Skip to main content
PMC home page
Cell Death & Disease logoLink to Cell Death & Disease
. 2017 Feb 9;8(2):e2603. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2016.352

MCM7 promotes cancer progression through cyclin D1-dependent signaling and serves as a prognostic marker for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Kai Qu 1,6, Zhixin Wang 1,2,6, Haining Fan 2,6, Juan Li 3, Jie Liu 3, Pingping Li 3, Zheyong Liang 3, Hongli An 3, Yina Jiang 4, Qiushi Lin 5, Xiaoqun Dong 5,*, Peijun Liu 3,*, Chang Liu 1,*
PMCID: PMC5386449  PMID: 28182015

Abstract

DNA replication is a central procedure of cell proliferation, whereas aberrant DNA replication is indicated to be a driving force of oncogenesis. Minichromosome maintenance complex component 7 (MCM7) plays an essential role in initiating DNA replication. To investigate the potential oncogenic properties and prognostic value of MCM7 in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), we conducted immunohistochemistry staining of MCM7 in 153 HCC samples and found that MCM7 high expression level was associated with worse overall survival (OS) of HCC patients. Mechanistically, knockdown of MCM7 significantly inhibited cellular proliferation in vitro and HCC tumorigenicity in vivo. Cyclin D1 was proved to be regulated by MCM7–MAPK signaling pathway. Clinically, high expression of both MCM7 and cyclin D1 exhibited a relatively high sensitivity and specificity to predict worse outcome of HCC patients. Taken together, our results suggest that MCM7–cyclin D1 pathway may participate in cancer progression and serve as a biomarker for prognosis in HCC.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide, and patient population in China alone accounts for more than half of the total cases mainly because of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.1, 2 As one of the leading causes of mortality, HCC is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage and the patients would die of the disease within several months.3 Despite improvements in surgical techniques and standard-of-care treatments, the prognosis of HCC remains very poor.4, 5 Traditional clinicopathological features such as tumor stage, histological grade and serum α-fetoprotein (AFP) level seem to insufficiently predict clinical outcome in HCC patients.6 Therefore, a thorough understanding of the underlying mechanisms regarding tumor progression is critical for identifying novel discriminatory biomarkers and developing effective therapeutic targets for HCC patients.

Enabling replicative immortality, as an important hallmark of cancer cells,7, 8 requires unlimited potential in DNA replication. At the initiation stage of this process, the minichromosome maintenance (MCM) complex is considered as a critical first step of formation of pre-replication complex that melts origin DNA and unwinds replication forks.9, 10 In almost all eukaryotes, the MCM complex is composed of six highly conserved MCM proteins, namely MCM2–7 (minichromosome maintenance complex components 2–7).11 Several MCM proteins are recently found to be tightly associated with tumorigenesis.12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 Among of them, MCM7, an important subunit of the presumed heteromeric MCM helicase, is reported to be involved in tumor formation and progression, and is considered as a potential biomarker in a variety of human malignancies.17, 18, 20, 21 In HCC, elevated expression of MCM7 was found in nearly half of tumor samples, and significantly correlated with intrahepatic metastasis and vascular invasion.20 In addition, MCM7 expression was also observed to be inhibited by sorafenib and other anti-HCC therapies.20, 22, 23 Although accumulating evidence has suggested a critical role of MCM7 in liver carcinogenesis, the molecular mechanisms underlying pro-HCC functions and prognostic implication of MCM7 remain to be elucidated.

The present study aims to demonstrate whether MCM7 plays a key role in promoting HCC progression and to explore underlying molecular mechanisms. Furthermore, we are also interested in evaluating the prognostic and predictive values of MCM7 along with its downstream signaling molecules in HCC patients.

Results

Overexpressed MCM7 is associated with more aggressive malignant characteristics of HCC tumors

Exploration using publicly available data sets (http://kmplot.com/analysis/) suggested that higher MCM7 mRNA expression was significantly correlated with a worse overall survival (OS) time in breast, gastric and lung cancer patients (all P<0.01, Supplementary Figure S1). To gain insight into the clinical signature of MCM7 in HCC, we examined the expression levels of MCM7 in 153 paired HCC tumor tissues and adjacent normal liver samples by immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining. As shown in Figure 1a, positive staining of MCM7 was very frequently seen in the nuclei of the HCC cells. In contrast, very few positive cells were detected in their paired nontumor tissues. The IHC index of MCM7 in HCC tumor tissues is much higher than nontumor tissues (P<0.05, Figure 1b), suggesting that MCM7 is mainly overexpressed in HCC. To explore the association between MCM7 expression level and clinicopathological features of HCC, we dichotomized 153 HCC patients into two subgroups, namely MCM7low and MCM7high. Subjects were considered as MCM7low if their IHC index of MCM7 was within the range of 1 to 6, and MCM7high if the IHC index was between 7 and 12. As shown in Figure 1c, higher MCM7 expression was found to be associated with more aggressive malignant characteristics, such as poorer tumor differentiation (P=0.001), higher frequency of vein invasion (P=0.015) and more advanced tumor stage (TNM staging: P<0.001 and BCLC staging: P=0.026).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

MCM7 was overexpressed in HCC and association with patients' survival. (a) Representative IHC staining images of MCM7 expression in human HCC and nontumor tissues, bar=100 μm. (b) The IHC index of MCM7 in HCC and nontumor tissues. (c) Association between MCM7 expression and clinicopathological variables in HCC patients. (d and e) The cumulative overall survival differences between patients with high and low MCM7 expression in all patients (d) and different subgroups (e). *P<0.05

Higher MCM7 expression is associated with worse survival in HCC patients

Next, we performed univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses to assess the individual and incremental prognostic values of both MCM7 and clinicopathological parameters in HCC patients (Supplementary Table S1). In addition to the classical clinical prognostic factors, MCM7 expression was an independent factor affecting patients' survival in HCC (HR (95% CI): 1.64 (1.07–2.51), P=0.023) (Supplementary Table S1). We further investigated the influence of MCM7 expression level on OS time using Kaplan–Meier method. We found that the HCC patients with higher MCM7 expression always had shorter median OS as compared with those with lower MCM7 expression (log rank P=0.020, Figure 1d).

