Skip to main content
Endocrinology logoLink to Endocrinology
. 2009 Apr;150(4):1879–1885. doi: 10.1210/en.2008-1021

Impaired Steroidogenesis and Implantation Failure in Bmal1−/− Mice

Christine K Ratajczak 1, Katie L Boehle 1, Louis J Muglia 1
PMCID: PMC5393263  PMID: 19056819

Abstract

Evidence in humans and rodents suggests that normal circadian rhythmicity is important for supporting reproductive function. A molecular clock underlies circadian rhythmicity. Impaired fertility is observed in some genetically altered mice with deficiencies in genes of the molecular clock, suggesting a critical role for these genes in reproduction. Here we systematically characterize the reproductive phenotype of females deficient in the clock gene Bmal1. Bmal1−/− females are infertile. They exhibit progression through the estrous cycle, although these cycles are prolonged. Normal follicular development occurs in Bmal1−/− females, and healthy embryos of the expected developmental stage are found in the reproductive tract of Bmal1−/− females 3.5 d after mating to wild-type males. However, serum progesterone levels are significantly lower in Bmal1−/− vs. Bmal1+/± females on d 3.5 of gestation. Low progesterone levels in Bmal1−/− females are accompanied by decreased expression of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein in corpora lutea of Bmal1−/− vs. Bmal1+/± females. Whereas implantation of embryos is not observed in untreated or vehicle-treated Bmal1−/− females, exogenous administration of progesterone to Bmal1−/− females is able to reinstitute implantation. These data suggest that implantation failure due to impaired steroidogenesis causes infertility of Bmal1−/− females.


Although ovulation occurs in Bmal1-/- female mice, they experience implantation failure due to impaired steroidogenesis with accompanying low levels of StAR expression.


Infertility affects 8% of females aged 19–26 yr and 18% of females aged 35–39 yr (1). Given these statistics, a greater understanding of normal fertility and causes of infertility is warranted. Disruption of circadian rhythmicity may lead to reproductive difficulties in women. Altered menstrual function (2), subfertility (3), and increased incidence of miscarriage (4) have been reported in female shift workers. Circadian rhythmicity is driven by a group of core clock genes, including Clock, Bmal1, Per1/2, and Cry1/2 (5). These genes are expressed in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the hypothalamus, which is considered the master clock of the organism as well as in many peripheral tissues. Expression of clock genes has been noted in the uterus (6), oviduct (7), ovary (8), and GnRH neurons (9), indicating a potential role for these genes in supporting normal reproduction.

Although it is difficult to determine whether the reproductive difficulties noted in female shift workers are related to stressful lifestyle or specifically a disruption of circadian rhythmicity, there is evidence from rodent studies to suggest that disruption of circadian rhythmicity can lead to aberrant reproductive phenotypes. In female rats, ablation of the suprachiasmatic nucleus leads to irregular estrous cyclicity (10) and an inhibition of the LH surge (11) and ovulation (12). In addition, the phenotypes of genetically altered mice with clock gene deficiencies indicate a role for these rhythm generating genes in supporting normal female reproductive phenotype. The most thoroughly characterized clock gene-deficient mouse is the ClockΔ19 mutant. Decreased fertility of ClockΔ19 mutant females is noted by several groups (9, 13, 14) but refuted in one known report (6). ClockΔ19 mutant females reportedly experience irregular estrous cycles (6, 9, 15) and no coordinated LH surge on the day of proestrus (15). In addition, these females have low progesterone levels at midgestation and a high incidence of midgestational fetal resorptions and extended but nonproductive labor (15).

The ClockΔ19 mutants studied for reproductive phenotype have a deletion in Clock’s transcriptional activation domain, which results in dominant-negative, antimorphic activity (16, 17, 18). These ClockΔ19 mutants have a breakdown of wheel-running rhythmicity in constant darkness (19). However, in light-dark cycles, ClockΔ19 mutants are reported to exhibit nearly normal wheel running, with running concentrated in the dark period (19, 20). In addition, ClockΔ19 mutants selectively bred for a capacity to synthesize melatonin produce the hormone rhythmically in both light-dark and dark-dark cycles (20, 21). This suggests that central rhythmicity is maintained in these mutants and may facilitate their estrous cycle progression and ovulation.

