Abstract
Among untreated HIV-infected pregnant women, the frequency of mother-to-child transmission of HIV is low (5–10%), with most infections occurring at or after birth. Given findings that fetal and adult monocytes are distinct from one another in terms of basal transcriptional profiles, and in phosphorylation of signal transducer and activators of transcription in response to cytokines, we hypothesized that fetal CD14+CD16− monocyte and monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) might, compared to their adult counterparts, express higher levels of transcripts for restriction factors and antiviral factors at baseline and/or after stimulation with cytokines that might be induced upon transmission of HIV in utero, for example, IFNα, IFNγ, and IL-6. We carried out these experiments and noted that a few genes, including APOBEC3B, APOBEC3C, and IFITM2, were expressed to a greater degree in fetal monocytes compared to adults. Similarly, the expression levels of APOBEC3F and TRIM32 were greater in fetal MDMs. However, most of these differences were not observed after stimulation with cytokines and the vast majority of antiviral genes were more highly expressed in adults. Therefore, the results of this study are not consistent with the hypothesis that increased expression of antiviral genes in fetal myeloid cells confers immune protection to fetuses in utero.
Keywords: : monocyte, macrophage, restriction factor, interferon
Introduction
A growing body of evidence has emerged in recent years to suggest that cells making up the fetal human immune system are distinct from those found later in life (11). More specifically, it has been found that adult and fetal naïve CD4+ T cells have markedly different propensities to differentiate into Foxp3+ regulatory CD4+ T cells (10) and that fetal CD14+CD16− monocytes have distinct transcriptional signatures at baseline and after stimulation with various inflammatory cytokines, including IFNγ, IL-6, and IL-4 (8). Different transcriptional responses in myeloid cells to inflammatory stimuli might underlie several clinical observations made in the context of infection of the human fetus. Among all fetuses exposed to HIV during the course of a full-term gestation, only 5–10% are infected at the time of birth (9,17). Interestingly, many HIV-exposed uninfected neonates harbor detectable HIV-specific cytotoxic and helper T cell responses, suggesting direct exposure of the fetal immune system to HIV in utero (2). We wondered whether differential myeloid responses, predominant in the fetus and not readily elicited in the adult, might serve to protect the fetus from HIV infection in utero.
Intrinsic host-encoded restriction factors and other antiviral genes possess potent antiretroviral activities (4,18) that can interfere with the HIV life cycle, and the expression of these genes is known to vary in cells of different subpopulations and activation states (1,13,15). Previous work by our group led to the development of a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based array capable of examining the expression of a predefined set of antiviral genes in primary cells from adults who were healthy (15), HIV-infected (14), and psoriatic (16). Here, we hypothesized that differential transcriptional patterns found in adult versus fetal monocytes and monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) might lead to differential expression of restriction factors and other antiviral genes, as detected by this assay. To test this hypothesis, we measured the relative expression of selected viral restriction factors and other antiviral genes in monocytes and MDMs obtained from human fetal bone marrow (FBM) and adult bone marrow (ABM). We also examined the change in expression of these genes after stimulation with IFNα, IFNγ, and IL-6 to determine whether induced antiviral responses would differ between adult and fetal monocytes and MDMs.
Materials and Methods
Isolation of bone marrow monocytes
FBM was obtained from 18 to 22 gestational week specimens provided by the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, San Francisco General Hospital under the auspices of Committee on Human Research-approved protocols. Fetal samples were excluded in the case of (i) known maternal infection, (ii) intrauterine fetal demise, and/or (iii) known or suspected chromosomal abnormality. Fetal monocytes were isolated from femurs by bisection and mechanical dispersion of marrow in RPMI-1640 (Sigma). ABM samples were obtained from healthy donors (AllCells, LLC or Lonza, Inc.). Both adult and fetal mononuclear cells were isolated by density centrifugation of a Ficoll-Hypaque gradient (Sigma). All samples, both fetal and adult, were viably cryopreserved before use.
Culture and stimulation of monocytes and MDMs
For cytokine stimulation experiments, sorted cells were incubated for 4 h in sterile R10 media (RPMI medium 1640 [GIBCO], 10% fetal bovine serum [FBS; Gemini], 100 U/mL penicillin [Mediatech], 100 μg/mL streptavidin [Mediatech], 2 mM L-glutamine [Mediatech], 20 mM HEPES [Mediatech]), and appropriate amounts of cytokine: 150 IU/mL IFNα (PBL), 40 ng/mL IFNγ (Biolegend), or 70 ng/mL IL-6 (Biolegend). MDMs were produced by culturing purified monocytes in sterile R10 with 50 ng/mL of M-CSF (Gibco), changing the media every 3 days. After 6 days of culture, MDMs were stimulated with cytokines and subsequently lysed in 1 mL of TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen).
