. Med Clin N Am. 2015;99:587–606. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2015.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bernabei R, Martone A, Ortolani E, et al. Screening, diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis: a brief review. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2014 Sep;11:201–207. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Collins GS, Mallett S, Altman DG. Predicting risk of osteoporotic and hip fracture in the United Kingdom: prospective independent and external validation of QFractureScores. BMJ. 2011;342:d3651. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d3651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Vestergaard P, Rejnmakr L, Mosekilde L. Methotrexate, Azathioprine, Cyclosporine and Risk of Fracture. Calcif Tissue Int. 2006;79:69–75. doi: 10.1007/s00223-006-0060-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.van Staa TP, Geusens P, Bijlsma JWJ, et al. Clinical assessment of the long-term risk of fracture in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 2006;54:3104–3112. doi: 10.1002/art.22117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kim SY, Schneeweiss S, Liu J, et al. Risk of osteoporotic fracture in large population-based cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12:R154. doi: 10.1186/ar3107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mullen MB, Saag KG. Evaluating and mitigating fracture risk in established rheumatoid arthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2015;29:614–627. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2015.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.National Clinical Guideline Centre (UK) The management of hip fracture in adults. London, UK: Royal College of Physicians; 2011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ogdie A, Troxel AB, Mehta NN, et al. Psoriasis and Cardiovascular Risk: Strength in Numbers Part 3. J Invest Dermatol. 2015;135:2148–2150. doi: 10.1038/jid.2015.218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Tables

RESOURCES