Skip to main content
Frontiers in Plant Science logoLink to Frontiers in Plant Science
. 2017 Apr 13;8:579. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00579

Development of Molecular Markers for Iron Metabolism Related Genes in Lentil and Their Expression Analysis under Excess Iron Stress

Debjyoti Sen Gupta 1,2,*, Kevin McPhee 1,*, Shiv Kumar 3
PMCID: PMC5390492  PMID: 28450880

Abstract

Multiple genes and transcription factors are involved in the uptake and translocation of iron in plants from soil. The sequence information about iron uptake and translocation related genes is largely unknown in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.). This study was designed to develop iron metabolism related molecular markers for Ferritin-1, BHLH-1 (Basic helix loop helix), or FER-like transcription factor protein and IRT-1 (Iron related transporter) genes using genome synteny with barrel medic (Medicago truncatula). The second objective of this study was to analyze differential gene expression under excess iron over time (2 h, 8 h, 24 h). Specific molecular markers were developed for iron metabolism related genes (Ferritin-1, BHLH-1, IRT-1) and validated in lentil. Gene specific markers for Ferritin-1 and IRT-1 were used for quantitative PCR (qPCR) studies based on their amplification efficiency. Significant differential expression of Ferritin-1 and IRT-1 was observed under excess iron conditions through qPCR based gene expression analysis. Regulation of iron uptake and translocation in lentil needs further characterization. Greater emphasis should be given to development of conditions simulating field conditions under external iron supply and considering adult plant physiology.

Keywords: lentil, gene expression, iron metabolism, qPCR expression analysis, molecular marker, ferritin

Introduction

Iron (Fe) uptake in plants is a complex physiological process governed by homeostatic mechanisms in the plant. Homeostatic mechanisms involve absorption, translocation and redistribution of Fe within the plant system at a particular concentration (10-9–10-4 mol/l) (Römheld and Schaaf, 2004). Lower iron concentration leads to Fe-deficiency symptoms including chlorosis and necrosis in leaves and ultimately loss in biomass as well as grain yield. Higher concentrations of Fe within the plant system results in generation of free radical species which damage various cellular components by interacting with protein, lipid, carbohydrates and even with DNA. According to Welch and Graham (2004), there are four different barriers controlling homeostatic mechanisms of mineral uptake in plants; (A) the root-soil interphase known as the rhizosphere, (B) root-cell plasma membrane, (C) translocation to edible plant organs (grains/tubers), and (D) bioavailability of minerals.

Ferritin is an iron-carrying protein in plants and has a multimeric (24-mer) cage-like structure that carries up to 4500 atoms of Fe within its core (Crichton et al., 1978; Wade et al., 1993). The ferritin protein is highly conserved within the animal and plant kingdom (Ragland et al., 1990). Ferritin meets the metabolic need for iron when required by the metabolome as well as prevents any kind of oxidative stress (Harrison et al., 1998). Plant ferritin subunit sequences share between 39 and 49% similarity with mammalian ferritin sequences (Briat et al., 2009). This similarity increases when comparisons are made within the plant kingdom or among close plant families. Iron homeostasis is important due to the minute balance that exists between iron deficiency and toxicity and that affects plant physiology. Impaired plant physiology ultimately affects crop yield. Ferritin regulates iron homeostasis to prevent interaction of iron with other cellular components which may result in generation of free radicals during oxidative stress. In plants, ferritin consists of a single kind of subunit and ferritin bound Fe is highly bioavailable (Kalgaonkar and Lonnerdal, 2008).

Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) is a eudicot plant and uses strategy I where ferric iron is reduced at the rhizosphere and absorbed as ferrous iron by the root. Monocot plants use a different strategy to uptake iron from the soil (strategy II). The uptake of iron is mediated through phytosiderophores and the ferric iron enters the plant system through root in case of monocot plants (strategy II). In Arabidopsis thaliana, reduction of ferric Fe is accomplished by Fe reductase FRO2 (ferric reductase oxidase-2; Robinson et al., 1999). This was the first report of cloning and gene function elucidation of any major iron metabolism related gene in plants. Uptake of ferrous Fe into the root is carried out by the metal transporter IRT1 (iron-regulated transporter; Eide et al., 1996; Vert et al., 2002). The basic helix-loop-helix (BHLH) transcription factor family in plants is a ubiquitous regulator and is highly conserved, regulating different types of genes during transcription (Heim et al., 2003). The BHLH transcription factor or FIT (FER-like Fe deficiency-induced transcription factor) is reported to be responsible for high-level expression of FRO2 and IRT-1 (Colangelo and Guerinot, 2004; Jakoby et al., 2004; Yuan et al., 2005). It is pertinent to mention that iron uptake, translocation and storage is a complex pathway and multiple genes or gene families are involved. However, from crop breeding point of view breeders always need a high-throughput and less time consuming techniques to identify few potential genotypes in a large set of germplasms. These three genes were targeted in lentil with a long-term objective in mind to develop an assay to find lentil genotypes which better perform under excess iron supply. The results of this experiment would give an initial thrust to such objectivities in lentil where limited amount of sequence information is available till date.

Development of gene specific markers and their utilization in understanding metabolic pathways are important genomic goals to achieve in any crop species for their effective utilization in genetic studies or molecular breeding applications per se. Availability of specific DNA markers for iron metabolism related genes in lentil are not available. The objectives of the study were to, (1) develop gene (Ferritin-1, BHLH-1, and IRT-1) specific molecular markers in lentil and (2) analyze their gene expression under excess iron over time.

Materials and Methods

Plant Materials and Treatments

‘CDC Redberry’ (Vandenberg et al., 2006) seedlings were raised in the laboratory and fresh tissue was collected for DNA and RNA extraction. Seeds were germinated on wet filter paper in an incubator maintained at 25°C. Seedlings were transferred to 50 mL tubes containing distilled water for hydroponic growth with 16:8 h light: dark cycle and at 25°C for eight days after germination. After complete development of the first true leaf (of growth), treatments were applied 18–21 days after germination and included: (1) iron deficient condition (control with distilled water), (2) excess iron condition (addition of 500 μM of Fe-EDTA, 150 mM of sodium citrate, and 75 μM FeSO4) (Lobréaux et al., 1995). Treatments were applied for 24 h and samples were collected 2, 8, and 24 h after treatment. Three biological replications were included for each treatment.

Development of Markers

Full length coding sequences (CDS) for three ferritin genes (ferritin-1, ferritin-2, ferritin-3) for Medicago truncatula were acquired from the NCBI (National Center for Biological Information) nucleotide database on 15 April 2015. The complete coding sequence of Ferritin-2 mRNA (NCBI reference sequence: XM_003616637.1) of M. truncatula was downloaded in FASTA format and used to perform a nucleotide BLAST search against CDC Redberry 454 contig sequences in the Knowpulse database1. The contig sequence with the highest bit score and lowest e-value and, therefore, having the highest similarity with the query sequence (M. truncatula Ferritin-2) was identified. The contig sequence was downloaded from the Knowpulse database and Primer-BLAST2 was used to design primer pairs using default parameters (Table 1). One primer pair (FerrClo5) used for the development of qPCR compatible primers for the Ferritin gene in lentil. In addition, one primer pair specific to a lentil BHLH (Basic Helix Loop Helix) transcription factor or FER-like transcription factor gene sequence (Sen Gupta et al., 2016) was synthesized. Primers were also designed for the iron-related transporter gene based on the IRT1 mRNA coding sequence (CDS) (LegumeIP database reference no. IMGA[Medtr8g105030.1] of M. truncatula for the amplification of lentil IRT-1 in the qPCR experiment. The amplicon of the ferritin gene as well as the BHLH transcription factor gene were beyond the range of optimum product size (>250 bp) for qPCR experiments and thus were gel purified using a gel purification kit (IBI, MIDSCI, St. Louis, MO, USA) (Vogelstein and Gillespie, 1979) following manufacturer’s instructions and sequenced using the Sanger sequencing method (Etonbiosciences Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The gene sequences were aligned with the respective M. truncatula mRNA sequences (Ferritin-2 and BHLH transcription factor gene, respectively) and primers were designed for qPCR experiments based on the putative exonic sequences, their sequence identity, gap, and the desired product size using Primer3 software2. Based on these sequences one primer pair for Ferritin-1 and another primer pair for the BHLH-1 transcription factor were designed for qPCR. Primers for IRT-1 were directly used in qPCR and were within the qPCR compatible product size range (<100 bp amplicon size).