The more recently generated Clock−/− mice maintain circadian rhythmicity in constant darkness (22). This indicates that despite the previously held view in the circadian field, Clock is not required for the generation of circadian rhythmicity (22). Bmal1−/− mice have a much more robust circadian phenotype than Clock−/− mice. In light-dark cycles, Bmal1−/− mice spend more time running in the light phase than do Bmal1+/± mice and are less likely to begin running within 0.5 h of lights off than Bmal1+/± mice (23). Bmal1−/− mice also experience a complete loss of circadian rhythmicity in constant darkness (24). Therefore, Bmal1−/− mice may be valuable in examining roles for genes of the molecular clock in addition to generation of circadian rhythmicity. Through use of Bmal1−/− mice, effects of Bmal1 on processes seemingly unrelated to circadian rhythmicity such as hair growth (25) and ossification of ligaments and tendons (23) have been demonstrated. Infertility of both male and female Bmal1−/− mice has been reported (26). Bmal1−/− males have been demonstrated to be deficient in the production of testosterone, suggesting a role for Bmal1 in normal steroidogenesis (26). It has been suggested that Bmal1−/− females have delayed puberty, irregular estrous cycles, and smaller ovaries and uteri but are able to ovulate (27, 28). However, there has been no thorough examination of the reproductive phenotype of these females.

In the present report, we characterize reproductive function in female Bmal1−/− mice. We find these mice to be infertile, with normal ovulation, but a defect in steroidogenesis that results in implantation failure. Our data indicate that Bmal1−/− females are unable to generate the high levels of progesterone necessary for successfully maintaining gestation.

Materials and Methods

Animals

Bmal1−/− outbred mice were provided by C. Bradfield (University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI) and maintained by heterozygote F1 × F1 crosses (24). Genotyping was performed by PCR as described (24). Wild-type and heterozygous littermates were used as controls unless otherwise noted. Continuous matings of Bmal1+/+ females and Bmal1+/− females were analyzed. Average litter size of mated Bmal1+/+ females was 7.33 ± 0.33 pups, whereas average litter size of mated Bmal1+/− females was 8.0 ± 1.0 (P = 0.4770; n = 6, Bmal1+/+ litters; n = 4, Bmal1+/− litters). Time between litters was 34.20 ± 6.34 d for continuously mated Bmal1+/+ females and 39.25 ± 4.64 d for continuously mated Bmal1+/− females (P = 0.5607; n = 8, Bmal1+/+ litters; n = 7, Bmal1+/− litters). These interpregnancy intervals and litter sizes are similar to those reported by other investigators for control animals (29). Animals were maintained on a 12-h light, 12-h dark cycle. Females were checked for presence of a copulatory plug the morning after mating. Morning of the plug [1000 h, Zeitgeber time (ZT) 4] was noted as d 0.5 of gestation. All animal experimentation described was conducted in accordance with accepted standards of humane animal care and was approved by the Washington University Animal Studies Committee.

Estrus

Estrous cycle stage was determined in females aged 2–6 months by histological analysis of vaginal smears for 22 consecutive days. Vaginal smears were taken daily, and cell morphology was analyzed to determine cycle stage (30). Cycle length was defined as time between onsets of estrus. Statistical analysis was by t test for cycle length and two-way ANOVA for proportion of time in each estrous stage.

Histological analysis

Ovaries were collected from virgin females 14 wk of age. Implantation sites were collected from gravid d 10.5 females (ZT 4). Tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight, processed, and embedded in paraffin using standard protocols. Six- to 8-μm sections were cut. For ovaries, every 10th section was kept. For implantation sites, every fifth section was kept. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and examined with a light microscope.

Follicle development

Ovarian follicle classification was based on the scheme of Pedersen and Peters (31). As previously described, follicles were counted on five of the largest hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections from each ovary and standardized to total area of the section (32). Counts and area were determined using AxioVision software (Carl Zeiss Micro Imaging, Inc. Thornwood, NY). Statistical analysis was by two-way ANOVA.

Oocyte and embryo recovery

Females were mated to wild-type males. At ZT 4 on d 3.5 of gestation, females were killed by cervical dislocation and oocytes and embryos were harvested (33). Briefly, the reproductive tract was dissected out and oocytes and embryos were flushed out of the fallopian tubes and uterus with PBS. Morphology of oocytes and embryos recovered was examined under a microscope. The examiner was blinded to genotype of the mouse. Statistical analysis was by t test for number of oocytes and embryos recovered.