Similarly, consistent association between MCM7 expression level and clinical outcome was observed in HCC patients who were stratified by demographic and clinicopathological characteristics. Interestingly, the death risk of low MCM7 expression on OS was found to be smaller in those HCC patients with less malignant characteristics, such as low AFP level (< 200 ng/ml), small tumor size, single tumor number and early BCLC stage (all P⩽0.036, Table 1). Kaplan–Meier analysis further confirmed a long median OS time in those patients with low MCM7 expression in the above-mentioned stratified subgroups (all P⩽0.018, Figure 1e).

Table 1. Stratified analysis on the association between MCM7 expression and overall survival of HCC patients.

Variable Total number MCM7high
 MCM7low
 HR (95% CI)a P-valuea
    Case number MST (month) Case number MST (month)    
Overall 153 74 26.0 79 46.0 1.64 (1.07–2.51) 0.023
Age (years)
 ⩽55 93 41 26.0 52 38.0 1.44 (0.84–2.48) 0.182
 >55 60 33 28.0 27 >63.0 2.00 (0.97–4.13) 0.062
               
Gender
 Male 101 51 22.0 50 >63.0 1.87 (1.07–3.29) 0.029
 Female 52 23 29.0 29 38.0 1.47 (0.75–2.86) 0.264
               
Hepatitis virus infection
 Negative 43 21 34.0 22 >63.0 2.40 (0.90–6.42) 0.08
 Positive 110 53 20.0 57 38.0 1.53 (0.94–2.46) 0.084
               
Cirrhosis
 Absent 55 25 49.0 30 >62.0 1.48 (0.64–3.43) 0.361
 Present 98 49 15.0 49 37.0 1.74 (1.06–2.87) 0.028
               
Child–Pugh score
 A+B 142 69 28.0 73 48.0 1.62 (1.03–2.54) 0.035
 C 11 5 17.0 6 29.0 2.93 (0.63–13.71) 0.173
               
Serum AFP level (ng/ml)
 <200 76 35 32.0 41 52.0 2.46 (1.23–4.92) 0.011
 ⩾200 77 39 15.0 38 25.0 1.22 (0.71–2.11) 0.468
               
Tumor size (cm)
 ⩽5 99 45 29.0 54 >63.0 1.98 (1.11–3.54) 0.021
 > 5 54 29 18.0 25 26.0 1.08 (0.57–2.04) 0.823
               
Tumor number
 Single 103 45 26.0 58 39.0 1.84 (1.08–3.13) 0.024
 Multiple (⩾2) 50 29 31.0 21 41.0 1.25 (0.60–2.58) 0.550
               
Capsule integrity
 Yes 70 35 26.0 35 46.0 1.74 (0.94–3.24) 0.078
 No 83 39 27.0 44 39.0 1.51 (0.84–2.73) 0.173
               
Venous invasion
 Negative 111 47 28.0 64 >63.0 1.92 (1.14–3.25) 0.015
 Positive 42 27 10.0 15 18.0 0.44 (0.35–1.57) 0.440
               
Differentiation
 Edmonson I–II 82 31 52.0 51 >63.0 1.65 (0.83-3.29) 0.152
 Edmonson III–IV 71 43 22.0 28 27.0 1.16 (0.66–2.02) 0.609
               
TNM stage
 I+II 112 48 28.0 64 >63.0 1.77 (1.04–3.00) 0.036
 III 41 26 13.0 15 23.0 0.91 (0.43–1.92) 0.808
               
BCLC stage
 A–B 106 46 28.0 60 >63.0 2.03 (1.18–3.47) 0.010
 C 47 28 18.0 19 16.0 0.84 (0.42–1.71) 0.632
Open in a new tab

Abbreviations: BCLC, Barcelona clinic liver cancer; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; MST, median survival time

a

HR and P-value were derived from univariate analysis. The significant P-values (<0.05) are in bold

Downregulation of MCM7 suppresses HCC cell proliferation in vitro

To further explore the molecular mechanisms underlying tumor suppression induced by low MCM7 expression in HCC, MCM7 knockdown in two HCC cell lines, HepG2 and SMMC-7721, was conducted using lentiviral vector transduction system (Lv-shRNA-MCM7 and Lv-shRNA-Control). Our data showed that downregulation of MCM7 significantly suppressed cell viability in HepG2 and SMMC-7721 cells (Figure 2a). In addition, the observation from colony formation assay also confirmed the suppression of cell growth in HCC cells with MCM7 downregulation (Figures 2b and c). Furthermore, we performed Annexin V-FITC/PI flow cytometry to assess the effect of MCM7 downregulation on tumor cell apoptosis. The results revealed a significant induction of both early and late phases of apoptosis in HCC cells with MCM7 downregulation (Figures 2d and e).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Knockdown of MCM7 inhibited proliferation of HCC cells. (a) MTT assay of HCC cells transfected by Lv-shRNA-MCM7 or Lv-shRNA-Control. (b and c) Colony-forming ability of HCC cells transfected by Lv-shRNA-MCM7 or Lv-shRNA-Control. (d and e) Flow cytometry analysis for apoptosis in HCC cells after 72 h of transduction. Data are represented as mean±S.E.M. from three independent experiments. *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001

