The numbers on page EL163 are incorrect as a result of an author error. The correct version is “Both musicians and non-musicians seemed to utilize both F0 and VTL cues similarly, as confirmed by the cue weighting analysis (musicians: F0 3.74, VTL 6.95; non-musicians: F0 3.72, VTL 5.56)” and “This is shown by the flatter performance lines and by the lower cue weighting (musicians: F0 2.05, VTL 0.35; non-musicians: F0 1.76, VTL 0.64).”
TABLE I.
The corrected Table I.
| Factors | F-ratio, p-value |
|---|---|
| Musical experience (musician, non-musician) | F (1,1) = 5.81, p = 0.020* |
| F0 | F (2.22,106.73) = 161.94, p < 0.001 ** |
| VTL | F (3.27,156.98) = 220.69, p < 0.001 ** |
| Listening condition (unprocessed, CI simulation) | F (1,1) = 49.44, p < 0.001 ** |
| F0 × Musical experience | F (2.22,106.73) = 0.098, p = 0.98 |
| VTL × Musical experience | F (3.27,156.98) = 1.16, p = 0.33 |
| Listening condition × Musical experience | F (1,1) = 0.13, p = 0.72 |
| F0 × VTL | F (13.33,639.64) = 6.47, p < 0.001** |
| F0 × VTL × musical experience | F (13.33,639.64) = 1.72, p = 0.051 |
| Listening condition × F0 | F (1.80,86.32) = 0.82, p = 0.43 |
| Listening condition × VTL | F (2.71,129.91) = 125.55, p < 0.001** |
| Listening condition × VTL × musical experience | F (2.71,129.91) = 1.05, p = 0.37 |
| Listening condition × F0 × musical experience | F (1.80,86.32) = 1.17, p = 0.311 |
| Listening condition × F0 × VTL | F (13.14,630.76) = 7.43, p < 0.001** |
| Listening condition × F0 × VTL × musical experience | F (13.14,630.76) = 1.07. p = 0.38 |