Hormone measurements

Mice were anesthetized with 2.5% Avertin and blood was collected by retroorbital sinus sampling using heparinized capillary tubes. Serum was separated by centrifugation and stored at −80 C until assayed. Estradiol and progesterone levels were assayed using solid-phase 125I-RIAs according to manufacturer’s protocol (Diagnostic Products Corp., Los Angeles, CA). Statistical analysis was by t test for comparisons at a single time point and two-way ANOVA for comparisons at multiple time points.

In situ hybridization

In situ hybridization was performed as previously described (34). Briefly, ovaries were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight, followed by 3 d in 10% sucrose for cryopreservation. Ovaries were then embedded in OCT (Sakuva Finetek USA, Torrance, CA), and 14-μm sections were cut on a cryostat. Bmal1 and steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) riboprobes were generated from GenBank NM_007489 nucleotides 2324-2637 and GenBank NM_011485 nucleotides 541-703, respectively. Sense and antisense [α-33P]-labeled cRNA probes were generated from these templates using appropriate polymerases and hybridized to slides. After washing, slides were exposed to autoradiographic film and scanned at high resolution. Densitometric analysis was performed using National Institutes of Health Image software (Bethesda, MD). Statistical analysis was by two-way ANOVA. To assess ovarian histology, hybridized slides were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and examined with a light microscope.

Hormone supplementation

Females were mated to wild-type males. Starting on d 3.5 of gestation, females were injected sc with 2 mg progesterone (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) in sesame oil daily or 200 μl of sesame oil as a vehicle control at ZT 4 as described (35). Serum progesterone levels in hormone supplemented mice were confirmed to be at or above levels observed in wild-type gravid mice by RIA (data not shown). At ZT 4 on d 10.5, females were killed by cervical dislocation and their uteri examined for the presence of implantation sites. Diameter of whole implantation sites was measured under a light microscope. Frequency of implantation was analyzed by Marascuillo procedure. Diameter length and number of implantation sites were analyzed by one-way ANOVA.

Results

Bmal1−/− females are infertile with prolonged estrous cycles

To establish that Bmal1−/− females are infertile, we mated Bmal1−/− females to Bmal1+/+ males. No litters ever resulted from these matings, although plugs were detected a total of 11 times among five mated Bmal1−/− females. This is in agreement with previous reports indicating that Bmal1−/− females are infertile (26). To establish whether these females progress through the estrous cycle, stage of estrus of sexually mature females was tracked for 22 consecutive days by histological analysis of vaginal smears. Five of five analyzed Bmal1+/+ mice and five of six Bmal1−/− females were found to be cycling. Although the majority of Bmal1−/− females were found to be cycling, the length of the cycle was 49% longer in Bmal1−/− females compared with Bmal1+/+ females (P < 0.0001, n = 5 for each genotype) (Fig. 1, A–C). However, there was no difference in the proportion of time spent in any estrous cycle stage between Bmal1−/− and Bmal1+/+ females (Fig. 1D).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Prolonged estrous cycles in Bmal1−/− females. Estrous cycle was assessed by histological analysis of vaginal smears. Progression through the stages of the estrous cycle in representative Bmal1+/+ (A) and Bmal1−/− (B) females is shown. Mean cycle length (C) and proportion of time spent in each estrous stage (D) (n = 5 for each group) is also shown. Values are means ± sem. *, P < 0.001.

Histological analysis of ovaries from 14-wk-old females

Ovaries from 14-wk-old females were examined to determine whether normal follicular development occurs in the infertile Bmal1−/− females. In the ovaries of both Bmal1+/± and Bmal1−/− females, normal, healthy follicles in all stages of development and corpora lutea were observed (Fig. 2A). There were no differences in the abundance of follicles in any stage of development in Bmal1−/− vs. Bmal1+/± ovaries (n = 4, Bmal1+/±; n = 3, Bmal1−/−) (Fig. 2B).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Normal follicular development in Bmal1−/− females. Follicles were counted on sections of hematoxylin and eosin-stained ovary. A, Normal preantral follicles (indicated by arrows), antral follicles (indicated by arrows), and corpora lutea in Bmal1+/± and Bmal1−/− ovaries. Black bars, 50 μm. B, Abundance of follicles in different stages of development. Values are means ± sem (n = 4, Bmal1+/±; n = 3, Bmal1−/−). PF, Primordial and primary follicles; PrF, preantral follicles; APrF, atretic preantral follicles; AnF, antral follicles; AAnF, atretic antral follicles; CL, corpora lutea.