Downregulation of MCM7 restrains cell cycle progression mainly by suppressing cyclin D1 expression

The essential role of MCM7 in DNA replication has been demonstrated by previous studies.11 However, the effect of MCM7 modulation on cell cycle in HCC cells has rarely been addressed. In the present study, we detected cell cycle status in HCC cells with MCM7 downregulation by flow cytometric assay. As shown in Figures 3a and b, the percentage of G0/G1 phase was significantly increased in Lv-shRNA-MCM7-transfected cells as compared with empty vector (Lv-shRNA-Control)-transfected cells. These results suggested that inhibition of MCM7 restrained cell cycle progression and mainly induced G1 arrest in HCC cells.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Downregulation of MCM7 restrains cell cycle progression by suppressing cyclin D1 expression. (a and b) Cell cycle analysis of HCC cells transfected by Lv-shRNA-MCM7 or Lv-shRNA-Control. (c) A total of 16 cell cycle-related genes were screened after lentiviral vector transduction. (d) Western blot analysis of cyclin D1, CDK4, p27, p21, total RB and p-RB in HCC cells after lentiviral vector transduction. Data are represented as mean±S.E.M. from three independent experiments. *P<0.05; **P<0.01

It is well known that numerous cell cycle genes are involved in regulation of G1/S transition.24 To find out the regulatory pathway that is affected by MCM7 and consequently causes G1 arrest, we screened gene expression profile including 16 G1/S-regulatory genes using the real-time reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) measurement. The expression of cyclin D1 (CCND1) was shown to decrease at approximately twofold in HCC cells with MCM7 downregulation (Figure 3c). In addition, several downstream molecules of cyclin D1, such as cyclin D-dependent kinase CDK6 and CDK4, as well as transcription factor E2F1,25 were also affected by MCM7 downregulation (Figure 3c). Western blot assay further confirmed the decreased levels of cyclin D1 and its downstream molecules CDK4 and phosphorylated retinoblastoma protein RB (pRB) in Lv-shRNA-MCM7-transfected cells (Figure 3d). Meanwhile, the cyclin D1 inhibitors, p21 and p27, were shown to be upregulated by MCM7 downregulation (Figure 3d), suggesting a critical role of cyclin D1 in MCM7-mediated cell cycle progression.

Knockdown of MCM7 downregulates cyclin D1 expression via suppressing MAPK signaling activity

MAPK signaling pathway is known as one of the most common cellular signal transduction pathways involved in both physiologic processes and carcinogenesis. It has been reported that MAPK signaling activation can alter transcription of genes important in cell cycle, among which is cyclin D1.26 Therefore, to further investigate the function of MAPK signaling in MCM7–cyclin D1 pathway, we computed the correlation between MCM7, CCND1 and MAPK-encoding genes using public microarray data (GSE21955). First, these data confirmed a significant positive correlation between the expression level of MCM7 and CCND1 in HCC cell lines (r2=0.479, P=0.018, Figure 4a). Second, the MCM7 expression was shown to be correlated with almost all 11 MAPK-encoding genes (Figure 4b), suggesting a potential regulatory relationship between MCM7 and MAPK signaling pathway. To test our hypothesis, we screened the changes in the expression profiling of MAPK-encoding genes in MCM7-knockdown HCC cells. Our data showed that the expression of extracellular regulated kinase 2 (ERK2), ERK3, ERK4, ERK7, c-Jun N-terminal kinase 1 (JNK1), JNK3 and p38gamma were suppressed by MCM7 downregulation in both HepG2 and SMMC-7721 cells (Figure 4c). In addition, the result of western blot assay confirmed that MCM7 downregulation significantly suppressed the levels of phosphorylated-ERK (p-ERK), p-JNK and p-p38 (Figures 4d and e).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

MAPK signaling participated in regulating the MCM7–cyclin D1 signaling in HCC cells. (a) Correlation of MCM7 with CCND1 gene expression in three HCC cell lines. (b) Correlation of MCM7 with 12 MAPK pathway member gene expression. (c) Heat map of changes in the expression of 12 MAPK pathway member genes after lentiviral vector transduction. Western blot analysis (d) and corresponding bar graphs (e) validated the alteration in the activity of three major MAPK members (ERK, JNK and p38) in HCC cells. (f) Correlation of CCND1 with 12 MAPK pathway member gene expression. (g) Heat map of changes in the expression of CCND1 after pretreatment with SB203580 (p38 inhibitor) or U0126 (ERK inhibitor) at different time points (3, 6, 12 and 24 h).; (h) Western blot analysis for cyclin D1 expression level in HCC cells pretreated with SB203580 (for 6 h) or U0126 (for 24 h). Data are represented as mean±S.E.M. from three independent experiments. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001

When computing the correlation between CCND1 and MAPK-encoding genes, we found that the expression of CCND1 was mainly associated with genes encoding ERK and p38, but not JNK (Figure 4f). After being treated with specific inhibitors that target ERK (U0126) and p38 (SB203580), cyclin D1 expression exhibited an approximately twofold decrease either in quiescent state or in platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-induced MAPK activation state (Figures 4g and h). It should be noted that the peak inhibitory effect of p38 inhibitor (SB203580) on cyclin D1 expression was reached at 6 h, whereas ERK inhibitor (U0126) treatment resulted in a delayed inhibitory effect (at 24 h) on cyclin D1 expression in HCC cell lines (Figure 4g).

Inhibitory effect of MCM7 knockdown on HCC tumorigenicity in vivo

MCM7 knockdown significantly inhibited cell proliferation via suppressing cyclin D1 expression in HCC cell lines, suggesting that MCM7 might be a potential therapeutic target for HCC. In this aspect, we further evaluated the anti-HCC effect of MCM7 knockdown in a xenograft mouse model. Nude mice were implanted subcutaneously with HCC cells that were transfected with either Lv-shRNA-MCM7 or Lv-shRNA-Control, and tumor size was measured once per week for 5 weeks. We found that the tumor size in Lv-shRNA-MCM7 group was much smaller than that of Lv-shRNA-Control group (Figure 5a). A significant tumor growth delay was observed in Lv-shRNA-MCM7 group as compared with controls (Figure 5b). To verify the inhibition of tumor growth in vivo was caused by MCM7 knockdown, we further detected the expression of MCM7 and cyclin D1 in those xenograft tumors. Our results showed that the expression levels of MCM7 and cyclin D1 was significantly reduced in Lv-shRNA-MCM7 group as compared with controls, indicating the involvement of functional MCM7–cyclin D1 pathway in HCC tumorigenesis (Figure 5c).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Knockdown of MCM7 inhibited tumor growth in vivo. (a) Tumor nodules after subcutaneously inoculation of HCC cells transfected with Lv-shRNA-MCM7 or Lv-shRNA-Control for 4 weeks (n=5 for each group). (b) Xenograft tumor volume of different groups bearing HCC cells transfected with Lv-shRNA-MCM7 or Lv-shRNA-Control. (c) Representative IHC staining of MCM7 and Cyclin D1 in xenograft tumors of different groups. Bar=100 μm. *P<0.05, **P<0.01

Prognostic value of MCM7 and cyclin D1 in patients with HCC

The critical involvement of MCM7 and cyclin D1 in HCC pathology that was observed both in vivo and in vitro indicated that MCM7 and cyclin D1 might be potential prognostic biomarkers for HCC. To further evaluate their predictive values for patients' clinical outcome, the IHC assay on MCM7 and cyclin D1 was performed in 153 HCC patients. We found a significant positive correlation between MCM7 and cyclin D1 expression in HCC tumor tissues (Figures 6a and b) that confirmed the involvement of MCM7–cyclin D1 pathway in HCC. Compared with patients with both low MCM7 and low cyclin D1 expression, others were at a higher risk of death from HCC during the study (adjusted HR (95% CI): 2.57 (1.61–4.10), P<0.001) (Table 2 and Supplementary Table S2). Our data also demonstrated that the combination of MCM7 and cyclin D1 expression is a potential biomarker to predict mortality, having a relatively higher sensitivity (70.9%) than either MCM7 or cyclin D1 alone (Figure 6c). Based on the Kaplan–Meier survival curves, patients with MCM7low and cyclin D1low expression had a longer median OS time compared with those bearing either MCM7high or cyclin D1high expression (P<0.001, Figure 6d). In addition, combination of MCM7low and cyclin D1low expression was significantly associated with less aggressive characteristics, such as age ⩽55 years, AFP <200 ng/ml, Edmonson I–II, TNM stage I–II, BCLC stage A–B and negative venous invasion, suggesting that MCM7low and cyclin D1low expression can serve as novel biomarkers for HCC in relatively early-stage disease (Figure 6e).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

MCM7 and cyclin D1 served as potential biomarkers for prognosis of HCC. (a) Representative IHC staining of MCM7 and cyclin D1 in the same HCC tissue, bar=100 μm. (b) Linear correlation analysis of MCM7 and cyclin D1 expression in HCC tumor tissues. (c) Diagnostic test evaluations of either MCM7 or cyclin D1 alone or in combination in predicting the risk for patients' death. Prognostic value of combination of MCM7 and cyclin D1 in overall HCC patients (d) and different subgroups (e)

Table 2. Stratified7+cyclin D1 expression and overall survival of HCC patients.

Variable Total number MCM7highor cyclin D1high
 MCM7low and cyclin D1low
 HR (95% CI)a P-valuea
    Case number MST (month) Case number MST (month)    
Overall 153 87 25.0 66 >63.0 2.57 (1.61–4.10) <0.001
Age
 ⩽55 years 93 51 25.0 42 48.0 2.43 (1.36–4.33) 0.003
 > 55 years 60 36 24.0 24 >63.0 2.72 (1.22–6.06) 0.015
               
Gender
 Male 101 57 20.0 44 >63.0 2.70 (1.46–5.01) 0.002
 Female 52 30 26.0 22 46.0 2.61 (1.26–5.39) 0.01
               
Hepatitis virus infection
 Negative 43 23 31.0 20 >63.0 3.73 (1.23–11.36) 0.02
 Positive 110 64 17.0 46 46.0 2.37 (1.41–3.99) 0.001
               
Cirrhosis
 Absent 55 28 42.0 27 >62.0 2.45 (1.00–6.01) 0.051
 Present 98 59 15.0 39 48.0 2.54 (1.46–4.40) 0.001
               