Table 1.

Nucleotide BLAST results of Medicago truncatula ferritin-2 gene sequence (NCBI reference no. XM_003616637.1) with CDC Redberry 454 contig sequences in Knowpulse database showing bit score, percent identity, and e-value (http://knowpulse.usask.ca).

Hit Bit score Identity% E-value
LcRBContig00605 700 91 0.00e+0
LcRBContig02360 530 90 1.53e-103
LcRBContig20139 142 93 4.44e-5
LcRBContig24460 167 94 1.39e-40
LcRBContig24460 167 94 1.39e-40
LcRBContig13391 167 94 1.39e-40
LcRBContig07868 167 94 1.39e-40
LcRBContig07177 167 94 1.39e-40
LcRBContig01318 167 94 1.39e-40
LcRBContig24151 111 91 7.13e-24

First 10 relevant hits are shown here.

Isolation of RNA and Synthesis of Complementary DNA

Total RNA was extracted from 100 mg of fresh leaves of individual treatments using the QIAGEN® RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA) according to manufacturer instructions. The quality of the RNA extracts were determined by the spectrophotometer Nano-Drop (ND-1000) (NanoDrop Technologies, Welmington, DE, USA). To check the integrity of the RNA, the samples were stained, separated and visualized by electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel. Details about the quality of the RNA samples can be found in Supplementary Table S1. The first strand of cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of total RNA in a 20 μL reaction using SuperScript III First Strand Synthesis Supermix RT-PCR Kit (Invitrogen, USA). The cDNAs were diluted to 2 ng μL-1.

Quantitative PCR

Three primer pairs were used for gene expression analysis, Ferritin1 (developed using PCR based cloning and sequencing), BHLH1 (developed using PCR based cloning and sequencing) and IRT1 (primer designed based on M. truncatula IRT1 gene sequence). Expression levels of mRNA were evaluated in a SYBR Green dye using an Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, USA). PCR amplifications were carried out in triplicate in 20 μL reactions containing Maxima SYBR Green mixer (Fermentas, USA), 250 nM of each primer and 4 ng of cDNA. On each plate, the reference genes (GADPH and Actin) and negative controls were included. Amplification conditions were 50°C for 2 min, 95°C for 10 min, 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 s, 60°C for 1 min. The calibration curves for each primer pair were plotted using five serial dilutions of the cDNA in water. To verify the specificity of amplification a dissociation curve analysis step was added to the qPCR amplification protocol. Amplification efficiency, slope and R2 value were determined for each primer pair. Amplification efficiencies were calculated as E = (10-1/slope–1) × 100.

Statistical Analysis of Gene Expression Analysis

Cycle threshold (CT) values were determined using SDS software (Applied Biosystems, USA). Gene expression data were analyzed using the CT values and amplification efficiency values using method 2-ΔΔCT (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001). Geometric means of reference genes were used to normalize the CT values of the individual samples. The program REST 2009—Relative Expression Software Tool (Pfaffl, 2001) was used to determine if the differences between the treatments were statistically significant (P < 0.05).