Normal preimplantation embryos present in Bmal1−/− females

To determine whether Bmal1−/− females ovulate, and, if so, whether oocytes of Bmal1−/− females can be fertilized and undergo normal preimplantation development, oocytes and embryos were flushed from the reproductive tract of Bmal1+/± and Bmal1−/− females successfully mated to Bmal1+/+ males at ZT 4 on d 3.5 of gestation and examined. Oocytes or embryos were present in the reproductive tract of 12 of 15 Bmal1+/± females and 11 of 15 Bmal1−/− females analyzed. Slightly fewer oocytes or embryos were isolated from each of the Bmal1−/− females than from Bmal1+/± females examined, but this was not statistically significant (P = 0.062; n = 12, Bmal1+/±; n = 11, Bmal1−/−) (Fig. 3A). In the case of both Bmal1−/− and Bmal1+/± females, the majority of embryos isolated were fertilized and healthy (Fig. 3B). Furthermore, in each group, the embryos isolated were predominantly in the morula or blastocyst stage as would be expected at this time of gestation (Fig. 3C).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Healthy preimplantation embryos but low serum progesterone levels in Bmal1−/− females at d 3.5 of gestation. Oocytes and embryos were flushed from the reproductive tract at d 3.5 of gestation and analyzed under a light microscope. Serum progesterone and estradiol at d 3.5 of gestation were assayed by solid-phase 125I-RIA. A, Average number of oocytes/embryos isolated from each gravid female. Values are means ± sem. Numbers in bars indicate the number of females with oocytes or embryos/total number of females analyzed. B, Percentage of embryos isolated identified as healthy, unfertilized, and degenerating. C, Percentage of healthy embryos isolated in the blastocyst or morula stage. D, Serum progesterone at ZT 4 on d 3.5 (n = 14, Bmal1+/±; n = 15, Bmal1−/−). Values are means ± sem. *, P < 0.0001. E, Circadian serum progesterone throughout d 3.5 (n = 3, Bmal1+/±; n = 3–4, Bmal1−/− per time point). Values are means ± sem (P < 0.0001 with respect to genotype). F, Serum estradiol (n = 12, Bmal1+/±; n = 15, Bmal1−/−). Values are means ± sem.

Decreased serum progesterone but not estradiol in d 3.5 Bmal1−/− females

Appropriate regulation of progesterone and estradiol levels is important for the process of implantation on d 3.5 of gestation in mice (36). Progesterone levels are increased at the time of implantation and remain elevated throughout gestation, whereas a spike in estrogen levels occurs on the day of implantation. To determine whether the normal hormonal milieu is present in Bmal1−/− females to support implantation, serum progesterone and estradiol levels were assayed at ZT 4 on d 3.5 of gestation. Serum progesterone levels were approximately 6.5-fold higher in Bmal1+/± females than Bmal1−/− females at ZT 4 (P < 0.0001; n = 14, Bmal1+/±; n = 15, Bmal1−/−) (Fig. 3D). Progesterone levels in Bmal1+/± and Bmal1−/− females were assessed over the circadian day to determine whether up-regulation of progesterone is merely delayed in the Bmal1−/−females. Serum was collected from animals killed at 6-h intervals beginning 6 h before the d 3.5 ZT 4 time point at ZT 22 on d 3 of gestation. Progesterone levels were not affected by time of day. Higher progesterone levels in Bmal1+/± females vs. Bmal1−/− females persisted at all time points (P < 0.0001; n = 3–4 Bmal1+/± or Bmal1−/− females per time point) (Fig. 3E). There was no difference in serum estradiol levels of Bmal1+/± and Bmal1−/− females at ZT 4 on d 3.5 of gestation (n = 12, Bmal1+/±; n = 15, Bmal1−/−) (Fig. 3F).

