Abstract
Bordetella pertussis infection has been increasing in the US, with reported cases reaching over 50,000 in 2012, a number last observed in the 1950s. Concurrently, B. pertussis lacking the pertactin protein, one of the immunogens included in the acellular vaccine formulations, has rapidly emerged since 2010, and has become the predominant circulating phenotype. Monitoring the production of the remaining acellular vaccine immunogens, such as pertussis toxin (Pt), is a critical next step. To date, methods for screening Pt have been either through genomic sequencing means or by conventional ELISAs. However, sequencing limits detection to the DNA level, missing potential disruptions in transcription or translation. Conventional ELISAs are beneficial for detecting the protein; however, they can often suffer from poor sensitivity and specificity. Here we describe a rapid, highly sensitive and specific electrochemiluminescent capture ELISA that can detect Pt production in prepared inactivated bacterial suspensions. Over 340 isolates were analyzed and analytical validation parameters, such as precision, reproducibility, and stability, were rigorously tested. Intra-plate and inter-plate variability measured at 9.8% and 11.5%, respectively. Refrigerated samples remained stable for two months and variability was unaffected (coefficient of variation was 12%). Interestingly, despite the intention of being a qualitative method, the assay was sensitive enough to detect a small, but statistically significant, difference in protein production between different pertussis promoter allelic groups of strains, ptxP1 and ptxP3. This technology has the ability to perform screening of multiple antigens at one time, thus, improving testing characteristics while minimizing costs, specimen volume, and testing time.
Introduction
Pertussis, a highly contagious respiratory disease caused by the bacterium Bordetella pertussis, has made a resurgence globally among some highly vaccinated populations [1]. Epidemics have occurred in many US states, with national peaks in 2005, 2010, 2012 and 2014, reaching over 50,000 cases, and increasing endemicity throughout the US [2, 3]. Many reasons have been attributed to this resurgence, such as better diagnostics, more clinical awareness, and waning immunity from the acellular pertussis vaccine [4, 5].
It has also been postulated that the bacterium is genetically evolving in response to vaccine induced immunity, citing the major genetic shifts observed in the predominant allele types of the B. pertussis virulence factors that are included in the acellular vaccine formulations [6]. One such example is the genetic shift observed with the pertussis toxin promoter from ptxP1 to ptxP3 over the last few decades. An increase in the production of Pt has been associated with the genetic change to the ptxP3 genotype, leading some to suggest a related increased virulence that could explain the global pertussis resurgence [7–11].
Most recently, there has been a dramatic increase in the loss of pertactin, one of the acellular vaccine components, among circulating strains in the US [12]. The loss of pertactin appears to be due to vaccine pressure among populations that are highly vaccinated with acellular pertussis vaccines [13]. Therefore, the question to be asked is if the bacterium will also respond to vaccine pressure with the loss of additional acellular vaccine components. Vaccine components in the two licensed vaccines in the US are pertussis toxin (Pt), filamentous hemagglutinin (Fha), and pertactin (Prn) with or without fimbriae 2 (Fim2) and 3 (Fim3). Other countries have identified the loss of other immunogens, albeit on very rare occasions and sporadically [14, 15]. In 2016, an isolate was reported to be both Prn- and Pt-deficient, the first of its kind in the US [16].
The loss of production of additional vaccine immunogens has been concerning for many countries that use only acellular pertussis vaccines. In response, many countries have in place, as part of their routine surveillance, testing for the production of vaccine immunogens by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) [14]. Conventional ELISAs are simple, reproducible assays that can rapidly determine if a protein is being produced; however, they are also known to have small dynamic ranges and high background, which gives a narrow separation between positive and negative signals. Here we describe the development and validation of a new immunoassay for screening Pt production in circulating B. pertussis isolates, using electrochemiluminescence technology that provides more sensitivity, less background, requires much smaller volumes of reagents, and is highly reproducible, allowing for a much higher discrimination between positive and negative results.