Child–Pugh score
 A+B 142 80 26.0 62 >63.0 2.53 (1.55–4.12) <0.001
 C 11 7 18.0 4 46.0 4.84 (0.57–40.86) 0.147
Serum AFP level
 <200 ng/ml 76 37 31.0 39 >63.0 3.02 (1.47–6.23) 0.003
 ⩾200 ng/ml 77 50 13.0 27 37.0 1.95 (1.05–3.60) 0.034
               
Tumor size
 ⩽5 cm 99 50 28.0 49 >63.0 2.74 (1.49–5.05) 0.001
 >5 cm 54 37 17.0 17 30.0 1.86 (0.88–3.94) 0.105
               
Tumor number
 Single 103 56 24.0 47 >63.0 3.21 (1.77–5.83) <0.001
 Multiple (⩾2) 50 31 28.0 19 46.0 1.58 (0.74–3.38) 0.235
               
Capsule integrity
 Yes 70 40 24.0 30 >63.0 2.60 (1.33–5.11) 0.005
 No 83 47 25.0 36 48.0 2.47 (1.29–4.74) 0.006
               
Venous invasion
 Negative 111 53 28.0 58 >63.0 2.53 (1.47–4.36) 0.001
 Positive 42 34 13.0 8 16.0 1.61 (0.56–4.62) 0.375
               
Differentiation
 Edmonson I–II 82 34 32.0 48 >63.0 2.25 (1.13–4.48) 0.021
 Edmonson III–IV 71 53 22.0 18 37.0 1.82 (0.92–3.64) 0.088
               
TNM stage
 I+II 112 55 28.0 57 >63.0 2.53 (1.45–4.40) 0.001
 III 41 32 13.0 9 26.0 1.60 (0.61–4.19) 0.337
               
BCLC stage
 A–B 106 52 28.0 54 >63.0 2.71 (1.55–4.75) 0.001
 C 47 35 17.0 12 46.0 1.67 (0.69–4.06) 0.259
Open in a new tab

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; MST, median survival time

a

HR and P-value were derived from univariate analysis. The significant P-values (<0.05) are in bold

Discussion

In the present study, we found that high expression of MCM7 was associated with poor prognosis of the HCC patients. The upregulation of MCM7 enhanced the proliferation of HCC cells in vitro and tumorigenicity in vivo. Mechanistically, MCM7 upregulated cyclin D1 expression by modulating MAPK signaling pathway activity, thereby affecting cell cycle progression. Furthermore, a positive association between MCM7 and cyclin D1 expression was found in mouse model and human tumor tissues. Our data revealed that the combination of MCM7 and cyclin D1 had a highly prognostic value in HCC patients. Our studies presented robust evidence to support that MCM7 and its downstream target cyclin D1 are potential biomarkers for HCC prognosis.

Enabling replicative immortality is a hallmark of cancer.7, 8 DNA replication, the crucial central event during cell proliferation, is observed to be more pronounced in cancer cells than in normal cells. A number of proteins participating in DNA replication are abnormally expressed in cancer cells. For example, MCM7, a replication factor that binds to DNA double strand at replication origins in the late G1 phase and forms the pre-RC complex during cell cycle progression,27 is highly expressed in various cancers and can be used as a potential proliferation marker.17, 21, 28, 29 Zhou et al.20 reported that MCM7 was positive in 42 of 87 HCC tumors (48.2%) but negative in all noncancerous tissue. Consistently, we also observed that IHC index of MCM7 in HCC tumor was significantly higher than that in paired normal liver tissue. Although the positive immunostaining of MCM7 in cancer has been frequently observed, the oncogenic role of MCM7 in cancer development remains unclear. The first study on the molecular function of MCM7 was focused on genome analysis of prostate cancer.17 Researchers found that DNA copy number of MCM7 was increased several fold, and associated with prostate cancer relapse and metastasis. Subsequent studies have suggested that increases in MCM7 copy number and protein level were the driving force in skin and esophageal cancer models.12, 30 Liu et al.31 recently reported that knocking down of MCM7 inhibited proliferation and invasion of MHCC-97H cells (a HCC cell line with highly invasive potential). In this study, we further confirmed this result in both MCM7-knockdown HCC cells (HepG2 and SMMC-7721) and murine xenograft models. The mechanistic investigations revealed that knockdown of MCM7 resulted in the cell cycle arrest of HCC cells with the subsequent inhibition of tumor growth, suggesting that MCM7 might be a potential target for cancer therapy.

We identified cyclin D1 as a downstream target of MCM7 involved in cell cycle regulation. It has been widely accepted that cyclin D1 is a mitogenic sensor for the cell cycle machine and it also acts as an oncogene during cancer development.32 Overexpression of cyclin D1 and its accumulation in cancer cell nuclei can result from DNA damage and chromosomal abnormalities. Given the critical role of MCM7 in DNA replication licensing and causing chromosome instability,33 and the strong association between MCM7 and cyclin D1 expression in both human HCC tissue and murine xenograft tumor, it is reasonable to hypothesize that MCM7 acts as a regulator of cyclin D1. In fact, we previously reported that MCM7 depletion could prevent cyclin D1 expression in untransformed human dermal fibroblasts.34 In this study, as expected, we also found that knockdown of MCM7 significantly inhibited cyclin D1 expression in HCC cell lines, indicating an essential role of MCM7 in regulation of cell cycle.

Great efforts have been made over the past decade to explore the signaling pathways involved in the regulation of cyclin D1. The MAPK signaling pathway can induce multiple biologic events, such as cell proliferation, differentiation and survival, as well as stimulate cyclin D1 transcription in human cell lines.35 There are seven classes of MAPK signaling cascades, and three of them are essential for liver carcinogenesis, including ERK, JNK and p38 signaling cascades.36 Although Li et al.37 have observed simultaneous expression of MCM7, cyclin D1 and MAPKs in breast cancer cells, it was unclear whether MCM7 induced cyclin D1 expression through a MAPK-dependent mechanism in HCC. In the present study, inhibition of MCM7 expression suppressed the activities of all three MAPK signaling cascades. However, only two of them, ERK and p38, but not JNK signaling cascade, were found to be involved in the regulation of mitogen-induced cyclin D1 expression in HCC cells, consistent with previous studies.35, 38 A possible explanation for this observation is that JNK signaling cascade is generally responsible for the apoptotic response induced by DNA damage, but not the mitogen-induced cell proliferation.39 Taken together, the above evidence suggests that by activating MAPK pathways, especially the ERK and p38 signaling cascades, MCM7 may possess a significant role in the regulation of cyclin D1 and the subsequent cancer progression.

Accumulating evidence has supported MCM7 as a proliferation marker, comparable to the existing ones such as Ki-67 or proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in multiple malignancies, including lymphoma,14 colorectal cancer,15 ovary cancer,16 prostate cancer17 and lung cancer.18 Here we confirmed that MCM7 expression could be an independent survival predictor for HCC. The higher MCM7 protein level was correlated with a worse prognosis. Interestingly, we found a statistically significant association between them only in patients with early stage or less aggressive cancer. Recently, Liu et al.40 evaluated the prognostic values of MCM7 in 494 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). They found that patients with higher MCM7 expression level had a significant poorer OS compared with those with low MCM7 expression in early stages of NSCLC (P<0.00001). Similarly, Fujioka et al.41 also reported that MCM7 was related to poor prognosis in patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma. A possible explanation for above findings is that MCM7, as a regulator controlling when DNA replication can begin, contributes to oncogene-driven tumorigenesis.12 Altered expression of MCM7 is to be considered as an early event during tumorigenesis. Higher MCM7 expression is always associated with high proliferative capacity in the early stage of cancer.42 In contrast, in late-stage cancer patients, many confounding factors, including tumor size, vascular or lymphocyte invasion, can affect the prognostic values of MCM7 that might produce a nonsignificant result.

Considering the regulatory relationship between MCM7 and cyclin D1, we further studied the prognostic value of the combination of MCM7 and cyclin D1 in HCC patients. As expected, the prognostic sensitivity of the combination was higher than either MCM7 or cyclin D1 alone. The moderate sample size in our study limited the validity of some stratified analyses. Although the diagnostic power for MCM7 and cyclin D1 in combination is rather modest, our present study offers evidence for the future investigation of MCM7 and cyclin D1 as prognostic markers in HCC management. Therefore, a large prospective validation study needs to be performed before their application in the clinic.

In summary, MCM7, a key factor involved in DNA replication initiation, was shown to be overexpressed in mostly HCC tumors and significantly associated with a poor prognosis of HCC patients. Mechanistically, MCM7 promotes HCC cell proliferation via upregulating MAPK–cyclin D1 pathway both in vitro and in vivo. In addition, our study indicates a joint effect of MCM7–cyclin D1 molecular markers in predicting the prognosis of HCC patients. Our data also shed light on the potential of MCM7 as a therapeutic target for HCC.

Materials and Methods

Patients and tissue samples

A total of 153 patients, including 101 males and 52 females, with an average age of 53.5 years (range: 24–80 years) were consecutively enrolled in this study. The clinicopathological characteristics of patients, including age, gender, hepatitis virus infection status, cirrhosis, Child–Pugh score, serum AFP level, tumor size, tumor number, tumor differentiation grade, TNM stage, capsule integrity and venous invasion are summarized in Supplementary Table S3. This research was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) of First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University.

IHC assay

The expression levels of MCM7 or cyclin D1 in tissue samples were determined by using IHC assay. Briefly, tissue samples were fixed in 10% buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin and sectioned at 4 μm thickness. Sections were stained with antibodies as described in other study.43 The detailed protocols and scoring system are shown in Supplementary Materials and Methods.

Transduction of lentiviral vectors

Two HCC cell lines (HepG2 and SMMC-7721) were transfected using lentiviral vectors (Lv-shRNA-MCM7 and Lv-shRNA-Control) according to the manufacture's instruction (GenePharma Co., Shanghai, China). The detailed protocols are shown in Supplementary Materials and Methods.

Western blotting and qRT-PCR assays

The intercellular expression levels of genes and proteins were determined by using western blotting and qRT-PCR methods, respectively. The detailed protocols are provided in Supplementary Materials and Methods. The primers used in qRT-PCR assay are listed in Supplementary Table S4. Antibodies used in this study were listed in Supplementary Table S5.

MTT and colony formation assays

The in vitro cell proliferation of HCC cell lines was measured using the MTT method. Cell colony formation assay was used to assess the effect of MCM7 knockdown on the reproductive potential of HCC cells. The detailed protocols are provided in Supplementary Materials and Methods.

Cell cycle and apoptosis analysis

Cell cycle progression was determined by flow cytometry of propidium iodide (PI)-stained cells on a flow cytometer (FACS Calibur, BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Meanwhile, cell apoptosis was determined by flow cytometry of Annexin V-APC and PI (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA)-stained cells according to the manufacturer's instructions. The detailed protocols are provided in Supplementary Materials and Methods.