StAR expression is decreased in d 3.5 corpora lutea of Bmal1−/− females

In mice, the corpus luteum is responsible for production of steroid hormones throughout gestation. Because serum progesterone levels are significantly lower in d 3.5 Bmal1−/− females compared with Bmal1+/± females, Bmal1−/− females were analyzed for potential luteal defects. Bmal1 mRNA expression was detected in the corpora lutea of ovaries from Bmal1+/+ females at ZT 4 on d 3.5 (Fig. 4, A and B). Because Bmal1 transcript expression does not change in rat corpora lutea over the circadian day (8), expression was not analyzed over the course of 24 h. Expression of StAR, the enzyme responsible for catalyzing the rate-limiting step of steroidogenesis, was assessed in d 3.5 corpora lutea of Bmal1−/− and Bmal1+/± females. StAR mRNA was robustly expressed in the corpora lutea of Bmal1+/± females but nearly undetectable in the corpora lutea of Bmal1−/− females (Fig. 4, C–F). StAR expression was significantly higher in corpora lutea of Bmal1+/± vs. Bmal1−/− females throughout d 3.5 at all time points analyzed (P < 0.0001, n = 3–7 Bmal1+/± or Bmal1−/− females per time point) (Fig. 4G). There were no differences in StAR expression in Bmal1+/± or Bmal1−/− females with respect to time of day. Bmal1 and StAR sense in situ are shown in supplemental Fig. 1, published as supplemental data on The Endocrine Society’s Journals Online web site at http:// endo.endojournals.org.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Bmal1 and StAR are expressed in corpora lutea of d 3.5 Bmal1+/± females. Ovary sections were subjected to in situ hybridization with radiolabeled antisense Bmal1 or StAR probes and then hematoxylin and eosin stained for histological analysis. A, Autoradiograph from in situ hybridization for Bmal1 at ZT 4 d 3.5. B, Hematoxylin and eosin staining of the same section. Arrows point to corpora lutea. Black bar, 200 μm. C and E, Representative autoradiographs from in situ hybridization for StAR at ZT 4 d 3.5. D and F, Hematoxylin and eosin staining of the same sections. Arrows point to corpora lutea. Black bars, 200 μm (n = 3, Bmal1+/±; n = 3, Bmal1−/−). G, Circadian StAR expression throughout d 3.5. Values are means ± sem (n = 3, Bmal1+/±; n = 3–7, Bmal1−/− per time point). +, No corpora lutea observed in any mice examined at this time point (P < 0.0001 with respect to genotype).

Progesterone administration restores implantation in Bmal1−/− females

In mice, d 3.5 is the start of the period of uterine receptivity to implantation (36). At this time, serum progesterone levels were found to be significantly lower in Bmal1−/− females compared with Bmal1+/± females (Fig. 3, D and E). Therefore, implantation was evaluated. At d 10.5 of gestation, implantation sites were present in uteri of 75% (six of eight) of untreated Bmal1+/± females, 50% (six of 12) of Bmal1+/± females receiving daily injections of vehicle starting at d 3.5, and 83% (five of six) of Bmal1+/± females receiving daily injections of progesterone starting at d 3.5 (Table 1). Implantation sites were never found in untreated Bmal1−/− females (none of six) or vehicle-treated Bmal1−/− females (none of six) on d 10.5 of gestation (P < 0.05 compared with untreated Bmal1+/± females). However, when Bmal1−/− females received daily injections of progesterone starting at d 3.5, 38% (five of 13) displayed implantation sites at d 10.5. Significantly fewer implantation sites were observed in individual gravid Bmal1−/− progesterone-treated females vs. untreated Bmal1+/± females (P < 0.05, n = 6 Bmal1+/± females, n = 5 Bmal1−/− females). Whereas implantation sites in progesterone-treated Bmal1−/− females had a smaller diameter than those in each Bmal1+/± female group (P < 0.001, n = 3 implantation sites from each of three to four females per group) (Fig 5E), they were histologically normal (Fig. 5, A–D).

TABLE 1.

Implantations in d 10.5 females

Maternal genotype d 10.5 IS, % Average no. of IS
Bmal1+/± (untreated) 75% (6/8) 7.5
Bmal1+/±+vehicle 50% (6/12) 8.5
Bmal1+/±+P4 83% (5/6) 8
Bmal1−/− (untreated) 0% (0/6)1 N/A
Bmal1−/−+vehicle 0% (0/6)1 N/A
Bmal1−/−+P4 38% (5/13) 5.62

Females were mated to wild-type males. Vehicle and P4-treated females were injected sc daily starting at d 3.5 of gestation. IS, Implantation site; P4, progesterone.

1

P < 0.05 compared with percent with IS for Bmal+/± (untreated).

2

P < 0.05 compared with average number of IS for Bmal1+/± (untreated). P4 dose was 2 mg/d.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Implantation sites found in progesterone-supplemented Bmal1−/− females are small but histologically normal. Paraffin sections of implantation sites were hematoxylin and eosin stained. Diameter of whole implantation sites was measured under a light microscope. Representative implantation sites from untreated Bmal1+/± females (A), vehicle-treated Bmal1+/± females (B), progesterone-treated Bmal1+/± females (C), and progesterone-treated Bmal1−/− females (D) are shown. Black bar, 1 mm. Em, Embryo; Pl, placenta; FM, fetal membranes; Ut, uterus. E, Implantation site diameter (n = 3 implantation sites from each of three to four females per group). *, P < 0.001 compared with each of the other groups. P4, Progesterone.

