Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Microbiol. 2017 Mar 8;104(2):212–233. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13622

c-di-AMP modulates Listeria monocytogenes central metabolism to regulate growth, antibiotic resistance, and osmoregulation

Aaron T Whiteley 1,, Nicholas E Garelis 2, Bret N Peterson 3, Philip H Choi 4, Liang Tong 4, Joshua J Woodward 5, Daniel A Portnoy 2,6,
PMCID: PMC5391996  NIHMSID: NIHMS858723  PMID: 28097715

Summary

Cyclic di-adenosine monophosphate (c-di-AMP) is a conserved nucleotide second messenger critical for bacterial growth and resistance to cell wall-active antibiotics. In Listeria monocytogenes, the sole diadenylate cyclase, DacA, is essential in rich, but not synthetic media and ΔdacA mutants are highly sensitive to the β-lactam antibiotic cefuroxime. In this study, loss of function mutations in the oligopeptide importer (oppABCDF) and glycine betaine importer (gbuABC) allowed ΔdacA mutants to grow in rich medium. Oligopeptides were sufficient to inhibit growth of the ΔdacA mutant and we hypothesized that oligopeptides act as osmolytes, similar to glycine betaine, to disrupt intracellular osmotic pressure. Supplementation with salt stabilized the ΔdacA mutant in rich medium and restored cefuroxime resistance. Additional suppressor mutations in the acetyl-CoA binding site of pyruvate carboxylase (PycA) rescued cefuroxime resistance and resulted in a 100-fold increase in virulence of the ΔdacA mutant. PycA is inhibited by c-di-AMP and these mutations prompted us to examine the role of TCA cycle enzymes. Inactivation of citrate synthase, but not down-stream enzymes suppressed ΔdacA phenotypes. These data suggested that c-di-AMP modulates central metabolism at the pyruvate node to moderate citrate production and indeed, the ΔdacA mutant accumulated 6-times the concentration of citrate present in wild-type bacteria.

Abbreviated Summary

c-di-AMP is an essential nucleotide second messenger in many bacteria. In this report, Whiteley et al. demonstrate that suppressor mutations in the acetyl-CoA binding site of Listeria monocytogenes pyruvate carboxylase restore growth, resistance to cell-wall antibiotics, and virulence of a mutant unable to produce c-di-AMP. These data suggest that c-di-AMP modulates central metabolism at the pyruvate node, which is necessary for optional growth, osmoregulation, and virulence.

graphic file with name nihms858723u1.jpg

Introduction

Bacterial nucleotide second messengers are signaling molecules that act as allosteric regulators of proteins and riboswitches. The best characterized include: cAMP, which is synthesized during glucose starvation, (p)ppGpp which is synthesized in response to amino acid starvation as part of the stringent response, and cyclic di-GMP, which modulates the transition from sessile to planktonic growth (Kalia et al., 2013). More recently, cyclic diadenosine monophosphate (c-di-AMP) and cyclic AMP-GMP have been added to the growing list of cyclic dinucleotide second messengers (Romling, 2008; Davies et al., 2012). However, unlike cAMP and (p)ppGpp, which are synthesized upon stress, c-di-AMP is required for growth in conventional media and the cues that regulate its synthesis and degradation are less well-defined (Corrigan and Gründling, 2013). Production of c-di-AMP from two ATP molecules is catalyzed by diadenylate cyclases (DAC) that share a common protein domain and are distributed in the genomes of virtually all Gram-positive bacteria, some Gram-negative bacteria, and archaea (Witte et al., 2008).

In Firmicutes (e.g. bacilli, streptococci, staphylococci, and listeria), c-di-AMP is often essential (Commichau et al., 2015; Cheng et al., 2015). Decreased c-di-AMP levels result in growth defects, susceptibility to cell wall-targeting antibiotics, dysregulation of potassium import, and alterations in salt tolerance (Corrigan and Gründling, 2013; Zhu et al., 2015; Moscoso et al., 2015). Mutations in c-di-AMP specific phosphodiesterases increase c-di-AMP levels, suppress growth defects of lipotechoic acid biosynthesis mutants, and increase resistance to β-lactam antibiotics such as the β-lactam cephalosporin cefuroxime (Corrigan et al., 2011; Corrigan and Gründling, 2013). These data support a correlation between c-di-AMP levels and resistance to cell wall-targeting antibiotics that is conserved among Firmicutes. In many of these organisms the diadenylate cyclase DacA (also known as CdaA) is encoded within the same operon and interacts with GlmM (Gundlach et al., 2015b; Zhu et al., 2015; Rismondo et al., 2016), an enzyme responsible for the conversion of glucosamine-6-phosphate to glucosamine-1-phosphate, an early step of peptidoglycan biosynthesis (Barreteau et al., 2008). It is unclear if this interaction is important for c-di-AMP associated cell wall defects.

Listeria monocytogenes is a Gram-positive bacterium that has a biphasic lifestyle as a ubiquitous saprophyte and as a facultative intracellular pathogen of humans and animals (Tilney and Portnoy, 1989; Freitag et al., 2009). L. monocytogenes has a single diadenylate cyclase (DacA) and two c-di-AMP-specific phosphodiesterases (PdeA and PgpH) (Woodward et al., 2010; Witte et al., 2013; Huynh et al., 2015). L. monocytogenes mutants with altered expression of either DacA or the phosphodiesterases revealed that both high or low c-di-AMP levels result in slower growth (Witte et al., 2013; Huynh and Woodward, 2016). To dissect the role(s) played by c-di-AMP in L. monocytogenes, Sureka et. al. identified c-di-AMP binding proteins by affinity chromatography (Sureka et al., 2014). Most strikingly, they identified that c-di-AMP is an inhibitor of pyruvate carboxylase (PycA) and dacA depletion showed corresponding metabolic imbalances that resulted in bacteriolysis. In L. monocytogenes, PycA is the primary anabolic source of oxaloacetate, an intermediate of the TCA cycle and amino acid biosynthesis (Schar et al., 2010). However, it is unclear why increased oxaloacetate was toxic. Sureka et al. also identified a homolog of PstA, a protein identified in a systematic search for c-di-AMP binding proteins in Staphylococcus aureus (Corrigan et al., 2013). PstA is a small (11.8 kDa), widely distributed, PII-like protein (Forchhammer, 2008), that has been identified and structurally characterized in Bacillus subtilis, S. aureus, and L. monocytogenes (Müller et al., 2015; Campeotto et al., 2015; Gundlach et al., 2015a; Choi et al., 2015). Other PII-like proteins modulate nitrogen metabolism via protein-protein interactions and are modulated by a cognate small molecule (Ninfa and Jiang, 2005). PstA protein-protein interactions are likely inhibited by c-di-AMP (Choi et al., 2015), however, these interactions have not been identified and PstA function remains poorly characterized.

c-di-AMP also interacts with the cystathionine-β-synthase (CBS) domain-containing proteins of unknown function CbpA and CbpB, and a carnitine importer (OpuCA)(Sureka et al., 2014; Huynh et al., 2016; Schuster et al., 2016). Carnitine is a “compatible solute” similar to glycine betaine, which act as osmoprotectants and are accumulated by cells during adaptation to osmotic stress (Wood, 2015). Osmotic stressors alter the extracellular concentration of solutes, which affect the hydration of the cytosol and cellular turgor pressure (Wood, 2011). Adaptation to osmotic upshift (extracellular increases in osmotic pressure) starts with import/synthesis of K+ and glutamate followed by the accumulation of compatible solutes (Wood, 1999). c-di-AMP inhibits OpuCA and in related organisms inhibits potassium import (Corrigan et al., 2013; Moscoso et al., 2015; Huynh et al., 2016), indicating a role for c-di-AMP in osmoregulation.

Our lab has taken a genetic approach to dissect the role(s) of c-di-AMP in the physiology of L. monocytogenes. Mutants lacking c-di-AMP (ΔdacA) cannot form colonies on conventional rich medium unless they accrue one or more suppressor mutations (Whiteley et al., 2015). For example, mutants unable to synthesize (p)ppGpp grew in rich medium suggesting that elevated (p)ppGpp levels were partially responsible for the growth defect of ΔdacA and that these organisms were experiencing an unknown stress that leads to increased production of (p)ppGpp. c-di-AMP and (p)ppGpp levels appeared to be inversely correlated. Whereas (p)ppGpp is essential for growth in synthetic but not rich media, c-di-AMP was identified as essential for growth in rich but not synthetic media (Whiteley et al., 2015). ΔdacA mutants can be constructed and maintained without the appearance of suppressor mutations if bacteria are cultivated in a synthetic medium. Although ΔdacA mutants grow on synthetic medium they are highly susceptible to cefuroxime. In this study, we characterized additional suppressor mutations that allowed for growth in rich medium and identified mutations in the oligopeptide transporter (oppA-F), the glycine-betaine transporter (gbuA-C), cbpB, pstA, and pycA. Only null mutations in pstA, point mutations in PycA that blocked acetyl-CoA mediated allosteric activation, or addition of salt to media suppressed sensitivity to cefuroxime. These data suggest that ΔdacA mutants are unable to regulate intracellular osmotic pressure, which becomes growth inhibitory when oligopeptides or cefuroxime are present. Further, c-di-AMP-dependent modulation of the TCA cycle altered osmotic pressure and was important for virulence of L. monocytogenes.

Results

c-di-AMP is essential for growth in rich medium and resistance to cefuroxime

L. monocytogenes encodes one di-adenylate cyclase (DacA), and previous research demonstrated that dacA was conditionally essential for growth in rich, but not defined synthetic media. We have extended these observations by constructing ΔdacA mutants in Listeria synthetic medium (LSM, see Table S1 and Experimental Procedures for details) that promoted enhanced growth of both wild-type and ΔdacA bacteria and was easily adapted to solid-agar and liquid culture. To analyze growth in rich medium, ΔdacA mutants were constructed in LSM, grown in LSM-culture overnight, and 10-fold serial dilutions were plated on LSM-agar and the L. monocytogenes conventional rich medium brain heart infusion (BHI)-agar (Fig. 1A). This assay compared the ability of L. monocytogenes mutants to grow in rich vs. defined solid media. Whereas wild-type bacteria formed an equivalent number of colonies on LSM and rich media, the ΔdacA mutant formed over 10,000-fold fewer colonies on rich medium (Fig. 1A and 1B). Growth in rich medium was restored by expressing the native diadenylate cyclase dacA or the distantly related diadenylate cyclase disA from B. subtilis (Fig. 1A and 1B)(Witte et al., 2008). DacA and DisA share a diadenylate cyclase protein domain, but DisA, unlike DacA, is not membrane-localized.

Figure 1. Growth of c-di-AMP-deficient mutants in rich medium and resistance to cefuroxime.

Figure 1

(A and B) Mutants constructed and grown overnight in LSM were serially diluted 10-fold in a 96-well plate with PBS then 5 μL of each dilution was spotted onto either LSM or BHI agar. Images were taken and CFU were enumerated after 48 hrs of incubation at 37 °C. (C) Immunoblot of DacA and P60 (loading control) proteins for the strains indicated, grown to mid-log in LSM at 37°C. Data are representative of three independent experiments. (D) Antibiotic sensitivity measured by disk diffusion of 125 μg of cefuroxime on LSM-agar for the indicated L. monocytogenes strains measured at 48 hrs. (B and D) Data are mean ± standard error of the mean (s.e.m) of at least three independent experiments.

DacA interacts with the peptidoglycan biosynthesis enzyme GlmM (Gundlach et al., 2015b; Zhu et al., 2015; Rismondo et al., 2016), however, the consequences of this interaction are unclear. When grown in LSM, the ΔdacA mutant was extremely sensitive to the cell wall-targeting β-lactam antibiotic cefuroxime (Fig. 1D) and it is unclear if this phenotype might be due to DacA regulation of GlmM. The impact of this interaction was interrogated by constructing a strain of L. monocytogenes that expressed a catalytically inactive allele of dacA, (D171A). The D171A mutation disrupts the catalytic capability of DacA (Rosenberg et al., 2015), but did not affect DacA synthesis (Fig. 1C). The dacAD171A mutant was equivalent to the ΔdacA mutant for growth in rich medium and resistance to cefuroxime (Fig. 1B and 1D). These data, along with ability of disA to complement ΔdacA, suggest that targets of c-di-AMP, not DacA physical interactions, are responsible for cell wall homeostasis and growth in rich medium.