Results

Development of Markers for Ferritin-1, BHLH-1, and IRT-1 Genes

After performing BLASTn analysis using ferritin-2 mRNA sequence of Medicago truncatula in the KnowPulse database (University of Saskatchewan, Canada) one contig sequence was identified, LcRBContig00605, based on BIT score (700), sequence identity (91%), and e-value (0) (Table 1). BLASTn results using other plant species resulted in identification of this contig sequence (LcRBContig00605) (data not shown). Optimum PCR conditions for the designed primers (FerrClo5) in an ABI 7500 thermocylcer were established: 94°C for 5 minutes, followed by 30 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 60°C for 1 m, 72°C for 1 min followed by a final elongation step of 72°C for 5 min. The amplified DNA fragment was gel purified and sequenced using Sanger’s method to obtain a 390 bp sequence. Alignment of the partial genomic DNA sequence with the M. truncatula ferritin-2 mRNA sequence (NCBI reference sequence: XM_003616637.1) showed a 92 bp sequence overlap with no gap (Figure 1). This potential exonic sequence was used to design primers (Ferritin-1) using Primer-BLAST (Table 2).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Sequence alignment between Medicago truncatula ferritin-2 full length CDS (NCBI reference no. XM_003616637.1) and lentil Ferritin-1 partial genomic sequence using the MultAlin tool (Corpet, 1988) with default parameter values. The overlapping potential exonic region (95 bp) is marked in blue and red color.

Table 2.

Sequence and Tm (melting temperature) for primers designed based on the CDC Redberry contig (LcRBContig00605) for the Ferritin-1 gene in lentil.

Primer name Forward sequence (5′–3′) Reverse sequence (5′–3′) Tm (°C)
FerrClo1 TGCTGATAAGGGTGATGCGCT GGCTTCCACCTGTTCACCCA 64
FerrClo2 AACCTGCACAGTGTTGCCTC AGTGCCAGACACCATGTCCT 62
FerrClo3 GTTGCGCTGAAAGGTCTTGCT GCCAAGTGCACATCACCAGT 62
FerrClo4 ACGTTGCGCTGAAAGGTCTTG TGCCAAGTGCACATCACCAG 62
FerrClo5 CTGGTGATGTGCACTTGGCA GCTGCAGCTGCTTCCTCACT 62

Primer pairs developed in a previous study (Sen Gupta et al., 2016) were used to amplify the BHLH-1 gene in CDC Redberry genomic DNA. Optimum PCR conditions for BHLH-1 primer pairs in an ABI 7500 thermocylcer were established: 94°C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 60°C for 1 min, 72°C for 1 min followed by a final elongation step of 72°C for 5 min. The amplified fragment sequenced by Sanger’s sequencing method and A 490 bp sequence was obtained. This sequence was aligned with M. truncatula BHLH mRNA sequence (NCBI reference number XM_003606283.1) and based on the alignment (Figure 2) a 75 bp sequence with no gap (potential exonic sequence) was used to design qPCR compatible primers for BHLH-1 in lentil using Primer-BLAST.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Sequence alignment between M. truncatula BHLH full length CDS (NCBI reference number XM_003606283.1) and lentil BHLH-1 partial genomic sequence using the MultAlin (Corpet, 1988) with default parameter values. The overlapping potential exonic region (72 bp) is marked in blue and red color.

Using a M. truncatula iron regulated transporter gene mRNA sequence [LegumeIP database reference no. IMGA(Medtr8g105030.1)] primer pairs (IRT1) were designed for the qPCR study.