Discussion

Although Bmal1−/− females have previously been noted to be infertile (26), this report marks the first systematic characterization of their reproductive phenotype. Because clock genes have a described role in regulating GnRH pulsatility (9) and circadian regulation of the LH surge has been demonstrated (37), impaired ovulation seemed a likely cause of this infertility. However, failed ovulation is not observed in these females. Intact ovulation is suggested by the presence of corpora lutea in virgin Bmal1−/− females (Fig. 2) and confirmed by the presence of oocytes and embryos in the reproductive tract of Bmal1−/− females at d 3.5 of gestation (Fig. 3A). Whereas ovulation occurs in the Bmal1−/− females, steroid hormone deficiency appears to hinder later stages of reproduction. Under normal conditions, progesterone levels are robustly increased at d 3.5, the time of implantation and remain high throughout gestation. Progesterone-responsive genes such as Hoxa10 and Hoxa11 (38) have roles in uterine receptivity, implantation, and decidualization (36). After implantation, high levels of progesterone are responsible for maintaining uterine quiescence. Progesterone deficiency is observed in Bmal1−/− dams at the time of implantation (Fig. 3, D and E), and this deficiency persists at midgestation (data not shown). Regulation of estradiol levels is also important for coordinating implantation. However, there is no difference in estradiol levels in Bmal1−/− females compared with Bmal1+/± females (Fig. 3F). Similarly, a significant decrease in levels of progesterone but not estradiol has been reported for StAR−/− females (39). During gestation, estradiol is present at considerably lower levels than progesterone. Therefore, a defect in steroidogenesis may have a greater effect on progesterone levels than estradiol levels.

In mice, the corpora lutea are responsible for steroid hormone production throughout gestation. Interestingly, corpora lutea of pregnancy were observed significantly less frequently in d 3.5 Bmal1+/± females (12 of 12) vs. d 3.5 Bmal1−/− females (six of 16) (P < 0.0005), indicating a luteinization defect in the Bmal1−/− females. Expression of Bmal1 mRNA in the corpora lutea of d 3.5 Bmal1+/+ females (Fig. 4, A and B) indicates a potential role for Bmal1 in this organ. On d 3.5, the corpora lutea of Bmal1−/− females fail to express StAR, an enzyme required for steroidogenesis to the levels observed in Bmal1+/± females (Fig. 4, C–G). A similar defect exists in the Bmal1−/− male. Alvarez et al. (26) reported that Bmal1−/− males have decreased levels of testosterone and a corresponding decreased expression of StAR mRNA in the testis. This group also demonstrated the ability of BMAL1 to increase StAR expression in the MA-10 Leydig cell line (26). The CLOCK/BMAL1 heterodimer has also been shown to increase StAR expression in cultured chicken granulosa cells (40). Because Bmal1 mRNA is expressed in d 3.5 corpora lutea of Bmal1+/+ females, BMAL1 may be a direct regulator of StAR expression in the corpora lutea of Bmal1+/± females. Interestingly, because levels of serum progesterone and StAR expression do not change with respect to time of day, the observed steroidogenesis defect appears to result from a clock-independent role of Bmal1.

Implantation was never observed in either untreated or vehicle-treated mated Bmal1−/− females. However, progesterone supplementation starting on d 3.5 was able to reinstitute implantation in these females (Table 1). The observation of histologically normal implantation sites in these progesterone supplemented Bmal1−/− females (Fig. 5D) indicates that insufficient progesterone is a major factor in the observed implantation defect.

In addition to indicating that impaired steroidogenesis accounts for implantation failure in Bmal1−/− mice, this study reveals the existence of multiple reproductive defects in Bmal1−/− females. Bmal1−/− females had a lower number of oocytes and embryos present in the reproductive tract at d 3.5 (Fig. 3A) and a lower number of implantation sites present in the uterus at d 10.5 after progesterone treatment (Table 1) than Bmal1+/± females, suggesting potential irregularity of the hormonal milieu necessary for precipitating ovulation. In addition, the smaller size of the implantation sites in progesterone supplemented Bmal1−/− females suggests that Bmal1−/− females may have uterine abnormalities preventing normal maintenance of gestation. Further exploration of the many roles of Bmal1 in female reproduction is warranted. The data presented here indicate an important role for Bmal1 in steroidogenesis in the gonad and suggest that Bmal1 may have a similar function in other heretofore unanalyzed steroidogenic tissues.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Christopher Bradfield (University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI) for providing Bmal1−/− mice; Sherri Vogt, Crystal Kelley, Ann Ratchford, and Joan Riley for technical assistance; and Joan Riley for manuscript review.

Footnotes

Disclosure Summary: C.K.R. and K.L.B. have nothing to declare. L.J.M. serves on the Burroughs Wellcome Fund Scientific Advisory Board and receives grant support from Pfizer on work unrelated to these studies.

First Published Online December 4, 2008

Abbreviations: StAR, Steroidogenic acute regulatory protein; ZT, Zeitgeber time.

References

  • 1.Dunson DB, Baird DD, Colombo B 2004. Increased infertility with age in men and women. Obstet Gynecol 103:51–56 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Labyak S, Lava S, Turek F, Zee P 2002. Effects of shiftwork on sleep and menstrual function in nurses. Health Care Women Int 23:703–714 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bisanti L, Olsen J, Basso O, Thonneau P, Karmaus W 1996. Shift work and subfecundity: a European multicenter study. European Study Group on Infertility and Subfecundity. J Occup Environ Med 38:352–358 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Knutsson A 2003. Health disorders of shift workers. Occup Med (Lond) 53:103–108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Reppert SM, Weaver DR 2002. Coordination of circadian timing in mammals. Nature 418:935–941 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dolatshad H, Campbell EA, O'Hara L, Maywood ES, Hastings MH, Johnson MH 2006. Developmental and reproductive performance in circadian mutant mice. Hum Reprod 21:68–79 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kennaway DJ, Varcoe TJ, Mau VJ 2003. Rhythmic expression of clock and clock-controlled genes in the rat oviduct. Mol Hum Reprod 9:503–507 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Karman BN, Tischkau SA 2006. Circadian clock gene expression in the ovary: effects of luteinizing hormone. Biol Reprod 75:624–632 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chappell PE, White RS, Mellon PL 2003. Circadian gene expression regulates pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) secretory patterns in the hypothalamic GnRH-secreting GT1–7 cell line. J Neurosci 23:11202–11213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mosko SS, Moore RY 1979. Neonatal suprachiasmatic nucleus lesions: effects on the development of circadian rhythms in the rat. Brain Res 164:17–38 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Palm IF, Van Der Beek EM, Wiegant VM, Buijs RM, Kalsbeek A 1999. Vasopressin induces a luteinizing hormone surge in ovariectomized, estradiol-treated rats with lesions of the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Neuroscience 93:659–666 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Brown-Grant K, Raisman G 1977. Abnormalities in reproductive function associated with the destruction of the suprachiasmatic nuclei in female rats. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 198:279–296 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Herzog ED, Grace MS, Harrer C, Williamson J, Shinohara K, Block GD 2000. The role of Clock in the developmental expression of neuropeptides in the suprachiasmatic nucleus. J Comp Neurol 424:86–98 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kennaway DJ, Boden MJ, Voultsios A 2005. Reproductive performance in female Clock(Δ19) mutant mice. Reprod Fertil Dev 16:801–810 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Miller BH, Olson SL, Turek FW, Levine JE, Horton TH, Takahashi JS 2004. Circadian clock mutation disrupts estrous cyclicity and maintenance of pregnancy. Curr Biol 14:1367–1373 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Antoch MP, Song EJ, Chang AM, Vitaterna MH, Zhao Y, Wilsbacher LD, Sangoram AM, King DP, Pinto LH, Takahashi JS 1997. Functional identification of the mouse circadian Clock gene by transgenic BAC rescue. Cell 89:655–667 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.King DP, Vitaterna MH, Chang AM, Dove WF, Pinto LH, Turek FW, Takahashi JS 1997. The mouse Clock mutation behaves as an antimorph and maps within the W19H deletion, distal of Kit. Genetics 146:1049–1060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.King DP, Zhao Y, Sangoram AM, Wilsbacher LD, Tanaka M, Antoch MP, Steeves TD, Vitaterna MH, Kornhauser JM, Lowrey PL, Turek FW, Takahashi JS 1997. Positional cloning of the mouse circadian clock gene. Cell 89:641–653 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Vitaterna MH, King DP, Chang AM, Kornhauser JM, Lowrey PL, McDonald JD, Dove WF, Pinto LH, Turek FW, Takahashi JS 1994. Mutagenesis and mapping of a mouse gene, Clock, essential for circadian behavior. Science 264:719–725 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kennaway DJ, Voultsios A, Varcoe TJ, Moyer RW 2003. Melatonin and activity rhythm responses to light pulses in mice with the Clock mutation. Am J Physiol 