Suppressor mutations allow ΔdacA to grow in rich medium

All ΔdacA mutants recovered after growth in rich medium harbored suppressor mutations (Whiteley et al., 2015). When overnight cultures were serially diluted onto solid media, 109 cfu mL-1 were recovered on LSM while 105 cfu ml-1 were recovered on rich media, suggesting that suppressor mutations arose at a rate of approximately 10-4 in rich medium (Fig. 1B). Suppressor mutations in relA such as R295S were previously investigated, and are sufficient to ameliorate dacA essentiality, demonstrating that increased (p)ppGpp is growth inhibitory in the absence of c-di-AMP (Whiteley et al., 2015). The remaining loss-of-function suppressor mutations found in multiple strains were identified at 4 loci: the oligo-peptide permease (opp)(Borezee et al., 2000), the glycine betaine importer (gbu)(Ko and Smith, 1999), and the genes of unknown function CbpB and PstA (Fig. 2A-F). These mutations will be investigated here. Loss-of-function mutations in genes encoding the Opp were found in over 94% of ΔdacA suppressor mutants (Whiteley et al., 2015). The Opp is a five-subunit active importer of oligopeptides, consisting of an extracellular solute binding protein (OppA), transmembrane permeases (OppBC), and two ATPases (OppDF)(Fig. 2A and 2B)(Borezee et al., 2000). Mutations in any of the Opp components, with the exception of the ATPases, are sufficient to inactivate Opp import of peptides. The gbuABC operon encodes a glycine betaine importer homologous to opuAABC in B. subtilis, that is important for survival during osmotic shock (Ko and Smith, 1999; Sleator et al., 2003). CbpB and PstA were identified as c-di-AMP-binding proteins and their functions remain poorly characterized (Sureka et al., 2014; Choi et al., 2015).

Figure 2. ΔdacA suppressor mutants.

Figure 2

(A and B) Illustration of oligopeptide permease (Opp) operon and protein subunits. (C and D) Illustration of glycine-betaine importer (Gbu) operon and protein subunits. (E) Operon of c-di-AMP binding protein B (cbpB) which encodes a c-di-AMP binding, CBS domain containing, protein of unknown function. ccpC, catabolite control protein and LysR family transcriptional regulator (Kim et al., 2005); dapH, 2,3,4,5-tetrahydropyridine-2,6-dicarboxylate N-acetyltransferase; dapL, N-acetyl-diaminopimelate deacetylase (similar to dapL in B. subtilis). (F) Operon of PII-like signal transduction protein A (pstA) a c-di-AMP binding, PII-like, protein of unknown function. lmo2694, hypothetical ornithine/lysine/arginine decarboxylase (similar to yaaO in B. subtilis); tmk, thymidylate kinase. (A, C, E, and F) Mutations previously identified (Whiteley et al., 2015) and not drawn to scale. (G) Enumeration of CFU on indicated media for L. monocytogenes strains constructed in LSM. “+” vs “Δ” indicate a mutation in a wild-type or dacA-deficient background. Data are mean ± s.e.m of at least three independent experiments.

ΔdacA suppressor mutants harbored mutations in either a single locus (relA or opp) or multiple loci (gbu, cbpB, and pstA). Deletion mutations for oppB, gbuABC, cbpB, and pstA, along with the previously investigated relAR295S allele, were constructed in wild-type and ΔdacA backgrounds and characterized for growth in rich medium. Strikingly, each of these null mutations independently suppressed dacA essentiality in rich medium (Fig. 2G). These phenotypes could be fully complemented in ΔgbuABC and ΔpstA, and partially complemented in relAR295S due to the dominant nature of the mutation (Fig. S1)(Whiteley et al., 2015). We hypothesize that ΔcpbB was only partially complemented due to low expression of the complementation construct. The ΔoppB mutant could not be complemented due to toxicity to E. coli (see Experimental Procedures for details)(Fig. S1).

ΔdacA mutants are unable to grow in the presence of peptides or resist cefuroxime due to defects in osmoregulation

We hypothesized that substrates of the Opp and Gbu transporters were toxic to ΔdacA mutants and first analyzed the role of imported oligopeptides. In other organisms, Opp-imported oligopeptides have been described as either peptide pheromones, peptide fragments of peptidoglycan, or nutritive oligopeptides (Maqbool et al., 2011). We reasoned that the former two types of peptides are derived from L. monocytogenes and would likely still be synthesized in LSM but that ΔdacA is unable to grow in rich medium due to the presence of nutritive oligopeptides. The impact of nutritive oligopeptides was tested by supplementing LSM with a tryptic digest of casein, which prevented the growth of ΔdacA but not ΔdacAΔoppB or ΔdacA complemented with disA (Fig. 3A). Similarly, the ΔdacA mutant was unable to grow in the presence of the synthetic oligopeptides “KLLLLK”, “KAAAAK”, and “AQ”, but grew well when the molar equivalent of alanine and glutamine were provided as free amino acids (Fig. 3B). The growth-restrictive phenotype of synthetic peptides was not observed for wild-type or ΔdacAΔoppB bacteria (Fig. 3B). These data suggested that dipeptides were efficiently imported by the Opp and that increased transporter activity or synthesis may underlie phenotypes of the ΔdacA mutant. The activity of the Opp transporter was measured by disk diffusion of the toxic peptide antibiotic bialaphos (Perego et al., 1991). In this assay, no zone of clearance was observed for the ΔoppB mutant and the ΔdacA mutant was modestly more sensitive (Fig. S2A), revealing that Opp activity may be slightly increased in the ΔdacA mutant, but that the growth-inhibitory effect of peptides in the absence of c-di-AMP is also the product of changes in bacterial physiology. In line with this hypothesis, all identified suppressor mutations enabled ΔdacA mutants to grow in LSM supplemented with oligopeptides (Fig. S2B), but did not considerably alter sensitivity to bialaphos (data not shown).

Figure 3. Growth of ΔdacA in media containing oligopeptides and salt.

Figure 3

(A-D) Enumeration of CFU on indicated media for L. monocytogenes strains constructed in LSM. Dashed line indicates limit of detection (Lod). (B) “KLLLLK”, “KAAAAK”, and “AQ” are sequences of synthetic oligopeptides added, and “A&Q” is the molar equivalent of free amino acids (E) Cefuroxime disk diffusion on LSM-agar supplemented with the indicated concentration of NaCl. All data are mean ± s.e.m of at least three independent experiments.

The predicted substrate of the Gbu transporter is glycine betaine, a compatible osmolyte that allows bacteria to cope with osmotic stress and modulate the water content/turgor pressure of the cell. Mutations in gbuABC are predicted to decrease the internal osmotic pressure of ΔdacA mutants; thus, we hypothesized that dacA is conditionally essential due to large differences in internal and external osmotic pressure that are exacerbated by import of glycine betaine. In support of this hypothesis, addition of NaCl and KCl to rich medium, which increases extracellular osmotic pressure, restored growth of ΔdacA mutants in rich medium (Fig. 3C and 3D). From these data we speculated that a general role for c-di-AMP in coping with osmotic pressure might underlie other ΔdacA phenotypes, such as sensitivity to cefuroxime. This hypothesis is supported by literature demonstrating that peptides and amino acids act as osmoprotectants (Maria-Rosario et al., 1995), and that c-di-AMP directly inhibits carnitine import via OpuCA (Huynh et al., 2016), Intriguingly, supplementation of LSM with NaCl rescued the sensitivity of the ΔdacA mutant to cefuroxime but had no effect on wild-type L. monocytogenes (Fig. 3E). These data suggest that c-di-AMP modulates bacterial physiology to decrease internal osmotic pressure, which is important for growth on peptides and resistance to cell wall-acting antibiotics.

PstA mutations suppress ΔdacA sensitivity to cefuroxime

c-di-AMP appeared to alter internal osmotic pressure through a yet unidentified mechanism. Our analysis next aimed to identify mutations that suppressed ΔdacA cefuroxime sensitivity. Mutations in relA, oppB, gbuABC, cbpB, and pstA suppressed growth of ΔdacA in rich medium (Fig. 2G) but only the ΔpstA mutation suppressed the sensitivity of the ΔdacA mutant to cefuroxime (Fig. 4). This phenotype was complemented by over-expressing pstA containing a C-terminal strep(II)-tag (SII) from a neutral locus, confirming the affinity-tagged fusion protein was biologically active (Fig. 4). PstA appeared to have a central role in ΔdacA phenotypes; however, despite an abundance of structural information for PstA and its homologs, its function is poorly understood (Müller et al., 2015; Campeotto et al., 2015; Gundlach et al., 2015a; Choi et al., 2015). We hypothesized that in the absence of c-di-AMP, PstA-protein interactions were stabilized, which led to an inability of ΔdacA to grow in rich medium and to resist cefuroxime. Accordingly, we performed SPINE affinity purification of PstA from L. monocytogenes and a yeast 2-hybrid to identify PstA-interacting proteins (Herzberg et al., 2007). Unfortunately, we were unable to confirm any protein-protein interactions with high confidence.

Figure 4. ΔdacA suppressor mutant resistance to cefuroxime.

Figure 4

Cefuroxime disk diffusion on LSM-agar of L. monocytogenes strains. Data are mean ± s.e.m of at least three independent experiments.

Additional suppressor mutations that confer resistance to cefuroxime map to the acetyl-CoA binding site of pyruvate carboxylase

To gain further insight into the function of c-di-AMP, we screened for suppressor mutations that phenocopied ΔpstA and suppressed toxicity of rich medium and β-lactam antibiotics. We constructed a ΔdacA mutant merodiploid for pstAdacA p-pstA, to avoid isolating further pstA mutations), selected cefuroxime-resistant colonies, and screened for growth in rich medium (Fig. 5A). Genome sequencing of suppressor mutants revealed that 15 of 16 strains harbored mutations in pyruvate carboxylase (pycA)(Table 1). PycA converts pyruvate and bicarbonate to oxaloacetate using a biotin cofactor with hydrolysis of ATP. In L. monocytogenes PycA is the primary source of oxaloacetate due to an incomplete TCA cycle and other metabolic insufficiencies (Fig. 5B) (Eylert et al., 2008; Schar et al., 2010).

Figure 5. Suppressor mutations of ΔdacA cefuroxime sensitivity.

Figure 5

(A) Illustration of suppressor analysis. (B) Schematic of central metabolism in L. monocytogenes. Grey arrows with red X indicate enzymes not encoded in the L. monocytogenes genome, bold labels indicate enzyme names, and non-bold labels indicate metabolites. Underlined labels indicate metabolic pathways providing or using precursors/products of the enzymes shown. OAA, oxaloacetate; CIT, citrate; ICI, isocitrate; αKG, 2-oxoketoglutarate; SUC, succinate; CoA, coenzyme A; FUM, fumarate; MAL, malate. (C) PycA suppressor mutations from Table 1 on color-coded protein domains showing the biotin carboxylase (BC), pyruvate carboxylase tetramerization (PT), carboxyltransferase (CT), and biotin carboxyl carrier protein (BCCP) domains. Figure not drawn to scale. (D) Crystal structure of PycA (PDB: 4QSH, (Sureka et al., 2014)) from L. monocytogenes with modeled suppressor mutations on all four monomers. Monomer 1 is colored as in (C) and only mutations on this monomer are labeled. The resolved c-di-AMP (cdA) molecules are shown in red. (E) Crystal structure of PycA homolog from S. aureus (PDB: 3HO8, (Yu et al., 2009)) with modeled suppressor mutations at homologous residues on all four monomers. Monomer 1 is colored as in (C) and only mutations near the acetyl-CoA binding site are labeled on this monomer. The resolved coenzyme A ligands are also shown. (F) Detailed view of (E) modeling interactions between the S. aureus arginine residues homologous to R367 and R1051 with coenzyme A. Dashed red lines hydrogen bonds. (D, E, and F) Visualizations made with PyMol software. (G) Enzymatic activity of recombinant PycA in the absence or presence of the allosteric activator acetyl-CoA. Data are the mean ± s.e.m. of three independent experiments and p values were calculated using a heteroscedastic Student's t-test; ** p < 0.001, ns p > 0.05.