Flow cytometry
Mononuclear cell preparations were incubated in fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) buffer (phosphate-buffered saline [PBS] with 2% FBS and 2 mM EDTA) with fluourochrome-conjugated antibodies against human surface antigens, including CD3-Alexa700 (UCHTI; BD Biosciences), CD14-qDot605 (TüK4; Invitrogen), CD16-PacificBlue (3G8; BD Biosciences), and HLA-DR-PE-Cy7 (L234, BD Biosciences). All cells were stained with a live/dead marker (Amine-Aqua/AmCyan; Invitrogen) to exclude dead cells from the analysis, filtered through 70 μM mesh filters (Falcon), and sorted by FACS (FACS Aria; BD Biosciences) directly into PBS with 2% FBS and 2 mM EDTA. The purity of sorted CD3-HLA-DR+CD14+CD16− classical monocytes was assessed by reanalyzing a small fraction of sorted cells and consistently found to be 88.7% ± 5.2% for fetal samples and 92.3% ± 4.1% for adult samples.
Gene expression
Total RNA was extracted from cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen), followed by a 15 min spin at 12,000 g at 4°C. RNA was extracted from the aqueous layer using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen) with in-solution DNAase treatment (Qiagen RNase-Free DNase Set) and eluted in 20 μL of RNase-free water. DNase-treated RNA was transcribed into cDNA using random primers and the SuperScript VILO cDNA Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Quantitative real-time PCR assays utilized custom-made TaqMan low density arrays (TLDA) from Applied Biosystems, following the manufacturer's instructions. All gene cards used for quantification were first described in reference (13). Thermal cycling was performed using an ABI ViiA7 Real-Time PCR System. cDNA (in 100 μL of Applied Biosystems TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix with UNG) was loaded onto the designated ports of the TLDA plates. Data were analyzed using ABI ViiA7 software. A panel of six housekeeping genes (GAPDH, 18S, ACTB, PPIA, RPLP0, and UBC) was included in the TLDA plates and the gene, PPIA, was identified as the most stably expressed using the GeNorm algorithm. Raw cycle threshold numbers of amplified gene products were accordingly normalized to the levels of PPIA to control for cDNA input amounts. Fold induction was determined using the comparative Ct method.
Data analysis
All analyses were performed using a two-tailed unpaired nonparametric Mann–Whitney t-test and plots were generated using median and interquartile range. Antiviral factors with differential expression between adult and fetal samples with a statistical significance of p < 0.05 were highlighted.
Results and Discussion
Live classical (CD3-HLA-DR+CD14+CD16−) monocytes were sort-purified from seven adult and seven fetal donor bone marrow tissues (with representative examples in Figs. 1A, B, respectively). Sorted and plated adult monocytes showed the size and morphology of monocytes when examined microscopically (Fig. 1C). Upon M-CSF stimulation, adult MDMs were found to be adherent, flattened, and elongated, consistent with the expected morphology of MDMs (Fig. 1D). Fetal monocytes and M-CSF-stimulated MDMs demonstrated the same morphologies as their adult counterparts (data not shown).
FIG. 1.
Phenotypic and morphologic characterization of human fetal and ABM-derived monocytes and MDMs. (A) FACS plots and gating strategy of a representative ABM sample from which single, live cells with the phenotype of CD3-HLADR+CD14+CD16− classical monocytes were sorted. (B) FACS plots and gating strategy of a representative FBM sample from which single, live cells with the phenotype of CD3-HLADR+CD14+CD16− classical monocytes were sorted. (C) ABM-derived monocytes were viewed by light microscopy 4 h after sort purification. (D) ABM-derived adherent MDMs were viewed by light microscopy 6 days after stimulation of sort-purified monocytes with 50 ng/mL M-CSF. ABM, adult bone marrow; FACS, fluorescence activated cell sorting; FBM, fetal bone marrow; MDMs, monocyte-derived macrophages.
A customized RNA expression array (1,13,14) was used to measure the baseline expression levels of antiviral genes and restriction factors in fetal and adult monocytes and MDMs. Compared with fetal monocytes, adult monocytes had significantly higher levels of expression of the following genes: APOBEC3A (p < 0.05), CDKN1A (p < 0.01), EIF2AK2 (p < 0.01), HERC5 (p < 0.05), ISG15 (p < 0.01), MX2 (p < 0.001), PML/TRIM19 (p < 0.01), RSAD2 (p <0.001), and TRIM22 (p < 0.01) (Mann–Whitney t-test) (Fig. 2A). In contrast, APOBEC3B, APOBEC3C, and IFITM2 were significantly overexpressed in fetal monocytes (p < 0.05). Interestingly, most of these genes were expressed at equivalent levels in fetal and adult cells upon maturation in vitro into MDMs, the exceptions being APOBEC3F and TRIM32, which were more highly expressed in fetal MDMs (p < 0.05), and RNASEL, which was more highly expressed in adult MDMs (p < 0.01) (Fig. 2A). Since fetal and adult monocytes were cultured in vitro as they matured into MDMs, it is possible that more differences would have been observed if it were possible to study macrophages directly isolated from fetal and adult tissues.
FIG. 2.
Relative expression of antiviral genes in adult versus fetal monocytes and MDMs, before and after simulation with IFNα. (A) Relative expression of select antiviral genes in ABM- versus FBM-derived monocytes and MDMs without cytokine stimulation (n = 7). (B) Relative expression of select antiviral genes in ABM- versus FBM-derived monocytes and MDMs after 4 h of stimulation with 150 IU/mL of IFNα (n = 7).
Since many restriction factors and antiviral genes relevant to HIV infection are induced by IFNα (4) and since IFNα has been observed to decrease viral replication in adult MDMs (7), we investigated whether there might be differential expression of these genes in fetal versus adult monocytes and MDMs. Fetal and adult monocytes and MDMs were stimulated with IFNα and, as expected, IFNα induced the expression of most antiviral genes in all four populations with the exception of BRD4, CPSF6, CTR9, and TRIM28 (not shown). After stimulation, fetal monocytes continued to express APOBEC3B (p < 0.01) to a greater degree than adult monocytes. On the other hand, CH25H (p < 0.05), CDKN1A (p < 0.01), BRD4 (p < 0.05), and LGALS3BP (p < 0.05) were expressed to a significantly greater degree by adult monocytes relative to fetal monocytes (Fig. 2B). Comparing adult and fetal MDMs, there was no significant difference in antiviral gene expression after IFNα stimulation (Fig. 2B).
Previously, it had been shown that IFNγ stimulation of adult and fetal monocytes leads to differential signal transducer and activators of transcription 1 and 5 (STAT1 and STAT5) activation and to differential expression of genes associated with antigen presentation and innate pathogen responses (8) and, in adult MDMs, to decreased HIV replication (7). We hypothesized that these effects may be associated with the expression of specific antiviral genes in adult and fetal monocytes and MDMs after stimulation with IFNγ. As shown in Figure 3A, IFNγ treatment of adult monocytes induced a significantly higher expression of CDKN1A (p < 0.05), MX2 (p < 0.05), MOV10 (p < 0.05), RSAD2 (p < 0.05), ISG15 (p < 0.05), BST2 (p < 0.05), PML/TRIM19 (p < 0.05), TRIM26 (p < 0.05), and TREX1 (p < 0.05) compared to that found in fetal monocytes. When MDMs were stimulated with IFNγ, adult cells had greater expression of SAMHD1 (p < 0.05), RTF1 (p < 0.05), and SLFN11 (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3A).
FIG. 3.
Relative expression of antiviral genes in adult and fetal monocytes and MDMs, following stimulation with IFNγ or IL-6. (A) Relative expression of selected antiviral genes in ABM- versus FBM-derived monocytes and MDMs after 4 h of stimulation with 40 ng/mL of IFNγ (n = 4). (B) Relative expression of selected antiviral genes in ABM- versus FBM-derived monocytes after 4 h of stimulation with 70 ng/mL of IL-6 (n = 4). (MDM data not shown as there were no significant differences.)
IL-6 is an important cytokine in the context of HIV infection (3), increasing HIV replication in adult MDMs (7). It is also a contributor to inflammatory environments in the fetus that can result in spontaneous abortion (5) and a cytokine previously studied in the context of transcriptional profiles in fetal and adult myeloid cells (8). We accordingly investigated the effects of IL-6 on the induction of antiviral genes in fetal and adult myeloid cells. After stimulation with IL-6, adult monocytes showed greater expression of TRIM5 (p < 0.05), APOBEC3A (p < 0.05), CDKN1A (p < 0.05), MX2 (p < 0.05), TRIM22 (p < 0.05), RSAD2 (p < 0.05), CNP (p < 0.05), ISG15 (p < 0.05), PML/TRIM19 (p < 0.05), TRIM21 (p < 0.05), TRIM26 (p < 0.05), ELF2AK2 (p < 0.05), and TREX1 (p < 0.05). However, when differentiated into MDMs before stimulation, adult and fetal cells did not demonstrate differential expression of any antiviral genes (Fig. 3B and Table 1).