Materials and methods
Bordetella pertussis isolates
Testing was performed on 346 B. pertussis isolates, consisting of 241 from the Enhanced Pertussis Surveillance (EPS), emerging infectious program sites CO, CT, GA, MN, NM, NY, and OR, from 2012–2015; 64 isolates from the 2010 and 2014 CA epidemics [3, 17]; 37 ptxP1 isolates collected from 1947–2013; and four laboratory controls (Tohama I (two isolations), H921, and FR3749). The isolates were previously characterized in-house using a multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) scheme that includes the pertussis toxin operon and its promoter (ptxA and ptxP) as two of its targets [18]. Three isolates, FR3749, I979, and J365, do not produce Pt due to a 28kb deletion that includes the loss of the entire ptx/ptl operon, as confirmed by sequencing and western blot analyses [15, 16, 19]. H921 and purified Pt (Protein Express, Ohio, USA) were included as positive controls.
Bacterial suspension inactivation
Several methods of bacterial inactivation were evaluated, which included treatment with disinfectants 5% MicroChem-Plus (National Chemical Laboratories, Pennsylvania, USA) and 20% chlorhexidine (MP Biomedicals, California, USA) for 5 minutes, UVC (254 nm) inactivation (time of inactivation included 15, 30, 45 minutes at 10 cm distance), freeze-thaw (three times), and bacterial xTractor lysis buffer (Clontech, California, USA) containing 25U of benzonase (Sigma-Aldrich, Missouri, USA). Inactivated bacterial cell suspensions from each treatment method were cultured on Regan-Lowe agar without cephalexin for 10 days at 37°C, and checked daily for microbial growth. Additionally, each inactivation method was evaluated on ease-of-use and throughput level. The lysis buffer was selected as the method for bacterial inactivation used during assay development.
Bacterial cell culture and preparation
All B. pertussis isolates were stored frozen in -80°C at the first passage and sub-cultured on Regan-Lowe agar without cephalexin (prepared in-house) for 3 days at 37°C. Bacterial isolates were harvested and re-suspended in 2.0mL of in-house prepared 0.01M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to a final turbidity measurement of 0.95–1.05 using a Dade Behring MicroScan Turbidity Meter (Siemens Global, Munich, Germany). A 200μL aliquot of each suspension was transferred to a corresponding micro-centrifuge tube, and spun at 2655 x g for 10 minutes at room temperature in an Eppendorf benchtop centrifuge (model 5417C, rotor F45-30-11). To inactivate the cellular suspension, the bacterial pathogen supernatant was removed and the cell pellets were re-suspended in 200μL of xTractor lysis buffer (Clontech) containing 25U of benzonase (Sigma-Aldrich). Samples were vortexed for 10 minutes at room temperature, then centrifuged for an additional 10 minutes, at 2655 x g. Supernatants were removed and pellets were re-suspended in 200μL of 0.01M PBS. Prepared inactivated bacterial suspensions were stored at 4°C to be tested, in duplicate, the following day.
Capture assay overview
This electrochemiluminescence (ECL)-based assay was developed on the SECTOR Imager 6000 platform (Meso-Scale Discovery, Maryland, USA), a high throughput ECL reader that detects emitted light from the non-radioactive label when it is electrochemically stimulated, producing minimal background signal. Cell-associated Pt was captured with 30uL/well of sheep anti-pertussis toxin serum (NIBSC, UK) solution prepared in PBS at 1:10,000 dilution, that was immobilized on high binding carbon electrodes surface of a standard MULTI-ARRAY 96-well plate (Meso-Scale Discovery, Maryland, USA) and incubated overnight at 4°C. The plate was washed on the following day with 0.05% PBS-tween wash buffer (Sigma-Aldrich) and blocked with 150μL of prepared blocking buffer for 30 minutes at room temperature on a shaking platform. The in-house prepared blocking buffer contained 2% goat serum (Sigma-Aldrich), 2% Blocker A (MSD) and 5% skim milk (Fisher Scientific, Pennsylvania, USA), diluted in PBS.
After blocking, the buffer was removed and 25μL of bacterial suspension was added to the plate and incubated on a shaking platform for one hour at room temperature. The plate was washed six times, with 300μL of wash buffer. Pt was detected with 25μL of mouse anti-pertussis toxin subunit 1 monoclonal antibody (NIBSC, UK, clone 10D6) at 1000-fold dilution prepared in blocking buffer [20, 21]. The plate was incubated on a shaking platform at room temperature for 45 minutes, then washed three times. Next, 25μL of goat anti-mouse sulfotag labeled antibody (MSD), prepared in blocking buffer at a 1μg/mL concentration, was added to the plate and incubated on a shaking platform at room temperature for 45 minutes. The plate was subsequently washed, 150μL of 2X Read Buffer T with surfactant (MSD) solution prepared in water was added to each well, and the plate was read immediately on the SECTOR Imager 6000. With the read buffer providing the appropriate chemical environment for ECL, when the plate is loaded into the instrument, a voltage is applied to the plate electrodes, causing the label bound to the electrode surface to emit light. The instrument measures the intensity of the emitted light to provide a quantitative measure of the amount of Pt present in the well.
Capture and detection antibody concentrations were optimized to minimize any non-specific binding to the negative control isolate which did not produce Pt. Signal that was produced by the negative control was comparable to background wells that contained PBS, instead of bacterial suspension.
Data analysis
We used GraphPad Prism, version 6.0 (GraphPad, California, USA), to perform data analysis of results collected from SECTOR Imager 6000. A Mixed ANOVA Model was applied to the ptxP1 vs. ptxP3 comparison to analyze the difference in Pt production between the two groups, considering variations across plates and days.
Assay specificity
To assess assay specificity, three additional Bordetella species that are known to not produce Pt, were tested for Pt production alongside the two B. pertussis Pt-negative isolates, I979 and J365. These included four isolates of B. bronchiseptica, five isolates of B. holmesii, and five isolates of B. parapertussis. Thirteen of the 14 isolates had a date of isolation known, which ranged from 2010–2015 and their states of origin included CT, MA, MN, and NY. The Pt-positive isolate, H921, and PBS were included as assay controls.
Assay reproducibility
To evaluate assay reproducibility, the Z’-factor statistical method was applied, which is commonly used to estimate reproducibility and robustness of screening assays. This parameter assesses, in part, assay quality by calculating separation between positive and negative signals. Calculated Z’-values between 1 and 0.5 refer to an excellent assay, while values between 0.5 and 0 indicate a marginal assay. The Z’-factor was calculated using the following formula [22]:
The Z-factor experiment was performed twice with positive and negative control isolates (H921 and FR3749, respectively) that were used throughout the assay development. In the first experiment, 80 positive and 16 negative control suspension replicates were tested. In the second experiment, 24 positive and 24 negative control isolates were tested.
Assay variability
Inter-plate and intra-plate variability was evaluated on 20 B. pertussis isolates. Isolates were prepared as described above and stored at 4°C for the duration of the study. Each prepared isolate was tested on five different days, with 10 replicates per plate. Four replicates of positive control isolate, H921, and four replicates of negative control isolate, FR3749, were included on each plate. Coefficients of variation were calculated for both intra- and inter-plate variability. Inter-plate variability was calculated using normalized results for each isolate by expressing isolate signal values as a fraction of the averaged positive control signal given from their respective plate. For intra-plate variability, unadjusted signal values were used to calculate variability between replicates for each isolate on a plate.
Sample stability
To determine sample stability post-lysis, a large batch of positive (H921) and negative (FR3749) isolate suspension controls were prepared and stored at 4°C for two months. Four replicates of each control isolate were included per plate and tested over a period of two months. In addition to the stability control suspension, freshly-prepared controls were also included, following the same number of passages as test isolates. For each control, the mean, standard deviation and coefficient of variation were calculated and the evaluated changes in signal strength over time were observed.
Assay validation
During assay validation, 344 B. pertussis isolates were screened for Pt production. Samples were prepared as described above and each isolate was tested in duplicate on the same plate. Positive (H921) and negative (FR3749) control replicates were included on each plate. Replicate signal values were averaged for each isolate and control. In order to compare the results between experiments, isolate signal values were expressed as a fraction of the positive control reference signal value.
ptxP1 vs. ptxP3 isolates comparison
The B. pertussis isolates used for this comparison consisted of 289 ptxP3 and 50 ptxP1 isolates that were randomly placed on the test plates. PtxP3 isolates were made up of either EPS 2012–2015 or CA 2010 and 2014 epidemics, while ptxP1 isolates ranged widely between years (1947–2013) and origin (18 states, the majority from MN (22%), CA (11%), and OR (11%)). Normalized signal values for both groups were used to compare the two populations for the differences in Pt signal levels. We applied T-test statistical analysis to determine if the two groups were different. In addition, a detailed comparison was performed of 10 ptxP1 and 10 ptxP3 that were collected in 2012 from MN. Only 10 ptxP1 were received by MN for that year, therefore, the 10 ptxP3 isolates were randomly selected from all those received in 2012. Five cellular preparations were made for each isolate and each preparation was run a total of five times (tested once/day) for a total of 25 measurements/isolate. The location of each preparation was randomly placed on the plate for each test.
Results
Inactivation of bacterial preparations
To comply with laboratory safety policies, several methods of bacterial inactivation were evaluated. Results of bacterial growth post-inactivation revealed that freeze-thaw and 15–30 minutes of UVC treatments were ineffective in inactivating the bacterial cells. UVC treatment for 45 minutes resulted in no bacterial growth, but was of very low throughput. No bacterial growth was also observed post-treatment with MicroChem-Plus, chlorhexidine and lysis buffer; therefore, cells inactivated by these methods were stained with a monoclonal antibody against Pt subunit 1 to verify epitope stability. Cell treatment with MicroChem-Plus and chlorhexidine lead to epitope destruction, with low to no signal; however, lysis buffer did not cause any changes in targeted epitope and produced a strong signal (data not shown). As a result, lysis buffer was selected as a method for bacterial inactivation. In order to improve assay signal-to-noise ratio, we evaluated the lysis buffer matrix effect and compared results collected from cells that were tested in lysis buffer to cells where lysis buffer was removed after lysis completion (data not shown). Removal of lysis buffer and re-suspension of cell pellet in PBS significantly improved signal-to noise ratio.
Assay specificity
Fourteen isolates, consisting of B. parapertussis, B. holmesii, and B. bronchiseptica that are most closely related to B. pertussis but do not produce Pt, were evaluated alongside B. pertussis Pt-negative isolates (Fig 1 and S1 File). These Bordetella spp. isolates produced signals similar to PBS and Pt-negative isolates compared to the positive control that gave >200-fold difference in signal. These results confirm that the assay is highly specific for identifying Pt production.
Assay reproducibility
To evaluate assay reproducibility, we applied the Z’-factor statistical method [22]. We calculated mean and standard deviations values for Pt positive and negative wells and used them to determine the Z’-factor value. The experiment was repeated and the averaged calculated Z’-factor of both experiments was 0.765 (standard deviation 0.021, percent coefficient of variation (%CV) was 2.77%), which falls within the range for a robust and reproducible assay.
Assay variability
Inter-plate variability was evaluated on 20 isolates in five different experiments (Table 1). The analysis showed that mean %CV was 11.5% (min-7.6%, max-14.7%, median-11.3%). The calculated intra-plate variability was 9.79% (min-3.35%, max-20.1%, median-9.28%).
Table 1. Variability between runs*.
Isolate | Mean FOC | %CV |
---|---|---|
I125 | 1.034 | 7.59 |
I149 | 1.118 | 10.47 |
I315 | 1.087 | 9.30 |
I327 | 1.121 | 12.74 |
I337 | 1.015 | 10.10 |
I338 | 0.828 | 10.00 |
I339 | 0.817 | 14.71 |
I340 | 0.817 | 14.71 |
I342 | 1.027 | 9.82 |
I343 | 1.056 | 11.45 |
I344 | 0.766 | 12.85 |
I347 | 1.226 | 10.51 |
I348 | 1.046 | 10.63 |
I359 | 1.107 | 12.27 |
I430 | 1.012 | 12.36 |
I434 | 1.111 | 11.05 |
I437 | 1.227 | 9.72 |
I746 | 0.751 | 14.57 |
I747 | 0.956 | 13.94 |
I748 | 1.005 | 11.66 |
*Assay variability between runs was evaluated on 20 B. pertussis isolates. Isolates were prepared as described above and stored at 4°C for the duration of the study. Each prepared isolate was tested on 5 different days, with 10 replicates per plate. Four replicates of positive control isolate (H921) was included on each plate. To normalize results for each isolate we averaged signal values for positive control on each plate and expressed isolate signal values as a fraction of a positive control signal. FOC = fraction of control.
Sample stability post-lysis and storage at 4°C
Signal stability over time was performed on a batch of positive and negative controls in a period of two months. Inactivated bacterial suspensions were stored at 4°C and included in experiments over a period of two months. We did not observe any changes in signal strength and the calculated %CV was 12%.
Assay validation
During assay validation, we screened 344 B. pertussis isolates (Fig 2 and S1 File). Out of 344 screened bacterial suspensions, only the two previously identified Pt-negative isolates (I979 and J365) were identified as negative for Pt production. The identification of isolate I979 and J365 as Pt-negative correlated with previous molecular sequencing results, western blot analysis, and genomic sequencing [15, 16]. Overall, the majority of isolates had Pt signal higher than selected positive control isolate (81.2%), and 8.7% isolates had signal lower than positive control. Thirty out of 344 isolates (8.7%) had signal similar to the selected positive control.
ptxP1 vs. ptxP3 comparison
We included a set of 50 ptxP1 isolates to be compared with 289 ptxP3 isolates for assessing a possible difference in Pt production levels (Fig 3 and S1 File). Normalized signal values for two groups were compared using unpaired two-tailed t-test analysis. Results showed that the two groups differed significantly with respect to Pt production (p value < 0.0001). Mean normalized signal value for ptxP3 isolates were 1.230 (SEM ±0.009601, n = 289) and for ptxP1 were 1.093 (SEM ±0.02286, n = 50).
To remove any potential bias as to year and origin of isolation, as well as any potential testing (cell preparation, plate, and day) bias, an additional experiment to compare a set of 10 ptxP1 and 10 ptxP3 isolates, from the same year and location, was performed. Multiple cellular preparations on multiple plates and days were tested and evaluated through a Mixed ANOVA Model used for analyzing the variance. The difference in mean signal values remained similar to the initial analysis (1.10 and 0.92 for ptxP3 and ptxP1 isolates, respectively) and that difference was still statistically significant (F = 49.52, P = 0.003) when considering day and plate as random effects. The results also indicated that the variance between days and plates was not statistically significant (P = 0.16 and P = 0.25, respectively).
Discussion
Through PCR and western blot analysis, circulating B. pertussis isolates have been identified to have recently gone through rapid, drastic genetic changes to eliminate the production of pertactin, one of the five immunogens that are included in the acellular pertussis vaccine [12]. This loss was likely a result of vaccine pressure from the first US cohort to have been solely vaccinated with the acellular vaccine as their primary series [13]. The question arose whether other vaccine antigens were also undergoing the same pressure. Recently, two double immunogen-deficient (Pt and Prn) isolates have been reported [16, 19].
Immunoassays are a convenient and inexpensive method for rapidly screening bacterial isolates for the production of vaccine antigens [14]. However, conventional ELISA-based assays require large sample volumes and are known to have high background and low dynamic range. In contrast, electrochemiluminescence-based immunoassays offer a more sensitive method, with little to no non-specific binding observed and broad dynamic range. In this paper, we describe the development and validation of a new Pt-screening immunoassay using the MSD platform. During assay development, two previously characterized B. pertussis isolates as positive (H921) and negative (FR3749) controls were used, based on their molecular characterization [12, 15]. During method development, the optimized assay conditions resulted in at least a 600-fold signal difference between positive and negative controls. Signal values from negative control were similar to the PBS background.
For assay validation, 344 B. pertussis isolates that were previously characterized by MLST [18, 23] were screened. The screening identified the two Pt-deficient isolates (I979 and J365) as Pt-negative, while all other isolates were Pt-positive. This finding correlates with MLST characterization. The signal level associated with Pt protein varied between isolates, and after normalization to positive control, 81.9% of isolates had Pt signal somewhat higher than positive control isolate (1.1–1.7 fold difference), and 9.3% of isolates had slightly lower levels of protein production (0.9–0.6 fold difference), showing that the selected positive control may lean more towards the lower end of the signal range. Although, the developed method was not intended to quantify Pt level production by different isolates, the variance in Pt-associated signal was noted.
In the Netherlands, a shift in the predominant MLST type for the ptxP allele from ptxP1 to ptxP3 was first observed in the mid-1990s alongside a significant increase in pertussis notifications; additionally, the authors observed a small, but statistically significant, difference in the in vitro production of Pt [11]. This shift from the genotype ptxP1 to ptxP3 has now been observed worldwide, including the US [23–25]. Interestingly, while this immunoassay was not meant to quantify Pt production differences, our results from multiple analyses did demonstrate that this immunoassay was sensitive enough to detect a slightly higher, statistically significant, level of Pt production from ptxP3 isolates than ptxP1 isolates.
The ECL technology on the MSD platform proved to be a reliable, sensitive, and specific method for the screening of B. pertussis isolates for pertussis toxin production. This technology allows screening of multiple targets in the same sample, which provides significant savings in cost and time. Future work includes the development of assay conditions for detection of other B. pertussis pathogenic factors, like pertactin, filamentous hemagglutinin, and fimbriae 2 and 3, which will be multiplexed together in a new screening B. pertussis immunoassay.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge the following colleagues and state health laboratories for contributing isolates used in this study: Jennifer Zipprich, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Minnesota, New Mexico, New York, and Oregon. We also want to thank Pamela Cassiday and Christine Miner for their assistance with the cellular preparations and strain selection, and Pengbo Liu and Nong Shang for their statistical review and guidance. The Pertussis Working Group consists of Kelly Pung, Anthony Muyombwe, Karen Edge, Marianna Cavanaugh, and Elizabeth Nazarian.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
The authors received no specific funding for this work.
References
- 1.Clark TA, Messonnier NE, Hadler SC. Pertussis control: time for something new? Trends in microbiology. 2012;20(5):211–3. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2012.03.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Centers for Disease C, Prevention. Pertussis epidemic—Washington, 2012. MMWR Morbidity and mortality weekly report. 2012;61(28):517–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Winter K, Harriman K, Zipprich J, Schechter R, Talarico J, Watt J, et al. California pertussis epidemic, 2010. The Journal of pediatrics. 2012;161(6):1091–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.05.041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Misegades LK, Winter K, Harriman K, Talarico J, Messonnier NE, Clark TA, et al. Association of childhood pertussis with receipt of 5 doses of pertussis vaccine by time since last vaccine dose, California, 2010. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association. 2012;308(20):2126–32. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.14939 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Acosta AM, DeBolt C, Tasslimi A, Lewis M, Stewart LK, Misegades LK, et al. Tdap vaccine effectiveness in adolescents during the 2012 Washington State pertussis epidemic. Pediatrics. 2015;135(6):981–9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-3358 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mooi FR, VDM NA, De Melker HE. Pertussis resurgence: waning immunity and pathogen adaptation—two sides of the same coin. Epidemiology and infection. 2013:1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.de Gouw D, Hermans PW, Bootsma HJ, Zomer A, Heuvelman K, Diavatopoulos DA, et al. Differentially expressed genes in Bordetella pertussis strains belonging to a lineage which recently spread globally. PloS one. 2014;9(1):e84523 PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3885589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084523 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.King AJ, van der Lee S, Mohangoo A, van Gent M, van der Ark A, van de Waterbeemd B. Genome-wide gene expression analysis of Bordetella pertussis isolates associated with a resurgence in pertussis: elucidation of factors involved in the increased fitness of epidemic strains. PloS one. 2013;8(6):e66150 PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3679012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Safarchi A, Octavia S, Luu LD, Tay CY, Sintchenko V, Wood N, et al. Better colonisation of newly emerged Bordetella pertussis in the co-infection mouse model study. Vaccine. 2016;34(34):3967–71. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.06.052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Clarke M, McIntyre PB, Blyth CC, Wood N, Octavia S, Sintchenko V, et al. The relationship between Bordetella pertussis genotype and clinical severity in Australian children with pertussis. J Infect. 2016;72(2):171–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2015.11.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mooi FR, van Loo IH, van Gent M, He Q, Bart MJ, Heuvelman KJ, et al. Bordetella pertussis strains with increased toxin production associated with pertussis resurgence. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15(8):1206–13. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2815961. doi: 10.3201/eid1508.081511 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pawloski LC, Queenan AM, Cassiday PK, Lynch AS, Harrison MJ, Shang W, et al. Prevalence and Molecular Characterization of Pertactin-Deficient Bordetella pertussis in the United States. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology. 2014;21(2):119–25. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00717-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Martin SW, Pawloski L, Williams M, Weening K, DeBolt C, Qin X, et al. Pertactin-negative Bordetella pertussis strains: evidence for a possible selective advantage. Clinical infectious diseases: an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2015;60(2):223–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Barkoff AM, Guiso N, Guillot S, Xing D, Markey K, Berbers G, et al. A rapid ELISA-based method for screening Bordetella pertussis strain production of antigens included in current acellular pertussis vaccines. Journal of immunological methods. 2014;408:142–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2014.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bouchez V, Brun D, Cantinelli T, Dore G, Njamkepo E, Guiso N. First report and detailed characterization of B. pertussis isolates not expressing Pertussis Toxin or Pertactin. Vaccine. 2009;27(43):6034–41. Epub 2009/08/12. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.07.074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Williams MM, Sen K, Weigand MR, Skoff TH, Cunningham VA, Halse TA, et al. Bordetella pertussis Strain Lacking Pertactin and Pertussis Toxin. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22(2):319–22. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4734536. doi: 10.3201/eid2202.151332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Winter K, Glaser C, Watt J, Harriman K, Centers for Disease C, Prevention. Pertussis epidemic—California, 2014. MMWR Morbidity and mortality weekly report. 2014;63(48):1129–32. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bowden KE, Williams MM, Cassiday PK, Milton A, Pawloski L, Harrison M, et al. Molecular epidemiology of the pertussis epidemic in Washington State in 2012. Journal of clinical microbiology. 2014;52(10):3549–57. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4187741. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01189-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pawloski L, Harrison, M., Chesnokova, M., Peng, Y., Weigand, M., Qin, X., DeBolt, C., Ju, H., Miner, C., Tondella, M.L. Identification and Characterization of Vaccine Immunogen-deficient Bordetella pertussis Isolates in the United States. 11th International Bordetella Symposium; Buenos Aires, Argentina2016.
- 20.Sato H, Sato Y. Protective activities in mice of monoclonal antibodies against pertussis toxin. Infection and immunity. 1990;58(10):3369–74. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC313662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sato H, Sato Y, Ohishi I. Comparison of pertussis toxin (PT)-neutralizing activities and mouse-protective activities of anti-PT mouse monoclonal antibodies. Infection and immunity. 1991;59(10):3832–5. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC258960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhang JH, Chung TD, Oldenburg KR. A Simple Statistical Parameter for Use in Evaluation and Validation of High Throughput Screening Assays. Journal of biomolecular screening. 1999;4(2):67–73. doi: 10.1177/108705719900400206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Schmidtke AJ, Boney KO, Martin SW, Skoff TH, Tondella ML, Tatti KM. Population diversity among Bordetella pertussis isolates, United States, 1935–2009. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18(8):1248–55. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3414039. doi: 10.3201/eid1808.120082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bart MJ, Harris SR, Advani A, Arakawa Y, Bottero D, Bouchez V, et al. Global population structure and evolution of Bordetella pertussis and their relationship with vaccination. MBio. 2014;5(2):e01074 PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3994516. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01074-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Weigand MR, Peng Y, Loparev V, Batra D, Bowden KE, Burroughs M, et al. The History of Bordetella pertussis Genome Evolution Includes Structural Rearrangement. J Bacteriol. 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.