Table 1. Suppressor mutations identified in ΔdacA p-pstA mutants capable of growth on rich media and resistance to cefuroxime.

Strain Genome Coordinates Reference Allelea Gene Name 10403S Locus EGD-e locus Protein name Uniprot Entry Locus amino acid change
DP-L6544 1081790 T A pycA LMRG_00534 lmo1072 pyruvate carboxylase A0A0H3GJD4_LISM4 Val241Glu

DP-L6545 1082155 G T pycA LMRG_00534 lmo1072 pyruvate carboxylase A0A0H3GJD4_LISM4 Val363Leu

DP-L6546 1082155 G T pycA LMRG_00534 lmo1072 pyruvate carboxylase A0A0H3GJD4_LISM4 Val363Leu

DP-L6547 1082168 G T pycA LMRG_00534 lmo1072 pyruvate carboxylase A0A0H3GJD4_LISM4 Arg367Leu

DP-L6548 1082168 G T pycA LMRG_00534 lmo1072 pyruvate carboxylase A0A0H3GJD4_LISM4 Arg367Leu

DP-L6548 1272594 C T

DP-L6549 1082408 C A pycA LMRG_00534 lmo1072 pyruvate carboxylase A0A0H3GJD4_LISM4 Thr447Lys

DP-L6550 1082408 C A pycA LMRG_00534 lmo1072 pyruvate carboxylase A0A0H3GJD4_LISM4 Thr447Lys

DP-L6551 1082939 C T pycA LMRG_00534 lmo1072 pyruvate carboxylase A0A0H3GJD4_LISM4 Pro624Leu

DP-L6552 1082939 C T pycA LMRG_00534 lmo1072 pyruvate carboxylase A0A0H3GJD4_LISM4 Pro624Leu

DP-L6553 1082939 C T pycA LMRG_00534 lmo1072 pyruvate carboxylase A0A0H3GJD4_LISM4 Pro624Leu

DP-L6554 1083536 C T pycA LMRG_00534 lmo1072 pyruvate carboxylase A0A0H3GJD4_LISM4 Pro823Leu

DP-L6555 910001 G A rsbU LMRG_02316 lmo0892 Sigma-B regulation protein, phosphatase A0A0H3GEW1_LISM4 Gly79Ser
DP-L6555 1083536 C T pycA LMRG_00534 lmo1072 pyruvate carboxylase A0A0H3GJD4_LISM4 Pro823Leu

DP-L6556 1083536 C T pycA LMRG_00534 lmo1072 pyruvate carboxylase A0A0H3GJD4_LISM4 Pro823Leu

DP-L6557 1084219 C T pycA LMRG_00534 lmo1072 pyruvate carboxylase A0A0H3GJD4_LISM4 Arg1051Cys

DP-L6558 1852607 G T stp LMRG_00968 lmo1821 serine/threonine phosphatase A0A0H3GDQ3_LISM4 His41Asn

Genome sequencing results of suppressor mutants. Some strains harbored identical mutations and it is unclear if these strains were derived from the same parent suppressor mutant or arose independently of one another.

a

Nucleotide variations as compared to the parent strain

PycA is allosterically regulated by a diverse set of metabolites, including inhibition by c-di-AMP (Sureka et al., 2014) and activation by acetyl-CoA. All of the identified PycA suppressor mutations encoded point mutations, which were modeled onto the crystal structure of tetrameric PycA from L. monocytogenes (Fig. 5C and D) (Sureka et al., 2014). None of the mutations were located near the c-di-AMP-binding site or on the biotin carboxyl carrier protein (BCCP) to which the biotin cofactor is attached (Fig. 5D). Suppressor mutations in PycA were next modeled onto the homologous residues in the structure of S. aureus pyruvate carboxylase (Fig. 5E) (Xiang and Tong, 2008). Many of the mutations clustered near the acetyl-CoA binding site, which was previously revealed in this structure (Fig. 5E) (Yu et al., 2009) and in the structure of Rhizobium etli pyruvate carboxylase (Maurice et al., 2007), but such a structure for L. monocytogenes PycA is currently not available. Acetyl-CoA allosterically activates pyruvate carboxylase by interacting with four conserved arginine residues to induce a conformational change proposed to increase catalytic activity (Yu et al., 2009). Two suppressor mutations, R1051C and R367L, alter those arginine residues and are predicted to disrupt interactions with the phosphates of acetyl-CoA (Fig. 5F, modeling the homologous residues of S. aureus pyruvate carboxylase). In a previous report, mutating another arginine residue in the binding pocket greatly reduced the sensitivity of pyruvate carboxylase to acetyl-CoA (Xiang and Tong, 2008). Enzyme activity of recombinant L. monocytogenes PycA was measured in an in vitro assay and more than doubled in the presence of 100 μM acetyl-CoA (Fig. 5G). The R1051C and R367L mutations abrogated acetyl-CoA-mediated activation (Fig. 5G). The R1051C mutation decreased enzyme activity relative to wild-type enzyme without ligand. Interestingly, the R367L mutation resulted in increased activity compared to the wild-type enzyme without ligand but remained less than wild-type enzyme with acetyl-CoA (Fig. 5G).

The R1051C and R367L mutations were selected from the screen and reconstructed in L. monocytogenes by complementing a ΔpycA strain. PycA protein levels were unaffected by these mutations (Fig. 6A) and when dacA was deleted, the PycA mutations recapitulated phenotypes from the genetic screen (Fig. 6B and 6C). PycA is an integral member of the “pyruvate node” encompassing the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex and PycA (Fig. 5B), which is central to growth of L. monocytogenes in both nutrient poor conditions and within a mammalian host (O'Riordan, 2003; Schar et al., 2010). c-di-AMP is a negative regulator of the pyruvate node and decreases flux from pyruvate into the TCA cycle (Sureka et al., 2014). Mutants lacking pycA, dacA, or mutants expressing the catalytically dead DacA were avirulent (Fig. 6D). We hypothesized that c-di-AMP levels modulate PycA to balance allosteric activation by acetyl-CoA during infection. Accordingly, mutations that disrupted PycA activation by acetyl-CoA suppressed the virulence defect of the ΔdacA mutant by approximately 100-fold (Fig. 6E). These data suggest a model where PycA is over-active in the absence of c-di-AMP due to activation of the protein by acetyl-CoA, which underlies the ΔdacA mutant's sensitivity to rich medium, susceptibility to β-lactam antibiotics, and virulence defects.

Figure 6. ΔdacA suppressor mutations in PycA.

Figure 6

(A) Immunoblot of PycA (biotin cofactor using streptavidin) and P60 (loading control). Data are representative of three independent experiments. (B) Enumeration of CFU on indicated media for L. monocytogenes strains constructed in LSM. “+” vs “Δ” indicate a mutation in a wild-type or dacA-deficient background. (C) Cefuroxime disk diffusion on LSM-agar of L. monocytogenes strains. (B and C) Data are the mean ± s.e.m. of at least three independent experiments. (D and E) CFU recovered from spleens 48 hours post-infection of CD-1 mice infected with 105 CFU of the indicated strains. Data are pooled results from two independent experiments of n = 5 mice, black bars indicate median, p values were calculated using a heteroscedastic Student's t-test; ** p < 0.001, ns p > 0.05.

TCA cycle intermediates are toxic to ΔdacA mutants

c-di-AMP inhibits PycA and in a dacA depletion mutant the increased production of oxaloacetate leads to an accumulation of glutamate/glutamine (Fig. 5B) (Sureka et al., 2014). Disruption of citrate synthase, the first step of the L. monocytogenes TCA cycle, is sufficient to abolish the enhanced production of glutamate/glutamine (Sureka et al., 2014). Glutamate has a well-documented role in osmoregulation (Wood, 2015), and we hypothesized that changes in glutamate levels might underlie the defects of the ΔdacA mutant for growth in rich medium and resistance to cefuroxime. Indeed, citZ mutations allowed ΔdacA to grow in rich medium and conferred resistance to cefuroxime (Fig. 7A and B). However, mutations in citB and citC, the next two steps of the TCA cycle (Fig. 5B), did not phenocopy the citZ mutation (Fig. 7A and B). These results suggest that accumulation of citrate, not downstream metabolites such as glutamate, are responsible for the observed ΔdacA phenotypes. In support of this hypothesis, the ΔdacA mutant accumulated increased intracellular citrate compared to wild-type L. monocytogenes, which was similar to ΔdacA citZ∷himar1 and ΔdacAΔpycA p-pycAR1051C (Fig. 7C).

Figure 7. TCA cycle intermediates restrict growth in the absence of c-di-AMP.

Figure 7

(A) Enumeration of CFU on indicated media for L. monocytogenes strains constructed in LSM. (B) Cefuroxime disk diffusion on LSM-agar of L. monocytogenes strains. dacA vs. ΔdacA and “+” vs “Δ” indicate a mutation in a wild-type or dacA-deficient background. (C) Intracellular citrate levels normalized to wild-type L. monocytogenes, p values were calculated using a heteroscedastic Student's t-test; * p < 0.05. All data are mean ± s.e.m of at least three independent experiments.

Discussion

Cyclic-di-AMP has emerged as a vital second messenger in many Gram-positive and some Gram-negative bacteria (Commichau et al., 2015). In L. monocytogenes the sole c-di-AMP synthase, DacA, is essential on rich medium, but not on a defined synthetic medium (Whiteley et al., 2015). To gain insight into the essential role of c-di-AMP, we extensively characterized suppressor mutations that bypassed the growth defect of the L. monocytogenes ΔdacA mutant in rich medium. Mutations in the oligopeptide transporter, oppA-F, allowed ΔdacA mutants to grow in rich medium, and peptides represented a growth restrictive medium component. Mutations in the osmoprotectant glycine-betaine transporter, gbuABC, also rescued the growth of the ΔdacA mutant, suggesting that defects in osmoregulation prevent growth in rich medium. Consistent with this hypothesis, the addition of salt rescued the growth of the ΔdacA mutant in rich medium. Deletion of genes encoding the c-di-AMP binding proteins PstA and CbpB also rescued growth; these highly conserved proteins have unknown function and remain poorly characterized. However, unlike the other suppressor mutations, ΔpstA also suppressed the extreme sensitivity of the ΔdacA mutant to the cell wall-acting antibiotic cefuroxime. Another genetic screen for suppressor mutations that allowed for growth in rich medium and in the presence of cefuroxime revealed point mutations in PycA that disrupted its activation by acetyl-CoA. Since c-di-AMP is an allosteric inhibitor of PycA, we reason that these suppressor mutations dial-down PycA activity and thereby restore metabolic homeostasis in the ΔdacA mutant. Taken together, these data suggest that c-di-AMP is necessary to couple metabolism with osmoregulation, which is important for resistance to cell-wall active antibiotics and for growth in the presence of osmolytes such as oligopeptides.