Dissociation curve analysis of the three pairs of primers (Ferritin-1, BHLH-1, IRT-1) showed specific amplification (Figure 3). Amplification efficiency of the designed primer pairs and reference genes (GADPH, Actin) were found to be >90% with the exception of BHLH-1 primer pairs (Table 3). Slope values ranged from –0.02 to –3.55 and R2 values ranged between 0.0034 and 0.9972.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

(A) Dissociation curve for Ferritin-1 primer pairs. Derivative plotted in Y-axis is the negative of the rate of change in fluorescence as a fraction of temperature and temperature is plotted on the X-axis. (B) Dissociation curve for BHLH-1 primer pairs. Derivative plotted in Y-axis is the negative of the rate of change in fluorescence as a fraction of temperature and temperature is plotted on the X-axis. (C). Dissociation curve for IRT-1 primer pairs. Derivative plotted in Y-axis is the negative of the rate of change in fluorescence as a fraction of temperature and temperature is plotted on the X-axis.

Table 3.

Amplification statistics for one Ferritin-1, one BHLH-1, one IRT-1 gene specific primer pairs, and one primer pair for each reference gene (GADPH, Actin).

Gene Forward sequence Reverse sequence Tm (°C) Size (bp) Slope R2 E Reference
Ferritin-1 AGATATCCGAGTATGTTGCTCAG AAGATGCACGAATGAAGCAGAAA 61 84 –3.32 0.9968 100.07 Current work
IRT-1 GTCGCTGTTTTGCTAGGTGC GTGAGCTTCTCCTCTTCCCT 61 159 –3.12 0.9954 109.18 Current work
BHLH-1 TTATTAGGGTTAGACTCAACGCA TTGCGATCTTTGGTTCCCA 59 74 –0.02 0.0034 6.55e+42 Sen Gupta et al., 2016
GADPH TGGGCGAAAACTCCACTTTG GAATTGCTGCAGCCTTGTGA 60 57 –3.15 0.9954 107.71 Saha and Vandemark, 2012
Actin CCAAATCATGTTTGAGGCTTTTAA GTGAAAGAACGGCCTGAATAGC 60 64 –3.55 0.9972 91.25 Saha and Vandemark, 2012

Here, Tm = melting temperature, Size = amplicon length, Slope = slope of the trend line in amplification efficiency graph, R2= regression coefficient, E = amplification efficiency.

Expression Analysis of Ferritin-1 and IRT-1 Genes

Using the 2-ΔΔCT method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001), changes in gene transcripts were calculated for the treated samples (under excess iron condition) compared to the control treatments (iron-deficient condition) (Table 4). The changes in gene transcript levels for Ferritin-1 and IRT-1 genes were not significantly different for the shoot tissue (Table 5). A 2.72-fold increase in Ferritin-1 gene transcripts was observed in root tissue after 2 h of iron treatment (P < 0.05) (Table 5). Similarly, a 3.6-fold increase in IRT-1 gene transcripts was observed (P < 0.05) (Table 5).

Table 4.

Differentially expressed Ferritin-1 and IRT-1 genes in CDC Redberry shoot and root tissues over time (2, 8 and 24 h) in three replicates under excess iron.

Gene Plant tissue Time course
2 h 2 h 2 h 8 h 8 h 8 h 24 h 24 h 24 h
Shoot tissue
Ferritin-1 0.29 1.0 3.03 0.47 0.79 1.45 2.7 1.41 0.83
IRT-1 0.37 1.47 0.38 0.15 0.44 1.79 1.38 1.0 0.20
Root tissue
Ferritin-1 1.81 3.29 3.05 0.22 0.52 1.45 0.64 0.32 0.82
IRT-1 1.70 5.03 4.59 0.30 0.55 1.73 0.73 0.44 1.14

Table 5.

Significance of differential expression of samples over time (TC) in excess iron in relation to control samples in shoot and root tissue of CDC Redberry genotype.