Table 1.
Summary Table of Differential Gene Expression in Unstimulated and Cytokine-Stimulated Fetal Versus Adult Monocytes and Monocyte-Derived Macrophages
Gene expression in fetus > adult | Gene expression in adult > fetus | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Monocytes | MDMs | Monocytes | MDMs | |
Baseline | APOBEC3B* (4.433 ± 5.302), APOBEC3C* (6.388 ± 5.952), IFITM2* (19.20 ± 13.73) | APOBEC3F* (0.3137 ± 0.5090), TRIM32* (3.043 ± 2.777) | APOBEC3A* (11.46 ± 15.62), CDKN1A** (74.41 ± 29.26), ELF2AK2** (32.08 ± 45.32), HERC5* (10.88 ± 14.75), ISG15** (1.96 ± 1.90), MX2*** (26.40 ± 35.52), PML** (16.08 ± 26.30), RSAD2*** (9.814 ± 9.056), TRIM22** (22.23 ± 16.63) | RNASEL** (1.69 ± 1.49) |
IFNα stim | APOBEC3B** (8.098 ± 14.34) | None | CH25H* (0.5308 ± 0.8212), CDKN1A** (113.6 ± 68.03), BRD4* (88.30 ± 80.51), LGALS3BP* (1.603 ± 2.199) | None |
IL-6 stim | None | None | TRIM5* (13.38 ± 3.84), APOBEC3A* (24.42 ± 51.61), CDKN1A* (63.14 ± 11.39), MX2* (35.3 ± 62.3), TRIM22* (35.69 ± 20.59), RSAD2* (11.67 ± 29.16), CNP* (7.467 ± 4.531), ISG15* (1.666 ± 6.363), PML/TRIM19* (31.68 ± 39.47), TRIM21* (12.41 ± 8.79), TRIM26* (17.72 ± 6.86), ELF2AK2* (29.04 ± 38.25), TREX1* (13.05 ± 4.977) | None |
IFNγ stim | None | None | CDKN1A* (118.1 ± 36.5), MX2* (56.47 ± 53.72), MOV10* (20.28 ± 6.42), RSAD2* (410.1 ± 307.8), ISG15* (3.129 ± 6.127), BST2* (19.98 ± 13.67), PML/TRIM19* (134.9 ± 110.2), TRIM26* (28.86 ± 16.24), TREX1* (17.89 ± 7.30) | SAMHD1* (134.7 ± 50.0), RTF1* (8.553 ± 2.919), and SLFN11* (12.04 ± 5.801) |
Median and interquartile range are reported in this table. All statistical analyses were performed using a two-tailed unpaired nonparametric Mann–Whitney t-test. Antiviral factors with differential expression between adult and fetal samples with a statistical significance of p < 0.05 are indicated: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
MDMs, monocyte-derived macrophages.
To our knowledge, this is the first comparative study of the expression of transcripts for restriction factors and antiviral genes in fetal and adult human monocytes and MDMs. Given our previous observations that fetal monocytes phosphorylate canonical and noncanonical STATs and respond more strongly to IFNγ, IL-6, and IL-4 than do adult monocytes (8), we hypothesized that fetal monocytes and, in particular, fetal MDMs might more readily upregulate restriction factors and other antiviral factors than their adult counterparts and, accordingly, be less permissive to HIV infection. If so, this might provide some degree of protection to the fetus against mother-to-child transmission of HIV and explain, at least in part, why the frequency of HIV infection of the fetus in utero is low (9,17).
Our findings are not consistent with this hypothesis. First, transcripts for most restriction factors and antiviral factors are expressed at higher levels in resting adult compared to resting fetal monocytes. Second, differences in the expression of such factors largely disappear when monocytes matured to macrophages in vitro. Indeed, since macrophages are generally much more permissive to HIV infection than are resting monocytes (12), this is the stage of myeloid differentiation that is likely most relevant in the context of HIV.
There are, of course, important caveats to these findings that must be taken into account. First, we have only measured the relative transcript levels of given restriction factors and antiviral factors, and there is not always a positive correlation between mRNA and protein expression levels (6). Second, the transcripts assayed in this study represent but a subset of the total family of factors that might play a protective role in utero. Third, and given limitations in the cell yields obtained from each of the bone marrow specimens, it was not possible to show directly that HIV infection levels are (or are not) similar in fetal and adult monocytes and MDMs. Finally, and not least, it is possible that other mediators, alone or in combination with certain restriction factors and antiviral factors, might play a role in protecting the fetus from HIV infection in utero. That being said, we believe that the current data sets address important and novel aspects of myeloid cell biology in utero, and may help to guide the design of future studies in this area.
In sum, notwithstanding the fact that fetal myeloid cells demonstrate unique transcriptional and immunologic properties (8), our data are not consistent with the hypothesis that increased expression of transcripts for restriction factors and antiviral genes within them confers fetal resistance to HIV. Future studies might extend these observations to address the above caveats and to more completely explore the apparent resistance of the human fetus to HIV infection in utero.
Authors' Contributions
K.T., R.A.S.R., M.M.L., W.Y., and J.M.M. designed the experiment. K.T., E.R.K-L., W.Y., and D.S. performed the sample preparation and in vitro assays. R.A.S.R. and V.D.C. carried out the quantitative PCR-based arrays. K.T., R.A.S.R., D.S., and J.M.M. interpreted the data and wrote the article.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a pilot grant from the UCSF-Gladstone Institute of Virology and Immunology Center for AIDS Research (to W.Y.), by NIH grants R01 AI100092 (to J.M.M.) and NIH NIAID K08 A120071 (to D.S.), and JD080474 (a subcontract to J.M.M. from PI Dr. Deborah Persaud), and the Harvey V. Berneking Living Trust.
Author Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
References
- 1.Abdel-Mohsen M, Raposo RA, Deng X, et al. Expression profile of host restriction factors in HIV-1 elite controllers. Retrovirology 2013;10:106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Afran L, Garcia Knight M, Nduati E, et al. HIV-exposed uninfected children: a growing population with a vulnerable immune system? Clin Exp Immunol 2014;176:11–22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Breen EC, Rezai AR, Nakajima K, et al. Infection with HIV is associated with elevated IL-6 levels and production. J Immunol 1990;144:480–484 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Doyle T, Goujon C, and Malim MH. HIV-1 and interferons: who's interfering with whom? Nat Rev Microbiol 2015;13:403–413 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gotsch F, Romero R, Kusanovic JP, et al. The fetal inflammatory response syndrome. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2007;50:652–683 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Guo Y, Xiao P, Lei S, et al. How is mRNA expression predictive for protein expression? A correlation study on human circulating monocytes. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai) 2008;40:426–436 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kedzierska K, and Crowe SM. Cytokines and HIV-1: interactions and clinical implications. Antivir Chem Chemother 2001;12:133–150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Krow-Lucal ER, Kim CC, Burt TD, et al. Distinct functional programming of human fetal and adult monocytes. Blood 2014;123:1897–1904 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lehman DA. and Farquhar C. Biological mechanisms of vertical human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) transmission. Rev Med Virol 2007;17:381–403 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mold JE, Michaelsson J, Burt TD, et al. Maternal alloantigens promote the development of tolerogenic fetal regulatory T cells in utero. Science 2008;322:1562–1565 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mold JE, Venkatasubrahmanyam S, Burt TD, et al. Fetal and adult hematopoietic stem cells give rise to distinct T cell lineages in humans. Science 2010;330:1695–1699 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Orenstein JM, Fox C, and Wahl SM. Macrophages as a source of HIV during opportunistic infections. Science 1997;276:1857–1861 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Raposo RA, Abdel-Mohsen M, Bilska M, et al. Effects of cellular activation on anti-HIV-1 restriction factor expression profile in primary cells. J Virol 2013;87:11924–11929 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Raposo RA, Abdel-Mohsen M, Deng X, et al. Dynamic regulation of host restriction factor expression over the course of HIV-1 infection in vivo. J Virol 2014;88:11624–11629 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Raposo RA, Abdel-Mohsen M, Holditch SJ, et al. Increased expression of intrinsic antiviral genes in HLA-B*57-positive individuals. J Leukoc Biol 2013;94:1051–1059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Raposo RA, Gupta R, Abdel-Mohsen M, et al. Antiviral gene expression in psoriasis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2015;29:1951–1957 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Scarlatti G. Paediatric HIV infection. Lancet 1996;348:863–868 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Simon V, Bloch N, and Landau NR. Intrinsic host restrictions to HIV-1 and mechanisms of viral escape. Nat Immunol 2015;16:546–553 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]