There is considerable evidence that c-di-AMP plays a major role in osmoregulation in multiple organisms. In Lactococcus lactis and L. monocytogenes, c-di-AMP-specific phosphodiesterase mutants are unable to grow in the presence of high salt concentrations (Smith et al., 2012; Zhu et al., 2015; Huynh et al., 2016). In B. subtilis, a c-di-AMP depletion mutant required the addition of sucrose for growth (Luo and Helmann, 2012). In L. monocytogenes, a dacA depletion strain lyses in rich medium, but is rescued by the addition of salt (Witte et al., 2013). Not surprisingly, c-di-AMP often controls the activity or synthesis of proteins involved in osmoregulation. For example, in S. aureus, c-di-AMP binds to and controls KtrA, a potassium importer (Corrigan et al., 2013; Kim et al., 2015), while in both L. monocytogenes and S. aureus, c-di-AMP binds to and blocks the activity of OpuCA, a carnitine importer that contributes to osmoregulation (Huynh et al., 2016; Schuster et al., 2016). In other organisms, c-di-AMP controls homologous genes (opuC, gbu, opp, and ktrA) by binding to the yuaA/ydaO riboswitch to block transcription (Block et al., 2010; Nelson et al., 2013). Our study demonstrated that the growth defects of the ΔdacA mutant were a consequence of defects in osmoregulation caused by oligopeptides in the medium. These results support the assertion of Amezaga et al. and others, that oligopeptides play a major role in L. monocytogenes osmoregulation (Maria-Rosario et al., 1995; Sleator et al., 2003). However, in the absence of c-di-AMP, oligopeptides appear to contribute to osmotic stress and inhibit growth.

c-di-AMP also plays an important role in resistance to cell wall-acting antibiotics such as cefuroxime. For example, in S. aureus, B. subtilis, L. monocytogenes, E. faecalis, and S. pyogenes, mutants in c-di-AMP-dependent phosphodiesterase are more resistant to cell wall-acting antibiotics (Griffiths and O'Neill, 2011; Luo and Helmann, 2012; Witte et al., 2013; Cho and Kang, 2013; Miller et al., 2013). As shown in this study, ΔdacA mutants are extremely sensitive to cefuroxime, yet no direct interactions between c-di-AMP and cell wall-associated enzymes have been identified. Interestingly, dacA is in an operon with glmM, which encodes phosphoglucosamine mutase, an enzyme important for amino sugar incorporation into peptidoglycan (Mengin-Lecreulx and van Heijenoort, 1996; Barreteau et al., 2008). DacA interacts with GlmM in multiple organisms (Gundlach et al., 2015b; Rismondo et al., 2016), and GlmM inhibited DacA in L. lactis (Zhu et al., 2015). Therefore, it is reasonable to postulate that DacA may also inhibit GlmM to alter the abundance of peptidoglycan precursors. However, in this study a point mutation in the DacA active site was sufficient to render L. monocytogenes sensitive to cefuroxime, and while we cannot rule out a reciprocal DacA inhibition of GlmM, these data failed to demonstrate a role for DacA protein in cefuroxime resistance independent of c-di-AMP. We speculate that the ΔdacA mutant is extremely sensitive to cefuroxime as a consequence of defects in osmoregulation, although direct effects of c-di-AMP on cell wall biosynthesis and peptidoglycan crosslinking, as has been suggested in S. aureus (Corrigan et al., 2011), cannot be excluded.

The most striking result in this study was that single amino acid mutations in PycA that block allosteric activation by acetyl-CoA restored growth, osmoregulation, cefuroxime resistance, and virulence. Pyruvate carboxylase is an evolutionarily ancient enzyme conserved in many different clades of bacteria, Archaea, and mammals (where it is located in the mitochondria) (Jitrapakdee et al., 2008). In humans, mutations affecting pyruvate carboxylase expression or activity disrupt gluconeogenesis and result in mitochondrial diseases such as lactic acidosis, hypoglycemia, and mental retardation (Robinson, 2006). One such mutation found in humans (R451C) is similar to the two pycA mutations investigated here (R367L/R1051C) that suppress ΔdacA phenotypes (Wexler et al., 1998). Interactions between these arginine residues and acetyl-CoA are proposed to cause a conformational change in the PycA biotin carboxylase domain dimer, activating biotin carboxylase activity through a yet unknown mechanism (Yu et al., 2009). The R367L mutation may correspond to an intermediate form of the activated confirmation because despite being unaffected by acetyl-CoA, R367L is more active than wild-type enzyme without ligand. Since PstA mutations have the same phenotype as the PycA suppressor mutations, it is conceivable that PstA interacts with PycA. However, neither co-IP or addition of recombinant PstA into PycA enzyme assays demonstrated any interaction (data not shown). Alternatively, PstA may interact with the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDHC) that catalyzes acetyl-CoA production from pyruvate and was identified in both yeast 2-hybrid and PstA pull-downs (Data not shown). Perhaps PstA activates PDHC and the increased acetyl-CoA activates PycA. However, this has not been experimentally confirmed and biochemistry with the massive PDHC complex (estimated at >4 mega daltons) is challenging (Mattevi et al., 1992).

c-di-AMP appears to regulate pyruvate carboxylase in L. monocytogenes to balance allosteric activation by acetyl-CoA. Hyper-activity of PycA that occurs in the absence of c-di-AMP leads to increased flux through the oxidative branch of the TCA cycle, resulting in the increased production of glutamate/glutamine (Sureka et al., 2014). Mutations in citZ rescue the growth of ΔdacA mutants and decrease levels of glutamate/glutamine, suggesting that their accumulation is toxic. Unexpectedly, in this study, mutations of genes downstream of CitZ did not restore growth of the ΔdacA mutants. We suggest that accumulation of citrate (or a downstream metabolite other than isocitrate or glutamate/glutamine) causes osmotic stress and inhibits growth in the absence of c-di-AMP. Citrate can modulate osmosis through an intrinsic affinity for water molecules, which has been utilized for osmotic water purification by coupling citrate to beads and for osmotically-induced diarrhea where magnesium citrate is used clinically (Schiller, 1999; Na et al., 2014). In addition, citrate has direct roles in bacterial metabolism as an inhibitor of phosphofructokinase (Sonenshein et al., 2015), a chelator of iron and other divalent cations (Pechter et al., 2013), and as an allosteric regulator of CcpC, a transcriptional activator/inhibitor of citCZ and citB in B. subtilis and L. monocytogenes (Sonenshein, 2007; Mittal et al., 2012). Of note, ccpC is encoded in an operon with cbpB, although the relevance of this organization has not been investigated.

The stimuli that alter c-di-AMP levels are poorly defined. However, cross regulation between c-di-AMP and (p)ppGpp has demonstrated that (p)ppGpp inhibits both PdeA and PgpH (Huynh and Woodward, 2016), which predicts that c-di-AMP levels increase during starvation. This nucleotide crosstalk may explain why L. monocytogenes and E. faecalis mutants unable to regulate (p)ppGpp are unable to survive osmotic stress and are more sensitive to β-lactam antibiotics (Okada et al., 2002; Abranches et al., 2009; Yan et al., 2009). Conversely, depletion of c-di-AMP in L. monocytogenes and high levels of c-di-AMP in L. monocytogenes and S. aureus lead to an increase in (p)ppGpp (Liu et al., 2006; Corrigan et al., 2015; Whiteley et al., 2015). The stress that induces the stringent response when c-di-AMP levels are altered has not been characterized and while changes in metabolism are one possibility there is also evidence in the literature that alterations in osmotic pressure might affect (p)ppGpp levels (Yan et al., 2009). Progress in understanding how c-di-AMP levels are regulated will be aided in the future by continued development of nucleotide biosensors (Kellenberger et al., 2015) and by studying regulation of c-di-AMP synthases and hydrolases.

Although c-di-AMP is clearly an allosteric regulator of metabolic function, we discovered it as a secreted L. monocytogenes activator of host innate immunity and there is evidence that it is also secreted by both Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Chlamydia trachomatis during infection (Woodward et al., 2010; Barker et al., 2013; Yang et al., 2014; Dey et al., 2015). It remains a mystery why bacteria secrete c-di-AMP, although it has been suggested that secretion may represent an additional level of regulation (Huynh and Woodward, 2016). Since c-di-AMP is secreted through multidrug efflux pumps that are activated by toxic compounds such as bile (Quillin et al., 2011), perhaps secretion provides a mechanism to couple the response to noxious compounds with metabolic regulation. Alternatively, c-di-AMP secretion may occur in response to osmotic stress during infection. In multiple organisms, c-di-AMP clearly regulates potassium transport (Nelson et al., 2013; Peng et al., 2015; Moscoso et al., 2015). Since both bacterial and host cells maintain high extracellular sodium levels and high intracellular potassium concentrations, the transition of L. monocytogenes from the environment to the cytosol of a macrophage involves a large increase in potassium, which might lead to c-di-AMP secretion that inadvertently triggers a host innate immune response.

Experimental Procedures

Ethics statement

This study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All protocols were reviewed and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of California, Berkeley (AUP-2016-05-8811).

Bacterial culture conditions

The L. monocytogenes strains used in this study (Table 2) were derived from wild-type 10403S (Becavin et al., 2014), were maintained in brain heart infusion (BHI, Difco) for dacA+ strains, and were maintained on Listeria synthetic media (LSM) for dacA- strains, in 1-3 mL of media in 14 mL (17 × 100 mm) culture tubes, at 37°C while shaking at 220 rpm, unless specified otherwise. “Overnight” bacterial cultures were defined as 16-20 hrs post-inoculation with a single colony. The tryptic digest of casein (Tryptone, US Biotech Sources, BTS) was catalog #T01PD-500. The E. coli strains used in this study (Table 3) were used for propagating plasmids and conjugation and maintained in Lysogeny Broth (LB, Miller) at 37°C while shaking. Antibiotics were used at the following concentrations: carbenicillin (100 μg/mL, Gold Biotechnology), streptomycin (200 μg/mL, Sigma), chloramphenicol (7.5 μg/mL for L. monocytogenes and 10 μg/mL for E. coli, Sigma), erythromycin (1 μg/mL, Sigma), kanamycin (15 μg/mL in LSM, 30 μg/mL in BHI, Gold Biotechnology), and tetracycline (2 μg/mL, Sigma). All bacterial strains were frozen at -80°C in either BHI or LSM, with 40% glycerol.

Table 2. L. monocytogenes strains used in this study.

DP number Straina Description Reference
10403S Wild-type L. monocytogenes (Becavin et al., 2014)
DP-L6325 ΔdacA-kanR.MM1 Marked deletion of dacA (lmo2120), constructed on previous minimal medium (Whiteley et al., 2015)
DP-L6378 ΔdacA-kanR Marked deletion of dacA, constructed on LSM, made by transducing with DP-L6325 This study
DP-L6412 ΔdacA-kanR tRNAArg∷pLIV2.tcR-dacA DP-L6378 integrated with plasmid from DP-E6543 This study
DP-L6413 ΔdacA-kanR tRNAArg∷pPL2t-pH2-disA DP-L6378 integrated with plasmid from DP-E6397 This study
DP-L6390 dacAD171A Chromosomal, catalytically dead, dacA point mutation made using DP-E6389 This study
DP-L6414 dacAD171A tRNAArg∷pLIV2.tcR-dacA DP-L6390 integrated with plasmid from DP-E6543 This study
DP-L6530 dacAD171A tRNAArg∷pPL2t-pH2-disA DP-L6390 integrated with plasmid from DP-E6397 This study
DP-L6291 relAR295S relA suppressor allele reconstructed in wild-type (Whiteley et al., 2015)
DP-L6383 ΔdacA-kanR relAR295S DP-L6291 transduced with lysate from DP-L6378 This study
DP-L6539 ΔdacA relAR295S tRNAArg∷pPL2t-relA DP-L6383 integrated with plasmid from DP-E6334 This study
DP-L6272 ΔoppB In-frame deletion of oppB (lmo2195) (Whiteley et al., 2015)
DP-L6542 ΔdacA-kanR ΔoppB DP-L6272 transduced with lysate from DP-L6378 This study
DP-L6346 ΔcbpB In frame deletion of cbpB (lmo1009), made using DP-E6343 This study
DP-L6380 ΔdacA-kanR ΔcbpB DP-L6346 transduced with lysate from DP-L6378 This study
DP-L6534 ΔdacA-kanR ΔcbpB tRNAArg∷pPL2t-pH-cbpB DP-L6380 integrated with plasmid from DP-E6408 This study
DP-L6347 ΔpstA In frame deletion of pstA (lmo2692), made using DP-E6344 This study
DP-L6381 ΔdacA-kanR ΔpstA DP-L6347 transduced with lysate from DP-L6378 This study
DP-L6386 ΔdacA-kanR ΔpstA tRNAArg∷pPL2t-pH-pstA-SII DP-L6381 with integrated plasmid from DP-E6376 This study
DP-L6384 ΔdacA-kanR tRNAArg∷pPL2t-pH-pstA DP-L6378 with integrated plasmid from DP-E6375 This study
DP-L6394 ΔgbuABC In frame deletion of gbu operon (lmo1014-1016), made using DP-E6387 This study
DP-L6395 ΔgbuABC ΔdacA-kanR DP-L6394 transduced with lysate from DP-L6378 This study
DP-L6531 ΔdacA-kanR ΔgbuABC tRNAArg∷pPL2t-gbuABC DP-L6396 integrated with plasmid from DP-E6406 This study
DP-L6348 ΔpycA In frame deletion of pycA (lmo1072), made with DP-E6345 This study
DP-L6399 ΔpycA tRNAArg∷pPL2t-pycA DP-L6348 integrated with plasmid from DP-E6398 This study
DP-L6400 ΔdacA-kanR ΔpycA tRNAArg∷pPL2t-pycA DP-L6399 transduced with lysate from DP-L6378 This study
DP-L6535 ΔpycA tRNAArg∷pPL2t-pycAR1051C DP-L6348 integrated with plasmid from DP-E6410 This study
DP-L6536 ΔdacA-kanR ΔpycA tRNAArg∷pPL2t-pycAR1051C DP-L6535 transduced with lysate from DP-L6378 This study
DP-L6537 ΔpycA tRNAArg∷pPL2t-pycAR367L DP-L6348 integrated with plasmid from DP-E6411 This study
DP-L6538 ΔdacA-kanR ΔpycA tRNAArg∷pPL2t-pycAR367L DP-L6537 transduced with lysate from DP-L6378 This study
DP-L6403 citC∷himar Transposon mutation in citC (LMRG_01401∷471, lmo1566) (Reniere et al., 2016)
DP-L6404 ΔdacA-kanR citC∷himar1 DP-L6403 transduced with lysate from DP-L6378 This study
DP-L6540 ΔcitB In frame deletion of citB (lmo1641), made with DP-E6409 This study
DP-L6541 ΔdacA-kanR ΔcitB DP-L6540 transduced with lysate from DP-L6378 This study
DP-L6401 citZ∷himar1 Transposon mutation in citZ (LMRG_01400∷143, lmo1567) (Sureka et al., 2014)
DP-L6402 ΔdacA-kanR citZ∷himar1 DP-L6401 transduced with lysate from DP-L6378 This study
DP-L6533 ΔdacA-kanR citZ∷himar1 tRNAArg∷pPL2t-citZC DP-L6402 integrated with plasmid from DP-E6407 This study
a

The ΔdacA-kanR marked deletion nomenclature has been simplified in the body of paper as “ΔdacA

Table 3. E. coli strains and plasmids used in this study.

DP number Description Reference
XL1-Blue Cloning; recA1 endA1 gyrA96 thi-1 hsdR17 supE44 relA1 lac [F′ proAB lacIqZΔM15 Tn10 (Tetr)] Stratagene
SM10 Conjugation; thi-1 thr-1 leuB6 tonA21 lacY1 supE44 recA λ- integrated [RP4-2-Tcr∷Mu] aphA+ (Kmr) Tra+ (Simon et al., 1983)
DP-E6333 pPL2t, a derivative of pPL2 tetracycline resistant in L. monocytogenes (Whiteley et al., 2015)
DP-E6340 pKSV7-oriT (Camilli et al., 1993)
DP-E6543 pLIV2t-dacA (lmo2120) (Witte et al., 2013)
DP-E6397 pPL2t-pH1-disA (BSU00880) This study
DP-E6389 pKSV7-dacAD171A (lmo2120) This study
DP-E6334 pPL2t-relA (Whiteley et al., 2015)
DP-E6343 pKSV7-ΔcbpB (lmo1009) This study
DP-E6408 pPL2t-cbpB This study
DP-E6344 pKSV7-ΔpstA (lmo2692) This study
DP-E6376 pPL2t-pH3-pstA-SII This study
DP-E6375 pPL2t-pH3-pstA This study
DP-E6387 pKSV7-ΔgbuABC (lmo1014-1016) This study
DP-E6406 pPL2t-gbuABC This study
JW363 pET28a-pycA (Sureka et al., 2014)
DP-E6345 pKSV7-ΔpycA (lmo1072) This study
DP-E6398 pPL2t-pycA This study
DP-E6410 pPL2t-pycAR1051C This study
DP-E6411 pPL2t-pycAR367L This study
DP-E6409 pKSV7-ΔcitB (lmo1641) This study
DP-E6407 pPL2t-citZC (lmo1567-1566) This study

Listeria synthetic medium

The LSM recipe was devised by starting with previously published defined media (Welshimer, 1963; Premaratne et al., 1991; Phan-Thanh and Gormon, 1997). First, the excess riboflavin was removed, and the phosphate buffer was reduced and replaced with MOPS, as noted for a more minimal defined media (Tsai and Hodgson, 2003). By using MOPS the medium no longer precipitated at 2× concentration, presumably due to decreased formation of insoluble phosphate salts, making the medium more suitable for media-agar. Iron citrate was replaced with iron chloride and decreased to 50 μM without effects on growth. By comparison to B. subtilis defined (SD) media (Vasantha and Freese, 1980), salts of manganese, zinc, and calcium were included as trace metals. In addition, other trace metals, citrate (to keep metals in solution), and additional salt were added based on other published defined media. Finally, multiple stock solutions were combined for simplicity with no observed problems.

LSM was prepared by combining 8 individual concentrated stock solutions (prepared ahead of time and stored at 4 °C) with fresh glutamine and cysteine, see table S1. Stock solutions were filter sterilized and stored at 4 °C, with the exception of MOPS, Glucose, and Phosphate which were stored at room temperature. Each stock was added at the appropriate dilution factor and in the order listed in table S1, dissolving glutamine and cysteine immediately prior to filter sterilization. The final LSM is stable at 2× concentration and for approximately 6-8 weeks. LSM may be prepared from an amino acid stock solution with either the “minimum” 8 amino acids that are important for L. monocytogenes growth or the remaining 18 amino acids (other than glutamine and cysteine, which are added fresh). These stocks are referred to as “minimum” amino acid stock (used to make iLSM) or “complete” amino acid stock (used to make cLSM). Including all amino acids resulted in much faster, robust growth but may be inappropriate for some metabolic studies. In this work only cLSM was used and referred to as “LSM”.

LSM-agar plates are prepared by combining stock solutions with the fresh ingredients to a final 2× concentration, filter-sterilized, warmed to 37°C, combined with an equal volume of molten autoclave-sterilized 2× agarose (10 g/L at 1×), and poured at 15 mL/plate. Agarose must be used, not agar, which is not sufficiently pure. It is recommended that the LSM-agarose be kept warm (>55°C) while preparing the plates.

Plasmid construction and cloning

DNA manipulations and cloning were performed as previously described (Whiteley et al., 2015). Briefly, vectors were constructed by either Gibson assembly using the Gibson Assembly Ultra (Synthetic Genomics) according to manufacturer's instructions or by restriction digest and DNA ligation, see associate oligonucleotide description (Table S2). Unless otherwise stated, all reagents and kits were from New England Biolabs. PCR was performed using Kapa HiFi polymerase (Kapa Biosystems) and all vectors were transformed into XL1-Blue for construction.

All knock-in vectors were constructed by ligating recombinant DNA into the multiple cloning site of pPL2t 5′ of the B. subtilis rrnB transcriptional terminator. pPL2t is a derivative of the integration vector pPL2 that provides chloramphenicol resistance in E. coli and tetracycline resistance in L. monocytogenes (Lauer et al., 2002; Whiteley et al., 2015). The vectors pPL2t-cbpB, pPL2t-gbuABC, pPL2t-pycA, pPL2t-pycAR1051C, pPL2t-pycAR367L, and pPL2t-citZC were constructed by amplifying each complemented gene with its endogenous promoter(s) (see Table S2), as annotated (Wurtzel et al., 2012). Wild-type gDNA was used as a template with the exception of the pycA mutants, where suppressor mutant gDNA was used instead. The vector pPL2t-oppAB (lmo2196-5) was constructed such that the promoter of oppA could read-through the oppA coding sequence to oppB, which is important for sufficient oppB expression (Borezee et al., 2000). This vector was difficult to construct and Sanger sequencing revealed multiple mutations and IS elements disrupting oppA that lead to insufficient oppB expression. The oppA gene appears toxic to E. coli and thus a complement vector for oppB could not be constructed. The vectors pPL2t-pH1-disA, pPL2t-pH2-pstA-SII, and pPL2t-pH2-pstA were constructed by fusing the gene of interest to a constitutive promoter. The Pspac-hy (Phyper) promoter was selected as the basic promoter and lacO sites were added on either side of the core promoter sequence to decrease expression in E. coli. Twenty nucleotides of the actA UTR were used for the ribosomal binding site. Variations were made to these sequences to optimize expression. pH1 corresponds to “aattgtgagcgctcacaattttgcaaaaagttgttgactttatctacaaggtgtggcataatgtgtgtaatTATGAGCGCTCACAATTCTCGAGAGCGTATCACGAGGAGggagtcgac” prior to the ATG of disA, and pH2 corresponds to “aattttgcaaaaagttgttgactttatctacaaggtgtggcataatgtgtgtagcgtatcacgaggagggagtataa” prior to the TTG of pstA; both promoters were synthesized as gBLOCKS (IDT) and pre-inserted into pPL2t. The amino acid sequence for the strep(II) tag was “AAASWSHPQFEK” and the nucleotide sequence was “gcggccgcaagctggAGCCATCCACAATTCGAAAAATAA”.

All knock-out vectors were constructed by ligating recombinant DNA in the multiple cloning site of the suicide vector pKSV7-OriT (Smith and Youngman, 1992; Camilli et al., 1993; Kline et al., 2015). The DNA fragment constructed for in-frame deletions consisted of 1-0.75 kb of amplified genomic DNA 5′ (using primers A&B) and 3′ (using primers C&D) of the deleted gene (see Table S2). Sequence overlap extension (SOE) PCR was used to join the two upstream and downstream fragments, maintaining the first and last six codons of the deleted gene. For allelic exchange of the dacAD171A mutation, the aspartate codon (GAT) was mutated to alanine (GCG) using SOE PCR.

Although all L. monocytogenes strains used were a derivative of 10403S, by convention, genes are referred to by the EGD-e ordered loci names. For reference: dacA, lmo2120, LMRG_01274; oppB, lmo2195, LMRG_01637; relA, lmo1523, LMRG_01447; gbuA, lmo1014, LMRG_02114; pstA, lmo2692, LMRG_02239; cbpB, lmo1009, LMRG_02109; pycA, lmo1072, LMRG_00534; citZ, lmo1567, LMRG_01400; citC, lmo1566, LMRG_01401; citB, lmo1641, LMRG_01325.

L. monocytogenes strain construction

Strains were constructed by standard methods (Reniere et al., 2016). Plasmids were introduced to L. monocytogenes by transconjugation using donor E. coli SM10 and the appropriate L. monocytogenes recipient strain by standard methods (Simon et al., 1983; Burke et al., 2014). Chemically competent E. coli SM10 were first transformed with either pPL2t-based or pKSV7-OriT-based plasmids and mixed 1:1 with the appropriate L. monocytogenes recipient strain on non-selective solid media for 4-24 hours. Successful trans-conjugates were selected by streaking donor/recipient mixture on selective solid media containing streptomycin (to select against E. coli) and either tetracycline (for pPL2t) at 37°C or chloramphenicol (for pKSV7-OriT) at 30°C. Single colonies appeared in 24-48 hours, were selected, re-streaked on the appropriate selective media/temperature, and single colonies were again isolated. The resulting knock-in strains were stable and not maintained on antibiotics after initial construction. The resulting pKSV7-OriT trans-conjugate was then re-streaked onto solid media containing streptomycin and chloramphenicol at the 42°C, a temperature that is non-permissive for plasmid DNA replication. Single colonies appeared in 24-48 hours and were purified by re-streaking twice, sequentially, in the same selective conditions. The resulting L. monocytogenes strain harbored an integrated pKSV7-OriT and was inoculated into non-selective media at 30 °C (the temperature permissive for pKSV7-OriT replication) to enrich for strains where the plasmid had excised from the chromosome and been cured from the strain. Under these conditions bacteria were cultured sequentially 4-8 times, inoculating with approximately 107 colony forming units (cfu) into 2 mL of non-selective media at 30°C. Successful excision of pKSV7 from the chromosome was screened for by patch-plating for chloramphenicol sensitive strains, then screened by PCR for successful allelic exchange. Strains were confirmed by a second round of PCR using A and D primers for the KO of interest and, when necessary, Sanger sequenced.

See table 2, L. monocytogenes strains used in this study, for details of strain construction. dacA was deleted by transducing (see section on Generalized Transduction) a ΔdacA deletion marked with a kanamycin resistance gene (kanR) as previously described (Whiteley et al., 2015) in LSM. The resulting strains were re-streaked for single colonies in LSM + kanamycin. The ΔdacA-kanR marked deletion nomenclature was simplified in the body of this paper to “ΔdacA”. When dacA mutant strains were complemented, conjugation and integration of pPL2t was performed on LSM + tetracycline. When allelic exchange was performed for the dacAD171A mutation, the passages at 30°C in non-selective media were performed in LSM and plated on LSM-agar.

Immunoblots

Immunoblots were performed as previously described (Reniere et al., 2015). Briefly, bacteria overnight cultures were diluted 1:10 into media, incubated for two hours (BHI) or four hours (LSM) at 37°C while shaking (for isolation of log-phase cultures), and 1 OD of bacteria was harvested by centrifuge after adjusting the volume for OD normalization. The cells were washed once in PBS, resuspended in 0.1% NP-40 with 1 mM PMSF, and lysed by bead beating for 20 min with approximately 100 μL of 0.1 mm Zirconia/Silica beads (BioSpec). The lysate was centrifuged for >30 min and the supernatant was treated with TCA to 10% for one hour at -20 °C. The protein pellet was collected by centrifugation and washed twice with ice-cold acetone, followed by air-drying the protein pellet. The pellet was resuspended in 50 μl LDS (Invitrogen) with 5% BME, boiled for 20 min, and analyzed by SDS-PAGE.

Primary antibody against P60 (mouse, monoclonal, Adipogen) was used at a 1:5,000 dilution and DacA (rabbit anti-sera, a generous gift of Fabian Commichau) was used as previously reported (Rismondo et al., 2016). P60 is a loading control and is constitutively expressed. For secondary antibodies, fluorophores conjugated to goat anti-mouse, goat anti-rabbit, or streptavidin (Licor) were used according to manufacturer's instructions. Immunoblots were visualized and quantified using an Odyssey Imager.

Disk diffusions

Disk diffusions were performed as previously described (Durack et al., 2015), with the following changes. Approximately 107 CFU from an overnight culture were diluted in 3 mL of molten top-agar (0.8% agarose, 0.8% NaCl) and evenly spread over LSM-agar plates. After the agar had solidified, Whatman paper disks soaked in 125 μg of cefuroxime or 50 μg of bialaphos (Gold Biotechnology), unless specified otherwise, were placed on top of the bacteria-agarose layer. The zone of inhibition was measured as area by imaging plates after 48 hours of incubation at 37 °C and quantifying using ImageJ software (Schneider et al., 2012).

Quantification of mutant growth in various media and synthetic peptides

Overnight cultures in LSM were serially diluted in a 96-well plate 1:10 with PBS, ranging from 10-1 to 10-8. 5 μL of each culture-dilution were spotted on solid media plates using a multichannel pipette. Plates were imaged and CFU per dilution were quantified for LSM, BHI, and LSM + 1% w/v tryptone after 48 hours at 37 °C.

For synthetic peptides, 0.0075 g hexapeptide (0.25% w/v final concentration, 4.48 mM for KAAAAK and 3.44 mM for KLLLLK) or 0.03 g dipeptide (1% w/v final concentration, 46 mM for AQ) were dissolved in 1.5 mL 2× LSM and the LSM-peptide product was filter-sterilized (0.2 μm). Specific peptides were: KAAAAK (MW=558.68 g mol-1 >61% pure, Mimotopes), KLLLLK (MW=727.00 g mol-1 >72% pure, Mimotopes), and AQ (MW=217.22 g mol-1 >98% pure, Sigma). Lysines on N and C termini of hexapeptides were added to increase solubility. The LSM-peptide mixture was then warmed to 37 °C, combined with 1.5 mL molten autoclave-sterilized 2× agarose, and distributed into 6-well (9.5 cm2 well-1) tissue culture dishes (Corning) at 2.5 ml well-1. Overnight cultures in LSM were serially diluted in a 96-well plate 1:10 with PBS, ranging from 10-1 to 10-7. For strains able to grow in the presence of tryptone, 5 μL of culture-dilution at 10-5, 10-6, and 10-7 were spotted on the media-agar in wells using a multichannel pipette. For strains unable to grow in the presence of tryptone, 5 μL of culture-dilutions 10-1, 10-2, and 10-3 were spotted likewise. All strains, including wild-type L. monocytogenes, grew more slowly when synthetic peptides were added to the media. Thus in experiments comparing growth in media containing synthetic peptides, dishes were imaged and CFU were enumerated after 72 hours at 37 °C, including LSM and BHI controls.

Generalized transduction

Generalized transductions were performed as previously described (Zemansky et al., 2009). Briefly, phage was cultivated from donor L. monocytogenes strains that were cultured overnight at 30°C, without shaking, and tilted slightly. 1 mL of overnight culture was pelleted and resuspended in 1 mL fresh LMC (LB broth, 10 mM CaCl2, 10 mM MgSO4), diluted 1:100 into 4 ml of molten LB Top-Agar with phage (0.7% agar, LB broth, 10 mM CaCl2, 10 mM MgSO4, approximately 106 PFU of ΦU153 (Hodgson, 2000)) and spread over LB-agar plates. After 24 hours at 30°C, 5 mL of TM buffer (10 mM Tris, 10 mM MgSO4, pH 7.5) was added to the plates and incubated at room temperature overnight (>6 hours) to “soak out” phage. The phage lysate was collected filter sterilized. The following day, a recipient strain overnight culture was harvested and approximately 5×108 recipient bugs were resuspended in 100 μL LMC and 10 μL of the phage lysate was added (approximately 107 PFU of phage). After incubating for 30 min at room temperature, the mixture was spread over selective solid media. himar1 transposons (erythromycin resistant) were recovered after 48 hours at 37°C, ΔdacA-kanR transductants were recovered 48 hours at 37°C on LSM plus kanamycin, single colonies were re-streaked on selective solid media and, when necessary, confirmed by PCR/Sanger sequencing. When phage lysate for ΔdacA-kanR was made, all LB and selective media were replaced with LSM and LSM was used in place of LMC. ΦU153 was propagated on the hyper-susceptible strain SLCC-5764 a.k.a. “MACK”.

ΔdacA p-pstA suppressor generation and identification

Overnight cultures of ΔdacA p-pstA were plated on LSM containing 150 μg/ml cefuroxime (approximately 10× the MIC of ΔdacA, determined as previously described (McKay and Portnoy, 2015)). Cefuroxime-resistant colonies were isolated, cultured in LSM, and dilutions were spot-plated on BHI plates. Resistance to cefuroxime was verified by antibiotic disk diffusion on LSM and compared to ΔdacA mutants. Mutants identified in this screen were genome sequenced as previously described (Burke and Portnoy, 2016). Briefly, mutants were cultured overnight in 5 mL of LSM and genomic DNA was extracted (MasterPure Gram Positive DNA Purification Kit, Epicentre) according to manufacturer's instructions. gDNA was then submitted for library preparation and Illumina sequencing (single read 50) at the UC Berkeley QB3 Genomics Sequencing Laboratory using. Data was assembled and aligned to the 10403S reference genome (GenBank: GCA_000168695.2) demonstrating >50× coverage. SNP/InDel/structural variations from the wild-type strain were determined (CLC Genomics Workbench, CLC bio).

Pyruvate carboxylase purification and enzyme assay

The wild-type PycA protein was expressed and purified as previously described (Sureka et al., 2014). pycA mutations were made using the QuikChange kit (Stratagene) and confirmed by Sanger DNA sequencing. The mutant alleles were expressed and purified using the same protocol as the wild-type protein. The catalytic activities of wild-type and mutant proteins were assessed based on a published protocol (Modak and Kelly, 1995), which couples oxaloacetate production to the oxidation of NADH by malate dehydrogenase (Sigma), followed spectrophotometrically by the decrease in absorbance at 340 nm. The activity was measured at room temperature in a reaction mixture containing 100 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 200 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM NaHCO3, 50 mM (NH4)2SO4, 5 units of malate dehydrogenase, 4 mM NADH, 5 mM pyruvate, 2 mM ATP, and 1 μM PycA (based on the monomer). The reaction was initiated by addition of ATP.

In vivo infections

Mouse models of infection were performed as previously described (Rae et al., 2011; Archer et al., 2014), with the following alterations. CD-1 mice were purchased from Charles River and infected at 8-12 weeks of age with 105 CFU of L. monocytogenes intravenously (i.v.) via the tail-vein. Mice were euthanized 48 hours post-infection, organs were homogenized in 0.1% IGEPAL CA-630 (Sigma), and dilutions were plated in LSM for all strains except ΔpycA, which does not grow on LSM and instead was plated on BHI.

Citrate quantification

Bacterial strains were diluted from overnight culture into fresh LSM at an initial OD of approximately 0.1 and cultured to mid-log (OD600=1.0) in LSM (250 mL flask without baffles, 25 mL of media, 220 rpm shaking, 37 °C), harvested bacteria were washed in PBS, resuspended in an equal volume of citrate assay buffer (see below), and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Bacteria were then thawed and lysed by bead-beating using 0.1 mm Zirconia/Silica beads (BioSpec) for 15 minutes. Citrate concentrations were determined using Citrate Assay Kit (Sigma) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Statistical Analysis

Statistics were performed as previously described (Mitchell et al., 2015), with the following alterations. Where appropriate data were compared using a 2-tailed heteroscedastic Students t-test.

Supplementary Material

Supp DataS1

Figure S1. Complementation of suppressor mutations Enumeration of CFU on indicated media for L. monocytogenes strains constructed in LSM. Data are mean ± s.e.m of at least three independent experiments and the p value was calculated using a heteroscedastic Student's t-test; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.001, ns p > 0.05.

Figure S2. Opp activity and growth ΔdacA suppressor mutants in media containing oligopeptides Bialaphos, a tripeptide antibiotic, disk diffusion on LSM-agar. (B) Enumeration of CFU on indicated media for L. monocytogenes strains constructed in LSM. All data are mean ± s.e.m of at least three independent experiments.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Alex Pollock and Regina Matthew for technical assistance, Jonathan Portman for assistance with synthetic peptides, Michelle Reniere for critical reading of the manuscript, Bevin English and Anita Sil for sharing the yeast 2-hybrid reagents, and Fabian Commichau for generously providing the DacA/CdaA anti-sera. This work used the Vincent J. Coates Genomics Sequencing Laboratory at UC Berkeley, supported by National Institutes of Health S10 Instrumentation grants S10RR029668 and S10RR027303. This work was also supported by National Institutes of Health grants 1P01 AI063302 and 1R01 AI27655 to D.A.P.; A.T.W. was supported by the University of California, Berkeley Center for Emerging and Neglected Diseases Irving H. Wiesenfeld Graduate Fellowship; A.T.W. and B.N.P. were supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program DGE 1106400; L.T. and P.H.C. are supported by National Institutes of Health grant 1R01 AI116669; and JJW is supported by National Institutes of Health grant 1R01 AI116669 and a Biomedical Scholarship from the Pew Charitable Trust. Daniel A. Portnoy has a consulting relationship with and a financial interest in Aduro Biotech, and both he and the company stand to benefit from the commercialization of this research.

References

  1. Abranches J, Martinez AR, Kajfasz JK, Chavez V, Garsin DA, Lemos JA. The Molecular Alarmone (p)ppGpp Mediates Stress Responses, Vancomycin Tolerance, and Virulence in Enterococcus faecalis. J Bacteriol. 2009;191:2248–2256. doi: 10.1128/JB.01726-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Archer KA, Durack J, Portnoy DA. STING-Dependent Type I IFN Production Inhibits Cell-Mediated Immunity to Listeria monocytogenes. PLoS Pathogens. 2014;10:e1003861. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barker JR, Koestler BJ, Carpenter VK, Burdette DL, Waters CM, Vance RE, Valdivia RH. STING-Dependent Recognition of Cyclic di-AMP Mediates Type I Interferon Responses during Chlamydia trachomatis Infection. mBio. 2013;4:e00018–13–e00018–13. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00018-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barreteau H, Kovac A, Boniface A, Sova M, Gobec S, Blanot D. Cytoplasmic steps of peptidoglycan biosynthesis. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2008;32:168–207. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00104.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Becavin C, Bouchier C, Lechat P, Archambaud C, Creno S, Gouin E, et al. Comparison of Widely Used Listeria monocytogenes Strains EGD, 10403S, and EGD-e Highlights Genomic Differences Underlying Variations in Pathogenicity. mBio. 2014;5:e00969–14–e00969–14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00969-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Block KF, Hammond MC, Breaker RR. Evidence for Widespread Gene Control Function by the ydaO Riboswitch Candidate. J Bacteriol. 2010;192:3983–3989. doi: 10.1128/JB.00450-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Borezee E, Pellegrini E, Berche P. OppA of Listeria monocytogenes, an Oligopeptide-Binding Protein Required for Bacterial Growth at Low Temperature and Involved in Intracellular Survival. Infect Immun. 2000;68:7069–7077. doi: 10.1128/iai.68.12.7069-7077.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Burke TP, Portnoy DA. SpoVG Is a Conserved RNA-Binding Protein That Regulates Listeria monocytogenes Lysozyme Resistance, Virulence, and Swarming Motility. mBio. 2016;7:e00240–16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00240-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Burke TP, Loukitcheva A, Zemansky J, Wheeler R, Boneca IG, Portnoy DA. Listeria monocytogenes Is Resistant to Lysozyme through the Regulation, Not the Acquisition, of Cell Wall-Modifying Enzymes. J Bacteriol. 2014;196:3756–3767. doi: 10.1128/JB.02053-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Camilli A, Tilney LG, Portnoy DA. Dual roles of plcA in Listeria monocytogenes pathogenesis. Molecular Microbiology. 1993;8:143–157. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01211.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Campeotto I, Zhang Y, Mladenov MG, Freemont PS, Gründling A. Complex Structure and Biochemical Characterization of the Staphylococcus aureus Cyclic Diadenylate Monophosphate (c-di-AMP)-binding Protein PstA, the Founding Member of a New Signal Transduction Protein Family. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2015;290:2888–2901. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.621789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cheng X, Zheng X, Zhou X, Zeng J, Ren Z, Xu X, et al. Regulation of oxidative response and extracellular polysaccharide synthesis by a diadenylate cyclase in Streptococcus mutans. Environ Microbiol. 2015;18:904–922. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cho KH, Kang SO. Streptococcus pyogenes c-di-AMP Phosphodiesterase, GdpP, Influences SpeB Processing and Virulence. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e69425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Choi PH, Sureka K, Woodward JJ, Tong L. Molecular basis for the recognition of cyclic-di-AMP by PstA, a P II-like signal transduction protein. MicrobiologyOpen. 2015;4:361–374. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Commichau FM, Dickmanns A, Gundlach J, Ficner R, Stülke J. A jack of all trades: the multiple roles of the unique essential second messenger cyclic di-AMP. Molecular Microbiology. 2015;97:189–204. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Corrigan RM, Abbott JC, Burhenne H, Kaever V, Gründling A. c-di-AMP Is a New Second Messenger in Staphylococcus aureus with a Role in Controlling Cell Size and Envelope Stress. PLoS Pathogens. 2011;7:e1002217. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Corrigan RM, Gründling A. Cyclic di-AMP: another second messenger enters the fray. Nat Rev Micro. 2013;11:513–524. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Corrigan RM, Bowman L, Willis AR, Kaever V, Gründling A. Cross-talk between Two Nucleotide-signaling Pathways in Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2015;290:5826–5839. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.598300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Corrigan RM, Campeotto I, Jeganathan T, Roelofs KG, Lee VT, Grundling A. Systematic identification of conserved bacterial c-di-AMP receptor proteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013;110:9084–9089. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1300595110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Davies BW, Bogard RW, Young TS, Mekalanos JJ. Coordinated Regulation of Accessory Genetic Elements Produces Cyclic Di-Nucleotides for V. cholerae Virulence. Cell. 2012;149:358–370. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dey B, Dey RJ, Cheung LS, Pokkali S, Guo H, Lee JH, Bishai WR. A bacterial cyclic dinucleotide activates the cytosolic surveillance pathway and mediates innate resistance to tuberculosis. Nat Med. 2015;21:401–406. doi: 10.1038/nm.3813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Durack J, Burke TP, Portnoy DA. A prl Mutation in SecY Suppresses Secretion and Virulence Defects of Listeria monocytogenes secA2 Mutants. J Bacteriol. 2015;197:932–942. doi: 10.1128/JB.02284-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Eylert E, Schär J, Mertins S, Stoll R, Bacher A, Goebel W, Eisenreich W. Carbon metabolism of Listeria monocytogenes growing inside macrophages. Molecular Microbiology. 2008;69:1008–1017. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06337.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Forchhammer K. PII signal transducers: novel functional and structural insights. Trends Microbiol. 2008;16:65–72. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2007.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Freitag NE, Port GC, Miner MD. Listeria monocytogenes — from saprophyte to intracellular pathogen. Nat Rev Micro. 2009;7:623–628. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Griffiths JM, O'Neill AJ. Loss of Function of the GdpP Protein Leads to Joint - Lactam/Glycopeptide Tolerance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;56:579–581. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05148-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gundlach J, Dickmanns A, Schröder-Tittmann K, Neumann P, Kaesler J, Kampf J, et al. Identification, Characterization, and Structure Analysis of the Cyclic di-AMP-binding P II-like Signal Transduction Protein DarA. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2015a;290:3069–3080. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.619619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gundlach J, Mehne FMP, Herzberg C, Kampf J, Valerius O, Kaever V, Stülke J. An Essential Poison: Synthesis and Degradation of Cyclic Di-AMP in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 2015b;197:3265–3274. doi: 10.1128/JB.00564-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Herzberg C, Weidinger LAF, Dörrbecker B, Hübner S, Stülke J, Commichau FM. SPINE: A method for the rapid detection and analysis of protein–protein interactions in vivo. Proteomics. 2007;7:4032–4035. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200700491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hodgson DA. Generalized transduction of serotype 1/2 and serotype 4b strains of Listeria monocytogenes. Molecular Microbiology. 2000;35:312–323. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01643.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Huynh TN, Woodward JJ. Too much of a good thing: regulated depletion of c-di-AMP in the bacterial cytoplasm. Current Opinion in Microbiology. 2016;30:22–29. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2015.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Huynh TN, Choi PH, Sureka K, Ledvina HE, Campillo J, Tong L, Woodward JJ. Cyclic di-AMP targets the cystathionine beta-synthase domain of the osmolyte transporter OpuC. Molecular Microbiology. 2016 doi: 10.1111/mmi.13456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Huynh TN, Luo S, Pensinger D, Sauer JD, Tong L, Woodward JJ. An HD-domain phosphodiesterase mediates cooperative hydrolysis of c-di-AMP to affect bacterial growth and virulence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2015;112:E747–E756. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1416485112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Jitrapakdee S, St Maurice M, Rayment I, Cleland WW, Wallace JC, Attwood PV. Structure, mechanism and regulation of pyruvate carboxylase. Biochem J. 2008;413:369–387. doi: 10.1042/BJ20080709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kalia D, Merey G, Nakayama S, Zheng Y, Zhou J, Luo Y, et al. Nucleotide, c-di-GMP, c-di-AMP, cGMP, cAMP, (p)ppGpp signaling in bacteria and implications in pathogenesis. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42:305–341. doi: 10.1039/c2cs35206k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kellenberger CA, Chen C, Whiteley AT, Portnoy DA, Hammond MC. RNA-Based Fluorescent Biosensors for Live Cell Imaging of Second Messenger Cyclic di-AMP. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137:6432–6435. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b00275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kim H, Youn SJ, Kim SO, Ko J, Lee JO, Choi BS. Structural Studies of Potassium Transport Protein KtrA Regulator of Conductance of K +(RCK) C Domain in Complex with Cyclic Diadenosine Monophosphate (c-di-AMP) Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2015;290:16393–16402. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.641340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kim HJ, Mittal M, Sonenshein AL. CcpC-Dependent Regulation of citB and lmo0847 in Listeria monocytogenes. J Bacteriol. 2005;188:179–190. doi: 10.1128/JB.188.1.179-190.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kline BC, McKay SL, Tang WW, Portnoy DA. The Listeria monocytogenes Hibernation-Promoting Factor Is Required for the Formation of 100S Ribosomes, Optimal Fitness, and Pathogenesis. J Bacteriol. 2015;197:581–591. doi: 10.1128/JB.02223-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Ko R, Smith LT. Identification of an ATP-driven, osmoregulated glycine betaine transport system in Listeria monocytogenes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65:4040–4048. doi: 10.1128/aem.65.9.4040-4048.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Lauer P, Chow MYN, Loessner MJ, Portnoy DA, Calendar R. Construction, Characterization, and Use of Two Listeria monocytogenes Site-Specific Phage Integration Vectors. J Bacteriol. 2002;184:4177–4186. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.15.4177-4186.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Liu S, Bayles DO, Mason TM, Wilkinson BJ. A Cold-Sensitive Listeria monocytogenes Mutant Has a Transposon Insertion in a Gene Encoding a Putative Membrane Protein and Shows Altered (p)ppGpp Levels. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:3955–3959. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02607-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Luo Y, Helmann JD. Analysis of the role of Bacillus subtilis σM in β-lactam resistance reveals an essential role for c-di-AMP in peptidoglycan homeostasis. Molecular Microbiology. 2012;83:623–639. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07953.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Maqbool A, Levdikov VM, Blagova EV, Herve M, Horler RSP, Wilkinson AJ, Thomas GH. Compensating Stereochemical Changes Allow Murein Tripeptide to Be Accommodated in a Conventional Peptide-binding Protein. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2011;286:31512–31521. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.267179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Maria-Rosario A, Davidson I, Debra M, Verheul A, Abee T, Booth IR. The role of peptide metabolism in the growth of Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 23074 at high osmolarity. Microbiology. 1995;141:41–49. doi: 10.1099/00221287-141-1-41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Mattevi A, Obmolova G, Schulze E, Kalk K, Westphal A, de Kok A, Hol W. Atomic structure of the cubic core of the pyruvate dehydrogenase multienzyme complex. Science. 1992;255:1544–1550. doi: 10.1126/science.1549782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Maurice MS, Reinhardt L, Surinya KH, Attwood PV, Wallace JC, Cleland WW, Rayment I. Domain Architecture of Pyruvate Carboxylase, a Biotin-Dependent Multifunctional Enzyme. Science. 2007;317:1076–1079. doi: 10.1126/science.1144504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. McKay SL, Portnoy DA. Ribosome Hibernation Facilitates Tolerance of Stationary-Phase Bacteria to Aminoglycosides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:6992–6999. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01532-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Mengin-Lecreulx D, van Heijenoort J. Characterization of the essential gene glmM encoding phosphoglucosamine mutase in Escherichia coli. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1996;271:32–39. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.1.32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Miller C, Kong J, Tran TT, Arias CA, Saxer G, Shamoo Y. Adaptation of Enterococcus faecalis to daptomycin reveals an ordered progression to resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:5373–5383. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01473-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Mitchell G, Ge L, Huang Q, Chen C, Kianian S, Roberts MF, et al. Avoidance of Autophagy Mediated by PlcA or ActA Is Required for Listeria monocytogenes Growth in Macrophages. Infect Immun. 2015;83:2175–2184. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00110-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Mittal M, Pechter KB, Picossi S, Kim HJ, Kerstein KO, Sonenshein AL. Dual role of CcpC protein in regulation of aconitase gene expression in Listeria monocytogenes and Bacillus subtilis. Microbiology. 2012;159:68–76. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.063388-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Modak HV, Kelly DJ. Acetyl-CoA-dependent pyruvate carboxylase from the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus: rapid and efficient purification using dye-ligand affinity chromatography. Microbiology. 1995;141:2619–2628. doi: 10.1099/13500872-141-10-2619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Moscoso JA, Schramke H, Zhang Y, Tosi T, Dehbi A, Jung K, Gründling A. Binding of Cyclic Di-AMP to the Staphylococcus aureus Sensor Kinase KdpD Occurs via the Universal Stress Protein Domain and Downregulates the Expression of the Kdp Potassium Transporter. J Bacteriol. 2015;198:98–110. doi: 10.1128/JB.00480-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Müller M, Hopfner KP, Witte G. c-di-AMP recognition by Staphylococcus aureus PstA. FEBS Letters. 2015;589:45–51. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.11.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Na Y, Yang S, Lee S. Evaluation of citrate-coated magnetic nanoparticles as draw solute for forward osmosis. Desalination. 2014;347:34–42. [Google Scholar]
  57. Nelson JW, Sudarsan N, Furukawa K, Weinberg Z, Wang JX, Breaker RR. Riboswitches in eubacteria sense the second messenger c-di-AMP. Nat Chem Biol. 2013;9:834–839. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Ninfa AJ, Jiang P. PII signal transduction proteins: sensors of α-ketoglutarate that regulate nitrogen metabolism. Current Opinion in Microbiology. 2005;8:168–173. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2005.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. O'Riordan M, Moors MA, Portnoy DA. Listeria Intracellular Growth and Virulence Require Host-Derived Lipoic Acid. Science. 2003;302:462–464. doi: 10.1126/science.1088170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Okada Y, Makino SI, Tobe T, Okada N, Yamazaki S. Cloning of rel from Listeria monocytogenes as an osmotolerance involvement gene. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68:1541–1547. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.4.1541-1547.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Pechter KB, Meyer FM, Serio AW, Stülke J, Sonenshein AL. Two roles for aconitase in the regulation of tricarboxylic acid branch gene expression in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 2013;195:1525–1537. doi: 10.1128/JB.01690-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Peng X, Zhang Y, Bai G, Zhou X, Wu H. Cyclic di-AMP mediates biofilm formation. Molecular Microbiology. 2015;99:945–959. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Perego M, Higgins CF, Pearce SR, Gallagher MP, Hoch JA. The oligopeptide transport system of Bacillus subtilis plays a role in the initiation of sporulation. Molecular Microbiology. 1991;5:173–185. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1991.tb01838.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Phan-Thanh L, Gormon T. A chemically defined minimal medium for the optimal culture of Listeria. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 1997;35:91–95. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(96)01205-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Premaratne RJ, Lin WJ, Johnson EA. Development of an improved chemically defined minimal medium for Listeria monocytogenes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991;57:3046–3048. doi: 10.1128/aem.57.10.3046-3048.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Quillin SJ, Schwartz KT, Leber JH. The novel Listeria monocytogenes bile sensor BrtA controls expression of the cholic acid efflux pump MdrT. Molecular Microbiology. 2011;81:129–142. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07683.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Rae CS, Geissler A, Adamson PC, Portnoy DA. Mutations of the Listeria monocytogenes Peptidoglycan N-Deacetylase and O-Acetylase Result in Enhanced Lysozyme Sensitivity, Bacteriolysis, and Hyperinduction of Innate Immune Pathways. Infect Immun. 2011;79:3596–3606. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00077-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Reniere ML, Whiteley AT, Portnoy DA. An In Vivo Selection Identifies Listeria monocytogenes Genes Required to Sense the Intracellular Environment and Activate Virulence Factor Expression. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12:e1005741. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Reniere ML, Whiteley AT, Hamilton KL, John SM, Lauer P, Brennan RG, Portnoy DA. Glutathione activates virulence gene expression of an intracellular pathogen. Nature. 2015;517:170–173. doi: 10.1038/nature14029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Rismondo J, Gibhardt J, Rosenberg J, Kaever V, Halbedel S, Commichau FM. Phenotypes Associated with the Essential Diadenylate Cyclase CdaA and Its Potential Regulator CdaR in the Human Pathogen Listeria monocytogenes. J Bacteriol. 2016;198:416–426. doi: 10.1128/JB.00845-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Robinson BH. Lactic acidemia and mitochondrial disease. Mol Genet Metab. 2006;89:3–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2006.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Romling U. Great Times for Small Molecules: c-di-AMP, a Second Messenger Candidate in Bacteria and Archaea. Sci Signal. 2008;1:pe39–pe39. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.133pe39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Rosenberg J, Dickmanns A, Neumann P, Gunka K, Arens J, Kaever V, et al. Structural and Biochemical Analysis of the Essential Diadenylate Cyclase CdaA from Listeria monocytogenes. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2015;290:6596–6606. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.630418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Schar J, Stoll R, Schauer K, Loeffler DIM, Eylert E, Joseph B, et al. Pyruvate Carboxylase Plays a Crucial Role in Carbon Metabolism of Extra- and Intracellularly Replicating Listeria monocytogenes. J Bacteriol. 2010;192:1774–1784. doi: 10.1128/JB.01132-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Schiller LR. Clinical pharmacology and use of laxatives and lavage solutions. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1999;28:11–18. doi: 10.1097/00004836-199901000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Meth. 2012;9:671–675. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Schuster CF, Bellows LE, Tosi T, Campeotto I, Corrigan RM, Freemont P, Grundling A. The second messenger c-di-AMP inhibits the osmolyte uptake system OpuC in Staphylococcus aureus. Sci Signal. 2016;9:ra81–ra81. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aaf7279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Simon R, Priefer U, Puhler A. A Broad Host Range Mobilization System for In Vivo Genetic Engineering: Transposon Mutagenesis in Gram Negative Bacteria. Nat Biotechnol. 1983;1:784–791. [Google Scholar]
  79. Sleator RD, Gahan CGM, Hill C. A Postgenomic Appraisal of Osmotolerance in Listeria monocytogenes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:1–9. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.1.1-9.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Smith K, Youngman P. Use of a new integrational vector to investigate compartment-specific expression of the Bacillus subtilis spollM gene. Biochimie. 1992;74:705–711. doi: 10.1016/0300-9084(92)90143-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Smith WM, Pham TH, Lei L, Dou J, Soomro AH, Beatson SA, et al. Heat resistance and salt hypersensitivity in Lactococcus lactis due to spontaneous mutation of llmg_1816 (gdpP) induced by high-temperature growth. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:7753–7759. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02316-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Sonenshein AL. Control of key metabolic intersections in Bacillus subtilis. Nat Rev Micro. 2007;5:917–927. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Sonenshein AL, Somerville GA, Richardson AR. Regulating the Intersection of Metabolism and Pathogenesis in Gram-positive Bacteria. In: Conway T, Cohen PS, editors. Metabolism and Bacterial Pathogenesis. 2015. pp. 129–165. American Society of Microbiology. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Sureka K, Choi PH, Precit M, Delince M, Pensinger DA, Huynh TN, et al. The Cyclic Dinucleotide c-di-AMP Is an Allosteric Regulator of Metabolic Enzyme Function. Cell. 2014;158:1389–1401. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Tilney LG, Portnoy DA. Actin filaments and the growth, movement, and spread of the intracellular bacterial parasite, Listeria monocytogenes. J Cell Biol. 1989;109:1597–1608. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.4.1597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Tsai HN, Hodgson DA. Development of a Synthetic Minimal Medium for Listeria monocytogenes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:6943–6945. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.11.6943-6945.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Vasantha N, Freese E. Enzyme changes during Bacillus subtilis sporulation caused by deprivation of guanine nucleotides. J Bacteriol. 1980;144:1119–1125. doi: 10.1128/jb.144.3.1119-1125.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Welshimer HJ. Vitamin Requirements of Listeria Monocytogenes. J Bacteriol. 1963;85:1156–1159. doi: 10.1128/jb.85.5.1156-1159.1963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Wexler ID, Kerr DS, Du Y, Kaung MM, Stephenson W, Lusk MM, et al. Molecular characterization of pyruvate carboxylase deficiency in two consanguineous families. Pediatr Res. 1998;43:579–584. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199805000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Whiteley AT, Pollock AJ, Portnoy DA. The PAMP c-di-AMP Is Essential for Listeria monocytogenes Growth in Rich but Not Minimal Media due to a Toxic Increase in (p)ppGpp. Cell Host & Microbe. 2015;17:788–798. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.05.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Witte CE, Whiteley AT, Burke TP, Sauer JD, Portnoy DA, Woodward JJ. Cyclic di-AMP is critical for Listeria monocytogenes growth, cell wall homeostasis, and establishment of infection. mBio. 2013;4:e00282–13. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00282-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Witte G, Hartung S, Büttner K, Hopfner KP. Structural Biochemistry of a Bacterial Checkpoint Protein Reveals Diadenylate Cyclase Activity Regulated by DNA Recombination Intermediates. Molecular Cell. 2008;30:167–178. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.02.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Wood JM. Osmosensing by bacteria: signals and membrane-based sensors. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1999;63:230–262. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.63.1.230-262.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Wood JM. Bacterial Osmoregulation: A Paradigm for the Study of Cellular Homeostasis. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2011;65:215–238. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-090110-102815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Wood JM. Bacterial responses to osmotic challenges. J Gen Physiol. 2015;145:381–388. doi: 10.1085/jgp.201411296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Woodward JJ, Iavarone AT, Portnoy DA. c-di-AMP Secreted by Intracellular Listeria monocytogenes Activates a Host Type I Interferon Response. Science. 2010;328:1703–1705. doi: 10.1126/science.1189801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Wurtzel O, Sesto N, Mellin JR, Karunker I, Edelheit S, Bécavin C, et al. Comparative transcriptomics of pathogenic and non-pathogenic Listeria species. Mol Syst Biol. 2012;8 doi: 10.1038/msb.2012.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Xiang S, Tong L. Crystal structures of human and Staphylococcus aureus pyruvate carboxylase and molecular insights into the carboxyltransfer reaction. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2008;15:295–302. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Yan X, Zhao C, Budin-Verneuil A, Hartke A, Rince A, Gilmore MS, et al. The (p)ppGpp synthetase RelA contributes to stress adaptation and virulence in Enterococcus faecalis V583. Microbiology. 2009;155:3226–3237. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.026146-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Yang J, Bai Y, Zhang Y, Gabrielle VD, Jin L, Bai G. Deletion of the cyclic di-AMP phosphodiesterase gene (cnpB) in Mycobacterium tuberculosisleads to reduced virulence in a mouse model of infection. Molecular Microbiology. 2014;93:65–79. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Yu LPC, Xiang S, Lasso G, Gil D, Valle M, Tong L. A Symmetrical Tetramer for S. aureus Pyruvate Carboxylase in Complex with Coenzyme A. Structure. 2009;17:823–832. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2009.04.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Zemansky J, Kline BC, Woodward JJ, Leber JH, Marquis H, Portnoy DA. Development of a mariner-Based Transposon and Identification of Listeria monocytogenes Determinants, Including the Peptidyl-Prolyl Isomerase PrsA2, That Contribute to Its Hemolytic Phenotype. J Bacteriol. 2009;191:3950–3964. doi: 10.1128/JB.00016-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Zhu Y, Pham TH, Nhiep THN, Vu NMT, Marcellin E, Chakrabortti A, et al. Cyclic-di-AMP synthesis by the diadenylate cyclase CdaA is modulated by the peptidoglycan biosynthesis enzyme GlmM in Lactococcus lactis. Molecular Microbiology. 2015;99:1015–1027. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supp DataS1

Figure S1. Complementation of suppressor mutations Enumeration of CFU on indicated media for L. monocytogenes strains constructed in LSM. Data are mean ± s.e.m of at least three independent experiments and the p value was calculated using a heteroscedastic Student's t-test; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.001, ns p > 0.05.

Figure S2. Opp activity and growth ΔdacA suppressor mutants in media containing oligopeptides Bialaphos, a tripeptide antibiotic, disk diffusion on LSM-agar. (B) Enumeration of CFU on indicated media for L. monocytogenes strains constructed in LSM. All data are mean ± s.e.m of at least three independent experiments.

RESOURCES