TC (h) Gene Tissue N E SE 95% CI P(H1) Remark
2 h Ferritin-1 Shoot 3 0.474 0.241–0.938 0.159–1.264 0.199 NS
8 h Ferritin-1 Shoot 3 1.056 0.763–1.411 0.711–1.843 0.724 NS
24 h Ferritin-1 Shoot 3 1.049 0.589–2.150 0.377–2.792 0.832 NS
2 h Ferritin-1 Root 3 2.724 1.866–4.644 1.342–5.267 0 Up regulated, significant
8 h Ferritin-1 Root 3 0.554 0.310–1.018 0.228–1.395 0.28 NS
24 h Ferritin-1 Root 3 0.558 0.383–0.796 0.096 NS
2 h IRT-1 Shoot 3 0.591 0.223–1.443 0.116–2.883 0.539 NS
8 h IRT-1 Shoot 3 0.487 0.218–1.634 0.162–1.835 0.298 NS
24 h IRT-1 Shoot 3 0.65 0.283–1.280 0.211–2.734 0.517 NS
2 h IRT-1 Root 3 3.563 2.186–5.066 1.874–5.405 0 Up regulated, significant
8 h IRT-1 Root 3 0.672 0.386–1.101 0.313–1.640 0.245 NS

Here, N = number of biological replications, E = Differentiial expression, SE = standard error, P(H1) = Probability of alternative hypothesis.

Discussion

Iron uptake from the soil and translocation within the plant is a complex physiological process. It involves multiple genes and transcription factors. The magnitude of mRNA transcript synthesis under excess iron conditions for iron metabolism related genes (Ferritin-1, BHLH-1, IRT-1) in lentil was evaluated in this study. Two genes, Ferritin-1 and IRT-1, were quantitatively assayed for differential gene expression as they exhibited amplification efficiency of >90 percent (Udvardi et al., 2008).

Dissociation curve analysis (Figure 3) which is the dsDNA melting curve analysis (Udvardi et al., 2008) added at the end of PCR run showed the specificity for single amplicon amplification and expected melting temperature for the individual primer pairs. All of the three primer pairs exhibited a typical single peak with expected melting temperatures (Figure 3). Gene expression quantification values (CT values) were normalized using geometric means of CT values of the two reference genes (GADPH, Actin) (Vandesompele et al., 2002). Actin and GADPH were used in studies in lentil, pea and common bean exhibiting stability of expression across tissues and plant parts (Saha and Vandemark, 2012, 2013, DeLaat et al., 2014). The objective behind the normalization of qPCR data was to remove the sampling error, which may arise due to RNA quantity and quality differences across samples.

In this study, we developed gene-specific molecular markers for three genes (Ferritin-1, BHLH-1, IRT-1) in lentil. Primers for Ferritin-1and IRT-1 were used in differential gene expression analysis. Partial genomic DNA sequences of Ferritin-1 and BHLH-1 were submitted to the NCBI database. These sequences are available to clone full length genomic sequences of each gene in lentil. The partial genomic DNA sequence BHLH-1 gene can be further analyzed and used to develop qPCR compatible primers for this gene. It can be hypothesized from the comparative genomic synteny of lentil with M. truncatula (Phan et al., 2007) that a ferritin gene family does exist in lentil and other ferritin genes in M. truncatula (ferritin-1 and ferritin-3) could be used to develop molecular markers for the respective ferritin genes in lentil. In addition, once the lentil whole genome sequence is released cloning and characterization of ferritin and other iron metabolism related genes will be easier.