Tumorigenicity assay in vivo

The protocol of tumorigenicity assay in vivo was approved by the institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) at College of Medicine, Xi'an Jiao Tong University. The detailed protocols are provided in Supplementary Materials and Methods.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using PASW Statistics 19 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The detailed statistical methods used in this study are shown in Supplementary Materials and Methods. A P-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 81071876, 81472247 and 81201549); the Project of Innovative Research Team for Key Science and Technology in Xi'an Jiaotong University, the Program for Innovative Research Team of Shaanxi Province (grant number 2013KCJ-23); the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; and the Clinical Research Award of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, China (grant number XJTU1AF-CRF-2015-011).

Author contributions

PL and CL supervised the study; KQ, ZW, PL and CL designed the experiments; KQ, ZW, HF and XD developed methodology; ZW, HF, JL and YJ collected samples; ZW, JL, PL, ZL and HA carried out the experiments; KQ, HF, QL and XD performed data analysis; KQ, ZW and HF prepared the figures and tables; KQ, ZW, XD, PL and CL wrote and revised the manuscript. All the authors have reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Glossary

MCM7

minichromosome maintenance complex component 7

HCC

hepatocellular carcinoma

OS

overall survival

HBV

hepatitis B virus

AFP

α-fetoprotein

IHC

immunohistochemistry

qRT-PCR

quantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR

CCND1

cyclin D1

RB

retinoblastoma protein

ERK

extracellular regulated kinase

JNK1

c-Jun N-terminal kinase 1

PDGF

platelet-derived growth factor

PCNA

proliferating cell nuclear antigen

NSCLC

non-small-cell lung cancer

PI

propidium iodide

IACUC

institutional animal care and use committee

IRB

institutional review board

Footnotes

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on Cell Death and Disease website (http://www.nature.com/cddis)

Edited by A Oberst

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Figures
Click here for additional data file. (407KB, doc)
Supplementary Tables
Click here for additional data file. (244KB, doc)
Supplementary Methods
Click here for additional data file. (39.5KB, doc)

References

  1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011; 61: 69–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Nordenstedt H, White DL, El-Serag HB. The changing pattern of epidemiology in hepatocellular carcinoma. Dig Liver Dis 2010; 42(Suppl 3): S206–S214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics 2014CA: Cancer J Clin 2014; 64: 9–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bruix J, Gores GJ, Mazzaferro V. Hepatocellular carcinoma: clinical frontiers and perspectives. Gut 2014; 63: 844–855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Tang ZY, Ye SL, Liu YK, Qin LX, Sun HC, Ye QH et al. A decade's studies on metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2004; 130: 187–196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. European Association for the Study of the Liver, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Cancer 2012; 48: 599–641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 2000; 100: 57–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 2011; 144: 646–674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Labib K, Tercero JA, Diffley JF. Uninterrupted MCM2-7 function required for DNA replication fork progression. Science 2000; 288: 1643–1647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ibarra A, Schwob E, Mendez J. Excess MCM proteins protect human cells from replicative stress by licensing backup origins of replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105: 8956–8961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. You Z, Ishimi Y, Masai H, Hanaoka F. Roles of Mcm7 and Mcm4 subunits in the DNA helicase activity of the mouse Mcm4/6/7 complex. J Biol Chem 2002; 277: 42471–42479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Honeycutt KA, Chen Z, Koster MI, Miers M, Nuchtern J, Hicks J et al. Deregulated minichromosomal maintenance protein MCM7 contributes to oncogene driven tumorigenesis. Oncogene 2006; 25: 4027–4032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lau KM, Chan QK, Pang JC, Li KK, Yeung WW, Chung NY et al. Minichromosome maintenance proteins 2, 3 and 7 in medulloblastoma: overexpression and involvement in regulation of cell migration and invasion. Oncogene 2010; 29: 5475–5489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Marnerides A, Vassilakopoulos TP, Boltetsou E, Levidou G, Angelopoulou MK, Thymara I et al. Immunohistochemical expression and prognostic significance of CCND3, MCM2 and MCM7 in Hodgkin lymhoma. Anticancer Res 2011; 31: 3585–3594. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nishihara K, Shomori K, Fujioka S, Tokuyasu N, Inaba A, Osaki M et al. Minichromosome maintenance protein 7 in colorectal cancer: implication of prognostic significance. Int J Oncol 2008; 33: 245–251. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ota T, Clayton AC, Minot DM, Shridhar V, Hartmann LC, Gilks CB et al. Minichromosome maintenance protein 7 as a potential prognostic factor for progression-free survival in high-grade serous carcinomas of the ovary. Mod Pathol 2011; 24: 277–287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ren B, Yu G, Tseng GC, Cieply K, Gavel T, Nelson J et al. MCM7 amplification and overexpression are associated with prostate cancer progression. Oncogene 2006; 25: 1090–1098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Toyokawa G, Masuda K, Daigo Y, Cho HS, Yoshimatsu M, Takawa M et al. Minichromosome maintenance protein 7 is a potential therapeutic target in human cancer and a novel prognostic marker of non-small cell lung cancer. Mol Cancer 2011; 10: 65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tsai HY, Hsi BL, Hung IJ, Yang CP, Lin JN, Chen JC et al. Correlation of MYCN amplification with MCM7 protein expression in neuroblastomas: a chromogenic in situ hybridization study in paraffin sections. Hum Pathol 2004; 35: 1397–1403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhou YM, Zhang XF, Cao L, Li B, Sui CJ, Li YM et al. MCM7 expression predicts post-operative prognosis for hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int 2012; 32: 1505–1509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Facoetti A, Ranza E, Grecchi I, Benericetti E, Ceroni M, Morbini P et al. Immunohistochemical evaluation of minichromosome maintenance protein 7 in astrocytoma grading. Anticancer Res 2006; 26(5A): 3513–3516. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Yang H, Lan P, Hou Z, Guan Y, Zhang J, Xu W et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitor SAHA epigenetically regulates miR-17-92 cluster and MCM7 to upregulate MICA expression in hepatoma. Br J Cancer 2015; 112: 112–121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Bryant VL, Elias RM, McCarthy SM, Yeatman TJ, Alexandrow MG. Suppression of reserve MCM complexes chemosensitizes to gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil. Mol Cancer Res 2015; 13: 1296–1305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Bartek J, Lukas J. Pathways governing G1/S transition and their response to DNA damage. FEBS Lett 2001; 490: 117–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Jung JK, Arora P, Pagano JS, Jang KL. Expression of DNA methyltransferase 1 is activated by hepatitis B virus X protein via a regulatory circuit involving the p16INK4a-cyclin D1-CDK 4/6-pRb-E2F1 pathway. Cancer Res 2007; 67: 5771–5778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lavoie JN, L'Allemain G, Brunet A, Muller R, Pouyssegur J. Cyclin D1 expression is regulated positively by the p42/p44MAPK and negatively by the p38/HOGMAPK pathway. J Biol Chem 1996; 271: 20608–20616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Bell SP, Dutta A. DNA replication in eukaryotic cells. Annu Rev Biochem 2002; 71: 333–374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rahman KW, Li Y, Wang Z, Sarkar SH, Sarkar FH. Gene expression profiling revealed survivin as a target of 3, 3′-diindolylmethane-induced cell growth inhibition and apoptosis in breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 2006; 66: 4952–4960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Liontos M, Koutsami M, Sideridou M, Evangelou K, Kletsas D, Levy B et al. Deregulated overexpression of hCdt1 and hCdc6 promotes malignant behavior. Cancer Res 2007; 67: 10899–10909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kan T, Sato F, Ito T, Matsumura N, David S, Cheng Y et al. The miR-106b-25 polycistron, activated by genomic amplification, functions as an oncogene by suppressing p21 and Bim. Gastroenterology 2009; 136: 1689–1700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Liu Y, Liu WB, Liu KJ, Ao L, Cao J, Zhong JL et al. Extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields affect the miRNA-mediated regulation of signaling pathways in the GC-2 cell line. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0139949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Diehl JA. Cycling to cancer with cyclin D1. Cancer Biol Ther 2002; 1: 226–231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Orr SJ, Gaymes T, Ladon D, Chronis C, Czepulkowski B, Wang R et al. Reducing MCM levels in human primary T cells during the G(0)—>G(1) transition causes genomic instability during the first cell cycle. Oncogene 2010; 29: 3803–3814 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Liu P, Slater DM, Lenburg M, Nevis K, Cook JG, Vaziri C. Replication licensing promotes cyclin D1 expression and G1 progression in untransformed human cells. Cell Cycle 2009; 8: 125–136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Weber JD, Raben DM, Phillips PJ, Baldassare JJ. Sustained activation of extracellular-signal-regulated kinase 1 (ERK1) is required for the continued expression of cyclin D1 in G1 phase. Biochem J 1997; 326(Pt 1): 61–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Min L, He B, Hui L. Mitogen-activated protein kinases in hepatocellular carcinoma development. Semin Cancer Biol 2011; 21: 10–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Li X, Wang K, Ren Y, Zhang L, Tang XJ, Zhang HM et al. MAPK signaling mediates sinomenine hydrochloride-induced human breast cancer cell death via both reactive oxygen species-dependent and -independent pathways: an in vitro and in vivo study. Cell Death Dis 2014; 5: e1356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Recio JA, Merlino G. Hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor activates proliferation in melanoma cells through p38 MAPK, ATF-2 and cyclin D1. Oncogene 2002; 21: 1000–1008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Shen HM, Liu ZG. JNK signaling pathway is a key modulator in cell death mediated by reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. Free Radic Biol Med 2006; 40: 928–939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Liu YZ, Jiang YY, Hao JJ, Lu SS, Zhang TT, Shang L et al. Prognostic significance of MCM7 expression in the bronchial brushings of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Lung Cancer 2012; 77: 176–182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Fujioka S, Shomori K, Nishihara K, Yamaga K, Nosaka K, Araki K et al. Expression of minichromosome maintenance 7 (MCM7) in small lung adenocarcinomas (pT1): Prognostic implication. Lung Cancer 2009; 65: 223–229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Bonome T, Lee JY, Park DC, Radonovich M, Pise-Masison C, Brady J et al. Expression profiling of serous low malignant potential, low-grade, and high-grade tumors of the ovary. Cancer Res 2005; 65: 10602–10612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Qu K, Xu X, Liu C, Wu Q, Wei J, Meng F et al. Negative regulation of transcription factor FoxM1 by p53 enhances oxaliplatin-induced senescence in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Lett 2013; 331: 105–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figures
Click here for additional data file. (407KB, doc)
Supplementary Tables
Click here for additional data file. (244KB, doc)
Supplementary Methods
Click here for additional data file. (39.5KB, doc)

Articles from Cell Death & Disease are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES