Skip to main content
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research logoLink to Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
. 2017 Jan 3;475(5):1446–1447. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5209-1

CORR Insights®: What is the Incidence of Suicide in Patients with Bone and Soft Tissue Cancer?

Kenneth R Gundle 1,
PMCID: PMC5384923  PMID: 28050811

Where Are We Now?

Siracuse and colleagues performed a retrospective analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program and found a greater incidence of suicide in patients with bone and soft-tissue cancer than the United States general population. The authors narrowed the focus of a broader study that previously reported on the higher incidence of suicide among all patients with cancer [5]. The current study is a stark reminder of the impact of these diagnoses on patients’ lives, and that clinicians need to consider more than size, depth, and grade to guide treatment.

Suicide and depression are intimately related to health-related quality-of-life, a topic that has become a movement within cancer care [2, 6]. For bone and soft-tissue cancers in particular, treatment may impact both short- and long-term function. Schreiber and colleagues [7] found that limited participation in routine life roles had the largest effect on the quality-of-life of patients with soft-tissue sarcoma. Patients with extremity sarcoma may also develop psychological distress, with rates of anxiety and depression between 12% and 47% [5].

Where Do We Need to Go?

Improving survival while also maximizing function and quality-of-life for patients with bone and soft-tissue cancers is our goal. Not all gains need to come from novel therapeutics or reconstruction techniques; if patients with suicidal thoughts or intentions could be identified and successful interventions implemented, that would be a considerable step forward.

The study design of Siracuse and colleagues could not establish cause. Patients who received neither radiation nor surgery and may have been inoperable, as well as those with pelvic or vertebral column cancers who likely underwent extensive surgery, appeared to be at higher risk for suicide. It seems likely that the mental-health (and suicide-prevention) interventions we might consider should vary based on a number of oncological parameters. For example, the risk of suicide probably differs among patients with progressive metastatic disease, patients who are expected to survive the cancer diagnosis (but who might remain profoundly limited or in chronic pain), and patients whose tumors have been resected and successfully reconstructed; as such, the intensity of screening and psychological support of these groups of patients probably should vary, as well. To help guide such interventions, further study is warranted on the risk factors and contributors to suicide risk in this population.

Improving quality-of-life is an increasing focus of research questions throughout orthopaedic surgery, cancer care, and the medical field as a whole. Providing complete care for patients with bone and soft-tissue cancer goes beyond a combination of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Large databases help to identify trends, as Siracuse and colleagues have done here. While institutions are increasingly collecting wide-ranging patient-reported information in clinical practice [1, 8], data collection alone will not address the elevated incidence of suicide.

How Do We Get There?

Interventions identifying and addressing depression, suicide risk, or quality-of-life need prospective study, which could include an assessment of their ability to lower the incidence of suicide. Evidence from other cancers has shown that providing appropriate early palliative care interventions and support improves quality-of-life for patients with metastatic disease [4], although this has not yet translated into a lower risk of suicide, as far as we know. There is also a need for process-improvement research, which could guide us on how to organize screening programs in ways that are clinically meaningful as well as feasible [2, 3, 8].

Those who treat bone and soft-tissue cancer must recognize the elevated risk of suicide in this patient population. As new evidence is revealed, surgeons should not shy away from getting more involved in this important side of patient care.

Footnotes

This CORR Insights® is a commentary on the article “What is the Incidence of Suicide in Patients with Bone and Soft Tissue Cancer?” by Siracuse and colleagues available at: DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-5171-y.

The author certifies that neither he, nor any members of his immediate family, have any commercial associations (such as consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research ® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

The opinions expressed are those of the writers, and do not reflect the opinion or policy of CORR ® or The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons®.

This CORR Insights® comment refers to the article available at DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-5171-y.

This comment refers to the article available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-5171-y.

References

  • 1.Ayers DC, Zheng H, Franklin PD. Integrating patient-reported outcomes into orthopaedic clinical practice: proof of concept from FORCE-TJR. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:3419–3425. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3143-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Committee on Improving the Quality of Cancer Care: Addressing the Challenges of an Aging Population; Board on Health Care Services; Institute of Medicine. Levit L, Balogh E, Nass S, Ganz PA, eds. Delivering High-Quality Cancer Care: Charting a New Course for a System in Crisis. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2013. [PubMed]
  • 3.Howell D, Molloy S, Wilkinson K, Green E, Orchard K, Wang K, Liberty J. Patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer clinical practice: A scoping review of use, impact on health outcomes, and implementation factors. Ann Oncology. 2015;26:1846–1858. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Howie L, Peppercorn J. Early palliative care in cancer treatment: Rationale, evidence and clinical implications. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2013;5:318–323. doi: 10.1177/1758834013500375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Misono S, Weiss NS, Fann JR, Redman M, Yueh B. Incidence of suicide in persons with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:4731–4738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 6.Parikh RB, Kirch RA, Brawley OW. Advancing a quality-of-life agenda in cancer advocacy: Beyond the war metaphor. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1:423–424. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schreiber D, Bell RS, Wunder JS, O’Sullivan B, Turcotte R, Masri BA, Davis AM. Evaluating function and health related quality of life in patients treated for extremity soft tissue sarcoma. Qual Life Res. 2006;15:1439–1446. doi: 10.1007/s11136-006-0001-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Trautmann F, Hentschel L, Hornemann B, Rentsch A, Baumann M, Ehninger G, Schmitt J, Schuler M. Electronic real-time assessment of patient-reported outcomes in routine care—first findings and experiences from the implementation in a comprehensive cancer center. Support Care Center. 2016;24:3047–3056. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3127-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research are provided here courtesy of The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons

RESOURCES