284:R1231–R1240 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 21.Kennaway DJ, Owens JA, Voultsios A, Varcoe TJ 2006. Functional central rhythmicity and light entrainment, but not liver and muscle rhythmicity, are Clock independent. Am J Physiol 291:R1172–R1180 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 22.Debruyne JP, Noton E, Lambert CM, Maywood ES, Weaver DR, Reppert SM 2006. A clock shock: mouse CLOCK is not required for circadian oscillator function. Neuron 50:465–477 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bunger MK, Walisser JA, Sullivan R, Manley PA, Moran SM, Kalscheur VL, Colman RJ, Bradfield CA 2005. Progressive arthropathy in mice with a targeted disruption of the Mop3/Bmal-1 locus. Genesis 41:122–132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bunger MK, Wilsbacher LD, Moran SM, Clendenin C, Radcliffe LA, Hogenesch JB, Simon MC, Takahashi JS, Bradfield CA 2000. Mop3 is an essential component of the master circadian pacemaker in mammals. Cell 103:1009–1017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kondratov RV, Kondratova AA, Gorbacheva VY, Vykhovanets OV, Antoch MP 2006. Early aging and age-related pathologies in mice deficient in BMAL1, the core component of the circadian clock. Genes Dev 20:1868–1873 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Alvarez JD, Hansen A, Ord T, Bebas P, Chappell PE, Giebultowicz JM, Williams C, Moss S, Sehgal A 2008. The circadian clock protein BMAL1 is necessary for fertility and proper testosterone production in mice. J Biol Rhythms 23:26–36 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Boden MJ, Kennaway DJ 2006. Circadian rhythms and reproduction. Reproduction 132:379–392 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kennaway DJ 2005. The role of circadian rhythmicity in reproduction. Hum Reprod Update 11:91–101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lee KY, Jeong JW, Wang J, Ma L, Martin JF, Tsai SY, Lydon JP, DeMayo FJ 2007. Bmp2 is critical for the murine uterine decidual response. Mol Cell Biol 27:5468–5478 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Allen E 1922. The oestrus cycle in the mouse. Am J Anat 30:297–348 [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pedersen T, Peters H 1968. Proposal for a classification of oocytes and follicles in the mouse ovary. J Reprod Fertil 17:555–557 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pangas SA, Li X, Robertson EJ, Matzuk MM 2006. Premature luteinization and cumulus cell defects in ovarian-specific Smad4 knockout mice. Mol Endocrinol 20:1406–1422 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hogan B, Beddington R, Constantini F, Lacy E 1994. Manipulating the mouse embryo: a laboratory manual. Plainview, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
  • 34.Gross GA, Imamura T, Luedke C, Vogt SK, Olson LM, Nelson DM, Sadovsky Y, Muglia LJ 1998. Opposing actions of prostaglandins and oxytocin determine the onset of murine labor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:11875–11879 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mann R, Keri R, Nilson J 1999. Transgenic mice with chronically elevated luteinizing hormone are infertile due to anovulation, defects in uterine receptivity, and midgestation pregnancy failure. Endocrinology 140:2592–2601 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wang H, Dey SK 2006. Roadmap to embryo implantation: clues from mouse models. Nat Rev Genet 7:185–199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.de la Iglesia H, Schwartz W 2006. Minireview: timely ovulation: circadian regulation of the female hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal axis. Endocrinology 147:1148–1153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ma L, Benson G, Lim H, Dey S, Maas R 1998. Abdominal B (AbdB) Hoxa genes: regulation in adult uterus by estrogen and progesterone and repression in müllerian duct by the synthetic estrogen diethylstilbestrol (DES). Dev Biol 197:141–154 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hasegawa T, Zhao L, Caron KM, Majdic G, Suzuki T, Shizawa S, Sasano H, Parker KL 2000. Developmental roles of the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) as revealed by StAR knockout mice. Mol Endocrinol 14:1462–1471 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Nakao N, Yasuo S, Nishimura A, Yamamura T, Watanabe T, Anraku T, Okano T, Fukada Y, Sharp PJ, Ebihara S, Yoshimura T 2007. Circadian clock gene regulation of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein gene expression in preovulatory ovarian follicles. Endocrinology 148:3031–3038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Endocrinology are provided here courtesy of The Endocrine Society

RESOURCES