In gene expression analysis under excess iron it was observed that only samples with 2 h excess iron treatments exhibited significant differential gene expression (Table 5) for both genes (Ferritin-1 and IRT-1) in root tissues. The absence of such kinetics in gene expression change for samples that were given 8 or 24 h excess iron treatments across the tissues was observed. The possible reason could be the different iron homeostasis mechanisms in lentil compared to other plant species studied under similar conditions. Development of an assay to find out the reason behind such variation could first start with the standardization of external iron treatments in lentil. In common bean by applying identical excess iron concentration (Lobréaux et al., 1995) in leaf tissue similar kinetics of differential gene expression of ferritin genes (PvFer1, PvFer2, and PvFer1) were observed (DeLaat et al., 2014). Out of the three genotypes (IAC-Diplomata, Carioca, and BAT 477) used there had been significant genotypic differences of ferritin gene expression for two ferritin genes (PvFer1, PvFer2) (DeLaat et al., 2014). There were no significant differences among the treatments (control with distilled water, osmotic shock causing polyethylene glycol (PEG) treated, excess iron treated, PEG + excess iron treated) for any of the ferritin genes (DeLaat et al., 2014). The interaction between time and treatment was only significant for the PvFer2 and interaction between time and cultivar was significant for the PvFer3 ferritin gene (DeLaat et al., 2014). In most of the treatments ferritin genes were up regulated, however, there were treatments where PvFer1 and PvFer3 were down regulated (DeLaat et al., 2014) over time. The above-mentioned facts for common bean ferritin genes support the results we obtained in the case of Ferritin-1 and IRT-1 genes under identical conditions. Further, the gene expression levels for iron metabolism related genes were low in lentil as evident by the high CT values. Number of biological replications may be increased to improve power of the test. The difference between seedling and adult plant physiology should be taken into consideration in future experiments. In summary, gene specific markers were developed for three iron metabolism related genes (Ferritin-1, BHLH-1, IRT-1) in lentil using PCR based cloning and significant differential expression was observed for Ferritin-1 and IRT-1 genes at the transcriptional level.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: KM, DSG, SK. Performed the experiments: DSG. Analyzed the data: DSG. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: KM. Wrote the paper: DSG, KM, SK. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

DSG thanks Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi for awarding Netaji Subhas ICAR International Fellowship for Doctoral study.

Funding. This work was supported by the North Dakota State University and a doctoral fellowship was awarded to DSG from Indian Council of Agricultural Research.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2017.00579/full#supplementary-material

References

  1. Briat J. F., Céline D., Karl R., Frédéric G. (2009). Ferritins and iron storage in plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1800 806–814. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2009.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Colangelo E. P., Guerinot M. L. (2004). Put the metal to the petal: metal uptake and transport throughout plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 9 322–330. 10.1016/j.pbi.2006.03.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Corpet F. (1988). Multiple sequence alignment with hierarchical clustering. Nucl. Acids Res. 16 10881–10890. 10.1093/nar/16.22.10881 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Crichton R. R., Ponce-Ortiz Y., Koch M. H., Parfait R., Stuhrmann H. B. (1978). Isolation and characterization of phytoferritin from pea (Pisum sativum) and lentil (Lens esculenta). Biochem. J. 171 349–356. 10.1042/bj1710349 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DeLaat D. M., Colombo C. A., Chiorato A. F., Carbonell S. A. M. (2014). Induction of ferritin synthesis by water deficit and iron excess in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Mol. Biol. Rep. 41 1427–1435. 10.1007/s11033-013-2987-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Eide D., Broderius M., Fett J., Guerinot M. L. (1996). A novel iron-regulated metal transporter from plants identified by functional expression in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93 5624–5628. 10.1073/pnas.93.11.5624 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Harrison P. M., Hempstead P. D., Artymiuk P. J., Andrews S. C. (1998). Structure–function relationships in the ferritins. Met. Ions Biol. Syst. 35 435–477. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Heim M. A., Jakoby M., Werber M., Martin C., Weisshaar B., Bailey P. C. (2003). The basic helix–loop–helix transcription factor family in plants: a genome-wide study of protein structure and functional diversity. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20 735–747. 10.1093/molbev/msg088 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jakoby M., Wang H. Y., Reidt W., Weisshaar B., Bauer P. (2004). FRU (BHLH029) is required for induction of iron mobilization genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. FEBS Lett. 577 528–534. 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.10.062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kalgaonkar S., Lonnerdal B. (2008). Effects of dietary factors on iron uptake from ferritin by Caco-2 cells. J. Nutr. Biochem. 19 33–39. 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2007.02.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Livak K. J., Schmittgen T. D. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods 4 402–408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lobréaux S., Thoiron S., Briat J. F. (1995). Induction of ferritin synthesis in maize leaves by an iron-mediated oxidative stress. Plant J. 8 443–449. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1995.08030443.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pfaffl M. W. (2001). A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT–PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:e45 10.1093/nar/29.9.e45 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Phan H. T., Ellwood S. R., Hane J. K., Ford R., Materne M., Oliver R. P. (2007). Extensive macrosynteny between Medicago truncatula and ssp. culinaris. Theor. Appl. Genet. 114 549–558. 10.1007/s00122-006-0455-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ragland M., Briat J. F., Gagnon J., Laulhere J. P., Massenet O., Theil E. C. (1990). Evidence for conservation of ferritin sequences among plants and animals and for a transit peptide in soybean. J. Biol. Chem. 265 18339–18344. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Robinson N. J., Procter C. M., Connolly E. L., Guerinot M. L. (1999). A ferric-chelate reductase for iron uptake from soils. Nature 397 694–697. 10.1038/17800 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Römheld V., Schaaf G. (2004). Iron transport in plants: future research in view of a plant nutritionist and a molecular biologist. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 50 1003–1012. 10.1080/00380768.2004.10408567 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Saha G. C., Vandemark G. J. (2012). Evaluation of expression stability of candidate references genes among green and yellow pea cultivars (Pisum sativum L.) subjected to abiotic and biotic stress. Am. J. Plant Sci. 3 235–242. 10.4236/ajps.2012.32028 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Saha G. C., Vandemark G. J. (2013). Stability of expression of reference genes among different lentil (Lens culinaris) genotypes subjected to cold stress, white mold disease, and Aphanomyces root rot. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 31 1109–1115. 10.1007/s11105-013-0579-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sen Gupta D., Cheng P., Sablok G., Thavarajah P., Coyne C. J., Kumar S., et al. (2016). Development of a panel of unigene-derived polymorphic EST-SSR markers in lentil using public database information. Crop J. 4 425–433. 10.1016/j.cj.2016.06.012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Udvardi M. K., Czechowski T., Scheible W. R. (2008). Eleven golden rules of quantitative RT-PCR. Plant Cell 20 1736–1737. 10.1105/tpc.108.061143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Vandenberg A., Banniza S., Warkentin T. D., Ife S., Barlow B., McHale S., et al. (2006). CDC Redberry lentil. Can J. Plant Sci. 86 497–498. 10.4141/P05-071 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Vandesompele J., De Preter K., Pattyn F., Poppe B., Van R. N., De Paepe A., et al. (2002). Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 3 RESEARCH0034 10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research0034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Vert G., Grotz N., Dédaldéchamp F., Gaymard F., Guerinot M. L., Briat J. F., et al. (2002). IRT1, an Arabidopsis transporter essential for iron uptake from the soil and for plant growth. Plant Cell 14 1223–1233. 10.1105/tpc.001388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Vogelstein B., Gillespie D. (1979). Preparative and analytical purification of DNA from agarose. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76 615–619. 10.1073/pnas.76.2.615 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wade V. J., Treffry A., Laulhère J. P., Bauminger E. R., Cleton M. I., Mann S., et al. (1993). Structure and composition of ferritin cores from pea seed (Pisum sativum). Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1161 91–96. 10.1016/0167-4838(93)90201-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Welch R. M., Graham R. D. (2004). Breeding for micronutrients in staple food crops from a human nutrition perspective. J. Exp. Bot. 55 353–364. 10.1093/jxb/erh064 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Yuan Y. X., Zhang J., Wang D. W., Ling H. Q. (2005). AtbHLH29 of Arabidopsis thaliana is a functional ortholog of tomato FER involved in controlling iron acquisition in strategy I plants. Cell Res 15 613–621. 10.1038/sj.cr.7290331 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Frontiers in Plant Science are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES